4.2 Resolving method for 4-fold covers
Letπ:X →Y be a 4-fold cover over a smooth surface. Our strategy is similar to the canonical resolution for double and triple covers. So letσ(1) :Y(1)→Y be the blowing-up at a singularity of ∆(π). Then we obtain the following diagram of normalizations ofY(1).
Y(1)
X1(1) X2(1) Xe(1)
X(1) π˜(1) ψ(1)2
ψ(1)3
ψ(1)1 π(1)
φ(1)
By the succession of this process, the branch locus is modified to smooth for double and triple covers. However, we see, from the following example, that it is not true for 4-fold covers.
Example 4.2.1. The question is local onY.So letY =C2, andC(Y) =C(x, y), the rational function field inxandy.LetK=C(Y)(z) such thatf :=z4−xy is the minimal polynomial ofz overC(Y),andπ:X→Y theK-normalization of Y. Let E(i) be the exceptional divisor of σ(i). Note that, by Remark 3.3.1, E(i)is not in ∆(π(i)) if and only ifvEY(i)(i)(xy)≡0 (mod 4).
Letσ(i)(i= 1,2,3) be the blowing-ups atP(i)∈Y(i−1) as in the following diagram.
1 1
P(1)
1 1
2 P(2)
1 3
2 1 P(3)
1 5≡1 (4)
1 2
3 P(4)
σ(1) σ(2) σ(3)
Here each number is the valuation at each component. Then P(2) ∈Y(1) and P(4) ∈ Y(3) are intersections of divisors with the valuation 2 and 1 (mod 4), and P(4) is an infinitely near point of P(2). Hence the branch locus is never modified to smooth by the above method.
Lemma 4.2.2. Let π : X → Y be a 4-fold cover. We put ∆• := ∆•(π) for
•=A, B, C, D.Assume the branch locus∆(π) is an SNC divisor. Then (i) (∆A+ ∆B)∩∆C=∅,and
(ii) ∆D∩∆C=∅.
Proof. If Gal(K/e C(Y)) is isomorphic to eitherZ4, D8 orV4,then ∆C = 0 by Remark 3.3.7, hence there is nothing to prove.
(i) If Gal(K/e C(Y)) ∼= A4, then ∆A = ∆B = 0, thus there is nothing to prove. Hence we suppose Gal(K/e C(Y))∼=S4.Sinceψ1◦ψ2 is anS3-cover, we
34 CHAPTER 4. RESOLUTION OF4-FOLD COVERS OF SURFACES can regard ∆A+ ∆B+ ∆C as the branch locus of a triple cover that is simply ramified along ∆A+ ∆B,and is totally ramified along ∆C.So (i) is done by the proof of [22, Theorem 1.4].
(ii) We show the assertion in only the case Gal(K/e C(Y)) ∼= S4 since the assertion in the other case can be also showed by the same way. Suppose that
∆D∩∆C 6= ∅. Let P ∈ ∆D∩∆C, and Pe ∈ ˜π−1(P). Since ψ1 is unramified over P, X1, ψ∗1∆C and ψ∗1∆D are smooth over P. So X2 is smooth at ψ3(Pe).
Moreover, since ψ∗1∆D intersects transversally withψ1∗∆C overP, ψ2∗ψ1∗∆D is smooth over P. Hence Xe is smooth at P .e Note that ψ2◦ψ3 is an A4-cover.
Since the stabilizer ofPebyS4includes (1 2)(3 4) and (1 2 3),that isA4.Hence there is a faithful representation ρ : A4 → GL(2,C) via the action of A4 on the tangent space atP .e SinceA4 is non-commutative,ρis irreducible. On the other hand, it is known by representation theory that there is no irreducible representation ofA4 of dimension 2,which is a contradiction.
We prove Proposition 1.1.1.
Proof of Proposition 1.1.1. Here we show the assertion in only the case where Gal(K/e C(Y))∼=S4 since that in other cases be shown by the same way.
By the well-known embedded resolution of the singularities of a curve in a smooth surface, there are a finite number of blowing-ups σ0 : Y(r0) → Y such that (σ0)∗(∆(π)) is an SNC divisor. So we may assume that ∆A(π) +
∆B(π) + ∆C(π) + ∆D(π) is an SNC divisor. Then there is no intersection of
∆A(π) + ∆B(π) + ∆D(π) and ∆C(π) by Lemma 4.2.2. Hence we can regard
∆C(π) as the branch locus of the cyclic triple coverψ2,and its nodes are resolved by the canonical resolution for triple covers. Similarly, since ∆A(π) + ∆B(π) is the branch locus ofψ1,its nodes are resolved by the canonical resolution for double covers. Therefore there are a finite number of blowing-upsσ00:Y(r00)→ Y such that ∆A(π(r00)) + ∆B(π(r00)) + ∆C(π(r00)) is smooth.
Finally, we assume that π satisfies (i) and (ii) of Proposition 1.1.1. Let σ(P) : Y(P) → Y be the blowing-up at a point P ∈ Y, E(P) the exceptional divisor, andπ(P):X(P)→Y(P)the induced 4-fold cover. Let{P1, . . . , Pr} ⊂Y be the set of nodes of ∆D(π) such that E(Pi) is not in ∆D(π(Pi)). To obtain (iii), we putσ(r):Y(r)→Y the blowing-ups atP1, . . . , Pr.
Remark 4.2.3. Ifπ:X→Y is a 4-fold cover of good type and Gal(K/e C(Y))∼= Z4,then Sing(∆D(π)) =∅sinceψ3is a double cover.
Let σ = σ(1)◦ · · · ◦σ(r) be a finite number of blowing-ups such that π(r) is a 4-fold cover of good type (Definition 1.1.2). Then we have the morphism ν(r):X(r)→X such thatσ◦π(r)=π◦ν(r) by the Stein factorization.
From now, we assume that π : X → Y is a 4-fold cover of good type.
Then the set of singularities of ∆(π) is (∆A(π)∩∆D(π))∪(∆B(π)∩∆D(π))∪ Sing(∆D(π)).
Lemma 4.2.4. Let P ∈ ∆A(π)∩∆D(π). Then π−1(P) consists of a smooth point and anA1-singularity.
4.2. RESOLVING METHOD FOR4-FOLD COVERS 35
point coset stabilizer α1 α2
Pe1 GPe
1 {id, (1 2), (3 4), (1 2)(3 4)} (1 2) (3 4) Pe2 (1 3)GPe
1 {id, (2 3), (1 4), (1 4)(2 3)} (2 3) (1 4) Pe3 (2 3)GPe
1 {id, (1 3), (2 4), (1 3)(2 4)} (1 3) (2 4) Pe4 (2 4)GPe
1 {id, (1 4), (2 3), (1 4)(2 3)} (1 4) (2 3) Pe5 (1 2 4 3)GPe
1 {id, (2 4), (1 3), (1 3)(2 4)} (2 4) (1 3) Pe6 (1 3)(2 4)GPe
1 {id, (3 4), (1 2), (1 2)(3 4)} (3 4) (1 2) Table 4.1: Cosets and stabilizers of thePei.
Proof. By Remark 3.3.7, we obtain ∆A(π) = 0 or ∆D(π) = 0 if Gal(K/e C(Y)) is isomorphic toA4, V4orZ4.Hence it is sufficient to show the assertion in the two cases where Gal(K/e C(Y)) is isomorphic toS4 andD8.Here we show that in only the case Gal(K/e C(Y)) ∼=S4 since that in the other case is shown by the same way.
Suppose Gal(K/e C(Y))∼=S4.The question is local onY,so we may assume that ∆(π) = ∆A(π)+∆D(π),and Sing(∆(π)) ={P}.Since ∆(ψ1) = ∆A(π), X1
is smooth. Since ∆A(π) and ∆D(π) intersect transversally atP, D1:=ψ∗∆D(π) is smooth overP, and intersects transversally with A1 := (ψ∗1∆A(π))red. Since ψ2 is unramified, we obtain three copies of the reduced divisor A1+D1, say A2,i+D2,i (i = 1,2,3). The bidouble cover ψ3 is branched at D2,1+D2,2+ D2,3.So we have A3,i+D3,i (i= 1, . . . ,6) on X,e where A3,iand D3,i intersect transversally over P for each i = 1, . . . ,6. Let Pei be the intersection of A3,i
andD3,ifori= 1, . . . ,6.As the proof of Lemma 3.2.2, we can regard ϕas the quotient map by S3 =h(1 2), (1 2 3)i. By some permutation of {Pei}6i=1, the stabilizerGPe
1 ofPe1 coincide withh(1 2), (3 4)i.
If A3,1 is in the ramification locus of ϕ, then there is a representation ρ : GPe
1→GL(2,C) such thatρ((1 2)) =α1andρ((3 4)) =α2,where α1=
µ1 0 0 −1
¶
, α2=
µ−1 0 0 −1
¶ .
By some permutation of{Pei}6i=2,the corresponding cosets and stabilizers are as shown in Table 4.1. Since (j4)6∈S3(j= 1,2,3), A3,1, A3,2andA3,3are in the ramification locus of ϕ,andA3,4, A3,5 andA3,6 are not in that one. However, sinceα2 fixes just one point,Pe4, Pe5andPe6 are in that one. Thereforeπ−1(P) consists of a smooth point and anA1-singularity.
By the above proof, there are two types of ramification points of ϕ over P ∈ ∆A(π)∩∆D(π). We call Pe ∈ π˜−1(P) a curvewise ramification point if ϕ(Pe) is smooth point ofX,and apointwise ramification point otherwise.
We resolve the singularities of X over ∆A(π)∩∆D(π) in the case where Gal(K/e C(Y))∼= S4. (In the other case, we can resolve the singularity by the
36 CHAPTER 4. RESOLUTION OF4-FOLD COVERS OF SURFACES
X
−1
−1
−1
−2 π
ϕ
˜ π
ψ1
ψ2 ψ3
σ3
ϕ00
: the branch locus ofψ1 orψ3 : the ramification locus ofϕor ϕ00
Figure 4.2.1: The resolution of a singularity overA∩D.
same way.) Assume ∆(π) = ∆A(π)+∆D(π) and Sing(∆(π)) ={P}as the above proof. Let σ3 : Xe00 → Xe be the blowing-ups at three pointwise ramification points of ϕ. Then one can check that S3 acts on Xe00, and each irreducible component of the exceptional divisor of σ3 is fixed by an involution of S3. Hence the quotient X00 := Xe00/S3 is smooth. Since σ3 is an S3-equivariant morphism, there is a morphism ν00 : X00 → X. The resolution is as shown in Figure 4.2.1.
Lemma 4.2.5. Let P ∈ ∆B(π)∩∆D(π). Then π−1(P) consists of an A1 -singularity.
Proof. If Gal(K/e C(Y)) is isomorphic toA4orV4,then ∆B(π) = 0.Thus there is nothing to prove. In the case Gal(K/e C(Y)) ∼= Z4, it is easy to show the assertion. We show that in the only case Gal(K/e C(Y))∼=S4 below since that in the case Gal(K/e C(Y))∼=D4 is shown by the same way.
Suppose Gal(K/e C(Y)) ∼= S4. The question is local on Y, so we may as-sume that ∆(π) = ∆B(π) + ∆D(π) and Sing(∆(π)) = {P}. As the proof of Lemma 4.2.4, X2 is smooth, and we have B2,i +D2,i (i = 1,2,3). Let Pe ∈ π˜−1(P). If Xe is smooth, then GPe includes V4 by Section 4.1. Thus GPe ∼=D8. So there is an irreducible representation ρ: D8 → GL(2,C). Since points ofXe over B2,i are fixed by the cyclic subgroup of order 4 in D8, there is a subspace of the vector space C2 which is fixed by that subgroup via the representationρ.On the other hand, sinceρis irreducible, the fixed locus inC2 of that subgroup is only the origin, which is a contradiction.
Therefore ˜π−1(P) consists of six A1-singularities. By Lemma 3.2.2, ϕ is unramified, soπ−1(P) consists of anA1-singularity.
We resolve the singularities of X over P ∈ ∆B(π)∩∆D(π) in the case
4.3. RAMIFICATION STRUCTURE OF S4-COVERS 37
anA1-singularity
∆B(π)
∆D(π)
ψ1 ψ2
ψ3
ϕ
π
6A1-singularities ψ0 6
3
ϕ0
−1
−1
−1
−2
−2
−2 σ2
Figure 4.2.2: The resolution of a singularity overB∩D.
where Gal(K/e C(Y))∼=S4.(In other cases, it can be resolved by the same way.) Assume that ∆(π) = ∆B(π)+∆D(π),and Sing(∆(π)) ={P}.Letσ2:X20 →X2 be the blowing-ups at three points of (ψ1◦ψ2)−1(P).ThenS3 acts onX20.Let ψ30 : Xe0 → X20 be the K-normalization ofe X20. Then ψ03 is unbranched at the exceptional divisor ofσ2by Corollary 4.1.2. HenceXe0 is smooth. LetX0be the quotientXe0/S3,andϕ0:Xe0 →X0 the quotient map. Thenϕ0is unramified, so X0 is smooth. Since there is anS4-equivariant morphismXe0 →Xe by the Stein factorization, we obtain a morphismν0 :X0 →X.The resolution is as shown in Figure 4.2.2.
Lemma 4.2.6. Let P∈Sing(∆D(π)).ThenX is smooth overP.
Proof. If Gal(K/e C(Y))∼=Z4,then there is nothing to prove by Remark 4.2.3.
Hence we suppose Gal(K/e C(Y))6∼=Z4,thenψ3 is a bidouble cover.
The question is local on Y, so we may assume that ∆(π) = ∆D(π), and Sing(∆(π)) ={P}.By the definition of a 4-fold cover of good type and Corol-lary 4.1.2,Xe is smooth. By Lemma 3.2.2,ϕis unramified, soX is smooth.
By the above argument, we construct a resolutionν :=ν(r)◦ν00 :X00→X for any 4-fold coverπ:X →Y as Figure 1.1.2.