• 検索結果がありません。

PDF 1 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian for the Dirac equation - Tokai University

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

シェア "PDF 1 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian for the Dirac equation - Tokai University"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

1 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian for the Dirac equation

The Dirac equations for ψ(x) and ψ(x)

(i6∂−m)ψ(x) = 0, ψ(x)

−i

6∂ −m

= 0 (1.1)

can be derived form the following Lagrangian density:

L=ψ(i6∂−m)ψ(x) = ψ(iγµµ−m)ψ (1.2) Show this: The action, as a functional of the independent fieldsψ and ψ and their derivatives, is:

S = Z

d4xL ψ, ∂µψ;ψ, ∂µψ

(1.3) Under arbitrary (infinitesimal) variation of the fields, the variation of the action is then

δ S = Z

d4x δL= Z

d4x

"

∂L

∂ψδψ+ ∂L

∂(∂µψ)δ(∂µψ) + ∂L

∂ψδψ+ ∂L

∂ ∂µψδ ∂µψ

#

(1.4) Usingδ(∂µψ) = ∂µ(δψ) in the second term, and δ ∂µψ

=∂µ δψ

in the fourth term, and perform- ing partial integrations, we get

δ S = Z

d4x

"

∂L

∂ψ −∂µ ∂L

∂(∂µψ)

δψ+ ∂L

∂ψ −∂µ ∂L

∂ ∂µψ

! δψ

#

Because the variational principle δS = 0 must hold for arbitrary variations δψ and δψ, we obtain the “Euler-Lagrange equations”

∂L

∂ψ −∂µ ∂L

∂(∂µψ)

= 0, ∂L

∂ψ −∂µ ∂L

∂ ∂µψ

!

= 0 (1.5)

Using the Lagrangian density (1.7), the equations (1.5) are identical to the Dirac equations (1.1).

Note that the Lagrangian (1.7) is a scalar under Lorentz transformations and parity transformations.

In the Hamiltonian formulation, one uses the “canonical momenta”

Πψ = ∂L

∂ψ˙ =iψ, Πψ = ∂L

∂ψ˙ = 0

instead of the time derivatives ˙ψ and ˙ψ. The Legendre transformation from the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian is then given by

H = Πψψ˙+ Πψψ˙− L=iψψ˙−iψψ˙ −ψ iγii−m ψ

= ψ

0~γ·∇~ +γ0m

ψ =ψ

~

α·~pˆ+βm

ψ =ψH ψ (1.6)

1

(2)

where H = ~α·~pˆ+βm is the usual Dirac Hamiltonian. If we insert here our positive and negative energy solutions (see No. 3)

ψ(+)(~x, t) = 1

√ V

rm

Ep u(~p, s)e−i(Ept−~p·~x)/~

ψ(−)(~x, t) = 1

√V rm

Ep v(−~p, s)ei(Ept+~p·~x)/~

we get the obvious resultsH=Ep/V for the positive energy case, and H=−Ep/V for the negative energy case.

Form of the Lagrangian density including an external electromagnetic field Aµ =

φ, ~A

: L = ψ(i6∂−m−q6A)ψ =L0−q ψγµψ

Aµ (1.7)

The Euler-Lagrange equations (1.5) then give the Dirac equations in an external field (see No. 8).

The interaction part of the Lagrangian density (1.7) has the characteristic formLI =−qjµAµ, where q is the electric charge.

Following this example, one can “guess” the interaction Lagrangians for other types of interactions.

For example, in the case of an external pion field (π(x)), a possible form of the interaction Lagrangian is:

LI =−ig ψγ5ψ

π(x) (1.8)

Reason: Because the pion has negative parity (π(−~x, t) = π(~x, t)), it must couple to the pseudo- scalar “current” ψγ5ψ (see No. 4), so that the Lagrangian is a scalar. (The factor i is necessary for hermiticity.) The constant g is called a coupling constant. The interaction (1.8) is called a

“pseudo-scalar interaction”.

However, there is also another possible interaction Lagrangian of the form LI =g0 ψγ5γµψ

(∂µπ(x)) (1.9)

Hereψγ5γµψ is a pseudo-vector (see No. 4), and∂µπ(x) is also a pseudo-vector. This form is called a “pseudo-vector interaction”. In the general case, the interaction Lagrangian for pions and nucleons (or quarks) is a sum of both terms (1.8) and (1.9).

2

参照

関連したドキュメント

The maximum‑minimum theorem is important because it is possible to deduce

Optimal impulsive harvest policy for constant effort harvest Now, we consider single population X of size N(t), which obeys the logistic growth law, is impulsively harvested by means

In this article, we present the optimal control for the modified Swift-Hohenberg equation, under certain boundary conditions, and show the existence of an optimal solution.. u 0 (x)

In many applications such as signal processing and robust sta- bility analysis, it is important to find reasonable bounds for summations including the trace, and for products

It is possible now to describe the second algorithm to test bridging faults for different values of Rf as follow: For each external/internal inter-gate or intra-gate bridging

Similar to the Klein-Gordon case, we call the solution with E = +E p the “positive frequency solution”, and the other with E = −E p the “negative

boundary decay rate of g may vary at each boundary point when \partial $\Omega$ is non‐ smooth, whereas gx is comparable to the distance function $\delta$_{ $\Omega$}x

initial time $s\in I$ and any initial condition $x(s)=y\in\Omega$ , with the solution (characteristic. function) $x=\Phi_{t,s}(y)\in\Omega$ existing for