PLATE
PLAttE 69 Microwear on burin(obSidian)(No.10)
第69図 版 ビュア リンに見 られ る使用痕
(黒曜石 )(NQ!0)
△ が 画 面 の上
第70図 版 スク レィパ ーに見 られ る使用痕
(黒曜石 )(NQ‖
)△ が画面の上
95
PLATE 70
Microwear on scraper (obsidianxNo' Il)
Scale 7: !0
As
for
the chronological aspectof
Mosanru Site, three C-14 dates are availablefrom
charcoal pieces sampled during the excavationin
1979 by the Shimokawa-cho Boardof
Education.According
to
the Gakushuin University dating, L3,Z7O -+- 420B. P.
Upper stratumiY
(GaK-8722)14,320
-t
4ZOB. P.
Lower stratumlY
(GaK-a724)15,080
t
450B. P.
Lower straturnIV
(GaK-8723)It is
not definite whether stratum4 of
Tohoku University trench correspondsto
stratumIV of
the Shimokawa,cho excavation where the samples were obtained.Artifacts
were foundin
ttre above men-tioned straturnIV,
while stratum 4of
Tohoku University was sterile.Considering the characteristics
of
Mosanru assemblagein
comparisonwith
the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic industriesin
other partsof
Japan, the site was probably occupied between 12,000 and 10,000years ago,
at
the latest periodof
the Pleistocene.It
was the time when the oldest linearrelief
pottery already appearedin
the soutJrern islandof
Honshu.1) A
peculiarkind of
hard, siliceous shale fracturingwith
concoidal features conventionally has beencalled simply "shale" by Japanese prehistorians.
It
is,in
fact,a
kindof
crypto-crystalline silica (CCS).2)
Obsidian tools also sometimes develop polishes, but the classificationof
themstill
remainsto
be established.Translated
bv
Kaoru Akoshima)References cited
KAJIWARA Hiroshi and Kaoru AKOSHIMA
1981
An
Experimental Studyof
Microwear Polish on Shale Artifacts. ( I{okogaku Zasshi 67.L, pp.1-36. (in Japanese
with
English summary)SERIZAWA Chosuke, Hiroshi KAJIWARA, and I{aoru AKOSHIMA
.
L982 Experimental Studyof
Microwear Traces andIts
Potentiality. I{okogaku To Shizenkag,.ku(Archaeology and Natural Sciences),
No.
14, pp.67-87. (in Japanesewith
English sumrnary) Shimokawa-cho Boardof
Education, Instituteof
Regional History1981 Mosanru S#e (in Japanese
with
English summary) IWAMOTO.Keisuke1972 T]ne Stone Irnplernents
of
the Ruinsof
Mosanruin
Hokkaido. Rekishi (Tohoku Historical Journal), No. 42, pp.1-16.
(in Japanese)Excavation of Mosanru Site
Chosuke SERIZAWA
Mosanru Site
is
locatedat
38-sen, Kosei, Shimokawa-cho, Kamikawa-gun, Hokkaido, Japan.It
issituated on
a low river
terrace formed between the Nayoro River and the Mosanru River, about 190m
above sea level,.about 20m
above the Nayoro River bed. The site was discoveredin
1963by
Mr.Hironobu Yamazaki-
His
test excavationin
the following year revealed the Palaeolithic character of the site, as typicalAraya
Burins and tanged points were includedin
the assernblage. SinceI
heardfrom
him about these facts,I
was deeply interestedin
excavating the sitein
orderto
shed some light on thefinal
phasesof
the Palaeolithicin
Hokkaido, the northernmost islandof
Japan.My
proposalof
excavation was supportedwith
his local cooperation and the excavationof
seventeen daysin
total was carriedout
as follows.First
season : fr:om August 20to
27,1964.Second season :
from
August 16to
24, 1965.All
artifactsfrom
the excavations were broughtto
Laboratoryof
Archaeology, Tohoku IJniversityfor
thorough analysesto
be conducted.The
Laboratory has continued the studyof
them since ttren.ln
L972,a
preliminary report was publishedby
Keisuke Iwamoto. Tsutornu Hayashilater
attempted. apatient
work of
conjoining the lithics andfruitful
results v/ere obtained especially on thetool
produc-tion
technology and on refitments among flakes, cores, and tools. Hiroshi Kajiwara recently approachedthe Mosanru material frorn functional point
of
view by meansoi
use-wear analysis, and piecesof
interesting information were recovered. This constitutesa part of
the projectof
Tohoku Uniwersity Microwear Research Team (T. M. R- team)that
has been activefor
5 years. Nineteen years have already passed sinceI first
conducted this excavation..I wouldlike
to assume, however, theresponsi-bility
as excavation directorby
publishing the results sofar
achieved-I
would alsolike
tomention the debts
I
owein
completing this Archaeological Materiat Series volume 4,to Mr.
Hironobu Yarnazaki, the Shimokawa-cho (town) Boardof
Education, andall
those who participatedin
the exca-vations-A total of
7350lithic
artifacts were excavatedfrom
Mosanru Site including tools, flakes and cores,but
only 41of
them are typologically definable retouched implements (table 2). Burins,a
fragmental bifacial point, end-scrapers,a
borer, adzes anda
keeled scraper represent the assemblage. The notable characteristicof
the Mosanru materialis its
high frequencyof
conjoining arnong flakes andwith
their respective cores. Laborious effortsto refit
them have resultedin
rnore than twenty conjoined nodules,the largest one consisting
of
46 pieces.These refitted examples enabled us
to
reconstruct their core reduction sequences. The techniques of flake productionof
Mosanru people are thus classifiedinto four
types,in
termsof
the relationship between platform(s)and
unrking face (s), aswell
as the number and locationof ihe
two.A
uorking /ace tefets hereto
the planeof
corefrom
where flakes are removed,that
is, the potential dorsal faceof
successively removed flakes.Type
I.
The core reduction sequenceswith
one platforrnfor
one working face- (Examples;
nodules B,c,
D,N,
O, T).Type
II.
Sequenceswith two
parallel platforrns facing each otherfor
one working face. (Examples ;nodules
A,
E,M,
P, Q, R).Type
III.
Sequences where more thantwo
ptatforms are relatedto
more thantwo
working faces.(Examples
;
nodulesF.
G.H.
L)-Type
IV.
Sequencesfrom
one working facein
spiteof
more thantwo
platforms. (Examples;
nodulesI,
S).T. M. R. team has accumulated. a certain arnount
of
experimental data using shale1)
and chert. The classificationof
use-wear polishes on replicated shale toolsis
shownin
ptate582)
(Serizawaet
al.1982,
I(ajiwara
and Akoshirna 1981). Most Mosanru artifacts are rnadeof
quartz rhyolite, alsoa
kindof
CCS, and the experimental results are appticableto
them. The surfaceof
Mosanru materials actually looks very similar underi the metallurgical microscopeto
shale and chert. Eleven artifacts were exam-inedin
the present analysis,two of
which are madeof
obsidian. They arefour
burins, fiwe end-scrapers.a
keeled scraper anda
broken scraper.The inferences are summed up as follows. The main working edges
of
quartz rhyolite burins were the sharp edges between burin facets and ventral faces. Other edges around the burins were also used-Edges on burin facets were usedin whittling
rnotions and tipsof
the facet edges were usedin
graving.Cutting pnd