A SHORT PROOF OF A SERIES EVALUATION IN TERMS OF HARMONIC NUMBERS1
Alois Panholzer
Institut f¨ur Diskrete Mathematik und Geometrie, Technische Universit¨at Wien, 1040 Wien, Austria
[email protected] Helmut Prodinger
Department of Mathematics, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa [email protected]
Received: 5/21/08, Revised: 2/12/09, Accepted: 3/14/09, Published: 9/30/09
Abstract We give another short and simple proof of
!
n≥1
1 22n−1(2n−1)
!
k
"2n−1 k
# 1
k−j−n+12 =−2 j
!j
k=1
1 2k−1.
1. The Main Result
For positive integersj, consider S(j) =!
n≥1
1 22n−1(2n−1)
!
k
"2n−1 k
# 1
k−j−n+12.
This quantity arose in [4] and was subsequently evaluated in [3]. Further proofs of the final formula
S(j) =−2 j
!j
k=1
1 2k−1
were given in [2, 1]. Here, we give another short and simple proof.
For our analysis, it is better to consider T(j) =!
n≥1
1 22n−1(2n−1)
!
k
"2n−1 k
# 1
k+j−n+12,
1This work was supported by the South African Science Foundation NRF, grant 2053748, and by the Austrian Science Foundation FWF, grant S9608-N23.
so that
S(j) =!
n≥1
1 22n−1(2n−1)
!
k
" 2n−1 2n−1−k
# 1
k−j−n+12
=!
n≥1
1 22n−1(2n−1)
!
k
"2n−1 k
# 1
(2n−1−k)−j−n+12
=!
n≥1
1 22n−1(2n−1)
!
k
"2n−1 k
# 1
n−k−j−12
=−T(j).
It will be advantageous to treat the sum T$j :=!
n≥1
1 22n−1(2n−1)
%1 2
2n−1!
k=0
"2n−1 k
# 1
k+j−n+12
−1 2
2n−1!
k=0
"2n−1 k
# 1
k−j−n+12
&
=1 2
'T(j)−S(j)(=T(j).
First we will give a representation of the sum)2n−1 k=0
'2n−1
k
( 1
k+m+12,withm∈Z, as a curve integral in the complex plane.
Lemma 1 We have
2n−1!
k=0
"2n−1 k
# 1
k+m+12 =*
Γ
u2m(1 +u2)2n−1du,
where the curveΓ is the upper half of the unit circle in the complex plane starting from −1and ending at1, i.e.,Γ={cos(π−t) +isin(π−t) :t∈[0,π]}.
Proof. We have
*
Γ
u2m(1 +u2)2n−1du=*
Γ 2n−1!
k=0
"2n−1 k
#
u2k+2mdu
=2n−1!
k=0
"2n−1 k
# u2k+2m+1 2k+ 2m+ 1
++ ++
1
−1
= 2
2n−1!
k=0
"2n−1 k
# 1
2k+ 2m+ 1.
!
Thus we get 1 2
2n−1!
k=0
"2n−1 k
# 1
k+j−n+12 −1 2
2n−1!
k=0
"2n−1 k
# 1
k−j−n+12
=1 2
*
Γ
'u2j−2n−u−2j−2n(
(1 +u2)2n−1du
=1 2
*
Γ
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 u
-2n−1
du, and further
T$(j) =!
n≥1
1 22n−1(2n−1)
1 2
*
Γ
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 u
-2n−1
du
=!
n≥1
*
Γ
1 2(2n−1)
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 2u
-2n−1
du. (1)
Next we consider, forj∈Nandu∈Γ, the series
Qj(u) :=!
n≥1
1 2(2n−1)
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 2u
-2n−1
.
Lemma 2 The seriesQ$j(ϕ) :=Qj(eiϕ)converges uniformly for ϕ∈[0,π], i.e.,
Q$j(ϕ) =ie−iϕsin(2jϕ)1
2log1 + cosϕ
1−cosϕ. (2)
Proof. Substitutingu=eiϕ, withϕ∈[0,π], we can write Q$j(ϕ) =Qj(eiϕ) =ie−iϕ!
n≥1
1 2n−1
e2jiϕ−e−2jiϕ 2i
,eiϕ+e−iϕ 2
-2n−1
=ie−iϕ!
n≥1
1
2n−1sin(2jϕ)(cosϕ)2n−1. Since we have
!
n≥1
z2n−1 2n−1 =1
2log1 +z
1−z, for |z|<1, (3) we obtain the pointwise convergence of the series Q$j(ϕ), for ϕ ∈ (0,π), to the function given in (2).
Obviously we also have Q$j(0) =Q$j(π) = 0, which shows convergence ofQ$j(ϕ), for all ϕ ∈ [0,π]. Since (3) converges uniformly for all z, with |z| ≤ q < 1,
we obtain immediately that Q$j(ϕ) converges uniformly for all ϕ ∈ [δ,π−δ], for arbitrary 0<δ<π2. But since for allj∈N
ϕ→0limsin(2jϕ) log1 + cosϕ 1−cosϕ = 0,
which can easily be shown, we obtain that for all$>0 there exists aδ >0, such that
++
+ie−iϕ !
n≥N
1
2n−1sin(2jϕ)(cosϕ)2n−1+++= !
n≥N
1
2n−1sin(2jϕ)(cosϕ)2n−1
≤!
n≥1
1
2n−1sin(2jϕ)(cosϕ)2n−1<$,
for all 0 ≤ ϕ < δ and for all N ∈ N. This, together with the obvious relation Q$j(π−ϕ) = −Q$j(ϕ), shows that Q$j(ϕ) converges even uniformly for all ϕ ∈
[0,π]. !
After back-substitution, we obtain that the seriesQj(u) converges uniformly for allu∈Γto the function
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1
4log,1 +1+u2u2 1−1+u2u2
-.
Thus in equation (1) we can interchange summation and integration and obtain the integral representation
T$j =*
Γ
!
n≥1
1 2(2n−1)
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(,1 +u2 2u
-2n−1
du
=1 2
*
Γ
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1
2log,1 +1+u2u2 1−1+u2u2
-du
=1 2
*
Γ
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1 2log,
−(1 +u)2 (1−u)2
-du. (4)
Remark Using the substitutionu=eiϕ one obtains the following representation of the sumT$j as a real integral:
T$j= 1 2
* π 0
sin(2jϕ) log1 + cosϕ 1−cosϕdϕ, but it seems more involved to evaluate this integral.
We use now that, foru∈Γ:
1 2log,
−(1 +u)2 (1−u)2
-= log,
(−i)1 +u 1−u
-,
and the correct determination of the (multi-valued) logarithm function is obtained when considering the real analogue of this equation:
1
2log1 + cosϕ
1−cosϕ= logcosϕ2
sinϕ2, for ϕ∈(0,π).
Then equation (4) gives T$j =1
2
*
Γ
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(log,
(−i)1 +u 1−u
-du
=log(−i) 2
*
Γ
'u2j−1−u−2j−1( du+*
Γ
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1
2log,1 +u 1−u
-du
=*
Γ
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(1
2log,1 +u 1−u
-du, (5)
since obviously the first integral vanishes.
In order to proceed we consider, forj∈Nandu∈Γ, the series Rj(u) :=!
n≥1
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(u2n−1 2n−1.
Lemma 3 There is uniform convergence of the series Rj(u), for u ∈ Γ, to the function
fj(u) ='
u2j−1−u−2j−1(1
2log,1 +u 1−u
-. (6)
Proof. It is well-known that equation (3) even holds, with the exception of z = 1 andz =−1, for all complexz with|z|= 1, which proves pointwise convergence of Rj(u) tofj(u) foru∈Γ\ {−1,1}.
Obviously we also haveRj(−1) =Rj(1) = 0, which shows convergence ofRj(u), for allu∈Γ. Furthermore, since
Rj(u) =−
!j
m=−j+1
u2m−2
2(m+j)−1+ !
m≥j+1
4j
(2(m−j)−1)(2(m+j)−1)u2m−2, as can be shown easily, we obtain by simple majorization arguments that Rj(u) converges even uniformly for allu∈Γto the functionfj(u). ! Thus in equation (5) we can replace fj(u) by the seriesRj(u) and interchange summation and integration and get
T$j=!
n≥1
*
Γ
'u2j−1−u−2j−1(u2n−1 2n−1du,
which can be evaluated easily:
T$j=!
n≥1
*
Γ
,u2n+2j−2
2n−1 −u2n−2j−2 2n−1
-du
=!
n≥1
, u2n+2j−1
(2n−1)(2n+ 2j−1) − u2n−2j−1 (2n−1)(2n−2j−1)
-++++
1
−1
= 2!
n≥1
, 1
(2n−1)(2n+ 2j−1) − 1
(2n−1)(2n−2j−1) -
= 1 j
!
n≥1
, 1
2n−1− 1 2n+ 2j−1
-−1 j
!
n≥1
, 1
2n−2j−1− 1 2n−1
-
= 1 j
!j
k=1
1 2k−1−1
j
!j
k=1
−1 2k−1= 2
j
!j
k=1
1 2k−1.
AcknowledgmentOne referee’s patience with various versions of this material is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] W. Chu and L. De Donno. Transformation on infinite double series and applications to harmonic number identities. Appl. Algebra Engrg. Comm. Comput., 15:339–348, 2005.
[2] C. Krattenthaler. Hypergeometric proof of a curious identity of Lyons, Paule and Riese.South East Asian J. Math. Math. Sci., 3:63–67, 2004.
[3] R. Lyons, P. Paule, and A. Riese. A computer proof of a series evaluation in terms of harmonic numbers. Appl. Algebra Engrg. Comm. Comput., 13:327–333, 2002.
[4] R. Lyons and J. E. Steif. Stationary determinantal processes: phase multiplicity, Bernoullicity, entropy, and domination. Duke Math. J., 120:515–575, 2003.