• 検索結果がありません。

SEMIPOSITONE PROBLEM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "SEMIPOSITONE PROBLEM"

Copied!
5
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

SEMIPOSITONE PROBLEM

MAYA CHHETRI AND R. SHIVAJI

Received 30 September 2004 and in revised form 13 January 2005

We consider the boundary value problempu=λ f(u) inΩsatisfyingu=0 on∂Ω, whereu=0 on∂Ω,λ >0 is a parameter,Ωis a bounded domain inRnwithC2boundary

∂Ω, andpu:=div(|∇u|p2u) for p >1. Here, f : [0,r]R is aC1 nondecreasing function for some r >0 satisfying f(0)<0 (semipositone). We establish a range of λ for which the above problem has a positive solution when f satisfies certain additional conditions. We employ the method of subsuper solutions to obtain the result.

1. Introduction

Consider the boundary value problem

pu=λ f(u) inΩ, u >0 inΩ, u=0 on∂Ω,

(1.1)

whereλ >0 is a parameter,Ωis a bounded domain in Rn withC2 boundary ∂Ωand

pu:=div(|∇u|p2u) forp >1. We assume that f C1[0,r] is a nondecreasing func- tion for somer >0 such that f(0)<0 and there existβ(0,r) such that f(s)(sβ)0 fors[0,r]. To precisely state our theorem we first consider the eigenvalue problem

pv=λ|v|p2v inΩ,

v=0 on∂Ω. (1.2)

Let φ1C1(Ω) be the eigenfunction corresponding to the first eigenvalue λ1 of (1.2) such thatφ1>0 inΩandφ1=1. It can be shown that∂φ1/∂η <0 on∂Ωand hence, depending onΩ, there exist positive constantsm,δ,σsuch that

φ1pλ1φ1pm onΩδ,

φ1σ onΩ\δ, (1.3)

where Ωδ:= {x|d(x,∂Ω)δ}.

Copyright©2006 Hindawi Publishing Corporation Boundary Value Problems 2005:3 (2005) 323–327 DOI:10.1155/BVP.2005.323

(2)

p-Laplacian semipositone problems

We will also consider the unique solution,eC1(Ω), of the boundary value problem

pe=1 inΩ,

e=0 on∂Ω (1.4)

to discuss our result. It is known thate >0 inΩand∂e/∂η <0 on∂Ω. Now we state our theorem.

Theorem1.1. Assume that there exist positive constantsl1,l2(β,r]satisfying (a)l2kl1,

(b)|f(0)|λ1/m f(l1)<1, and (c)l2p1/ f(l2)> µ(l1p1/ f(l1)),

wherek=k(Ω)=λ11/(p1)(p/(p1))σ(p1)/ peandµ=µ(Ω)=(pe/(p1))p11/ σp). Then there existλ < λˆ such that (1.1) has a positive solution forλˆλλ.

Remark 1.2. A simple prototype example of a functionf satisfying the above conditions is

f(s)=r(s+ 1)1/22; 0sr41 (1.5) whenris large.

Indeed, by takingl1=r21 andl2=r41 we see that the conditionsβ(=3)< l1< l2

and (a) are easily satisfied forrlarge. Since f(0)= −r, we have f(0)λ1

m fl1

= λ1

m(r2). (1.6)

Therefore (b) will be satisfied forrlarge. Finally, l2p1/ f(12)

l1p1/ f(l1) =

r41p1(r2) r21p1r21

r4p3

r2p r2p3 (1.7) for largerand hence (c) is satisfied whenp >3/2.

Remark 1.3. Theorem 1.1holds no matter what the growth condition of f is, for large u. Namely, f could satisfy p-superlinear, p-sublinear or p-linear growth condition at infinity.

It is well documented in the literature that the study of positive solution is very chal- lenging in the semipostone case. See [5] where positive solution is obtained for largeλ when f is p-sublinear at infinity. In this paper, we are interested in the existence of a positive solution in a range ofλwithout assuming any condition on f at infinity.

We prove our result by using the method of subsuper solutions. A functionψis said to be a subsolution of (1.1) if it is inW1,p(Ω)C0(Ω) such thatψ0 on∂Ωand

|∇ψ|p2ψ· ∇w

λ f(ψ)w wW, (1.8)

(3)

whereW= {wC0(Ω)|w0 inΩ}(see [4]). A functionφW1,p(Ω)C0(Ω) is said to be a supersolution ifφ0 on∂Ωand satisfies

|∇φ|p2φ· ∇w

λ f(φ)w wW. (1.9)

It is known (see [2,3,4]) that if there is a subsolutionψand a supersolutionφof (1.1) such thatψφinΩthen (1.1) has aC1(Ω) solutionusuch thatψuφinΩ.

For the semipositone case, it has always been a challenge to find a nonnegative subso- lution. Here we employ a method similar to that developed in [5,6] to construct a positive subsolution. Namely, we decompose the domainΩby using the properties of eigenfunc- tion corresponding to the first eigenvalue ofpwith Dirichlet boundary conditions to construct a subsolution. We will proveTheorem 1.1inSection 2.

2. Proof ofTheorem 1.1

First we construct a positive subsolution of (1.1). For this, we letψ=l1σp/(1p)φ1p/(p1). Sinceψ=p/(p1)l1σp/(1p)φ11/(p1)φ1,

|∇ψ|p2ψ.w

= p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

φ1φ1p2φ1· ∇w

= p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

φ1|p2φ1

φ1wwφ1

= p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

φ1p2φ1.

φ1w p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

×

φ1pw

= p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

λ1φ1p2φ1

φ1w

p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

×

|∇φ1|pw by (1.2)

= p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

λ1φ1pφ1p

w wW.

(2.1) Thusψis a subsolution if

p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

λ1φ1pφ1p wλ

f(ψ)w. (2.2)

(4)

p-Laplacian semipositone problems OnΩδ

φ1pλφ1pm (2.3)

and therefore p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

λ1φ1pφ1p

≤ −m p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

λ f(ψ) (2.4) if

λλ˜:=mp/(p1)l1σp/(1p)p1

f(0) . (2.5)

OnΩ\δwe haveφ1σand therefore

ψ=l1σp/(1p)φ1p/(p1)l1σp/(1p)σp/(p1)=l1. (2.6) Thus

p

p1l1σp/(1p) p1

λ1φ1pφ1p

λ f(ψ) (2.7)

if

λλˆ:=λ1

p/(1p)l1σp/(1p)p1

fl1 . (2.8)

We get ˆλ <λ˜by using (b). Thereforeψis a subsolution for ˆλλλ.˜

Next we construct a supersolution. Letφ=l2/(e)e. Thenφis a supersolution if

φp2φ.w=

l2

e

p1

wλ

f(φ)w wW. (2.9) But f(φ) f(l2) and henceφis a super solution if

λλ:= l2p1

ep1fl2

. (2.10)

Recalling (c), we easily see that ˆλ < λ. Finally, using (2.1), (2.9) and the weak comparison principle [3], we see thatψφinΩwhen (a) is satisfied. Therefore (1.1) has a positive solution for ˆλλλwhereλ=min{λ,λ˜ }.

(5)

References

[1] M. Chhetri, D. D. Hai, and R. Shivaji,On positive solutions for classes ofp-Laplacian semipositone systems, Discrete Contin. Dynam. Systems9(2003), no. 4, 1063–1071.

[2] P. Dr´abek and J. Hern´andez,Existence and uniqueness of positive solutions for some quasilinear elliptic problems, Nonlinear Anal. Ser. A: Theory Methods44(2001), no. 2, 189–204.

[3] P. Dr´abek, P. Krejˇc´ı, and P. Tak´aˇc,Nonlinear Differential Equations, Chapman & Hall/CRC Re- search Notes in Mathematics, vol. 404, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida, 1999.

[4] Z. M. Guo and J. R. L. Webb,Large and small solutions of a class of quasilinear elliptic eigenvalue problems, J. Differential Equations180(2002), no. 1, 1–50.

[5] D. D. Hai and R. Shivaji,An existence result on positive solutions for a class ofp-Laplacian systems, Nonlinear Anal.56(2004), no. 7, 1007–1010.

[6] S. Oruganti and R. Shivaji,Existence results for classes ofp-Laplacian semipositone equations, submitted.

Maya Chhetri: Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC 27402, USA

E-mail address:[email protected]

R. Shivaji: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA

E-mail address:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Zeddini; On the existence of positive solutions for a class of semilinear elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal.. R˘ adulescu; Blow-up boundary solutions of semilinear elliptic

Yang; Existence and nonexistence of positive solutions of fourth order nonlinear boundary-value problems, Appl.. Yang; On a nonlinear boundary-value problem for fourth order

Shivaji, Multiple positive solutions for a class of semilinear elliptic boundary value problems, Nonlinear Anal.. Perera, Multiple positive solutions for a class of quasilinear

We establish sufficient conditions for the existence of multiple positive solutions to nonautonomous quasilinear elliptic equations with p(x)- Laplacian and sign-changing

The existence of positive solution for a class of nonlinear fractional differential equations are investigated by the method of upper and lower solutions and using Schauder and

Zhu; A priori estimates, existence and non-existence of positive solutions of generalized mean curvature equations, Nonlinear.. Deng, Existence of Multiple Solutions to

Liang, “The existence of nontrivial solutions to nonlinear elliptic equation of p-q- Laplacian type on R N ,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications, vol.

based on variational methods established the existence of an unbounded sequence of weak solutions for a class of differential equations with p(x)-Laplacian and subject to