失恋状況における認知的評価とコーピングが失恋後の心理的適応に及ぼす影響利用統計を見る

全文

(1)失恋状況における認知的評価とコーピングが失恋後の心理的適応に及ぼす影響著者名(日) 雑誌名巻号ページ発行年 URL. 加藤司東洋大学社会学部紀要 45 1 123-137 2007-12 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1060/00003041/. Creative Commons : 表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.ja.

(2)

(3) . !. ".

(4) E#ects of cognitive appraisal and coping with broken heart on psychological adjustment after break-up. ! " Tsukasa KATO. #$%&'() *+,-./01234-.56) 789:;<=>?@A) BCDEFG HIJKH@LM N1(; OHarvey & Hansen, ,*** ; P QR +323, +331 ; Kaczmarek & Backlund, +33+ST PQ O+331S U1V) <=>?WNXY Z[\]./) *^WW_à@b) *789VW/-G c) defg@hijk) lm 8nIoG) pqb(;T M1NMWN) *rs tuvtwxGyzuG/A{AN1T MU|G}b() 789.%&aU|G}~) G_) @|W;|o*) %&ῌ @{A|A-GD-.T *) ;|tuvtwxGyzu } @M-.T tuvt;( @2b(; Lazarus N OFolkman & Lazarus, +32*, +32/ ; Lazarus, +33-, +333 ; Lazarus & Folkman, +32., +321S tuvt

(5) -. T Lazarus N tuvt

(6) -*) rs tuvtwxGyzub2f*) yzu

(7) U'(G1) ) ftuvtH ^1(;T ) *I b(¡ 1) @¢b2£c¤¥G1(; OLazarus, +33-, +333ST bWb) }) G_) tuvt O¦§) S @b2¢*¨9 ©/. ! O,**/S Mearns O+33+S k-.T. Mearns O+33+S *34.ª«^ ++. ¬@}) OCoping Behaviors Inventory : Kirsch, Mearns & Catanzaro, +33*S) |®¯°) ±u²³Ga@´µ¶ U'(·¸b2T ) ¹º G O@»U|bG;Ga¼½S | 123.

(8) ./-+ ( ,**1 ).

(9)

(10) ,**/. !" #$%&. 'ῌ()'*+,-./0

(11) 1 -0 2*+" 34536789:;/<= ;!1 1 >?@1 A?B1 CDE1 FG+ 0 HI;/ J K LM +

(12) 1 >?@! NOPQ1 A?B1 CDE FG+! NRQ STUVWX7

(13) Y Z+1 1 OP!" [3453\/]^1 "

(14) _`*+R&a/+^K 1 R!" [3453\/bc^1 "

(15) _ `*+R&a/d^K e+*

(16) f1 g. h!i!>"j

(17) Jkl#$%m1 nKh!1 " o%p\

(18). Jkl *1 i!>"j

(19) Jkl

(20) q01 " [o%p \ 3453\/rsn[g. &\ 't/uMkl !vc Frazier. & Cook, +33- ; Smith & Cohen, +33- ; Sorensen, Russell, Harkness, & Harvey, +33- e (E w1 Smith & Cohen +33-. '/xy klh!1 "

(21) xJ\ Impact Event. Scale : Horowitz, Wilner, & Alvarez, +313 +1 "

(22) xJ )*z "

(23) _{|1 "

(24) xJ694}7~1 " t 1 g 3453\e/1 +v't/uM n1 " /h% )J e1 " /{| )J e1 "

(25) xJ R\ ,_ e. -S e1 g 3453\S1 . n (!c01 " 6789: >/LMklq_1 Lazarus +g. 3453. .*+1 "

(26) xJ )*zq_" 6789:3. 453\

(27) /JK hC klh!1 )*z/

(28) {|q_"/0 Lazarus +g. 3453. .h. !1 {|!1ῌ"

(29) 'J )1 "!Jh

(30) +*/0

(31) 'J )1 59 231 fT*z

(32) #4 )*zTh% Folkman, +32. ; Folkman & Lazarus, +32/ ; Lazarus & Folkman, +32. f1 i! >"j

(33) Jklh!1 " \ 1 {|%!" ¡E++v "

(34) _ ¢£¤¥-e.

(35) ¦5/%kl qm1 n+kl6

(36) !1 {|%. !"n[g. &\

(37) 7K /LM §Hῌ¨©ῌ8.

(38) ª +33+ ; Smith & Cohen, +33- e nZ1 {|q_"!" [g &\« ¬fh% ¡E+ " 6789:/

(39) !1 klh!x34536789:;

(40) ª ,***ª ,**-ª ,**1 /0

(41) ,***, ,**-, ,**1 x34536789:;!1 x>

(42) ¬ 3453®~¯°94

(43) xJ6789:±/JZ

(44) <=0h% 2 ;!²9x>/³$

(45) <=0h%1 n&\:´!²9x >hµ1 ¶·¸¹º»ax>

(46) ª ,**0 1 ¼½hx>

(47) ª ,**,b 124.

(48) q.

(49)

(50) . !. ". #$%#&'$#( )*+ ,-.,/0123-4$&51&67 89 :,-.,23-;<=>?7 94$@AB)#C8DE=>F5&'( )GHIJ87 COPE KCarver, Scheier, & Weintraub, +323L7 Ways of Coping Questionnaire KWCQ : Folkman & Lazarus, +32*, +32/, +322 ; Folkman, Lazarus, Dunkel-Schetter, DeLongis, & Gruen, +320L 1M7 >&N,-.,/0123-9 O:P)GHIJQRS'IT AB Kcoping scales with broad applicabilityL )# KUῌVWX +331 ; Mearns, +33+L7 YZ[)>$$\]S' IAB)^ K. !X ,**/L7 _ 1à b`cd

(51) =#&'$e. IfgAB)#1MF5&'( )GHIJ7 fgT AB)#hi7 9:à=8^C=e1#jk1l mnop'$ #1M7 mnq[rsS'$# K. !X ,***X ,**+X ,**.bX ,**1L( ;7 t. uvw`cd=87 xu wvyz w){ C1n7 9w4$cd|J&'$eI( 567 } K,***L ~à b tu w8 4I7 4I 1Ml op'$?7 K+33-L l %7 1n1I?7 '1n1I?4I 1Ml op'$#( C'&l 8)GH Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale KRadlo#, +311L7 ,-.,w)GH Hopkins Symptom Checklist KDerogatis, Lipman, Richels, Uhlenhuth, & Covi, +31. ; Derogatis, Richels, & Rock, +310L 1M7 ,-.,wr4$^B #l 4$#( cd=87 Cq94$mn` &'$?7 )'$eI( cd=#9:,.,AB%@7 )47 \]S'I%=>( C'& C&7 cd=87 )GHIJ7 9:,-.,AB)#( ),-.,/014$&57 9

(52) v `)4IcdJ$ &'$#IJ7 p¡7

(53) `4$#MC)cd (

(54) 7 >#8 `4$#1&7 ¢£¤¥)$C=e( ῌ )¦§ῌ¨=> ©M7 ª«#( tuvw ` Smith & Cohen K+33-L cdv7 ¬_)I®` Meuser & Marwit K+333῎,***L =87 ¦§ῌ¨=> ©M,-.,w#C &'$#C &7 ¯°¤¥]?( ῍ mnhi7 87 %8v7 Ià)±?. C=e. 1#C)²!4$?7 -³0jDE1=>F5&'( ;´ 7 C1 -³0jDE1=87 q)µ¶4· tu1"8,-.,w )¸¹S7 º7 q)»¼41"8,-.,w)½S7 #cd 1S'$# KCompas, Makarne, & Fondacaro, +322 ; Forsythe & Compas, +321 ; Masel, 125.

(55) ./-+ ( ,**1 ). Terry, & Gribble, +330

(56) . !"#$%. & '() *+,

(57) -./0'12 3 !"#$%"# . %) *+,

(58) -./'456%78% 9:;< =,**/

(59) >?@ AB!% CD9:<8 EFῌGHIJKLMNO "P ,

(60) -./ 0'Q %RS@78% >?5;RS@7TUV#. . . WXYZ[YHIJKL\ ]^'W$%HIJKL^!& R56% #_`$%Ta bc6%d +* W!efghi!T e5; >? -j klel! el;elW! a m!Tnopq elrs/tuv wv$%"#to!T xy-; hzbc!T el{|}qT+ ~I^ +0 ^ WXYZ[YHIJKL\ -. ^* ^W! W$%/! A- 68%/56% # 68 % 68 , 5u}q 68 !Tel;*

(61). T. ]^;!58T * WXYZ[YHIJKL\ -. ^! +**῍ el' 68% 3"!T ~I^; #- $-HIJKL\ 56% COPE, WCQ ^%l' !T@56% &8 K!TV' (!T =WCQ

(62) ^; 0 ' 68 3"!T. ,**, +* ) + T *d dW ¡ ¢+w"% fghi!T ,£3"l 012 #¤ bc fgl +1+ ¥¦ §@¨ bc'-©56PT-©ª ,0/ =«S 3/ ¬S +1* ./ +3.+2 ® 0¯ +2ῑ,- ® 1°2± +.-,

(63) 3²ª ,., =«S 3- ¬S +.3 ./ +3.*/ ® 0¯ +2ῑ,- ® 1° 2± *.31

(64) ³ /*1 UW!T.

(65) ¢+w;X4³-5´ $%µ- ^ C¶\ ·¸}T. ῌ ῍ ῎ ]\ !; ¹ºp5 §@¨PTbc{|}qT+ + "#78 V'!T¨3"»aT ῏ ῐ 5; §¼A½ ,y$ 126.

(66)

(67) . . . !" ῌ #$%&' () . *

(68) +,$-&(.) -&(.) /0-&(.. ) -&(.1234 5 67) -ῑ* 0!" ῌ. 892' : :;) <=1>?) @AB1=C!. :;8DE+ 2F=1GH6I&3!" <=1>?() J>? + K LMN5 67!A5) + KL( + KL 0&OP0) QR(=1ST. 5>? 67!" ῍. : U 0&VWῌXY 0!" Z' ( Lazarus 1. [\][9^_) àH0! b0!c) &Adefgh!i) b0! c) VW5- jC!i) b0!c) <2k l jC!i) b0!c) mI23. jC!i . ' 5-C!" n3oF,VWῌXn3 0!" ῎.

(69) : +,***p ,**-p ,**14 Uq[\][

(70) r3!" r(. stuvw8x

(71) ) yzuvw8x

(72) ) {|}~

(73) - BNr k 1=6I&3" stuvw8x

(74) ( ++0 ' 4 Uq8x5![ \][2 \U0&) J8x0) ,,38x. k !".

(75) #$5- +%) k &$ 0!) ',0 !4) 5( 8x(J

(76) #$5-) 1I" y zuvw8x

(77) ++* ' 4 (J,28x)ῌ*,2

(78) #$5 - +%) '023,0!) `0!4) 5(+ ,

(79) #$5-) 1I" {|}~

(80) +2 ' 4 ([\][ 2 \, 7) c?{|B,2

(81) #$5- +%) H_-7!) 023,0!4" .¡ ¢/¡( +,***p ,**-4 ,C&£ 6I&3 + p ,**.a ¤¥4" ῏. [\][0 : 18 ++33-4 2¦§[\][¨ rm) [\][0. r3!" r(©30 +/ ' +4B) 5ª) 64) ῌ30 +* ' +© 3«7) ¬_kA4) ®0 +* ' +8¯:°±39²) ®:;³4 ,C&G H6I&3 +18p +33-4" ´µ<¶R¡(·®5©30 a¸.3-) ῌ30 a¸.21) ®0 a¸.21 5-C!" ῐ. ¹=³ : º ῌ»¼ ++32-4 ,C&>?6I! Rusell, Peplau, & Cutrona ++32*4 2. UCLA ¹=³r½0!" r( ,* ' =12) ¢/¡ .¡£6I&3 +º ῌ»¼p +32-4" 2) ´µ<¶R¡( a¸.3, 5-C!". 127.

(82) ./-+

(83) ( ,**1 ). (. ).

(84) . . ! "#$% &'() *+,-./012 ,..2 *.02. *..2 345 + 6789:34;<=>&'? @ABCD2 /*.*3ῌ EFGH2 a.13 3 4I'? JK LMNOPNQRSTUV -. KL&W - XYZ&'. ! "#. $% promax [\ ]I'? ^-() ^_`_-2aZb_'Kcdefgh i& jk ,***l ,**- <mno()8pq_',? EFGH2rstuvwxQRSTU a .20 yztuvwxQRSTU a.13 X{|}5QRSTU a.2, 34I'? Table + 2H~ ~- QRSTU-, 34;? < QRSTU-H ;'K H <&' ,, -. . !&'-? ^-() F+,/*.,2.01l p.**+ rstuvwxQRSTU F+,/*./.-1l p.*/ KfW-$)8q_'? o f<&W -¡¢8-p£ rstuvwxQRSTU-¤¥¦8ef§<8¨q©KoI '? ' X{|}5QRSTUKfW+ªo«¬¥8q_' F+,/*.1.2+l p.*+? o KfW ®H¯5°H-¡¢8rstuvwxQRSTU-¤¥¦8ef§< 8¨q©KoI'?.

(85) Table , 2¯±QRSTU<²-³´µ¶Kw;· <-AD¸wx¹. Table +. Values. CA PRC NRC PC. Means and standard deviations for cognitive appraisal and coping behavior by sex and form of break-up DRD group. UL group. Sex. Form of break-up. Interaction F. Women (N3/). Men (N+1*). Women (N3-). Men (N+.3). F. F. 04-. -4.* +243. 14-0 04+/ .431 +-4*/4/3. /40* -4,* +14-1 34+, 04// .4.2 +*4*, 04... .4.0 ,42. +04,0 142, /41+ .4++ ++4/3 /4,.. .4., ,421 +04.* 34*/ 04++ /4./ ++4.2 /4-.. +42.. ,2401***. +4./. *42,. /4-1*. +4+3. *422. +4*1. *4*+. *4*+. 142+**. 34*3**. * p.*/ ** p.*+ *** p.**+ Note. Standard deviations are in parentheses. DRDdating relationship dissolution, ULunrequited love, CAcognitive appraisal (threat/loss), PRCpositive relationship-oriented coping, NRCnegative relationship-oriented coping, PCpostponed-solution coping.. 128.

(86)

(87)

(88) . )*+,-. /

(89) 0123

(90) 45. !"#. $. 678 +9: ;:. <=:

(91) : :

(92) >?@?ABCDEFG6H IJK: LMNOPQRS: TUV:

(93) WXYWZ6[\JK*+]^

(94) _P` ab6cd+./ Step + -e;: <=: Step , -e

(95) : Step - -e: Step . -eCDEFG6fg*+/ h:

(96) : : CDEFGeijkNOlmJ n*+k6Fo+ pAiken & West, +33+ 6qr*+s/ tuvwJKou: Step , -e.

(97) DF k: Step - -e DF kxy-.d+/ Step . -e: PQRS pDF p-,.31s(/.3,z p'.**+s ou{CDEFG DF kxy-.d+/ Table - ke: DF k xy-. Step |\lP`}K pbs: 01: _~}K pRs: DF k-. / PQRS*u:

(98) : }: }NOx yh|\lP`}K: NOxyh|\lP`}K{O?+/ +:.

(99) }CDEFGxy-.d+/ >-:

(100) + SD k6d+

(101) WXYWZ P`69+ /:

(102) oou{: }ePQRS*ux yh6)*u pb(.,2z p'.*+s: }o: PQR S oION¡?+ pFigure +s/ TUV*ue: ;NOxyh|\lP`}K: }NOxyh |\lP`}K{O?+: Step . DF kexy-ehNd+/

(103) WXYWZ>? @?¢£¤¥ou:

(104) : }NOxyh|\lP`}K {O?+: Step . DF kexy-ehNd+/ +: ¦§Zou{: }NOxyh|\lP`}K{O?+/. Table ,. Zeroth-order correlations between cognitive appraisal and coping behavior and psychological adjustment CA. CA PRC NRC PC. % 4-.*** 4,+*** 4,-a &4*2. Time. 4,-*** 4+-** 4+,** 4+,a &4+1***. Loneliness. 4*3* 4*0 4-+*** 4,3a &4+**. Psychological Distress Em. C/B. Ph. 4,.*** 4+3*** 4,1*** 4,1a &4*2. 4+3*** 4*3* 4--*** 4-,a &4*3*. 4+,** 4*1 4-+*** 4,3a &4*3*. * p'.*/ ** p'.*+ *** p'.**+ Note. a Zeroth-order correlations between psychological adjustment and NRC score after square root transformation. CA(cognitive appraisal (threat/loss), PRC( positive relationship-oriented coping, NRC(negative relationship-oriented coping, PC (postponed-solution coping. Time(a period of grieving, Em(emotional response, C/B(cognitive/behavioral response, Ph(physical response.. 129.

(105) j ./-+ ( ,**1 ? ). Table -. Predictors. Step + Sexa Formb Step , CA Step PRS NRS PC Step . CAPRC CANRC CAPC R (R,) DF. Standardized beta values for hierarchical multiple-regression analysis predicting subject well-being from sex, form of break-up, cognitive appraisal, and coping behavior. Time. 4*3 4*,. Loneliness. Psychological Distress. 4,.*** 4*3. Em. C/B. Ph. 4*4*1. 4*/ 4*2. 4*+ 4*-. 4++*. 4*/. 4+-* 4+-* 4,+***. 4*, 4,3*** 4*-. 4+,* 4,,*** 4*,. 4*+ 4-+*** 4*-. 4*4,2*** 4*0. . . . . 4*4,.* 4*2 4., 4+2*** /43,***. 4.+ 4+1*** +*4/2***. 4+0**. 4-/ 4+,*** +-42****. 4+.**. 4-2 4+.*** +/4+-***. 4+,*. 4-, 4+**** ++4/2***. * p.*/ ** p.*+ *** p.**+ Note. a +men, ,women, b +dating relationship dissolution group, ,unrequited love group. DRDdating relationship dissolution, ULunrequited love, CAcognitive appraisal(threat/loss), PRCpositive relationship-oriented strategies, NRCnegative relationship-oriented strategies, PC postponed-solution coping. Timea period of grieving, Ememotional response, C/Bcognitive/ behavioral response, Phphysical response.. h. i.

(106) .

(107) . !"#$%

(108) &'ῌ( ). *+,-.+/ 0123456789:;<=>?%@/ !")AB AC DEFG. 789:;<=>?%@/%HIJKLMN OP/Q !". RSTU.+VKLWXYUZ[A\]WX^LN _V àH.+bc de ^fg$Lhi.+/.+N !"K+

(109) jkLlL. A m. nKopL

(110) "56% qWX^Jr$J)*+N st +33- KXu

(111) "56)A v wxyHz*M. {|Lr }L~Lr%wIX+\]^+N opL

(112) "56%. q^!"M^

(113) A/$L}L08 $/^+N . /$

(114) "56 K }L~A

(115) "56f56)A$/)kL56)*. !"KM^

(116) AjkL&'ῌ( L+hIX+N _V !")A _$ 130.

(117) ῌ

(118) ῌ . !". #. $%&'()*+, ῌ -./0123 45'()62789, $:;, 4<=>?@A'B)C DE1FGHIJ KIHKLH, MNOPQ, RS1OTUV0, ῌ'B )%&ῌWPX V, 4<=>?@ A'B)CDE12PQ$1Y Z[LJ.

(119) \, ῌ]^,

(120) , ' _àbV2cd efghijkL H, \, ῌ]^'lmV2n

(121) , ῌ @oV0 Figure +.. Interaction e#ect of negative relationship-oriented coping and cognitive appraisal (threat/loss) on recovery from the break-up.. 1K`HL$p2J q, %&ῌW rst=>?@AQ, ῌ uV0st=>?vEV, w xyz)Q4<=>?vE. K`HL$p2J y{|2B[, ῌQX)}I2~PQX, ῌp0Qe$ PX ), B[$ῌ ^@oV01LKQXK PXJ LH1DL$I01n,

(122) r 1p2'X02Q70$1J Q, ῌ, X1Q, $@A1 [h10,

(123) r uV0e$ab$)[ K' ¡V210XFGHIJ .

(124) @APQ, ῌ¢£r¤@ Smith & Co-. hen ¥+33-¦ r, §'p2¨©@ Meuser & Marwit ¥+333ῌ,***¦ ª«LH, ῌ'%&ῌWPX ¬, ῌ ^®PX, ¯°V2J .

(125) Q|0 ±²³$´µ@' V, ῌ'%&ῌWPX ¬, ^®PX¶·¸HI, ¯_Q¹ºI2J VLV, u»Q¼D, ῌ'%&ῌWPX1[

(126) , ^½ D@oV01K' jkQ/HI$Lp2J

(127). ῌQ, \, ῌ]^,

(128) 'lmV2n, ῌ 131.

(129) ./-+ ( ,**1 ).

(130)

(131) . !"#

(132) $%&'(). *+,-./)01-!2 3

(133) $%&'(4565 *+,789

(134) :;<=>?:@A-B 9 *+,9CD

(135) ;< ?:. .?:!. .?:!9 *+,).

(136) EF GH

(137) 4565$%&'( *+, I-J KL. ..

(138) . 9 27<MN. /)8O!+P8QN

(139) RSTU. V7$%&'(9

(140) 4?:!+P-W5./<XY.-Z11"0[

(141) 2 \]7<^1_`?:. .a8Q. 4b

(142) RSTUV7$%&'(<. .cd

(143) ef10 <gh1i

(144) -?.j-W5`k./8

(145) <lmWi.

(146) n ef10

(147) o?p

(148) -9

(149) RSTUV7$%&'(q)rcd

(150) )gs

(151)

(152) )r

(153) :tu)05)4vw9xs

(154) -9y! I9 z05!12 RSTUV7$%&'(9

(155) {|-9 2\]8Q}:Z

(156) !tpJO<J!~b ?:. ./-?2

(157) <s1.

(158) 4tu

(159) RSTUV7$%&'(. -y! I)z05!12!IZK:. 1!)0

(160) RSTUV7 $%&'( *+, I9xZ8Q2 -ok. "!7# -. .89

(161) RSTUV7$%&'(-$. .K05.%& !B9

(162) . '#zs .

(163) (W5. )

(164) * +33, ;. ,***. +-oZ

(165) ῌ RSTUV7$%&'(-y!)z05oN

(166) RS TUV7$%&'(9

(167) *+,?NZ

(168)

(169) TUV!,X - I)K05.

(170) ./I)Q}:

(171) . TUV7$%&'(9

(172) f<@A-k?:. a8Q. -

(173) ;< . .. .?:!9

(174) 4 *+,)8Q.EF. 1

(175) +tu89

(176) TUV7$%&'(

(177)

(178)

(179) . -)z05 TUV7$%&'(9

(180) 0<!?:-

(181) f<C¡- !d¢1)£ oN

(182) f<kN

(183) ¤¥N. ./8

(184) @A-o¦7<§2Wi?:. .8Q. 1

(185) |¨-9

(186) 3©79 11"0[

(187) f<k?: y4. 8-#. #ª2+P-Z. .B«9

(188) 3©7

(189) Q.9

(190) f-\. .¬<. .89!®}:1 ¯°5±

(191) o?p

(192) 6²³L10

(193) ´µ7 +313 9

(194) 2\]. <@A-k?:. .B«8¶-9

(195) 2\]-\. ¸¹. /50<º». .¬

(196) ·9)z05.

(197). .¼%½9z05!)

(198) f-\ 132. .¬-?2

(199) .

(200)

(201) . . . !" "#$%&'( )*+,-./ 0( 1"2

(202) 34. 560789(

(203) 34 1:;8( <=> ?

(204) %"@

(205) ABC854

(206) DE

(207) FG&HI JKL( )*+,-./

(208) 2 MN( O<POQ RS

(209) T. .U&HK

(210) VFG&HI.

(211) .WD0( XYZῌ[\]^3_`( )*+,-./ "3ab( A&2 MNcd%eKI 8A8%&( O<POQR SD0( J54%.W0U&H%AeKI f( #$gh"iLKjD E94I kl( ( mn+,-./ ( )*+,-./ JHoHp0 q)*+,-r8l3s

(212) &A%eK( J0)*+,-. / tVu3VDEeKI .vwxD0%3( XyO<PO vwD0( mn+,-./ "#$8Kzy0( J{"|}8l3~A& kH( A& >ῌm<^d%( )*+,-./ "# $8Kzy0~A& kH( A& >ῌm<d%s

(213) ( K( s48K >ῌm<0( RS"8l3s

(214) kHl3 ,**,aI ss

(215) A&( 3lV( . !X)*+,-%q]0( . A& kH( J( A& %m<8( q"k&kK(

(216) 34?

(217) WFG&HI JKL( )*+,-./ #$ 0( qtV)*+,-r8K

(218) %eK

(219) FG&HI . d( . BC6 0 "G54

(220) AD0%. !"8( NBC" ¡54% DEI JgD0( 1"2. DE

(221) FG&HI s54% 0( q¢DE

(222) £8KI BC6 0 ¤¥.

(223) !. .U&H( "( 2 MN

(224) ./D0(. Q "#¦8KV( 2 MN"§¨$g%U&HKI sH &s

(225) A&( £©07ª«¬kHK

(226) FG&HI.

(227) %vwtV% 10( N %®&"F'(Hl3%3s

(228) DEI %vw0(

(229)

(230) .W"j¯ vwDEKL( °lp") ±8K² %vw

(231) %eKI 8A8( X Q50N

(232)

(233) Vs

(234) ³±kHI ´( 8KM0zy5elµ%6( ± ¶DE?

(235) WV( p*"·l3?

(236) WVEI JKL( JN( ¸8K

(237) ³±k H 0+¹º5elµ%?

(238) WEI K(

(239) ±

(240) N », ,Hl3ab( ´{8K

(241) 2-8K

(242) 133. ¼½d%

(243) ³±k.

(244) ./-+

(245) ( ,**1 ). I. J KLMNOPQ8R. abcdeI. J <=-UQVWXY. qrT s]^tQou `. NST <=.-UQVWXYNZT [\]^Q/_NZ K`fghij. vw.OP <=xey6T j. bT k.lmQ n`M5op 4fyz{|54. s]^tQ}~. .xT s]^tm.OP <=Q|MT x3T kIxe1.-UQ|54. . NSZ.s]^tb . M5[\]^Q bG. a.OPhbj. K`fT s]^t.. K`bj. Qc©ªIN!"«Q£¬. bj. Q. J NT <=MNs]^t. OP.xT <=. NST .-`bxx. <=G`)* ¡`.¢2Q£¤. -UQ!"t. `4_NOPij. J T. ¥T <=G.-|¦. `®I. K`. §¨. J. ῌ῎ῑῐ῏῍ Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (+33+). Multiple regression : Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park : Sage. Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Weintraub, J.K. (+323). Assessing coping strategies : A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, /0, ,01ῌ,2-. Compas, B.E., Forsythe, C. J., & Wagner, B.M. (+322). Consistency and variadility in causal attributions and coping with stress. Cognitive Therapy and Research, +,, -*/ῌ-,*. Derogatis, L.R., Lipman, R.S., Richels, K., Uhlenhuth, E.H., & Covi, L. (+31.). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) : A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, +3, +ῌ+/. Derogatis, L.R., Richels, K., & Rock, A.F. (+310). The SCL-3* and the MMPI : A step in the validation of a new self-report scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, +,2, ,2*ῌ,23. Folkman, S. (+32.). Personal control and stress and coping processes : A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, .0, 2-3ῌ2/,. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (+32*). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, ,+, ,+3ῌ,-3. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (+32/). If it changes it must be a process : Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, .2, +/*ῌ+1*. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (+322). Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologists Press. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. (+320). The dynamics of a stressful encounter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, /*, 33,ῌ+**-. Forsythe, C. J., & Compas, B.E. (+321). Interaction of cognitive appraisals of stressful events and coping : Testing the goodness of fit hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Resaerch, ++, .1-ῌ.2/. Frazier, P.A., & Cook, S.W. (+33-). Correlates of distress following heterosexual relationship dissolution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, +*, //ῌ01. Harvey, J.H., & Hansen, A.M. (,***). Loss and bereavement in close romantic relationships. In C. Hendrick, & S.S. Hendrick (Eds.)., Close relationships : A sourcebook. California : Sage Publications. Pp. -/3ῌ-1*. +323 !" #$%&'( %&ῌ)*+, .0, .1ῌ//. +33, -./012345 67)* /0 89:';(, ,-+. +331 <=.)* >? @ A BC.)* DEFGH Pp. ,*/ῌ,+2. Horowitz, Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (+313). Impact of Event Scale : A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, .+, ,*3ῌ,+2. Kaczmarek, M.G., & Backlund, B.A. (+33+). Disenfranchised grief : The loss of an adolescent romantic. 134.

(246)

(247) . . relationship. Adolescence, ,0, ,/-῍,/3. ,***!" #$%&'()*( +,- ./$012 .22 ,,/῍,-.. ,**+!" &'()*(3456 ./$012 .32 ,3/῍-*.. ,**,a!" &'()*(3478 9:, ; <=78$012 .+2 +.1῍+/.. ,**,b!" &'()*( >? @A2 > B

(248) CD$8 E +/ F#8G2 ,*,῍,*-. ,**-!" &'()*( +HI JK56 '1 LM$N#$'$8!2 /,2 /0῍1,. ,**.a!" &'()*( + #OPῌQ ῌRSῌTU VW! ()*( (XYZ[\]^_ < ./` Pp. +32῍,*,. ,**.b!" abcde fg h $2 .12 ,,/῍,.*. ,**/!" ()*(

(249) ij CD

(250) LK56 78$012 ,*2 +1+῍+2*. ,**0!" kl>m&'()*(

(251) ()*( nom

(252) ()*(pYqLrn !"#$'st$uv01wx#2 .2 ++3῍+,2. ,**1!" &'()*(34&'()*( yz{|}` $~ῌ%& +331!" &&'

(253) &(Kn&' COPE! L 01 +!n CD$8E +* F)#8G2 2.. Kirsch, I., Mearns, J., & Catanzaro, S. J. (+33*). Mood regulation expectancies as determinants of depression in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, -1, -*0῍-+,. *ῌMO+ +32-!" ,AL01 ῌ! n,A+U-KῌJK5.n <=78 $012 ,,2 33῍+*2. Lazarus, R.S. (+33-). Coping theory and research : Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, //, ,-.῍,.1. Lazarus, R.S. (+333). Stress and emotion : A new synthesis. New York : Springer Publishing Company. Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (+32.). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York : Springer Publishing Company. Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (+321). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, +, +.+῍+03. Masel, C.N., Terry, D. J., & Gribble, M. (+330). The e#ects of coping on adjustment : Re-examining the goodness of fit model of coping e#ectiveness. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 3, ,13῍-**. / +33-!" t$ [(7 Mearns, J. (+33+). Coping with a breakup : Negative mood regulation expectancies and depression following the end of a romantic relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 0*, -,1῍--.. Meuser, T.M., & Marwit, S. J. (+333῍,***). An integrative model of personality, coping and appraisal for the prediction of grief involvement in adults. OMEGA, .*, -1/῍-3-. 0ῌ1ῌ2 +33+!" =3 4#$./$501x#2 -32 ++1῍ +,0. $ +313!" & ¡n6¢£

(254) ¤¥

(255) n¦§¨© Olsson, U. (+313). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coe$cient. Psychometrika, .., ..-῍.0*. 7LªI +33-!" #$%()*(ab +«¬n)(®_|¯yYq8°±²n³9:# $#$N;´µ01t32 +2 3/῍++.. Radlo#, L.S. (+311). The CES-D scale : A Self-report Depression Scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, +, -2/῍.*+. Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., & Cutrona, C.E. (+32*). The revised UCLA loneliness scale : Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, -3, .1,῍.2*. <=¶· +33*!" z¸¹ºzY»¼HI8° '½>$2 -.2 .+῍/+. Smith, H.S., & Cohen, L.H. (+33-). Self-complexity and reactions to a relationship breakup. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, +,, -01῍-2.. Sorenson, K.A., Russell, S.M., Harkness, D. J., & Harvey, J.H. (+33-). Account-making, confiding, and coping with the ending of a close relationship. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 1-῍20.. 135.

(256) ./-+

(257) ( ,**1 ). . ,*** !"#$%&'( /01234,56789: .*: -2ῌ.3.. !)*+,-.". ῌ῎῍ +. , -. . /. ";<=>? @ABCDEFGHIJKL(M: NDῌOPKLQ R": @STM UVW$XYZCD2: [V;?: ST"\]^_XYZCD2: ABCDàbcdMefKLQ RDghKi;V j: +331 k89l?mnXop: (nXq_;"K: `r?stnXu vUVLw=>"UV Olsson +313: xy +33* Xz{M: |}S~X;i}X LD: fD2c L D: N}Di;VLw *.10: X ;: : }}X L Nf: \ ¡ F+,/*.¢*.,+: n.s.: -£¤ F+,/*.¢+.1+: n.s.: `r£¤ F+,/*.¢*.*+: n.s. ?¥^lC: fM¦C§?¨2cC1L XKLX;: E©ª«}X LD: Nf?¬ Rl[L }®n? Low ¯,Low ¯ -1 °: Low ¯,High ¯ ,* °: High ¯,Low ¯ +3 °: High ¯,High ¯ ,, °l[V mn?±²: (n?. 136.

(258)

(259)

(260) . !"#. $. %Abstract&. E#ects of cognitive appraisal and coping with broken hearts on psychological adjustment after break-up. Tsukasa KATO The e#ects of cognitive appraisal (extent of threat/loss) and of coping behavior on well-being after heart break were examined. Five hundred and seven undergraduate students completed measures of threat, coping behavior, and subjective wellbeing (a period of grieving, a feel of loneliness, and distress). Multiple regression analysis suggested that negative relationship oriented coping (e.g., you painted rejecter in lurid colors.) associated negatively with well-being and that postponed coping(e.g., you let break-up take its own course) associated with faster recovery from grieving even after the e#ects of sex, form of broken heart (dating relationship dissolution or unrequited love). Moreover, the e#ect of negative relationshiporiented coping on recovery from, was found of to be moderated by the perceived threat/loss of the breakup.. 137.

(261)

失恋状況における認知的評価とコーピングが失恋後の心理的適応に及ぼす影響 利用統計を見る

失恋状況における認知的評価とコーピングが失恋後の心理的適応に及ぼす影響利用統計を見る