• 検索結果がありません。

2 Our work Main result Example

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "2 Our work Main result Example"

Copied!
52
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Introduction Our work

Counting smaller trees in the Tamari order

Gr´ egory Chatel, Viviane Pons

March 25, 2013

(2)

Introduction Our work

1 Introduction Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

2 Our work Main result Example

Sketch of our proof

(3)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

Permutations and the weak order

Permutations

A permutation σ is a word of size n where every letter of {1, . . . , n} appear only once.

Ex : 1234, 15234, 4231.

Weak order: partial order on permutations

At each step, we exchange two increasing consecutives values.

123 213 132

231

312

(4)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

Binary trees

Binary trees

• •

• •

• •

Canonical labelling

x

5 1

3

1 7

(5)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

From permutations to binary trees

The binary search tree insertion

15324 →

4

2

1 3

5

(6)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

From permutations to binary trees

The binary search tree insertion

15324 →

4 2

1 3

5

(7)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

From permutations to binary trees

The binary search tree insertion

15324 →

4 2

1

3

5

(8)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

From permutations to binary trees

The binary search tree insertion

15324 →

4 2

1

3

5

(9)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

From permutations to binary trees

The binary search tree insertion

15324 →

4 2

1 3

5

(10)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

Order relation

Right rotation

x y

A B

C →

x A y

B C

This gives an order relation on binary trees.

Example

4 4

4

(11)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

The Tamari lattice

Figure: The Tamari lattices of size 3 and 4.

(12)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

The Tamari lattice as a quotient of the weak order

123 213 132

231 312

1 2

3

1 2

3 1

2 3

1

2 3

1 2

2 4

5

13254

31254 13524

31524 15324

35124 51324

(13)

Introduction Our work

Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

Our objective

Goal

We want a formula that computes, for any given tree T the number of trees smaller than T in the Tamari order.

Example : how many trees are smaller than or equal to this one ?

1 2 3

4

5

6

(14)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

1 Introduction Basic definitions Tamari lattice Goal

2 Our work Main result Example

Sketch of our proof

(15)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Tamari polynomials

Tamari polynomials

Given a binary tree T , we define:

B := 1 (1)

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1)

x − 1 (2)

with T =

L

R

(16)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Main theorem

Theorem

Let T be a binary tree. Its Tamari polynomial B T (x) counts

the trees smaller than or equal to T in the Tamari order

according to the number of nodes on their left border. In

particular, B T (1) is the number of trees smaller than T .

(17)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5

6

(18)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5 6

• B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = xB 3 (x ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 3 (x ) = x B 1 (x )

• B 1 (x ) = x xB

2

(x)−B x−1

2

(1)

• B 2 (x ) = x

• B 1 (x ) = x (1 + x ) = x + x 2

• B 3 (x ) = x (x + x 2 ) = x 2 + x 3

(19)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5 6

• B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = xB 3 (x ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 3 (x ) = x B 1 (x )

• B 1 (x ) = x xB

2

(x)−B x−1

2

(1)

• B 2 (x ) = x

• B 1 (x ) = x (1 + x ) = x + x 2

• B 3 (x ) = x (x + x 2 ) = x 2 + x 3

(20)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5 6

• B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = xB 3 (x ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 3 (x ) = x B 1 (x )

• B 1 (x ) = x xB

2

(x)−B x−1

2

(1)

• B 2 (x ) = x

• B 1 (x ) = x (1 + x ) = x + x 2

• B 3 (x ) = x (x + x 2 ) = x 2 + x 3

(21)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5 6

• B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = xB 3 (x ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 3 (x ) = x B 1 (x )

• B 1 (x ) = x xB

2

(x)−B x−1

2

(1)

• B 2 (x ) = x

• B 1 (x ) = x (1 + x ) = x + x 2

• B 3 (x ) = x (x + x 2 ) = x 2 + x 3

(22)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5 6

• B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = xB 3 (x ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 3 (x ) = x B 1 (x )

• B 1 (x ) = x xB

2

(x)−B x−1

2

(1)

• B 2 (x ) = x

• B 1 (x ) = x (1 + x ) = x + x 2

• B 3 (x ) = x (x + x 2 ) = x 2 + x 3

(23)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5 6

• B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = xB 3 (x ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 3 (x ) = x B 1 (x )

• B 1 (x ) = x xB

2

(x)−B x−1

2

(1)

• B 2 (x ) = x

• B 1 (x ) = x (1 + x ) = x + x 2

• B 3 (x ) = x (x + x 2 ) = x 2 + x 3

(24)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5

6 • B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = x(x 2 + x 3 ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 6 (x ) = x B 5 (x )

• B 5 (x ) = x

• B 6 (x ) = x · x = x 2

(25)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5

6 • B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = x(x 2 + x 3 ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 6 (x ) = x B 5 (x )

• B 5 (x ) = x

• B 6 (x ) = x · x = x 2

(26)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5

6 • B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = x(x 2 + x 3 ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 6 (x ) = x B 5 (x )

• B 5 (x ) = x

• B 6 (x ) = x · x = x 2

(27)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5

6 • B T (x ) = B 4 (x) = x(x 2 + x 3 ) xB

6

(x)−B x−1

6

(1)

• B 6 (x ) = x B 5 (x )

• B 5 (x ) = x

• B 6 (x ) = x · x = x 2

(28)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5 6

• B 4 (x ) = x (x 2 + x 3 )(1 + x + x 2 )

• B 4 (x ) = x 6 + 2x 5 + 2x 4 + x 3

(29)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

B ∅ := 1

B T (x ) := x B L (x ) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

1 2 3

4

5 6

• B 4 (x ) = x (x 2 + x 3 )(1 + x + x 2 )

• B 4 (x ) = x 6 + 2x 5 + 2x 4 + x 3

(30)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Example

1 2 3

4

5 6

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

••

(31)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Sketch of our proof

Increasing and decreasing forests

4

2 5

1 3 9

7

6 8

(32)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Sketch of our proof

Increasing and decreasing forests

4

2 5

1 3 9

7

6 8

(33)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Sketch of our proof

Increasing and decreasing forests

4

2 5

1 3 9

7

6 8

1 2

3

4 5

6 7 9

8

(34)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Sketch of our proof

Increasing and decreasing forests

4

2 5

1 3 9

7

6 8

4

2 3

1

5 9

7 8

6

(35)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Initial and final intervals as linear extensions

1 2

3

1 2

3 1

2 3

1

2 3

1 2

3

1

2 3

123 213 132

231 312

321

(36)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Initial and final intervals as linear extensions

1 2

3

1 2

3 1

2 3

1

2 3

1 2

3

1 2 3

123 213 132

231 312

321

(37)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Initial and final intervals as linear extensions

1 2

3

1 2

3 1

2 3

1

2 3

1 2

3

1

2 3

123 213 132

231 312

321

(38)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Linear extensions of any interval

• •

(39)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Linear extensions of any interval

1

2 3

4

(40)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Linear extensions of any interval

1 2

3

4

(41)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Linear extensions of any interval

1

2 3

4

(42)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Sketch of proof

Back to the functional equation

B T (x ) = xB L (x) x B R (x ) − B R (1) x − 1

Since it is defined on binary trees, see it as bilinear map.

B(f , g ) = xf (x ) xg(x ) − g(1)

x − 1

(43)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Sketch of proof

Combinatorial interpretation of B

Lift the bilinear map to take intervals as arguments.

X

T

0

≤T

[T 0 , T ] = B ( X

L

0

≤L

[L 0 , L], X

R

0

≤R

[R 0 , R ])

with T =

L

R

(44)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Definition of B on an example

B (

1 2

3

, 2

1 3

) =

1 2

3

4

1 2

3

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

(45)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Definition of B on an example

B (

1 2

3

, 2

1 3

) =

1 2

3 4

5 6

7

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

(46)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Definition of B on an example

B (

1 2

3

, 2

1 3

) =

1 2

3 4

5 6

7

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

(47)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Definition of B on an example

B (

1 2

3

, 2

1 3

) =

1 2

3 4

5 6

7

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

(48)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

Definition of B on an example

B (

1 2

3

, 2

1 3

) =

1 2

3 4

5 6

7

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

+ 1 2

3 4

5 6

7

(49)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

1 2 3

4 5

6

B ( 3

1 2 +

3 1

2

, 2

1 )

[

3 2 1

, 3

2

1 ] [

3

2

1 ,

3

2

1 ] [ 2

1

, 2

1 ]

(50)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

B ( 3

1 2 +

3 1

2

, 2

1 ) = 4

3 1 2

6 5

+

4 3 1 2

6 5

+

4 3 1 2

6 5

4 3 6

4 3 6

4

3 6

(51)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

4 3 1 2

6 5

+

4 3 1 2

6 5

+

4 3 1 2

6 5

+ 4 3 1 2

6

5 +

4 3 1 2

6

5 +

4 3 1 2

6

5

(52)

Introduction Our work

Main result Example Sketch of our proof

[

• •

• •

,

• ]

x 6

+

+ [

• •

,

• ]

x 5

+

+

[

• •

,

• ]

x 4

+ [

• •

• •

,

• •

• ] + [

,

• •

• ] + [

• •

• ,

• •

• ]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Rhoudaf; Existence results for Strongly nonlinear degenerated parabolic equations via strong convergence of truncations with L 1 data..

[37] , Multiple solutions of nonlinear equations via Nielsen fixed-point theory: a survey, Non- linear Analysis in Geometry and Topology (T. G ´orniewicz, Topological Fixed Point

More m-Tamari Like Lattices The Dihedral Groups Other Coxeter Groups... The m-Cover Poset The m-Tamari Lattices More m-Tamari

Thus, Fujita’s result says that there are no global, nontrivial solutions of (1.3) whenever the blow up rate for y(t) is not smaller than the decay rate for w(x, t) while there are

This paper presents an investigation into the mechanics of this specific problem and develops an analytical approach that accounts for the effects of geometrical and material data on

We study the classical invariant theory of the B´ ezoutiant R(A, B) of a pair of binary forms A, B.. We also describe a ‘generic reduc- tion formula’ which recovers B from R(A, B)

While conducting an experiment regarding fetal move- ments as a result of Pulsed Wave Doppler (PWD) ultrasound, [8] we encountered the severe artifacts in the acquired image2.

In section 4 we use this coupling to show the uniqueness of the stationary interface, and then finish the proof of theorem 1.. Stochastic compactness for the width of the interface