Developmental Pattern of Christian Denominations
著者 Nakabayashi Nobuhiro journal or
publication title
平成11(1999)年度科学研究費補助金 基盤研究 (A)(2)研究成果報告書
volume 1997‑1999
page range 61‑74
year 2001‑03‑01
URL http://doi.org/10.24517/00034844
東アフリカにおける国家主導の社会◎文化変化 と地域的適応に関する動態論的研究
課題番号 0941027
平成9年度〜11年度 科学研究費補助金[基盤研究(A)(2)]
研究成果報告書
平成13年3月
(2001年)
研究代表者 桧園万亀雄
(東京都立大学人文学部教授)
No如血豆roNakabayasi 監anazawaUm豆versi鯉
I. Ineroduction
1.Cbure払amdStatei皿監emya
TheproblemofchurchandstatehastodowithinstitutioJ]Sandthespheresofactionthat
areproperforeach,andthishasbeenapeculiartraditionofthemodernWesternChristianity.
Here the concept of separationis considered to be mostimportant・The state,Or the government,doesnotappointbishopsandpastorsforthechllrChes,andthechurchesdonot
appointpresideiltS,gOVernOfS,andjtidges・Nofeligioiieanbefavoredoverothersorsupported bytaxes・Thestatehasnoroleorauthorityinde銭ningbeliefsrelatingtoGodandworship・
ThispracticewasclearlyseenincolonialKenya(andincolonialA餌caatlarge)inthe late19thcentury andthe early20thcenturyinthefactthatthemissionelmrchescameto
KenyanotonlyfromBritainwhichruledKenyapolitica11y,butalsofromUnitedStatesor
France or any other European countries・The Mission churches scrambled Africa agaln accordingtotheirownloglC,SOtOSPeak,af[ertheEuropeanpowersscrambledit・
The history ofthe church−State relationsinWestern Europe shows alot ofconfLicts
betweenthem・Astothe church−StaterelationsinKenyaitissaidthattherehasbeenlittle
COnaicts,aSOnemainstreamChurchman described・一▼HereinKenyawe standaverygood positionasfaraschurch−Staterelationshipsandco−OPerationareconcerned・Thisco−OPeration
isinaccordancewiththeA血icantraditionalmotto,harambee一(Letuspul1together).Itisin fieldssuchaseducation,medicineandsocialworkinitsvariousformS,andotherrelatedfields,thatchurchandstateinKenyaarenoticeablyco−OPerative・Thisworkingtogetherdidnotonly beganafterKenyagaineditsindependence,butwasalsopresentduringthecolonialerarl・(1)
UnlikeWestEuropeancountrieswherethechurchandthestatehavedifferentorlglnS,
thesetwoinstitutionsinKenyaorlginatedfromoneandthesamesource,thatis,thecolonial SyStem・This perhaps explains the good relationships between themin Kenya.Moreover,
unlike someoftheAfricancountries,therehasbeeIlnOViolent disruptlOnOfgovernment
CauSedbymilitarycoupsorethnicwarsinKenyasofar.Themainstreamchurches,Protestant
AnthropologlCalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya
OrCatholic,havecollectivelycooperatedwiththegovernmentintakingcareofthepeoplein
general■Theseparationofthechurch−StateinKenyamaynotbesoessentialasitassumes.
Thereforein Kenya,SeriotlStrOubleswhichinvolvedChristianchurcheswerenotones betweentheestablishedchurchandthestate,butmostlyonesbetweennewlycreatedchurches OrindependentchurchesoIltheonehandandmainstreamorestablishedchurchesaidedbythe governmentOntheother・
2.Ma塁ns息reamC払ure鮎vs。ImdepemdeI嘘C払ureh−T馳eS鉦Ⅶaせions量m‡sⅥ姐a
WesternKenya,eSPeCiallytheBaluylaandtheIJuOareaS,haslongbeenknownasoneof the most prosperous places of AfricanIndependent Churches in the continent.Dense
POPulation,earlyWesternmissionaryendeavoursandcertainattitudesofthepeopletowards modernizationingeneralmightbeascribedtocausesofthisChristianindependency.Christian
independency,aSPOliticalindependency,WaSafteral1aslgnOfautonomyanddeparturefrom theWesterninnuence,WhichwereespeCiallyneededinthelatecolonialera・Theindependent Churches,Onthe otherhand,CauSed troubles andpresslngCOmPetitio11for the mainstream
(mission)churches.Astlleindependentchurchesusualiyrepresented(andstillrepresent・)
Certain・graSSrOOtSdiscontentstheywere・atleastimplicitlyagalnStthedominanttheologital PrlnCiplesandwestemizedattitudestowardsmodermizationofthemainstreamchurches.
Or,血ismightbeseenaSamOregeneralprobiemofreiigionandsocietyinruralareas.As IseeitinruralIsukha,the contemporary moraland social▼ideologylS eXPreSSed through Christianity,and different churches or denominations represent the different socialand
ideologicalaspectsamongthevillagerstowardstheconditionscreatedbythecolonialismand themodernity.
In the followlng SeCtioIISIwilltry to explain the presentlocal.situations ofvarious Christian denominationsinIsukha area of Kakamega District,with a few historical
descriptions,andinrelationiothelargeframeworkoftheKenyanstateandsociety・Thereisno good statistics but people agree thatinIsukha thelargest membershipis that ofCatholic
Church,aIlditincludes morethan halfofthepopulation.Then comes thatofthe Friends Church(Quakers).andbothchurchescomprisenineolltOftenmembersofthewholeIsukha
Christians.Thesetwoch11rChesarewhatIcallthemainstreamchurches.Themissionsofthese
twochurchesstartedtoChristianizetheIsukhapeoplefromthebeginnlngOf20thcentury,and
theyhavecompletedthisprocessbynow・
The rest of Christians belong to some twenty denominations whichIlike to call
non−mainstreamchurches・Theyareoldornewindepende王1tChurchesseparatedfrommission Clmrches,relativelynewPentecostalmissionchlユrChesfromtheWest,OrVeryneWCharismatic Churches which has come to evangelize here from somewhere else.The non−mainstream
ChllrChes as a whole have some similarities despite their different orlglnS・Their way of
WOrShipismuchAfricanizedcomparedwithWestemizedworshipinthemainstreamchurches.
TheyuseA鮎candrumswhentheyslng,andtheytendtoattachimportancetotheHolySpirit,
forinstance・Anothersimi1arityisthat,thoughtheyaresmallinnumber,theirvisualpresence
is veryhighinthe eyesofoutside observers・Thisisbecausetheirreligiousactivitiesare VlgOrOuSandtheirworshipisverylongandevenboisterous・Mostimportantthingatpresentis
that they are as a whole a growing religious power eroding strength of the mainstream
C血urches.
hshort,FriendsandCatholicsrepresentnotonlyanestablishedreligiousorderblltaisoa
SOCialestablishmentinIsukha,Whilethemembersofthenon−mainlinechurchesaremoreor lessoutsidethatestablishment.
ⅠⅠ。C臨ur曲es孟唱a量ms宜蝕e$色a琶e
1.Din孟yaMⅦSambⅥra
AlthoughthischurehormOVementdidnotcorrectlybelongtothearea・OfIsukha,itisan Obviousexampleoftheuphe?ValwhichledtotheintefVentionofthecolonialgovernmentin
themid−1940sofBuknsu,nOrthernLuyiaarea・TheDiniyaMusambwa(theReligionof
AneestofS,Shor加edasDYM)・WaSakindofrevivaiismoftraditionaireligiouspractices,butitwasheavilyinfluencedbythechurchorganizationandtheideasofChristiamity・TheDYM
OnCeCauSedaserioussocialconfusionwhichhadnotonlyreligiousbutalsopoliticalnature.
Therewererealcrushesbetweenthechurch(theDYM)andthestate(thecolonialgovernment).
ThemovementoftheDYMhasbeenwidelystudiedanddiscussedbyhistoriansfromthis perspective・(2)
TheDYM smainleaderwasEl勾aMasinde,WhowasexpelledfromtheFriendschurchin
1935becauseofhispolygamy・TheDYMusedtheBibleandthecross,Whilepracticinganimal SaCri五cetotheGodreferredasWere,thenameofthetraditionaldeity.Asamovementitwas
harmiessatfirst,butfrom1944itbecameopenlyanti−Europeanandanti−gOVernment・Many
Violentincidentstookplace・Thelocalagriculturaldepartmentwasatargetofitsattackand Masindeopposedtheveterinaryirtiectionofcattle・Heinsistedal1EuropeansaswellasIndian tradersmustreturnhome・ARomanCatholicmissionwasinvadedbyalargenumberofpeople
ClaimlngthatthemissionariesshouldleavethecountrytTheysacriBeedanimalsforancestors
atthemissioncompound・In1948Masindewasarrested,andtheDYMwassuppressedand COnSequentlybanned・Theleadertogetherwithsomechieffollowersbeinglnjai1,theDYM
lostitsvlgOurSOOn.TheDiniyaMusambwaasaclmrchceasedtoexist.
2・A鉦ieamprophe如Cbureh
AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya
However,itsin皿uenceremainedamongthenorthernandcentralLuyiafairlylong,eVen afterKenya sindependence・InIsukhaitsenduringinfLuencecanbeseeninthepresenceofan independent church ca11ed African Prophetic Church.Though this churchis smallin
membershipevenamongnon−mainstreamchurches,itisactiveanditsinfluenceseemstobe growlngamOngCOmmOnvi11agers・Itisalsopectzliarinthatitsreligiousideasandpractices ShowstrongrelianceontheOldTestament.
ThelPreSentleadefOfthisChurchisPaulMuhati,Whoclaimsthedirectleadershipfrom
Masindeasthethirdleader・InfacthehasseparatedhisownChurchherefromiheoriginal
ClmrchinKabras.ThefollowlngeXPlanationiswhatIheardfromitsrprleStSandthechurch
membersabouttheirchurch・Theyhavethreeprophetsinsuccession,namely,Moses,Jegus,
andEliiaMasinde(theleaderoftheDYM).MosesislikeFather,andJesusislikeSon,andso isElijaliketheHolySpirit・FromthisaccountIunderstandthattheyregardmosthigh1yof
Moses,aIld仙attheycleaflyacknowledgeadirectreligiouspedigreefrofrltheDYM,While theydon tacknowledgetheorthodoxtrinitystatusofJesus・Theseareveryexceptionalfeatures
evenamongthenon−mainstreamclmrches.Ontheotherhand,theAfricanPropheticChurch doesnotfb1lowtheroadoftheanti−Europeanoranti−gOVernmentPOliticalmovementwhich
WaSaSalienttrait ofltile DYMrs actualpractice.Instead,PeOPleofthe・AfricanProphetic
Churchseemtobereal1y−interestedinmakingtheirreligion▲nearertOtheirancestorfsway・Theycal1theirancestorsl−Valmka=(alsomeansgrandparents)andtheirGod,一Nyasayewa
Vakuka門(AncestorsFGod).TheirGodiookslikeMoses−Godsincetheirmostimporian‡rite
called一▼Sayoni‖(actual1ythisisasacredplacesupposedtobeontheMt.Elgon)isasacrifice
ofanimals,tOit.
3。A鉦圭eamC払u陀払0『Ⅲ0旦ySp呈雨竜
As anindependent churchin Luyialand the DYM was rather exceptlOnalinits
anti−Europeanandanti−gOVernmentCharacteranditsdependenceonthetraditionalreligious ideas.AdifferenttypeofChristianindependencystartedtospreadwidelyin Centraland
SouthernLuyialandfrom1927,WhentheHolySpiritrevivaltookplaceintheFriendsChurch
a!1d地isrest!1ted呈nereatingseveralnewch11rChes・Thesechurchesarecommonlvdesi卯ated
‖RohoCh∬d−eS■−orSpidtC加血es・
Themostsuccessfu1church amongthemis calledtheAfrican ChurchofHolySpirit
(shortenedastheHolySpiritChurchinthefollowingpages),WhoseHeadquareterisin Isukha・(3)ItisinfactaPentecostaltypeofchurch,butinterestingly,theHolySpiritrevival in1927itselfwassparkedandguidedbyaparticularwhitemissionary(A.Chilson)ofthe FriendsChurch.UnliketheDYM,thereligiousviewsoftheHolySpiritChurch(orfollムwers oftheRevival)hadnoanti−Whiteelements,thoughtheyindigenizeorAfricanizewaysoftheir
WOrShip・
Sti11therewerevi01enttroublesandseriousdiscordsbetweentheFriendsma]Orltyandthe followers ofthe Revival.Thelatterswerefinal1yexpelledfromthe Churchonchargesof dist11rbingthechurchmeetingsbytheirnoISytOngueS,Violentfaintsanduncontrolledsinglng
andsoon,WhichwereclaimedforthemtobeadirectionoftheHolySpirit・Onoccasionsof theactualevictiontheadministrativechiefsandpolicemenwerecalledinandsomemembers
Werereallyarrested.TheHolySpiritpeoplebecamechurchlessandnowheretoholdworship
exceptin their prlVate houses for the first years of their group・They tended toisolate themselves放omsocialandpoliticalactivitiesofmaJOrity Christians・Even▼tOdaythey are
knownasthe†separatedpeopleI,Whodonftshakehandswith,anddonrteat・tOgetherwithother PeOPleexcepttheirownchurc王IPeOPle・
4.SocialDil・ision
TheDYMandtheHolySpiritChurcharerareexamplesofgraveconnictsbetweenthe
independentchurchesandthemainstreamchurchesinthepas‡Luyialand・Atpresentgeneral relationshipbetween・themainstreamchurchesandthenon−mainstreamchurchesinIsukhais not especiaIly bad.PtopleOfboth spheresin fact血1ngle each otherin everyday social
discotlrSeS・PeaceamOLgdiffeTentChurchesIisamottoalwayspreachedbyぬegOVemment
OfBcialsfromtheKenyanPresidenttolocalassistantchiefs・TheSPiritofcooperationamong ihealiChristiansbecomesacommonsenseamongtnelSuKElaPeOpieandtherehavebeeIlnO
gravecrushamongthemsincetheindependence・
However,One Can eaSily see acertainsocialgap ortensionbetweenthe mainstfeam
Clmrch members and the non−mainstream churchmembers.Funerals aremostimportant
socialoccasionsinIsukhaanditisheldbythechurchwhichthedeceasedbelongedto・When animportantmandieshisfuneralwouldattractseveralthousandmournerS・Importantguestsof
governmentofBcials,Chief畠,aSSistantchiefs,teaChers,SuCCeSSfulbusinessmenandthelikeare
present,andsometimesawholearmyofchildrenappearsfromanearbyschool・Thiskindof
funeralsisalwaysheldbytheFriendChurchor,inalesserdegree,theCatholicChurch・The funerals ofthenon−mainstreamch11rChesare ratherdifferentinmanyways・Aboveall,the Churehtendstomonopolizetheoperationofthefuneral・Or,1ikeinthecaseoftheHolySprit Church,italmostexcludesothervillagersthantheirownmembers・Relativesandneighbours ofnon−memberscanattendthefuneralbuttheyaresimpleobserverSjustsittingbehindthe
scene(exceptthenearestrelativ?S).Thisispartlybeeausetheirwayofpraying(inspiredbythe HolySpirit)andsinging(withjumping)andsoonarepeculiarandthereforethenon−members
Can tvirtuallyparticipateinit・
ThemoresociologicalreasonforitmaybethattheminorityChurchisatightlyorganized
smallcommunltyWhichismoreorlessseparatedfromthemaJOrityvi11agers・Itsmembers COmelargelyfromrelativelypoorfamiliesofIsukhasociety・Itiscommonlysaidthatthepoor fami1iesarelikelytojoinintheminorltyChurchbecauseitsfuneralislesscostlyforthem
AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya
(indeed,anyOneinIsukhaalwayscomplainsabouttheexpenSeOffuneralsthesedays).The
SCeneOfseparatenessinfuneralsis,Ⅰthink,anindicationofagravesocialdivision.Thisdoes notsimplycomefromthe denominationaldifferences.Itisdeeplyrootedintheinevitable
COurSeOfdifferentiationofmodemizationinIsukha・Somehaveadvancedtheirfamilyluckby riding the current of the times,While the others have failed to do so・This process of
differeIltiationis,lnaCertaindegree,reflectedinthefamily schurchmembership.TheFriends ChurchwasthefarthestinpromotlngltSmembersrabilifytocopewiththecolo∫1ialaswellas modernenvironmentinearlycolonialtimesandthishasresultedintheirrelativelyfavorable
SOCialpositio壬トOf−itspresentgeneration・
ⅠⅠⅠ. MainstreamChurehes
1.VeadyMee血go『厨de瓜ds
AFriendsmissiollCame tO eVangelize the easternpart ofLuyialandfromthe Umited
Statesin▲1902ト,makingits・Headquartersin Kaimosi,Tiriki,and thenbranchmissionsin Maragoli・andin‡sukha・It・WaS at瓜rst called the Friends:Afri・CaIndustriai‥Mission and
missionaries(whowerealso・teaChers,medicaldoctorsandengineers)wereeagertoteach AfricansnotoniyCilristianmessagesbutaisoreadingandwri血g,agrleu加re,hygiejieaiid medicine,houseworks,jobtrainingandthelike・In ordertoguardtheirChristianconverts agalnSttherestofvillagersthemissionariesmadethemlivearoundthechurch・ThisChristian vi11agewas・Cal1ed 1ine andtherewerestrict 一ChristianMruleslikeprohibitionofalcoholin
theline・ApparentlyitwasveryeffectiveforeducatlnganeWgenerationofChristiansbecause theyweretaughtnotonlyintensivelybutwerealsomadeoutoftouchwiththeirownnative
clanswhichweresourcesoftheoldandso−Calledanti−Christiancustoms.
ThefirstgenerationoftheAfricanFriendsrealizedtheimportanceofeducationfortheir Children.AsaconsequencethesecondgeIlerationofFriendsfamilieshadagoodchancefor
gettlng‡1eW jobs,Cultivating cash crops and workingln Cities・Many of them became administrativeo伐cersandchiefs,Prlmaryandsecondaryschoolteachersandemployeesof
hjoL・nlTlnnnje只一TlleVllaVeSllCCeededinorganizin亡themselvesintoaclassofDeODlewhohave 、/−」=〉 ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄r▼ ̄■− ̄ ̄−▼ ̄ ̄一ノ
arelativelywealthyfamilywithanewwayoflifbinthepresentIsukha・Recently,however,theFriendsChurchitselfhasfallenintodisarray.AftertheAmerican mission decided to hand over theleadership of the Church to A玩can ChristiarlS,they
Organizedthemselvesin1958irLtO One united body called EastAfricaYearly Meetingof
Friends.Itsunitydidn,tlastlongwhenthel−ElgonFriends‖(meaningFriendsinBukusuor Northernarea)expressedastrongdesiretomaketheirownYearlyMeetingseparatedfrom
theothersin1960・ThiswasputdownforthemomentbythemanoeuvreofSouthernand
Centralgroups,buttheirhopeneVerdwindledbecausetheyfelttheywereleastservedbythe
Churchfundsandeducationalprograms.Thiswasakindofsub−nationalismbaseduponethnic CultureandreglOnalinterests・TherewasnoreligiousdisagreementamonganyFriendsgroups・
In1973theBukusumembersdeclaredaunilateralindependenceof ElgonReligiousSociety
ofFriendsT▼.
ThisincidencewasaforerunnerOfsubdivisionofthee11tireEastAfricaYearlyMeeting.
Thetwomostinfluentialgroups,theSouth(Maragoli)andtheCentral(Isukha)groups,Were SeParatedeachother,WhiletheTirikigroupwhichdislikedtheleadership・Oftheabovetwo groups▲becamealsoindependent.Thosewhoemigratedtocities(Nairobi,Kitale,_Kapsabet,
Kakamega)sep?ratedtheircityYearlyMeetingsonebyone,fearingthatdifferentethnic groupsintheircommunltymightquarrelintheendunlesstheinfluenceoftheirhomelandwas
Slmtout・EventheBukusugroupandtheMaragoligroupcouldn7tholdtheirowninnerunlty
forlongandwerefurthersubdividedintotwoormoreYeariyMeetings.Therearenow14
YearlyMeetingsinKenyawithnamesoftheirowr11iking.Forinstance,Friendspeoplein IsukhaandIdakhohasnow一一TheEastA触caYearlyMeetingofFriends(Central)T▼.(4)
IsthereanylogicalrelationbetweentlleSOCialadvancementoftheFriendsandtherece11t
uncontrollabledivisionsoftheYearlyMeetings?Sub−nationalismorso−Calledtribalismin independentAfricaingeneralisapparentlyafailureofnationalismandtherehave・beenits grave COnSeqllenCeS:ethniccon且ictsandwars,mi1itarycoupsanddisruptlOnOfgovernments and,abovea町lossofnumeroush11manlivesandtotaliSOCialstagnation..Thesub−nationalism Of▼the Friends Church seemsinsignificant compared with these serious etlmic・COnflicts
eisewhere,butIthinkitisstiilwortileXarmnlng工OrltSPeCuiiarcommonplaCe・
IfahealthynatioIlalismisbasednotonlyontheConstitution,thePresidency,thenational assemblyetc・butalso−OnaCOmmOnlanguage andculturewhichenablesnationalstoshare COmmOn emOtion andperception,thenthe Kenyannationalismwhichislargely acolonial
legacyshouldbeinmuchlessdesirablecondition.Thereisnotvirtual1yaKenyannational
Culturedistinguished鈷om,Say,aUgandannationalculture.Englishor随swahiliisgoodfor exchanglngmeSSageSinaformalmeeting,butisnottherealcommonlanguageforvillagersto
COmm11nicateeachotherintheircommunityandfami1y.OnlytheIsukhalanguagecanbea mediumbywhichthelsukhapeopleexpresstheirfeelinganddiscussproblemsofeveryday life.
ItshouldbenotedthattheFriendspeopleareamongthemosteducatedandthe elitesrlin the ruralarea.When the Friends r)eOT)1e were tau圧ht Western civi1culture along with
Christianitybythemissionariestheymusthavelearnedthenationalismbackedbyacommon
Culture.They grew conscious of the Kenyan nationalism,Or mOre PreCisely,Of the incompletenessofthe Kenyannationalismin thecollrSe Ofthe conflictsintheEastAfrica
Yearly Meeting of Friends,and then they seemed to be gradually awoken by the Sub−nationalismbasedonmorestraightsimilarityofcultureandlanguage.
IftheethnicityinvoIvesnecessarilytherealorimaginedideaofthenearnessofkinship
andrnarrlage,andifthesub−nationalismisbasedmoreonacommonculturalenvironment,
thenit can be said that the subdivision ofthe Frie11dsis a case ofthelatterrather than the
AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya
former.Thisisperhapsthereasonwhytherearemanytownship(city)yearlymeetings,Where peOPleofthedi触rentethnicgroupsaremlngled・Thisisalsothereasonwhythesubdivision OftheFriendsisthatofchurch establishment,Wherethe educatedelites are competingthe
leadershipandtheresourcesoftheFriendsChurch・
Itisironicthatthemostsociallyadvancedchurchhasbeenseeminglyretreatedtothe SO−Called T−tribalism一 ,butthisis whereIsee apeculiar aspect ofthe Friends church−State relation.It seems that the sub−nationalism(1ikeIsukha▲Sub−nationalism)in this case
supplementsthenationalism(likeKenyannationalism),anddoesnotclaimtoreplacethe
latter.
ヱ.RomanCathotieCIlureh、
ThereisasuccinctstatementofthestatusofRomanCatholicin監£nya. Thecolonial timesKerlyaaPPearedasathoroughlyAnglicanandProtestantplacewiththeCatholics−all
theCatholicmissionarieswerenon−British−mOreOrlessreducedtothebackground.Inthe Periodfollowlngindependencethe RomanCatholicChurchwasthemostrapidlygrowlng
CburcbinKenya=・(5)
Thisisactual1ywhathappenedinIsukha・AtfirsttheFrie血ds▼Werein・・theforefront,−but nowthegrowingmembershipof・theCatholicChurchisgradua11ystrengtheninglitsOVerall
influences.TheCatholicIChurchinKakamega(Muknmu)staftedmissionactivityalmostatthe
sametime(i904?)withtheFriendsMission,butitswayofapproachingviiiagerswasdifferent.
Lookupthemapof一.DistributionoftheChurchesinCentralIsukha一一(1998)andwecansee onlytwoCatholicchurches(thethirdoneisstillunderconstruction),WhiletherearelO Friendschurches.ThismeansthateverySundaythefollowersoftheCatholicgotodistant
churchcentres(somethinglike40r5km.away)whicharebigbutfewinnumber.Theirmass islarge andittakes place two orthree times on Sundays・This also means the Catholic OrganizationismoreloosethantheFriends,Whichhasdevelopedtightlocalcongregations
Withtheirownsmallchurchbuildings.
ComparedwiththeFriendsmissionthe CatholicChurchwas compromlSlngWiththe
COmmOnvi1lagers Africanwayoflife・ItdidnltmakeasegregatedChristianvillageandwas toleranttoitsmembersldrinking・Itwasnotstricttoprohibittraditionalritualslikethosefor
de只dfnmilvsni一触Ltfjsawell−knowTlfactinIsukhathattheCatholicChurchwasnotsoeager  ̄■−一一 【 ̄ ̄ ̄【 ̄■−ノー」「 ̄ ̄ノ
tobuildschooIsforchildrentoglVethemeducationastheFriendsmissiondid.
The two mission Churches have recruited their believersin the same place but by
differentprlnCiples・Theresultisafairlydistinctpatternwhichmarkssocialinclinationsand Stratainthepresent−dayIsukha village・The Friends memberslargelybelongtothe upper
Stratum,elite classwith good socialpositions,and educated fami1ies,While the Catholic
membersarecommonlybelongtothevastnumbersoflesseducatedclass・Therearecertainly
manyexceptlOnS,butthisistheimagethatpeopleusuallyentertain・TheFriendspeopletendto
think the Catholics are somehow diluted Christians and to ass11me their own superiority・D盈Striわu也Om¢fChristiam Churc馳esimCemtra且亙Su姐a
(監akamegaDis出Ct,kenya,1998)
● Friends
⑩ Catholic
△ PAG A AD C
¢・釣班Gospd
☆ HolySpidt
ェ PEFA
⑳ A打icanpropbe也C Kakamega
鐙−ミニこ
\ヽ
ゴー
クー≠:
1 DeeperChristianLiftMinistry 2 MiracleRevivalandFellowship
3 Cross Church
4 Landmarkl∋aptistChur血(3)
5 (IslamicMosque)
6 NewApostricChurch 7 KenyaAssemblyofGod
静縛e酔
AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya
However,they say that the Friends Church hasbeenlooslngmembership tothe Catholic Clmrchbecauseoftheirreligiousngour,eSPeCiallyofprohibitionofdrinkingalcohol.
3.Christianiza暮ioniltldSeeularization
IftheChristianltyinIsukhaasawholeisseenasacultureofpresent−dayAfricanrural areasitisinterestingtocompareitwiththeChristianltyintheoldSpanishcolonieslikethe
PhilipplneS,Whichhadbeencolonizedsince15thcentury.Inthecaseofthelattertheso−Called folkCatholicisacommoncultureamongtheruralpeasants・Itisnotonlyintheworshipinthe
Churchbutalsoinmanysocialoccasionssuchasfiestas,baptismceremonieslandfuneralsthat
Villagersgathertogetherwiththesameritualbonds.InIsukha,Ontheotherhand,thereisno COmmOnfestivalfor allvillagers to celebrate・The nearestthingis Christmas,but people celebrateitaccordingtotheirownchurches(denominations).Thememorialceremoniesfor thedeadcalled 一Maknmbusho−1arealsodifEerentintheirproceduresandtheritualmeanlngS amongthe two churches,eSPeCiallybecausethe CatholicChurchtendstoallowan animal
SaCr摘ceforthedeadspiritifitisnotdoneopenly・UnliketheCatholicisminthePhilipplneS,
theChristianityinIsukhaisnotrepresentingtheunltyOftheruralcommunltywitha folk Culturel butratherworkingasanagentofdifferentiationincustomsandvaluesaswe11asin socialstrata.
Itiscommoniyheidthatmodemizationisaccompaniedwithsecuiarization,butinisukha
the modernization process has also been the process ofChristinization.Is this a kind of COntradiction,OrhasthistobeunderstoodthattheChristianizationandthesdcularizationhave
beensomehowtwosidesofthesameprocess?IthinktheChristianizationinIsukhahasalso
beenthesecularizationintwosenses・Firstly,theearlyworkofChristianmissionariesclearly ShowstheysuppressedAfricanreligioustraditionsandritualslikefuneralsandcircumcision
CeremOnies・Inotherwordsthey fde−SaCralized thesocie年.However,theChristianityasa Wholedidn7trestorethereligiousordersufficiently,mOStlybecauseitfailedtoglVePeOPlea
harmoniousworldviewwhichwouldhaveuni丘edpeopleasareligiouscommunity・Instead themissionariesgavetwocompetingreligiousviewsandtwosetsofritualpracticesofthe
CatholicandtheProtestant・Thereisnol folkreligionl atpresent,Whichwouldgivethepeople commonreli巨iousvaluesinevervdavlife. し′ノノ
Secondly,aSIhavejustpoiIltedoutabove,theChristianityinIsukhaisworkingasan agentofsocialdifftrentiation・TheFriends,rePreSentlngtheuppersocialcrust,holdanattitude Ofprogressivenessandenterpnse,WhiletheCatholicshaveacertainregressiveattitudewhich hasresultedinageneralretardineducation andprofessionalcareer.The Catholicsandthe
Friends,therefore,havepromotedasocialaswe11asideologicaldivisionpeculiartomodernity
andsecularization.
耳Ⅴ。厨恨鴎血e『C払a皿geS
l.PAGandADCandOtherPentecostaJs
There are stillmany other churchesinIsukha which are not yet discussed.They are
nolトmainstreamchurchesofdifferentorlglnS・Someofthemareproperlycalled independent Chu▼rChr WhichhashistoricallynoconnectionwithWesternmissionchurchesorseparatedfrom
themtohavetheirownchurch.IhavealreadymerltionedtheAfricanPropheticChurch(the Brsttype)andtheA玩canChurchofHolySpirit(thesecondtype)asthis・CategOry.Other churchesofthisLCategOryaretheAfricanDivineClmrch(ADC)and.thePentecostalAssemblies ofGod(PAG),bothofwhichhavenumerousbranchchurchesinIsukha(incentralIsukhaonly,
ADChas9,PAGhas60fthem.Seethemap).Theyaremoreactiveinrecruitingtheir believersfromotherchurchesthanthenowstabilizingIiolySpiritChurchis.
The PAG and the ADC had a connection of the same mission called the Pentecostal
AssembliesofCanada,WhichcamefromCanadain1919atNyanglorinearKaimosi・(6)still therearecertaininterestingdifEerencesbetweenthem.ThePAGistheAfdcaninheritorofthe
missionandisstillsupportedbyit.TheADCbecameindependentfromthemissionin1949 with・aleaderCa11edSauloChabuga,anditisatypicalindependeiltChurch(7)
Naturally these two c壬1urChes resemble each other as African heirs of the Western
l● Pentecostalism.TheirworsnlPinthechurchisverynoISy,COnfesslng10udiy,POSSeSSlngtne HolySpirit,SinglngandjumplngWhileclappinghandsandbeatingdrumS・Theirchurchmen are not only clergymen administerlng their church management btlt also more orless
Charismaticieadersintheirworship ashealersorprophets.Theybaptize their converts by
reallydippingthemintoneatbyrivers・TheyseriouslyfightagalnStWitches andevilsplrltS becausetheybelieveintheexistenceoftheseevilagents,unliketheCatholicsandtheFriends
Whodon−tadmittheirexistenceatleastofficially.
Thoughthesetwochurchespracticeanalmostidenticalreligion,theirappearances are
SOmeWhatdifferent・ThepastorsofthePAGwearjacketsandtieswhilethoseoftheADCwear
A鮎can white robes・The former use SwahiliandIsukhalanguage and mostly understand English,WhilethelatteruseIsukhalanguageonly.Preachingstyleofpastorsisalsodi鮎rent.
ThePAGpastors DreaChislongandinaprofessionalstvlecomparedwiththeADCDaStOrS morehome−grOWnWay・ThesedifferencesallcomefromthefactthatthePAGpastorsare
educatedinaChristianCollegestlPpOrtedbythePentecostalAssembliesofCanadaandthe ADChasnotsuchforeignaid.
There aremorePentecostalchurchesinIsukhajustlike thePAG,These are Tfthe Full
GospelChurchinKenyafTsupportedbyaFimishPentecostalmission(3branchesinthemap),
and‖thePentecostalEvangelicalFellowshipofAfrica‖(PEFA)whichisamerger(in1962)
oftwoPentecostalmissionchurches(8),WhichhadgainedgroundinKenyabythen(2branches
inthemap).Thesechurchesseemtoattractincreasinglymorepeoplefromothermainstream
AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya
cburches.
ThesePentecostalchurchesandtheindependentchurches(ADC,theHolySpiritChurch,
AfricanPropheticChurch),thatis,thenon−mainlinechurchesinIsukhaare,aSIalready POintedout,themostgrowlngtyPeOfchurches・Especiallyforambitiousyoungmenwhowant tohavemorereligiouseducationortohavetheirownbranchchurch,itisfromtheforeign
missionariesofthePentecostalsortheevangelicalsthattheycanexpeCtmaterialaswellas
SPlrltllalsupport・
エNew Chl汀Ches
TheorthodoxPentecostalchurches(plustheHolySpiritChurch)have▲beentheprincipal
forcesofthenon−mainstreamchurchessofar,butrecentlytheotherevangelicalorcharismatic typesofnewch11rCheshavecometostayinIsukha・Achurchcal1ed.†MiracleRevivaland FellowshipPentecostalChurch.一(r.theMiracleChurch一▼forshort)isamongthem.Anewbranch ChurchofitwasbuiltinIsukhaseveralyearsagobySerinaImili,aWOmaninhermid50s・She hadbeenaFriendand herfatherisawealthyFriendsmember・In1993shewas−Veryi11around herthroat▼andears;andWaSnOtCureddespitea11treatmentsinlbigilOSPitalsinNairobiand othertowns.Itwasaroundthosedayswhentwoevangelistsj・paStOrS・OftheMiracleChurch Visitedherinherbedathomeandprayedforher.hthreedaysherpainshadgoneandhasbeen
ingoodheaithsincethen・ShewasconvincedthatthiswasGod亨sworkandaskedtheChurch peoplewhatshecoulddo良)rthem.Theytoldhertobuildachurch(akindofameetinghouse)
atherplaceifpossible・Thisshedid,andthechurchisthefirstbranchoftheMiracleChurchin Isu肋a(mark2in血emap).
TheMiracleChurchwasfoundedbyanIdakhomanca11edElishaChitai・Itsbigreligious
center(Safina)isinMombasaandhasdevelopeditsinfhencefromthecoasttotheupcountry,
especia11yafterstartlngthemassevangelicalismca11ed‖RevivalCmsade−T・Itclaimstohave
120clmrchesinKenya,TanzamiaandUgandawith160pastors・Thesepastorsdonltstaylong
i110neChurchbutgoaroundtheirchurchesonebyoneineverythreeweeks・TheRevival
CrusadesareverybigeventswhichtakeplaceinmaJOrtOWnSinEastAfricaineverytwo
months.A crusade conferencelasts severaldays and attracts alarge number of people,
snmethjnglike40thousaTld_Manv sjckl)erSOllS have beellCured at these occasionsiustlike 一 ̄ ̄}】− 一】▲こ:フ ー】−一 ノ 1 1
Serinahascuredathomebyprayers・
ThistypeofChristianehurchesisverynewinIsukha・Itmaybecharacterizedinthe
followlngtraits:maSSeVangelicalism,Charismaticleaders,highlymobileevangelistsaswellas theirfollowers(whoattendtheCrusadesfarfromtheirhomeplaces),andindividualinterests
inhealingandsuccessinbusinessandthelike・Obviouslythiskindofevangelicalismis influenced by American and European revivalistmissionarylike Reinhard Bonnke who
recently came toAfrica forthe crusadesTItcan alsobe saidthatthis kindofevangelical
Christianityisingeneralneocolonialratherthanpostcolonial・
3。C馳ⅦrChÅ践量ia扇01且amdMode相和
Itis the new church s urban traits that sharply contrast with the ruraltraits of most
ChurchesinIsukha,Which are sedentary with tight communities,COnCernS mOStly fami1Y problems,andareculturallytiedtothelocaltradition(especia11y,1anguage).Theintrusionof theurbantypechurchesintothisruralareaisofnowonderbecausethevillagers,eSPeCially
maleadults,areCOnStantlyoutforjobsorjobseekinginmajOrtOWnSinKenya・Therethey become・aCquaintedwith‖ChristianCrusades‖or‖RevivalMeetings‖whichwereadvancedby
theseurbanchurches.
Moreover,1tSeemSthatthedenselypopulatedruralarealikeIsukhaisnowinvolvedina
certainurban situation.The oncetightlyknittedruralcommunity(by ties ofclans and lineages)isgraduallyloosenedastllelandforcultivationandpasturebecomesscarcebecause Ofconstantdivisionforinheritanceamongfami1ymembers.Afami1ycanbarelypersistunless
itsbreadwinnerhasanemploymentorapart−timejobsomewhereelse・Thisisaverydividing SOCialsituation,Wherevillagers concernsaredirectedtosome▼Otherplacesotherthanto・their OWnvi11age,andtheindividualisticmoneyeconomypartlytakesJOVer thecommunaltradition・
Thisfragmentatingprocesshasbeenclosely▼aSSOCiatedwiththediversifyingchurchafEiliation
Ofvillagers・
TheclanafaliationandthechurchafBiiationarethetwomostimportantpersonaitiesof
theIsukhapeople,andthesetwotieshaveverydifEerentsocialmeanlng・Theclanaffiliation representstraditionalmoralitywhichfundamentallyassumeshomogeneityandequalityamong
its members except the differentiation by age and sex, The most striking thing about the
distributionofChristiandenominationsinIs11kha,Ontheotherhand,isthatitrepresentsthe PrOCeSSOfthesocialdifferentiationwhichiscompletelydi鮎rentfrom,andactuallyopposite to,theclanmorality.Thechurcha組1iationcutsaerosstheclana臨1iationfromthetimeofthe
early Friends evangelism,Which forcefu11y brought a tota11y new Christian villageinto existencein the middle of clan villages・This was the丘rst break ofthe traditionalclan
affiliationbythechllrCha臨1iation・
Theconsequentdevelopmentofthepersonala臨1iationtovariouschurchesasagainstthe COmmunalclantiesis.thus,CloselvrelatedtothecomDlexpatternsofnationaleconomyand nationalpoliticsofmodernKenya.
Notes
(1)BishopRafaelNdingi・ChurchandStateinKenya−inKeTyaChurchesHandbook1973:44
(2)G.S.Were,Essayson4斤icanReltgionin散∫ternKeTD,a,1977/A.Wipper,RuralRebeLs,
1977/A.Wipper,1971,一一ElijaMasinde,afolkhero inHadith3=157−91/).B・Shimany111a,
AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya
且埠α肋扇わ(おα乃d娩eかi如γα臓J∫αmムwα,1978・
(3)otherspiritchurcheswhoseorlgln WaSthe1927RevivalareTITheLyahukaChurchof East Africa , The GospelHoly Spirit Church ofEast AfricaTT and t−The Holy Spirit
ChurchofEastAfrica一 ・Theirsplittinghistoryisfu11ydocumented◆inAneMarieBak
Rasmussen s肋der乃ノ炉よcα′7勒〜r血αJ和ご班e力!卸e71血机馳少勒油Cゐ〟′一C′‡甜i乃且α∫g
AJi・icq1902−1976(BritishAcademicPress,1996),eSPeCiallypp・49−63・
(4)ThecourseoffallingapartoftheEastAfdcaYearlyMeetingofFriendsupto1987is thorough1y studied byAne Marie Bak Rasmussenip herA Histo17qfthe Quaker
MoveillentinA#ica(BritishAcademicPress,1995).Atthatmomentsplintergroupswere Onlytwo,thatis, ElgonReligious▲SocietyofFriends andthe NairobiYearlyMeeting■ ・
(苧)B.SundkkretalリA助わ7γげ娩eCゐ〟J・Cゐi乃メ折よcβ,2000,p.1001.
(6)二 F.B.Welbourn,EastAPicanChristian,0Ⅹford,1965,P.147−.
(7)F・B・Welboum,Af)′dCeわダee′α赦)∽e,0Ⅹ払rd,1966,pt80・
(8)ThesetwoPentecostalsarethelnternationalPentecostalAssemblies(since1938),and TheElimMissionaryAssemblies(since1942)cf.Ke7V7aChurch月加dbook,P.248