• 検索結果がありません。

On hypersurfaces of the semi-symmetric classes in a real space form

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "On hypersurfaces of the semi-symmetric classes in a real space form"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

実空間型内の準対称類超曲面について

On hypersurfaces of the semi-symmetric classes in a real space form

数学専攻 王 慧峰

Huifeng Wang

Let ˜ M

n+1

(c) be an (n+1)-dimensional real space form with constant curvature c (i.e. complete, simply connected Riemannian manifold with constant sectional curvature, say c). For each real number c and each integer n > 1 there is (up to isometry) exactly one n-dimensional real space form with constant curvature c.

The real space forms are:

(1) If c = 0, then ˜ M

n+1

(c) is an Euclidean space E

n+1

. (2) If c < 0, then ˜ M

n+1

(c) is a real hyperbolic space H

n+1

(c).

(3) If c > 0, then ˜ M

n+1

(c) is an Euclidean sphere S

n+1

(c) .

Let f : M

n

−→ M ˜

n+1

(c) be an isometric immersion of an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold M

n

in ˜ M

n+1

(c). For simplicity, we say that M

n

is a hypersurface immersed in ˜ M

n+1

(c), and for all local formulas and computations, we may consider f as an imbedding and thus identify x M with f (x) M ˜

n+1

(c). The tangent space T

x

(M ) is identified with a subspace of the tangent space T

x

( ˜ M ), and the normal space T

x

is the subspace of T

x

( ˜ M ) consisting of all X T

x

( ˜ M ) which are orthogonal to T

x

(M ) with respect to the Riemannian metric g.

For an arbitrary point x

0

M

n

, we may choose a field ξ of unit normal vectors defined in a neighborhood U of x

0

. The second fundamental form h and the corresponding symmetric opreator A are defined and related to covariant differentiations ˜ and in ˜ M

n+1

(c) and M

n

, respectively, by the following formulas:

˜

X

Y =

X

Y + h(X, Y ), (1)

˜

X

ξ = −AX, (2)

where X and Y are vector fields tangent to M

n

. The Gauss equation is:

R(X, Y ) = c(X Y ) + AX AY, X, Y T

x

(M ), (3)

1

(2)

where X Y denotes the skew-symmetric endomorphism of T

x

(M ). And The Codazzi equation is expressed by

(∇

X

A)(Y ) = (∇

Y

A)(X ). (4)

M

n

is called a locally symmetric space if the curvature tensor R of M

n

satisfies

∇R = 0.

For example, a piece of the product of two spaces with constant curvature is a locally symmetric space. Then it is naturally considered the question whether M

n

is ∇R = 0 under the weaker condition of

R(X, Y ) · R = 0

for all tangent vectors X and Y than ∇R = 0. With regard to this, Nomizu[2]

proved the following: Let M be an n-dimensional, connected, complete Rie- mannian manifold which is isometrically immersed in a Euclidean space R

n+1

so that the type number k is greater than 2 at least at one point. If M satisfies the condition of R(X, Y ) · R = 0, then it is of the form M = S

k

× R

n−k

, where S

k

is a hypersphere in a Euclidean subspace R

k+1

of R

n+1

and R

n−k

is a Eu- clidean subspace orthogonal to R

k+1

.

When c 6= 0 and M

n

is a hypersurface in ˜ M

n+1

(c), n > 2, with R(X, Y )·R = 0, either rankA = n for any x M or rankA 1 for any x M . Assume that the hypothesis as above and in addition that at each point exactly two principal curvatures are distinct and have multiplicities > 1. Then M is locally isometric to a product of two spaces with constant curvature.

Moreover, we shall assume that M is oriented (so that a unit normal vector field ξ is defined on the whole M ) and that the type number k(x) is greater than 3 everywhere on M . It is known that the function k(x) is locally constant and hence is a constant, say k, since M is connected. We may also speak of the differentiable function λ(x) which assings to each x M the non-zero eigenvalue of A at x.

Thus, at each x M , λ(x) is the non-zero eigenvalue of A with multiplicity k and 0 is the eigenvalue with multiplicity n k. We define two distributions on M as follows:

2

(3)

T

0

(x) = {X T

x

(M ); AX = 0}, T

λ

(x) = {X T

x

(M ); AX = λ(x)X }.

We have T

x

(M ) = T

0

(x) + T

λ

(x) (direct sum). For any Z T

x

(M ), Z

0

and Z

λ

will denote the components of Z in T

0

(x) and T

λ

(x), respectively. We prepare the following Lemmas without proof.

Lemma 1. T

0

and T

λ

are differentiable.

Lemma 2. T

0

and T

λ

are involutive.

Lemma 3. If X belongs to T

λ

(x), then = 0.

Lemma 4. If X T

λ

, Y T

0

, then A(∇

X

Y ) = −(Y λ)X . Lemma 5. (1)If Y T

0

, then

Y

(T

λ

) T

λ

.

(2)If Y T

0

, then

Y

(T

0

) T

0

.

(3)If Y T

0

, X T

λ

and [X, Y ] = 0, then

X

Y T

λ

.

Lemma 6. If Y λ = 0 for every Y T

0

, then X T

λ

implies

X

(T

0

) T

0

and

X

(T

λ

) T

λ

.

Lemma 7. Let Y and Z be vector fields belonging to T

0

such that

Y

Z =

Z

Y = 0. If there is a non-vanishing vector field X belonging to T

λ

such that [X, Y ] = [X, Z] = 0, then (Y Z )( 1

λ ) = 0.

If the curvature tensor R of the riemannian manifold M satisfies

R(X, Y ) · R = a(X Y ) · R

for any tangent vector X and Y, then M is called semi-symmetric classes where a is constant and X Y is defined by (X Y )Z = g(Y, Z)X g(X, Z)Y .

The purpose of this paper is to classify hypersurfaces of semi-symmetric classes in a real space form. We notice that this condition is weaker than R(X, Y )R = 0.

We prove the following theorem.

Theorem. Let M

n

be a complete hypersurface in M ˜

n+1

(c). We assume that a is a non-zero constant. If M

n

is not of constant curvature c and if R(X, Y )R = a(X Y )R on M

n

, then M

n

is totally umbilical and a space form.

The author would like to express his sincere gratitude to Professor Y.

Matsuyama for his valuable suggestions during the preparation of this paper.

3

(4)

References

[1] B. Y. Chen, Geometry of Submanifold, New York, Dekker(1973)

[2] Katsumi. Nomizu, On hypersurfaces satisfying a certain condition on the curvature tensor, (Received August 22, 1967)

[3] S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of differential geometry, Vol. II, Interscience Tracts No. 15, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1963).

[4] K. Nomizu and B. Smyth, A formula of simons’ type and hypersurfaces with constant mean curvature, J. Differential Geometry, 3(1969)367-377 [5] Patrick J. Ryan, Homogeneity and some curvature conditions for hypersur-

faces, Tohoku Math. Journ, 21(1969), 363-388

[6] Patrick J. Ryan, Hypersurfaces with parallel ricci tensor, Osaka J. Math.

8(1971), 251-259

[7] YOSHIO MATSUYAMA, Complete Hypersurfaces With RS = 0 In E

n+1

, Proceedings of The American Mathematical Society, Volume 88, Number 1,May 1983

[8] Norifumi Yokoyama and Yoshio Matsuyama, On a Kaehler Hypersurface with the Cyclic Ricci Semi-symmetric Tensor, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, Oct.,2009, Vol.25, No.10, pp.1591-1594

Department of Mathematics Chuo University 1-13-27 Kasuga Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 112-8551 Japan

4

参照

関連したドキュメント

Kirchheim in [14] pointed out that using a classical result in function theory (Theorem 17) then the proof of Dacorogna–Marcellini was still valid without the extra hypothesis on E..

Since we are interested in bounds that incorporate only the phase individual properties and their volume fractions, there are mainly four different approaches: the variational method

Later, in [1], the research proceeded with the asymptotic behavior of solutions of the incompressible 2D Euler equations on a bounded domain with a finite num- ber of holes,

We give a new proof of a theorem of Kleiner–Leeb: that any quasi-isometrically embedded Euclidean space in a product of symmetric spaces and Euclidean buildings is contained in a

Zograf , On uniformization of Riemann surfaces and the Weil-Petersson metric on Teichm¨ uller and Schottky spaces, Math. Takhtajan , Uniformization, local index theory, and the

We study the existence and uniqueness of solutions and nonlocal controllability for the impulsive semilinear nonlocal fuzzy integrodifferential equations in n-dimensional fuzzy

(Furthermore, a bound on the number of elementary matrices can be found that depends only on n, and is universal for all fields.) In the case of fields, this can easily be

We note that in the case m = 1, the class K 1,n (D) properly contains the classical Kato class K n (D) introduced in [1] as the natural class of singular functions which replaces the