VOL. 14 NO. 3
(1991)
451-456FUNCTIONS STARLIKE WITH RESPECT TO OTHER POINTS
S. ABDUL HALIM DeDt.
of Mathematics University of Malaya59100
KualaLumpur
Malays i a
(Received September 26, 1990 and in revised form March 5,
1991)
ABSTRACT.
In [7],
Sakaguchi introduce the class of functions starlike with respect to symmetric points. We extend this class. For 0.<
8 i, letS*(8)
be thes
class of normalised analytic functions f defined in the open unit disc D such that Re
zf’(z)/[f(z)-f(-z))
> 8, for some z e D. In this paper, we introduce 2 other similar classesS*(8),
S(8)
as well as give sharp results for the realc sc
part of some function for f e
S(8) S(8)
and S(8)
The behaviour of certains sc
integral operators are also considered.
KEY WORDS AND PHRASES. Starlike functions of order 8, functions starlike with respect
to8ynnetrical points, close-to-convex, integral operators.
AMS Subject Classification (1985 Revision): Primary
30 C 45.i. INTRODUCTION.
Let S be the class of analytic functions f, univalent in the unit disc
D lz Izl i},
withf(z)
z + E a zn(i.i)
n=2 n
For 0
.<
8 i, denote byS*(8),
the class of starlike functions of order 8.Then f e
S*(8)
if, and only if, for z eD,
!zf’ %),]
Re
f(z)
> 8.In
[7],
Sakaguchi introduced the classS*
of analytic functions f, normalised sby
(1.1)
which are starlike with respect to symmetrical points.We
begin by defining the class S* which is contained inK,
the class of close-to-convex functions.s’
DEFINITION 1.
A function f e S if, and only if, for z e
D,
sRe
f(Z)2f(iz)
> O.We now extend this definition as follows:
DEFINITION 2.
A function f with normalisations
.]J
is said to be starlike of order 8, with respect to symmetric points if, and only if, for z e D and 0.<
8 < l,We denote this class by
S*(8)
and note that S*S*(0).
s s s
In the same
manner,
we define the following new classes of close-to-convex functions, which are generalisations of the classes in E1-Ashwah and Thomas[2].
DEFINITION 3.
A function f normalised by
(1.1)
is said to be starlike of order 8, with respect to conjugate points if, and only if, for z e D and 0 8 < l,Re
2zf’(z) .
We denote this class by
S*(8).
c DEFINITION
4.
A function f normalised by
(1.1)
is said to be starlike of order 8, with respect to symmetric conjugate points if, and only if, for z eD
and 0.<
8 l,Re
/. ?_’.i._ .
We denote this class by S*
(8).
sc RE,%.RK.
The class S* has been studied by several authors,
(eg.
Wu[9]
and Stankiewicz[8]).
s
For f c
S*( 8),
Owa et al[4]
;)roved that for 8 <-s
2’
Re
f(z) f(-z)
3-48’
z e D.2. RESULTS.
THEOREM i.
Let
f eS*(8),
then for z rei8 e.D,
sRe -[f(z)-f(-z)]
zII(I-8) ">" 211(1-8)
2 >e 8/(1-8)
l+r The result is sharp for
fo
given byf0(z) fo(-Z) 2z(l+z2)
8-1To
prove Theorem i., we first require the following lemma.LEMMA
i.Let
g eS*(8)
andbe odd. Then for z reieD,
Re z >"
2"
l+r
PROOF OF
LEMM
Pinchuk
[5]
showed that if ieF e
S*(8),
then for z reD, ll2(1-s)
z -i
.<r.
Since g is odd, we may write
[g(z)]2 F(z 2),
so that(2.1)
givesz -i
.<r
(2.1)
where on squaring both sides, gives
Thus
r z
h
Ig(z)i
2 Re + 1.<
r2Re + i
z
>" l-rh
rl_r
h
>
+ 1(i+r2)2
where we have used the inequality
[6]
ig(z)l >.
(l+r2)
I-8for odd starlike functions of order 8.
The Lemma now follows at once.
PROOF OF THEORY4 i.
Since f e
S*(8),
it follows that we may write sg(z) (z)-f(-z)
2
for g an odd starlike function of order
8. An
application ofLemma
1 proves the Theorem.Results analogous to Theorem i THEOREM 2.
Let f
S*(8).
Then forC
can also be found for the classes z=reiS e
D,
s(6) a S*s(S).
Re f(z)+f()
l/2(1-6)
l+r
2(28-1)/2(1-8)
The result is sharp for
f(z)
+f() 2z(l+z) 2(8-I)
PROOFSince f e
S*(8),
it is easy to see that, ifC
F(z) f(z)+f()
then F a
S*(8).
from
(2.1)
thatUsing the same techniques as in the proof of
Lemma
i, it followsRe z
The result now follows immediately.
Similarly, we have the following result, which we state without proof.
THEOREM 3.
Let f S*
(8).
Then for z reD,
sc112(1-8)
2112tl_S
2
(28-1) 12(1-8)
Ref(z)-f(-)
>.
>z l+r
The resul is sharp for
f(z) f(-) 2z(l+z)
We now consider the results of some integral
operators. In [i]
Das and Singh, obtained analogous results of the Libera integraloperator.
They proved that for f eS*(0),
the function h given bys
t-l[
f(t)-f(-t) ]dt h(zJ
70
also belongs to
S*(0).
s
The result below generalises that of Das and Singh.
THEOREM
4.
Let f e
S*(8).
Then the functionH
defined by sH(z) a+__l
z
ta-l[f(t)_f(_t) ]dt,
2za
JO
(2.2)
also belongs to
S*(6) .for
zD
and a + 6 O.s
We first require the following Lemma due to Miller and Mocanu
[5].
LEMMA
2.Let
M
andN
be analytic inD
withM(O) N(O)
0 and let 6 be any real number. IfN(z)
mapsD onto
a(possibly
manysheeted)
region which is starlike with respect to the origin, then for z eD,
’(z) M(z)
Re
N--(z
>6
--->ReN--
> 6,and
PROOF OF THEOREM
h.
(2.2)
ives,2zH’
(z) H(z)-H(-z)
Re
M’ z) M(z)
N’ z)
<6
---->ReN(--
<6.
Iz ta-l[
za[ f(z)-f(-z) ]-a f(
t)-f(-t ]dt
JO
z
ta-l[ f( t)-f(-t
dt 0(z)
N-V’
say.Note
thatM(O) N(O)
0 and for fS*(6),
s
zN"(z)
[--z[ i (z)+f’ (-z) ]
i:
+N’ ()
+Thus
N(z)
is starlike if, and only if a > -8.Furthermore, since
Re N’ (z) Re (z)-f(-) iI
>"
Lemma
2 shows thatH
eS*(8).
s
Finally, we give the following analogous results for the classes
S(8)
and S(8).
c sc
THEOREM
5.
Let f
S*(8).
c ThenH
defined byH(z) a+--!l [z ta_l[f(t + f(----]dt, (2.3)
2za
Jo
also belongs to
S*(8)
for z eD
and a + > 0.c PROOF.
Since f e
S*(8), (2.3)
gives cThus
ta-l[f(t)
+f(:)]dt
2 ta-It + Y. Re dt
0 0
n=2
2z
H’(z) H(z)
+H(:)
=2
ZRea
0
n=2
nz
ta_l If(t)
+f(:)]dt
0
fz ta_l
za[f(z)
+f()]
a[f(t)
+f()]dt
0
z
ta_l[f(t + f(:)]dt
0
where
M(0) N(0)
0 andN
e S*
for a +8
> 0.On using
Lemma
2 it follows thatH
eS*(8)
c
THEOREM 6.
Let f e S*
(8).
ThenH
defined by scH(z) a+--!l [z ta_l[f{t f(-:)]dt,
2za
0
also belongs to
S* (8)
for zD
and a +8
> 0.sc
PROOF.
For f e S*
(8), (2.4)
gives SCHi-i)
a+lf-z
t(-z)
a 0a-l[f(t) f(-)]dt
a + i
2(-z)
a+l(-z) n+a
z)a
a + in=
2 n + a(-n
+(-l)n+lan)}
-(a+l)
zaz
0ta_l[f(t f(-)]dt.
As before, writing
2zH’(z) H(z) H(-I)
M(z) N(z)’
one can show that N e S* and hence using Lemma 2 the result follows.
REFERENCES
i.
R.N.Das
and P.Singh, On subclasses of schlicht mapping, Indian J. Pure Appl.Math.,
8, (1977), 864-872.
2. R.M.Ei-Ashwah and D.K.Thomas, Some subclasses of close-to-convex functions, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc.
.2.(i), (1987) 85-100.
3. S.S.Miller and
P.T.Mocanu,
Second order differential inequalities in the complex plane,J...
Math.Ana.. Appl.., 65, (1978), 289-304.
4. S.Owa, Z.Wu
andF.Ren,
A note on certain subclass of Sakaguchi functions, Bull. de laRoyale.
deLiege, 57(3), (1988), 143-150.
5.
B.Pinchuk, On starlike and convex functions of order 8, Duke Math. Journal,35., (1968), 721-734.
6.
M.S.Robertson, On the theory of univalent functions, Ann.Math., 3.7, (1936), 374-408.
7.
K.Sakaguchi, On a certain univalent mapping, J.Math...Soc. Jpa.n,
ii,(1959), 72-75.
8.
J.Stankiewicz, Some remarks on functions starlike w.r.t, symmetric points, Ann. Univ. Marie CurieSklodowska 19( 7), (1965), 53-59.
9. Z.Wu,
On classes of Sakaguchi functions and Hadamard products, Sci. Sinica Set.A,
30,(1987), 128-135.
Special Issue on
Modeling Experimental Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaotic Scenarios
Call for Papers
Thinking about nonlinearity in engineering areas, up to the 70s, was focused on intentionally built nonlinear parts in order to improve the operational characteristics of a device or system. Keying, saturation, hysteretic phenomena, and dead zones were added to existing devices increasing their behavior diversity and precision. In this context, an intrinsic nonlinearity was treated just as a linear approximation, around equilibrium points.
Inspired on the rediscovering of the richness of nonlinear and chaotic phenomena, engineers started using analytical tools from “Qualitative Theory of Di ff erential Equations,”
allowing more precise analysis and synthesis, in order to produce new vital products and services. Bifurcation theory, dynamical systems and chaos started to be part of the mandatory set of tools for design engineers.
This proposed special edition of the Mathematical Prob- lems in Engineering aims to provide a picture of the impor- tance of the bifurcation theory, relating it with nonlinear and chaotic dynamics for natural and engineered systems.
Ideas of how this dynamics can be captured through precisely tailored real and numerical experiments and understanding by the combination of specific tools that associate dynamical system theory and geometric tools in a very clever, sophis- ticated, and at the same time simple and unique analytical environment are the subject of this issue, allowing new methods to design high-precision devices and equipment.
Authors should follow the Mathematical Problems in Engineering manuscript format described at http://www .hindawi.com/journals/mpe/. Prospective authors should submit an electronic copy of their complete manuscript through the journal Manuscript Tracking System at http://
mts.hindawi.com/ according to the following timetable:
Manuscript Due February 1, 2009 First Round of Reviews May 1, 2009 Publication Date August 1, 2009
Guest Editors
José Roberto Castilho Piqueira, Telecommunication and Control Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, The University of São Paulo, 05508-970 São Paulo, Brazil;
[email protected]
Elbert E. Neher Macau, Laboratório Associado de Matemática Aplicada e Computação (LAC), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São Josè dos Campos, 12227-010 São Paulo, Brazil ; [email protected] Celso Grebogi, Department of Physics, King’s College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK;
[email protected]
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com