• 検索結果がありません。

ON THE OPERATOR EQUATION CI’ + l ’’1 =/’ +/-1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "ON THE OPERATOR EQUATION CI’ + l ’’1 =/’ +/-1"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci.

Vol. 9 No. 4 (1986) 767-770

ON THE OPERATOR EQUATION CI’ + l ’’1 =/’ +/-1

767

A.B. THAHEEM

Department of Mathematics

Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad

,PAKISTAN

(Received May 25, 1985 and in revised form July I, 1986)

ABSTRACT. Let

,B

be ,-automorphisms of a von Neumann algebra M satisfying the operator equation

+-I B+ -l.

In this paper we use new techniques (which are useful in non- commutative situations as well) to provide alternate proofs of the results:- If

,

commute then there is a central projection p in M such that on PEP and

-I

on

(I-P) If M=

B(H),

the algebra of all bounded operators on a Hilbert space H, then

= B

or

= -l.

KEY

WORDS AND PHRASES. Automorphisms, central projection, Hilbert-Schmidt operators.

1980 AMS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODE. Primary 46LI0; Secondary 47C15.

i. INTRODUCTION.

Suppose that and are ,-automorphisms of avon Neumann algebra M satisfying the operator equation

+ B + B

(I.i)

In recent years a lot of rk has been done on this operator equation. It has played an important role in the decomposition of a yon Neumann algebra

([I]

and

L2]

), in the

geometric interpretation of the Tomita-Takesaki theory

[3]

and its generalization to Jordan algebras

[4].

For more details concerning this equation, we refer to

[i]

and

[2].

It has been shown in

[’.i]

that if and

B

are commuting ,-automorphisms of a

on

Neumann algebra M satisfying equation (i.i) then there exists a central projection p in M such that

B

on

Mp

and

B

-I on M(I-p). If M

B(H) (the

algebra of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space

H)

and

,B

are ,-automorphlsms satisfying equation (i.i) then Watatani

.5]

proved that and

B

commute. The above result of

[i]

can now be

applied and we get either

B

or

B

-I because the center of

B(H)

consists of scalar multiples of the identity operator only. So in the case of

B(H),

the additional assump- tion of commutativity of and

B

can be dropped to get the decomposition of M

B(H).

The aim of this paper is to provide new -proofs of these results. The proofs are relatively simple and the techniques used here can be of independent interest as well.

Moreover,

the arguments used here can be carried over to obtain results in certain non- commuting situations

(see,

for instance

[6]).

(2)

768 A.B.

THAHEEM

2. MAIN RESULTS.

We first prove the following.

PROPOSITION 2.1

(.i]).

Let M be a von Neumann algebra and a,8 be commuting ,-automor- phisms satisfying

a+-i

8+8-I Then there exists a central projection p in M such that (i)

(aS)

(p) p, (ii) a= 8 on

Mp

and (iii) a 8-I on M(l-p).

PROOF. Since a and 8 commute, therefore

(-8)(a8-i) (a-8)(l-8-1a-l)a8 (a- 8-B-l+a-l)a

8 0.

This implies that

R(a8-1) _ N(a-8)

where

R(aB-l)

and

N(a-8)

respectively denote the range space and null space of the operators under consideration. Now

R(aB-l) +

N(aB-l) is o-weakly dense in M and the subalgebra generated by

R(8-1)

is a two-sided ideal in M

(1:7),

therefore there exists a central projection p in M such that

(8)(p) p and Mp is the smallest closed ,-algebra containing R(aB-l). But

R(aB-l)

___ N(a-8)

and

N(a-8)

is a subalgebra. Therefore Mp

N(a-8).

Hence (i) and (ii) are proved. To show (iii), we note that

R(a8-1) + N(8-1)

is dense in M and if we apply

(l-p)

to

R(aB-l) + N(aB-l),

we get

(l-p)M c (l-p)N(aB-l)

N(aB-l).

This shows that 8-1 on (i-p)M and the proof of the result is complete.

In fact, one can improve the above proposition and hence the decomposition theorem of

[i

and show that there is a central projection

Pl

which gives the decompo-

sition of M as in (ii) and (iii) and also and 8 leave

Pl

invariant

(that

is

a(pl

8(p

I) pl ).

But this requires an argument.

LEMMA

2.1. Let and 8 be automorphisms of a yon Neumann algebra M satisfying +a-I 8+ 8

-1.

Then

N(a-B)

is invariant under a and 8.

PROOF. Note that

(a-8)

8-1 _-i

8-1(a_8)a-i

or

8(a-8) (-8).

So if

(a-8) (x)

0 then

(a-8){a(x))

0 for all

xeM.

Likewise

(a-8)(8(x))

0 for all

xeM.

Now if p is as in the above proposition, then (p) 8(p) because of (il) and

(eB)(p)

p. It follows that

2(p)

p and

82(p)

p.

Put

Pl e(P)

V p. Then

(Pl PI" Moreover,

by the lemma, we have a 8 on Mp. So a 8 on

Ma(p)

and hence

8 on

MPl.

As

(l-Pl) <__ (l-p),

we get e8 1 on

MPl.

Since

a(pl) PI’

we get that 8(p

I) + 8-1(pl 2Pl.

This shows that

8(pl) Pl (I.’71)" so

we obtain the following:

THEOREM 2.1. Let M be a yon

Neumann

algebra and a,8 be ,-automorphisms satisfying a

+

a-I 8

+

8-I Then there exists a central projection

Pl

in M such that

(i)

a(pl) 8(pl Pl

(ii) a 8 on Mp

I

(iii) a 8-I on

M(l-Pl ).

Remark that the above result is more important in the case of a factor in which a 8 or a 8

-l.

Watatani

[5]

showed that if a and 8 are ,-automorphisms of M=

B(H)

then a and 8 commute.

By

Theorem 2.1 we get that either a 8 or a 8

-1. However,

we provide here an independent and direct proof of this result using Hilbert-Schmidt operator etc.

which may be of an independent interest.

THEOREM 2.2. Let a and 8 be ,-automorphisms on

B(H)

such that a

+

a-1

B +

8

-l.

Then either a 8 or a 8-1

(3)

OPERATOR EQUATION 769 PROOF. We know that e and

B

are inner on

B(H).

So there are unitaries u and v such that

(x)

u xu*

S(x)

vxv*

for all x in

B(H).

Thus

uxu*+u*xu vxv*+v*xv.

We can write the above equation in terms of Hilber-Schmidt operators on H @ H as u@u+u*@u

*=

v@v+v@v

Assume that u*

#

%u for any complex number (and similarly for

v).

Choose w in

B(H),

such that

w(v) I

and

w(v*)

0. Applying

(l@w)

we get

(g)u + (Su*

v.

So there exist numbers k

I

and k2 such that v

klu + k2u*

v*

i

u*

+ 2

u

And hence

uS+u*8 *= (Ik112 + Ik212)u + (kl

2

+ 2kl)UJ *

+ (ik2 + k2l)U* + (Ik112 + Ik212)u* *.

Since u and u* are linearly independent, it follows that

kl

2 0 and

Ikl12+ Ik212

i.

If k

I

0 then

lea1

i and if k2 0 then

fell

i. In the first case v

kmu*

and

hence

B-l(x)

v*xv

2uxk2u* Ik212uxu * (x)

for all

xB(H).

In the second case v

klU

and by similar calculations we have

(x) 8(x)

for all x in

B(H).

Similarly when u* lu for a complex number %, with

II

i, we get

2(u@) v@+v**

Again choosing w in

B(H),

with

w(v)

i and w(v*) O, we have

2w(u)u

v. This is

possible only when

12()I

i and this implies that e 8.

A similar procedure as in the above paragraphs shows that in any case either e 8 or e

B

-I and the proof is complete.

COROLLARY 2.1. Let e and be two inner ,-automorphisms on a factor M acting on a Hilbert space H such that e

+

e -I 8

+ -i.

Then either e or e 8-I

PROOF. Let u and v be, unitaries in M such that

e(x)

uxu*

8(x)

v xv*

for all xeM.

Define

&

and on

B(H)

by the same formulae. Choose an element x in the algebra genera- ted by M and M. Then

n

X

[ aid

i=l

with

a.e

M and

ae M’.

Apply

+ -i

on the algebra generated by M and

M"

and remark that

(a) a

and

-l(a’) a:

because u e M. We get

n n

( + E-I)(x)

i=l

. (ai)a +

i=l

I e-l(ai)a

[ ( +

s

-l) (ai)a

x

i=l

(4)

770 A.B. THAHEEM

Since a

+ a-i B + B-I

then

+ -l + -I

on the algebra L generated by M and M

.

Since M is a factor then L is dense in

B(H)

and by continuity

+ -i + -l

on

B(H).

By the theorem above we get either or

E -i

and hence a

B

or

-i.

This

proves the result.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. We wish to express our sincere thanks to Professor A.Van Daele for many useful suggestions which enabled me to complete this research.

i.

REFERENCES

THAHEEM,

A.B. On a Decomposition of a von Neumann Algebra,

Ren.

Sem. Mat. Univ.

Padova 65 (1981), 1-7.

2.

THAHEEM,

A.B.,

DAELE A.VAN.

and VANHEESWIJCK, L.

A

Result on Two One-parameter

Groups

of.Automorphisms, Math. Scand. 51

(1982),

261-274.

3.

HAAGERUP,

U. and SKAU, F. Geometric

Aspects

of the Tomita-Takesaki Theory II, Math. Scand. 48

(1981),

241-252.

4.

5.

HAAGERUP,

U. and

OLSEN,

H. Tomita-Takesaki Theory for Jordan

Algebras,

J.

Operator

Theory ii

(1984),

343-364.

WATATANI,

Y. On Commuting Automorphisms,

Amer.

Math. Monthly

(1981), 449.

THAHEEM,

A.B. On Pairs of Automorphisms of yon Neumann Algebras, (preprint).

THAHEEM,

A.B. Decomposition of a von Neumann Algebra Relative to a ,-Automorphism,

Proc.

Edinburgh Math. Soc.

22/1 (1979),

9-10.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Alexander [1] proved (among others) that if {f n } is a sequence of holomorphic functions on the unit ball B such that the restriction of {f n } to each complex line L through

The inequality (1.2) implies that the functional kwk H 1 (B) can be taken as an equivalent norm in H. The dual space of H. the set of all continuous linear functionals on H..

In this article, we prove the existence of solutions of a quadratic integral equation of Fredholm type with a modified argument, in the space of functions satisfying a H¨

ˇ Semrl, Linear maps preserving semi-Fredholm operators and generalized invertibility, Linear Multilinear Algebra 57 (2009),

We give the concrete forms of surjec- tive linear maps φ : B (H) → B (H) preserving quasi-unitary operators and using this result for giving a form of φ when it preserves operator

If, moreover, a and b are coprime and c is suffi- ciently large compared with a and b, then (1) has at most one solution. Diophantine equations, applications of linear forms in

Then, infinite propagation speed for the shallow water equations is proved in the following sense: the corresponding solution u(t, x) with compactly supported initial datum u 0 (x)

Switching from A to A −1 and/or from B to B −1 if necessary, we may with- out loss of generality suppose that the first α and β remaining after the cancellation procedure are