ソフトウェア開発プロセスの複雑さに着目したプロダクト品質の予測モデルの構築
全文
(2) ソフトウェアエンジニアリングシンポジウム 2011 ➼㸧ࡑࡢ㞀ᐖ௳ᩘࡽ㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࢆồࡵࡿ㸬ᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡸ㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲ࡣ⤌⧊ẖグ㏙ ᪉ἲࡸ⟶⌮㡯┠ࡢ⢏ᗘࡀ␗࡞ࡿ㸬ࡋࡋ㸪PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡣ⤌⧊ẖసᡂࡍࡿࡓࡵ㸪⟶ ⌮㡯┠ࡢ⢏ᗘࡀ␗࡞ࡗࡓࡋ࡚ࡶᵓ⠏࡛ࡁࡿỗ⏝ⓗ࡞ࣔࢹ࡛ࣝ࠶ࡿ㸬PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆ ⏝࠸࡚ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺᐇ⾜୰ࡢ PC ್ࡽ᭱⤊ࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢရ㉁ࢆண ࡍࡿࡀ࡛ࡁࡿ㸬 ࡋࡓࡀࡗ࡚㸪㢳ᐈࡢせ௳ኚ᭦➼ࡢィ⏬እࡢసᴗᐇ⾜ࡀ᭱⤊ࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺရ㉁࠼ࡿᙳ 㡪ࢆ᪩ᮇุ᩿ࡋ㸪ィ⏬ࡢタィࡢ᪉㔪ࢆỴᐃࡍࡿࡇ⏝࡛ࡁࡿࣔࢹ࡛ࣝ࠶ࡿ㸬 㸰❶࡛ࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫ࣓ࢺࣜࢡࢫࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࣜࢫࢡ⟶⌮ࡢ㛵㐃◊✲ࢆ♧ࡋ㸪㸱❶࡛ ࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࡢィ ᡭἲ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆᥦࡍࡿ㸬㸲❶࡛ࡣ㸴ࡘࡢᐇࣉࣟࢪ ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ㐺⏝ࢆ♧ࡋ㸪㸳❶ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉ㞀ᐖⓎ⏕ࡘ࠸࡚⪃ᐹࡋ㸪㸴 ❶࡛ࡲࡵᚋࡢㄢ㢟ࢆ㏙ࡿ㸬. ࡍࡿ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺရ㉁ࡢ㛵ಀࡲ࡛ゝཬࡍࡿⅬࡀ␗࡞ࡿ㸬 ࣉࣟࢭࢫࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺရ㉁ࡢ㛵ಀゝཬࡋࡓ◊✲ࡣ㸪㟷ᮌࡽࡀࢪࣕࣝ㛤Ⓨࡢᐇ ドࢹ࣮ࢱ࡚ࣉࣟࢭࢫࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢ㛵ಀࢆᑟ࠸ࡓ[12]㸬ࣞࣅ࣮ࣗᅇᩘࡸࢸࢫࢺࢣ࣮ ࢫᅇᩘ➼ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫ࣓ࢺࣜࢡࢫ್ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࢸࢫࢺᕤ⛬ࡢࣇ࢛࣮ࣝࢺᩘࡢ㛵ಀࢆ㔜ᅇ ᖐᘧ࡚ồࡵࡓ㸬ᮏ◊✲ࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢ㛵ಀࢆ᫂☜ࡍࡿ࠸࠺◊✲┠ⓗ ࡣྠࡌ࡛࠶ࡿࡀ㸪ᡃࠎࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࢆ⏝࠸ࡿࡢᑐࡋ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫ࣓ࢺࣜࢡࢫࢆ ィ⏬ࣇ࢙࣮ࢬ. ศᯒ. ศᯒࣇ࢙࣮ࢬ. ศᯒ. タィ. ᐇ. タィ. ᐇ. ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫ. ࢸࢫࢺ. ࢸࢫࢺ. ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺ ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺ ࣉࣟࢭࢫ ࣉࣟࢭࢫ ୍ 㒊 ࡢ ᶵ ⬟ ࢆ ࣉ ࣟ ࢺ ࢱ ࣉ ୍㒊ࡢᶵ⬟ࢆḟᅇࣂ࣮ࢪࣙࣥ ࡛ࡢ㛤Ⓨࡍࡿ 㛤Ⓨࡍࡿ.. 2. 㛵㐃◊✲ ࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘㛤Ⓨࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆ࣓ࢺࣜࢡࢫ࡛ィ ࡍࡿ◊✲ࡣከࡃᐇࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬 CMM ࡣࣁࣥࣇ࣮ࣜࡀ♧ࡍࣉࣟࢭࢫᡂ⇍ᗘࣔࢹ࡛ࣝ࠶ࡾ㸪⤌⧊࠾ࡅࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᡂ ⇍㛵ࡍࡿ㸳ࣞ࣋ࣝࢆᥦࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ[5]㸬ࣞ࣋ࣝࢆỴᐃࡍࡿ㝿ᵝࠎ࡞࣓ࢺࣜࢡࢫ㸦⥲ ྜヨ㦂Ḟ㝗⋡㸪ヨ㦂ᐦᗘ㸪ࣞࣅ࣮ࣗᐦᗘ➼㸧್ࡀ㞟ࡉࢀࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪ᆏᮏࡽࡣᴗෆ ࡛࢛࣮࢘ࢱࣇ࢛࣮ࣝ㛤Ⓨࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫᨵၿࢆ⤌⧊ⓗᐇࡋࡓ㸬ࣞࣅ࣮ࣗᐇᅇᩘࡸᣦ 㡯ᩘࢆィ ࡍࡿ࣓ࢺࣜࢡࢫࡋ࡚㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫᨵၿᗘྜ࠸ࢆィ ࡋࡓ[6]㸬 ࡲࡓ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫࣔࢹࣜࣥࢢࡘ࠸࡚ࡢ◊✲ࡶከࡃᥦࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬Cugola ࡽࡣᐜ᫆ ࢱࢫࢡࢆ㏣ຍࡍࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࣔࢹࣝゝㄒࢆᥦࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ[7]㸬Fuggetta ࡽ ࡣࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘㛤Ⓨ⎔ቃ࠾ࡅࡿၥ㢟Ⅼࡸᵝࠎ࡞㛤Ⓨࣉࣟࢭࢫ࠾ࡅࡿၥ㢟ࢆゎỴࡍ ࡿࡓࡵࡢࢶ࣮ࣝࢆᥦࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ[8]㸬ࡉࡽ㸪Garcia ࡽࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫࣔࢹࣝࡢಖᏲᛶࡸኚ ᭦ᐜ᫆ᛶ࡞ࢆ㸪GQM ࣮࣋ࢫࡢ࣓ࢺࣜࢡࢫ࡛ホ౯ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ[9]㸬ಟṇసᴗࡢ㏣ຍࢆኚ ᭦ᐜ᫆ᛶࡋ࡚╔┠ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿⅬࡣᡃࠎࡢᥦࡍࡿࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫఝ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬 ࡇࢀࡽࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࣔࢹࣜࣥࢢࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࢆࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢺࡍࡿࡇ࡛ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢホ ౯ࡸᨵၿࢆࡍࡿࡇࡀ┠ⓗ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ᡃࠎࡢ◊✲࡛ࡣ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺෆ࡛ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」 㞧ࡉࡢኚࢆィ ࡋ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢ㛵ಀࢆ᫂☜ࡍࡿࡇࡀ┠ⓗ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬 ୍᪉㸪ᐇ㊶ⓗ࣋ࢫࢺࣉࣛࢡࢸࢫࡢ⤒㦂ࢆࡶ㸪」ᩘࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆ⤫ྜࡋ࡚ᡂ㛗 ࡋࡓᐇ㊶ⓗ࡞ࣛࢩࣙࢼࣝ⤫୍ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀᥦࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ[10]㸬ᆺ㛤Ⓨ㸪࣮ࣘࢫࢣ ࣮ࢫ㥑ື㸪ࣜࢫࢡ㥑ື➼ࡢ⪃࠼᪉ࢆྲྀࡾධࢀ㸪ࢪࣕࣝࡸ.NET ➼ࡢ᭱᪂ᢏ⾡ࢸ࣮࣐ ࡶᑐᛂࡋࡓᐇ㉁ⓗ࡞⤫ྜࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬⟶⌮ࡢၥ㢟ࡸつᶍࡢၥ㢟ࡶ࠶ࡿࡀ㸪య⣔ ⓗ࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᐇ㊶ࡣ᭷┈࡞⤫ྜࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛࠶ࡿ[11]㸬ࡦࡘࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛」 ᩘࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀΰᅾࡍࡿ࠸࠺⪃࠼᪉ࡣᡃࠎࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࡢ⪃࠼ఝ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬 ࡋࡋ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫయ⣔࡛࠶ࡿࣛࢩࣙࢼࣝ⤫୍ࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺᐇ⾜୰⣽ ࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡣ᰿ᮏⓗ␗࡞ࡿⓎ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡉࡽᥦ. タィࣇ࢙࣮ࢬ. ศᯒ. タィ. ᐇ. ࢸࢫࢺ ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺ ࣉࣟࢭࢫ. ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢ㐃ᦠᶵ⬟㛤 Ⓨࡢࡳࢆᚋࡢసᴗࡍࡿ. せ௳ᐃ⩏ࡢ࣑ࢫ࡛タィసᴗ. ᐇࣇ࢙࣮ࢬ ศᯒ. タィ. ᐇ. ࢸࢫࢺ. ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺ ࣉࣟࢭࢫ せ௳ᐃ⩏ࡢ࣑ࢫ୍࡛㒊ࡢᶵ⬟ࡢ タィᐇ. 㛤Ⓨ㐜ᘏࡢࡓࡵ㸪୍㒊ࡢᶵ⬟ࡢ ᐇ⌧ࢆḟᅇࣂ࣮ࢪࣙࣥ.. ࢸࢫࢺࣇ࢙࣮ࢬ ศᯒ. タィ. ᐇ. ࢸࢫࢺ. ᛶ⬟ᨵၿࡢࡓࡵ㸪୍㒊ࡢᶵ⬟ࡢ タィ㸪ᐇ㸪ࢸࢫࢺ. ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺ ࣉࣟࢭࢫ. ᅗ 1 ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᴫᛕ Figure 1 A concept of fragment process 2. © 2011 Information Processing Society of Japan.
(3) ソフトウェアエンジニアリングシンポジウム 2011 (1) ࠶ࡽࡺࡿᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡽᐜ᫆ᢳฟ࡛ࡁࡿᇶᮏⓗ࡞せ⣲ࡢࡳࢆ⏝ࡍࡿ㸬ࡇࢀ ࡼࡾᚑ᮶ࡢᐃ㔞ⓗࣉࣟࢭࢫ⟶⌮ᡭἲ[14] ࡢᑐ㇟࡛࠶ࡿ CMM ࣞ࣋ࣝ㸳௨ୖࡢ ⤌⧊࡛࠶ࡿᚲせࡀ࡞ࡃ࡞ࡿ㸬 (2) ᢳฟ࡛ࡁࡿせ⣲ࡢ࠺ࡕ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫᐇ⾜ࡢ」㞧ࡉᙳ㡪ࡍࡿせ⣲↔Ⅼࢆ⤠ࡿ㸬 (3) ࡦࡘࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࡢ」㞧ࡉࡣ㸪」ᩘせ⣲ࡀ࠾࠸┦ⓗᙳ㡪 ࡍࡿࡢ࡛㸪ᢳฟࡉࢀࡓせ⣲ࢆ⟬ࡋ࡚ồࡵࡿ㸬 (4) 」ᩘࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀྠᐇ⾜ࡍࡿሙྜ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫయࡢ」㞧ࡉࡣྠ ᐇ⾜ࡍࡿࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࡢ⥲ࡍࡿ㸬 (5) ྠ୍⤌⧊ࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲グ㍕ࡉࢀࡓ㡯┠ࡸࡑࡢ⢏ᗘࡣྠ୍ࡢࡶࡢ௬ᐃࡍࡿ㸬 ୖグࡢ᪉㔪ᇶ࡙ࡁ㸪ᥦࡍࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࡢ PC ್ࢆ௨ୗ♧ࡍ㸬. ⏝࠸࡚࠸ࡿⅬ࡛␗࡞ࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫ࣓ࢺࣜࢡࢫࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡀ⤊ࡋࡓⅬ࡛ ☜ᐃࡍࡿ್࡛࠶ࡿࡓࡵ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ㏵୰࡛ィ ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸Ⅼࡀᮏ◊✲ࡣ␗࡞ࡿ㸬. 3. Process Complexity ࡢィ ᪉ἲ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢᥦ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࡽ᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢရ㉁ࢆண ࡍࡿࡶࡢ࡛ ࠶ࡿ㸬ᮏ❶࡛ࡣ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆᵓ⠏ࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢ Process Complexity ್㸦௨ୗ PC ್㸧 ࡘ࠸࡚ㄝ᫂ࡋࡓᚋ㸪PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢᥦᵓ⠏᪉ἲࢆ㏙ࡿ㸬 3.1 ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫ ࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘㛤Ⓨ࠾࠸࡚㸪㛤Ⓨయࢆࡦࡘࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡋ࡚ィ⏬ࡋᐇ⾜ࡍࡿࡇ ࡀከ࠸㸬ࡋࡋ㸪ᐇ㝿ࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛ࡣィ⏬ᕤ⛬࡛ணᐃࡋࡓ㛤Ⓨࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛ࣉࣟ ࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡀ⤊ࡍࡿࡇࡣ⛥࡛࠶ࡿ㸬࠼ࡤ࢛࣮࢘ࢱࣇ࢛࣮ࣝ㛤Ⓨࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛㛤Ⓨィ ⏬ࢆసᡂࡋࡓࡋ࡚ࡶ㸪㢳ᐈࡢせᮃࡼࡿࣉࣟࢺࢱࣉࡢసᡂࡸ㸪ᵝኚ᭦㸪ࡲࡓࢸ ࢫࢺᕤ⛬୰ࡢࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛኚ᭦➼ࡼࡾ㏣ຍసᴗࡀ㝶Ⓨ⏕ࡋ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺయࡋ ࡚ࡢ㛤Ⓨࣉࣟࢭࢫࡣ」㞧ࡍࡿ㸬ᮏ✏࡛ࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢィ⏬ẁ㝵࡛Ỵᐃࡉࢀࡓ㛤Ⓨ ࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࡧ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ୰Ⓨ⏕ࡋࡓィ⏬እࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆࣇ ࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡪ㸬ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࡣࠕ᩿∦ࠖ࠸࠺ព࡛࠶ࡾ㸪࣮࣋ࢫࣉ ࣟࢭࢫ᩿∦ⓗ㏣ຍࡉࢀ㸪୪⾜ᐇ⾜ࡉࢀࡿᵝࡽࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫྡࡋࡓ㸬 㐣ཤࡢࡢ୍㒊ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᴫᛕࢆᅗ㸯♧ࡍ㸬ィ⏬ࣇ࢙࣮ ࢬ࡛ࡣศᯒ㸪タィ㸪ᐇ㸪ࢸࢫࢺࡢ༢⣧࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛࠶ࡗࡓ㸬ከࡃࡢሙྜ㸪ィ⏬ ࡣࢩࢫࢸ࣒㛵ࡍࡿሗࡀᑡ࡞࠸㸦ศᯒࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸㸧ࡓࡵ㸪⣽࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫ࠸࠺ ࡼࡾࡶࡲ࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸦࣐ࢡࣟࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸧[13]࡛ィ⏬ࡍࡿࡇࡀከ࠸㸬ࡋࡋ㸪ࣉ ࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡀ㐍⾜ࡍࡿሗ㔞ࡀከࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡶ」㞧ኚࡍࡿ㸬ᅗ㸯ࡢሙྜ㸪 ศᯒࡣᙜึணᐃࡋ࡚࠸࡞ࡗࡓࣉࣟࢺࢱࣉ㛤Ⓨࡀ㢳ᐈࡢせᮃࡼࡾ㏣ຍࡉࢀࡓ㸬 ࡲࡓศᯒ⤖ᯝࡽᮇ㛫ࢥࢫࢺไ⣙ࡼࡾ࡚ࡢᶵ⬟ࡢᐇࡀ㞴ࡋ࠸ࡇࡀศࡾ㸪 ୍㒊ࡢᶵ⬟ࢆḟࣂ࣮ࢪࣙࣥ⛣⾜ࡋࡓ㸬ࡉࡽ㸪タィࣇ࢙࣮ࢬ࡛ࡣせ௳ᐃ⩏࣑ࢫࢆⓎ ぢࡋせ௳ᐃ⩏ࡢࡸࡾ┤ࡋసᴗࡸ㸪ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢ㐃ᦠタィ࡛ࡣࢩࢫࢸ࣒㛤Ⓨ㐍ᤖࡢ㐜 ࢀࡼࡾ㐃ᦠ㒊ศࡢᐇࢆᚋࡍࡿ➼ࡼࡾィ⏬ࡣኚ᭦ࡉࢀࡓ㸬ᐇࣇ࢙࣮ࢬ࡛ࡣせ ௳ᐃ⩏࣑ࢫࡸタィ࣑ࢫࡼࡿࡸࡾ┤ࡋసᴗࡀⓎ⏕ࡋ㸪ࢸࢫࢺࣇ࢙࣮ࢬ࡛ࡣᛶ⬟ࢸࢫࢺ ⤖ᯝᇶ࡙ࡁタィࡢࡸࡾ┤ࡋసᴗࡀⓎ⏕ࡋࡓࡀᅗ㸯࡛࠶ࡿ㸬 ࡇࡢࡼ࠺㢳ᐈࡢせᮃኚ᭦㸪ࢩࢫࢸ࣒㛵㐃࡞ࡼࡾ᪂ࡓⓎ⏕ࡋࡓ⣽࡞ࣉࣟ ࢭࢫࡀࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡣ⡆༢࡞ᵝ᭩ࡢಟṇ సᴗࡽࡦࡘࡢᶵ⬟ࢆタィ࣭ᐇ࣭ࢸࢫࢺ࡞ࡢࡁ࡞సᴗ➼㸪ᵝࠎ࡞⢏ᗘࡀᏑᅾ ࡍࡿࡀ㸪ࡇࡇ࡛ࡣᙜึィ⏬࡞࠸࡚ࡢ୍㐃ࡢసᴗࢆࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡍࡿ㸬 3.2 PC ್ࡢィ ᪉ἲ Process Complexity ࢆᐃ⩏ࡍࡿ㝿ࡢ᪉㔪ࢆ௨ୗ♧ࡍ㸬. N (t ). PC ( t ) = ( Num _ dev ( t ) i × L( t ) i × term ( t ) i ) i =1. ࣭࣭࣭ 㸦㸯㸧. PC(t):. ้ t ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉ㸦้ 0㹼t ࡲ࡛ࡢ⤊ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡶྵࡴ㸧. N(t):. ้ t ࡢ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆྵࡴࣉࣟࢭࢫ⥲ᩘ㸦้ 0㹼t ࡲ࡛ࡢ⤊ࣉ ࣟࢭࢫࡶྵࡴ㸧㸬. Num_dev(t)i:. ้ t ࡢ i ␒┠ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࢃࡿ㛤Ⓨ⪅ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉᩘ㸬. L(t)i:. ้ t ࡢ i ␒┠ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢྠᐇ⾜ࣉࣟࢭࢫᩘ㸬. term(t)i:. ้ t ࡢ i ␒┠ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᐇ⾜ᮇ㛫ࡢయ㛤Ⓨᮇ㛫ᑐࡍࡿྜ㸬ࡘࡲ ࡾ㸪1.0 ㏆࠸ሙྜࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᐇ⾜ᮇ㛫ࡀࡰ㛤Ⓨᮇ㛫యࢃࡓࡿ㸬. ᥦࡍࡿ PC ್ࡢࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱࡣ㸪Num_dev(t)i ࡀ้ t ࡢ i ␒┠ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࢃࡿ 㛤Ⓨ⪅ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉᩘ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪L(t)i ࡣ้ t ࡢ i ␒┠ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫྠᐇ⾜ࡍࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫᩘ㸪 term(t)i ࡣ้ t ࡢ i ␒┠ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺయࡢ㛤Ⓨᮇ㛫ᑐࡍࡿᐇ⾜ᮇ㛫ࡢ ྜࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡽᢳฟ࡛ࡁࡿせ⣲ࡢ࠺ࡕ㸪Num_dev(t)i ࡢ㛤Ⓨ⪅ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉᩘ ࡣ୍ࡘࡢసᴗࢆ」ᩘே࡛ᢸᙜࡍࡿࡇ࡛ᕤᩘࡀቑ࠼ࡿ㸦ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ」㞧࡞ ࡿ㸧࠸࠺ほⅬࡽ㑅ᢥࡋࡓ㸬L(t)i ࡢྠᐇ⾜ࡍࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫᩘ term(t)i ࡢᐇ⾜ᮇ㛫ࡣ సᴗ㛫ࡢྠᮇ(ࢥ࣑ࣗࢽࢣ࣮ࢩࣙࣥ)ࢆࡿࡇࡢ㞴ࡋࡉࡼࡾ㑅ᢥࡋࡓ㸬㑅ᢥࡉࢀࡓ㸱 せ⣲ࡣ࠾࠸┦ⓗᙳ㡪ࢆ࠼ࡿ್࡛࠶ࡿࡢ࡛㸪ࡑࢀࡒࢀࢆ⟬ࡋࡓ㸬 ྛせ⣲ࢆヲࡋࡃㄝ᫂ࡍࡿ㸬㛤Ⓨ⪅ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉᩘ Num_dev(t)i ࡢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ⢏ᗘࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫ ࡢ⢏ᗘ౫Ꮡࡍࡿ㸬࠼ࡤ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫྵࡲࢀࡿసᴗࡢ⢏ᗘࡀ᪥༢࡛࠶ࡿ Num_dev(t)i ࡢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ⢏ᗘࡣே༢ࡀ┦ᙜ⪃࠼ࡿ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪᪥༢ࡢసᴗィ⏬࡛⟶ ⌮ࡍࡿࡢࡣ㛤Ⓨ⪅ẖࡢ⟶⌮ࡀ㐺ᙜ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ྠᵝ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫྵࡲࢀࡿసᴗ⢏ᗘࡀ㐌 ༢࡛࠶ࡿ㸪Num_dev(t)i ࡢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ⢏ᗘࡣࢳ࣮࣒༢ࡀ┦ᙜ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬⤌⧊ࡢᕤ⛬⟶ ⌮⾲ࡢ⟶⌮༢ࡈ Num_dev(t)i ࡢࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ⢏ᗘࡀỴᐃࡉࢀࡿ㸬୍᪉㸪term(t)i ࡣࣉࣟ ࢭࢫࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺయ࠼ࡿ㛫ⓗᙳ㡪㔞ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ࡶࡋ㸪࠶ࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᐇ⾜ 㛫ࡀ㠀ᖖ㛗࠸㸪ࡘࡲࡾࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ㛤Ⓨᮇ㛫┦ᙜࡍࡿሙྜ㸪ࡑࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡣ. 3. © 2011 Information Processing Society of Japan.
(4) ソフトウェアエンジニアリングシンポジウム 2011 ⌧ᅾ. ⌧ᅾ సᴗ. 4/1. 5/1. 6/1. 7/1. 8/1. సᴗ. 9/1. 4/1. 5/1. 6/1. 7/1. 8/1. ࡾ N(t)=4 ࡞ࡿ㸬࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆ i=1㸪㏣ຍࡉࢀࡓࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆ i=2,3,4 ࡍࡿ㸪้ t ࡀ㸴᭶㸯᪥ࡢ PC ್ࡣ௨ୗࡢィ⟬࡞ࡿ㸬 ձ i=1(࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫ) (i) Num_dev(t)_1=3 (ii) L(t)_1=4 (iii) term(t)_1=180/180=1.0 ղ i=2(ᅗ୰ࡢ D ࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫ) (i) Num_dev(t)_2=1 (ii) L(t)_2=4 (iii) term(t)_2=30/180=0.166 ճ i=3(ᅗ୰ࡢ E ࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫ) (i) Num_dev(t)_3=1 (ii) L(t)_3=4 (iii) term(t)_3=45/180=0.25 մ i=4(ᅗ୰ࡢ D ࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫ) (i) Num_dev(t)_4=1 (ii) L(t)_4=4 (iii) term(t)_4=60/180=0.333 ᚑࡗ࡚㸪࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸱ࡘࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ㏣ຍࡉࢀࡓࣉࣟࢭࢫ」㞧 ࡉࡣ㸪PC(t)=12.000+0.664+1.000+1.332=14.996 ࡞ࡿ㸬 3.4 PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢᥦ PC ್ࡣࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࢆィ ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡇࢀࡼࡾ㸪㏣ຍࡉࢀࡓࣇࣛࢢ࣓ ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀࣉࣟࢭࢫయࡢ⛬ᗘᙳ㡪ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࢆุ᩿࡛ࡁࡿ㸬ࡋࡋ㸪PC ್ࡔࡅ࡛ࡣࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢရ㉁ࢆண ࡍࡿࡇࡣ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸㸬ࡑࡇ࡛㸪 PCPQ(Process Complexity - Product Quality)ࣔࢹࣝࢆᥦࡍࡿ㸬PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡣ㸪᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ PC ್㞀 ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ್ࡽᵓ⠏ࡍࡿࡇ࡛㸪ᚋࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺရ㉁ࢆண ࡍࡿࣔࢹ࡛ࣝ࠶ࡿ㸬᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ PC ್ࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ⤊ࡢ PC ್ࡢࡇ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪 㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡣ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋⓎ⏕ࡋࡓ㞀ᐖࡢᩘࡑࡢ㔜せᗘᇶ࡙࠸ࡓࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺရ㉁ ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬PCPQ ࣔࢹ࡛ࣝࡣ㸪X ㍈᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ PC ್㸪Y ㍈㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ್ࡋ㸪㐣ཤࡢ 」ᩘࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ㸰ࡘࡢ್ࢆࣉࣟࢵࢺࡍࡿ㸬ࡇࢀࡼࡾ㸪 PC ್㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ㛵ಀ ࢆ᫂☜࡛ࡁ㸪ࣔࢹࣝᵓ⠏⏝ࡋ࡞ࡗࡓࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ PC ್ࡽ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢ 㞀ᐖࢆண ࡍࡿࣔࢹ࡛ࣝ࠶ࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪ᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡸ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢ㞀ᐖ⟶⌮᪉ἲࡀ⤌⧊ ࡈ␗࡞ࡿࡓࡵ㸪⤌⧊ࡈࡢ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆసᡂࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿ㸬࠼ࡤ㸪࠶ࡿ⤌ ⧊ࡢ⟶⌮⪅ࡣ᪥ẖࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࢆసᡂࡍࡿࡀ㸪ࡢ⤌⧊ࡢ⟶⌮⪅ࡣ㐌༢ࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮ ⾲ࢆసᡂࡍࡿ㸬ᥦࡍࡿ PC ್ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ⢏ᗘࡣᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡢ⢏ᗘ౫Ꮡࡍࡿࡢ࡛㸪 ⤌⧊ࡈࡢ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝ࡞ࡿ㸬ྠ㞀ᐖ⟶⌮᪉ἲࡶ⤌⧊ࡈ␗࡞ࡿ㸬≉㸪㞀. 9/1. A. A B. ࣮࣋ࢫ. B. C. ࣉࣟࢭࢫ. C D E F. 4 ᭶ 1 ᪥⌧ᅾࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲. ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺ ࣉࣟࢭ ࢫ. 6 ᭶ 1 ᪥⌧ᅾࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮. ᅗ 2 ᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡽࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺᢳฟ Figure 2 Extracting fragment process from configuration of a workflow management table ࡁࡃࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺయᙳ㡪ࢆཬࡰࡍ㸬ᑐࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᐇ⾜㛫ࡀ 1 ᪥⛬ᗘ࡞ࡽ㸪 ࡑࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᑠࡉ࠸⪃࠼ࡿ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ከࡃࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ Ⓨ⏕ࡋ㸪ྛࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᐇ⾜ᮇ㛫ࡀ㛗ࡃ㸪ྛࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ୪⾜ᐇ⾜ࡉࢀࡓሙྜ㸪PC ್ࡣ ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ㸬㏫㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢⓎ⏕ࡀᑡ࡞ࡃ㸪ྛࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᐇ⾜ᮇ㛫ࡀ▷ࡃ㸪ྛࣉࣟࢭ ࢫࡀ୪⾜ᐇ⾜ࡉࢀ࡞࠸ሙྜ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢᙳ㡪ࡣᑠࡉ࠸⪃࠼ࡿ 3.3 ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᢳฟ᪉ἲ PC ್ࡢィ PC ್ࡣᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲グ㍕ࡉࢀࡓ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫᇶ࡙ࡁ ィ ࡍࡿ㸬ᅗ㸰ᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡢࡽࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᢳฟ᪉ἲࢆ♧ࡍ㸬⾲ࡢ ᶓ㍈ࡣ᪥㸪⦪㍈ࡣసᴗ㸦ࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸧ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ᅗ㸰ࡢᕥࡢ⾲ࡣィ⏬ẁ㝵࡚సᡂࡉࢀ ࡓ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࡔࡅࢆ♧ࡋ㸪ྑࡢ⾲ࡣ㸳᭶㸯᪥ணᮇࡏࡠせ௳ࡀ㏣ຍࡉࢀ㸪࣮࣋ࢫ ࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸱ࡘࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ㏣ຍࡉࢀࡓᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ᅗ 㸰ࡢ A㸪B㸪C ࡣ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪D㸪E㸪F ࡣࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆ♧ࡋ࡚ ࠸ࡿ㸬ࡇࡢࡢ㛵ࢃࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ㛤Ⓨ⪅ࡣࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ༢ࡋ㸪࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ SE㸪PG㸪 㢳ᐈࡢ㸱ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ㸪ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡣ PG ࡀ㛵ࢃࡗ࡚࠸ࡓࡍࡿ㸬 ᅗ㸰ࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡽ㸴᭶㸯᪥ࡣ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸱ࡘࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭ ࢫࡀྠᐇ⾜ࡍࡿࡇ࡞ࡿ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ㛤ጞ⌧ẁ㝵ࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡢ ᕪศࡽࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢᢳฟࡸ PC ್ࡢࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱࡢ್ࢆᢳฟࡍࡿࡇࡀ࡛ ࡁࡿ㸬ᮏᥦࡣᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡉ࠼Ꮡᅾࡍࢀࡤࢪࣕࣝ㛤Ⓨࣉࣟࢭࢫ➼ࡢᵝࠎ࡞㛤Ⓨࣉ ࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛ࡶ⏝ྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ྠࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺィ⏬ᙜึࡢ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」 㞧ࡉࡶィ ࡍࡿࡇࡀྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿ㸬 ḟ PC ್ࡢィ ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ᅗ㸰ࡢ࡛ࡣ㸪180 ᪥ࡢ࢛࣮࢘ࢱࣇ࢛࣮ࣝࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸦࣋ ࣮ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸧ࡀ࠶ࡗࡓࡍࡿ㸬ࡇࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫ㏣ຍࣉࣟࢭࢫࡋ࡚㸪ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺ ࣉࣟࢭࢫ D㸪E㸪F ࡀ 30 ᪥㸪45 ᪥㸪60 ᪥ࡢ㏣ຍసᴗࡀⓎ⏕ࡋࡓ௬ᐃࡍࡿ㸬ࡇࡢẁ㝵 ࡛ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࣥࢫࢱࣥࢫᩘࡣ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸯ࡘࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ㸱ࡘ࡞. 4. © 2011 Information Processing Society of Japan.
(5) ソフトウェアエンジニアリングシンポジウム 2011. 4. PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢ㐺⏝ 4.1 㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ㐺⏝ PC ್ࢆ⏘ᴗ⏺ࡢ㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ㸦⾲㸯ཧ↷㸧࡚ィ ࡋࡓ㸬ࡇࢀࡽࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ ࡣᩍ⫱⣔ࡢࣉࣜࢣ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢆᑓ㛛㛤Ⓨࡍࡿྠ୍⤌⧊ࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬㸴ࣉ ࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡶྠ୍⤌⧊ࡼࡿᏛࡢᩍ⫱⣔ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢ㛤Ⓨ࡛࠶ࡿࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ C ࡣ᪂つ㛤Ⓨ࡛࠶ࡿࡀ㸪ࡑࢀ௨እࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡣẕయࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢࣂ ࣮ࢪࣙࣥࢵࣉ࡛࠶ࡗࡓ㸬 4.2 㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ PC ್ࡢ᥎⛣ ᅗ㸱㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ PC ್ࡢ᥎⛣ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬᭱ࡶ㧗࠸ PC ್ࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡢ 44.4 ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪᭱ࡶప࠸್ࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ F ࡢ 15.4 ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡋࡓࡀࡗ࡚㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡣከࡃࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆྵࡴ」㞧࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛࠶ࡿࡇࡀࢃࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ ࢙ࢡࢺ F ࡣࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀᑡ࡞࠸ࢩࣥࣉࣝ࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛࠶ࡿࡇࡀࢃࡿ㸬 ࡲࡓ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࡣ᪂つ㛤Ⓨࢩࢫࢸ࣒࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ḟ࠸࡛ PC ್ ࡀ㧗࠸ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬㛤Ⓨ⪅ࡢࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗࡼࡿ㸪㢳ᐈࡀ᪂ࡋ࠸ࢩࢫࢸ ࣒ࢆ᪩ᮇ࣓࣮ࢪࡍࡿࡇࡀ㞴ࡋࡃ㸪㢳ᐈࡢせồࡀ㢖⦾ኚ᭦ࡉࢀ㸪㏣ຍసᴗࡀከ ࡃ࡞ࡗࡓ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪せồኚ᭦ࡼࡾ㏣ຍసᴗࡀከࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢቑ ຍࡘ࡞ࡀࡗࡓ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿ㸬ྠᵝࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ C ࡶ᪂つ㛤Ⓨࢩࢫࢸ࣒࡛࠶ࡾ㸪㢳 ᐈࡣࢩࣥࣉࣝ࡞ GUI ࢆせᮃࡋࡓࡀ㸪㛤Ⓨ⪅ࡀ࣓࣮ࢪ࡛ࡁࡎ㸪⤖ᯝࣉࣟࢺࢱࣉࢆస ᡂࡍࡿࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀⓎ⏕ࡋࡓ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪ࢸࢫࢺᕤ⛬࡛ࡣࢿࢵࢺ࣮࣡ࢡ࢚࣮ࣛ ࡼࡿࢿࢵࢺ࣮࣡ࢡࢳ࣮ࣗࢽࣥࢢࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ➼ࡼࡾ PC ್ ࡀቑຍࡋࡓ㸬ࡑࢀᑐࡋ࡚㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ B ࡣࡍ࡛✌ാࡋ࡚࠸ࡿẕయࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢࣂ ࣮ࢪࣙࣥࢵࣉ࡛࠶ࡗࡓ㸬㢳ᐈࡶẕయࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࢆ⇍▱ࡋ㸪㏣ຍࡍࡿᶵ⬟ࡢ࣓࣮ࢪࡶ ᢕᥱࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡓࡵせồኚ᭦ࡀ㢖⦾ࡉࢀࡿࡇࡣ࡞ࡗࡓ㸬⤖ᯝࡋ࡚㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡ ࢺ B ࡛ࡣ 15 㐌┠ࡢ࿘㎶୍࡛ⓗ PC ್ࡀቑຍࡍࡿࡀ㸪యࡋ࡚ప࠸್ࢆ⥔ᣢ࡛ࡁ ࡓ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡣẕయࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢࣂ࣮ࢪࣙࣥࢵࣉ࡛࠶ࡗࡓ ࡀ㸪PC ್ࡣ㛤Ⓨᮇ㛫ࢆ㏻ࡋ࡚ᖖ㧗ࡗࡓ㸬㛤Ⓨ⪅ࡢࣥࢱࣅ࣮ࣗࡼࢀࡤ㸪ࣉࣟ ࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡣ๓ࣂ࣮ࢪࣙࣥࡢࢩࢫࢸ࣒ከࡃࡢ㞀ᐖࡀⓎ⏕ࡋ㸪ࡑࡢ㞀ᐖᑐᛂࣉࣟࢪ ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡛ᮏ᮶ᐇࡍࡁ㛤Ⓨసᴗࡢྠ㐍⾜ࡀ⾜ࢃࢀࡓ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ィ⏬ࡉࢀࡓ᪂つ ᶵ⬟ࡢ㛤Ⓨࢆ⾜࠸࡞ࡀࡽ㸪ከࡃࡢ㞀ᐖᑐᛂ࠸࠺ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀⓎ⏕ࡋࡓࡇ ࡞ࡿ㸬⤖ᯝࡋ࡚㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡢ PC ್ࡣᖖ㧗࠸್ࢆ♧ࡋࡓ㸬ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡ ࢺ E ࡣẕయࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢࣜࣇࢡࢱࣜࣥࢢࡀ࡞㛤Ⓨ࡛࠶ࡗࡓ㸬ࡋࡓࡀࡗ࡚㸪᪂ࡓ࡞ᶵ ⬟㛤Ⓨࢆ⾜ࢃࡎࣜࣇࢡࢱࣜࣥࢢ㞟୰ࡋࡓࡓࡵ㸪PC ್ࡀẚ㍑ⓗపࡃ࡞ࡗࡓ⪃࠼ࡽ ࢀࡿ㸬ࡑࡢᚋࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ F ࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ E ࡛ᐇணᐃ࡛࠶ࡗࡓᶵ⬟ࡢ㛤Ⓨ࡛࠶ࡗ ࡓࡓࡵ㸪ᶵ⬟ෆᐜࡸ㢳ᐈࡢពᛮࢆ࡞ࡾ⇍▱ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ࡲࡓẕయࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡶᏳᐃࡋ࡚ ࠸ࡓࡓࡵయࢆ㏻ࡋ࡚ PC ್ࡣప࠸್ࢆ⥔ᣢࡋࡓ㸬. ᅗ 3 㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ PC ್ࡢ᥎⛣ Figure 3 Changes of values of process complexities (moment version) of 6 projects ᐖࡢ㔜せᗘࡣ⤌⧊ࡼࡗุ࡚᩿ࡀ␗࡞ࡿ㸬࠼ࡤ㸪ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࢲ࢘ࣥࡀ᭱ࡶ῝้࡞㞀ᐖ ุ᩿ࡍࡿ⤌⧊ᑐࡋ࡚㸪せ௳ᐃ⩏࢚࣮ࣛࡀ᭱ࡶ῝้࡞㞀ᐖุ᩿ࡍࡿ⤌⧊ࡶ࠶ࡿ㸬 ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲࡛ࡢ⟶⌮᪉ἲࡸ㞀ᐖࡢ㔜せᗘࡢ⟶⌮᪉ἲࡶ⤌⧊ࡼࡗ࡚␗࡞ࡿࡢ ࡛㸪ᮏࣔࢹࣝࡣ⤌⧊ࡈᵓ⠏ࡉࢀࡿ㸬ࡓࡔࡋ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆᵓ⠏ࡍࡿࡣ⤌⧊ẖ࡛ ᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲ࡢ⟶⌮᪉ἲࢆ⤫୍ࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿ㸬PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡣ᪂つࡢࣉ ࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ㐍⾜㏵୰㸪ᐃᮇⓗ PC ್ࢆィ ࡋ㐣ཤࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡽᵓ⠏ࡉࢀࡓ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆ⏝࠸ࡿࡇ࡛㸪࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢ㞀ᐖࢆண ࡍࡿࣔࢹ࡛ࣝ࠶ࡿ㸬PCPQ ࣔࢹ ࣝࡣ௨ୗࡢᡭ㡰࡛ᵓ⠏ࡉࢀࡿ㸬 Step1㸸 ྠ୍⤌⧊࡛⤊ࡋࡓ」ᩘࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲ࢆ ‽ഛࡍࡿ㸬 Step2㸸 ྛࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ PC ್ࢆィ ࡍࡿ㸬 Step3㸸 㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲ࡽ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢ㞀ᐖࡢ㔜せᗘࢆỴᐃࡍࡿ㸬 Step4㸸 ྛࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࢆィ⟬ࡍࡿ㸬 Step5㸸 X ㍈ PC ್㸪Y ㍈㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ್ࢆࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡈࣉࣟࢵࢺࡋ㸪 ࡑࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺࢆ⤖ࡪ㏆ఝ⥺ࢆồࡵࡿ㸬 ୖグࡢᡭ㡰࡛ồࡵࡽࢀࡓ㏆ఝ⥺ࡀ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝ࡞ࡿ㸬ḟ❶࡚ᐇ㝿ࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡ ࢺࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢᵓ⠏ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬 ⾲ 1 㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢヲ⣽ Table 1 Details of 6 projects. ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺྡ 㛤Ⓨᮇ㛫 ࢩࢫࢸ࣒✀㢮 A 㸷ࣨ᭶ ᩍ⫱࣏࣮ࢱࣝWebࣉࣜࢣ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢩࢫࢸ࣒ B 㸵ࣨ᭶ ᩍ⫱࣏࣮ࢱࣝWebࣉࣜࢣ࣮ࢩࣙࣥࢩࢫࢸ࣒ C 㸴ࣨ᭶ ࢡࣛࣥࢺࢧ࣮ࣂࡢᤵᴗᨭࢩࢫࢸ࣒ D E. 㸴ࣨ᭶. ࢡࣛࣥࢺࢧ࣮ࣂࡢᤵᴗᨭࢩࢫࢸ࣒. 㸴ࣨ᭶. ࢡࣛࣥࢺࢧ࣮ࣂࡢᤵᴗᨭࢩࢫࢸ࣒. F. 㸴ࣨ᭶. ࢡࣛࣥࢺࢧ࣮ࣂࡢᤵᴗᨭࢩࢫࢸ࣒. 5. © 2011 Information Processing Society of Japan.
(6) ソフトウェアエンジニアリングシンポジウム 2011. 㻝㻜㻜 㻥㻜 㻤㻜 㻣㻜 㻢㻜 㻡㻜 㻠㻜 㻟㻜 㻞㻜 㻝㻜 㻜. 㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡼࡿ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢᵓ⠏ࢆ௨ୗ♧ࡍ㸬 Step1㸸 ྠ୍⤌⧊ෆࡢ⤊ࡋࡓ㸴ࡘࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲ࢆ⏝ ពࡍࡿ㸬 Step2㸸 㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ᭱⤊ࡢ PC ್ࢆィ ࡍࡿ㸬⾲㸰᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ PC ್ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬 Step3㸸 ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢ㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲ࡽ㸪ྛ㞀ᐖࡢ㔜せᗘࢆỴᐃࡍࡿ㸬⾲㸰 5 ẁ㝵ࣛ ࣥࢡ㸦SS㸪S㸪A㸪B㸪C㸧ࡢ㔜せᗘࢆຍࡉࢀࡓ㞀ᐖࡢ௳ᩘࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ࡇࡢ⤌ ⧊࡛ࡣ SS ࣛࣥࢡࡣࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࢲ࢘ࣥࣞ࣋ࣝࡢ㞀ᐖࢆពࡋ㸪S ࣛࣥࢡࡣ㔜せ ࡞ᶵ⬟ࡢḞዴࡸᛶ⬟ၥ㢟ࢆពࡍࡿ㸬A ࣛࣥࢡࡣ୰⛬ᗘࡢ㔜せ࡞ᶵ⬟࡛ࡢၥ 㢟㸪B ࣛࣥࢡࡣ࣮ࣘࢨࣥࢱࣇ࢙࣮ࢫࡢၥ㢟㸪C ࣛࣥࢡࡣ㸪࣓ࢵࢭ࣮ࢪࡸྡ ⛠ࡢၥ㢟ࢆពࡍࡿ㸬ྛ㞀ᐖࡣ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢ㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲࡛⟶⌮ࡉࢀ㸪ྛ㞀ᐖ ࡢ㔜せᗘࡣ⟶⌮⪅㢳ᐈ࡚Ỵᐃࡉࢀࡓ㸬 Step4㸸 㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࢆィ ࡍࡿ㸬㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡣ㞀ᐖ௳ᩘ㔜せᗘࡢ✚⟬࡛ồࡵࡿ㸬࠼ࡤ㸪 SS ࢆ㸳㸪S ࢆ㸲㸪A ࢆ㸱㸪B ࢆ㸰㸪C ࢆ㸯ࡢᐃᩘタᐃࡍࡿ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡ ࢺ A ࡢ㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡣ 5*4 + 4*4 + 3*6 +2*9 +1*11=83 ࡞ࡿ㸦⾲㸰㞀ᐖẚ㔜ཧ↷㸧㸬 ྠᵝ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ B ࡣ 66㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ C ࡣ 82㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡣ 88㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ E ࡣ 37㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ F ࡣ 28 ࡞ࡿ㸬 Step5㸸 ྛࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ᭱⤊ࡢ PC ್㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ㛵ಀࢆࣉࣟࢵࢺࡍࡿ㸬ᅗ㸲㸪 㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ㸰ࡘࡢ್ࡢ㛵ಀࢆࣉࣟࢵࢺࡋ㸪ࡑࢀࡽࢆ⤖ࡪ㏆ఝ⥺ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬 ᅇ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆᵓ⠏ࡋࡓ⤌⧊ࡢ㏆ఝ⥺ࡣ௨ୗࡢᘧ࡞ࡿ㸬 y = −0.0105X3 + 0.9069X2 −22.017X +189.69 ࣭࣭࣭㸦㸰㸧. ⾲ 2 PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝᵓ⠏⏝࠸ࡿ್ Table 2 Parameter values of a PCPQ model 㞀ᐖ⟶⌮ ⾲ࡼࡿ㞀ᐖ ࣞ࣋ࣝ SS A. 43. 83. S 4. A 4. 6. B 9. C 11 13. B. 28. 66. 2. 1. 6. 10. C. 35.4. 82. 2. 3. 19. 1. 1. D E. 44.4 26.3. 88 37. 10 3. 6 3. 4 2. 1 1. 0 2. F. 15.4. 28. 0. 0. 7. 3. 1. 㻯. 㻭. 㻠㻜. 㻮. 㻟㻜 㻞㻜. 䝥䝻䝆䜵䜽䝖㻌㻲. 㻱. 㻝㻜. 㼥㻌㻩㻌㻙㻜㻚㻜㻝㻜㻡㼤㻟㻌㻗㻌㻜㻚㻥㻜㻢㻥㼤㻞㻌㻙㻌㻞㻞㻚㻜㻝㻣㼤㻌㻗㻌㻝㻤㻥㻚㻢㻥 㻾㻞㻌㻩㻌㻜㻚㻥㻝㻟㻤 㻝㻜. 㻞㻜. 㻟㻜. 㻠㻜. 㛫. 㻜 PC್. 㻝. 㻟. 㻡. 㻣. 㻥. 㻝㻝 㻝㻟 㻝㻡 㻝㻣 㻝㻥 㻞㻝 㻞㻟 㻞㻡. 㻡㻜. ᅗ 5 ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ G ࡢ PC ್ࡢኚ Figure 5 Change of process complexity of Project G. ᅇࡢ⤌⧊࡛ࡢ 3&34 ࣔࢹࣝࡢỴᐃಀᩘࡣ ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪᭷ពᛶࡀ㧗࠸ุ ᩿ࡍࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪㏆ఝ⥺ࡢồࡵ᪉ࡣ⤌⧊ẖồࡵ᪉ࢆኚ᭦ࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿ㸬ࡇ ࡢ⤌⧊ࡢ 3&34 ࣔࢹࣝᘧ
(7) ࡣከ㡯ᘧࡀỴᐃಀᩘࡀ㧗ࡗࡓࡀ㸪⤌⧊࡛ࡣ⤌ ⧊ẖ࠶ࡗࡓ㏆ఝ⥺ࢆ᳨ウࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪⤌⧊ẖ࡛ᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡸ 㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲ࡢ⟶⌮⢏ᗘࡢ␗࡞ࡾࡀ࠶ࡿࡓࡵ㸪⥺ᙧ㏆ఝ㸪ᑐᩘ㏆ఝ㸪ᣦᩘ㏆ఝ ࡞ࡢᵝࠎ࡞㏆ఝ⥺ࡢ୰࡛᭱ࡶඃᛶࡢ㧗࠸㏆ఝ⥺ࡢồࡵ᪉ࢆ⏝ࡍࡿ ࡛ 3&34 ࣔࢹࣝ
(8) ࢆồࡵࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿ㸬 4.4 PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆ⏝ࡋࡓࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺရ㉁ࡢண ᅗ㸲ࡢ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆ⏝࠸࡚㸪ࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺရ㉁ࡢண ࢆ⾜࠺㸬 ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ G ࡣྠ୍⤌⧊ෆ࡛ᐇࡉࢀࡓ e-learning ࢩࢫࢸ࣒㛤Ⓨࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛ ࠶ࡿ㸬ࡶࡕࢁࢇ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ G ࡣ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝᵓ⠏࡛⏝ࡋࡓ 6 ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡣ ␗࡞ࡿ⊂❧ࡋࡓࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ G ࡢ PC ್ࡢ᥎⛣ࢆᅗ㸳♧ࡍ㸬 13 㐌┠㸪PC ್ࡣ 25.21 ᛴቑࡋࡓ㸬᪂ࡋ࠸సᴗࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀィ⏬㏣ຍࡉࢀࡓ⪃࠼ ࡽࢀࡿ㸬ࡇࡢ್ࢆᘧ(2)ࡢ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢ x ್㐺⏝ࡍࡿ㸬㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡣ 42.78 ィ⟬ࡉ ࢀࡿ㸬ࡋࡓࡀࡗ࡚㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ G ࡢ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢ㞀ᐖⓎ⏕ࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ E ࡼࡾከ ࡃ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ B ࡼࡾᑡ࡞࠸ࡇࡀண ࡉࢀࡓ㸬 ḟ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ G ࡢ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢ㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲ࡼࡾᐇ㝿ࡢ㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࢆィ ࡋࡓ㸬 ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢ㞀ᐖ௳ᩘࡣ 20 ௳࡛࠶ࡾ㸪SS S ࣛࣥࢡࡢ㞀ᐖࡣ 0 ௳㸪A ࣛࣥࢡࡀ 8 ௳㸪 B ࣛࣥࢡࡀ 9 ௳㸪C ࣛࣥࢡࡀ 3 ௳࡛࠶ࡗࡓ㸬ࡇࢀࡽࡽ㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࢆィ ࡋࡓ⤖ᯝ 45 ࡞ࡗࡓ㸬PCPQ ࣔࢹ࡛ࣝண ࡋࡓ㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡣ 42.78 ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪㏆࠸್࡞ࡗࡓ㸬ᅗ㸲 ࡛ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡋࡓ⟠ᡤࡀ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ G ࡢ᭱⤊ PC ್㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ್ࡢ㛵ಀࡢ⨨࡛ ࠶ࡿ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ G ࡢ 13 㐌┠㸦ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺᮇ㛫ࡣ 25 㐌㸧ࡢⅬ࡛㸪 ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢရ㉁ࡢண ࡀฟ᮶ࡓࡇ࡞ࡿ㸬ࡶࡋ㸪࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢࣉࣟ. ᘧ
(9) ࡀࡇࡢ⤌⧊ࡢ 3&34 ࣔࢹࣝ࡞ࡿ㸬ࡇࡢồࡵࡓ㏆ఝ⥺ࡀ᭷ពࢆุ᩿ ࡍࡿ┠Ᏻࡋ࡚Ỵᐃಀᩘࢆ⏝࠸ࡿ㸬ồࡵࡓ 3&34 ࣔࢹࣝࡢỴᐃಀᩘࡀᑠࡉࡍ ࡂࡿሙྜ㸪ࡇࡢ⤌⧊࡛ࡢ 3&34 ࣔࢹࣝࡣ᭷ពᛶࡀప࠸࠸࠺ุ᩿ࢆᨭࡍࡿ㸬. 㞀ᐖẚ㔜. 䝥䝻䝆䜵䜽䝖㻳. 㻡㻜. 㻰. ᅗ 4 PC ್㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ㏆ఝ⥺ Figure 4 An approximate value curve of relation between process complexities and specific gravities of failures. x: ᭱⤊ࡢ PC ್. ᭱⤊ⓗ ࡞3&್. 㻼㻯್㻌㻙㻌㞀ᐖẚ㔜. 㻜. y: 㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ್. ࣉࣟࢪ ࢙ࢡࢺྡ. PC(t)_accumulate. 㞀ᐖẚ㔜. 4.3 㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡼࡿ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢᵓ⠏. 6. © 2011 Information Processing Society of Japan.
(10) ソフトウェアエンジニアリングシンポジウム 2011. 㻼㻯㻔㼠㻕㼋㼙㼛㼙㼑㼚㼠. 㻠㻜. 㻠㻜. 㻟㻜. 㻟㻜. 㻟㻜. 㻞㻜. 㻞㻜. 㻞㻜. 㻝㻜. 㻝㻜. 㻝㻜. 㻜. 㻜. 㻝. 㻢. 㻝㻝. 㻝㻢. 䝥䝻䝆䜵䜽䝖D. 㻝. 㻞㻝. 㻢. 㻝㻝. 㻝㻢. 㻞㻝. 㐌. 䝥䝻䝆䜵䜽䝖E. 㐌 㻼㻯㻔㼠㻕㼋㼙㼛㼙㼑㼚㼠. 㻼㻯㻔㼠㻕㼋㼙㼛㼙㼑㼚㼠. 㻜 㻝. 㻠㻜. 㻟㻜. 㻟㻜. 㻟㻜. 㻞㻜. 㻞㻜. 㻞㻜. 㻝㻜. 㻝㻜. 㻝㻜. 㻢. 㻝㻝. 㻝㻢. 䝥䝻䝆䜵䜽䝖C. 㻞㻝. 㐌. 㻝㻝. 㻝㻢. 㻞㻝. 䝥䝻䝆䜵䜽䝖F. 㐌. 㻠㻜. 㻜. 㻜. 㻝. 㻢. 㻼㻯㻔㼠㻕㼋㼙㼛㼙㼑㼚㼠. 㻠㻜. 㻜. ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡢ▐㛫 PC ್ࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺᮇ㛫୰࠾࠸࡚ᖖ㧗࠸್ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ࡘ ࡲࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡢ㛤Ⓨᮇ㛫୰㸪ከࡃࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡣ୪⾜ᐇ⾜ࡉ ࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡀศࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A㸪B㸪E ࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ⤊ྥࡅ࡚▐ 㛫 PC ್ࡀῶᑡࡋ࡚࠸ࡿᵝᏊࡀぢཷࡅࡽࢀࡿࡀ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ C㸪D ࡣ▐㛫 PC ್ࡀ ᮰ࡏࡎቑຍഴྥࡢࡲࡲࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ⤊ࢆ㏄࠼࡚࠸ࡿࡀࢃࡿ㸬㏻ᖖࡣࣉࣟࢪ࢙ ࢡࢺ⤊ྥࡅ࡚ከࡃࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ⤊ࡋ㸪▐㛫 PC ್ࡀῶᑡഴྥࢆ♧ࡍࡶ㛵ࢃࡽ ࡎ㸪▐㛫 PC ್ࡀቑຍഴྥ࡛ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ⤊ࢆ㏄࠼ࡓ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ୰ ㏣ຍసᴗ➼ࡀ᮰ࡏࡎ⣡ᮇࢆ㏄࠼ࡓࡇࡀண࡛ࡁࡿ㸬⾲㸰ࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ C㸪D ࡢ 㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ್ࡶࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺẚ࡚ࡁࡃ㸪▐㛫 PC ್ࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ⤊ ࡢῶᑡഴྥࡲࡓࡣቑຍഴྥࡽࡶ᭱⤊ࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢရ㉁ࢆண ࡍࡿࡇࡶྍ⬟⪃࠼ ࡿ㸬 5.2 ྍどࢶ࣮ࣝ ▐㛫 PC ್ࡢ᥎⛣ࢆྍどࡍࡿࢶ࣮ࣝࢆసᡂࡋࡓ㸬ᅗ㸵ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A㸪D㸪E ࡢ ▐㛫 PC ್ࡢྍど⤖ᯝࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ྍど࡛ࡣࡦࡘࡢࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆࡦࡘ ࡢࣈࣟࢵࢡࡋ࡚⾲⌧ࡍࡿ㸬ࡦࡘࡢࣈࣟࢵࢡࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࢀࡤ」㞧࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢྍ⬟ ᛶࡀ࠶ࡾ㸪㏫ᑠࡉ࡞ࣈࣟࢵࢡࡣ」㞧࡛࡞࠸ࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ᅗ㸵ࡢ X ㍈ࡣ้ࢆ♧ ࡋ㸪Y ㍈ࡣᘧ(3)ࡢ L(t)ࡢ್ࢆ♧ࡋ㸪Z ㍈ࡣᘧ(3)ࡢ Nun_dev(t)ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪X ㍈᪉ྥ 㛗࠸ࣈࣟࢵࢡࡣᐇ⾜ᮇ㛫ࡢ㛗࠸ࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪Y ㍈᪉ྥ㛗࠸ࣈࣟࢵࢡࡣ୪⾜ᐇ ⾜ࡍࡿࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀከ࠸ࡇࢆ♧ࡋ㸪Z ㍈᪉ྥ㛗࠸ࣈࣟࢵࢡࡣከࡃࡢ㛤Ⓨࢢ࣮ࣝ ࣉࡀ㛵ࡍࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆពࡍࡿ㸬ࡲࡓⰍࡣྠࡌసᴗࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪⤊ࡋࡓసᴗࡀ ᗘ㏣ຍసᴗࡋ࡚㏣ຍࡉࢀࡓ➼ࡶᢕᥱྍ⬟࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬 ྍどࢶ࣮ࣝࡽࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࡢᚋ༙࡛ࡣከࡃࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀⓎ⏕ࡋࡓࡇࡀศ ࡿ㸬ࡋࡋ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࡣ X ㍈᪉ྥࡣ▷࠸ࣈࣟࢵࢡࡀከ࠸㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ྠᐇ⾜ ࡍࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࡣከ࠸ࡀ㸪ಶࠎࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡣẚ㍑ⓗࡍࡄ⤊ࢃࡿసᴗ࡛࠶ࡿࡇࡀࢃ ࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࡢࣈࣟࢵࢡࡣ Y ㍈᪉ྥከࡃ✚ࡳ㔜࡞ࡗ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ ࢡࢺ D,E ẚ࡚୪⾜ᐇ⾜ࡍࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀከ࠸㸬ࡇࡢࡼ࠺㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡈࡢࣉ ࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࡢ≉ᚩࢆ⾲⌧࡛ࡁࡿࢶ࣮࡛ࣝ࠶ࡿ㸬 5.3 ▐㛫 PC ್㞀ᐖࡢ㔜せᗘ ▐㛫 PC ್Ⓨ⏕ࡋࡓ㞀ᐖࡢ㔜せᗘࡢ㛵ಀࡘ࠸࡚⪃ᐹࡍࡿ㸬ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࣉ ࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡣ୧⪅ࡶ⣼✚ࡢ PC ್ࡀ㧗ࡃ㸪㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ್ࡶࡁ࠸㸦⾲㸰ཧ↷㸧㸬ఝ ࡓࡼ࠺࡞ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ≉ᚩࢆᣢࡘ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࡀ㸪ᅗ㸵♧ࡍࡼ࠺㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ 」㞧࡞ࡗࡓせᅉࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ✀㢮ࡀ␗࡞ࡿ㸬ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࡣ⣽࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀከ ࡃⓎ⏕ࡋࡓࡢᑐࡋ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡣẚ㍑ⓗᮇ㛫ࡢ㛗࠸ࡁ࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀⓎ⏕ࡋࡓ㸬 ≉㸪ࡦࡘࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ Z ㍈᪉ྥ㛗࠸ࡢࡀ≉ᚩ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪ࡦࡘࡢࣉࣟࢭ ࢫ」ᩘࡢ㛤Ⓨࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡀࢃࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀⓎ⏕ࡋࡓ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿ㸬ࡶ PC ್ ࡀࡁ࠸ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛࠶ࡿࡀ㸪ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ≉ᚩࡀ␗࡞ࡿ㸬. 㻼㻯㻔㼠㻕㼋㼙㼛㼙㼑㼚㼠. 㻼㻯㻔㼠㻕㼋㼙㼛㼙㼑㼚㼠. 㻠㻜. 㻝. 㻢. 㻝㻝. 㻝㻢. 㻞㻝. 㻞㻢. 䝥䝻䝆䜵䜽䝖A. 㻟㻝. 㻟㻢. 㐌. 㻝. 㻢. 㻝㻝. 㻝㻢. 䝥䝻䝆䜵䜽䝖B. 㻞㻝. 㻞㻢. 㐌. ᅗ 6 㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ▐㛫 PC ್ࡢ᥎⛣ Figure 6 Changes of values of process complexities (moment) of 6 projects ࢲࢡࢺရ㉁ࢆࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ E ⛬ᗘྥୖࡉࡏࡓ࠸࡞ࡽࡤ㸪13 㐌┠ィ⏬ࡉࢀࡓ㏣ຍస ᴗࡢぢ┤ࡋ➼ࡼࡿィ⏬ࡢタィࢆᐇࡍࡿ➼㸪⟶⌮సᴗࡢ┠Ᏻ࡞ࡿ㸬. 5. ⪃ᐹ 5.1 ▐㛫 PC ್. PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢ PC ್ࡣ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢࡍ࡚ࡢ⣼✚ࡽ ィ ࡋࡓ㸬ࡇࢀࡼࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢほⅬࡽࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢရ㉁ࢆண ࡋ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ యࡢ≉ᚩࢆ♧ࡍࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡓ㸬ࡋࡋ㸪㸯ࡘࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ㐍⾜୰࠾࠸࡚ࡶࣉࣟ ࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࡣ㝶ኚࡍࡿ㸬࠼ࡤ㸪๓ࣂ࣮ࢪࣙࣥࡢࢩࢫࢸ࣒㞀ᐖࡀⓎ⏕ࡋ㞀ᐖ ᑐᛂసᴗࡀᛴ㑉㏣ຍࡉࢀࡓᮇࡣ୍ⓗ PC ್ࡀቑຍࡍࡿࡀ㸪㞀ᐖᑐᛂࡀ᮰ࡍࡿ PC ್ࡣඖᡠࡿ㸬ࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ PC ್ࡢ⣔ิኚࢆ♧ࡍ▐㛫 PC ್ࢆ௨ୗ♧ࡍ㸬. PC( t ) _ moment =. N ( t _ moment ). ( Num _ dev i =1. (t )i. × L( t ) i × term( t ) i ). ࣭࣭࣭㸦㸱㸧. PC(t)_moment:. ้ t ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉ㸦⤊ࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆྵࡲ࡞࠸㸧. N(t_moment):. ้ t ࡢ✌ാ୰ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫ⥲ᩘ㸦⤊ࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆྵࡲ࡞࠸㸧. ᇶᮏⓗ PC(t)ྠࡌᘧ࡛࠶ࡿࡀ㸪ࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱ N(t_moment)ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ⥲ᩘ⤊ࡋࡓ ࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆྵࡲ࡞࠸㸬ࡘࡲࡾ㸪้ t ✌ാࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࡔࡅࢆᑐ㇟ィ ࡍࡿ㸬 ࡇࢀࡼࡾ㸪⣔ิኚࡍࡿ▐㛫 PC ್ࢆồࡵࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿ㸬 ▐㛫 PC ್ࢆ๓❶ࡢ㸴ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ㐺⏝ࡋࡓ⤖ᯝࢆᅗ㸴♧ࡍ㸬ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A. 7. © 2011 Information Processing Society of Japan.
(11) ソフトウェアエンジニアリングシンポジウム 2011 ࣝࢆసᡂࡍࡿࡇ࡛㸪࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ㞀ᐖࡢ✀㢮ࢆண ࡛ࡁࡿྍ⬟ᛶࡶ♧၀࡛ ࡁࡓ㸬ᚋࡣ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆ᭦ホ౯ࡍࡿࡓࡵ㸪ࡢከࡃࡢ⤌⧊࡛ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆ ᵓ⠏ࡋ㸪⤌⧊ࡈࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢ㛵ಀࢆㄪᰝࡍࡿணᐃ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬. Y Y. Y. Z Z. ㅰ㎡ ᮏ◊✲ࡢ୍㒊ࡣᩥ㒊⛉Ꮫ┬⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝ᇶ┙◊✲(C)22500027㸪࠾ࡼࡧᩥ㒊⛉Ꮫ ┬⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝ᇶ┙◊✲(C)21500045 ࡢ⿵ຓࢆཷࡅࡓ㸬. X. Z. ཧ⪃ᩥ⊩. X. X ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A. ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D. 1) Walker Royce.: Software Project Management: A unified Framework, Addison-Wesley Professional, USA(1998). 2) ᾏ㇂ᙪ㸪⃝┤ᖾ㸪㛗⏣㸪ᾏᑼ㈼ : 㢮ఝ᪤Ꮡࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢሗࢆ⏝ࡋࡓせồ⋓ᚓᨭ ࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢ㛤Ⓨホ౯, 㟁Ꮚሗ㏻ಙᏛㄽᩥㄅ, Vol.J93-D, No.10, pp.1836-1850(2010). 3) ୰㇂ከဢᏊ㸪⸨㔝ᘏ : ࣮ࣟࣝ╔┠ࡋࡓࣅࢪࢿࢫ㡿ᇦ࠾ࡅࡿせồ⋓ᚓᡭἲ RODAN ࡢᥦ , ሗฎ⌮Ꮫㄽᩥㄅ, Vol.48, No.8, pp.2534-2550(2007). 4) Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) , http://www.computer.org/portal/web/swebok 5) Humphrey Watts, S.: Managing the software process. Addison-Wesley Professional, USA(1989). 6) ᆏᮏၨྖ㸪⏣୰ᩄᩥ㸪ᴋᮏ┿㸪ᯇᮏ୍㸪⳥㔝 㸸┈ண ᇶ࡙ࡃࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘ࣉࣟࢭ ࢫᨵၿࡢヨࡳ 㸪㟁Ꮚሗ㏻ಙᏛㄽᩥㄅ㸪Vol.J83-D1 㸪No.7 㸪pp.740-748(2000). 7) Cugola, G.: Tolerating Deviations in Process Support Systems via Flexible Enactment of Process Models , IEEE Transaction of Software Engineering, Vol.24, No.11, pp.982-1001(1998). 8) Fuggetta, A. and Ghezzi, C.: State of the art and open issues in process-centered software engineering environments, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol.26, No.1 pp.53-60(1994). 9) Garcia, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: Definition and empirical validation of metrics for software process models. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Product Focused Software Process Improvement, pp.146-158(2004). 10) Kruchten, R.: The Rational Unified Process, Addison-Wesley Professional, USA(2000). 11) Manzoni, L.V., Price, R.T.: Identifying extensions required by RUP (rational unified process) to comply with CMM (capability maturity model) levels 2 and 3, IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering , Vol.29 , No.2, pp.181-192(2003). 12) 㟷ᮌ ಇᶞ㸪ᒣ⏣ ⱱ :ࣉࣟࢭࢫࢹ࣮ࢱᇶ࡙ࡃࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘㛤Ⓨࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢရ㉁ᣦྥᆺ ᐃ㔞ⓗホ౯ἲ㛵ࡍࡿ⪃ᐹ (☜ᐇ࡞≧ἣ࠾ࡅࡿពᛮỴᐃࡢ⌮ㄽᛂ⏝) ᩘ⌮ゎᯒ◊✲ᡤㅮ ✲㘓 ,1589 ,pp215-221(2008) 13) Obana, M. Hanakawa, N. Yoshida N. Iida, H.: Process Fragment Based Process Complexity with Workflow Management Tables. International Workshop on Empirical Software Engineering in Practice, pp.7-12(2010). 14) Bill,Curtis. Girish, V, Seshagiri. Donald, Reifer. Iraj, Hirmanpour and Gargi, Keeni.: The Case for Quantitative Process Management, IEEE Software, vol.25 , No.3, pp.24-28(2008).. ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ E. ᅗ 7 ▐㛫 PC ್ࡢྍど Figure 7 Visualized images of changing process complexities.. ࡑࡇ࡛㸪⾲㸰ࡢⓎ⏕ࡋࡓ㞀ᐖࡢ㔜せᗘ╔┠ࡍࡿ㸬ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࡢ㞀ᐖⓎ⏕௳ᩘ ࡣከ࠸ࡀ㸪SS ࢡࣛࢫ㸦᭱㔜せ㸧ࡢ㞀ᐖࡣ 4 ௳࡛㸪B㸪C ࢡࣛࢫࡢ㞀ᐖࡀ 20 ௳㔜せᗘ ࡢప࠸㞀ᐖࡀከ࠸㸬ᑐࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡛ࡣ SS ࢡࣛࢫࡀ 10 ௳࡛㸪B㸪C ࢡࣛࢫࡀ ࢃࡎ 1 ௳࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡍ࡞ࢃࡕ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ A ࡛ࡣ㞀ᐖ௳ᩘࡣከ࠸ࡀ㍍ᗘ࡞㞀ᐖࡀ ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ D ࡛ࡣ㞀ᐖ௳ᩘࡣከࡃ࡞࠸ࡀ㔜せ࡞㞀ᐖࡀከࡃⓎ⏕ࡋࡓ㸬ࡇࡢ 㞀ᐖࡢ≉ᚩࢆᅗ㸵ẚ㍑ࡍࡿ㸪ᑠࡉ࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀ㔜࡞ࡿሙྜ㸪㍍ᗘ࡞㞀ᐖࡢⓎ⏕ࡀ ከࡃ㸪ࡁ࡞ࣉࣟࢭࢫ㸪≉」ᩘࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡀ㛵ࢃࡿࣉࣟࢭࢫࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜ㸪㔜࡞ 㞀ᐖࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿ㸬ࡇࡢࡼ࠺㸪 PC ್ࡽࡣయࡢ㞀ᐖࡋண ࡛ࡁ࡞ ࠸ࡀ㸪▐㛫 PC ್ࡣⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ㞀ᐖࣞ࣋ࣝࡢ✀㢮ࢆண ࡛ࡁࡿྍ⬟ᛶࡀ࠶ࡿ⪃࠼ࡿ㸬. 6. ࠾ࢃࡾ ᮏ✏࡛ࡣ㸪ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢရ㉁ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡢᵓ⠏ ᪉ἲࢆᥦࡋࡓ㸬PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡣ」ᩘࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࡢ᭱⤊ⓗ࡞ PC ್㞀ᐖẚ㔜ࡢ್ࢆ ⏝ពࡋ㸪ࡑࢀࡽࢆ㏆ఝ⥺ࢆồࡵࡿ࡛ࣔࢹࣝࢆᵓ⠏ࡍࡿ㸬PC ್ࡣྛ⤌⧊ࡢᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ グ㏙ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ࣮࣋ࢫࣉࣟࢭࢫࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡽィ ࡉࢀࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪㞀 ᐖẚ㔜ࡣྛ⤌⧊࡛⏝࠸ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ㞀ᐖ⟶⌮⾲ࡢ㞀ᐖ௳ᩘ㔜せᗘࣞ࣋ࣝࡽ⟬ฟࡉࢀ ࡿ㸬ᕤ⛬⟶⌮⾲ࡢ⟶⌮㡯┠ࡢ⢏ᗘࡸ㞀ᐖࡢ㔜せᗘࣞ࣋ࣝࡢỴࡵ᪉ࡣ⤌⧊ࡈ␗࡞ࡿ ࡀ㸪PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࡣ⤌⧊ẖᵓ⠏ࡉࢀࡿࡓࡵ㸪≉ᐃࡢ⟶⌮᪉ἲ౫Ꮡࡋ࡞࠸ỗ⏝ⓗ࡞ ࣔࢹࣝᵓ⠏᪉ἲ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ᮏᥦࢆ⏘ᴗ⏺࠾ࡅࡿྠ୍⤌⧊ෆࡢ㸵ࡘࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ 㐺⏝ࡋࡓ㸬6 ࡘࡢࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛ PCPQ ࣔࢹࣝࢆᵓ⠏ࡋ㸪ྠ୍⤌⧊ࡢูࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ ࠾࠸࡚ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࡽ࣮ࣜࣜࢫᚋࡢࣉࣟࢲࢡࢺࡢရ㉁ࢆண ࡍࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁ ࡓ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪ࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺᐇ୰ࡢࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ」㞧ࡉࡢ⣔ิኚࢆ♧ࡍ▐㛫 PC ್ࡶ ᥦࡋࡓ㸬ࣇࣛࢢ࣓ࣥࢺࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢ㔜࡞ࡾ᪉ࡸࡁࡉࡀࣅࢪࣗࣝ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿࢶ࣮. 8. © 2011 Information Processing Society of Japan.
(12)
図
関連したドキュメント
This study, as a case study of urban plan system of Pudong large-scale development project in Shanghai, China, examines how land use control has been planned by urban plan system
主として、自己の居住の用に供する住宅の建築の用に供する目的で行う開発行為以外の開
This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project for use in the OpenSSL
In particular, building on results of Kifer 8 and Kallsen and K ¨uhn 6, we showed that the study of an arbitrage price of a defaultable game option can be reduced to the study of
Other important features of the model are the regulation mechanisms, like autoregulation, CO 2 ¼ reactivity and NO reactivity, which regulate the cerebral blood flow under changes
In what follows, we will combine the Hardy-Littlewood k-tuple conjecture with extreme value statistics to better predict the sizes of maximal gaps between prime k-tuples of any
NIST - Mitigating the Risk of Software Vulnerabilities by Adopting a Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF).
12月 米SolarWinds社のIT管理ソフトウェア(orion platform)の