トップページ - 横浜国立大学学術情報リポジトリ
全文
(2) 2 M. MAEDA. simple vector of unit length which represents T.(S). Then, from [2: Theorem 1, pp. 435],. ' ' d2 <1) dt2 V(t)lt-o=S,{-<u4X(g), g>2+<u4x,.4x(g), g> '. -+IIuiZi(6)II2+<7x,."X,<'>}dvs. where u4i and Vx,oX are defined as follows. Let 7 be the Riemannian connection of M and (-jZX:T.(M)-.T.(M) be defined as u4i( Y):--7yX for YE T.(M).. ?. This map can be extended uniquely as a derivation on APT.(M). Namely, for a P-vector YiA ・-・AY,EAPT.(M), u4X(YiA ・・・ AYp):= ]ll] YiA ・・・ AYi-i. i=1 Au4X(Yi)A Yi+iA ・・・ A Y,. Let 7x,oX:T.<M)-T.(M) be alinear map defined as. 7x,yX:=7xVyNXmV7.gX for YET.(M). where 9 is an extension of Y as a local field. And this definition does not dde erPievna2ioOnn. oannYApeE2j iSj'.On Of Y' And aiso 7x7oX is extended uniqueiy as a. ' Now, foramoment, weassumethat Mis diffeomorphic to an n-dimensional Euclidean space E" and g:M-->En is the diffeomorphism. Let {zL`} be the canonical orthonormal coordinate in Enand xi:=u`og a coordinate in M.. Assume that M has the Riemannian metric expressed as gij(x)dxidxj= e2f(X)5ijdxidxj for some smooth function f, where Sij i's the Kronecker's delta・. We use the Einstein's convention. Putting f,:=O.f70xZ, we have. gij=e"2fSij, <2). { ].Zle }==LSk +f,S}-f,5,h. ' Put fij:=OiL・-fifj where g,,gjk=6,le and {7・Zle} is the Christoffel's symbol. + ± fkfk6ij. Then the curvature tensor is expressed as. '. (3) R,,,i=-O Si?.}6{,/k・}+{,6,}{z・z}-{ji.}{:・z}. '. Then, from (2) and (3), we have. --. (4) R,,,e==f,,6S・-h,SS・+5,,fS・-6,,ft・. In particular, when i7SL we have. s. (5) Rijij=Rijileglej=e2fRijile6kj=e2f(fii+fjD. Now assume that M has the positive scalar curvature. Then, from (5). O< - ]X 2 2-4fR,j,j i=1 J'#t. n・. == - 2(n - 1)e-2f ]2)n fii. i=1. '.
(3) The lnjectivity Radius of Certain Manifolds '3 ' ' '. =-2(n-1)e-2f{t?.,O,f,+(g-1)t?.,f3・}・. So, we have '. <6) £.,O,fi<-(g-i)t/i.i).,f3・・ '' ' O For vector fields X.,:== ox., a==1,2,・・・,n on M, let {gg}tER be the 1-. parameter groups of diffeomorphisms of M which generate X.. V.(t) denotes the volume of g9(S). And we formally calculate.E.l}, ddt22 V.(t)lt=, by using (1).. Hereafterweusetheindexnotationsuchthat . ISh,l,m,a$n, ISi,j-s{P, IS.k-<.q,P+q=n. For each point xEMI {Xi(x),・・・,i¥.(x)} is an orthogonal basis of T.(M) with same norm ef. So let {ei,・・・,ep,ni,・・・,nq},P+q=n be an orthonormal basis of T.(M) such that eiA ・・・ Ae. =6.. Then {eb ・・・,ep, ni, ・・・, n,} is obtained. from {Xi(x), ・・・,X.(x)} by some orthogonal transformation {aM} and the function e-f. That is. et= e-fal X.(x), nle=e-faifX.(x).. ' Since I[u4Xdi(6.)ii2=<cyjZict(8.),e.>2+Z<(YZXdi(ej),nle>2, the integrand of ' j''ic. d2. liii dt2 Vcr(t)[t-o. '. == :iP{-<u4Xat(e.), 6.>2+<u4Xdi,-.jZitu(e.), e.> +H,-jZidi(6.)H2+ <7..,e.X., g.>} = lll] <aidiu4iat(6.), 6.> +.l;,1,,<u4Xat(e,), nk>2+ ]{) <7x.,#.X. 8.> =2 £ <u4Xat(e,), e,><UZXct(e,・), ej> + 2,<u4iou.jZiat(ei), e,>. ai;j'- a,z. ' +.lllLl,,<uiZiat(ej').,nfe>2+.Z,,,<Vx.・,eJ'Xooej'>'. =:I+ ll +M+IV. We will calculate these four terms respectively. Since. '. <u4ict(ei), ei>= ;l.l] al・aY・ { IM. }= IIIi) ai・a: (ft6ge +flt6Y-f.5la) = >i) aS・ag・f},==.fL,,. ' ' ' I=:il),1;j<u4Xct(ei),ei><u4Xat(ei),ej>=p(p-1)?fz. .. NeXt, we calculate the second term. The following can easily be verified. <u4iat..fziat(et), ei> =;aS・ath・ { IM. }'{ .4cr }. =,;l,),a!-a:・L(feop+f.5ge-f.6t.)(f.S2+f.Sin-A6..). ==2alaSfefh-aga?ftA+fZ-a2a,ct・¥fZ..
(4) 4 M. MAEDA So we have. ll = 2)<u4Xct.iZXat(e,), ei>=Z(2-'n)ag・alfi.fl,,. a,i i. =£(2-n)(aS・f,)2.. i. Using 2a}aZ =・5jle==O, we have. L. <u4iat(e,), nle>2 = :;;p(aSaw{ l"crZ })2 .. ==]E)(aS・aW(ft6gy+fh,Sz't-.71.5i.))2. m =(aS・a2 ft - aS aYL,,)2 .. u.. Hence z <u4Xct・(e,),,n,>2= Z {(aSia2fi)2+(a,at・ aYL.)2-2aS-a,at・ aZ djfiL.}. a,ik. a,Jl le == Z {(aS・aff,)2+(agy・ ayL.)2} a,1',le == £ (a2)2(aS・f,)2+ 2 (a?・ )2(a7fl.)2. cr,J',k. a,j',le. =li](7Z-P)(aSft)2+l:I]p(a7,nfin)2.. Since {aM is an orthogonal matrix, :i)(aZhft)2==Z.(ai.ft)2-:i,](aS・fe)2=T-:X]fZ-l;,)(aS・fi)2・. so. M =(n-P)Z(aSf,)2+P£(aYf,,)2 =(n-2P)Z(a}f,)2+PZfZ. By definition the fourth term becomes. J'k j'a. N == 2.<Vi.,,ejXcr, ej>. a,j. ==.i,.a;a?L -oa.. { ln. } = Z a;・aY(O.,f},Si'n+5.,fiSW-O..1`}.St.). a,J',m. -peo.fh<-p(-,"--i)pfz.. ,. Here we have used the assumption (6). From the above calculation, 1I] ddt, V.(t)I,=,-S,(I + ll +m+Iv)dv,. <S,{P(P-1)7fZ+(2-n)¥(a!f,)2 +(n-2p)¥(a!・ft)2+P¥fZ-P( Z -1)?fZ}dvs =S.{P(P+i-ll-)?fZ+2(i-p)¥(a:・f,)2}dv,.. ・!,.
(5) The. Injectivity Radius of Certain Manifolds. 5. Proof of the Theorem. We assume that there exists 'a point yGM such that i(y)< .v:- and derive. a contradiction. Let yNEMbe apointsuehthat i(yN)==Min{i(x):xGM}. Then, by [1; Lemma 2, pp. 226], there exists a normal closed geodesic c:[O, 2i(yN)].M such that c(O)=c(2i(yN))=yN. Since c([O, 2i(Y)]) is a 1-dimensional compact sub,. manifold of M] we can apply the above argument. Choose a point zGM -c([O, 2i(yN)]) and let U.(z)cM-c([O, 2i(Y)]) be an open convex ball with radius. r>O centerd at z. Using a stereographic projection and the diffeomorphic map c. from M to Sn, we obtain a diffeomorphic map g:M-{2}->En which is conformaL Let ut be an orthogonal coordinate of E" and xt:=uZog be a coordinate in M. For a positive number r',O<ri<r, let ¢ be a smooth function. ' on M such that O$¢S.1 and ・,={ g・・ g.n bK-,,Y,z`g'. And consider the vector fields Xcr, .=i,2,.,,,. on M given by. xa,=l¢o2a on M-{z}. tO atz. Let {g2}tER be the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms on M which generate Xa. Then from the construction of ¢, our previous calculation can be applicable. to this case. And hence we have, putting P==1, :i; S,2, v.(t)s,=,<S,{(2-ll-)]Ipfz}ds:so. where ds is the volume element of c. Thus we can find a vector field X" on M, not vanishing on c, such that. dt2d2V.(t)I,=,<o. Then, by the same argument used by W. Klingenberg to get the estimation of the injectivity radius for a compact orientable even-dimensional manifold with. the sectional curvature O<K.$2, we can easily get a contradiction, see [1;. Satz, pp. 227]. q. e. d. References. [1] D. GRoMoLL, W. KLiNGENBERG and W. MEyER, Riemannsche Geometrie im [2]. Grossen, Lecture Note, (1968) Springer-Verlag. H.B. LAwsoN and J. SiMoNs, On stable currents and their application to global problems in real and complex geometry, Ann. of Math. 98 (1973), 427-450.. [3] M. TANi, An example of an odd dimensional positively pinched Riemannian manifold, T6hoku Math. Journ. 21 (1969), 532-538..
(6)
関連したドキュメント
Theorem 7.1 (Gromov–Lawson [9], Schoen–Yau [27]) Let M be a closed manifold, not necessarily connected, with a Riemannian metric of positive scalar curvature, and let M 0 is
For G /k connected, simple, algebraically simply connected and of real rank m, does the weak Emerton criterion always hold in dimension
Let X be an admissible Riemannian complex and G be a finitely generated group with with polynomial volume growth such that X/G = Y is a finite polytopal complex satisfying
Proof.. One can choose Z such that is has contractible connected components. This simply follows from the general fact that under the assumption that the functor i : Gr // T is
Let Y 0 be a compact connected oriented smooth 3-manifold with boundary and let ξ be a Morse-Smale vector field on Y 0 that points in on the boundary and has only rest points of
Algebraic curvature tensor satisfying the condition of type (1.2) If ∇J ̸= 0, the anti-K¨ ahler condition (1.2) does not hold.. Yet, for any almost anti-Hermitian manifold there
We prove that any simply connected and complete Riemannian manifold, on which a Randers metric of positive constant flag curvature exists, must be diffeomorphic to an
It is known that quasi-continuity implies somewhat continuity but there exist somewhat continuous functions which are not quasi-continuous [4].. Thus from Theorem 1 it follows that