The Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
The JapanesePsychonomic Society
Thellapanese
fournal
e.fPsychonomic Seience20e5,VoL24,)"o,1,125-126
Summary
ofAwardedPresentationIP75
The
effect
of
motion
information
on
infants'
recognition
of
unfamiliarfaces
Yumiko
OTsuKA,i・
2So
KANAzAwA,3
Masami
K.
YAMAGucHi,i
Alice
J.
O'TooLE,4
andHerv6
ABDi`
Chuo [iniversilyi,
jopan
Sociedy
for
ehel]},omotion
of
Science2,
Shuhutohu Ciniversit.y3.Universit.v
of
Texas at Dallas4We
examined the role of motion iniormation oninfants'
recognition of unfamiliar faces.Previous
studies suggestedthat
motioninformation
promotes infants'perception(Kellman
&Spclke, 1983; Otsuka
&
Yamaguchi,2003),
and thereforewe theorized that motion informationshould facilitate
infants'
face recognition, Inthe present study, we cornpared infants'recognltion memoryfor
unfamiliarfaces
learnedinamoving or a static condition. Infantsaged3-
to5-months(N'--
24)w'erc familiarizedwith asmilingfemale
face
eithcr inthemoving or static condition, Afterfamiliarizution,infant$were testedusing a pairof novel and
iamiliar
female
Caces,
We
feund
that
the infantsshowed a significant preference for novel
faces
only in the moving condition. Thepresent results suggcst thatlearning from thernoving condition promotes
infants'
recognition ofunfamiliar faces.
Key
words: movingface,
unfam"iar face,infantsTherc are two hypothcses about the possib]e role
of motion information
in
thcface
recognition: the supplementalinformatton
hypothesis andthe
repre-sentation enhancement hypot.hesis(O'Toole,
Roark,& Abdi, 2002). The supplemental
inforrnation
hy-pothesis positsthatmotion information contributes
to
face
recognition through supplying additionalidentity
information
to
the
invariant
structure oftheface
(e,g.
facialmovements characteristic totheindividualsuch as the way of srnJling).
This
hypo-thesispredicts that tnotion information weuld be
more effectivc for familiar
faces
than unfarniliarfaces.
This
is
because
some experience with a facemay be needed tolearnwhich movements are char-acteristic te the individuaL The representatien
en-hancement hypothesis positsthat motion
informa-tion contributes to
face
recognition by facilitatingthe perception of facialstructure.
According
tothishypothesis,
theeffect of motioninformation
dependso.n. the perception ef faccs rather than the prior ex-1Departmcnt
of Psychology,
Chuo
University,742L1,
Higashinakano,
Hachioji-shi,
Tokyo
192-0393This research was supported by RISTEX
Japan
Science
Technology Agency, and aGrant-in-Aid
forscientific research
(15500172)
from
JSPS,
andChuo
University
Joint
Research Grant,Copyright 2005.
perience with a face.Thus, the representation
en-hancement
hypothesis predicts that the effect ofmotion information would be found forboth
famil-iarand unfarniliar
faces.
As a matter of fact,studies with adult participants reveal afundarnental
differ-ence intheeffect of rnetlon for
familiar
andunfamil-iar faces
{O'Toole
et al.2002),
Although
afacili-tativeeffect of motion isconsistently found
for
therecognition of familiarfaces,thiseffect
is
lessclearforthe recognition of unfamiliar
faces,
Aim of
the
present study was to examine theroleof motion information on infants'recognition of
un-familiar
faces.Several previous studies havesug-gested that rnotien
information
prometesinfants'
perception
(Kellman
&
Spelke, 1983;Otsuka
&Ya-maguchL 2003>.Therefore we theorizedthatmotion
information should
facilitate
infants'
facerecogni-tioneven
for
thefacesunfamiliar tothe infants,Wecompared
infants'
recognition memory forunfamil-iar
faces
which were learned ina moving or astaticcondition.
Method
Participants
Twenty-fourhea]thy3-te5-month-olds
(mean
age=-'-128.6days,
rangingfrom
81 to 162The Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
TheJapanesePsychonomic Society
126 The
Japanese
Journal
of Psychonomic Scjence Vol.
(a)MovinglStatic
(b}StaticFigurel.
Examples
of the familiarizationstimuli
(a),
and thetest
stimuli(b).
Tablc 1Prcfercnce
for
nevel face mean preferencescores
in
percentages, standarddeviation,
and tscores
{vs.
chance)Static
cendition 24,No. 1Moving
conditionM
63.12 45.00SD
14.21
11.37t
3./.?.*.
i,52
EP
<.O1,
two-tailedtest.days) participatedinthisexperiment. An additional
11 infants were excluded from the ana]ysis due to
fussiness
(3>
or sidebias
greaterthan90
%
(6>,
ordue
to looking times in the familiarizationtrialsthat
were less
than
20s
(2).
Apparatus
All
oi thestimuli weredisplayed
on a21-inch CRT monitor.
The
infant's
viewing distancewas approximate]y 40cm. A CCD camera
just
belowthe monitor screen was used to videotape the
behav-ior
ofinfant
throughout the experiment.Stimuli All of the stimuli were produced from
two video recordings, which were taken inthe Uni-versity of
Texas
atDallas.
The
familiarization
stim-uli consisted of a smiHngfemale
face
seen eitherin
a moving or astatic condition. A moving stimulus was composed of 33frames,
which were shown at a rateof
25
frames
per second.A
static stimulus wascom-posed of thelast
frame
of the moving stimulus(Fig-ure la).The size of the familiarizationstimuli was
220
on cach sidc,Test
stirnuli consisted of a staticfemale iacewith aneutral expTession
CFigure
1b)forall infants.Hair was excluded so that only the
inter-nal
features
were visible.The
sizeof the teststimuliwas 16" x lg",
Procedure First,the
infants
were familiarizedwith a smiling female face which was
displayed
ineither a moving or static condition en the center of
theCRT rnonitor. The fami]iarizationtrialwas
com-posed of 2 presentations,each of 15 seconds, Aftcr
familiarization,
infants
were testedusing one nove]and one familiar faces which were shown side by
side. The testtrialswere composed of 2
presenta-tions,each of 10 seconds
duration.
in which theposition of the novel and the familiar
face
wasre-versed, The
familiarization
facedirferedbetween
theinfantsso that the novel and farniliarrelationship of
the teststimuli was reversed,
Infants'
looking timesfor
each stimulus were measuredbased
on the video recordings, Only the infanVs looking behavior was visiblein
the
video.
Results
andDiscussion
The totallooking time during 2 familiarizatien
trialsdid not differbetween the moving and static conditions
(t<22)=O.53,
P=.6,
two-tailed).Wecalcu-lateda preference seore for each infant,This was
done by dividing the infanVs looking time
to
thenovel
female
face
during
2 test trialsby
the totallooking time over thesetesttrials,and then
multiply-ing
this
ratio by 100.Two-tailed one-sample t-tests(vs.
a chancelevel
ef 50%) revealed significantpref-erence in the rnoving condition
(t(11)=3.2,
P<,Ol)
but not in the static condition,
(t(ll)=1.52,
P=.16).
These results suggest that infantscould learn
unfa-miliar
face
onlyin
themoving condition.The
present resu]ts suggest thatlearningfrom themovingcondi-tion prornotes infants' recognition of unfamiliar
faces,
In
centrastto
the studies with adultpartici-pants,we
found
facilitative
effect of motioninforma-tionfor
the
recognition of unfamiliar facesininfants.Our
finding
suggests that motien informatjoncon-tributes to the recognition of unfamiliar
faces
in
young infants who are
in
the course of perceptualdevelopment.
References
Kellman, P,
J,
&
Spelke,E.S.1983 CQgnitiveogy, 15(4):483-524,
0'Toole,A.
J.
Roark, D,A,&
AbdL
H.
20e2 Trends in