PII. S0161171204401069 http://ijmms.hindawi.com
© Hindawi Publishing Corp.
THE STRUCTURE OF A SUBCLASS OF AMENABLE BANACH ALGEBRAS
R. EL HARTI Received 8 January 2004
We give sufficient conditions that allow contractible (resp., reflexive amenable) Banach al- gebras to be finite-dimensional and semisimple algebras. Moreover, we show that any con- tractible (resp., reflexive amenable) Banach algebra in which every maximal left ideal has a Banach space complement is indeed a direct sum of finitely many full matrix algebras.
Finally, we characterize Hermitian∗-algebras that are contractible.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 46H25, 18G55, 46M20.
1. Introduction. The purpose of this note is to establish the structure of some class of amenable Banach algebras. Let Ꮽ be a Banach algebra over the complex field C. We define a Banach leftᏭ-moduleᐄto be a Banach space which is also a unital left Ꮽ-module such that the linear mapᏭ×ᐄ→ᐄ,(a,x)→ax, is continuous. Right mod- ules are defined analogously. A BanachᏭ-bimodule is a Banach space with a structural Ꮽ-bimodule such that the linear mapᏭ×ᐄ×A→ᐄ,(a×x×b)→axb, is jointly con- tinuous, whereᏭ×ᐄ×Ꮽcarries the Cartesian product topology. A submoduleᐅof a Banachleft, right, bi-Ꮽ-moduleᐄis a closed subspace ofᐄwith the structural Banach left, right, or bi-Ꮽ-module. A Banach leftᏭ-module morphismθ:ᐄ→ᐅis a contin- uous linear map between two left BanachᏭ-modules such thatθ(ax)=aθ(x)for all a∈Ꮽ and allx∈ᐄ. A Banach rightᏭ-module morphism and a BanachᏭ-bimodule morphism are defined analogously. For each Banachleft, bi-moduleᐄonᏭ, the dual ᐄ∗ is naturally a Banachleft, bi- Ꮽ-bimodule with the module actions defined by aT (x)=T (xa), aT (x)=T (xa), andT a(x)=T (ax), for alla∈Ꮽ, T ∈ᐄ∗, and x∈ᐄ, whereT (x)denotes the evaluation ofT atx. Ifᐄ,ᐅ, andᐆare Banachleft, or bi-ᐄ-modules andθ:ᐄ→ᐅ,β:ᐅ→ᐆareleft, bi-module morphisms, then the sequence
Σ: 0 →ᐄ →ᐅ →ᐆ →0 (1.1)
is exact ifθis one-to-one,β=ᐆ, andθ=kerβ. The exact sequenceΣis admissible ifβ has a continuous right inverse, equivalently, kerβhas a Banach space complement inᐅ. The admissible exact sequence splits if the right inverse ofβis Banachleft, bi-module, equivalently, kerβis a Banach space complement inᐅwhich is anᏭ-submodule.
A derivation fromᏭ into a Banach Ꮽ-bimodule ᐄis a linear operator D:Ꮽ→ᐄ which satisfiesD(ab)=D(a)b+aD(b), for alla,b∈Ꮽ. Recall that for anyx∈ᐄ, the mappingδx:Ꮽ→ᐄdefined byδx(a)=ax−xa, a∈Ꮽ, is a continuous derivation,
called an inner derivation. A Banach algebraᏭis said to be contractible if for every BanachᏭ-bimoduleᐄ, each continuous derivation fromᏭintoᐄis inner. We say that Ꮽis amenable whenever every continuous derivation fromᏭintoᐄ∗is inner for each Banach Ꮽ-bimodule ᐄ. Obviously, every contractible Banach algebra is an amenable Banach algebra and the converse is true in the finite-dimension case. It is well known that a finite-dimensional algebra is semisimple if and only if it is isomorphic to a finite Cartesian product of a family of full matrix algebras. UsingTheorem 2.1, it is easy to check that a finite Cartesian product of a family of full matrix algebras is contractible.
The purpose of this note is to contribute to the study of the following questions, raised, respectively, in [2], [3, page 817], and [5, page 212].
Question1.1. Is every contractible Banach algebra semisimple?
Question1.2. Is every reflexive amenable Banach algebra finite-dimensional and semisimple?
Question1.3. Is every contractible Banach algebra finite-dimensional?
Recall that a Banach algebra is called a reflexive Banach algebra if it is reflexive as a Banach space. In this note, we will present two situations in which a contractible Banach algebra is finite-dimensional. First, we will give a partial answer to the above questions, where we assume that each maximal left ideal is complemented as a Banach space. This result improves [5, Proposition IV.4.3] for contractible Banach algebras and [3, Corollary 2.3] for reflexive amenable Banach algebras, where the authors suppose only that all of their primitive ideals have finite codimensions. Second, we will show that a Hermitian Banach∗-algebra is contractible if and only if it is a finite-dimensional semisimple algebra.
2. Preliminaries. In this section, we recall some facts about the structure of con- tractible and amenable Banach algebras. Let Ꮽ be a Banach algebra over the com- plex fieldCand letᏭ∗∗ be the bidual ofᏭwith the usual multiplication defined by ψ·φ(f )=ψ(f )φ(f )for allψ,φ∈Ꮽ∗∗andf∈Ꮽ∗. Consider onᏭ∗∗the BanachᏭ- bimodule structure defined byaT=η(a)T,T a=T η(a)withη:Ꮽ→Ꮽ∗∗the canonical map. Notice that if a Banach algebraᏭhas a bounded approximate identity, then its bidualᏭ∗∗has an identity. It is a fact that a contractible Banach algebra has an iden- tity and an amenable Banach algebra admits bounded right, left, bilateral approximate identities. Of course, a reflexive amenable Banach algebra must be unital. We denote the identity element ofᏭby 1 and we writeᏭ⊗ˆᏭfor the completed projective tensorial product (see [4]). The Banach spaceᏭ⊗ˆᏭis a BanachᏭ-bimodule if we define
a(b⊗c)=ab⊗c, (b⊗c)a=b⊗ca, a,b,c∈Ꮽ. (2.1)
For a unital Banach algebraᏭ, a diagonal of Ꮽis an element d∈Ꮽ⊗ˆᏭ such that ad=da, for alla∈Ꮽ, andπ(d)=1, whereπ:Ꮽ⊗ˆᏭ→Ꮽis the canonical BanachᏭ- bimodule morphism. For such a Banach algebraᏭ, a virtual diagonal ofᏭis an element
d∈(Ꮽ⊗ˆᏭ)∗∗such that
ad=da, ∀a∈Ꮽ, π∗∗(d)=1, (2.2)
whereπ∗∗:(Ꮽ⊗ˆᏭ)∗∗→Ꮽ∗∗is the bidual BanachᏭ-module morphism ofπ. In the fol- lowing theorems, we present characterizations of contractible (resp., amenable) Banach algebras. We recall, respectively, [1, Theorem 6.1] and [6, Theorem 1.3].
Theorem2.1. LetᏭbe a Banach algebra. The following are equivalent:
(1) Ꮽis contractible;
(2) Ꮽhas a diagonal.
Theorem2.2. LetᏭbe a Banach algebra. The following are equivalent:
(1) Ꮽis amenable;
(2) Ꮽhas a virtual diagonal.
We choose as a basis of the algebraMn(C)of alln×ncomplex matrices the set of el- ementary matriceseij. Considerd=n
i,jδijeij⊗eji∈Mn(C)⊗Mn(C). ThenMd=dM, for allM∈Mn(C), andπ(d)=1, whereπ:Mn(C)⊗Mn(C)→Mn(C)is the canonical morphism. It follows thatMn(C)is contractible.
Next, the following propositions hold.
Proposition2.3. LetᏭbe acontractible, amenableBanach algebra. Then, ifθ: Ꮽ→Ꮾis a continuous homomorphism fromᏭinto another Banach algebraᏮwith dense range, thenᏮiscontractible, amenable. In particular, ifᏵis a closed two-sided ideal of acontractible, amenableBanach algebraᏭ, thenᏭ/Ᏽiscontractible, amenabletoo.
Proof. Assume thatᏭis contractible. Letᐄbe a BanachᏮ-bimodule. Consider on ᐄthe structure ofᏭ-bimodule defined bya·x=θ(a)xandx·a=xθ(x). Sinceθ is continuous,ᐄis a BanachᏭ-bimodule. Now, letD:Ꮾ→ᐄbe a continuous derivation.
It is easy to see thatD◦θis a continuous derivation fromᏭto the BanachᏭ-bimodule ᐄ, and thus it is inner. Therefore, there existsx∈ᐄsuch thatD(θ(a))=a·x−x·a= θ(a)x−xθ(a)for alla∈Ꮽ. Sinceθ(Ꮽ)is dense inᏮ, we haveD(b)=bx−xbfor all b∈Ꮾ. It follows thatDis inner andᏮis contractible. IfᏭis amenable, we will consider a continuous derivationD:Ꮾ→ᐄ∗ fromᏮto the dual of the bimoduleᐄand we use the same way to prove thatᏮis amenable.
Proposition2.4[1, Theorems 2.3 and 2.5]. LetᏭbe an amenable Banach algebra and let
Σ: 0 →ᐄ∗ →ᐅ →ᐆ →0 (2.3)
be an admissible short exact sequence of Banach (left, right, or bi-) modules withᐄ∗a dual ofᐄ. ThenΣsplits.
Proposition2.5[1, Theorem 6.1]. LetᏭbe a contractible Banach algebra and let
Σ: 0 →ᐄ →ᐅ →ᐆ →0 (2.4)
be an admissible short exact sequence of Banach (left, right, or bi-) modules. ThenΣsplits.
Remark 2.6. Notice that for each closed two-sided idealᏵ of a reflexive Banach algebra,Ᏽand the quotientᏭ/Ᏽare reflexive Banach algebras too.
Proposition2.7. LetᏭbe a contractible or reflexive amenable Banach algebra and assume thatᏵis a closedleft, two-sidedideal ofᏭwhich has a Banach space comple- ment. Then there exists a closedleft, two-sidedidealofᏭsuch that
Ꮽ=Ᏽ+. (2.5)
Proof. LetᏭbe an amenable Banach algebra and letᏵbe a closedleft, two-sided ideal ofᏵwhich has a Banach space complement. Then the short exact sequenceΣ: 0→Ᏽ→Ꮽ→Ꮽ/Ᏽ→0 is admissible. IfᏭis reflexive, then the spaceᏵwill be the same, and so it will be the dual of the Banachleft, bi-Ꮽ-moduleᏵ∗. ByProposition 2.4,Σ splits andᏵhas a Banach space complement which is aleft, two-sidedideal. WhenᏭ is contractible, byProposition 2.5, we have the result.
3. Main results
Theorem3.1. LetᏭbe a contractible or reflexive amenable Banach algebra. Assume that each maximal left ideal ofᏭis complemented as a Banach space inᏭ. Then there aren1,n2,...,nk∈Nsuch that
ᏭMn1(C)⊕Mn2(C)⊕···⊕Mnk(C). (3.1) Proof. BySection 2, the algebraᏭhas an identity 1Ꮽ. Let(ᏹi)i∈I be the family of all maximal left ideals. Sinceᏹiis complemented as a Banach space for eachi, there exists a left idealisuch thatᏭ=ᏹi⊕i. Notice that
Rad(Ꮽ)=
i
ᏹi (3.2)
is the Jacobson radical ofᏭand
i
i⊆Soc(Ꮽ), (3.3)
where Soc(Ꮽ)is the socle of the algebraᏭ, that is, it is the sum of all minimal left ideals ofᏭand it coincides with the sum of all minimal right ideals ofᏭ. Recall that every minimal left ideal of Ꮽ is of the formᏭe, where e is a minimal idempotent, that is,e2=e≠0 andeᏭe=Ce. On the other hand, for each finite family of minimal idempotents(ek)k∈K, we have
Ꮽ=
k∈K
Ꮽek k∈K
Ꮽ1Ꮽ−ek
. (3.4)
It follows from (3.3) and (3.4) that Soc(Ꮽ)is dense inᏭ/Rad(Ꮽ). This shows that Ꮽ/Rad(Ꮽ)is finite-dimensional. Therefore
Ꮽ=Rad(Ꮽ)
Soc(Ꮽ). (3.5)
If Rad(Ꮽ)≠{0}, this would mean that Rad(Ꮽ)has an identity, which is impossible.
So,Ꮽ=Soc(Ꮽ), and then it is a finite direct sum of certain full matrix algebras.
Corollary3.2. Every commutativecontractible, reflexive amenableBanach alge- braᏭis finite-dimensional and semisimple.
Corollary3.3. LetᏭbe a contractible or reflexive amenable Banach algebra such that every irreducible representation of Ꮽ is finite-dimensional. Then Ꮽ is finite- dimensional and semisimple.
Proof. It is easy to check that every primitive ideal of a Banach algebra is finite- codimensional if and only if each of its maximal left ideals is finite-codimensional. So, the corollary follows.
It should be emphasized that the following result appears in [9] or [5, Corollary in page 212].
Corollary 3.4. Every contractible, reflexive amenable C∗-algebra Ꮽ is finite- dimensional and semisimple.
Proof. Suppose thatᏭis a contractible or reflexive amenableC∗-algebra. Letᏹbe a maximal left ideal. By [7, Theorems 5.3.5 and 5.2.4], the spaceᏭ/ᏹis a Hilbert space.
It follows that the short exact sequence
Σ: 0 →ᏹ →Ꮽ →Ꮽ/ᏹ →0 (3.6)
is admissible, and thusᏹhas a Banach space complement. ByTheorem 3.1,Ꮽis iso- morphic to a finite direct sum of full matrix algebras.
Remark3.5. Recall that a simple algebra is an algebra which has no proper ideals other than the zero ideal. To show that everycontractible, reflexive amenable Ba- nach algebra is finite-dimensional and semisimple, it suffices to prove that everycon- tractible, reflexive amenablesimple contractible Banach algebra is finite-dimensional.
Indeed, letᏭbe a contractible Banach algebra. Letᏼbe a primitive ideal ofᏭ. Then the algebraᏭ/ᏼis acontractible, reflexive amenableBanach algebra. PutᏮ=Ꮽ/ᏼand consider some maximal two-sided idealᏹofᏮ. SinceᏮ/ᏹis acontractible, reflexive amenablesimple Banach algebra, it is finite-dimensional. There exists then a closed two-sided idealsuch thatᏮ=ᏹ⊕. Recall that in a primitive algebra, every nonzero ideal is essential, that is, it has a nonzero intersection with every nonzero ideal of the algebra. It follow thatᏹ=0, and soᏮis finite-dimensional. UsingCorollary 3.2,Ꮽmust be a finite-dimensional and semisimple algebra. This completes the proof.
Proposition3.6. LetᏭbe acontractible, reflexive amenablesimple contractible Banach algebra having a maximal left ideal complemented as a Banach space. ThenᏭ is finite-dimensional.
Proof. IfᏭis an infinite-dimensional simple algebra, then Soc(Ꮽ)=0. Moreover, ifᏭiscontractible, reflexive amenablewith a maximal left ideal complemented as a Banach space, thenᏭhas a nontrivial minimal left ideal. This is a contradiction.
Now, assume thatᏭis a unital Banach∗-algebra which admits at least one stateτ. Then there exists a∗-representationπτofᏭon a Hilbert spaceHτ, with a cyclic vector ζ of norm 1 inHτ such thatτ(a)= πτ(a)ζ,ζ, for all a∈Ꮽ,·,·being the inner product inHτ.
Theorem3.7. A Hermitian Banach∗-algebraᏭis contractible if and only if there aren1,n2,...,nk∈Nsuch that (3.1) holds.
Proof. It suffices to show the “only if” part. Suppose that a Hermitian Banach al- gebraᏭ is contractible. Let T(Ꮽ) be the set of all states ofᏭand let R∗(Ꮽ)be the
∗-radical ofᏭ, that is, the intersection of the kernels of all∗-representations ofᏭon Hilbert spaces. SinceᏭis Hermitian and has an identity, T(Ꮽ)≠∅, and soR∗(Ꮽ)≠Ꮽ. Putπ =
τ∈T(Ꮽ)πτ and H=
τ∈T(Ꮽ)Hτ. Then π is a ∗-representation ofᏭ on H. Consider
π(a)= sup
τ∈T(Ꮽ)
πτ(a). (3.7)
Then · is aC∗-norm onπ(A). LetᏮdenote the closure of(π(Ꮽ), · ). Moreover, π:Ꮽ→Ꮾis a continuous mapping into aC∗-algebraᏮsuch that ker(π)=R∗(Ꮽ). AsᏭ is contractible,Ꮾis also contractible. UsingCorollary 3.4, the algebraᏮhas to be finite- dimensional. Notice thatᏭ/R∗(Ꮽ)is isometric with the∗-subalgebraπ(Ꮽ)ofᏮ. Thus, it follows thatᏭ/R∗(Ꮽ) is finite-dimensional. SinceR∗(Ꮽ) is a finite-codimensional closed two-sided∗-ideal, there exists a closed two-sided idealsuch that
Ꮽ=R∗(Ꮽ)⊕. (3.8)
Next, note thatπ(a)2=sup{τ(a∗a), τ∈T(Ꮽ)} ≥ |a∗a|σ, where|a|σis the spec- tral radius of a∈Ꮽ. By Pták [8], we obtainπ(a)2≥ |a|2σ. So, if a∈R∗(Ꮽ), then
|a|σ=0. Therefore, every element ofR∗(Ꮽ)is quasinilpotent. Notice that in general Rad(Ꮽ)⊆R∗(Ꮽ). SinceR∗(Ꮽ)is a closed two-sided∗-ideal, we haveR∗(Ꮽ)=Rad(Ꮽ), and soᏭis finite-dimensional and semisimple.
References
[1] P. C. Curtis Jr. and R. J. Loy,The structure of amenable Banach algebras, J. London Math.
Soc. (2)40(1989), no. 1, 89–104.
[2] R. El Harti,Contractible Fréchet algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.132(2004), no. 5, 1251–
1255.
[3] J. E. Galé, T. J. Ransford, and M. C. White,Weakly compact homomorphisms, Trans. Amer.
Math. Soc.331(1992), no. 2, 815–824.
[4] A. Grothendieck,Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucléaires, Mem. Amer. Math.
Soc.16(1955), 1–140 (French).
[5] A. Y. Helemski˘ı,Some remarks about ideas and results of topological homology, Confer- ence on Automatic Continuity and Banach Algebras (Canberra, 1989), Proc. Centre Math. Anal. Austral. Nat. Univ., vol. 21, Australian National University, Canberra, 1989, pp. 203–238.
[6] B. E. Johnson,Approximate diagonals and cohomology of certain annihilator Banach alge- bras, Amer. J. Math.94(1972), 685–698.
[7] G. J. Murphy,C∗-Algebras and Operator Theory, Academic Press, Massachusetts, 1990.
[8] V. Pták,On the spectral radius in Banach algebras with involution, Bull. London Math. Soc.
2(1970), 327–334.
[9] Yu. V. Selivanov,Some questions on the homological classification of Banach algebras, Ph.D.
dissertation, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, Moscow, 1978.
R. El Harti: Faculty of Sciences and Techniques (FST), University Hassan I-Settat, BP 577, 2600 Settat, Morocco
E-mail address:[email protected]
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Special Issue on
Modeling Experimental Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaotic Scenarios
Call for Papers
Thinking about nonlinearity in engineering areas, up to the 70s, was focused on intentionally built nonlinear parts in order to improve the operational characteristics of a device or system. Keying, saturation, hysteretic phenomena, and dead zones were added to existing devices increasing their behavior diversity and precision. In this context, an intrinsic nonlinearity was treated just as a linear approximation, around equilibrium points.
Inspired on the rediscovering of the richness of nonlinear and chaotic phenomena, engineers started using analytical tools from “Qualitative Theory of Di
fferential Equations,”
allowing more precise analysis and synthesis, in order to produce new vital products and services. Bifurcation theory, dynamical systems and chaos started to be part of the mandatory set of tools for design engineers.
This proposed special edition of the Mathematical Prob-
lems in Engineering aims to provide a picture of the impor-tance of the bifurcation theory, relating it with nonlinear and chaotic dynamics for natural and engineered systems.
Ideas of how this dynamics can be captured through precisely tailored real and numerical experiments and understanding by the combination of specific tools that associate dynamical system theory and geometric tools in a very clever, sophis- ticated, and at the same time simple and unique analytical environment are the subject of this issue, allowing new methods to design high-precision devices and equipment.
Authors should follow the Mathematical Problems in Engineering manuscript format described at
http://www .hindawi.com/journals/mpe/. Prospective authors shouldsubmit an electronic copy of their complete manuscript through the journal Manuscript Tracking System at
http://mts.hindawi.com/
according to the following timetable:
Manuscript Due December 1, 2008 First Round of Reviews March 1, 2009 Publication Date June 1, 2009
Guest Editors
José Roberto Castilho Piqueira,
Telecommunication and Control Engineering Department, Polytechnic School, The University of São Paulo, 05508-970 São Paulo, Brazil;
[email protected]
Elbert E. Neher Macau,
Laboratório Associado de Matemática Aplicada e Computação (LAC), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São Josè dos Campos, 12227-010 São Paulo, Brazil ; [email protected]
Celso Grebogi,Center for Applied Dynamics Research, King’s College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK; [email protected]
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com