• 検索結果がありません。

Using this de- composition theorem, we prove that ifa,b∈B(A) witha∧b=F, thenAais isomorphic toAbif and only if there exists an isomorphismφonAsuch thatφ(a)=b

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Using this de- composition theorem, we prove that ifa,b∈B(A) witha∧b=F, thenAais isomorphic toAbif and only if there exists an isomorphismφonAsuch thatφ(a)=b"

Copied!
8
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

G. C. RAO AND P. SUNDARAYYA

Received 12 April 2005; Revised 12 December 2005; Accepted 18 December 2005

We prove that ifA is aC-algebra, then for eachaA, Aa= {xA/xa} is itself a C-algebra and is isomorphic to the quotient algebra A/θa of A where θa= {(x,y) A×A/ax=ay}. IfAisC-algebra withT, we prove that for everyaB(A), the centre ofA,Ais isomorphic toAa×Aa and that ifAis isomorphicA1×A2, then there existsaB(A) such thatA1is isomorphicAaandA2is isomorphic toAa. Using this de- composition theorem, we prove that ifa,bB(A) withab=F, thenAais isomorphic toAbif and only if there exists an isomorphismφonAsuch thatφ(a)=b.

Copyright © 2006 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.

Introduction

In [1], Guzm´an and Squier introduced the variety ofC-algebras as a class of algebras of type (2, 2, 1) satisfying certain identities and proved that this variety is generated by the 3-element algebraC= {T,F,U}which is the algebraic semantic of the three valued conditional logic. In [3] Swamy et al. introduced the concept of the centreB(A)= {x A/xx=T}of aC-algebraAwithTand proved thatB(A) is a Boolean algebra with induced operations and is equivalent to the Boolean Centre ofA. In [2], Rao and Sun- darayya defined a partial ordering on aC-algebraAand the properties ofAas a poset are studied.

In this paper, we prove that ifAis aC-algebra, then for eachxA,Ax= {sA/sx} is itself aC-algebra and is isomorphic to the quotient algebraA/θx, whereθx= {(s,t) A×A/xs=xt}. IfAis aC-algebra withTthen, for everyaB(A),Ais isomorphic toAa×Aa and conversely ifAis isomorphic toA1×A2, then there exists an element aB(A) such thatA1is isomorphic toAaandA2is isomorphic toAa. Using the above decomposition theorem we prove that for anya,bB(A) withab=F,Aais isomor- phic toAbif and only if there exists an isomorphism onAwhich sendsatob.

1. Preliminaries

First, we recall the definition of aC-algebra and some results, which will be used in the later text.

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Volume 2006, Article ID 78981, Pages1–8

DOI10.1155/IJMMS/2006/78981

(2)

By aC-algebra we mean an algebra of type (2, 2, 1) with operations,, andsatisfy- ing the following properties:

(a)x=x;

(b) (xy)=xy; (c) (xy)z=x(yz);

(d)x(yz)=(xy)(xz);

(e) (xy)z=(xz)(xyz);

(f)x(xy)=x;

(g) (xy)(yx)=(yx)(xy).

Clearly, every Boolean algebra is aC-algebra. The set{T,F,U}is aC-algebra with oper- ations,, andgiven by

T F U

T T F U

F F F F

U U U U

T F U

T T T T

F T F U

U U U U

X X

T F

F T

U U

We denote this three-elementC-algebra byCand the two-elementC-algebra (Boolean algebra){T,F}by B. It can be observed that the identities (a), (b) imply that the variety of allC-algebras satisfies the dual statements of (b) to (g). In generalandare not commutative inCand the ordinary right distributive law ofoverfails inC.

The following properties of aC-algebra can be verified directly [1,3]:

(i)xx=x;

(ii)xy=x(xy)=(xy)x;

(iii)x(xx)=(xx)x=x; (iv) (xx)y=(xy)(xy);

(v)xx=xx;

(vi)xyx=xy; (vii)xxy=xx.

If aC-algebraAhas an identity for, then it is unique and we denote it byT. In this case, we say thatAis aC-algebra withT. If we write F forT, then F is the identity for. In aC-algebra, we have the following [1,3]:

(viii)xy=Fif and only ifx=y=F;

(ix) ifxy=T, thenxx=T; (x)xT=xx;

(xi)Tx=TandFx=F;

(xii) foraA,a=aif and only ifais left zero of bothand.

If there exists an elementxinAsuch thatx=x, then it is unique and we denote it by U(Uis called the uncertain element ofA). An elementxAis called a central element ofAifxx=T. The set{xA/xx=T}of all central elements ofAis called the centre ofAand is denoted byB(A). The setB(A) of all central elements ofAis a Boolean algebra with respect to the operations,, and(ofA) restricted toB(A) [3].

(3)

ForxAdefine the relationθxonAbyθx= {(p,q)A×A/xp=xq}thenθxis a congruence relation onAandθxθx=θxx[1].

The relationdefined on aC-algebraAbyxyifyx=xis a partial ordering onA in which, for everyxA, the supremum of{x,x} =xx, and the infimum of{x,x} = xx[2]. IfAis aC-algebra withT,xB(A) and yAare such that xy=yx, thenxyis the lub of{x,y}and in this case yxneed not be the lub ofxand y. For example, in the algebraC,TB(C) andTU=UTbutUT=Uis not the lub of {U,T}. Ifxy, thenyx=xand hencexy=xyx=xx=x. Thereforexy if and only ifyx=x=xy.

2. TheC-algebraAx

Recall that for every Boolean algebraBandaBthe set (a]= {xB/xa}([a)= {x B/ax}) is a Boolean algebra under the induced operationsandwhere complemen- tation is defined byx=ax(x=ax).

In this section, we prove that ifAis aC-algebra andxA, thenAx= {sA/sx} is aC-algebra withT(=x) under the induced operations and thatAxis isomorphic to a quotient algebra ofA.

Theorem 2.1. LetAbe aC-algebra,xA, andAx= {sA/sx}. Then Ax,,,is aC-algebra withTwhereandare the operations inArestricted toAx,sis defined by xs, and “x” is the identity for.

Proof. ClearlyAx is closed underand. IfsAx, thenxs=x(xs)=(x x)s=xs=s. So thatsAx ands∗∗=(s)=(xs)=x(xs)=x (xs)=xs=s(sincesx).

Now, fors,tAx, (st)=x(st)=x(st)=(xs)(xt)=st. Finally, fors,t,uAx,

(st)u=x

(st)u=x

(su)(stu)

=

(xs)(xu)(xstu)

=(su)

stu.

(2.1)

The remaining identities hold inAxsince they hold inA.

Hence Ax,,,is aC-algebra with “x” as the identity for. Observe thatAxis itself aC-algebra but it is not a subalgebra ofAbecause the unary operationis not the restriction oftoAx. Now, we give some properties ofAx.

Theorem 2.2. LetAbe aC-algebra. Then the following hold:

(i)Ax= {xs/sA};

(ii)Ax=Ayif and only ifx=y;

(iii)AxAyAxy; (iv)AxAx=Axx;

(v) (Ax)xy=Axy.

(4)

Proof. (i), (ii), and (iii) can be verified routinely. We prove (iv) as follows. LetsAxx, then (xx)s=s and hence xs=x(xxs)=xxs=s. Also we have xs=x(xxs)=s, sincexx=xx. Now we prove (v),

Ax

xy=

xyt/tAx by (i)

=

xyxs /sA

=

xys /sA=Axy.

(2.2)

LetA1,A2be twoC-algebras withT1andT2. Then a mapping f :A1A2that pre- serves,,and carriesT1toT2is called aT-preservingC-algebra homomorphism. In future, we deal withC-algebras withT only and hence by aC-algebra homomorphism we mean aT-preservingC-algebra homomorphism. The following lemma can be verified routinely.

Lemma 2.3. Let f :A1A2be aC-algebra homomorphism whereA1,A2 areC-algebras withT1andT2. Then

(i) ifA1has the uncertain elementU, then f (U) is the uncertain element ofA2; (ii) ifaB(A1), then f(a)B(A2). The converse holds if f is one-one.

Now we prove the following.

Theorem 2.4. Let A be a C-algebra withT and xA, then the mappingαx:AAx

defined byαx(s)=xsfor allsAis a homomorphism ofAontoAxwith kernelθxand henceA/θx=Ax.

Proof. ForsA,xsxand hencexsAx. Lets,tA, then αx(st)=xst=xsxt=αx(s)αx(t),

αx(s)=xs=x(xs) by (ii) in the preliminaries

=x(xs)=(xs)= αx(s).

(2.3)

Clearly,αx(st)=αx(s)αx(t) andαx(T)=a. Henceαxis aC-algebra homomorphism.

Now, forsAx, we haveαx(s)=s. Thereforeαx is onto homomorphism. Hence by the fundamental theorem of homomorphismA/Kerαx=Axand Kerαx= {(s,t)A×A/αx(s)

=αx(t)} = {(s,t)A×A/xs=xt} =θx. ThusA/θx=Ax. 3. Decompositions ofA

IfBis a Boolean algebra andaB, then we know thatBis isomorphic to (a]×[a). In this section we prove similar decompositions for aC-algebra. IfAis aC-algebra withT and aB(A), then we prove thatAis isomorphic toAaxAa and conversely. We also prove that ifa,bB(A) andab=F, thenAa is isomorphic toAb if and only if there is an automorphism onAthat carriesatob. First we prove the following.

(5)

Lemma 3.1. LetAbe aC-algebra withT,aB(A) andx,yA. Then

ax=ay, ax=ay⇐⇒x=y. (3.1)

Proof. LetaB(A) andx,yA. Assume thatax=ayandax=ay. Then x=Fx=(aa)x=(ax)(ax)

=(ay)(ay)=(aa)y=Fy=y. (3.2)

The converse is trivial

Note thatLemma 3.1fails ifa /B(A). For example, in theC-algebraC, we haveU / B(C),UT=UF=U, andUT=UF=U, butT=F.

Now we prove the following decomposition theorem.

Theorem 3.2. IfAis aC-algebra withTandaB(A), thenA=Aa×Aa. Proof. Defineα:AAa×Aaby

α(x)=

αa(x),αa(x) xA. (3.3)

Then, byTheorem 2.4,αis well defined andαis a homomorphism.

Now, α(x)=α(y)ax=ay and ax=ay. Hence x=y (by the dual ofLemma 3.1). Finally, we proveαis onto. Let (x,y)Aa×Aa. Thenxaandya. So thatax=xanday=y.

Thus,ax=aax=Fanday=aay=F.

Now,

xyA, α(xy)=

αa(xy),αa(xy)

=

a(xy),a(xy)

=

(ax)(ay), (ax)(ay)

=(xF,Fy)=(x,y).

(3.4)

Henceαis an isomorphism.

Now we prove the converse of the above theorem in the following sense.

Theorem 3.3. LetA,A1,A2beC-algebras withTsuch thatA=A1×A2. Then there exists an elementaB(A) such that

A1=Aa, A2=Aa. (3.5)

(6)

Proof. Letφ:AA1×A2be an isomorphism anda=φ1(T1,F2) (whenT1,T2denote the-identities ofA1,A2, resp.)

Now (T1,F2)B(A1)×B(A2)=B(A1×A2) and henceaB(A).

Define f :A1Aaby f(x1)=φ1(x1,F2) for allx1A1. Now

aφ1x1,F2

=φ1T1,F2

φ1x1,F2

=φ1x1,F2

(sinceφ1is a homomorphism). (3.6)

Thereforeφ1(x1,F2)Aa. Thus f is well defined.

It can be routinely verified that f preserves,and that f is one-one.

Now we prove that f preserves the unary operation. Letx1A1, then

fx1

=φ1x1,F2

=φ1T1x1,F2T2

=φ1T1,F2

φ1x1,T2 sinceφ1is homomorphism

=a

φ1x1,F2

=afx1

= fx1

.

(3.7)

Finally, we prove f is onto.

LetxAa. Thenφ(x)=(x1,x2) for somex1A1,x2A2. Now

x1,x2

=φ(x)=φ(ax)=φ(a)φ(x)

= T1,F2

x1,x2

= x1,F2

. (3.8)

Thusx2=F2and f(x1)=φ1(x1,F2)=φ1(x1,x2)=x.

Hence f is onto. ThusA1=Aa. SimilarlyA2=Aa. Finally, fora,bB(A) withab=F, we derive a necessary and sufficient condition forAato be isomorphic toAb. First we prove the following lemmas.

Lemma 3.4. IfAis aC-algebra withT,aB(A),xAa, andyAa, thenxy=yx. Proof. LetxAa,yAa. Thenxaandya. Henceay=F=ax. Now

a(xy)=(ax)(ay)=xF=x,

a(yx)=(ay)(ax)=Fx=x. (3.9)

(7)

Therefore,a(xy)=a(yx). Similarlya(xy)=a(yx).

By the dual ofLemma 3.1,

xy=yx. (3.10)

Lemma 3.5. LetAbe aC-algebra withT. Then, fora,bB(A),abB(Aa).

Proof. Clearlyaba. Now

(ab)(ab)=(ab)

a(ab)

=(ab)

a(ab)=(ab)(ab)

=a(bb)=aT=a.

(3.11)

Hence,abB(Aa).

Now, we prove the theorem.

Theorem 3.6. LetAbe aC-algebra withTanda,bB(A) such thatab=F. ThenAa

is isomorphic toAbif and only if there exists an isomorphismα:AAsuch thatα(a)=b. Proof. Leta,bB(A) withab=F. Letφ:AaAbbe an isomorphism.

Nowab=(ab)F=(ab)(ab)=(aa)b=b becauseB(A) is a Boolean algebra. So thatbAaandb=ab. Similarly,ba=a. Now by Theorems 2.2,3.2, andLemma 3.5, we have

(i)A= Aa×Aa=Aa×Aab×A(ab)=Aa×Ab×Aab

under the isomorphismxβ (ax,bx, (ab)x);

(ii)A=Ab×Ab=Ab×Aba×A(ba)=Ab×Aa×Aab

under the isomorphismxγ (bx,ax, (ab)x);

(iii)Aa×Ab×Aab=Ab×Aa×Aab

under the isomorphism (x,y,z)δ (φ(x),φ1(y),z).

Now defineα:AAbyα=γ1δβ. Thenαis an isomorphism ofAontoAand α(a)=

γ1δβ(a)=γ1δ(a,F,F) (sinceba=F=aa)

=γ1(b,F,F) sinceφ(a)=b,φ(F)=F

=b sinceγ(b)=(b,F,F).

(3.12)

Henceαis an isomorphism ofAsuch thatα(a)=b.

Conversely, suppose thatα:AAis an isomorphism such thatα(a)=b.

Letλbe the restriction ofαtoAa. Now we prove thatλis an isomorphism ofAaonto Ab. ForxAa,

bλ(x)=bα(x)=α(a)α(x)=α(ax)=α(x)=λ(x). (3.13)

(8)

So thatλ(x)Ab. Henceλis well defined. Clearlyλis a homomorphism and one-one.

LetxAb. Sinceαis onto, there existsyAsuch thatα(y)=x. NowayAa and λ(ay)=α(ay)=α(a)α(y)=bx=x(sincexb).

Henceλis an isomorphism ofAaontoAb.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor U. M. Swamy for his support and guidance in the prepara- tion of this paper. The second author gratefully acknowledges University Grants Com- mission for their financial support in the form of UGC-JRF. We thank referees for their helpful suggestions.

References

[1] F. Guzm´an and C. C. Squier, The algebra of conditional logic, Algebra Universalis 27 (1990), no. 1, 88–110.

[2] G. C. Rao and P. Sundarayya,C-algebra as a poset, International Journal of Mathematical Sci- ences, 4 (2005), no. 2, 225–236.

[3] U. M. Swamy, G. C. Rao, and R. V. G. Ravi Kumar, Centre of aC-algebra, Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics 27 (2003), no. 2, 357–368.

G. C. Rao: Department of Mathematics, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India E-mail address:[email protected]

P. Sundarayya: Department of Mathematics, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India E-mail address:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Abstract: In this paper we prove a regularity result for very weak solutions of equations of the type −divA(x, u, Du) = B(x, u, Du), where A, B grow in the gradient like t p−1 and

A class of finite ordered structures is a Ramsey class if given structures A, B in the class, and a positive integer t, there is another structure C in the class such that for

In this note we show for each rational number a/b within this interval the class K a/b of K 4 -minor-free graphs with circular chromatic number a/b is universal if and only if a/b 6=

One can show that if C e is a small deformation of a coassociative 4–fold C of type (a) or (b) then C e is also of type (a) or (b) and thus, Theorem 1.1 implies analogous results on

Let (b n ) = (b 1 , b 2 ,. ) be a sequence of integers. We consider primitive prime divisors of zero orbits of polynomials. If the orbit contains only finitely many values, then α is

If M B(H) (the algebra of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space H) and ,B are ,-automorphlsms satisfying equation (i.i) then Watatani .5] proved that and B commute.. The

Also, it is shown that a bilateral Q-F -algebra (not necessarily locally convex) is a regular von Neumann algebra if and only if it is isomorphic algebraically and topologically to

Under certain conditions we can determine the Bourgain algebra and the minimal envelope algebras of maximal subalgebras of a Douglas algebra B (here B will have a maximal