• 検索結果がありません。

JAIST Repository: 理工系大学院プログラムの日米比較

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "JAIST Repository: 理工系大学院プログラムの日米比較"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

JAIST Repository

https://dspace.jaist.ac.jp/

Title

理工系大学院プログラムの日米比較

Author(s)

Sienko, Tanya

Citation

年次学術大会講演要旨集, 10: 240-245

Issue Date

1995-10-05

Type

Conference Paper

Text version

publisher

URL

http://hdl.handle.net/10119/5513

Rights

本著作物は研究・技術計画学会の許可のもとに掲載す

るものです。This material is posted here with

permission of the Japan Society for Science

Policy and Research Management.

(2)

3B8

理工系大学院プロバラムの

日米比較

0TanyaSienko

卸学 技術政策研究所

Introduction.

Japan@ has expressed anxi ty for many years about the pauCty of doctorates

in@ science@ and@ engineering@ it@ has@ been@ producing@ with@ respect@ to@ the@ United States ・ This@ paper@ summarizes@ actual@ differences@ in@ the@ structures@ of

graduate@ programs@ between@ the@ countries , Varous@ graduate@ programs@ in

science@ and@ engineering@ of@ 14@ U , S ・ universities@ were@ compared@ with@ those@ of

10@ Japanese@ universities ・ In@ addition , results@ from@ surveys@ and@ in-depth

interviews@ carried@ out@ by@ the@ author@ were@ also@ incorporated The man

differences@ were@ as@ follows

m i@ i@ n ・

The@ Japanese@ graduate@ system@ @@ much@ more@ centrali ed@ than@ the

American@ one ・ The@ form@ of@ what@ comprises@ a@ graduate@ program@ varies

extremely@ little@ from@ university@ to@ university@ in@ Japan , Funding@ is@ also

extremely@ centralized@ and@ constricted , which@ presents@ difficulties@ for

professors@ in@ assuring@ funding@ for@ potential@ graduate@ students

Whereas@ most@ of@ the@ top@ graduate@ schoo Ⅰ @@ Japan@ are@ connected@ to@ the

ex-Imperial@ colleges , the@ top@ graduate@ schools@ in@ the@ U ・ S , are a mixture of

public@ and@ private@ universities ・ The@ public@ universities@ are@ often@ more

in Ⅰ exible@ in@ their@ admission@ requirements,@ but@ that@ is@ about@ the@ only

difference , with the public universities emulating the private universities as

far@ as@ possible , In@ Japan , up@ to@ now@ it@ has@ been@ the@ reverse

Difference in Program Structure:

Japanese@ M ・ S , programs@ require@ 30@ units@ of@ classes , a@ thesis , and@ take@ two

years , Japanese@ Ph , D ・ programs@ start@ beyond@ the@ M ・ S ・ , are@ m8nly@ research ,

require another thesis , and take three years ・

By@ comparison , U , S ・ graduate@ programs@ are@ extremely@ varied , Master , s

programs@ usually@ take@ 1-2@ years , may@ or@ may@ not@ require@ a@ thesis , a@ "final

project" , or an internship at some corpora Ⅰ on ・ Double master's programs

are@ also@ not@ uncommon , It@ is@ standard@ for@ M ・ S ・ programs@ to@ req ℡ re@ one@ major

specia Ⅰ za Ⅰ on,@ one@ or@ more@ minor@ speC8izatons,@ laboratory@ courses,@ and

"other courses" , some of which may be required to be from a different

depanment. (See Figs. I,1, 1.2, 2.1,2.2. 3.1, 3.2) Ph.D. pr0grams can take

anywhere@ from@ 4@ to@ 10@ years,@ require@ some@ sort@ of@ qualiEcation@ exam,@ a

pr0iminary@ exam , a@ theSs , and@ a@ theSs@ defense ・ The@ Ph ・ D , program@ may@ or

may not include the actual getting of an M , S ・ degree , but in addition to the

above@ course@ requi ements,@ more@ courses@ in@ one's@ specia Ⅰ ty@ and@ more

research@ is@ required , as@ well@ as@ often@ at@ least@ one@ year@ of@ teaching

Japanese graduate programs depend heavily on seminars and lectures ,

wih@ the@ rest@ of@ the@ time@ i e4 Ⅰ b0ng@ taken@ up@ by@ research ・ Lit Ⅰ

homework@ @@ requied , Ⅲ 0st@ of@ it@ @@ the@ form@ of@ reports ・ By@ contrast , US

graduate programs depend heavily on highly-structured courses , Wth

problem@ sets@ req Ⅱ ring@ Szeab Ⅰ amounts@ of@ Ⅰ me,@ mid-term@ and@ Ⅰ n8@ exams

Whereas@ the@ difficulties@ in@ advancement@ through@ a@ Japanese@ graduate

(3)

time , U ・ S ・ graduate schools are quite competitive , with a series of exams the

graduate@ student@ must@ pass@ before@ being@ admitted@ to@ candidacy , These@ exams

are@ not@ trivial;@ one-third@ to@ one-half@ of@ the@ students@ to@ not@ pass

Certain@ courses@ are@ found@ in@ Japanese@ graduate@ departments@ which@ are

not@ found@ in@ US@ graduate@ departments:@ courses@ dealing@ with@ secondary

equipment@ and@ data ・ In@ the@ US , it@ is@ taken@ for@ granted@ that@ the@ student@ will

learn@ this@ on@ his@ own@ if@ necessary ・ Other@ courses@ that@ are@ more@ often@ found

in Japanese graduate departments than in US ones are application courses

tailored@ to@ the@ student ・ s@ speciality@ (Matrix@ Algebra@ for@ Engineers , for

example ・ )@ The@ US@ is@ more@ likely@ to@ offer@ these@ as@ joint@ courses@ or@ simply@ tell

the student to take a particular course in another department

Financial Aid:

Most@ US@ graduate@ students@ in@ science@ and@ engineering@ are@ funded through@ a@ combination@ of@ Teaching@ Assistantships , Research@ Assistantships ,

and@ outright@ fellowships , The@ forms@ of@ individual@ graduate@ funding@ differ

according@ to@ school@ and@ department , Investigating@ 177@ U ・ S , universities ,

most@ departments@ of@ 109@ of@ them@ waived@ tuition@ in@ all@ cases@ when@ providing

funding , 39@ of@ them@ required@ tuition@ to@ be@ paid@ in@ all@ cases , and@ the@ rest@ were

mixed . The@ levels@ of@ actual@ financial@ payment@ ranged@ from@ a@ miniscule

$2000@ per@ term@ to@ $15,000/@ term@ in@ the@ case@ of@ some@ of@ the@ fellowships Japan@ falls@ way@ behind@ the@ U , S ・ in@ terms@ of@ financial@ aid , Graduate

students@ are@ still@ considered , for@ the@ most@ part , to@ be@ responsible@ for@ their

own@ financial@ support , A@ certain@ amount@ of@ money@ is@ provided@ by@ companies

to@ individual@ researchers , but@ the@ employment@ obligations@ thus@ incurred@ are

found@ to@ be@ onerous@ by@ many ・ Two@ major@ sources@ of@ official@ funding@ exist@ for

graduate@ students@ in@ Japan:@ Fellowships@ from@ the@ Japanese@ Society@ for@ the Promotion@ of@ Science@ and@ so-called@ "scholarships"@ from@ the@ Japanese Scholarship Foundation , The latter would more appropriately be called

interest-free@ student@ loans@ which@ must@ be@ repaid@ unless@ the@ student

continues@ on@ to@ employment@ in@ academia , In@ 1994@ 26.2%@ and@ 59.0%@ of@ the

total@ M . S .. and@ Ph . D ・ students@ were@ covered@ by@ these@ scholarships , with@ the

amount@

provided@ being@ roughly@ half@ (assuming@ purchasing@

power@

parity)@

of

what@ US@ graduate@ students@ receive@ as@ T , A , s@ and@ R ・ A ・ s , This@ value@ is@ reduced@ yet

again@ since@ Japanese@ universities@ do@ not@ grant@ tuition@ waivers , At@ present ,

taking@ the@ entrance@ exam@ has@ a@ fee@ of@ around@ 30,000@ yen , the@ entrance@ fee@ is

around@ 300,000@ yen , and@ tuition@ per@ year@ is@ around@ 450,000@ yen ・ A

comparison@ of@ the@ average@ effective@ stipends@ of@ graduate@ students@ in@ the@ US

and@ Japan,@ corrected@ for@ the@ presence@ of@ tuiion@ waivers,@ etc , ,@ is@ given@ in

Figure 4 (using 1992 data)

Deoartments@ and@ Interdi C o Ⅰ narv@ Programs

Japanese@ graduate@ departments@ are@ narrow@ in@ the@ range@ of@ courses

covered@ by@ comparison@ to@ U ・ S , graduate@ departments,@ and@ almost@ totally@ lack

interdisciplinary@ courses ・ U , S , research@ university@ departments@ can@ have@ up

to@ a@ third@ of@ their@ courses@ as@ joint@ courses@ with@ other@ departments , U , S , mid-

level@ universities@ do@ not@ have@ interdisciplinary@ courses , basically@ because@ of

their emphasis on practice as opposed to theory

Differences in Recep Ⅰ on after Gradua Ⅰ on

Whereas in the United States M ・ S ・ and Ph ・ D ・ recipients have a definite

value@ in@ the@ employment@ market@ of@ industry@ above@ and@ beyond@ that@ of

someone@ who@ has@ stopped@ at@ a@ bachelor ・ s , in@ Japan@ the@ main@ area@ of

(4)

@@ of@ an@ over-speci li ed@ i tC Ⅰ ctu@@ who@ cannot@ adapt@ to@ a@ company

environment ・ [4]@ In@ the@ U , S ・・ , M ・ S ・ and@ Ph ・ D ・ recipients@ hold@ poStions@ higher

in@ salary@ and@ responsibility@ than@ people@ of@ similar@ age@ with@ only@ B ・ S , degrees

In@ the@ case@ of@ doctorates , this@ is@ particularly@ so , In@ Japan , little@ or@ no

distinction@ is@ made@ between@ the@ job@ responsibilities@ of@ a@ BS@ graduate@ and

someone@ Wth@ a@ higher@ degree , Figure@ 5@ shows@ yearly@ salaries@ for@ B ・ S ,, M ・ S ・ ,

and@ Ph ・ D ・ recipients@ in@ the@ U , S ・ and@ Japan@ presently@ employed@ in@ non ・

executive@ positions@ in@ industry , according@ to@ year@ of@ B , S , graduation , Figure

&&@ shows@ yearly@ salaries@ for@ B , S ・ , M , S ・ , and@ Ph , D ・ recipients@ in@ the@ U ・ S ・ and

Japan@ presently@ employed@ in@ governmental@ positions , according@ to@ year@ of

B ・ S ・ graduation@ [5] ・ Comparing@ salaries , it@ is@ in@ fact@ financially

disadvantageous@ in@ Japan@ to@ continue@ for@ a@ higher@ degree , while@ in@ the@ U ・ S ・ it

is@ advantageous , especially@ for@ a@ Ph , D , in@ industry

Conclusions 、

In@ regards@ to@ possible@ actions@ Japan@ can@ take@ to@ increase the

number

of graduate@ degree@ reCpi nts,@ the@ SmPest@ and@ most@ ob Ⅴ ous@ @@ to@ i crease@ the

Tnancial@ support@ of@ graduate@ students@ and@ to@ improve@ the@ level@ of@ facilities

and@ equipment@ in@ Japanese@ graduate@ departments ・ This@ simply@ requires

money

However , it@ is@ questionable@ as@ to@ how@ effective@ this@ will@ be@ until@ Japan has@ some@ form@ of@ market@ demand@ for@ people@ Wth@ hi her@ degrees ・ It@ is@ a

circular@ problem:@ Japanese@ companies@ will@ not@ place@ a@ premium@ on@ the

possession@ of@ a@ higher@ degree@ unless@ the@ people@ holding@ such@ are

demonstratively@ superior@ in@ research@ capabilities , However , until@ the

possession@ of@ a@ higher@ degree@ becomes@ obviously@ highly@ valued , people@ with

skills@ and@ ambition@ might@ as@ well@ work@ their@ way@ up@ through@ the@ company

Ⅰ dder , rather@ than@ go@ to@ graduate@ schoo ・

Th@@ paper@ @@ a@ very@ condensed@ verSon@ of@ a@ report@ the@ author@ has@ written@ for

NISTEP

Bibliography:

Ⅱ ]@ Ame Ⅱ can@ Soci ty@ for@ Engi eering@ Educa Ⅰ on , Di ectory@ of@ Graduate

Studies@ and@ Research-1992@ ASEE , Washington

[2]@ Pamphlets@ from@ MESC@ on@ the@ Japanese@ Scholarship@ Foundation@ and@ the

Japanese@ Society@ for@ the@ Promo Ⅰ on@ of@ Science

[3]@ IUd . ASEE , IUd , MESC

[4]@ "Increasing@ the@ Number@ of@ Course@ Ph ・ D ・ s@ in@ Science@ and@ Engineering

Taught-Course@ Doctorates@ @@ Japan" , C ・ NsHgata@ and@ Y ・Ⅱ rano , NISTEP@ report

#24

[5]@ "Survey@ on@ the@ Hand Ⅰ ng@ of@ Graduates@ in@ Sci nce , EngineeFng , and

Agricu Ⅰ ure" , Insttute@ for@ Future@ Technology , 1993 , and@ "S8a Ⅰ es@ of

Scientists , Engi eers , and@ Technicians-1993"@ Com Ⅲ ssi n@ on@ Professionals@ i

(5)

10%

1 0% 0% Ⅰ Thesis required 40% 鱗 Cou 斤 e +exam ワ Co Ⅰ 粟 +

projecl

"

"" 。 一 @

0%

U[aj , & min ,

2 ㏄る 目 巾 aj dept . Ⅰ maj.6min & Ⅰ w( シも OutsSide mln 口 other Fgures , 1.1 , 1.2

M ・ S ・ Program@ structure@ (general@ and@ in@ detail@ of@ courses)@ in@ U , S , Industrial@ Engineering

and@ Operati ns@ Research@ Departments@ (10@ cases)

フウる @Iゝhe$s req . D@Courses@only 0@ Course@ & 65% ワ Course & project 3%

緩弼

@I・ 口 m,j. &

■ maj.&min.& min D olher

24%

Figures 2.1.2.2

M ・ S ・ Program@ structure@ (general@ and@ in@ detail@ of@ courses)@ in@ U ・ S ・ Computer@ Science@ and

Electrical@ Engineering@ Departments@ (15@ cases)

33% 50%@ ["I@Courses@only & exam

17% 17%

33%

50% Figures 3.1 , 3.2

M . S ・ Program@ structure@ (general@ and@ in@ course@ detail)@ in@ U ・ S ・ Mechanical@ Engineering

(6)

35 Ⅰ Ⅰ 0 ,

■ U.S. 丁 A Ⅰ US R.A. 田 us Fe Ⅱ ow (CO Ⅰ て eCted Ⅰ Ⅰ Japan MS e は ・ S Japan Ph.D.eff し仁 リニ 3a こ p3 の ユ圧 。 し しⅠⅡ フ 一口 ゆヒり 三の 亡 u d せ Figure@ 4

Average@ Effective@ Stipends@ of@ Graduate@ Students@ in@ the@ U ・ S ・ and@ Japan@ (10,000@ yen/

month@ units) ワ ㏄ nS n け

eS Yea ( ln , S 什 Ⅰ U 睦 dd 抽 ㏄ BS 肝 ㎡ a Ⅰ r Ⅰ a ㎡ れ ny ob Comparis pints e Ⅰ dn ne S.O 00 SO B Ⅰ が ㎞ Ⅰ 800 1600

1400 BS Company Ⅰ p

1200 MS@ Company@ JP

1000

Ⅰ ヱジ

"

ニ,ヱ二二

=

甘二ヱン イ "" よ,ノ ,ノ

PhD@ Company@ JP 800 / づ ブ イィ ダ

BS@ Industry@ US 600

@@@@/ '"'"

MS @dus US 400 PhD@ l dustry@ US 200 0

F ㎏ ure 5

(7)

Comparison@ of@ Govt ・ Sector@Salaries@of@ BS , MS , and@ PhD@ Recipients@ in@ the

US@and@Japan@by@Year@of@BS@Graduati n@ (Yearl , 10,000@yen@unts)

一 Ⅰ

一イ

ノ , ・ " ー ノ " """ Ⅰ Ⅱ "." Ⅰ " ヲ - ⅠⅡ ヲ " ,メ 。 Ⅰ " ナ ヲ

" イ そア づ '

マア " ヨイ

甲ニ ⅠⅠ

ヱ -

"""'" ヲ ノヲ -

@ _

MS@ Govt@ US PhD@ Govt@ US

Ⅰ中しひ

Ⅰの

ヒい Ⅰ ー しい e Ⅰのしつ

-

のⅠ い 中しひ

い @ Figu ァ <e 6

参照

関連したドキュメント

東北大学大学院医学系研究科の運動学分野門間陽樹講師、早稲田大学の川上

ハンブルク大学の Harunaga Isaacson 教授も,ポスドク研究員としてオックスフォード

2014 年度に策定した「関西学院大学

経済学研究科は、経済学の高等教育機関として研究者を

本研究科は、本学の基本理念のもとに高度な言語コミュニケーション能力を備え、建学

本研究科は、本学の基本理念のもとに高度な言語コミュニケーション能力を備え、建学

本研究科は、本学の基本理念のもとに高度な言語コミュニケーション能力を備え、建学

社会学研究科は、社会学および社会心理学の先端的研究を推進するとともに、博士課