• 検索結果がありません。

第二部

ドキュメント内 『宗教研究』156号(32巻1輯) (ページ 106-117)

所  の

第三部  第二部

一 

︑第一部 

関西地域研究調査九月五日︵金︶ | 九月 

Ⅲ参加者登録 

閉会式九月九日︵火︶  公開講演九月八日︵月︶ 

関東地域研究調査八月三一日︵日︶ | 九月 

大会議八月二八日︵木︶ 

・ 八月 

シソポジウム九月二日︵火︶ 

| 九月 

口 八月二 セ日 ︵水︶午後一時 | 五時 

口 

場所東京産経会館 

ロ参加者は次の参加費を支払うときに参加者 

され︑資料︑バッジ︑名札等を受領する︒ 

参加費  会員 

一 ︑八 00 円 

会員 五 00 円  として登録  三 日 ︵土︶ 

一日︵月︶ 

四日︵木︶ 

九日︵火︶ 

  

  

教 

  

イス 

  

㌔ 

  " 

一一 

  

  

     

  

  

  

  

別表 

口 登録と同時に次の費用も受付ける︒ 

参加者懇親会費 三 00 円 

さきに参加を申込んだ者 

ぬ 産経会館午後五時 | 七時 

紀要予約約二︑ 

000 円 ︵予定︶ っ 希望 王巴 

㈲開会式 

コ 八月二八日︵木︶午前九時三 分| 一二時 

口 

場所東京産経会館 

Ⅱ参加者は午前九時一五分までに入場すること︒ 

㈲本会議 

口 八月二八日︵木︶・ リヨ 日 ︵土︶ 

口 

場所東京産経会館 

口木会議の主題は﹁過去及び現在における東洋の ︵ 刃 ︶ 5 ︶ 0 口目汁 ヴの いのの 圧| Ⅰが ゅ 吟曲 ヰら ⅠⅠ のの ロャ ︶ 

但し他の題目を含まれている︒ 

本会議日程 

案  宗教︑ である 

IO5 (1 鏑 ) 

     

  

  

  

口芭ヨ の音田内包とより成り︑研究発表が行われる︒ 

口部会は右の四部会に分れる︒ 

  

録 

の際︑参加者全員に配布する︒ 

口 研究発表の時間は二 分 ︑質問時間は五分とする︒ 

  

録 

の際 提出する︒ 

㈲関東地域研究調査 

  

   り なる︒ 

  

     

意義と日信仰11       

  

本堂 

  

  

  

     

  

  

質疑応答が行われる︒   

㏄ 八月三一日︵日︶ 

ル において行われる︒  日日光地域研究調査 

  

    

  

こと︒ 

九月一日︵月︶ 日東京地域研究調査 

  

る ︒討論会終了後バスで出発する︒ 

参加者は午前八時五 分 までに会場に入場すること︒ 

九月一日︵月︶ 口 鎌倉地域研究調査 

  

われる︒討論会終了後バスで出発する︒ 

参加者は午前八時五 分 まで 仁 会場に入場すること︒ 

  

る︐ 

研究 謂杢 旅行論文︵勾のの mpq 臼 宮 Ⅰ づ の 口 mn の︶ 

  

     

     

  

  

  

  

リサーチガイドブック編集様式 案 1省略 

モ 

第二部 

シソポジウム 

ロ 九月二日︵火︶ | 四日︵木︶ 

口 

場所東京産経会館 

  年     

Ⅹの ワ 甘口 帆 ︶     

全体会議では︑会員は討論に参加することができる︒  鎌倉鶴岡八幡宮岡田実八幡信仰の推移    長谷大仏白井永二鎌倉時代の宗教芸術 

    

総持寺古田  紹欽禅 

について   

  

  ・   

浅池 

草  木 上 

且 

戸 l J 

寺  寺 

        

  

      豆  正女戒  笘  小口  偉  一一新宗教の成立とその特質 

  

   靖国神立岩本徳一一教派神道の現状 

  

  

  れを傍聴する︒日程及び主題は次の通りである︒ ゆ適い田 い方︶ 

宇 

轄靱か沸 ︵ 

寮 

田尾のの 卸 色 

き︒ 目 8  秒 軽妙 甦玲鰍口浅へ 紅色︒ し 

  

  甘 

サ ︶ づゴ ののすぎの り ︵ ︵ ず ︵ ざの oh O0 ゑ 隼の局︵ 注 

の甲孝仁Ⅰ の 

コ戸 

: 

や PN か o  檸 分離 

  

  

巨 ︵ ダの 由 俺珪 

しづゴ の出口角 屈 局 の oM の す Ⅰぢ圧 ざ圧圧 Ⅱ 臣 圧すの 

串ガ呂 

母 1 58  五皿 理鰍 ︵ わ OE ゴ 耳学〜の曳の目のの wO 口 ︶ 

  

緩 いム Ⅰ め 曲のぬ︵ はⅠ の の アヨン ゆの珪の七二苦Ⅰ 俺トの は | 

神曲 圧の 

  

  

コ襯探 ︵目の三日 ros 

  

圧| 

の Ⅰ 局守 が曲 らのら年の下村ぢ圧 ざ 巨守 曲曲 口恥 局侍はの 卑 w ︒ 口 ︵ 

  

    

     

    

  

  

  

  

0 臣ゎ  00  捺  0  ゴ  0%  丹色の月孝仁Ⅱの  0 口ロ  目あヰ  呑口〜圧せ  ⅠⅡ u トや旺笘 

  

血  ㏄  回  ︵ らハ  ︶  1  %W  丼め鰐  剖回理鰐  0  盤  %   台  ?  と  58  1目  8   秒  暁め鰐 

  

   ハソ俺宇  6 Occ  ロ ︵Ⅰ て Ⅱ  目  ︵  ヴ ︶  日ヲの  ⅠⅠ  め岸  0 局  ︒の  0 Ⅰ  0  Ⅰ げけ圧め  ︶  オ  0 目彊  0 巨の  0 局  ︵ アの  On  ゑ年  0 口︵ 

  

おの 

  

  

  

ト  ロⅠⅡ  おざ曲  0 局  0 用  0  由  0 局圧住  の百方  耳  Ⅰのの 

  

   笘廿由  00  由江  0 口  圧 自オ  の 二四  0 屈の・  H  オ o  眉ぬ  ︶︶︵の 

  

Ⅱ ロ 円 O ツー 目 

寸口  臼  のし  0 Ⅱ  缶  0 ㌧山口㏄  毛  oH  左の  ロ ゑ目ぬの曲  0 目 

  

目 ︶ 

     

の凄 仁田︵ 汁 ︶ 

匡 

1 %  坤藍翔鰍 

剖匝理鰐 離 %  安1さ 

の 1目 8 W 丼ル灘 

  

    ︵ 0  の三丹 佳邑 口印 の Ⅰの︵のは出口 

コ 1 は Ao  コ皿理鰐 

  

  口洋岸 qp ロ 口口 ︵海の臣出口 鯉 ののⅠの ゑめけ ⅡⅠ 臣 口口仁 の曲 臣     の届岸岸 Ⅰの〜ロロⅠ Ⅰの侍ひロロ︶ 目 ㏄・ のⅠ 09 色〜Ⅱ〜は 

Ⅰ 的り日色丹 0. 日へ ︵︶ 由 ㌧ 苗 00     目 耳目Ⅱの ロ 局由 Ⅰの圧のけ出口内 ヰ圧オ 0 0 二のは 田 い巨 Ⅰ 曲 由 局圧     Ⅰ局の︶ 持 崩ぜⅠ口内 す 斗が 神のⅡ げ曲 の 市 ユ 0% 叶曲 〜 

ひ 目色 ORm&o 目ヰ芭のⅠ お屈 Ⅰ のの 局 Ⅰ し 目の局曲目的 

プ 丹田井口ロ ロ ト隼 Ⅰの田のロロロロ 幅   のの 甲燵 帝日㏄︒片刃の︒の ヨヨ 臣隼笘ヱ ︒臣の片︒ 

Cz しのの 

し 1 ま 8  機 丼ル灘 

下口 ロヰ 口 oM 力 Ro ヨヨ 口 守ヱ Ⅰの︵ oC 之 内のの 

二  デ 

ト q8 % 糖乳︵ ︒乱臣 ゆ紺お no こ     ㏄   ㏄     

  

天     調 

査        

口  口  口 く 1) 笛   

  

平平 杜 

後域  八、 

九九 

置  マ 

おに王父 

   令息 

お  木 

閑院  い  部 

行わ 

る 

。 

㈲公開講演会 

ロ 九月八日︵月︶午後五時三 分 

口 

場所関西電力ホール  ㈲閉会式 

  ロ 九月九日︵火︶午前一 時三 分| 一二時 (109 口 

場所京都大学 

㏄   

      一項  撞 

奈 

  

京都  良        法隆  王佐伯  良謙  聖徳太子と法隆寺 

    

限  することがある︒ 

  

と  決定しました︒  ︵岡田  記り 

  

は  ︑十二万円 

配布を ぅ げる︒ 

六  五 

単文革  、  に、 

」  ノ 」 と 

金仏会は 

員  ぅ  員で 

はもは 

"  の  "  き な 

   グる 

う 

。 

と し  ム "   て 金 

発  五 

表  O 

論  O 

文  月 

  

加  セ 

昔  日 

名  登 

簿  銭 

尊  め 

の  際 

  

  に 開催 

  

つ︑︑ Ⅰ 

ては特によろしくお願いいたします︒    

  

  て登 

録しなければならない︒   閉   完 調  査 旅行には参加できない︒   する  本号 記事 ユ ー 

国際 

られ  は 国際会議直前に発行 

‑ をかなり詳細に収録し 

か 等をあらかじめお 含 

会議前に次号まで発行 

たこと等のため遅延 し 

て  の  み  ま  し おき 下  した︒  ますの 

予定で 

おりま  で︑彙報には会議関係の これにより会議のスケジ さい 

したが︑経費の制約に迫 

す ︒お知らせのように 本      

一  ︑国際宗教学宗教史会議に準会員を置く︒ 

  

よる 

     固捺 宗教学宗教史会話半金具に関する規定 

   同会議に正会員の資格においてでなく参加を           のです︒  又  この機会  こ更 こ本文においても  打  数︑ 

口 半金 

俺の捧 カ  申  込 

つ 

い  て 

  

編  集  後 

ま巳 

Ⅰ 

(HO)@ no    

  

  

信楽の立場 

  

  

  

執簗者 

棚瀬襄礒 

山崎 

亨 

石田慶和  山形孝夫 

諸 

同素 

純 

  

竜谷大学教授 

同志社大学教授 

京都大学助手 

策北 

大学大学院 

大阪市立大学教授  ︵博士課程︶ 

紹介 

  

     

哲学しに於ても  ︵ お  ︶教行信証方便化身上巻三三九頁 

      

  卸 

The Fundamental Structure of Religion Jbji TANASE

.

k o m the start, science of Religion endeavoured to grasp or to define

"Religion" a s the whole in general term. E. B. Tylor's minimum defini- tion is a good example. But this is a very difficult task. We must take under view a11 religions, its essence, its manifestations, and all its historical or dynamic phases. Some scholars seek religion in its naive form ad reject its institutional form, ,but we must include all aspects

of religion.

The hypothetical definition of religion which I want to propose in this paper is that religion is one of the culture items. which tries superrational adjustment. As my aim in this paper is in the understand- ing of the dynamic structure of religion, this definition is explanatory one. As you see, in his definition, the dynamic concept of culture i s introduced. "Superrational" means rational plus. Adjustment means cultural adaptation. Therefore it stands on the anthropocentric point of view, but it does not stand on philosophical humanism. Religion is a kind of human behavior, and human behavior is understood a s the bridge between disequilibrium and equilibrium.

If we want to analyse the superrational adjustment, we must divide the religious situation or religious ground and the religious method.

In the ~eligious situation, a religious method in acquired, and t h e religious method abolishes the situation.

The religious situation is able to grasp in psychological or philo- sophical term such a s fear, unrest, powerlessness or crises. But to ex- plain the varieties of religious phenomena, it is of use to attract attep- tion to the causes which have given rise the situation. Environmental, ' organic, socio-cultural and reflective situation may be cite$. The first three are partial and superficial, and the last are wholly and essen-

tial. The religious methods may be classified to the outward method and the inward method. In the former, man is not changed, human desire is allowed, and in this type the notion of the holy is character- istic. In the latter reconstruction of humanity is aimed at. I think the definition of religion a s the sacred can be applied to the former type and that of religion as revaluation of values can be applied to the latter type, but both types can be grasped a s the superrational adjust- ment. Generally speaking, superficial situations ,are related to the outward methods, and reflective situations to the inward methods.

Superrational adjustment may be socialized as the other items of cul- ture. Thus religious institution is not independent. It is a part of an integral culture.

About the God Most High in the Old Testament

Although 'el elyon" in Gen. 14 : 18 is usually translated a s "the God Most High", the original meaning must be examined and searched from the stand point of the text criticism and cultural background.

(1) The Text of Gen. 14: 18-20 belongs to P source by Gunkel (Gene- sis, 1910). According to Albright (The Archaeology of Palestine and the Bible, 1935), the text is from the special source, which originated from Mesopotamia valley by Oesterley and Robinson (An Intro., 1934).

According to Pfeiffer (Intro., 1948), the text belongs to the secondary source of S. The poetic form resembles to the S source but theological content must be much later than S, and probably about fifth century B. C.

(2) So called Sefir6-Soudjin document of which translation is found in the periodical of ZAW, 1932, s. 178ff

.,

presents before us that el and elyon are the gods worshipped among the Canaanites. The articles by

Cantineau (Revue d'assyriologie, 1931), Eissfeldt (1932) and Montgo- mery

(HI

Th. R., mori, l938) threw light upon this point.

(3) According to the document of Sanchunjaton, elyun is called a s . Hypsistos (the Highest). L

(4) The God Aledon in Ras Shamra tablets seems to be a different form of elyon.

On the Essential Significance of "Shin-gy6"

Yoshikazu. ISHIDA

In his main work "Ky8-yo-shin-sham, Shniran makes clear his unique concept of "Shin-gy6"

(Es)

which means faith with joy literally.

The concept of faith, however, does not explain the true significance of "Shin-gyh", because i t implies the absolute subordination to the absolute. That is to say, faith presupposes the absolute disparity between the relative and the absolute, while the concept of "Shingyh"

has still more profound significance in it.

We know that the J6do-shin sect of Buddhism has produced a group of earnest lay-devotees called "My8k8-nin"(@EA). We can realize the true significance of the concept of "Shid-gy8" through their expres- sions which reniain very few but show their profound spiritual lives clearly.

One of them says that he is unified with "Shin-jin"(@,G), the pure and faithful mind given from Buddha Amiabha, or he is "Shin-jin"

itself or he become in a body with Buddha Amitlbha, nay Buddha ' ArnitQbha becomes himself. These expressions can not be expressed from the feelings of subordination to the absolute, I think. They prove that the far more profound dimension is open in their spiritual lives which derived from Shinran's teachings.

Shinran teaches us in the "Ky6-gy6-shin-sh6" that the only way to go and be born in the Pure Land of Buddha Amitlbha is not by the

4

faith which we may have in our minds but by the pure and true

"Shingya" gived from Buddha Amiabha. This teaching distinguishes him.from other patriarches of the JMo sect who were Honen's dis- ciples.

According to Shinran's original explanations of "KangyG-so", the c o m e n t a r y of "Kan-muryGju-kyG" by ZendG, the true significance of

"Shinjin", which is nothing but "ShingyG", is understood from two

*

, points of view. The one is the deep faith to the Dharma which es- tablished the salvation of mankind by the 48th Vow of Buddha Ami- tiibha, the other is also the deep faith of having sins which makes us reiterate transmigrations. The "~hinjin" implies these two deep faith a s its essential significance, so -it can not be understood from the ' dimension on which the feelings of the absolute subordination seem to be based. "Shin-jin" or "Shin-gyG" reveals itself where this dimension is broken through, that is, where the absolute disparity between the relative and the absolute is surpassed throughly not by the relative but by the absolute.

'The Problem of "die hermeneut ische Situation"

and the Idea of Existence.

Takao YAMAGATA

\ After the Second World War there took place a further develop- ment in theological thought, and of this we have taken Rudolf Bult;

mann a s representative. It would be a complete misunderstanding to think that Bultmann7s theological thought bas gone back to the atti- , tude which prevailed before Barth. 0x1 the contrary, he accepts with Barth the Kerygma, the revealed Word of God, a s the foundation of Christian theology. But a s he sees it, the Kerygma is always under- stood in the answering situation of faith, and i t is in that actual situation that it is to be interpreted. Hence, Bultmann takes the ex-&

ドキュメント内 『宗教研究』156号(32巻1輯) (ページ 106-117)

関連したドキュメント