9 2021 3
Effectiveness of flipped classroom with online teaching during the COVID-19 epidemic
Ako OKUDA
Center for Language Studies, Nagasaki University
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced teaching pedagogies worldwide. Most universities in Japan have adopted online teaching and learning as a substitute for a face-to-face class. A large number of language teachers, who utilize traditional classroom instruction, have been forced to change their teaching style to fit online classes.
Regarding online instructions, they are also not provided with effective teaching strategies and skills. The purpose of this study is to examine what differences can be found in the output in writing by Japanese college learns of English in online flipped and face-to-face flipped classroom settings. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the online flipped class, data was collected from two different sources: a final exam and a questionnaire. The findings of the analyses of the obtained data suggest that the online flipped class approach facilitates dialogic learning through peer instruction and conversation between the students.
Keywords:
1.
2020 5 20 890
3.1% 7 1
16.2%
Zoom Webex Web
MOOC , 2018
, 2014 2015
, 2016
2.
Guo, 2017; Sataline, 2013; , 2015; , 2018
2016
Zoom
3.
4.
2018 1 43
2020 1 38
1 TOEIC
Utsunomiya et al. 2016 2011 2015 TOEIC
2014 356 362
2018 2015
378 388
2018 2020
1
1.
1 2
1:
2:
3 5
3: e-mail
4: 4
5: formal informal
6 7
6:
7: 3
8 13
8:
9: 4
10: 6
11:
12:
13: 8 ~12
14 14:
15 15:
1 10
, 2019
10
LMS LACS Learning Assessment and Communication System
, 2016
5
2020 1 2018 2020
1 e-mail e-mail
Zoom
2018 2020 30
1
e-mail e-mail
2018 2020 LACS
2020 Zoom
LACS
2018 2020
5% t 15
3 1: 2: 3:
4: 5: 6: 7:
7 5%
t
5.
2 2 2
L 63.23 J 72.45
10 t
p=0.002 p<.01 2 p
d=0.71 2.
t
2018 (L) 43 63.23 14.89 p = 0.002 d=0.71
2020 (J) 38 72.45 10.36
d d = 0.2 d = 0.5 d = 0.8
2 L
J
2.
1
2
3 2020
3 5 3 5
3.
3.
t
2018 (L) 36 5.81 0.82 p = 0.001 d=0.79
2020 (J) 38 5.03 1.13
d d = 0.2 d = 0.5 d = 0.8
3 5.81
5.08
p p=0.001 p<.05
4.
4.
t
2018 (L) 36 5.64 0.93 p = 0.054 d=0.45
2020 (J) 38 5.18 1.06
d d = 0.2 d = 0.5 d = 0.8
0.46 p p=0.054 p>.05
d=0.45 2008
1
5.
5.
t
2018 (L) 35 6.49 0.82 p = 0.000 d=1.79
2020 (J) 38 4.42 1.30
d d = 0.2 d = 0.5 d = 0.8
5
6.49 4.42
5
d=0.8 d=1.79
2020
6.
2016 57(1), 109-113.
Guo, M. S. (2017). Investigating the Effect of the Flipped Classroom using E-learning English Language Learners. 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies
, , , 2016
40 (Suppl) 161-164.
, , 2016
40 (Suppl) 009-012.
2018 GLM G-
TELP TOEIC 2011
2016 6, 33-51.
2015
52-57 2015
Sataline, S. (2013). 3 Ways colleges are adapting to online learning. U.S. News &
World Report
website:https://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/2013/09/
, , 2019 MOOC 42 (3) 255-269.
, 2016 ,
40(Suppl.) 45-48.
2018 52 (1) 37-52.
2008 LMS 4 51-52.
2018 , 42 (3)
191-200
Yuzuru Utsunomiya, Masazumi Maruyama, Shinji Ogasawara (2016). Estimating TOEIC scores using G-TELP scores: A Bayesian Model in a Japanese National University. JLTA Journal, Volume 19, 27-45.
