• 検索結果がありません。

HYPERBOLIC PROBLEMS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "HYPERBOLIC PROBLEMS"

Copied!
14
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

HYPERBOLIC PROBLEMS

RODICA LUCA

Received 1 November 2005; Revised 10 March 2006; Accepted 7 April 2006

We investigate the existence and uniqueness of solutions to a class of discrete hyperbolic systems with some nonlinear extreme conditions and initial data, in a real Hilbert space.

Copyright © 2006 Rodica Luca. This is an open access article distributed under the Cre- ative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

LetHbe a real Hilbert space with the scalar product·,·and the associated norm · . In this paper we will investigate the discrete hyperbolic system

duj

dt (t) +vj(t)vj1(t)

hj +Auj(t)fj(t), dvj

dt (t) +uj+1(t)uj(t)

hj +Bvj(t)gj(t),

j=1,N,t[0,T], inH, (S)

with the extreme conditions

v0(t)= −αu1(t), uN+1(t)=βvN(t), t[0,T], (EC) and the initial data

uj(0)=uj0, vj(0)=vj0, j=1,N, (ID) whereNN,hj>0, j=1,N, and α,β,A,B are operators inH, which satisfy some assumptions.

Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Dierence Equations Volume 2006, Article ID 89260, Pages1–14 DOI 10.1155/ADE/2006/89260

(2)

This problem is a discrete version with respect tox(withH=R) of the problem

∂u

∂t(t,x) +∂v

∂x(t,x) +Au(t,x) f(t,x),

∂v

∂t(t,x) +∂u

∂x(t,x) +Bv(t,x)g(t,x),

0< x <1,t >0, inR, (S)

with the boundary conditions

v(t, 0)= −αu(t, 0), u(t, 1)=βv(t, 1), t >0, (BC) and the initial data

u(0,x)=u0(x), v(0,x)=v0(x), 0< x <1. (IC) The above problem has applications in electrotechnics (the propagation phenomena in electrical networks) and mechanics (the variable flow of a fluid)—see [7,8,13]. The system (S) subject to various boundary conditions has been studied by many authors:

Barbu, Iftimie, Moros¸anu, and Luca, in [4,5,9,11,12]. Using an idea from [14] we dis- cretize the problem (S) + (BC) + (IC) in this way: letN be a given integer (N1) and h=1/(N+ 1). In a first stage we approximate the system (S) and the boundary condi- tions (BC) by

∂u

∂t(t,x) +v(t,x)v(t,xh)

h +Au(t,x)f(t,x), x

h, (N+ 1)h,

∂v

∂t(t,x) +u(t,x+h)u(t,x)

h +Bv(t,x)g(t,x), x(0,Nh),t >0, v(t, 0)= −αu(t, 0), u(t,Nh)=βv(t,Nh).

(1.1)

We look foruandvof the formu(t,x)=N

j=0uj(t)ϕj(x) andv(t,x)=N

j=0vj(t)ϕj(x), where

ϕj(x)=χ[jh,(j+1)h)(x)=

1, x

jh, (j+ 1)h, 0, x

jh, (j+ 1)h. (1.2) We write f,g,u0,v0as

f(t,x)=

N j=0

fj(t)ϕj(x), g(t,x)=

N j=0

gj(t)ϕj(x),

u0(x)=

N j=0

uj0ϕj(x), v0(x)=

N j=0

vj0ϕj(x),

(1.3)

where fj(t)= f(t,jh),gj(t)=g(t,jh),uj0=u0(jh), andvj0=v0(jh).

(3)

Then forujandvjwe obtain the system uj+vjvj1

h +Aujfj, j=1,N, vj+uj+1uj

h +Bvj

gj, j=0,N1,

(1.4)

with the conditionsv0= −α(u0),uN=β(vN),uj(0)=uj0,j=1,N, andvj(0)=vj0, j= 0,N1.

For a unitary writing, we takej=1,N1 in both equations of the above system and then the extreme conditions becomev0= −α(u1) anduN=β(vN1) (they do not show u0andvN). By passingNN+ 1 and taking different stepshj, we obtain the system (S) inuj,vj,j=1,Nwithv0= −α(u1),uN+1=β(vN) (α=α,β=β), andH=R.

In this way the study of the partial differential system (S) reduces to the study of the ordinary differential system (S) (withH=Randhj=h, for all j). The solution uj,vj

depends onhand it seems thatu(t,x) =

uj(t)ϕj(x),v(t, x)=

vj(t)ϕj(x) approximate the solutionu,vof the system (S). We will not study here the convergence of the solution

u,vtou,v, but we will investigate the well-posedness of the discrete problem (S) + (EC) + (ID).

We will also study the discrete system that corresponds to (S) forx(0,) with the boundary condition

v(t, 0)= −αu(t, 0), t >0, (BC)1

and initial data

u(0,x)=u0(x), v(0,x)=v0(x), x >0. (IC)1

More precisely we will investigate the infinite discrete hyperbolic system dun

dt +vnvn1

h +Aun fn, dvn

dt +un+1un

h +Bvn

gn, n=1, 2,. . .,t[0,T], inH,

(S)

with the extreme condition

v0(t)= −αu1(t), t[0,T], (EC) and initial data

un(0)=un0, vn(0)=vn0, n=1, 2,. . . . (ID) Although the proposed problems appeared by discretization of the problem (S) + (BC) + (IC) and the corresponding one forx(0,), our problems also cover some nonlinear differential systems in Hilbert spaces.

(4)

For other classes of difference and differential equations in abstract spaces we refer the reader to [1,2,10].

InSection 2we recall some definitions and results from the theory of maximal mono- tone operators that we need to prove our results. In Sections3and4we study the prob- lems (S) + (EC) + (ID) and (S) + ( EC) + ( ID).

2. Notations and preliminaries

Let H be a real Hilbert space with the scalar product ·,· and the associated norm · . We denote byandthe strong and weak convergence inH, respectively. For a multivalued operatorA:HH we denote byD(A)= {xH;A(x)= ∅}its domain and byR(A)= ∪{A(x); xD(A)}its range. The operatorAis identified with its graph G(A)= {[x,y]H×H;xD(A), yR(A)} ⊂H×H.

We use forAthe notationA:D(A)HH. IfA,BHHandλRthen λA=

[x,λy]; yA(x), D(λA)=D(A), A+B=

[x,y+z]; yA(x),zA(x), D(A+B)=D(A)D(B). (2.1) The operatorA:D(A)HH is monotone if for allx1,x2D(A) and y1A(x1), y2A(x2) we havey1y2,x1x20.

An operatorA:HHsingle-valued and everywhere defined is hemicontinuous if for allx,yHwe haveA(x+t y)A(x), ast0. The operatorA:D(A)HHis demi- continuous if it is strongly weakly continuous, that is, if ([xn,yn])nAwithxnx, as n→ ∞andyny, asn→ ∞, then [x,y]A.

A demicontinuous operator is also hemicontinuous.

The operatorA:D(A)HHis maximal monotone if it is maximal in the set of all monotone operators, that is,Ais monotone and, as subset ofH×H, it is not properly contained in any other monotone subset ofH×H.

The monotone operatorA:D(A)HH is maximal monotone if and only if for anyλ >0 (equivalently for someλ >0),R(I+λA)=H.

IfA:HH is everywhere defined, single-valued, monotone, and hemicontinuous, then it is maximal monotone.

IfA:D(A)HH is maximal monotone andB:HH is everywhere defined, single-valued, monotone, and hemicontinuous, thenA+Bis maximal monotone.

For a maximal monotone operatorA:D(A)HH, the operators Jλ=(I+λA)1:H−→H, λ >0, Aλ=1

λ IJλ

:H−→H, λ >0, (2.2)

are the resolvent and the Yosida approximation ofA.

For an operator A:D(A)HH, f : (0,)H and u0H, we consider the Cauchy problem

du

dt(t) +Au(t) f(t), t >0,u(0)=u0. (CP)

(5)

The functionuC([0,T];H) is strong solution for the problem (CP) ifuis absolutely continuous on every compact of (0,T),u(t)D(A), for a.a.t(0,T),u(0)=u0, andu satisfies (CP)1for a.a.t(0,T).

The functionuC([0,T];H) is weak solution for the problem (CP) if there exist (un)nW1,(0,T;H) and (fn)nL1(0,T;H) such that

dun

dt (t) +Aun(t)fn(t), for a.a.t(0,T),n=1, 2,. . ., (2.3) unu, asn→ ∞, inC([0,T];H),u(0)=u0, and fnf, asn→ ∞, inL1(0,T;H).

For other properties of the maximal monotone operators and for the main results of existence, uniqueness of the strong and weak solutions for the nonlinear evolution equations in Hilbert spaces, we refer the reader to [3,6,13].

3. The problem (S) + (EC) + (ID)

The assumptions we will use in this section are the following.

(H1) The operatorsA:D(A)HH,B:D(B)HH are maximal monotone, possibly multivalued, withD(A)= ∅,D(B)= ∅.

(H2) The operatorsα,β:HHare single-valued and maximal monotone.

(H3) The constantshj>0,j=1,N.

We will write our problem as a Cauchy problem in a certain Hilbert space, for we con- sider the Hilbert spaceX=H2N= {(u1,u2,. . .,uN,v1,v2,. . .,vN)T; uj,vjH, j=1,N} with the scalar product

u1,. . .,uN,v1,. . .,vNT,u1,. . .,uN,v1,. . .,vNTX=

N j=1

hjuj,uj+vj,vj (3.1)

and the corresponding norm · X.

We introduce the operatorᏭ:D(Ꮽ)XX,

u1,u2,. . .,uN,v1,v2,. . .,vNT

=v1+αu1

h1 ,v2v1

h2

,. . .,vNvN1

hN ,u2u1

h1 ,u3u2

h2

,. . .,βvNuN hN

T

. (3.2)

BecauseD(α)=D(β)=H, we deduce thatD(Ꮽ)=X.

We also define the operatorᏮ:D(Ꮾ)XX,D(Ꮾ)=D(A)N×D(B)N, Ꮾu1,u2,. . .,uN,v1,v2,. . .,vNT

=

γ12,. . .,γN,δ12,. . .,δNT;γiAui,δiBvi,i=1,N. (3.3)

(6)

Using the operatorsᏭandᏮ, our problem can be equivalently expressed as the fol- lowing Cauchy problem in the spaceX

dU

dt (t) +ᏭU(t)+ᏮU(t)F(t), U(0)=U0, (P) where U = (u1,u2,. . .,uN,v1,. . .,vN)T, U0 = (u10,u20,. . .,uN0,v10,. . .,vN0)T, F =(f1,

f2,. . .,fN,g1,. . .,gN)T.

Lemma 3.1. If the assumptions (H2) and (H3) hold, then the operatoris monotone and demicontinuous; so it is maximal monotone.

Proof. The operatorᏭis defined onXand it is single-valued.Ꮽis monotone, because Ꮽ(U)Ꮽ(U),UUX

=

N j=1

hj

vjvj1vj+vj1

hj ,ujuj

+

N j=1

hj

uj+1ujuj+1+uj

hj ,vjvj

=

v1+αu1

v1αu1

,u1u1

+

N j=2

vjvj,ujuj

vj1vj1,ujuj

+

N1 j=1

uj+1uj+1,vjvjujuj,vjvj

+βvNuNβvN+uN,vNvN

=

v1v1,u1u1

+αu1

αu1

,u1u1

u1u1,v1v1

+vNvN,uNuN +βvN

βvN

,vNvN

uNuN,vNvN

= αu1

αu1

,u1u1

+βvN

βvN

,vNvN

0,

(3.4)

with v0 = −α(u1), v0 = −α(u1), uN+1=β(vN), uN+1=β(vN+1), for all U =(u1,u2, . . .,uN,v1,. . .,vN)T,U=(u1,u2,. . .,uN,v1,. . .,vN)TX.

The operatorᏭis also demicontinuous, that is, ifUnU0andᏭ(Un)V0, then V0=Ꮽ(U0). Indeed, letUn=(un1,un2,. . .,unN,v1n,. . .,vnN),U0=(u01,u02,. . .,u0N,v10,. . .,vN0), UnU0 and Ꮽ(Un)=((v1n+α(un1))/h1, (v2nv1n)/h2,. . ., (vNn vNn1)/hN, (un2un1)/

h1,. . ., (β(vnN)unN)/hN)T,V0=(x01,x20,. . .,x0N,y10,. . .,yN0)T,Ꮽ(Un)V0.

(7)

FromUnU0we deduce that

unj−→u0j, vnj −→v0j, forn−→ ∞,j=1,N. (3.5) BecauseᏭ(Un)V0, we getᏭ(Un),YXV0,YX, for allYX,Y=12,. . .,αN, β1,. . .,βN)T, that is,

vn1+αun11

−→h1

x10,α1

, vnjvnj1j

−→hj x0jj

, j=2,N, unjunj1,βj1

−→hj1

y0j1j1

, j=2,N, βvnNunNN

−→hN

yN0,βN

, inH,

=⇒v1n+αun1 h1x01 , (3.6)

vnjvnj1 hjx0j, j=2,N,

unjunj1 hj1y0j1, j=2,N, (3.7) βvnNunN hNyN0, inH, asn−→ ∞. (3.8) From the relations (3.5) and (3.7) we obtainx0j=(v0jv0j1)/hj,j=2,N,y0j1=(u0j u0j1)/hj1, j=2,N. Becauseαandβare demicontinuous, by (3.5), (3.6), and (3.8) we deduce

h1x01v01=αu01, hNyN0 +u0N=βv0N=⇒x01=v01+αu01

h1 , yN0 =βv0Nu0N hN .

(3.9) ThereforeV0=Ꮽ(U0). Hence the operatorᏭis demicontinuous (so it is also hemicon- tinuous) and, by [6, Proposition 2.4] we deduce that it is maximal monotone.

Lemma 3.2. If the assumptions (H1) and (H3) hold, then the operatoris maximal mono- tone inX.

Proof. The operatorᏮis evidently monotone ZZ,UUX=

N j=1

hj

γjγj,ujuj

+δjδj,vjvj

0, (3.10)

for allU=(u1,u2,. . .,uN,v1,. . .,vN)T,U=(u1,u2,. . .,uN,v1,. . .,vN)TD(Ꮾ),ZᏮ(U), ZᏮ(U), for allγjA(uj),γjA(uj),δjB(vj),δjB(vj), j=1,N.

It is also maximal monotone inX. Indeed, by [6, Proposition 2.2] it is sufficient (and necessary) to show that forλ >0,R(I+λᏮ)=Xfor allY X,Y=(x1,x2,. . .,xN,y1,. . ., yN)Tthere existsUX,U=(u1,u2,. . .,uN,v1,. . .,vN)T such that

U+λᏮ(U)Y. (3.11)

(8)

The last relation gives us uj+λγj=xj, j=1,N, vj+λδj=yj, j=1,N, =⇒

uj=

I+λA1xj

=JλAxj

, j=1,N, vj=

I+λB1yj=JλByj, j=1,N, (3.12) whereγjA(uj),δjB(vj) j=1,N, andJλA andJλBare the resolvents ofAandB, re- spectively (AandBare maximal monotone). ThenU=(u1,. . .,uN,v1,. . .,vN)T, whereuj

andvj,j=1,N, defined above, satisfy our condition (3.11).

We give now the main result for our initial problem (S) + (EC) + (ID).

Theorem 3.3. Assume that the assumptions (H1)–(H3) hold. Ifuj0D(A), for all j= 1,N, vj0D(B), for all j=1,N, and fj,gjW1,1(0,T;H), j=1,N, then there exist unique functionsujandvjW1,(0,T;H), j=1,N,uj(t)D(A),vj(t)D(B), for all j=1,N, for allt[0,T], which verify the system (S) for everyt[0,T), the condition (EC) for everyt[0,T), and the initial data (ID).

Moreoveruj andvj,j=1,N, are everywhere differentiable from right in the topology of Hand

d+uj

dt =

fjAuj

vjvj1

hj

0

, j=1,N, d+vj

dt =

gjBvj

uj+1uj

hj

0

, j=1,N,t[0,T),

(3.13)

withv0(t)= −α(u1(t)),uN+1(t)=β(vN(t)),t[0,T).

Proof. Because the operatorᏮis maximal monotone inXandᏭis single-valued, with D(Ꮽ)=X, monotone, and hemicontinuous, by [3, Corollary 1.3, Chapter II] we deduce thatᏭ+Ꮾ:D(Ꮾ)XX is maximal monotone. By [3, Theorem 2.2, Corollary 2.1, Chapter III] we deduce that, forU0D(Ꮾ) andFW1,1(0,T;X), the problem (P) has a unique solutionU=(u1,u2,. . .,uN,v1,. . .,vN)T W1,(0,T;X),U(t)D(Ꮾ), for all t[0,T). We consider (P)1in the interval [0,T+ε],ε >0, (by extending correspondingly the functions fjandgj,j=1,N) and we getU(T)D(Ꮾ).

The solutionUis everywhere differentiable from right and d+U

dt (t)=

F(t)U(t)U(t)0, t[0,T), (3.14) that is, the relations from theorem are verified. In addition we have

d+U dt (t)

XF(0)U0

U0

0

X+ t

0

dF ds(s)

Xds, t[0,T).

(3.15)

(9)

IfUandV are the solutions of (P) corresponding to (U0,F), (V0,G)D(Ꮾ)×W1,1(0, T;X), then

U(t)V(t)XU0V0

X+ t

0

F(s)G(s)Xds, t[0,T]. (3.16) Remark 3.4. IfU0D(Ꮾ)=D(A)N×D(B)NandFL1(0,T;X), then, by [3, Corollary 2.2, Chapter III], the problem (P)(S) + (EC) + (ID) has a unique weak solutionU C([0,T];X), that is, there exist (Fn)nW1,1(0,T;X),FnF, asn→ ∞, inL1(0,T;X) and (Un)nW1,(0,T;X),Un(0)=U0,UnU, asn→ ∞inC([0,T];X), strong solutions for the problems

dUn

dt (t) + (Ꮽ+Ꮾ)Un(t)Fn(t), for a.a.t(0,T),n=1, 2,. . . . (3.17) 4. The problem (S) + ( EC) + ( ID)

We present the assumptions that we will use in this section as follows.

(H1) The operators A:D(A)HH and B:D(B)HH are maximal mono- tone, 0A(0), 0B(0), and there exista1,a2>0 such that

γa1u, uD(A),γA(u); δa2u, uD(B), δB(u).

(4.1) (H2) The operator α:HHis single-valued and maximal monotone.

(H3) The constant h >0.

We consider the spaceY=lh2(H)×l2h(H), wherel2h(H)= {(un)nH;n=1un2<∞}

(=l2(H)), with the scalar product un

n,vn

n

,un

n,vn

n

Y=

un

n,un

n

l2h(H)+vn

n,vn

n

l2h(H)

=

n=1

hun,un+

n=1

hvn,vn. (4.2)

We define the operator :YY, Ꮽun

n,vn

n

=

vnvn1

h

n

,

un+1un h

n

, withv0= −αu1

, (4.3)

and the operator :D(Ꮾ) YY, Ꮾunn,vnn=

γnn,δnnY,γnAun,δnBvn,n1, (4.4) withD(Ꮾ) = {((un)n, (vn)n)Y;unD(A), vnD(B), n1}.

(10)

Lemma 4.1. If the assumptions (H2) and (H3) hold, then the operator is monotone and demicontinuous inY.

Proof. First we observe that is well-defined inY. If ((un)n, (vn)n)Y, thenᏭ((u n)n, (vn)n)Y, andD(Ꮽ) =Y.

The operatorᏭ is monotone, because

unn,vnnunn,vnn,unn,vnn

unn,vnnY

=

vnvn1

h

n

vnvn1

h

n

,unun

n

l2h(H)

+

un+1un

h

nun+1un

h

n,vnvnn

l2h(H)

= αu1

αu1

,u1u1

0.

(4.5)

Next we prove thatᏭ is demicontinuous, that is, if unj

n,vnj

n

−→

u0nn,vn0n, forj−→ ∞inY, (4.6) Ꮽunj

n,vnj

n

xnn,ynn, forj−→ ∞inY, (4.7) then ((xn)n, (yn)n)=Ꮽ((u 0n)n, (v0n)n).

From (4.6) we deduce

hunj

n

u0nn2l2(H)+hvnj

n

v0nn2l2(H)−→0, forj−→ ∞ =⇒

unj

n

u0nnl2(H)−→0, for j−→ ∞ vnj

n

v0nnl2(H)−→0, forj−→ ∞=⇒

n=1

unju0n2−→0, forj−→ ∞

n=1

vnjvn02−→0, for j−→ ∞

=⇒unj−→u0n, forj−→ ∞,n, vnj−→vn0, for j−→ ∞,n.

(4.8)

Then by (4.7) we have Ꮽunj

n,vnj

n

,αnn,βnnY

−→

xn

n,yn

n

,αn

n,βn

n

Y, asj−→ ∞, αn

n,βn

n

Y,

=⇒

vnjvnj1 h

n

,

un+1j unj

h

n

,αn

n,βn

n

Y

,

参照

関連したドキュメント

L\&#34;u, Positive solutions for boundary value problem on nonlinear fractional. differential equation, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and

Soriano, Existence and uniform decay rates for viscoelastic problems with nonlinear boundary damping, Differential Integral Equations 14 (2001), no.. Soriano, Exponential decay for

Wood, Large solutions of semilinear elliptic equations with nonlinear gradient terms, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 22 (1999), no. Walter,

Malaguti, “On a nonlocal boundary value problem for second order nonlinear singular differential equations,” Georgian Mathematical Journal, vol. Webb, “Positive solutions of

Lomtatidze, “On certain boundary value problems for second-order linear ordinary differential equations with singularities,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,

Tskhovrebadze, On two-point boundary value problems for systems of higher- order ordinary differential equations with singularities, Georgian Mathematical Journal 1 (1994),

[5] Showalter R.E., Monotone operators in Banach space and nonlinear partial differential equations, AMS, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol.

Bessila, A modified quasi-boundary value method for ill-posed problems, Jour- nal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 301 (2005), no.. Filinkov, Operator-Differential Equations