• 検索結果がありません。

Church and State in Western Kenya : A Local Developmental Pattern of Christian Denominations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Church and State in Western Kenya : A Local Developmental Pattern of Christian Denominations"

Copied!
16
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Developmental Pattern of Christian Denominations

著者 Nakabayashi Nobuhiro journal or

publication title

平成11(1999)年度科学研究費補助金 基盤研究 (A)(2)研究成果報告書

volume 1997‑1999

page range 61‑74

year 2001‑03‑01

URL http://doi.org/10.24517/00034844

(2)

東アフリカにおける国家主導の社会◎文化変化   と地域的適応に関する動態論的研究  

課題番号 0941027  

平成9年度〜11年度 科学研究費補助金[基盤研究(A)(2)]  

研究成果報告書  

平成13年3月  

(2001年)  

研究代表者   桧園万亀雄  

(東京都立大学人文学部教授)   

(3)

No如血豆roNakabayasi   監anazawaUm豆versi鯉  

I. Ineroduction 

1.Cbure払amdStatei皿監emya  

TheproblemofchurchandstatehastodowithinstitutioJ]Sandthespheresofactionthat  

areproperforeach,andthishasbeenapeculiartraditionofthemodernWesternChristianity.  

Here the concept of separationis considered to be mostimportant・The state,Or the   government,doesnotappointbishopsandpastorsforthechllrChes,andthechurchesdonot  

appointpresideiltS,gOVernOfS,andjtidges・Nofeligioiieanbefavoredoverothersorsupported   bytaxes・Thestatehasnoroleorauthorityinde銭ningbeliefsrelatingtoGodandworship・   

ThispracticewasclearlyseenincolonialKenya(andincolonialA餌caatlarge)inthe   late19thcentury andthe early20thcenturyinthefactthatthemissionelmrchescameto  

KenyanotonlyfromBritainwhichruledKenyapolitica11y,butalsofromUnitedStatesor  

France or any other European countries・The Mission churches scrambled Africa agaln   accordingtotheirownloglC,SOtOSPeak,af[ertheEuropeanpowersscrambledit・  

The history ofthe church−State relationsinWestern Europe shows alot ofconfLicts  

betweenthem・Astothe church−StaterelationsinKenyaitissaidthattherehasbeenlittle  

COnaicts,aSOnemainstreamChurchman described・一▼HereinKenyawe standaverygood   positionasfaraschurch−Staterelationshipsandco−OPerationareconcerned・Thisco−OPeration  

isinaccordancewiththeA血icantraditionalmotto,harambee一(Letuspul1together).Itisin   fieldssuchaseducation,medicineandsocialworkinitsvariousformS,andotherrelatedfields,  

thatchurchandstateinKenyaarenoticeablyco−OPerative・Thisworkingtogetherdidnotonly   beganafterKenyagaineditsindependence,butwasalsopresentduringthecolonialerarl・(1)  

UnlikeWestEuropeancountrieswherethechurchandthestatehavedifferentorlglnS,  

thesetwoinstitutionsinKenyaorlginatedfromoneandthesamesource,thatis,thecolonial   SyStem・This perhaps explains the good relationships between themin Kenya.Moreover,  

unlike someoftheAfricancountries,therehasbeeIlnOViolent disruptlOnOfgovernment  

CauSedbymilitarycoupsorethnicwarsinKenyasofar.Themainstreamchurches,Protestant  

(4)

AnthropologlCalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya  

OrCatholic,havecollectivelycooperatedwiththegovernmentintakingcareofthepeoplein  

general■Theseparationofthechurch−StateinKenyamaynotbesoessentialasitassumes.  

Thereforein Kenya,SeriotlStrOubleswhichinvolvedChristianchurcheswerenotones   betweentheestablishedchurchandthestate,butmostlyonesbetweennewlycreatedchurches   OrindependentchurchesoIltheonehandandmainstreamorestablishedchurchesaidedbythe   governmentOntheother・  

2.Ma塁ns息reamC払ure鮎vs。ImdepemdeI嘘C払ureh−T馳eS鉦Ⅶaせions量m‡sⅥ姐a  

WesternKenya,eSPeCiallytheBaluylaandtheIJuOareaS,haslongbeenknownasoneof   the most prosperous places of AfricanIndependent Churches in the continent.Dense  

POPulation,earlyWesternmissionaryendeavoursandcertainattitudesofthepeopletowards   modernizationingeneralmightbeascribedtocausesofthisChristianindependency.Christian  

independency,aSPOliticalindependency,WaSafteral1aslgnOfautonomyanddeparturefrom   theWesterninnuence,WhichwereespeCiallyneededinthelatecolonialera・Theindependent   Churches,Onthe otherhand,CauSed troubles andpresslngCOmPetitio11for the mainstream  

(mission)churches.Astlleindependentchurchesusualiyrepresented(andstillrepresent・)  

Certain・graSSrOOtSdiscontentstheywere・atleastimplicitlyagalnStthedominanttheologital   PrlnCiplesandwestemizedattitudestowardsmodermizationofthemainstreamchurches.  

Or,血ismightbeseenaSamOregeneralprobiemofreiigionandsocietyinruralareas.As   IseeitinruralIsukha,the contemporary moraland social▼ideologylS eXPreSSed through   Christianity,and different churches or denominations represent the different socialand  

ideologicalaspectsamongthevillagerstowardstheconditionscreatedbythecolonialismand   themodernity.   

In the followlng SeCtioIISIwilltry to explain the presentlocal.situations ofvarious   Christian denominationsinIsukha area of Kakamega District,with a few historical  

descriptions,andinrelationiothelargeframeworkoftheKenyanstateandsociety・Thereisno   good statistics but people agree thatinIsukha thelargest membershipis that ofCatholic  

Church,aIlditincludes morethan halfofthepopulation.Then comes thatofthe Friends   Church(Quakers).andbothchurchescomprisenineolltOftenmembersofthewholeIsukha  

Christians.Thesetwoch11rChesarewhatIcallthemainstreamchurches.Themissionsofthese  

twochurchesstartedtoChristianizetheIsukhapeoplefromthebeginnlngOf20thcentury,and  

theyhavecompletedthisprocessbynow・  

The rest of Christians belong to some twenty denominations whichIlike to call  

non−mainstreamchurches・Theyareoldornewindepende王1tChurchesseparatedfrommission   Clmrches,relativelynewPentecostalmissionchlユrChesfromtheWest,OrVeryneWCharismatic   Churches which has come to evangelize here from somewhere else.The non−mainstream  

ChllrChes as a whole have some similarities despite their different orlglnS・Their way of  

(5)

WOrShipismuchAfricanizedcomparedwithWestemizedworshipinthemainstreamchurches.  

TheyuseA鮎candrumswhentheyslng,andtheytendtoattachimportancetotheHolySpirit,  

forinstance・Anothersimi1arityisthat,thoughtheyaresmallinnumber,theirvisualpresence  

is veryhighinthe eyesofoutside observers・Thisisbecausetheirreligiousactivitiesare   VlgOrOuSandtheirworshipisverylongandevenboisterous・Mostimportantthingatpresentis  

that they are as a whole a growing religious power eroding strength of the mainstream 

C血urches.   

hshort,FriendsandCatholicsrepresentnotonlyanestablishedreligiousorderblltaisoa  

SOCialestablishmentinIsukha,Whilethemembersofthenon−mainlinechurchesaremoreor   lessoutsidethatestablishment.  

ⅠⅠ。C臨ur曲es孟唱a量ms宜蝕e$色a琶e  

1.Din孟yaMⅦSambⅥra  

AlthoughthischurehormOVementdidnotcorrectlybelongtothearea・OfIsukha,itisan   Obviousexampleoftheuphe?ValwhichledtotheintefVentionofthecolonialgovernmentin  

themid−1940sofBuknsu,nOrthernLuyiaarea・TheDiniyaMusambwa(theReligionof  

AneestofS,Shor加edasDYM)・WaSakindofrevivaiismoftraditionaireligiouspractices,but  

itwasheavilyinfluencedbythechurchorganizationandtheideasofChristiamity・TheDYM  

OnCeCauSedaserioussocialconfusionwhichhadnotonlyreligiousbutalsopoliticalnature.  

Therewererealcrushesbetweenthechurch(theDYM)andthestate(thecolonialgovernment).  

ThemovementoftheDYMhasbeenwidelystudiedanddiscussedbyhistoriansfromthis   perspective・(2)  

TheDYM smainleaderwasEl勾aMasinde,WhowasexpelledfromtheFriendschurchin  

1935becauseofhispolygamy・TheDYMusedtheBibleandthecross,Whilepracticinganimal   SaCri五cetotheGodreferredasWere,thenameofthetraditionaldeity.Asamovementitwas  

harmiessatfirst,butfrom1944itbecameopenlyanti−Europeanandanti−gOVernment・Many  

Violentincidentstookplace・Thelocalagriculturaldepartmentwasatargetofitsattackand   Masindeopposedtheveterinaryirtiectionofcattle・Heinsistedal1EuropeansaswellasIndian   tradersmustreturnhome・ARomanCatholicmissionwasinvadedbyalargenumberofpeople  

ClaimlngthatthemissionariesshouldleavethecountrytTheysacriBeedanimalsforancestors  

atthemissioncompound・In1948Masindewasarrested,andtheDYMwassuppressedand   COnSequentlybanned・Theleadertogetherwithsomechieffollowersbeinglnjai1,theDYM  

lostitsvlgOurSOOn.TheDiniyaMusambwaasaclmrchceasedtoexist.  

2・A鉦ieamprophe如Cbureh  

(6)

AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya  

However,itsin皿uenceremainedamongthenorthernandcentralLuyiafairlylong,eVen   afterKenya sindependence・InIsukhaitsenduringinfLuencecanbeseeninthepresenceofan   independent church ca11ed African Prophetic Church.Though this churchis smallin  

membershipevenamongnon−mainstreamchurches,itisactiveanditsinfluenceseemstobe   growlngamOngCOmmOnvi11agers・Itisalsopectzliarinthatitsreligiousideasandpractices   ShowstrongrelianceontheOldTestament.  

ThelPreSentleadefOfthisChurchisPaulMuhati,Whoclaimsthedirectleadershipfrom  

Masindeasthethirdleader・InfacthehasseparatedhisownChurchherefromiheoriginal  

ClmrchinKabras.ThefollowlngeXPlanationiswhatIheardfromitsrprleStSandthechurch  

membersabouttheirchurch・Theyhavethreeprophetsinsuccession,namely,Moses,Jegus,  

andEliiaMasinde(theleaderoftheDYM).MosesislikeFather,andJesusislikeSon,andso   isElijaliketheHolySpirit・FromthisaccountIunderstandthattheyregardmosthigh1yof  

Moses,aIld仙attheycleaflyacknowledgeadirectreligiouspedigreefrofrltheDYM,While   theydon tacknowledgetheorthodoxtrinitystatusofJesus・Theseareveryexceptionalfeatures  

evenamongthenon−mainstreamclmrches.Ontheotherhand,theAfricanPropheticChurch   doesnotfb1lowtheroadoftheanti−Europeanoranti−gOVernmentPOliticalmovementwhich  

WaSaSalienttrait ofltile DYMrs actualpractice.Instead,PeOPleofthe・AfricanProphetic  

Churchseemtobereal1y−interestedinmakingtheirreligion▲nearertOtheirancestorfsway・  

Theycal1theirancestorsl−Valmka=(alsomeansgrandparents)andtheirGod,一Nyasayewa  

Vakuka門(AncestorsFGod).TheirGodiookslikeMoses−Godsincetheirmostimporian‡rite  

called一▼Sayoni‖(actual1ythisisasacredplacesupposedtobeontheMt.Elgon)isasacrifice  

ofanimals,tOit.  

3。A鉦圭eamC払u陀払0『Ⅲ0旦ySp呈雨竜  

As anindependent churchin Luyialand the DYM was rather exceptlOnalinits  

anti−Europeanandanti−gOVernmentCharacteranditsdependenceonthetraditionalreligious   ideas.AdifferenttypeofChristianindependencystartedtospreadwidelyin Centraland  

SouthernLuyialandfrom1927,WhentheHolySpiritrevivaltookplaceintheFriendsChurch  

a!1d地isrest!1ted呈nereatingseveralnewch11rChes・Thesechurchesarecommonlvdesi卯ated  

‖RohoCh∬d−eS■−orSpidtC加血es・  

Themostsuccessfu1church amongthemis calledtheAfrican ChurchofHolySpirit  

(shortenedastheHolySpiritChurchinthefollowingpages),WhoseHeadquareterisin   Isukha・(3)ItisinfactaPentecostaltypeofchurch,butinterestingly,theHolySpiritrevival   in1927itselfwassparkedandguidedbyaparticularwhitemissionary(A.Chilson)ofthe   FriendsChurch.UnliketheDYM,thereligiousviewsoftheHolySpiritChurch(orfollムwers   oftheRevival)hadnoanti−Whiteelements,thoughtheyindigenizeorAfricanizewaysoftheir  

WOrShip・  

(7)

Sti11therewerevi01enttroublesandseriousdiscordsbetweentheFriendsma]Orltyandthe   followers ofthe Revival.Thelatterswerefinal1yexpelledfromthe Churchonchargesof   dist11rbingthechurchmeetingsbytheirnoISytOngueS,Violentfaintsanduncontrolledsinglng  

andsoon,WhichwereclaimedforthemtobeadirectionoftheHolySpirit・Onoccasionsof   theactualevictiontheadministrativechiefsandpolicemenwerecalledinandsomemembers  

Werereallyarrested.TheHolySpiritpeoplebecamechurchlessandnowheretoholdworship  

exceptin their prlVate houses for the first years of their group・They tended toisolate   themselves放omsocialandpoliticalactivitiesofmaJOrity Christians・Even▼tOdaythey are  

knownasthe†separatedpeopleI,Whodonftshakehandswith,anddonrteat・tOgetherwithother   PeOPleexcepttheirownchurc王IPeOPle・  

4.SocialDil・ision  

TheDYMandtheHolySpiritChurcharerareexamplesofgraveconnictsbetweenthe  

independentchurchesandthemainstreamchurchesinthepas‡Luyialand・Atpresentgeneral   relationshipbetween・themainstreamchurchesandthenon−mainstreamchurchesinIsukhais   not especiaIly bad.PtopleOfboth spheresin fact血1ngle each otherin everyday social  

discotlrSeS・PeaceamOLgdiffeTentChurchesIisamottoalwayspreachedbyぬegOVemment  

OfBcialsfromtheKenyanPresidenttolocalassistantchiefs・TheSPiritofcooperationamong   ihealiChristiansbecomesacommonsenseamongtnelSuKElaPeOpieandtherehavebeeIlnO  

gravecrushamongthemsincetheindependence・  

However,One Can eaSily see acertainsocialgap ortensionbetweenthe mainstfeam  

Clmrch members and the non−mainstream churchmembers.Funerals aremostimportant  

socialoccasionsinIsukhaanditisheldbythechurchwhichthedeceasedbelongedto・When   animportantmandieshisfuneralwouldattractseveralthousandmournerS・Importantguestsof  

governmentofBcials,Chief畠,aSSistantchiefs,teaChers,SuCCeSSfulbusinessmenandthelikeare  

present,andsometimesawholearmyofchildrenappearsfromanearbyschool・Thiskindof  

funeralsisalwaysheldbytheFriendChurchor,inalesserdegree,theCatholicChurch・The   funerals ofthenon−mainstreamch11rChesare ratherdifferentinmanyways・Aboveall,the   Churehtendstomonopolizetheoperationofthefuneral・Or,1ikeinthecaseoftheHolySprit   Church,italmostexcludesothervillagersthantheirownmembers・Relativesandneighbours   ofnon−memberscanattendthefuneralbuttheyaresimpleobserverSjustsittingbehindthe  

scene(exceptthenearestrelativ?S).Thisispartlybeeausetheirwayofpraying(inspiredbythe   HolySpirit)andsinging(withjumping)andsoonarepeculiarandthereforethenon−members  

Can tvirtuallyparticipateinit・  

ThemoresociologicalreasonforitmaybethattheminorityChurchisatightlyorganized  

smallcommunltyWhichismoreorlessseparatedfromthemaJOrityvi11agers・Itsmembers   COmelargelyfromrelativelypoorfamiliesofIsukhasociety・Itiscommonlysaidthatthepoor   fami1iesarelikelytojoinintheminorltyChurchbecauseitsfuneralislesscostlyforthem  

(8)

AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya  

(indeed,anyOneinIsukhaalwayscomplainsabouttheexpenSeOffuneralsthesedays).The  

SCeneOfseparatenessinfuneralsis,Ⅰthink,anindicationofagravesocialdivision.Thisdoes   notsimplycomefromthe denominationaldifferences.Itisdeeplyrootedintheinevitable  

COurSeOfdifferentiationofmodemizationinIsukha・Somehaveadvancedtheirfamilyluckby   riding the current of the times,While the others have failed to do so・This process of  

differeIltiationis,lnaCertaindegree,reflectedinthefamily schurchmembership.TheFriends   ChurchwasthefarthestinpromotlngltSmembersrabilifytocopewiththecolo∫1ialaswellas   modernenvironmentinearlycolonialtimesandthishasresultedintheirrelativelyfavorable  

SOCialpositio壬トOf−itspresentgeneration・  

ⅠⅠⅠ. MainstreamChurehes  

1.VeadyMee血go『厨de瓜ds   

AFriendsmissiollCame tO eVangelize the easternpart ofLuyialandfromthe Umited  

Statesin▲1902ト,makingits・Headquartersin Kaimosi,Tiriki,and thenbranchmissionsin   Maragoli・andin‡sukha・It・WaS at瓜rst called the Friends:Afri・CaIndustriai‥Mission and  

missionaries(whowerealso・teaChers,medicaldoctorsandengineers)wereeagertoteach   AfricansnotoniyCilristianmessagesbutaisoreadingandwri血g,agrleu加re,hygiejieaiid   medicine,houseworks,jobtrainingandthelike・In ordertoguardtheirChristianconverts   agalnSttherestofvillagersthemissionariesmadethemlivearoundthechurch・ThisChristian   vi11agewas・Cal1ed 1ine andtherewerestrict 一ChristianMruleslikeprohibitionofalcoholin  

theline・ApparentlyitwasveryeffectiveforeducatlnganeWgenerationofChristiansbecause   theyweretaughtnotonlyintensivelybutwerealsomadeoutoftouchwiththeirownnative  

clanswhichweresourcesoftheoldandso−Calledanti−Christiancustoms.  

ThefirstgenerationoftheAfricanFriendsrealizedtheimportanceofeducationfortheir   Children.AsaconsequencethesecondgeIlerationofFriendsfamilieshadagoodchancefor  

gettlng‡1eW jobs,Cultivating cash crops and workingln Cities・Many of them became   administrativeo伐cersandchiefs,Prlmaryandsecondaryschoolteachersandemployeesof  

hjoL・nlTlnnnje只一TlleVllaVeSllCCeededinorganizin亡themselvesintoaclassofDeODlewhohave 、/−」=〉 ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄r▼ ̄■− ̄ ̄−▼ ̄ ̄一ノ  

arelativelywealthyfamilywithanewwayoflifbinthepresentIsukha・  

Recently,however,theFriendsChurchitselfhasfallenintodisarray.AftertheAmerican   mission decided to hand over theleadership of the Church to A玩can ChristiarlS,they  

Organizedthemselvesin1958irLtO One united body called EastAfricaYearly Meetingof  

Friends.Itsunitydidn,tlastlongwhenthel−ElgonFriends‖(meaningFriendsinBukusuor   Northernarea)expressedastrongdesiretomaketheirownYearlyMeetingseparatedfrom  

theothersin1960・ThiswasputdownforthemomentbythemanoeuvreofSouthernand  

Centralgroups,buttheirhopeneVerdwindledbecausetheyfelttheywereleastservedbythe  

(9)

Churchfundsandeducationalprograms.Thiswasakindofsub−nationalismbaseduponethnic   CultureandreglOnalinterests・TherewasnoreligiousdisagreementamonganyFriendsgroups・  

In1973theBukusumembersdeclaredaunilateralindependenceof ElgonReligiousSociety  

ofFriendsT▼.  

ThisincidencewasaforerunnerOfsubdivisionofthee11tireEastAfricaYearlyMeeting.  

Thetwomostinfluentialgroups,theSouth(Maragoli)andtheCentral(Isukha)groups,Were   SeParatedeachother,WhiletheTirikigroupwhichdislikedtheleadership・Oftheabovetwo   groups▲becamealsoindependent.Thosewhoemigratedtocities(Nairobi,Kitale,_Kapsabet,  

Kakamega)sep?ratedtheircityYearlyMeetingsonebyone,fearingthatdifferentethnic   groupsintheircommunltymightquarrelintheendunlesstheinfluenceoftheirhomelandwas  

Slmtout・EventheBukusugroupandtheMaragoligroupcouldn7tholdtheirowninnerunlty  

forlongandwerefurthersubdividedintotwoormoreYeariyMeetings.Therearenow14  

YearlyMeetingsinKenyawithnamesoftheirowr11iking.Forinstance,Friendspeoplein   IsukhaandIdakhohasnow一一TheEastA触caYearlyMeetingofFriends(Central)T▼.(4)   

IsthereanylogicalrelationbetweentlleSOCialadvancementoftheFriendsandtherece11t  

uncontrollabledivisionsoftheYearlyMeetings?Sub−nationalismorso−Calledtribalismin   independentAfricaingeneralisapparentlyafailureofnationalismandtherehave・beenits   grave COnSeqllenCeS:ethniccon且ictsandwars,mi1itarycoupsanddisruptlOnOfgovernments   and,abovea町lossofnumeroush11manlivesandtotaliSOCialstagnation..Thesub−nationalism   Of▼the Friends Church seemsinsignificant compared with these serious etlmic・COnflicts  

eisewhere,butIthinkitisstiilwortileXarmnlng工OrltSPeCuiiarcommonplaCe・   

IfahealthynatioIlalismisbasednotonlyontheConstitution,thePresidency,thenational   assemblyetc・butalso−OnaCOmmOnlanguage andculturewhichenablesnationalstoshare   COmmOn emOtion andperception,thenthe Kenyannationalismwhichislargely acolonial  

legacyshouldbeinmuchlessdesirablecondition.Thereisnotvirtual1yaKenyannational  

Culturedistinguished鈷om,Say,aUgandannationalculture.Englishor随swahiliisgoodfor   exchanglngmeSSageSinaformalmeeting,butisnottherealcommonlanguageforvillagersto  

COmm11nicateeachotherintheircommunityandfami1y.OnlytheIsukhalanguagecanbea   mediumbywhichthelsukhapeopleexpresstheirfeelinganddiscussproblemsofeveryday   life.   

ItshouldbenotedthattheFriendspeopleareamongthemosteducatedandthe elitesrlin   the ruralarea.When the Friends r)eOT)1e were tau圧ht Western civi1culture along with  

Christianitybythemissionariestheymusthavelearnedthenationalismbackedbyacommon  

Culture.They grew conscious of the Kenyan nationalism,Or mOre PreCisely,Of the   incompletenessofthe Kenyannationalismin thecollrSe Ofthe conflictsintheEastAfrica  

Yearly Meeting of Friends,and then they seemed to be gradually awoken by the   Sub−nationalismbasedonmorestraightsimilarityofcultureandlanguage.   

IftheethnicityinvoIvesnecessarilytherealorimaginedideaofthenearnessofkinship  

andrnarrlage,andifthesub−nationalismisbasedmoreonacommonculturalenvironment,  

thenit can be said that the subdivision ofthe Frie11dsis a case ofthelatterrather than the  

(10)

AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya  

former.Thisisperhapsthereasonwhytherearemanytownship(city)yearlymeetings,Where   peOPleofthedi触rentethnicgroupsaremlngled・Thisisalsothereasonwhythesubdivision   OftheFriendsisthatofchurch establishment,Wherethe educatedelites are competingthe  

leadershipandtheresourcesoftheFriendsChurch・   

Itisironicthatthemostsociallyadvancedchurchhasbeenseeminglyretreatedtothe   SO−Called T−tribalism一 ,butthisis whereIsee apeculiar aspect ofthe Friends church−State   relation.It seems that the sub−nationalism(1ikeIsukha▲Sub−nationalism)in this case  

supplementsthenationalism(likeKenyannationalism),anddoesnotclaimtoreplacethe  

latter.  

ヱ.RomanCathotieCIlureh、  

ThereisasuccinctstatementofthestatusofRomanCatholicin監£nya. Thecolonial   timesKerlyaaPPearedasathoroughlyAnglicanandProtestantplacewiththeCatholics−all  

theCatholicmissionarieswerenon−British−mOreOrlessreducedtothebackground.Inthe   Periodfollowlngindependencethe RomanCatholicChurchwasthemostrapidlygrowlng  

CburcbinKenya=・(5)  

Thisisactual1ywhathappenedinIsukha・AtfirsttheFrie血ds▼Werein・・theforefront,−but   nowthegrowingmembershipof・theCatholicChurchisgradua11ystrengtheninglitsOVerall  

influences.TheCatholicIChurchinKakamega(Muknmu)staftedmissionactivityalmostatthe  

sametime(i904?)withtheFriendsMission,butitswayofapproachingviiiagerswasdifferent.  

Lookupthemapof一.DistributionoftheChurchesinCentralIsukha一一(1998)andwecansee   onlytwoCatholicchurches(thethirdoneisstillunderconstruction),WhiletherearelO   Friendschurches.ThismeansthateverySundaythefollowersoftheCatholicgotodistant  

churchcentres(somethinglike40r5km.away)whicharebigbutfewinnumber.Theirmass   islarge andittakes place two orthree times on Sundays・This also means the Catholic   OrganizationismoreloosethantheFriends,Whichhasdevelopedtightlocalcongregations  

Withtheirownsmallchurchbuildings.  

ComparedwiththeFriendsmissionthe CatholicChurchwas compromlSlngWiththe  

COmmOnvi1lagers Africanwayoflife・ItdidnltmakeasegregatedChristianvillageandwas   toleranttoitsmembersldrinking・Itwasnotstricttoprohibittraditionalritualslikethosefor  

de只dfnmilvsni一触Ltfjsawell−knowTlfactinIsukhathattheCatholicChurchwasnotsoeager  ̄■−一一 【 ̄ ̄ ̄【 ̄■−ノー」「 ̄ ̄ノ  

tobuildschooIsforchildrentoglVethemeducationastheFriendsmissiondid.  

The two mission Churches have recruited their believersin the same place but by  

differentprlnCiples・Theresultisafairlydistinctpatternwhichmarkssocialinclinationsand   Stratainthepresent−dayIsukha village・The Friends memberslargelybelongtothe upper  

Stratum,elite classwith good socialpositions,and educated fami1ies,While the Catholic  

membersarecommonlybelongtothevastnumbersoflesseducatedclass・Therearecertainly  

manyexceptlOnS,butthisistheimagethatpeopleusuallyentertain・TheFriendspeopletendto  

think the Catholics are somehow diluted Christians and to ass11me their own superiority・  

(11)

D盈Striわu也Om¢fChristiam Churc馳esimCemtra且亙Su姐a  

(監akamegaDis出Ct,kenya,1998)  

● Friends  

⑩ Catholic  

△ PAG   A AD C  

¢・釣班Gospd  

☆ HolySpidt  

ェ PEFA  

⑳ A打icanpropbe也C   Kakamega   

鐙−ミニこ  

\ヽ  

ゴー 

クー≠:  

1 DeeperChristianLiftMinistry   2 MiracleRevivalandFellowship  

3 Cross Church  

4 Landmarkl∋aptistChur血(3)  

5 (IslamicMosque)  

6 NewApostricChurch   7 KenyaAssemblyofGod  

静縛e酔  

(12)

AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya  

However,they say that the Friends Church hasbeenlooslngmembership tothe Catholic   Clmrchbecauseoftheirreligiousngour,eSPeCiallyofprohibitionofdrinkingalcohol.  

3.Christianiza暮ioniltldSeeularization   

IftheChristianltyinIsukhaasawholeisseenasacultureofpresent−dayAfricanrural   areasitisinterestingtocompareitwiththeChristianltyintheoldSpanishcolonieslikethe  

PhilipplneS,Whichhadbeencolonizedsince15thcentury.Inthecaseofthelattertheso−Called   folkCatholicisacommoncultureamongtheruralpeasants・Itisnotonlyintheworshipinthe  

Churchbutalsoinmanysocialoccasionssuchasfiestas,baptismceremonieslandfuneralsthat  

Villagersgathertogetherwiththesameritualbonds.InIsukha,Ontheotherhand,thereisno   COmmOnfestivalfor allvillagers to celebrate・The nearestthingis Christmas,but people   celebrateitaccordingtotheirownchurches(denominations).Thememorialceremoniesfor   thedeadcalled 一Maknmbusho−1arealsodifEerentintheirproceduresandtheritualmeanlngS   amongthe two churches,eSPeCiallybecausethe CatholicChurchtendstoallowan animal  

SaCr摘ceforthedeadspiritifitisnotdoneopenly・UnliketheCatholicisminthePhilipplneS,  

theChristianityinIsukhaisnotrepresentingtheunltyOftheruralcommunltywitha folk   Culturel butratherworkingasanagentofdifferentiationincustomsandvaluesaswe11asin   socialstrata.   

Itiscommoniyheidthatmodemizationisaccompaniedwithsecuiarization,butinisukha  

the modernization process has also been the process ofChristinization.Is this a kind of   COntradiction,OrhasthistobeunderstoodthattheChristianizationandthesdcularizationhave  

beensomehowtwosidesofthesameprocess?IthinktheChristianizationinIsukhahasalso  

beenthesecularizationintwosenses・Firstly,theearlyworkofChristianmissionariesclearly   ShowstheysuppressedAfricanreligioustraditionsandritualslikefuneralsandcircumcision  

CeremOnies・Inotherwordsthey fde−SaCralized thesocie年.However,theChristianityasa   Wholedidn7trestorethereligiousordersufficiently,mOStlybecauseitfailedtoglVePeOPlea  

harmoniousworldviewwhichwouldhaveuni丘edpeopleasareligiouscommunity・Instead   themissionariesgavetwocompetingreligiousviewsandtwosetsofritualpracticesofthe  

CatholicandtheProtestant・Thereisnol folkreligionl atpresent,Whichwouldgivethepeople   commonreli巨iousvaluesinevervdavlife. し′ノノ  

Secondly,aSIhavejustpoiIltedoutabove,theChristianityinIsukhaisworkingasan   agentofsocialdifftrentiation・TheFriends,rePreSentlngtheuppersocialcrust,holdanattitude   Ofprogressivenessandenterpnse,WhiletheCatholicshaveacertainregressiveattitudewhich   hasresultedinageneralretardineducation andprofessionalcareer.The Catholicsandthe  

Friends,therefore,havepromotedasocialaswe11asideologicaldivisionpeculiartomodernity  

andsecularization.  

(13)

耳Ⅴ。厨恨鴎血e『C払a皿geS  

l.PAGandADCandOtherPentecostaJs  

There are stillmany other churchesinIsukha which are not yet discussed.They are  

nolトmainstreamchurchesofdifferentorlglnS・Someofthemareproperlycalled independent   Chu▼rChr WhichhashistoricallynoconnectionwithWesternmissionchurchesorseparatedfrom  

themtohavetheirownchurch.IhavealreadymerltionedtheAfricanPropheticChurch(the   Brsttype)andtheA玩canChurchofHolySpirit(thesecondtype)asthis・CategOry.Other   churchesofthisLCategOryaretheAfricanDivineClmrch(ADC)and.thePentecostalAssemblies   ofGod(PAG),bothofwhichhavenumerousbranchchurchesinIsukha(incentralIsukhaonly,  

ADChas9,PAGhas60fthem.Seethemap).Theyaremoreactiveinrecruitingtheir   believersfromotherchurchesthanthenowstabilizingIiolySpiritChurchis.  

The PAG and the ADC had a connection of the same mission called the Pentecostal  

AssembliesofCanada,WhichcamefromCanadain1919atNyanglorinearKaimosi・(6)still   therearecertaininterestingdifEerencesbetweenthem.ThePAGistheAfdcaninheritorofthe  

missionandisstillsupportedbyit.TheADCbecameindependentfromthemissionin1949   with・aleaderCa11edSauloChabuga,anditisatypicalindependeiltChurch(7)  

Naturally these two c壬1urChes resemble each other as African heirs of the Western  

l● Pentecostalism.TheirworsnlPinthechurchisverynoISy,COnfesslng10udiy,POSSeSSlngtne   HolySpirit,SinglngandjumplngWhileclappinghandsandbeatingdrumS・Theirchurchmen   are not only clergymen administerlng their church management btlt also more orless  

Charismaticieadersintheirworship ashealersorprophets.Theybaptize their converts by  

reallydippingthemintoneatbyrivers・TheyseriouslyfightagalnStWitches andevilsplrltS   becausetheybelieveintheexistenceoftheseevilagents,unliketheCatholicsandtheFriends  

Whodon−tadmittheirexistenceatleastofficially.  

Thoughthesetwochurchespracticeanalmostidenticalreligion,theirappearances are  

SOmeWhatdifferent・ThepastorsofthePAGwearjacketsandtieswhilethoseoftheADCwear  

A鮎can white robes・The former use SwahiliandIsukhalanguage and mostly understand   English,WhilethelatteruseIsukhalanguageonly.Preachingstyleofpastorsisalsodi鮎rent.  

ThePAGpastors DreaChislongandinaprofessionalstvlecomparedwiththeADCDaStOrS    morehome−grOWnWay・ThesedifferencesallcomefromthefactthatthePAGpastorsare  

educatedinaChristianCollegestlPpOrtedbythePentecostalAssembliesofCanadaandthe   ADChasnotsuchforeignaid.  

There aremorePentecostalchurchesinIsukhajustlike thePAG,These are Tfthe Full  

GospelChurchinKenyafTsupportedbyaFimishPentecostalmission(3branchesinthemap),  

and‖thePentecostalEvangelicalFellowshipofAfrica‖(PEFA)whichisamerger(in1962)  

oftwoPentecostalmissionchurches(8),WhichhadgainedgroundinKenyabythen(2branches  

inthemap).Thesechurchesseemtoattractincreasinglymorepeoplefromothermainstream  

(14)

AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya  

cburches.   

ThesePentecostalchurchesandtheindependentchurches(ADC,theHolySpiritChurch,  

AfricanPropheticChurch),thatis,thenon−mainlinechurchesinIsukhaare,aSIalready   POintedout,themostgrowlngtyPeOfchurches・Especiallyforambitiousyoungmenwhowant   tohavemorereligiouseducationortohavetheirownbranchchurch,itisfromtheforeign  

missionariesofthePentecostalsortheevangelicalsthattheycanexpeCtmaterialaswellas  

SPlrltllalsupport・ 

エNew Chl汀Ches  

TheorthodoxPentecostalchurches(plustheHolySpiritChurch)have▲beentheprincipal  

forcesofthenon−mainstreamchurchessofar,butrecentlytheotherevangelicalorcharismatic   typesofnewch11rCheshavecometostayinIsukha・Achurchcal1ed.†MiracleRevivaland   FellowshipPentecostalChurch.一(r.theMiracleChurch一▼forshort)isamongthem.Anewbranch   ChurchofitwasbuiltinIsukhaseveralyearsagobySerinaImili,aWOmaninhermid50s・She   hadbeenaFriendand herfatherisawealthyFriendsmember・In1993shewas−Veryi11around   herthroat▼andears;andWaSnOtCureddespitea11treatmentsinlbigilOSPitalsinNairobiand   othertowns.Itwasaroundthosedayswhentwoevangelistsj・paStOrS・OftheMiracleChurch   Visitedherinherbedathomeandprayedforher.hthreedaysherpainshadgoneandhasbeen  

ingoodheaithsincethen・ShewasconvincedthatthiswasGod亨sworkandaskedtheChurch   peoplewhatshecoulddo良)rthem.Theytoldhertobuildachurch(akindofameetinghouse)  

atherplaceifpossible・Thisshedid,andthechurchisthefirstbranchoftheMiracleChurchin   Isu肋a(mark2in血emap).  

TheMiracleChurchwasfoundedbyanIdakhomanca11edElishaChitai・Itsbigreligious  

center(Safina)isinMombasaandhasdevelopeditsinfhencefromthecoasttotheupcountry,  

especia11yafterstartlngthemassevangelicalismca11ed‖RevivalCmsade−T・Itclaimstohave  

120clmrchesinKenya,TanzamiaandUgandawith160pastors・Thesepastorsdonltstaylong  

i110neChurchbutgoaroundtheirchurchesonebyoneineverythreeweeks・TheRevival  

CrusadesareverybigeventswhichtakeplaceinmaJOrtOWnSinEastAfricaineverytwo  

months.A crusade conferencelasts severaldays and attracts alarge number of people,  

snmethjnglike40thousaTld_Manv sjckl)erSOllS have beellCured at these occasionsiustlike  一 ̄ ̄}】− 一】▲こ:フ ー】−一      ノ 1     1  

Serinahascuredathomebyprayers・  

ThistypeofChristianehurchesisverynewinIsukha・Itmaybecharacterizedinthe  

followlngtraits:maSSeVangelicalism,Charismaticleaders,highlymobileevangelistsaswellas   theirfollowers(whoattendtheCrusadesfarfromtheirhomeplaces),andindividualinterests  

inhealingandsuccessinbusinessandthelike・Obviouslythiskindofevangelicalismis   influenced by American and European revivalistmissionarylike Reinhard Bonnke who  

recently came toAfrica forthe crusadesTItcan alsobe saidthatthis kindofevangelical  

Christianityisingeneralneocolonialratherthanpostcolonial・  

(15)

3。C馳ⅦrChÅ践量ia扇01且amdMode相和   

Itis the new church s urban traits that sharply contrast with the ruraltraits of most  

ChurchesinIsukha,Which are sedentary with tight communities,COnCernS mOStly fami1Y   problems,andareculturallytiedtothelocaltradition(especia11y,1anguage).Theintrusionof   theurbantypechurchesintothisruralareaisofnowonderbecausethevillagers,eSPeCially  

maleadults,areCOnStantlyoutforjobsorjobseekinginmajOrtOWnSinKenya・Therethey   become・aCquaintedwith‖ChristianCrusades‖or‖RevivalMeetings‖whichwereadvancedby  

theseurbanchurches.  

Moreover,1tSeemSthatthedenselypopulatedruralarealikeIsukhaisnowinvolvedina  

certainurban situation.The oncetightlyknittedruralcommunity(by ties ofclans and   lineages)isgraduallyloosenedastllelandforcultivationandpasturebecomesscarcebecause   Ofconstantdivisionforinheritanceamongfami1ymembers.Afami1ycanbarelypersistunless  

itsbreadwinnerhasanemploymentorapart−timejobsomewhereelse・Thisisaverydividing   SOCialsituation,Wherevillagers concernsaredirectedtosome▼Otherplacesotherthanto・their   OWnvi11age,andtheindividualisticmoneyeconomypartlytakesJOVer thecommunaltradition・  

Thisfragmentatingprocesshasbeenclosely▼aSSOCiatedwiththediversifyingchurchafEiliation 

Ofvillagers・  

TheclanafaliationandthechurchafBiiationarethetwomostimportantpersonaitiesof  

theIsukhapeople,andthesetwotieshaveverydifEerentsocialmeanlng・Theclanaffiliation   representstraditionalmoralitywhichfundamentallyassumeshomogeneityandequalityamong  

its members except the differentiation by age and sex, The most striking thing about the 

distributionofChristiandenominationsinIs11kha,Ontheotherhand,isthatitrepresentsthe   PrOCeSSOfthesocialdifferentiationwhichiscompletelydi鮎rentfrom,andactuallyopposite   to,theclanmorality.Thechurcha組1iationcutsaerosstheclana臨1iationfromthetimeofthe  

early Friends evangelism,Which forcefu11y brought a tota11y new Christian villageinto   existencein the middle of clan villages・This was the丘rst break ofthe traditionalclan  

affiliationbythechllrCha臨1iation・  

Theconsequentdevelopmentofthepersonala臨1iationtovariouschurchesasagainstthe   COmmunalclantiesis.thus,CloselvrelatedtothecomDlexpatternsofnationaleconomyand   nationalpoliticsofmodernKenya.  

Notes   

(1)BishopRafaelNdingi・ChurchandStateinKenya−inKeTyaChurchesHandbook1973:44  

(2)G.S.Were,Essayson4斤icanReltgionin散∫ternKeTD,a,1977/A.Wipper,RuralRebeLs,   

1977/A.Wipper,1971,一一ElijaMasinde,afolkhero inHadith3=157−91/).B・Shimany111a,  

(16)

AnthropologicalStudyonDirectedChangeandRegionalAdaptationsinKenya   

且埠α肋扇わ(おα乃d娩eかi如γα臓J∫αmムwα,1978・  

(3)otherspiritchurcheswhoseorlgln WaSthe1927RevivalareTITheLyahukaChurchof    East Africa , The GospelHoly Spirit Church ofEast AfricaTT and t−The Holy Spirit   

ChurchofEastAfrica一 ・Theirsplittinghistoryisfu11ydocumented◆inAneMarieBak   

Rasmussen s肋der乃ノ炉よcα′7勒〜r血αJ和ご班e力!卸e71血机馳少勒油Cゐ〟′一C′‡甜i乃且α∫g   

AJi・icq1902−1976(BritishAcademicPress,1996),eSPeCiallypp・49−63・  

(4)ThecourseoffallingapartoftheEastAfdcaYearlyMeetingofFriendsupto1987is    thorough1y studied byAne Marie Bak Rasmussenip herA Histo17qfthe Quaker   

MoveillentinA#ica(BritishAcademicPress,1995).Atthatmomentsplintergroupswere    Onlytwo,thatis, ElgonReligious▲SocietyofFriends andthe NairobiYearlyMeeting■ ・  

(苧)B.SundkkretalリA助わ7γげ娩eCゐ〟J・Cゐi乃メ折よcβ,2000,p.1001.  

(6)二 F.B.Welbourn,EastAPicanChristian,0Ⅹford,1965,P.147−.  

(7)F・B・Welboum,Af)′dCeわダee′α赦)∽e,0Ⅹ払rd,1966,pt80・  

(8)ThesetwoPentecostalsarethelnternationalPentecostalAssemblies(since1938),and    TheElimMissionaryAssemblies(since1942)cf.Ke7V7aChurch月加dbook,P.248  

参照

関連したドキュメント

Furthermore, we present novel numerical evidence of time evolution of patterns controlled by self- and cross-diffusion in the model and find that the model dynamics exhibits a cross-di

Theorem 1.1 The principal order ideal generated by an involution w in the Bruhat order on the involutions in a symmetric group is a Boolean lattice if and only if w avoids the

An example of a database state in the lextensive category of finite sets, for the EA sketch of our school data specification is provided by any database which models the

In this, the first ever in-depth study of the econometric practice of nonaca- demic economists, I analyse the way economists in business and government currently approach

Indeed, showing that the perturbations to the effective spacetime structure induced by perturbations of the reference state (e.g., a local re- striction of Minkowski vacuum or

I.7 This polynomial occurs naturally in our previous work, where it is conjec- tured to give a representation theoretical interpretation to the coefficients K ˜ λµ (q, t). I.8

We next define the bounded RSK correspondence, BRSK, a function which maps negative multisets on N 2 to negative semistandard notched bitableaux... Let j be the row number of the

Figure 3: A colored binary tree and its corresponding t 7 2 -avoiding ternary tree Note that any ternary tree that is produced by this algorithm certainly avoids t 7 2 since a