• 検索結果がありません。

ON CERTAIN MEROMORPHIC P-VALENT FUNCTIONS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "ON CERTAIN MEROMORPHIC P-VALENT FUNCTIONS"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

ON

CERTAIN MEROMORPHIC

$\mathrm{P}$

-VALENT FUNCTIONS

JINLIN LIU

AND

SHIGEYOSHI

OWA

(

揚州大学

)

(

近畿大学

.

理工)

ABSTRACT.

A certain

differential

operator

$D^{n}$

is

introduced for

functions

of

the form

$f(z)= \frac{1}{z^{\mathrm{p}}}+\sum$$k=0\infty$

akz

k

which

are

analytic

$\mathrm{m}E^{\mathrm{x}}=\{z :

0<|z|<1\}$

.

The object of the

present

paper is to

glve

an

application

of the above

operator

$D^{n}$

to

the differential

inequalities.

Keywords. Analytic,

$\mathrm{p}-$

-valent, meromorphic.

1.

INTRODUCTION

Let

$\Sigma(p)$

denote the class of

functions

of the form

$f(z)= \frac{1}{z^{p}}+.\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}ak\mathcal{Z}k$

$(p\in \mathrm{N}=\{1,2, \cdots\})$

which

are

analytic in

$E^{*}=\{z :

0<|z|<1\}$

.

Define

$D^{0}f(z)=f(z)$

$D^{1}f(z)= \frac{1}{z^{p}}+(p+1)a_{0}+(p+2)a_{1}Z+(p+3)a_{2}z^{2}+\cdots$

$D^{2}f(z)=D(\acute{D}^{1}f(z))$

and

for

$n=1,2,$

$\cdots$

$D^{n}f(z)=D(D^{n-1}f(Z))= \frac{1}{z^{p}}+\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}(p+m)^{nm}a_{m}-1z-1$

.

Recently Uralegaddi

and

Somanatha

[1] and

Aouf

and

Hossen

[

$2\mathrm{J}$

have studied

certain

claes

of meromorphic multivalent functions

defined

by the operator

$D^{n}f(z)$

.

The object

of the

present

paper

is

to investigate

some

new

properties of

meromor-phic p–valent

functions defined

by the above operator.

$AMS$

(1991) Subject

Ciassification.

$30\mathrm{C}45$

Typeset by

$A_{\mathcal{M}}\theta\tau \mathrm{x}\mathrm{x}$

数理解析研究所講究録

(2)

Definition.

Let

$H$

be the set

of

complex

valued functions

$h(r, s, t)$

:

$\mathbb{C}^{3}arrow \mathbb{C}(\mathbb{C}$

is

the complex

plane)

such

that

(1.1)

$h(r, s, t)$

is

continuous in

a

domain

$D\subset \mathbb{C}^{3}$

;

(1.2)

$(1, 1, 1)\in D$

and

$|h(1,1,1)|<1$

;

(1.3)

$|h(e^{i\theta}, m+e^{i\theta}, \frac{m+L+3mei\theta+e2i\theta}{m+e^{i\theta}})|\geq 1$

,

whenever

$(e^{i\theta}, m+ei \theta, \frac{m+L+3me^{i}+\theta e2i\theta}{m+e^{i\theta}})\in D$

with

${\rm Re} L\geq m(m-1)$

for

real

$\theta$

and for real

$m\geq 1$

.

2. MAIN RESULT

In proving our

main

result,

we

shall need the following lemma due to Miller and

Mocanu

[3].

Lemma.

Let

$w(z)=a+w_{k^{Z^{k}}}+\cdots$

be analytic in

$E=\{z:|z|<1\}$

with

$w(z)\not\equiv a$

and

$k\geq 1$

.

If

$z_{0}=r_{0}e^{i\theta}(0<r_{0}<1)$

and

$|w(z \mathrm{o})|=|\max_{z|\leq r0}|w(Z)|$

,

then

(2.1)

$z_{\Theta}w’(Z_{0})=mw(_{\sim 0}7)$

and

(2.2)

${\rm Re} \{1+\frac{z_{0}w’’(\sim r0)}{w(_{\mathcal{Z}_{0}})},\}\geq m$

,

where

$m$

is

real and

$m \geq k\frac{|w(z_{0})-a|\underline{r)}}{|w(z_{0})|^{2}-|a|^{\mathrm{o}}\sim}\geq k\frac{|w(_{\wedge}\vee)0|-|a|}{|w(z_{0})|+|a|}$

.

Theorem. Let

$h(r, S, t)\in H$

and

let

$f(z)$

belonging

to

$\Sigma(p)$

satisfy

(2.3)

$( \frac{D^{n}f(z)}{D^{n-1}f(z)} , \frac{D^{n+1}f(z)}{D^{n}f(z)}, \frac{D^{n+2}f(z)}{D^{n+1}f(z)})\in D\subset \mathbb{C}^{3}$

and

(2.4)

$|h( \frac{D^{n}f(z)}{D^{n-1}f(z)}, \frac{D^{n+1}f(z)}{D^{n}f(_{\wedge}\gamma)}, \frac{D^{n+2}f(z)}{D^{n+1}f(z)})|<1$

for

all

$z\in E.$

Then

we

have

$| \frac{D^{n}f(z)}{D^{n-1}f(z)}|<1$

$(z\in E)$

.

Proof.

Let

$\frac{D^{n}f(z)}{D^{n-1}f(z)}=w(z)$

,

(3)

then

it

follows that

$w(z)$

is

either

analytic

or

meromorphic

in

$E,$

$w(\mathrm{O})=1$

and

$w(z)\not\equiv 1$

.

With the

aid

of the

identity (easy to

verify)

$z(D^{n}f(z))’=D^{n}+1f(Z)-(p+1)D^{n}f(_{Z)}$

,

we

obtain

$\frac{D^{n+1}f(z)}{D^{n}f(z)}=w(Z)+\frac{zw’(z)}{w(z)}$

$\frac{D^{n+2}f(z)}{D^{n+1}f(z)}=w(z)+\frac{zw’(_{\sim}\prime)}{w(z)}+\frac{zw’(_{Z)}+\frac{zw’(z)}{w\langle z)}+\frac{z^{2}w’’(z)}{w(z)}-(\frac{zw^{l}(z)}{w(z)})2}{w(z)+\frac{zw’(z)}{w(z)}}$

.

we

claim that

$|w(Z)|<1$

for

$z\in E$

.

Otherwise

there

exists a

point

$z_{0}\in E$

such

that

$|| \leq|\max_{zz\mathrm{o}|}|w(Z)|=|w(z\mathrm{o})|=1$

.

Letting

$w(_{\tilde{4}0})=e^{i\theta}$

and using lemma with

$a=1$

and

$k=1$

,

we

see

that

$\frac{D^{n}f(z_{0})}{D^{n-1}f(Z0)}=e^{i\theta}$

,

$\frac{D^{n+1}f(z0)}{D^{n}f(_{\sim}7)0}=m+e^{i\theta}$

,

$\frac{D^{n+2}f(Z_{0})}{D^{n+1}f(_{Z)}0}=\frac{m+L+3mei\theta+e2i\theta}{m+e^{i\theta}}$

,

where

$L= \frac{z_{0}^{2}w’\prime(z_{0})}{w(z_{0})}$

and

$m\geq 1$

.

Further, an

application

of (2.2) in lemma gives

${\rm Re} L\geq m(m-1)$

.

Since

$h(r, S, t)\in H$

,

we

have

$|h( \frac{D^{n}f(Z\mathrm{o})}{D^{n-1}f(_{Z)}0}\rangle^{\frac{D^{n+1}f(_{Z)}0}{D^{n}f(z_{0})}\frac{D^{n+^{l})}\sim f(z0)}{D^{n+1}f(Z0)}}’)|$

$=|h(e^{i\theta}, m+e^{i\theta}, \frac{m+L+3me+i\theta 2i\theta e}{m+e^{i\theta}})|$

$\geq 1$

.

which contradicts the condition

(2.4)

of the

theorem.

Therefore,

we

conclude that

$| \frac{D^{n}f(z)}{D^{n-1}f(z)}|<1$

$(z\in E)$

.

This

completes

the

proof

of Theorem.

(4)

REFERENCES

[1]

B. A. Uralegaddi

and Somanatha,

New

Crite

$r\dot{\tau}a$

for

meromorphic

starlike

uni-valent functions,

Bull. Austral. Math.

Soc.

43 (1991),

137-140.

[2| M. K. Aouf

and

H. M. Hossen, New

Crite

$\tau\dot{\tau}a$

for

meromorphic

$p$

-valent starlike

functions, Tsukuba

J.

Math.

17

(1993),

481-486.

[3] S. S.

Miller

and

P. T.

Mocanu,

Second

order

differential

inequalities in the

complex

plane,

J. Math. Anal. Appl. 65 (1978),

289-305.

[4]

S.

Ruscheweyh, New

$c_{7\dot{\eta}}ter\dot{\mathrm{B}}a$

for

univalent functions, Proc.

Amer.

MIath.

Soc.

49 (1975),

109-115.

Jinlin

Liu

: Department of

Mathematics,

Water Conservancy College, Yangzhou

University, Yanzhou 225009, People’s Republic of

China.

$-$

Shigeyoshi Owa :

Department of

Mathematics,

Kinki University,

Higashi-Osaka,

Osaka 577, Japan.

参照

関連したドキュメント

In our case, nevertheless, we were able to prove (Proposition 3.4) that in the class C, Hausdorff convergence implies compact convergence which is the main tool for proving the

Its Tamari polynomial B T (x) counts the trees smaller than or equal to T in the Tamari order according to the number of nodes on their

After this Introduction, in Section 2 we introduce some necessary notation, recall some basic facts about convex and concave functions and state, prove and discuss our main result

The following result about dim X r−1 when p | r is stated without proof, as it follows from the more general Lemma 4.3 in Section 4..

Condition (1.2) and especially the monotonicity property of K suggest that both the above steady-state problems are equivalent with respect to the existence and to the multiplicity

In order to solve this problem we in- troduce generalized uniformly continuous solution operators and use them to obtain the unique solution on a certain Colombeau space1. In

While conducting an experiment regarding fetal move- ments as a result of Pulsed Wave Doppler (PWD) ultrasound, [8] we encountered the severe artifacts in the acquired image2.

Topological conditions for the existence of a multisymplectic 3- form of type ω (or equivalently of a tangent structure) on a 6-dimensional vector bundle will be the subject of