• 検索結果がありません。

#A38 INTEGERS 9 (2009), 491-496 A SHORT PROOF OF A SERIES EVALUATION IN TERMS OF HARMONIC NUMBERS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "#A38 INTEGERS 9 (2009), 491-496 A SHORT PROOF OF A SERIES EVALUATION IN TERMS OF HARMONIC NUMBERS"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

A SHORT PROOF OF A SERIES EVALUATION IN TERMS OF HARMONIC NUMBERS1

Alois Panholzer

Institut f¨ur Diskrete Mathematik und Geometrie, Technische Universit¨at Wien, 1040 Wien, Austria

[email protected] Helmut Prodinger

Department of Mathematics, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa [email protected]

Received: 5/21/08, Revised: 2/12/09, Accepted: 3/14/09, Published: 9/30/09

Abstract We give another short and simple proof of

!

n≥1

1 22n−1(2n1)

!

k

"2n1 k

# 1

k−j−n+12 =2 j

!j

k=1

1 2k1.

1. The Main Result

For positive integersj, consider S(j) =!

n≥1

1 22n−1(2n1)

!

k

"2n1 k

# 1

k−j−n+12.

This quantity arose in [4] and was subsequently evaluated in [3]. Further proofs of the final formula

S(j) =−2 j

!j

k=1

1 2k1

were given in [2, 1]. Here, we give another short and simple proof.

For our analysis, it is better to consider T(j) =!

n≥1

1 22n−1(2n1)

!

k

"2n1 k

# 1

k+j−n+12,

1This work was supported by the South African Science Foundation NRF, grant 2053748, and by the Austrian Science Foundation FWF, grant S9608-N23.

(2)

so that

S(j) =!

n≥1

1 22n1(2n1)

!

k

" 2n1 2n1−k

# 1

k−j−n+12

=!

n≥1

1 22n−1(2n1)

!

k

"2n1 k

# 1

(2n1−k)−j−n+12

=!

n≥1

1 22n−1(2n1)

!

k

"2n1 k

# 1

n−k−j−12

=−T(j).

It will be advantageous to treat the sum T$j :=!

n≥1

1 22n−1(2n1)

%1 2

2n−1!

k=0

"2n1 k

# 1

k+j−n+12

1 2

2n−1!

k=0

"2n1 k

# 1

k−j−n+12

&

=1 2

'T(j)−S(j)(=T(j).

First we will give a representation of the sum)2n−1 k=0

'2n−1

k

( 1

k+m+12,withm∈Z, as a curve integral in the complex plane.

Lemma 1 We have

2n−1!

k=0

"2n1 k

# 1

k+m+12 =*

Γ

u2m(1 +u2)2n−1du,

where the curveΓ is the upper half of the unit circle in the complex plane starting from 1and ending at1, i.e.,Γ={cos(π−t) +isin(π−t) :t∈[0,π]}.

Proof. We have

*

Γ

u2m(1 +u2)2n−1du=*

Γ 2n−1!

k=0

"2n1 k

#

u2k+2mdu

=2n−1!

k=0

"2n1 k

# u2k+2m+1 2k+ 2m+ 1

++ ++

1

−1

= 2

2n−1!

k=0

"2n1 k

# 1

2k+ 2m+ 1.

!

(3)

Thus we get 1 2

2n−1!

k=0

"2n1 k

# 1

k+j−n+12 1 2

2n−1!

k=0

"2n1 k

# 1

k−j−n+12

=1 2

*

Γ

'u2j−2n−u−2j−2n(

(1 +u2)2n−1du

=1 2

*

Γ

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 u

-2n−1

du, and further

T$(j) =!

n≥1

1 22n−1(2n1)

1 2

*

Γ

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 u

-2n−1

du

=!

n≥1

*

Γ

1 2(2n1)

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 2u

-2n−1

du. (1)

Next we consider, forj∈Nandu∈Γ, the series

Qj(u) :=!

n≥1

1 2(2n1)

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 2u

-2n−1

.

Lemma 2 The seriesQ$j(ϕ) :=Qj(e)converges uniformly for ϕ∈[0,π], i.e.,

Q$j(ϕ) =ie−iϕsin(2jϕ)1

2log1 + cosϕ

1cosϕ. (2)

Proof. Substitutingu=e, withϕ∈[0,π], we can write Q$j(ϕ) =Qj(e) =ie−iϕ!

n≥1

1 2n1

e2jiϕ−e−2jiϕ 2i

,e+e−iϕ 2

-2n−1

=ie−iϕ!

n≥1

1

2n1sin(2jϕ)(cosϕ)2n−1. Since we have

!

n≥1

z2n−1 2n1 =1

2log1 +z

1−z, for |z|<1, (3) we obtain the pointwise convergence of the series Q$j(ϕ), for ϕ (0,π), to the function given in (2).

Obviously we also have Q$j(0) =Q$j(π) = 0, which shows convergence ofQ$j(ϕ), for all ϕ [0,π]. Since (3) converges uniformly for all z, with |z| q < 1,

(4)

we obtain immediately that Q$j(ϕ) converges uniformly for all ϕ [δ,π−δ], for arbitrary 0<δ<π2. But since for allj∈N

ϕ→0limsin(2jϕ) log1 + cosϕ 1cosϕ = 0,

which can easily be shown, we obtain that for all$>0 there exists aδ >0, such that

++

+ie−iϕ !

n≥N

1

2n1sin(2jϕ)(cosϕ)2n−1+++= !

n≥N

1

2n1sin(2jϕ)(cosϕ)2n−1

!

n≥1

1

2n1sin(2jϕ)(cosϕ)2n−1<$,

for all 0 ϕ < δ and for all N N. This, together with the obvious relation Q$j−ϕ) = −Q$j(ϕ), shows that Q$j(ϕ) converges even uniformly for all ϕ

[0,π]. !

After back-substitution, we obtain that the seriesQj(u) converges uniformly for allu∈Γto the function

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1

4log,1 +1+u2u2 11+u2u2

-.

Thus in equation (1) we can interchange summation and integration and obtain the integral representation

T$j =*

Γ

!

n≥1

1 2(2n1)

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 2u

-2n−1

du

=1 2

*

Γ

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1

2log,1 +1+u2u2 11+u2u2

-du

=1 2

*

Γ

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1 2log,

(1 +u)2 (1−u)2

-du. (4)

Remark Using the substitutionu=e one obtains the following representation of the sumT$j as a real integral:

T$j= 1 2

* π 0

sin(2jϕ) log1 + cosϕ 1cosϕdϕ, but it seems more involved to evaluate this integral.

We use now that, foru∈Γ:

1 2log,

(1 +u)2 (1−u)2

-= log,

(−i)1 +u 1−u

-,

(5)

and the correct determination of the (multi-valued) logarithm function is obtained when considering the real analogue of this equation:

1

2log1 + cosϕ

1cosϕ= logcosϕ2

sinϕ2, for ϕ∈(0,π).

Then equation (4) gives T$j =1

2

*

Γ

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(log,

(−i)1 +u 1−u

-du

=log(−i) 2

*

Γ

'u2j−1−u−2j−1( du+*

Γ

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1

2log,1 +u 1−u

-du

=*

Γ

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1

2log,1 +u 1−u

-du, (5)

since obviously the first integral vanishes.

In order to proceed we consider, forj∈Nandu∈Γ, the series Rj(u) :=!

n≥1

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(u2n−1 2n1.

Lemma 3 There is uniform convergence of the series Rj(u), for u Γ, to the function

fj(u) ='

u2j−1−u−2j−1(1

2log,1 +u 1−u

-. (6)

Proof. It is well-known that equation (3) even holds, with the exception of z = 1 andz =1, for all complexz with|z|= 1, which proves pointwise convergence of Rj(u) tofj(u) foru∈Γ\ {−1,1}.

Obviously we also haveRj(1) =Rj(1) = 0, which shows convergence ofRj(u), for allu∈Γ. Furthermore, since

Rj(u) =

!j

m=−j+1

u2m−2

2(m+j)−1+ !

m≥j+1

4j

(2(m−j)−1)(2(m+j)−1)u2m−2, as can be shown easily, we obtain by simple majorization arguments that Rj(u) converges even uniformly for allu∈Γto the functionfj(u). ! Thus in equation (5) we can replace fj(u) by the seriesRj(u) and interchange summation and integration and get

T$j=!

n≥1

*

Γ

'u2j−1−u−2j−1(u2n−1 2n1du,

(6)

which can be evaluated easily:

T$j=!

n≥1

*

Γ

,u2n+2j−2

2n1 −u2n−2j−2 2n1

-du

=!

n≥1

, u2n+2j−1

(2n1)(2n+ 2j1) u2n−2j−1 (2n1)(2n2j1)

-++++

1

−1

= 2!

n≥1

, 1

(2n1)(2n+ 2j1) 1

(2n1)(2n2j1) -

= 1 j

!

n≥1

, 1

2n1 1 2n+ 2j1

-1 j

!

n≥1

, 1

2n2j1 1 2n1

-

= 1 j

!j

k=1

1 2k11

j

!j

k=1

1 2k1= 2

j

!j

k=1

1 2k1.

AcknowledgmentOne referee’s patience with various versions of this material is gratefully acknowledged.

References

[1] W. Chu and L. De Donno. Transformation on infinite double series and applications to harmonic number identities. Appl. Algebra Engrg. Comm. Comput., 15:339–348, 2005.

[2] C. Krattenthaler. Hypergeometric proof of a curious identity of Lyons, Paule and Riese.South East Asian J. Math. Math. Sci., 3:63–67, 2004.

[3] R. Lyons, P. Paule, and A. Riese. A computer proof of a series evaluation in terms of harmonic numbers. Appl. Algebra Engrg. Comm. Comput., 13:327–333, 2002.

[4] R. Lyons and J. E. Steif. Stationary determinantal processes: phase multiplicity, Bernoullicity, entropy, and domination. Duke Math. J., 120:515–575, 2003.

参照

関連したドキュメント

In this expository paper, we illustrate two explicit methods which lead to special L-values of certain modular forms admitting complex multiplication (CM), motivated in part

iii) [3, Proposition 6.3] also treats the case where the percolation parameter p is differ- ent from p c. Our results extend to this case in an analogous way as in [3]. Further-

Hence in this paper, we are only interested in the non-compact case, on the condition that the Ricci curvature is positive and the scalar curvature approaches 0 towards infinity,

In [9], it was shown that under diffusive scaling, the random set of coalescing random walk paths with one walker starting from every point on the space-time lattice Z × Z converges

In this note we present a short proof of the following result, which is a slight extension of a nice 2005 theorem by Kano and Yu.. Let e be an edge of an r- regular

This paper deals with the fimitng behavior of a harmonic oscillator under the external random disturbance that is a process of the white noise type.. Influence of noises is

Replacing the closed manifolds with finitely dominated Poincar´e spaces and the fiber bundle with a fibration yields the notion of Poincar´e submersion: this is a map between

We introduce a series of invariants on K¨ ahler manifolds and prove a series of general inequalities involving these invariants for K¨ ahler submanifolds in complex space forms..