Tomus 45 (2009), 289–300
UNIVERSAL PROLONGATION OF LINEAR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS ON FILTERED MANIFOLDS
Katharina Neusser
Dedicated to Peter W. Michor at the occasion of his 60th birthday
Abstract. The aim of this article is to show that systems of linear partial differential equations on filtered manifolds, which are of weighted finite type, can be canonically rewritten as first order systems of a certain type.
This leads immediately to obstructions to the existence of solutions. Moreover, we will deduce that the solution space of such equations is always finite dimensional.
1. Introduction
A filtered manifold is a smooth manifold M together with a filtration of the tangent bundle T M =T−kM ⊃ · · · ⊃T−1M by smooth subbundles such that the Lie bracket [ξ, η] of a section ξ of TiM and a sectionη ofTjM is a section of Ti+jM. To each point x ∈ M one can associate the graded vector space gr(TxM) =LTxiM/Txi+1M. The Lie bracket of vector fields induces a Lie bracket on this graded vector space, which makes gr(TxM) into a nilpotent graded Lie algebra. This graded nilpotent Lie algebra should be seen as the linear first order approximation to the filtered manifold at the point x.
Studying differential equations on filtered manifolds it turns out that, in addition to replacing the usual tangent space at x by the graded nilpotent Lie algebra gr(TxM), one should also change the notion of order of differential operators according to the filtration of the tangent bundle. One can view a contact structure T M =T−2M ⊃T−1M as a filtered manifold structure. In this special case, this means that a derivative in direction transversal to the contact subbundleT−1M should be considered as an operator of order two rather than one. This leads to a notion of symbol for differential operators on M which fits naturally together with the contact structure and which can be considered as the principal part of such operators. In the context of contact geometry the idea to study differential
2000Mathematics Subject Classification: primary 35N05; secondary 58A20, 58A30, 53D10, 58J60.
Key words and phrases: prolongation, partial differential equations, filtered manifolds, contact manifolds, weighted jet bundles.
This work was supported by Initiativkolleg IK-1008 of the University of Vienna and KWA grant of the University of Vienna.
operators on M by means of theirweighted symbol goes back to the 70’s and 80’s of the last century and is usually referred to as Heisenberg calculus, cf. [1] and [9].
Independently of these developments in contact geometry, T. Morimoto started in the 90’s to study differential equations on general filtered manifolds and developed a formal theory, cf. [5], [6] and [7]. By adjusting the notion of order of differentiation to the filtration of a filtered manifold, he introduced a concept of weighted jet bundles, which provides the convenient framework to study differential operators between sections of vector bundles over a filtered manifold. This leads to a notion of symbol which can be naturally viewed as the principal part of differential operators on filtered manifolds. In [5] and [6] Morimoto also established an existence theorem for analytic solutions for certain differential equations on filtered manifolds.
In [8] D. C. Spencer extracts an important class of systems of differential equations, namely those, for which after a finite number of prolongations their symbol vanishes.
He calls these systems of finite type. Such equations have always a finite dimensional solution space, since a solution is already determined by a finite jet in a single point. Working in the setting of weighted jet bundles one can analogously define systems of differential equations of weighted finite type. If the manifold is trivially filtered, the weighted jet bundles are the usual ones and the definition of weighted finite type coincides with the notion of Spencer.
In this article we will study systems of linear differential equations on filtered manifolds by looking at their weighted symbols. Our aim is to show that to a system of weighted finite type one can always canonically associate a differential operator of weighted order one with injective weighted symbol whose kernel describes the solutions of this system. From this one can immediately see that also in the case of a differential equation of weighted finite type the solution space is always finite dimensional. Additionally, we will see that rewriting our equation in this way as a system of weighted order one leads directly to algebraic obstructions to the existence of solutions.
Acknowledgement. This article evolved from discussions with Micheal Eastwood, who advised me of some aspects of the work of Hubert Goldschmidt and Donald C. Spencer on differential equations. I would also like to thank Andreas Čap and Tohru Morimoto for helpful discussions.
2. Weighted jet spaces
In this section we recall some basic facts about filtered manifolds and discuss the concept of weighted jet bundles of sections of vector bundles over filtered manifolds as it was introduced by Morimoto in [5] in order to study differential equations on filtered manifolds. For a more detailed discussion about differential equations on filtered manifolds and weighted jet bundles see also [7].
2.1. Filtered manifolds. As already mentioned, by a filtered manifold we unders- tand a smooth manifoldM together with a filtrationT M =T−kM ⊃ · · · ⊃T−1M of the tangent bundle by smooth subbundles, which is compatible with the Lie bracket of vector fields. Compatibility with the Lie bracket of vector fields here
means that for sectionsξofTiM andη ofTjM the Lie bracket [ξ, η] is a section ofTi+jM, where we setTjM =T M forj≤ −kandTjM = 0 forj≥0.
Given a filtered manifoldM one can form the associated graded vector bundle gr(T M). It is obtained by taking the pairwise quotients of the filtration components of the tangent bundle
gr(T M) =
−1
M
i=−k
TiM/Ti+1M . We set gr−i(T M) =T−iM/T−i+1M.
Now consider the operator Γ(TiM)×Γ(TjM) → Γ gri+j(T M)
given by (ξ, η) 7→ q([ξ, η]), where q is the projection from Ti+jM to gri+j(T M). This operator is bilinear over smooth functions and therefore induced by a bundle map TiM ×TjM → gri+j(T M). Moreover it obviously factorizes to a bundle map gri(T M)×grj(T M)→gri+j(T M), since forξ∈Γ(Ti+1M) we have [ξ, η]∈ Γ(Ti+j+1M). Hence we obtain a tensorial bracket
{ , }: gr(T M)×gr(T M)→gr(T M)
on the associated graded bundle which makes each fiber gr(TxM) over some point xinto a nilpotent graded Lie algebra. The nilpotent graded Lie algebra gr(TxM) is called the symbol algebra of the filtered manifold at the pointx.
Supposef:M →M0 is a local isomorphism between two filtered manifolds, i.e.
a local diffeomorphism whose tangent map is filtration preserving. Then the tangent map at each point x ∈ M induces an isomorphism between the graded vector spaces gr(TxM) and gr(Tf(x)M0), and compatibility off with the Lie bracket easily implies that this actually is an isomorphism of graded Lie algebras. Hence the symbol algebra atxshould be seen as the first order linear approximation to the manifold at the pointx. In general the symbol algebra may change from point to point. However, we will always assume that gr(T M) is locally trivial as a bundle of Lie algebras.
In addition, we will assume that gr(TxM) is generated as Lie algebra by gr−1(TxM). This means that the whole filtration is determined by the subbundle T−1M and the filtration is just a neat way to encode the non-integrability properties of this subbundle.
In the case of a trivial filtered manifoldT M =T−1M the associated graded is just the tangent bundle, where the tangent space at each point is viewed as an abelian Lie algebra.
Example. SupposeM is a smooth manifold of dimension 2n+ 1 endowed with a contact structure, i.e. a maximally non-integrable distributionT−1M ⊂T M of rank 2n. The fibers gr(TxM) = Tx−1M ⊕TxM/Tx−1M of the associated graded bundle are then isomorphic to the Heisenberg Lie algebrah=R2n⊕R.
2.2. Differential operators and weighted jet bundles. Studying analytic properties of differential operators on some manifoldM, one may first look at the symbols of these operators. IfM is a filtered manifold, it turns out that the usual
symbol is not the appropriate object to consider and it should be replaced by a notion of symbol that reflects the geometric structure onM given by the filtration on the tangent bundle.
Let us consider an example. SupposeMis the Heisenberg groupR2n+1endowed with its canonical contact structureT−1M ⊂T M. Denoting by (x1, . . . , xn, y1, . . . , yn, z) the coordinates onR2n+1and byX1, . . . , Xn, Y1, . . . , Yn, Zthe right invariant vector fields, the distribution is spanned in each point by Xi, Yi for i= 1, . . . , n. Now consider the following operator acting on smooth functions onM
D=
n
X
j=1
−Xj2−Yj2+iaZ with a∈C.
It can be shown, cf. [10], that the analytic properties of this operator highly depend on the constanta. However, this can never be read off from the usual symbol, since the termiaZ is not part of it. This suggests that a derivative transversal to the contact distribution should have rather order two than one to obtain a notion of symbol that includes the term iaZ.
In the case of a general filtered manifold the situation is similar. Once one has replaced the role of the usual tangent space at some pointx∈M by the symbol algebra at that point, one should also adjust the notion of order of differentiation according to the filtration of the tangent bundle, in order to obtain a notion of symbol that can be seen as representing the principal parts of operators onM. Definition.
(1) A local vector fieldξofM is of weighted order≤r, ifξ∈Γ(T−rM). The minimum of all such ris called the weighted order ord(ξ) ofξ.
(2) A linear differential operatorD:C∞(M,R)→C∞(M,R) between smooth functions fromM toRis of weighted order ≤r, if it can be locally written as
D=X
i
ξi1. . . ξis(i)
for local vector fields ξij with Ps(i)
`=1ord(ξi`)≤rfor alli. The minimum of all such ris then the weighted order of D.
Suppose E →M is a smooth vector bundle of constant rank over a filtered manifoldM and denote by Γx(E) the space of germs of sections ofE at the point x∈M. Then we define two sections s, s0 ∈Γx(E) to be r-equivalent∼r if
D(hλ, s−s0i)(x) = 0
for all differential operators Don M of weighted order≤rand all sectionsλof the dual bundleE∗, whereh, i: Γ(E∗)×Γ(E)→C∞(M,R) is the evaluation.
The space of weighted jets of orderrwith sourcex∈M is then defined as the quotient space
Jxr(E) := Γx(E)/∼r . Fors∈Γx(E) we denote byjxrsthe class ofsin Jxr(E).
The space of weighted jets of orderris given by taking the disjoint union over xofJxr(E)
Jr(E) := G
x∈M
Jxr(E) and we have a natural projectionJr(E)→M.
It is not difficult to see that for every vector bundle chart ofEone can construct a local trivialization ofJr(E). Hence we can endowJr(E) with the unique manifold structure such thatJr(E)→M is a vector bundle and these trivializations become smooth vector bundle charts.
The natural projections
πsr:Jr(E)→Js(E) for r > s are then easily seen to be vector bundle homomorphisms.
Denoting byjr: Γ(E)→Γ Jr(E)
the universal differential operator of weighted order r given bys7→ (x7→ jxrs), we can define the weighted order of a general linear differential operator as follows.
Definition. SupposeE andF are vector bundles of constant rank over a filtered manifoldM. A linear differential operatorD: Γ(E)→Γ(F) between sections ofE andF is of weighted order≤r, if there exists a vector bundle mapφ:Jr(E)→F such that D =φ◦jr. The smallest integerr such that this holds, is called the weighted order ofD.
Since, of course, every bundle mapφ:Jr(E)→F defines a differential operator of orderrbyD=φ◦jr, we can equivalently view a differential operator of weighted orderr as a bundle map fromJr(E) toF.
2.3. Weighted symbols of differential operators. The symbolσ(φ) of a diffe- rential operatorφ:Jr(E)→F is the restriction ofφto the kernel of the projection πrr−1: Jr(E)→Jr−1(E). Let us describe this kernel more explicitly:
The associated graded bundle gr(T M) is a vector bundle of nilpotent graded Lie algebras. So one can consider the universal enveloping algebraU gr(TxM)
of the Lie algebra gr(TxM) defined by
U gr(TxM)
=T gr(TxM) /I whereT gr(TxM)
is the tensor algebra of gr(TxM) andIis the ideal generated by elements of the formX⊗Y −Y ⊗X− {X, Y} forX, Y ∈gr(TxM).
The grading of gr(TxM) induces an algebra grading on the tensor algebraT gr(TxM) as follows: An element X1⊗ · · · ⊗X` ∈ T gr(TxM)
is defined to be of degree s, if P
ideg(Xi) = s with deg(Xi) = p for Xi ∈ grp(TxM). Since the ideal I is homogeneous, this grading factorizes to an algebra grading on the universal enveloping algebra
U gr(TxM)
=M
i≤0
Ui gr(TxM) . The disjoint unionF
x∈MUi gr(TxM)
is easily seen to be a vector bundle overM, which we denote byUi gr(T M)
.
Let us now consider the kernel of the projection πrr−1: Jr(E) → Jr−1(E).
Supposesis a local section withjxr−1s= 0 for some pointxand take some local trivialization to write sas (s1, . . . , sn) :U ⊆M →Rn (rank(E) =n) withx∈U.
Forξ1, . . . , ξ`∈TxM with P
iord(ξi) =r we have the multilinear map (ξ1, . . . , ξ`)7→ξ1·. . .·ξ`·s
fromTxM× · · · ×TxM toRn given by iterated differentiation. Since ther−1 jet of satxvanishes, this map induces a linear mapT−r gr(TxM)
→Rn. Additionally we have the symmetries of differentiation, like for exampleξ1·ξ2·. . .·ξ`·s−ξ2· ξ1·. . .·ξ`·s= [ξ1, ξ2]·. . .·ξ`·s, which equals{ξ1, ξ2} ·. . .·ξ`·s, sincejxr−1s= 0.
HenceT−r gr(TxM)
→Rn factorizes to a linear mapU−r gr(TxM)
→Rn. Via the chosen trivialization, any element of the kernel ofπrr−1 determines an element in U−r gr(T M)∗
⊗E and vice versa. It is easy to see that this is independent of the chosen trivialization and so we get the natural exact sequence of vector bundles:
0 −−−−→ U−r gr(T M)∗
⊗E −−−−→ι Jr(E) π
r
−−−−→r−1 Jr−1(E) −−−−→ 0 Hence the symbol of an operatorφ:Jr(E)→F can be viewed as a bundle map
σ(φ) :U−r gr(T M)∗
⊗E→F .
Remark. If M is a trivial filtered manifold T M =T−1M, the bundleJr(E) is just the usual bundle of jets of orderrand we obtain the usual notion of symbol for differential operators. The universal enveloping algebra of the abelian algebra gr(TxM) =TxM coincides with the symmetric algebra ofTxM.
3. Universal prolongation of linear differential equations on filtered manifolds
A differential operatorφ:Jr(E)→F induces the following maps:
The`-th-prolongationp`(φ) :Jr+`(E)→J`(F) ofφgiven by p`(φ)(jxr+`s) =jx` φ(jrs)
.
This is well defined, since the right-hand side just depends on the weightedr+` jet ofsat the pointx. This map can be characterized as the unique vector bundle map such that the diagram
Γ(Jr+`(E))p`(φ) //Γ(J`(F))
Γ(E) φ◦j
r //
jr+`
OO
Γ(F)
j`
OO
commutes.
In particular, we have the bundle map
p`(idr) :Jr+`(E)→J` Jr(E)
where idr is the identity map onJr(E). Any derivative in direction transversal to T−1M can be expressed by iterated derivatives in direction of the the subbundle T−1M, since we assumed that gr−1(TxM) generates gr(TxM) as Lie algebra.
Therefore this vector bundle map is injective.
The operator φinduces also a vector bundle map e`(φ) :J` Jr(E)
→J`(F) defined by
e`(jx`s) =jx` φ(s) . It is the unique vector bundle map such that the diagram
Γ(J`(Jr(E)))e`(φ) //Γ(J`(F))
Γ(Jr(E)) φ //
j`
OO
Γ(F)
j`
OO
commutes. By definition we havee`(φ)◦p`(idr) =p`(φ).
Since we have the inclusion p1(idr) :Jr+1(E) ,→J1 Jr(E)
, we can consider the operatorδrof weighted order one defined by the projection
J1 Jr(E)
→J1 Jr(E)
/Jr+1(E).
This operator can now be characterized, analogously as in [3] for usual jet bundles:
We have the following commutative exact diagram
0
0
0 //U−r−1(gr(T M))∗⊗E //
ι
gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr(E) //
ι
Wr //0
0 //Jr+1(E) p1(idr) //
πr+1r
J1(Jr(E)) δ
r //
π10
J1(Jr(E))/Jr+1(E) //
0
0 //Jr(E) //
Jr(E) //
0
0 0
where the inclusion ofU−r−1 gr(T M)∗
⊗Einto gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr(E) is obtained by the commutativity of the next two rows and the spaceWris defined by the diagram.
Moreover, this diagram induces an isomorphism of vector bundles betweenWrand J1 Jr(E)
/Jr+1(E). Therefore we can viewδras an operator from J1 Jr(E) to Wr. Hence we have the following proposition:
Proposition 1. There exists a unique differential operator δr:J1 Jr(E)
→Wr
of weighted order one such that
• the kernel ofδr isJr+1(E)
• the symbolσ(δr) : gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr(E)→Wr is the projection.
Proof. The uniqueness follows from the exactness of the diagram above.
By a similar reasoning as in [3] we can now deduce the existence of a first order operator S:J1 Jr(E)
→ gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr−1(E). We will call S the weighted Spencer operator.
Proposition 2. There exists a unique differential operator S:J1 Jr(E)
→gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr−1(E) of weighted order one such that
• Jr+1(E)⊆ker(S)
• the symbolσ(S) : gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr(E)→gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr−1(E)isid⊗πrr−1. Moreover, we have the following exact sequence of sheaves:
0 −−−−→ Γ(E) j
r
−−−−→ Γ(Jr(E)) S◦j
1
−−−−→ Γ(gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr−1(E)) −−−−→ 0 Proof. If such an operator exists, it must factorize overδr by proposition 1, since Jr+1(E)⊆ker(S). This means that it has to be of the form S=ψ◦δrfor some bundle map ψ:Wr →gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr−1(E). By the second propertyψ has to satisfy that σ(S) =ψ◦σ(δr) equals the projectionid⊗πr−1r . To see that such a map ψexists, we have to show that id⊗πr−1r factorizes overσ(δr).
We already know that ker σ(δr)
= ker(πrr+1), which is mapped under the inclusionp1(idr) :Jr+1(E),→J1 Jr(E)
to gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr(E). Since the map e1(πr−1r ) :J1 Jr(E)
→J1 Jr−1(E)
has symbolι◦id⊗πrr−1 and we have the following commutative diagram
Jr+1(E) −−−−→p1(idr) J1(Jr(E))
πrr+1
y
ye1(π
r r−1)
Jr(E) −−−−−−→p1(idr−1) J1(Jr−1(E))
we conclude that ker(πr+1r ) is mapped under the inclusionp1(idr) to the kernel of id⊗πr−1r . Hence id⊗πrr−1 factorizes over σ(δr). So there exists a unique bundle mapψ:Wr→gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr−1(E) withψ◦σ(δr) = id⊗πrr−1and we can define S=ψ◦δr.
To show the exactness of the sequence above let us describeS in another way.
Consider the bundle map
e1(πr−1r )−p1(idr−1)◦π10:J1 Jr(E)
→J1 Jr−1(E) .
Since π01◦e1(πrr−1) = π01◦p1(idr−1)◦π01, this operator actually has values in gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr−1(E). Moreover,Jr+1(E) lies in its kernel by the commutative diagram above and the symbol is given by the symbol of e1(πrr−1) which equals
ι◦id⊗πrr−1. Hence viewingS as an operator fromJ1 Jr(E)
toJ1 Jr−1(E) by means of the inclusionι: gr−1(T M)∗⊗Jr−1(E),→J1 Jr−1(E)
, we must have S=e1(πr−1r )−p1(idr−1)◦π10:J1 Jr(E)
→J1 Jr−1(E) .
Suppose now we have a section ofJr(E) which can be written as jrsfor some s∈ Γ(E). Then it lies in the kernel ofS◦j1, sincee1(πr−1r )◦j1(jrs) =j1 πr−1r (jrs)
= j1(jr−1s) =p1(idr−1)(jrs).
To show the converse one can proceed by induction onr.
Ifr= 1, then for s∈Γ J1(E)
to be in the kernel of S◦j1means j1 π10(s)
= p1(id0)s = s. Now suppose the assertion holds for r. If s ∈ Γ Jr+1(E)
satis- fies j1 πr+1r (s)
=p1(idr)(s), thene1(πrr−1) j1(πr+1r (s))
=e1(πrr−1) p1(idr)(s) . From the commutative diagram above we know that the right side coincides withp1(idr−1) πr+1r (s)
. By the induction hypothesis πrr+1(s) =jr(u) for some u∈Γ(E). Nowsmust equaljr+1u, sincep1(idr)(s) =j1 πrr+1(s)
=j1(jru) and
p1(idr) is injective.
Now we want to study systems of linear differential equations on filtered manifolds.
Suppose we have a vector bundle map
φ: Jr(E)→F
of constant rank, then the subbundle of Jr(E) defined by its kernel Qr:= ker(φ)
is called the linear system of differential equations associated to the operatorφ. A solution ofQris a section sofE satisfyingφ(jrs) = 0.
The`-th prolongationQr+` ofQris defined to be the kernel ofp`(φ) :Jr+`(E)→ J`(F). Since the diagram
0
0
Jr+`(E) p`(φ) //
p`(idr)
J`(F)
id
0 //J`(Qr) //J`(Jr(E))e`(φ) //J`(F) commutes, we have
Qr+`=J`(Qr)∩Jr+`(E).
In general, the bundle map p`(φ) is not of constant rank andQr+` need not to be a vector bundle. We callφ:Jr(E)→F regular, ifp`(φ) is of constant rank for all
`≥0.
The symbol of the prolonged equationQr+`is the family of vector spacesgr+`:=
{gr+`x }x∈M over M, wheregxr+` is the kernel of the linear map Qr+`x →Qr+`−1x given by the restriction of the projection πr+`−1r+` to Qr+`x .
For all`≥1 we have a bundle map σ`(φ) :U−r−` gr(T M)∗
⊗E→ U−` gr(T M)∗
⊗F ,
which we call the`-th symbol mapping. It is defined by the following (fiberwise) commutative diagram:
0
0
0
0 //gr+` //
U−r−`(gr(T M))∗⊗Eσ`(φ) //
U−`(gr(T M))∗⊗F
0 //Qr+` //
Jr+`(E) p`(φ) //
J`(F)
0 //Qr+`−1 //Jr+`−1(E) p`−1(φ) //J`−1(F) By definition the kernel ofσ`(φ) isgr+`viewed as a subset ofU−r−` gr(T M)∗
⊗E.
SinceQr+`=J`(Qr)∩Jr+`(E) and the diagram Jr+`(E) −−−−→p`(idr) J`(Jr(E))
πr+`r+`−1
y
yπ
`
`−1
Jr+`−1(E) −−−−−−→p`−1(idr) J`−1(Jr(E)) commutes, we conclude that
gxr+`=U−r−` gr(TxM)∗
⊗Ex∩ U−` gr(TxM)∗
⊗Kx
whereK={Kx}x∈M is the kernel of the symbolσ(φ) ofφ.
A differential equationQr⊂Jr(E) is called of finite type, if there existsm∈N such thatgr+`x = 0 for allx∈M and`≥m.
For equations of finite type we can prove the following theorem:
Theorem. SupposeM is a filtered manifold such thatgr(T M)is locally trivial as a bundle of Lie algebras andgr−1(TxM)generatesgr(TxM)for allx∈M and suppose E andF are vector bundles over M.
LetD: Γ(E)→Γ(F)be a regular differential operator of weighted orderr defining a system of differential equations of finite type. Then for some `0∈Nthere exists a differential operator
D0: Γ(Qr+`0)→Γ(Wr+`0) of weighted order one with injective symbol such that s7→jr+`0sinduces a bijection:
{s∈Γ(E) :D(s) = 0} ↔ {s0 ∈Γ(Qr+`0) :D0(s0) = 0}.
Proof. Let us denote byφ:Jr(E)→F the bundle map associated toD and by Qr⊆Jr(E) the differential equation given by the kernel ofφ. For all`≥0 we can
consider the operatorDr+`: Γ(Qr+`)→Γ(Wr+`) of weighted order one given by the restriction of δr+`◦j1to Γ(Qr+`).
Ifs∈Γ(E) is a solutionDs= 0, thenjr+`s∈Γ(Qr+`) and sincej1(jr+`s) is a section ofJr+`+1(E)⊆J1 Jr+`(E)
we also have Dr+`(jr+`s) = 0.
And conversely, ifs0 is a section ofQr+` such thatDr+`(s0) = 0, thenj1s0 is a section of Jr+`+1(E). SinceJr+`+1(E) is contained in the kernel of the weighted Spencer operator J1 Jr+`(E)
→J1 Jr+`−1(E)
, the sections0 equalsjr+`sfor some section s∈Γ(E). Obviouslyπr+`0 (jr+`s) =sthen satisfiesDs= 0.
This shows that for all`≥0 the mapjr+`induces a bijection between solutions ofD and solutions ofDr+`. So it remains to prove that there exists some`0 such that Dr+`0 has injective symbol.
The symbol of Dr+` is a bundle map U−1 gr(T M)∗
⊗Qr+` → Wr+`. We know that the kernel ofσ(δr+`) isU−r−`−1 gr(T M)∗
⊗E. SinceDr+` is just the restriction ofδr+`◦j1 to Γ(Qr+`), we obtain that
ker σ(Dr+`)
x=U−r−`−1 gr(TxM)∗
⊗Ex∩ U−1 gr(TxM)∗
⊗gxr+`. Butgxr+`=U−r−`(gr(TxM))∗⊗Ex∩ U−`(gr(TxM))∗⊗Kx whereKis the kernel of the symbol ofD. Therefore we get
ker σ(Dr+`)
x=U−r−`−1 gr(TxM)∗
⊗Ex∩ U−`−1 gr(TxM)∗
⊗Kx
which coincides withgr+`+1x .
Since the equationQr is of finite type, there exists`0such thatgr+`0+1= 0 and hence Dr+`0: Γ(Qr+`0)→Γ(Wr+`0) is a differential operator of weighted order one with injective symbol, whose solutions are in bijective correspondence with
solutions of the original equation Qr.
As a consequence of this theorem, we obtain that a solution of a regular diffe- rential equation of weighted finite type is already determined by a finite jet in a single point, since a solution ofDr+`0(s0) = 0 is determined by its value in a single point. Hence the solution space of a differential equation of weighted finite type is always finite dimensional.
Moreover, sinceDr+`0 is of weighted order one with injective symbol, it induces a vector bundle mapρ:Qr+`0 →Wr+`0/U−1 gr(T M)∗
⊗Qr+`0.
Any solution s0 of Dr+`0 must clearly also satisfy ρ(s0) = 0, which leads to obstructions for the existence of solutions.
Remark. The fact that a differential equation of weighted finite type has finite dimensional solution space was (by other means) already earlier observed by Morimoto, [4].
References
[1] Beals, R., Greiner, P. C.,Calculus on Heisenberg manifolds, Ann. of Math. Stud.119(1988), x+194 pp.
[2] Goldschmidt, H.,Existence theorems for analytic linear partial differential equations, Ann.
Math.86(1967), 246–270.
[3] Goldschmidt, H.,Prolongations of linear partial differential equations: A conjecture of Élie Cartan, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4)1(1968), 417–444.
[4] Morimoto, T., private communication.
[5] Morimoto, T.,Théorème de Cartan-Kähler dans une classe de fonctions formelles Gevrey, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A Math.311(1990), 443–436.
[6] Morimoto, T.,Théorème d’existence de solutions analytiques pour des systèmes d’équations aux dérivées partielles non-linéaires avec singularités, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math.
321(1995), 1491–1496.
[7] Morimoto, T.,Lie algebras, geometric structures and differential equations on filtered mani- folds, In “Lie Groups Geometric Structures and Differential Equations - One Hundred Years after Sophus Lie”, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., Math. Soc. of Japan, Tokyo, 2002, pp. 205–252.
[8] Spencer, D. C.,Overdetermined systems of linear partial differential equations, Bull. Amer.
Math. Soc.75(1969), 179–239.
[9] Taylor, M. E.,Noncommutative microlocal analysis I, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.52 (313) (1984), iv+182 pp.
[10] van Erp, E.,The Atiyah-Singer index formula for subelliptic operators on contact manifolds.
Part 1, To appear in Ann. of Math. preprint arXiv: 0804.2490.
Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna Nordbergstraße 15, A-1090 Wien, Austria E-mail:[email protected]