• 検索結果がありません。

OTHER TO

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "OTHER TO"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

VOL. 14 NO. 3

(1991)

451-456

FUNCTIONS STARLIKE WITH RESPECT TO OTHER POINTS

S. ABDUL HALIM DeDt.

of Mathematics University of Malaya

59100

Kuala

Lumpur

Malays i a

(Received September 26, 1990 and in revised form March 5,

1991)

ABSTRACT.

In [7],

Sakaguchi introduce the class of functions starlike with respect to symmetric points. We extend this class. For 0

.<

8 i, let

S*(8)

be the

s

class of normalised analytic functions f defined in the open unit disc D such that Re

zf’(z)/[f(z)-f(-z))

> 8, for some z e D. In this paper, we introduce 2 other similar classes

S*(8),

S

(8)

as well as give sharp results for the real

c sc

part of some function for f e

S(8) S(8)

and S

(8)

The behaviour of certain

s sc

integral operators are also considered.

KEY WORDS AND PHRASES. Starlike functions of order 8, functions starlike with respect

to

8ynnetrical points, close-to-convex, integral operators.

AMS Subject Classification (1985 Revision): Primary

30 C 45.

i. INTRODUCTION.

Let S be the class of analytic functions f, univalent in the unit disc

D lz Izl i},

with

f(z)

z + E a zn

(i.i)

n=2 n

For 0

.<

8 i, denote by

S*(8),

the class of starlike functions of order 8.

Then f e

S*(8)

if, and only if, for z e

D,

!zf’ %),]

Re

f(z)

> 8.

In

[7],

Sakaguchi introduced the class

S*

of analytic functions f, normalised s

by

(1.1)

which are starlike with respect to symmetrical points.

We

begin by defining the class S* which is contained in

K,

the class of close-to-convex functions.

s’

DEFINITION 1.

A function f e S if, and only if, for z e

D,

s

Re

f(Z)2f(iz)

> O.

We now extend this definition as follows:

(2)

DEFINITION 2.

A function f with normalisations

.]J

is said to be starlike of order 8, with respect to symmetric points if, and only if, for z e D and 0

.<

8 < l,

We denote this class by

S*(8)

and note that S*

S*(0).

s s s

In the same

manner,

we define the following new classes of close-to-convex functions, which are generalisations of the classes in E1-Ashwah and Thomas

[2].

DEFINITION 3.

A function f normalised by

(1.1)

is said to be starlike of order 8, with respect to conjugate points if, and only if, for z e D and 0 8 < l,

Re

2zf’(z) .

We denote this class by

S*(8).

c DEFINITION

4.

A function f normalised by

(1.1)

is said to be starlike of order 8, with respect to symmetric conjugate points if, and only if, for z e

D

and 0

.<

8 l,

Re

/. ?_’.i._ .

We denote this class by S*

(8).

sc RE,%.RK.

The class S* has been studied by several authors,

(eg.

Wu

[9]

and Stankiewicz

[8]).

s

For f c

S*( 8),

Owa et al

[4]

;)roved that for 8 <-

s

2’

Re

f(z) f(-z)

3-48’

z e D.

2. RESULTS.

THEOREM i.

Let

f e

S*(8),

then for z rei8 e.

D,

s

Re -[f(z)-f(-z)]

z

II(I-8) ">" 211(1-8)

2 >

e 8/(1-8)

l+r The result is sharp for

fo

given by

f0(z) fo(-Z) 2z(l+z2)

8-1

To

prove Theorem i., we first require the following lemma.

LEMMA

i.

Let

g e

S*(8)

andbe odd. Then for z reie

D,

Re z >"

2"

l+r

(3)

PROOF OF

LEMM

Pinchuk

[5]

showed that if ie

F e

S*(8),

then for z re

D, ll2(1-s)

z -i

.<r.

Since g is odd, we may write

[g(z)]2 F(z 2),

so that

(2.1)

gives

z -i

.<r

(2.1)

where on squaring both sides, gives

Thus

r z

h

Ig(z)i

2 Re + 1

.<

r

2Re + i

z

>" l-rh

r

l_r

h

>

+ 1

(i+r2)2

where we have used the inequality

[6]

ig(z)l >.

(l+r2)

I-8

for odd starlike functions of order 8.

The Lemma now follows at once.

PROOF OF THEORY4 i.

Since f e

S*(8),

it follows that we may write s

g(z) (z)-f(-z)

2

for g an odd starlike function of order

8. An

application of

Lemma

1 proves the Theorem.

Results analogous to Theorem i THEOREM 2.

Let f

S*(8).

Then for

C

can also be found for the classes z=reiS e

D,

s(6) a S*s(S).

Re f(z)+f()

l/2(1-6)

l+r

2(28-1)/2(1-8)

The result is sharp for

f(z)

+

f() 2z(l+z) 2(8-I)

PROOF

Since f e

S*(8),

it is easy to see that, if

C

F(z) f(z)+f()

then F a

S*(8).

from

(2.1)

that

Using the same techniques as in the proof of

Lemma

i, it follows

(4)

Re z

The result now follows immediately.

Similarly, we have the following result, which we state without proof.

THEOREM 3.

Let f S*

(8).

Then for z re

D,

sc

112(1-8)

2112tl_S

2

(28-1) 12(1-8)

Re

f(z)-f(-)

>.

>

z l+r

The resul is sharp for

f(z) f(-) 2z(l+z)

We now consider the results of some integral

operators. In [i]

Das and Singh, obtained analogous results of the Libera integral

operator.

They proved that for f e

S*(0),

the function h given by

s

t-l[

f(

t)-f(-t) ]dt h(zJ

70

also belongs to

S*(0).

s

The result below generalises that of Das and Singh.

THEOREM

4.

Let f e

S*(8).

Then the function

H

defined by s

H(z) a+__l

z

ta-l[f(t)_f(_t) ]dt,

2za

JO

(2.2)

also belongs to

S*(6) .for

z

D

and a + 6 O.

s

We first require the following Lemma due to Miller and Mocanu

[5].

LEMMA

2.

Let

M

and

N

be analytic in

D

with

M(O) N(O)

0 and let 6 be any real number. If

N(z)

maps

D onto

a

(possibly

many

sheeted)

region which is starlike with respect to the origin, then for z e

D,

’(z) M(z)

Re

N--(z

>

6

--->Re

N--

> 6,

and

PROOF OF THEOREM

h.

(2.2)

ives,

2zH’

(z) H(z)-H(-z)

Re

M’ z) M(z)

N’ z)

<

6

---->Re

N(--

<

6.

Iz ta-l[

za[ f(z)-f(-z) ]-a f(

t

)-f(-t ]dt

JO

z

ta-l[ f( t)-f(-t

dt 0

(z)

N-V’

say.

Note

that

M(O) N(O)

0 and for f

S*(6),

s

(5)

zN"(z)

[--z[ i (z)+f’ (-z) ]

i:

+

N’ ()

+

Thus

N(z)

is starlike if, and only if a > -8.

Furthermore, since

Re N’ (z) Re (z)-f(-) iI

>

"

Lemma

2 shows that

H

e

S*(8).

s

Finally, we give the following analogous results for the classes

S(8)

and S

(8).

c sc

THEOREM

5.

Let f

S*(8).

c Then

H

defined by

H(z) a+--!l [z ta_l[f(t + f(----]dt, (2.3)

2za

Jo

also belongs to

S*(8)

for z e

D

and a + > 0.

c PROOF.

Since f e

S*(8), (2.3)

gives c

Thus

ta-l[f(t)

+

f(:)]dt

2 ta-I

t + Y. Re dt

0 0

n=2

2z

H’(z) H(z)

+

H(:)

=2

ZRea

0

n=2

n

z

ta_l If(t)

+

f(:)]dt

0

fz ta_l

za[f(z)

+

f()]

a

[f(t)

+

f()]dt

0

z

ta_l[f(t + f(:)]dt

0

where

M(0) N(0)

0 and

N

e S

*

for a +

8

> 0.

On using

Lemma

2 it follows that

H

e

S*(8)

c

THEOREM 6.

Let f e S*

(8).

Then

H

defined by sc

H(z) a+--!l [z ta_l[f{t f(-:)]dt,

2za

0

also belongs to

S* (8)

for z

D

and a +

8

> 0.

sc

(6)

PROOF.

For f e S*

(8), (2.4)

gives SC

Hi-i)

a+l

f-z

t

(-z)

a 0

a-l[f(t) f(-)]dt

a + i

2(-z)

a+l

(-z) n+a

z)a

a + i

n=

2 n + a

(-n

+

(-l)n+lan)}

-(a+l)

za

z

0

ta_l[f(t f(-)]dt.

As before, writing

2zH’(z) H(z) H(-I)

M(z) N(z)’

one can show that N e S* and hence using Lemma 2 the result follows.

REFERENCES

i.

R.N.Das

and P.Singh, On subclasses of schlicht mapping, Indian J. Pure Appl.

Math.,

8, (1977), 864-872.

2. R.M.Ei-Ashwah and D.K.Thomas, Some subclasses of close-to-convex functions, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc.

.2.(i), (1987) 85-100.

3. S.S.Miller and

P.T.Mocanu,

Second order differential inequalities in the complex plane,

J...

Math.

Ana.. Appl.., 65, (1978), 289-304.

4. S.Owa, Z.Wu

and

F.Ren,

A note on certain subclass of Sakaguchi functions, Bull. de la

Royale.

de

Liege, 57(3), (1988), 143-150.

5.

B.Pinchuk, On starlike and convex functions of order 8, Duke Math. Journal,

35., (1968), 721-734.

6.

M.S.Robertson, On the theory of univalent functions, Ann.

Math., 3.7, (1936), 374-408.

7.

K.Sakaguchi, On a certain univalent mapping, J.

Math...Soc. Jpa.n,

ii,

(1959), 72-75.

8.

J.Stankiewicz, Some remarks on functions starlike w.r.t, symmetric points, Ann. Univ. Marie Curie

Sklodowska 19( 7), (1965), 53-59.

9. Z.Wu,

On classes of Sakaguchi functions and Hadamard products, Sci. Sinica Set.

A,

30,

(1987), 128-135.

(7)

Special Issue on

Modeling Experimental Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaotic Scenarios

Call for Papers

Thinking about nonlinearity in engineering areas, up to the 70s, was focused on intentionally built nonlinear parts in order to improve the operational characteristics of a device or system. Keying, saturation, hysteretic phenomena, and dead zones were added to existing devices increasing their behavior diversity and precision. In this context, an intrinsic nonlinearity was treated just as a linear approximation, around equilibrium points.

Inspired on the rediscovering of the richness of nonlinear and chaotic phenomena, engineers started using analytical tools from “Qualitative Theory of Di ff erential Equations,”

allowing more precise analysis and synthesis, in order to produce new vital products and services. Bifurcation theory, dynamical systems and chaos started to be part of the mandatory set of tools for design engineers.

This proposed special edition of the Mathematical Prob- lems in Engineering aims to provide a picture of the impor- tance of the bifurcation theory, relating it with nonlinear and chaotic dynamics for natural and engineered systems.

Ideas of how this dynamics can be captured through precisely tailored real and numerical experiments and understanding by the combination of specific tools that associate dynamical system theory and geometric tools in a very clever, sophis- ticated, and at the same time simple and unique analytical environment are the subject of this issue, allowing new methods to design high-precision devices and equipment.

Authors should follow the Mathematical Problems in Engineering manuscript format described at http://www .hindawi.com/journals/mpe/. Prospective authors should submit an electronic copy of their complete manuscript through the journal Manuscript Tracking System at http://

mts.hindawi.com/ according to the following timetable:

Manuscript Due February 1, 2009 First Round of Reviews May 1, 2009 Publication Date August 1, 2009

Guest Editors

José Roberto Castilho Piqueira, Telecommunication and Control Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, The University of São Paulo, 05508-970 São Paulo, Brazil;

[email protected]

Elbert E. Neher Macau, Laboratório Associado de Matemática Aplicada e Computação (LAC), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São Josè dos Campos, 12227-010 São Paulo, Brazil ; [email protected] Celso Grebogi, Department of Physics, King’s College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK;

[email protected]

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

参照

関連したドキュメント

Ganigi, A certain class of meromorphically starlike functions with positive coefficients, Pure Appl..

Fekete-Szeg¨ o problem, close-to-convex functions, close- to-convex functions with respect to a starlike function, close-to-convex functions with argument

For a brief history of the Fekete-Szegö problem for the class of starlike, convex and close-to-convex functions, see the recent paper by Srivastava et

On the way to solving this problem, we prove an angle distortion theorem for starlike and spirallike functions with respect to interior and boundary points... Let D be a

Swaminathan, On Subclasses of uni- formly convex functions and corresponding class of starlike functions, Tamkang J.. Darwish, The Quasi-Hadamard product of certain starlike and

Running, Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of

Ronning, Unifomly convex functions and a corresponding class of starlike

obtain the radi us of $\beta$ -convexity for the class $ofp$ -fold starlike