volume 6, issue 4, article 92, 2005.
Received 07 April, 2005;
accepted 06 June, 2005.
Communicated by:B. Yang
Abstract Contents
JJ II
J I
Home Page Go Back
Close Quit
Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics
ON HARDY-HILBERT INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES WITH SOME PARAMETERS
YONG HONG
Department of Mathematics Guangdong Business College Guangzhou 510320
People’s Republic of China EMail:hongyong59@sohu.com
2000c Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 109-05
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page2of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Abstract
In this paper, we give a new Hardy-Hilbert’s integral inequality with some pa- rameters and a best constant factor. It includes an overwhelming majority of results of many papers.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:26D15.
Key words: Hardy-Hilbert’s integral inequality, Weight, Parameter, Best constant fac- tor,β-function,Γ-function.
Contents
1 Introduction and Main Result . . . 3
2 Weight Function and Lemmas. . . 8
3 Proofs of the Theorems. . . 10
4 Some Corollaries. . . 16 References
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page3of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
1. Introduction and Main Result
Let 1p + 1q = 1(p > 1), f ≥ 0, g ≥ 0, 0 < R∞
0 fp(x)dx < +∞, 0 <
R∞
0 gq(x)dx <+∞, then we have the well known Hardy-Hilbert inequality (1.1)
Z ∞ 0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(x) x+y dxdy
< π sin
π p
Z ∞
0
fp(x)dx
1pZ ∞ 0
gq(x)dx 1q
;
and an equivalent form as:
(1.2)
Z ∞ 0
Z ∞ 0
f(x) x+ydx
p
dy <
π sin
π p
p
Z ∞ 0
fp(x)dx.
In recent years, many results have been obtained in the research of these two inequalities (see [1] – [13]). Yang [1] and [2] gave:
(1.3) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(y) (x+y)λdxdy
< B
p+λ−2
p ,p+λ−2 q
× Z ∞
0
x1−λfp(x)dx
1pZ ∞ 0
x1−λgq(x)dx 1q
,
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page4of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
whereB(r, s)is theβ-function; and Kuang [3] gave:
(1.4) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(x) xλ+yλ dxdy
< π
λsin1p π
pλ
sin1q
π qλ
Z ∞
0
x1−λfp(x)dx
1pZ ∞ 0
x1−λgq(x)dx 1q
.
Recently, Hong [4] gave:
(1.5) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(x) px2+y2dxdy
≤ 1 2√
πΓ 1
2p
Γ 1
2q
Z ∞ 0
fp(x)dx
1pZ ∞ 0
gq(x)dx 1q
. And Yang [5] gave:
(1.6) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(x) xλ+yλ dxdy
< π λsin
π p
Z ∞
0
x(p−1)(1−λ)fp(x)dx
1pZ ∞ 0
x(q−1)(1−λ)gq(x)dx 1q
;
(1.7) Z ∞
0
yλ−1 Z ∞
0
f(x) xλ+yλdx
p
dy
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page5of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
<
π λsin
π p
p
Z ∞ 0
x(p−1)(1−λ)fp(x)dx.
These results generalize and improve (1.1) and (1.2) in a certain degree.
In this paper, by introducing a few parameters, we obtain a new Hardy- Hilbert integral inequality with a best constant factor, which is a more extended inequality, and includes all the results above and the overwhelming majority of results of many recent papers.
Our main result is as follows:
Theorem 1.1. If 1p + 1q = 1 (p > 1), α > 0, λ > 0, m, n ∈ R, such that 0<1−mp < αλ,0<1−nq < αλ, andf ≥0,g ≥0, satisfy
(1.8) 0<
Z ∞ 0
x(1−αλ)+p(n−m)
fp(x)dx <∞,
(1.9) 0<
Z ∞ 0
y(1−αλ)+q(m−n)
gq(y)dy <∞, then
(1.10) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(x) (xα+yα)λdxdy
< Hλ,α(m, n, p, q) Z ∞
0
x(1−αλ)+p(n−m)
fp(x)dx 1p
× Z ∞
0
y(1−αλ)+q(m−n)
gq(y)dy 1q
;
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page6of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
and
(1.11) Z ∞
0
y(1−αλ)+q(m−n) 1−q
Z ∞ 0
f(x) (xα+yα)λdx
p
dy
<Heλ,α(m, n, p, q) Z ∞
0
x(1−αλ)+p(n−m)
fp(x)dx, where
Hλ,α(m, n, p, q) = 1 αB1p
1−mp
α , λ− 1−mp α
B1q
1−nq
α , λ− 1−nq α
and
Heλ,α(m, n, p, q) = 1 αpB
1−mp
α , λ−1−mp α
Bp−1
1−nq
α , λ− 1−nq α
. Theorem 1.2. If p > 1, 1p + 1q = 1, α > 0, λ > 0, m, n ∈ R, such that 0<1−mp < αλ,mp+nq= 2−αλ, andf(x)≥0,g(y)≥0, satisfy
(1.12) 0<
Z ∞ 0
xn(p+q)−1fp(x)dx <∞,
(1.13) 0<
Z ∞ 0
ym(p+q)−1gq(y)dy <∞,
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page7of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
then
(1.14) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(x)
(xα+yα)λdxdy < 1 αB
1−mp
α , λ− 1−mp α
× Z ∞
0
xn(p+q)−1fp(x)dx
1pZ ∞ 0
ym(p+q)−1gq(y)dy 1q
;
(1.15) Z ∞
0
ym(p+q)−11−q Z ∞
0
f(x) (xα+yα)λdx
p
dy
< 1 αpBp
1−mp
α , λ− 1−mp α
Z ∞ 0
xn(p+q)−1fp(x)dx, where the constant factors α1B 1−mpα , λ−1−mpα
in (1.14) and
1
αpBp 1−mpα , λ− 1−mpα
in (1.15) are the best possible.
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page8of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
2. Weight Function and Lemmas
The weight function is defined as follows ωλ,α(m, n, y) =
Z ∞ 0
1
(xα+yα)λ · yn
xmdx, y∈(0,+∞).
Lemma 2.1. Ifα >0,λ >0,m∈R,0<1−m < αλ, then (2.1) ωλ,α(m, n, y) = 1
αy(1−αλ)+(n−m)
B
1−m
α , λ−1−m α
. Proof. Settingt = xyαα, then
ωλ,α(m, n, y) = 1 α
Z ∞ 0
1
(1 +t)λy(1−αλ)+(n−m)
t1−mα −1dt
= 1
αy(1−αλ)+(n−m)
Z ∞ 0
1
(1 +t)λt1−mα −1dt
= 1
αy(1−αλ)+(n−m)
B
1−m
α , λ−1−m α
. Hence (2.1) is valid. The lemma is proved.
Lemma 2.2. Ifα >0, λ >0, β <1, a∈R, then (2.2)
Z ∞ 1
1 x1+ε
Z xα1
0
1
(1 +t)λt1−βα −1−aεdtdx=O(1), (ε→0+).
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page9of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
Proof. Since(1−β)/α >0,forεsmall enough, such that 1−βα −aε >0,then Z ∞
1
1 x1+ε
Z xα1
0
1
(1 +t)λt1−βα −1−aεdtdx <
Z ∞ 1
1 x
Z xα1
0
t(1−βα −aε)−1dtdx
= 1
1−β−aεα Z ∞
1
xβ+aεα−2dx
= 1
(1−β−aεα)2. Hence (2.2) is valid.
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page10of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
3. Proofs of the Theorems
Proof of Theorem1.1. By Hölder’s inequality and Lemma2.1, we have
G= Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(y) (xα+yα)λdxdy
= Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x) (xα+yα)λ/p
xn ym
g(y) (xα+yα)λ/q
ym xn
dxdy
≤ Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
fp(x) (xα+yα)λ
xnp ymp
1pZ ∞ 0
Z ∞ 0
gq(x) (xα+yα)λ
ymq xnqdxdy
1q , (3.1)
according to the condition of taking equality in Hölder’s inequality, if (3.1) takes equality, then there exists a constantC, such that
fp(x) (xα+yα)λ
xnp ymp
gq(y) (xα+yα)λ
ymq xnq
≡C,a.e. (x, y)∈(0,+∞)×(0,+∞) it follows that
fp(x)xn(p+q)≡Cgq(y)ym(p+q)≡C1(constant), a.e. (x, y)∈(0,+∞)×(0,+∞) hence
Z ∞ 0
x(1−αλ)+p(n−m)
fp(x)dx
= Z ∞
0
x(1−αλ)+n(p+q)−nq−mp
fp(x)dx
=C1 Z ∞
0
x(1−αλ)−np−mq
dx
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page11of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
=C1 Z 1
0
x(1−αλ)−np−mq
dx+C1 Z ∞
1
x(1−αλ)−np−mq
dx= +∞, which contradicts (1.8) and (1.9). Hence, by (3.1), we have
G <
Z ∞ 0
Z ∞ 0
1 (xα+yα)λ
xnp ympdy
fp(x)dx 1p
× Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
1 (xα+yα)λ
ymq xnqdy
gq(y)dy 1q
= 1
α Z ∞
0
x(1−αλ)+p(n−m)
B
1−mp
α , λ− 1−mp α
fp(x)dx 1p
× 1
α Z ∞
0
y(1−αλ)+q(m−n)
B
1−nq
α , λ−1−nq α
gq(y)dy 1q
=Hλ,α(m, n, p, q) Z ∞
0
x(1−αλ)+p(n−m)
fp(x)dx 1p
× Z ∞
0
y(1−αλ)+q(m−n)
gq(y)dy 1q
. Hence (1.10) is vaild.
Letβ = [(1−αλ) +q(m−n)]/(1−q),and
eg(y) =yβ Z ∞
0
f(x) (xα+yα)λdx
pq .
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page12of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
By (1.10), we have Z ∞
0
y(1−αλ)+q(m−n)
egq(y)dy
= Z ∞
0
yβ(1−q)egq(y)dy
= Z ∞
0
yβ Z ∞
0
f(x) (xα+yα)λdx
p
dy
= Z ∞
0
yβ Z ∞
0
f(x) (xα+yα)λdx
pq Z ∞ 0
f(x) (xα+yα)λdx
dy
= Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)eg(y) (xα+yα)λdxdy
< Hλ,α(m, n, p, q) Z ∞
0
x(1−αλ)+p(n−m)
fp(x)dx 1p
× Z ∞
0
y(1−αλ)+q(m−n)
egq(y)dy|
1q , It follows that
Z ∞ 0
y(1−αλ)+q(m−n) 1−q
Z ∞ 0
f(x) (xα+yα)λdx
p
dy
<Heλ,α(m, n, p, q) Z ∞
0
x(1−αλ)+p(n−m)
fp(x)dx.
Hence, (1.11) is valid.
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page13of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
Proof of Theorem1.2. Since0<1−mp < αλ, mp+nq = 2−αλ,then 0<1−nq < αλ,
(1−αλ) +p(n−m) =n(p+q)−1, (1−αλ) +q(m−n) = m(p+q)−1,
1−mp
α =λ− 1−nq α . By Theorem1.1, (1.14) and (1.15) are valid.
Forε >0,setting f0(x) =
( x[−n(p+q)−ε]/p, x≥1;
0, 0≤x <1,
and
g0(y) =
( y[−m(p+q)−ε]/q, y ≥1;
0, 0≤y <1.
We have
(3.2) 0<
Z ∞ 0
xn(p+q)−1f0p(x)dx= Z ∞
1
x−1−εdx= 1 ε <∞,
(3.3) 0<
Z ∞ 0
ym(p+q)−1gq0(y)dy= Z ∞
1
y−1−εdy = 1 ε <∞.
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page14of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Z ∞ 0
Z ∞ 0
f0(x)g0(y) (xα+yα)λdxdy
= Z ∞
1
Z ∞ 1
1
(xα+yα)λx−n(p+q)+εp y−m(p+q)+εq dxdy
= Z ∞
1
x−n(p+q)+εp Z ∞
1
1
(xα+yα)λy−m(p+q)+εq dydx
= 1 α
Z ∞ 1
1 x1+ε
Z ∞
1 xα
1
(1 +t)λt1−mpα −1−qαε dtdx
= 1 α
Z ∞ 1
1 x1+ε
Z ∞ 0
1
(1 +t)λt1−mtα −1−qαε dtdx
− Z ∞
1
1 x1+ε
Z xα1
0
1
(1 +t)λt1−mtα −1−qαε dtdx
# . By Lemma2.2, whenε→0,we have
Z ∞ 1
1 x1+ε
Z xα1
0
1
(1 +t)λt1−mpα −1−qαε dtdx=O(1).
Since Z ∞
0
1
(1 +t)λt1−mpα −1−qαε dt=B
1−mp
α , λ− 1−mp α
+o(1),
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page15of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
we have Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f0(x)g0(y)
(xα+yα)λdxdy = 1 α
1 ε
B
1−mp
α , λ− 1−mp α
+o(1)
−O(1)
= 1 ε
1 αB
1−mp
α , λ− 1−mp α
−o(1)
= 1 εαB
1−mp
α , λ− 1−mp α
(1−o(1)).
(3.4)
If the constant α1B 1−mpα , λ− 1−mpα
in (1.14) is not the best possible, then there exists a K < α1B 1−mpα , λ− 1−mpα
,such that (1.14) still is valid when we replace α1B 1−mpα , λ− 1−mpα
byK. By (3.2), (3.3) and (3.4), we find 1
εαB
1−mp
α , λ− 1−mp α
(1−o(1))
< K Z ∞
0
xn(p+q)−1f0p(x)dx
1pZ ∞ 0
ym(p+q)−1gq0(y)dy 1q
=K1 ε. For ε → 0+, we have α1B 1−mpα , λ− 1−mpα
≤ K, which contradicts the fact thatK < α1B 1−mpα , λ− 1−mpα
. It follows thatα1B 1−mpα , λ− 1−mpα
in (1.14) is the best possible.
Since (1.14) is equivalent to (1.15), then the constant α1pBp 1−mpα , λ− 1−mpα in (1.15) is the best possible. The theorem is proved.
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page16of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
4. Some Corollaries
When we take the appropriate parameters, many new inequalities can be ob- tained as follows:
Corollary 4.1. If 1p + 1q = 1 (p > 1), α > 0, λ > 0, f ≥ 0, g ≥ 0, and x(1−αλ)(p−1)/pf(x)∈Lp(0,+∞),x(1−αλ)(q−1)/qg(x)∈Lq(0,+∞), then
(4.1) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(y) (xα+yα)λdxdy
<
Γ
λ p
Γ
λ q
αΓ(λ)
Z ∞ 0
x(1−αλ)(p−1)
fp(x)dx 1p
× Z ∞
0
x(1−αλ)(q−1)
gq(x)dx 1q
;
(4.2) Z ∞
0
yα−1 Z ∞
0
f(x) (xα+yα)λdx
p
dy
<
Γ
λ p
Γ
λ q
αΓ(λ)
p
Z ∞ 0
x(1−αλ)(p−1)
fp(x)dx,
where the constantsΓ
λ p
Γ
λ q
.
(αΓ(λ))in (4.1) andh Γ
λ p
Γ
λ q
.
(αΓ(λ))ip
in (4.2) are the best possible.
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page17of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
Proof. If we takem= 1p −αλp2, n= 1q −αλq2 in Theorem1.2, (4.1) and (4.2) can be obtained.
Corollary 4.2. If1p+1q = 1 (p >1), λ >0, f ≥0, g≥0andx(1−λ)(p−1)/pf(x)∈ Lp(0,+∞), x(1−λ)(q−1)/qg(x)∈Lq(0,+∞), then
(4.3) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(y) (x+y)λdxdy
<
Γ
λ p
Γ
λ q
Γ(λ)
Z ∞ 0
x(1−λ)(p−1)fp(x)dx
1pZ ∞ 0
x(1−λ)(q−1)gq(x)dx 1q
,
(4.4)
Z ∞ 0
Z ∞ 0
f(x) (x+y)λdx
p
dy
<
Γ
λ p
Γ
λ q
Γ(λ)
p
Z ∞ 0
x(1−λ)(p−1)fp(x)dx,
where Γ
λ p
Γ
λ q
.
Γ(λ) in (4.3) and h
Γ
λ p
Γ
λ q
.
Γ(λ)ip
in (4.4) are the best possible.
Proof. If we takeα= 1in Corollary4.1, (4.3) and (4.4) can be obtained.
Corollary 4.3. If 1p + 1q = 1 (p > 1), λ > 0, p+λ−2 > 0, q+λ−2 > 0,
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page18of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
f ≥0, g ≥0, andx(1−λ)/pf(x)∈Lp(0,+∞), x(1−λ)/qg(x)∈Lq(0,+∞), then (4.5)
Z ∞ 0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(y) (x+y)λdxdy
< B
p+λ−2
p ,q+λ−2 q
Z ∞ 0
x1−λfp(x)
1pZ ∞ 0
x1−λgq(x)dx 1q
,
(4.6) Z ∞
0
y1−λ1−q Z ∞
0
f(x) (x+y)λdx
p
dy
< Bp
p+λ−2
p ,q+λ−2 q
Z ∞ 0
x1−λfp(x)dx, where Bp+λ−2
p ,q+λ−2q
in (4.5) andBpp+λ−2
p ,q+λ−2q
in (4.6) are the best possible.
Proof. If we takeα = 1, m =n = 2−λpq in Theorem1.2, (4.5) and (4.6) can be obtained.
Corollary 4.4. If 1p +1q = 1 (p >1), α >0, f ≥0, g ≥0, andx(1−α)/pf(x)∈ Lp(0,+∞), x(1−α)/qg(x)∈Lq(0,+∞), then
(4.7) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(x) xα+yα dxdy
< π
αsin1p
π pα
sin1q
π qα
Z ∞
0
x1−αfp(x)dx
pZ ∞ 0
x1−αgq(x)dx q
,
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page19of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
(4.8) Z ∞
0
y1−α1−q Z ∞
0
f(x) xα+yαdx
p
dy
<
π αsin1p
π pα
sin1q
π qα
p
Z ∞ 0
x1−αfp(x)dx.
Proof. If we takeλ = 1, m = n = pq1, in Theorem1.1, (4.7) and (4.8) can be obtained.
Corollary 4.5. If 1p + 1q = 1 (p > 1), α > 0, f ≥ 0, g ≥ 0, and f(x) ∈ Lp(0,+∞), g(x)∈Lq(0,+∞), then
(4.9) Z ∞
0
Z ∞ 0
f(x)g(x) (xα+yα)α1 dxdy
<
Γ 1
pα
Γ
1 qα
αΓ α1
Z ∞ 0
fp(x)dx
1pZ ∞ 0
gq(x)dx 1q
,
(4.10)
Z ∞ 0
Z ∞ 0
f(x) (xα+yα)α1 dx
!p
dy
<
Γ
1 pα
Γ
1 qα
αΓ α1
p
Z ∞ 0
fp(x)dx,
where Γ
1 pα
Γ
1 qα
.
αΓ α1
in (4.9) andh Γ
1 pα
Γ
1 qα
.
αΓ α1ip
in (4.10) are the best possible.
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page20of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Proof. If we takeλ = α1, m =n = pq1 in Theorem1.2, (4.9) and (4.10) can be obtained.
Remark 1. (4.1) and (4.2) are respectively generalizations of (1.6) and (1.7).
Forα= 1in (4.1) and (4.2), (1.6) and (1.7) can be obtained.
Remark 2. (4.3) and (4.4) are respectively generalizations of (1.1) and (1.2) . Remark 3. (4.5) is the result of [1] and [2]. (4.6) is a new inequality.
Remark 4. (4.7) is the result of [3]. (1.7) is a new inequality.
Remark 5. (4.9) is a generalization of (1.5). (4.10) is a new inequality.
For other appropriate values of parameters taken in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2, many new inequalities and the inequalities of [6] – [13] can yet be obtained.
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page21of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
References
[1] BICHENG YANG, A generalized Hardy-Hilbert’s inequality with a best constant factor, Chin. Ann. of Math. (China), 21A(2000), 401–408.
[2] BICHENG YANG, On Hardy-Hilbert’s intrgral inequality, J. Math. Anal.
Appl., 261 (2001), 295–306.
[3] JICHANG KUANG, On new extensions of Hilbert’s integtal inequality, Math. Anal. Appl., 235 (1999), 608–614.
[4] YONG HONG, All-sided Generalization about Hardy-Hilbert’s integral inequalities, Acta Math. Sinica (China), 44 (2001), 619–626.
[5] BICHENG YANG, On a generalization of Hardy-Hilbert’s inequality, Ann. of Math. (China), 23 (2002), 247–254.
[6] BICHENG YANG, On a generalization of Hardy-Hilbert’s integral in- eguality, Acta Math. Sinica (China), 41(4) (1998), 839–844.
[7] KE HU, On Hilbert’s inequality, Ann. of Math. (China), 13B (1992), 35–
39
[8] KE HU, On Hilbert’s inequality and it’s application, Adv. in Math.
(China), 22 (1993), 160–163.
[9] BICHENG YANG AND MINGZHE GAO, On a best value of Hardy- Hilbert’s inequality, Adv. in Math. (China), 26 (1999), 159–164.
On Hardy-Hilbert Integral Inequalities with Some
Parameters Yong Hong
Title Page Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back Close
Quit Page22of22
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(4) Art. 92, 2005
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
[10] MINGZHE GAO, An improvement of Hardy-Riesz’s extension of the Hilbert inequality, J. Mathematical Research and Exposition, (China) 14 (1994), 255–359.
[11] MINGZHE GAO AND BICHENG YANG, On the extended Hilbert’s in- equality, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 126 (1998), 751–759.
[12] BICHENG YANG AND L. DEBNATH, On a new strengtheaed Hardy- Hilbert’s intequality, Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci., 21 (1998): 403–
408.
[13] B.G. PACHPATTE, On some new inequalities similar to Hilbert’s inequal- ity, J. Math. Anal. & Appl., 226 (1998), 166–179.