• 検索結果がありません。

Estimation of the Rainfall Energy Affecting on the Ground

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Estimation of the Rainfall Energy Affecting on the Ground"

Copied!
9
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Estimation

of the Rainfall Energy

Affecting on the Ground・

  NOBUHIRO MINAMI and Masazumi OGURA

Laboratory of Land Conservation, Faculty cがAgriculture

 Abstract : Many investigations on the terminal velocity of a,rain drop and the distribu-tion of raindrops with their diameters in a storm, are totally concerned in rainfall energy・  We proposed semi theoretical equations of rainfall energy refering above investigations and introducing the relationship that count of raindrops per unit area and unit time are shown in the function of rainfall intensity・

 These equations are compared with the others rainfall energy.equations in Fig. 6.  This paper is described as the basic research for the study of soil erosion by rainfall.

      Introduction

 The first stage in the process of soil erosion by a storm is in the splash erosion. In this stage, we will require the estimation of a rainfall energy to discuss on movement of soil particles.

 Results of investigations on the terminal velocties of every raindrop diameters, drop size distribution in unit space have been published. Let us discuss above terms by turns.

      Terminal velocity and mass of a raindrops

 Terminal velocities of raindrops depending on their sizes are attained when the gravitatio-nal forces oh their drops are balanced the resistance forces of the air through which they are falling respectively.

 Published reports by LawSI)and Gunn and Kinzer^) are representative on falling velocity of a raindrop. The former measured their velocities by camera and the latter done by electric charge method for oscillograph recorder. Their results of mea‘surment are in good agreement.

 Terminal velocities of various size drops are plotted in Fig. 1 , where equivalent drop diameter is defined as the diameter of a sphere of equivalent volume.

 A general equation on the relationship between relative terminal velocity y and veloctity function including drop size is expressed in eq. (l) Constants V and the function/, have been・

showed by Gunn and Kinzer2リneq. (2) simply. We will show them・ 1neq. (3) closely.       y=り1       (1)       り= 4..23' 几=jz7o●5      (2)       フ■>=9.45  石=1 − 1 /EXP (0.54z1.14)       (3)丿    where  £)(mm):equivalent diameter  Do=1(mm)         ’yz,(m/S):terminal velocity   yo=1(m/S)          エ=DノDo  フノ=ら/yo .

 Mass of a raindrop Mn (mg) is expressed generally in eq. (4)・

(2)

 Constant

77z and function j is in eq. (5) because raindrop いdiameter is defined as the diameter of a sphere equivalent volume.

      m=7r/ 6 ,ふ=zs         ⊃ ノ▽ ●       (5) 9 8 7       < £ ) i n -^ C O ︵ S / U I )   O y \ A j p O l S A   J B U I U U 9 J L 2 1        1   2   3   4一一  5   6        Equivalentdrop diameter D (mm)

Fig. 1. Terminal velocity of water・drops・ of defferent ・sizes in a stagnant   air and representative curve by equatio瓦j    へ

         Count and amount distribution of r4血drops in unit space

 We consider that in a continuous rainfall with constant iポensity, raindrops belong to in several classes of the range from (£)−j£)/2)t6▽(£)ナdD/1). which have representative diameter D respectively, and the origin of time 励d been defined the just time when a marking raindrop in each classes had landed on'the ground surface.

 After the time pass in dt, those Nぶh raindrops 'jn ・each classes (£)土j£)/2) have been landed on the ground which is in unit area S.  "   犬 ‘ ・

 It seems that at the origin of time Z=O those iVnthかo恥y had eχisted upward from the ground surface in the space with the height of Ydt and raindrop flecks ofy counts have been made one after another by raindrops of N counts in the space・

 According to this consideration, count density of raindrops in the space yoz,(m-3mm-1) is expressed in eq. (6) physically and eq. (7) mathematically。

(3)

e a       S r 5 a     a

1ろ       NQ。= aNofo  fo=\/EχP(か/λ)      〔7〕   where  αj : constant, 7Vo=1(7n-> mm ^)          λ:distribution factor

        ゐ=1 by Marshall and Parmer"         ゐ=2 by Shiotsuki'"

 lf瓦。is defined in eq. (8), total count of raindrops jVJ(m-3)andthe probable count density function of raindrops /,, in the space are shown in eq. (9) and (1()。

    F<Sn ゜ Jo几血      (8)

     NJ=f77von  dL)=yoDOFo,i       (9)

     偏=No。£),/NJ=石/Fo。       ぐ1(1

 iS

二二で7でj≒yhith弛D土dDIl of the di“「Tieterrange in the space Mo°(「Tig/ 「゜“1」

     M。=MbNoD=PJ^oZ:)o3mムダo       圓

de

lごここjjタップなeご

(1‰t:ゴごSs of moisture Aも(tng/ 「) and the probable moisture

F如、= J°゜み几心;     0 MJ= f°゜肩 oJ£)=pjvoDo’ ■maFn 、     0 几。= -W0J9£)/MJ=ふ几/Fo。

        Count of raindrop flecks on the ground and rai皿fall intensity

 If it is defined thalNoD{\lmm 「s).is count of raindrop flecks on the unit area of ground during unit time in the range Zニ)±dD/2 0f the raindrop size, we obtain eq. tt5).

      No。=N。Z(SdはL))=Noz,ら=yo7Voり可Jo       回  If F, is defined in eq. (16),total count of raindrop flecks N(1/m2S)and probable count density function of them are shown as eq.(17) and C18)。

      几=j`゜O 几石血       旧

      iV=Fcμoz:)四几       聞       fヶ,= NouI-:)/N=fJo/几       m

 Total volume of raindrops landed during unit time‘on the unit area ・of ground means rainfall intensity /(mmV 「s), therefore amount density of rainfall ら(mm2/m2S)iS shown in eqバ19)。       乙=MdNqd/P。=VoNoL:)0^mvafmfJo       叫

 If Ft is defined in eq. (20)rainfall intensity 7 and probable amount density function 五 are shown as eq. 闇and (22)。

(4)

J

0ペ添)血

7=L

    /<=/^f,ふ/F。

Hence, from eq. iXD and (21], eq. (23) will be born.

    I/NDo3=琲F,/Fn

I  闘

(22)

(23)

If /o=(mm/h)

and Na=\(1/mmh) are defined, / and

N

are measured

by those units

non dimensional numbers

as eq. (24)are producted.

     i = I/Io 、71=N/No

Eq. (24) is rewriten as eq. (25).      百加=mFも/Fn

(24)

 If observed values of (φT.} are shown in the ・function e-(0, which have only one variable (0,・eq.・(25)is exchanged to eqバ26) which will show the relationship between f and λ.

g(0 = mF4/F。=人λ)

       Rainfall energy

 li El,’(10-6J/ 「mm)is defined as the rainfall energy affecting on the unit area of ground in each raindrop size range (£)±dDIl) during unit time, it is as eq. 飢

      £y=Mz,yjy2,/2===pt。Fo'NoDo’mij'af^fjo       (27)

 When the rainfall energy per unit area and unit rainfall intensity is defined as £o instead of eq. 囲.

      £.=EjZI=(らyo2/2Do)vHr.fJo/瓦      雛  If F, is defined as eq. (29), total energy E (J/m'mm) affecting on the unit area of ground

per unit rainfall intensity and probable density function of the energy /≪ are shown as eq. 閤and (3D.       ダ.

F。=J゛フムLhdx

£=fy£J£)=£002/2)瓦/几

   石=ふ几3几/F,

Where  E,=ρぶ

      Definite

integral values

In this paper. four kinds of basic functions have been used as Table l

S5

^

EJ

22

(5)

15

1.0  2.0

Tabχe: V. Combination of basic functions

combination function is defined as (j、k)

 Definite integral values of combination

functions in. two cases「1」)

and (1。2)

can; be

obtained in Gamma

function with parameter

λas in Table 2.

 In the other cases (2.1) and (2.2), those

values were obtained by Newton

・Cotes.・nu-merical inte!grationmethod

with several λ.

 Relationship between those values and λ

is shown in Fig. 2.

5.0 1.0                   ︱ g n f E A   [ B i s a i u i   J i u i j s n Table l, Values of F。, Et, and F6. ノ / 〆 (2.1) / g /

// / / / / / / / /

/ /

1 ノ /

/ / / / / / / /

//

/ f   / j   / / / / / / 0.003 1-  0.1 5.0 1.0 0.1 0.01 (2.2) | / /

//

y / が ン

/ / / / / rノ −/、 / , ノ ? /ノ /

/y

r     / / / / / / r 0 0 00?i    λ      Å Fig. 2. Definite in:tegral va]ues and λ.

(6)

2 0 25

 Results of observation and discussion

 Equivalent diameter of a raindrop Members in the Laboratory of Agricultural Meteoro-logy of Kyushu University have used the calibrattion curve t`o estimate the equivalent diameter from a fleck diameter D/ of a raindrop landed on the filter paper soaked Methylene Blue.       ゛

 This calibration curve is expressed in eq. (32).

      x=0.305(Z:)r/Do)゜●78      ¨      (32)

 Observation data We counted raindrop flecks on the filterpaper in 18cm X 20cm area. This paper had been offered from Kyushu University and we calculated equvalent diameters by eq. (32》.Data are in Table 3。

       Tab\e 3. Observationdata i,1 1981

no.

date

exposed

time 7

  (S)

count of drops

  intensity of rain

iヲ(π/6)Σ£)5N≪dD/Io

i/n

  y (1/360cm2Ts)

n=N/N。

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5.11 6.21 6.21 7.31 8.04 8.08 8.11 8.22 30 8 3 30 60 20  4 22 715 799 681 654 531 609 474 643  2.38  ,・9.99 22. 70  2.18  0:89  3.05 ↓1.85  2.92 1 ,    ・0.93         5.75        24.36         0.82         0.20         0.71         7.02         0、n 0.391 , 0.576 1.073 0.376 0.225 0.233 0.592 0.247

 Relationship between i/n and i It seems that the relationship between φz and i is expressed in eq. (3l as shown in Fig. 3.

     φz=g(0=μ9  i!> = 0.286  9 = 0.410       (33) ︵ t a ^ N / N ︶ /   ( ≫ / / / ) = ? 1.0 0.5 0 0   5      10      15        t=□1。

(7)

邨; t;│≪> ヽ卜 1 0 1 0 . 1 17

 The relationship will suggest that average volume of a drop increase proportionally to the 9 th power of rainfall intensity.

 Therefore in cases (1.1) and (1.2) values of \ are obtained from eq. (34)and 05).       λ=〔(6/π)(r,.Jr4.5)が9y3      闘       λ=〔(6A)Cro.75/r2.25>!゜〕2/3      (35)  In the other cases (2.1) and (2.2) values of λare obtained graphycally in Fig. 4.

-(2.1)-| 1

/ |

/

ノ〆 〆 50 20 10 司   絢 5 2 / / | 〆

/ 〃 ノ f

/

f ’ / / ̄ ̄ f ’

/ 「 − -4

Z j // 1

//

/ 0.01`−   0.1 1。0  λ 3.0 1 0 1 0.1 0.01 -(2.2) / ノ 1 「 | ・ /

/

/

/ 〃 〆 〆 J 〃 ’ 50 20 10 1Q   へ   哨 5 2 /

−ジ

/ ノ 〃 ’ | ノ − ’ / ● I

/ /

/

〆 〆

乙 -4 / / / Z、 / /ぷX・、

/Å.八

ダy

0 . 1

Fig. 4. Graph for j and E/Eo.

1。0  λ

3.0

 Count and amount distribution of raindrops Let compare with observation values and calculated values on probable density of raindrop counts /n and intensity of rainfall fi. An example is picked up in Fig. 5.

 Energy equation We will obtain energy equations from eq. (30),(34),(35)and Table 2 in two cases (1.1) and (1.2).

      E/Eo=(が/2)cr5.5/√'4.5)〔(6/π)(r,.5/r4.5>'゜〕I/3=14.0f0.1ai         (36)       E/Eo=(りV2)(r2.75/r2.25)〔(6/π')Cro.is/r2.'is^pi゜y3=10.6z`0.137       (37)

 The other cases £/£o are obtained in Fig. 4.

 0n the relationship between rainfall energy and rainfall intensity several papers had been published.・

(8)

1.0                         ″ り                         0 /   l u n o o   1 0   X ; i s u 3 i ︶ a t Q E ︵ 一 〇 J d 0 0 1 2 D/Do 3 1.0               0   1 5 ﹄ 7   s u i n i O A   1 0   A j i s u a p   g t Q E Q O j j 0 4 0 1 2

Fig. 5. Distribution of raindrop counts and amount.

3 0 2 5                   2 0   ︵ 日 日 Z U J / f ︶ 3   A 3 j a u a   r i E i u r e y 15 12   3 D/Do    0         50         100        Rainfallintensityバmm/h)

Fig. 6. Relationship rainfall intensity and rainfall energy    perunit area・ unit rainfall amount.

150

(9)

19

 The eq. (38) had been proposed by Wischmeier and Smith'' which is famous for the element of rainfall factor to predict annual soil erosion loss from farm land.

      E'Cst・foot/acre・inch) = 916 + 3311og /' (inch)      (38)  Exchanging to metric system it become eq. 閤.

      E/E0 = 0.02636£'=8.725(1.363+log O      G9)  Other investigator's results" translated into numerical equations from those graphical curves are as follows;

   Hudson  E/Eo=29〔1−1/EXP〔0.2 0o.e2〕    Ker    E/£o=13.5 j0.12

   Mihara  E/£o=8.0 ;o.2i

 Our estimation values of、rainfall energy are shown in Fig. 6 with other investigator's results.

Conclusion

 From the distribution of raindrop counts and amounts, two equations in the. cases (1.1) and (1.2) will express observation data. On the rainfall energy, it seems that the equation in the case (1.1) showed approximately simlar to resuls in the case (2.1). And in the other cases (1.2) and (2.2), equations are expressed loosely Mihara's results。

 As the conclusion, we consider that our equations should be used depending on each considerations, for example, simplicity, logicality or a substitute of other investigator's equations.

References

1) Laws, J. O., Measurments of the fall-velocity of water-drops and rain drops, Trans.Ainer.  Ceopりs.Union,22, 709―721,(1941)

2) Gunn, R. and G. D. Kinzer, The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets, J. Iぼet.,  6, 243―248, (1949)

3) Marshall, J. S. and W. M. Parmer, The distribution of raindrops with size, J. Met., 5,  165―166, (1948)

4) Shiotsuki, Y., On the flat size distribution of drops from convective rainclouds, J. Met.  SocJ apan.51, 42―60, (1974)

5) Wischmeier, W. H. and D.D. Smith, Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss,  Trans. Amer, Geoがりs,JJni・m,39(2), 285-291, (1958)

6) Smith, D.D. and W. H. Wischmeir , Rainfall erosionAdvances i71 Agronoi。^y,U.  109-148, (1962)

(Manuscript

received : September

7, 1981)

(Published : February

6 ,1982)

Fig. 1. Terminal velocity of water・drops・ of defferent ・sizes in a stagnant   air and representative curve by equatio瓦j    へ
Fig. 3. Relationship between iln and i.
Fig. 4. Graph for j and E/Eo.
Fig. 6. Relationship rainfall intensity and rainfall energy    perunit area・ unit rainfall amount.

参照

関連したドキュメント

This paper is devoted to the investigation of the global asymptotic stability properties of switched systems subject to internal constant point delays, while the matrices defining

In this paper, we focus on the existence and some properties of disease-free and endemic equilibrium points of a SVEIRS model subject to an eventual constant regular vaccination

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

Classical definitions of locally complete intersection (l.c.i.) homomor- phisms of commutative rings are limited to maps that are essentially of finite type, or flat.. The

Yin, “Global existence and blow-up phenomena for an integrable two-component Camassa-Holm shallow water system,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol.. Yin, “Global weak

We study the classical invariant theory of the B´ ezoutiant R(A, B) of a pair of binary forms A, B.. We also describe a ‘generic reduc- tion formula’ which recovers B from R(A, B)

Based on sequential numerical results [28], Klawonn and Pavarino showed that the number of GMRES [39] iterations for the two-level additive Schwarz methods for symmetric

For X-valued vector functions the Dinculeanu integral with respect to a σ-additive scalar measure on P (see Note 1) is the same as the Bochner integral and hence the Dinculeanu