• 検索結果がありません。

Properties of a class of multivalent functions starlike with respect to symmetric and conjugate points

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Properties of a class of multivalent functions starlike with respect to symmetric and conjugate points"

Copied!
15
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Properties of a class of multivalent functions starlike with respect to symmetric and conjugate points

1

S. M. Khairnar, S. M. Rajas

Abstract

Let S be the class of functions analytic and multivalent in the open unit disc given by

f(z) =zp+ X n=1

ap+nzp+n and anC.

In this paper we have studied three subclasses

SsM(α, β, δ), ScM(α, β, δ) andSscM(α, β, δ)

consisting of analytic functions with negative coefficients and starlike with respect to symmetric points, starlike with respect to conjugate points and starlike with respect to symmetric conjugate points, respec- tively. Here, we discuss coefficient inequality, growth and distortion the- orems, extreme points, closure theorems and convolution properties of these classes.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45, 30C50.

1Received 12 September, 2008

Accepted for publication (in revised form) 10 October, 2008

15

(2)

Key words and phrases: Analytic functions, Multivalent functions, Starlike with respect to symmetric points, distortion bounds, Convolution

theorem.

1 Introduction

LetS be the class of functions analytic and multivalent in the open unit disc given by

(1) f(z) =zp+

X n=1

ap+nzp+n and anC.

LetM be the subclass ofS consisting of functionsf of the form

(2) f(z) =zp

X n=1

ap+nzp+n

wherean0, an∈IR.

In [5], Sakaguchi introduced the class of analytic functions which are univalent and starlike with respect to symmetric points. This class is denoted bySs and satisfiesRe

n zf0 f(z)−f(−z)

o

>0 forz∈ID.

This definition has given rise to many generalized and extended classes of functions. The subclasses SsM(α, β, δ), ScM(α, β, δ) and SscM(α, β, δ) con- sisting of analytic functions with negative coefficients were introduced by Halim and A. Janteng in [1] and are respectively starlike with respect to symmetric points, starlike with respect to conjugate points and starlike with respect to symmetric conjugate points. Hereα, β and δ satisfy the conditions 0≤α < 1,0< β <1,0≤δ < pand 0 < 2(1−β)1+αβ <1. This paper extends the result in [2] to other properties namely distortion, convex combination and convolution.

(3)

Let S be the subclass ofS consisting of functions starlike inD. Notice that f ∈S iff Re

³zf0 f

´

>0 forz∈D.

Consider Ss, the subclass of S consisting of function given by (1) consisting of function given by (1) satisfying

Re

½ zf0(z) f(z)−f(−z)

¾

>0, z∈D.

These functions are called starlike with respect to symmetric points and were introduced by Sakaguchi in [5]. The same class is also considered by Robertson [8], Stankiewicz [4], Z. Wu [14], Owa and Z. Wu [13] and Aini Janteng, M.

Darus [2]. K. M. El-Ashwah and Thomas in [10], have introduced two other subclasses namelySc andSsc .

In [14], Sudarshan et. al and Aini Janteng, M. Darus [2] have discussed the subclassesSsM(α, β, δ) of functions f analytic and univalent inID and satis- fying the condition

¯¯

¯¯ zf0(z)

f(z)(−z) (p+δ)

¯¯

¯¯< β

¯¯

¯¯ αzf0(z)

f(z)−f(−z) + (p−δ)

¯¯

¯¯

for some 0≤α≤1,0< β≤1,0≤δ < p andz∈ID.

However, in this paper we consider the subclassM defined by (2).

Definition 1 A function f ∈SsM(α, β, δ) is said to be starlike with respect to symmetric points if it satisfies

¯¯

¯¯ zf0(z)

f(z)−f(−z) (p+δ)

¯¯

¯¯< β

¯¯

¯¯ αzf0(z)

f(z)−f(−z)+ (p−δ)

¯¯

¯¯ for p∈N and z∈D.

Definition 2 A function f ∈ScM(α, β, δ) is said to be starlike with respect to conjugate points if it satisfies

¯¯

¯¯

¯

zf0(z)

f(z) +f(z) (p+δ)

¯¯

¯¯

¯< β

¯¯

¯¯

¯

αzf0(z)

f(z) +f(z) + (p−δ)

¯¯

¯¯

¯ for p∈N and z∈D.

(4)

Definition 3 A functionf ∈Ssc M(α, β, δ) is said to be starlike with respect to symmetric conjugate points if it satisfies

¯¯

¯¯

¯

zf0(z)

f(z)−f(−z) (p+δ)

¯¯

¯¯

¯< β

¯¯

¯¯

¯

αzf0(z)

f(z)−f(−z) + (p−δ)

¯¯

¯¯

¯ for p∈N and z∈D.

Notice that the above conditions imposed on α, β and δ in the introduction are necessary to ensure that these classes form a subclass of S.

First we state the preliminary results similar to those obtained by Halim et.

al. in [1], required for proving our main results.

2 Preliminaries

Theorem 1 f ∈SsM(α, β, δ) if and only if (3)

X n=1

(1+βα)(p+n)+[1−βp+δ(1+β)][(−1)p+n−1]

β{αp+(p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+(−1)p(p+δ)−δ ap+n1 for p∈N Corollary 1 If f ∈SsM(α, β, δ) then

ap+n β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ (1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1], for p∈N and n≥1.

Theorem 2 f ∈ScM(α, β, δ) if and only if (4)

X n=1

(1 +βα)(p+n) + 2[p(β−1)−δ(1 +β)]

β{αp+ 2(p−δ)} −(p+ 2δ) ap+n1 for p∈N.

Corollary 2 If f ∈ScM(α, β, δ) then ap+n β{αp+ 2(p−δ)} −(p+ 2δ)

(1 +βα)(p+n) + 2[p(β−1)−δ(1 +β)] for p∈N and n≥1.

(5)

Theorem 3 f ∈SscM(α, β, δ) if and only if (5)

X n=1

(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ ap+n1, for p∈N.

Corollary 3 If f ∈SscM(α, β, δ) then

ap+n β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ (1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1], for p∈N and n≥1.

3 Growth and Distortion Theorems

Theorem 4 Let the function f be defined by (2) and belong to the class SsM(α, β, δ). Then for {z: 0<|z|=r <1},

r−β{α+ 2(1−δ)} −(1 + 2δ)

2(1 +βα) r2 ≤ |f(z)| ≤r+β{α+ 2(1−δ)} −(1 + 2δ) 2(1 +βα) r2, for p∈N.

Proof. Letf(z) =zp P

n=1

ap+nzp+n, p∈N.

|f(z)| ≤|z|p+ X n=1

ap+n|z|p+n (6)

≤ |z|p+|z|p+1 X n=1

ap+n

≤ |z|p+|z|p+1 β{αp+(p−δ)(1−(−1)p)}+(−1)p(p+δ)−δ (1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)(−1)p+11]

=rp+ β{αp+ (p−δ)(1−(−1)p)}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11]rp+1.

(6)

Similarly,

|F(z)| ≥ |z|p X n=1

ap+n|z|p+n (7)

≥ |z|p− |z|p+1 X n=1

ap+n

≥ |z|p− |z|p+1 β{αp+ (p−δ)(1−(−1)p)}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ (1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11]

=rp β{αp+ (p−δ)(1−(−1)p)}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11]rp+1. Hence the result.

The result is sharp for

(8) f(z) =zp β{αp+ (−δ)(1(−1)p)}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11]zp+1 atz=±r.

Next we state similar results for functions belonging to ScM(α, β, δ) and SscM(α, β, δ). Method of proof is same as in Theorem 4.

Theorem 5 Let the function f be defined by (2) and belong to the class ScM(α, β, δ), then for{z: 0<|z|=r <1},

rp β{αp+ 2(p−δ)} −(p+ 2δ)

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + 2[p(β1)−δ(1 +β)]rp+1≤ |f(z)|

≤rp+ β{αp+ 2(p−δ)} −(p+ 2δ)

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + 2[p(β1)−δ(1 +β)]rp+1. The result is sharp for

(9) f(z) =zp β{αp+ 2(p−δ)} −(p+ 2δ)

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + 2[p(β1)−δ(1 +β)]zp+1.

Theorem 6 Let the function f be defined by (2) and belong to the class SscM(α, β, δ). Then for {z: 0<|z|=r <1},

rp β{αp+ 2(p−δ)}[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11]rp+1 ≤ |f(z)|

≤rp+ β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11]rp+1.

(7)

The result sharp for

(10) f(z) =zp β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ (1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11]zp+1 at z=±r.

Theorem 7 Let f ∈SsM(α, β, δ), then for{z: 0<|z|=r <1}

prp−1(p+ 1)β{αp+ (p−δ)(1−(−1)p)}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + (1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11] rp ≤ |f0(z)| ≤ prp−1+(p+ 1)β{αp+ (p−δ)(1−(−1)p)}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11] rp. The result is sharp for function given by (8).

Theorem 8 Let f be the function defined by (2) and belonging to the class ScM(α, β, δ), then for{z: 0<|z|=r <1}

prp−1 (p+ 1)β{αp+ 2(p−δ)} −(p+ 2δ)

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + 2[p(β1)−δ(1 +β)]rp ≤ |f0(z)|

≤prp−1+ β(p+ 1){αp+ 2(p−δ)} −(p+ 2δ) (1 +βα)(p+ 1) + 2[p(β1)−δ(1 +β)]rp. The result is sharp for the function given by (9).

Theorem 9 Let f be the function defined by (2) and belonging to the class SscM(α, β, δ), then for{z: 0<|z|=r <1}

prp−1(p+ 1)β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)](−1)p+11] rp≤ |f0(z)|

≤prp−1+(p+ 1)β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1p)(p+δ)−δ (1 +βα)(p+ 1) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+11] rp. The result is sharp for the function given by (10).

1−β{α+ 2(1−δ)} −(1 + 2δ)

(1 +βα) r ≤ |f0(z)1 +β{α+ 2(1−δ)} −(1 + 2δ)

(1 +βα) r.

(8)

The result is sharp for

f(z) =z−β{α+ 2(1−δ)} −(1 + 2δ) 2(1 +βα) z2 at z=±r and for p= 1∈N.

4 Closure Theorems

All three subclasses discussed here are closed under convex linear combina- tions. We prove for the class SsM(α, β, δ). It can be proved similarly for ScM(α, β, δ) and SscM(α, β, δ).

Theorem 10 Consider fj(z) =zp

X n=1

ap+nzp+n∈SsM(α, β, δ) for j= 1,2,3,· · · , ` andp∈N then

g(z) = X` j=1

cjfj(z)∈SsM(α, β, δ) where X` j=1

cj = 1.

Proof. Let

g(z) = X` j=1

cj Ã

zp X n=1

ap+n,jzp+n

!

= zp X n=1

zp+n X` j=1

cjap+n,j

= zp X n=1

ep+nzp+n

whereep+n= P`

j=1

cj, ap+n,j.

(9)

Nowg(z)∈SsM(α, β, δ) since X

n=1

(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p] + (−1)p(p+δ)−δ ep+n

X n=1

X` j=1

(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ cjap+n,j

X` j=1

cj = 1 since, X

n=1

(1 +βα)(p+n)[1−βp+δ(1 +β)[(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p] + (−1)p(p+δ)−δ ap+n,j 1.

5 Extreme Points

Theorem 11 Let fp(z) =zp,

fp+n(z) =zp β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]zp+n for n≥1 and p∈N, then f ∈SsM(α, β, δ) if and only if it can be expressed as in the form

f(z) = X n=0

λp+nfp+n(z)

where λp+n0 and P

n=0

λp+n= 1, p∈N.

Proof. Let f(z) =

X n=0

λp+nfp+n(z), p∈N (11)

=zp X n=1

λp+n β{αp+(p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+(−1)p(p+δ)−δ (1+βα)(p+n)+[1−βp+δ(1+p)][(−1)p+n−1)zp+n

(10)

Nowf(z)∈SsM(α, β, δ) since X

n=1

·(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

¸

· β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ (1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

¸ λp+n

= X n=1

λp+n= 1−λp 1, p∈N.

Conversely, suppose thatf ∈SsM(α, β, δ). Then by Corollary 1 ap+n β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1], n≥1.

Set (12)

λp+n= (1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ ap+n, n≥1, p∈N and λp = 1 P

n=1

λp+n thenf(z) = P

n=0

λp+nfp+n(z).

Similarly extreme points for functions belonging to ScM(α, β, δ) and SscM(α, β, δ) are found.

Method of proving Theorem 12 and Theorem 13 are similar to that of Theorem 11.

Theorem 12 Let fp(z) =zp,

fp+n(z) =zp β(αp+ 2(p−δ))−(p+ 2δ)

(1 +βα)(p+n) + 2[p(β−1)−δ(1 +β)]zp+n

for n≥1 andp∈N. Thenf ∈ScM(α, β, δ) if and only if it can be expressed in the form

f(z) = X n=0

λp+nfp+n(z) where λp+n0 and X n=0

λp+n= 1.

(11)

Theorem 13 Let fp(z) =zp

fp+n(z) =zp β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]zp+n forn≥1andp∈N. Thenf ∈SscM(α, β, δ)if and only if it can be expressed in the form

f(z) = X n=0

λp+nfp+n(z) where λp+n0 and X n=0

λp+n= 1.

6 Convolution Theorems

The three subclassesSsM(α, β, δ), ScM(α, β, δ) and SscM(α, β, δ) are closed under convolution. We prove first for the classSsM(α, β, δ).

Theorem 14 Let f, g∈SsM(α, β, δ) where f(z) =zp

X n=1

ap+nzp+n and g(z) =zp X n=1

bp+nzp+n

thenf ∗g∈SsM(α, β, ν). For

[(p+n) + (1 +δ)[(−1)p+n1]][N]2+ [δ(−1)p(p+δ)][D]2

[αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]][D]2− {α(p+n) + (δ−p)[(−1)p+n1][N]2 < ν where

N = β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ D = (1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1].

Proof. We havef ∈SsM(α, β, δ) if and only if (13)

X n=1

(1 +βα)(p+n) + (1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ ap+n1.

Similarly (14)

X n=1

(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ bp+n1.

(12)

To find a smallest numberν such that (15)

X n=1

(1 +να)(p+n) + [1−νp+δ(1 +ν)][(−1)p+n1]

ν{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ ap+nbp+n1.

By Cauchy Schwarz inequality (13) and (14) imply (16)

X n=1

(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ

pap+nbp+n1

(15) will hold for

(1 +να)(p+n) + [1−νp+δ(1 +ν)][(−1)p+n1]

ν{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ ap+nbp+n

(1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ q

ap+nbp+n]β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p] + (−1)p(p+δ)−δ p

ap+nbp+n,

that is if

pap+nbp+n≤ {[ν{αp+(p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+(−1)p(p+δ)−δ][(1+βα)(p+n) (17)

+[1−βp+δ(1 +δ)][(−1)p+n1]}/{[β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}

+(−1)p(p+δ)−δ][(1 +να)(p+n) + [1−νp+δ(1 +ν)][(−1)p+n1]}

(16) implies (18) p

ap+nbp+n β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ (1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]. Thus it is enough to show that

β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ (1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]

≤ {[ν{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ][(1 +βα)(p+n) +[1−βp+δ(1 +β)][(−1)p+n1]}/{[β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}

+(−1)p(p+δ)−δ][(1 +να)(p+n) + [1−νp+δ(1 +ν)][(−1)p+n1]}

(13)

which implies to

(p+n) + (1 +δ)[(−1)p+n1][N]2+ [δ(−1)p(p+δ)][D]2

[αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]][D]2− {α(p+n) + (δ−p)[(−1)p+n1][N]2 ≤ν where

N = β{αp+ (p−δ)[1−(−1)p]}+ (−1)p(p+δ)−δ D = (1 +βα)(p+n) + [1−βp+δ(1 +β)[(−1)p+n1]

Theorem 15 Let f, g∈ScM(α, β, δ) then f∗g∈ScM(α, β, ν) for [(p+n)−2(p+δ)][N]2(p+ 2δ)[D]2

[αp+ 2(p−δ)][D]2[α(p+n) + 2(p−δ)][N]2 ≤ν where

N = β{αp+ 2(p−δ)}+ (p+ 2δ)

D = (1 =βα)(p+n) + 2[p(β−1)−δ(1 +β)].

Convolution theorem for subclassSscM(α, β, δ) is similar to Theorem 14.

Acknowledgements: The first author is thankful and acknowledges the support from the research projects funded from the Department of Science and Technology, (Ref. No. SR/S4/MS:544/08), Government of India, Na- tional Board of Higher Mathematics, Department of Atomic Energy, (Ref.

No.NBHM/DAE/R.P.2/09), Government of India and BCUD, University of Pune (UOP), Pune, (Ref No.BCUD, Engg.2009), and UGC New Delhi.

References

[1] S.A. Halim, A. Janteng, M. Darus,Coefficient properties for classes with negative coefficients and starlike with respect to other points, Proceeding

(14)

of 13th Mathematical Sciences National Symposium, UUM,2, 2005, 658- 653.

[2] Aini Janteng, M. Darus,Classes with negative coefficients and starlike with respect to other points, International Mathematical Forum,2(46), 2007, 2261-2268.

[3] H. Silverman,Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc. Amer.

Math. Soc.,51(1), 1975, 109-116.

[4] J. Stankiewicz, Some remances on functions starlike with respect to sym- metric points, Ann. Univ. Marie Curie Sklodowsia,19(7), 1965, 53-59.

[5] E.K.Sakaguchi, On certain univalent mapping, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 11, 1959,72-75.

[6] K. Al Shaqsi, M. Darus, On subclass of harmonic starlike functions with respect tok-symmetric points, International Mathematical Forum,2(57), 2007, 2799-2805.

[7] K. Al Shaqsi, M. Darus 2007. On subclass of close-to-convex functions, Int. Jour. Contemp. Math. Sci.,2(15), 745-757.

[8] M. I. S. Robertson, Applications of the subordination principle to univa- lent functions, Pacific J. of Math., 11, 1961, 315-324.

[9] V. Ravichandran,Starlike and convex functions with respect to conjugate points, Acta Math. Acad. Paedgog, Nyiregyhazi, 20, 2004, 31-37.

[10] R. M. El.Ashwah, D. K. Thomas,Some subclasses of close-to-convex func- tions, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc., 2, 1987, 86-100.

(15)

[11] S. M. Khairnar, Meena More, Subclass of univalent functions with neg- ative coefficient and starlike with respect to symmetric and conjugate points, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 2(35), 2008, 1739-1748.

[12] P. L. Duren, Univalent functions, Grundlehren Math. Kpiss. Vol. 259, Springer Verlag, New York, 1083.

[13] S.Owa, Z. Wu, F. Reu,A note on certain subclass of Sakaguchi functions, Bull. de la Royale de liege,57(3), 1988, 143-150.

[14] T. V. Sudarshan, P. Balasubrahmanayan, K. G. Subramanian, On func- tions starlike with respect to symmetric and conjugate points, Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics,2(1), 1996, 57-68.

[15] Z. Wu,On classes of Sakaguch functions with respect Hadamard products, Sci. Sinica Ser. A,30, 1987, 128-135.

S. M. Khairnar

Department of Mathematics

Maharashtra Academy of Engineering Alandi, Pune - 412105, M. S., India e-mail: [email protected] S. M. Rajas

Department of Mathematics

G. H. Raisoni Institute of Engineering and Technology Pune - 412207, M. S. India

e-mail: sachin[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント