• 検索結果がありません。

RELATIVE E-RINGS(Algorithmic problems in algebra, languages and computation systems)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "RELATIVE E-RINGS(Algorithmic problems in algebra, languages and computation systems)"

Copied!
3
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

RELATIVE E-RINGS

岡山大学理学部 平野康之 (Yasuyuki Hirano)

Faculty of Science, Okayama University

1. INTRODUCTION

In [4, Problem 45], L. Fuchs posed the following problem:

Which rings $R$ satisfy $R\cong End(R^{+})$ ? The author presents

In 1973, P. Schultz [5] gave a partial solution to this problem. In

particular, he studied commutative rings $R$ satisfying $R\cong End(R^{+})$ and he called such rings $\mathrm{E}$-rings. For $\mathrm{E}$-rings,

see

the

book“Additive Groups of Rings I ([3])” by S. Feigelstock.. Recently, in [2] R.

G\"obel,

S. Shelah and L. $\mathrm{S}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\ddot{\mathrm{n}}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{n}$ constructed noncommutative rings $R$

sat-isfying $R\cong End(R^{+})$

.

2. RELATIVE E-RINGS

Let $R$ be a ring with identity. By $R^{+}$ we denote the additive

group

of the ring $R$

.

For

an

element $a\in R$, we have the mapping

$a_{l}$ : R– $R$

defined

by $xarrow ax$. $a_{l}$ is called the left multiplication

induced

by $a$

.

Similarly

we

have the right multiplication induced by $a$

.

Obviously the

sets $\{a_{l}|a\in R\}$ and $\{a_{r}|a\in R\}$ form rings. We denote thses rings by $R_{l}$ and $R_{r}$, respectively.

Definition 2.1. A ring $R$ is called

an

$\mathrm{E}$-ring if

$R_{l}=End(R^{+})$

.

The detailed version of this paperhas been submitted for publication elsewhere.

数理解析研究所講究録

(2)

This notion is generalized as follows.

Definition 2.2. Let $S$ be

a

ring and let $R$ be

a

ring such that $R$ is

a

right $S$-module. A ring $R$ is called

a

left $\mathrm{E}$-ring relative to $S$ if

$R_{l}=End_{S}(R_{S})$

.

Let $\mathrm{Z}$ denote the ring of rational integers. Then

a

left $\mathrm{E}$-ring relative

$\mathrm{Z}$ is nothing else but

an

$\mathrm{E}$-ring. Let $S$ be

a

ring and let $R$ be

a

ring such that $R$ is a right $S$-module. Then $End_{S}(R_{S})$ always contains $R_{l}$

.

Hence

we

can

say that left $\mathrm{E}$-rings relative to $S$

are

those rings $R$ such

that $End_{S}(R_{S})$ is small

as

possible.

From the definition of

a

relative $\mathrm{E}$-ring, the following is obvious.

Proposition 2.3. Let $S$ be a ring and let $R$ be

a

ring such that $R$ is

a

right $S$-module.

If

$R$ is

a

left

$E$-ring relative to $S$ and

if

$f\in End(R_{S})f$ then $f(R)$ is

a

principal right ideal

of

$R$

.

Also

we can

easily

see

the following:

Proposition 2.4. Let $S$ be

a

ring and let $R$ be

a

ring such

that

$R$ is a right S-module.

(1) The ring $R$ is

a

left

$E$-ring relative to $S$

.

(2) Every element

of

$R_{r}$ commutes with any element

of

$End_{S}(R_{S})$

.

As a corollary, we have the following charactrizations ofan E-algebra relative to

a

commutative ring.

Corollary 2.5.

Let

$S$ be a

commutative

ring and $R$ be

an

S-algebra. Then the following

are

equivalent:

(1) $R$ is

an

$E$-ring relative to $S$

.

(2) $R_{r}=End_{S}(R_{S})$

.

(3) $R$ is a commutative ring and $R\cong End_{S}(R_{S})$.

(4) $End_{S}(R_{S})$ is a commutative ring.

(3)

Example 2.6. Let $R$ be

a

commutative ring and let $S=R[x, y]$. Consider the ring $A=S/(x)\oplus S/(y)$. Then A is

a

$S$-algebra, but A

is not a cyclic $S$-module. Clearly $End_{S}(A)\cong A$ and

so

$End_{S}(A)$ is

commutative. Therefore $A$ is a relative $\mathrm{E}$-algebra

over

$S$

.

Example 2.7. Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $S$ be

a

multi-plicatively closed subset of $R$. Then $S^{-1}R$ is

a

relative $\mathrm{E}$-algebra

over

$s$

.

Let $R$ be

a

commutative ring and let $\{I_{n}\}_{n\geq 0}$ be

a

fimily of ideals of

$R$ satisfying the condition that $I_{n}\subseteq I_{m}$ whenever $n\geq m$

.

We

can

then

define

a

topology

on

the set $R$ with

an open

basis $\{a+I_{n}|a\in R,$ $n\geq$

$0\}$

.

This topology is called the linear topology defined by

a

family of

ideals $\{I_{n}\}_{n\geq 0}$

.

Then

we can

construct the completion $\hat{R}$ of $R$. It is

well-known that

$\hat{R}\cong\lim_{arrow n}R/I_{n}$

.

Example 2.8. Let $R$ be

a

commutative ring and consider the linear topology defined by

a

family of ideals $\{I_{n}\}_{n\geq 0}$. Then the completion $\hat{R}$

of $R$ is

a

relative $\mathrm{E}$-algebra

over

$R$

.

REFERENCES

[1] R. A. Bowshell and P. Schultz, Unital rings whose additive endomorphisms

commute, Math. Ann. 228 (1977) 197-214.

[2] R. G\"obel, S. Shelah and L. $\mathrm{S}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\ddot{\mathrm{n}}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{n}$, Generalized E–rings, Lecture Notes in

Pure and Applied Math. Vol. 236 (2004), Dekker.

[3] S. Feigelstock, ADDITIVE GROUPS OF RINGS, I, Research Notes in Math.

Vol. 83 (1971) Pitman, London.

[4] L. Fuchs, Abelian Groups, Publ. House Hungar. Acad. Sci. Budapest, 1958.

[5] P. Schultz, The endomorphism ring of the additive group of a ring, Austral.

Math. Soc. 15 (1973) 60-69.

[6] A. Mader and C. Vinsonhler, Torsion-free $\mathrm{E}\frac{-}{}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}$, J. Algebra 115 (1988)

401-411.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Byeon, Existence of large positive solutions of some nonlinear elliptic equations on singu- larly perturbed domains, Comm.. Chabrowski, Variational methods for potential

The remainder of this paper is organised as follows: the structural properties like diameter, radius, girth, vertex degree, connectivity, planarity, Eulerian, Hamiltonian, and many

Key words: Analytic function; Multivalent function; Linear operator; Convex univalent func- tion; Hadamard product (or convolution); Subordination; Integral operator.... Analytic

If ζ is grounded over all of Spec(R) we will simply say it is grounded. We recall that A ic denotes the class of integrally closed domains, and K ic denotes its limit closure.

For every commutative local ring R, and also for every com- mutative euclidean ring (in particular, for the rings Z and F [X]), the group SL(2, R) is generated by the

We devote Section 3 to show two distinct nontrivial weak solutions for problem (1.1) by using the mountain pass theorem and Ekeland variational principle.. In Section 4,

The commutative case is treated in chapter I, where we recall the notions of a privileged exponent of a polynomial or a power series with respect to a convenient ordering,

Note that various authors use variants of Batanin’s definition in which a choice of n-globular operad is not specified, and instead a weak n-category is defined either to be an