Half-Bridge Drivers
A Transformer or an All-Silicon Drive?
Agenda
• Topologies using a half-bridge configuration
• The difference between soft and hard-switching
• The gate-drive transformer
• The all-silicon-solution
• Comparison
• Conclusions
Agenda
• Topologies using a half-bridge configuration
• The difference between soft and hard-switching
• The gate-drive transformer
• The all-silicon-solution
• Comparison
• Conclusions
Topology Trend for High Efficiency
• Soft Switching
– LLC-HB resonant – Active clamp forward – Active clamp flyback
– Asymmetrical half-bridge – Full bridge with phase shift
• Hard Switching – Flyback
– Forward – 2-sw flyback – 2-sw forward – Full bridge
LLC-HB
Active clamp Forward
Active clamp Flyback
AHB
FB Phase-shift
The High-Side Switch
• To achieve high efficiency, the topologies with ZVS (Zero- Voltage Switching) behavior are preferred.
• All the soft switching topologies implement the power switch with floating reference pin, e.g. the source pin of MOSFET.
• Why are MOSFETs used in soft switching applications?
– High frequency operation
– Body diode (current loop for ZVS)
How to drive the high side MOSFET?
Agenda
• Topologies using a half-bridge configuration
• The difference between soft and hard-switching
• The gate-drive transformer
• The all-silicon-solution
• Comparison
• Conclusions
D
G
S
Turn-on Procedure for Hard-switching
• Stages 2 and 3 dominate the switching losses of MOSFET and driver.
• DRV’s source capability as VGS is around VGS,Miller is important.
CDS CGD
CGS RG,I
RGATE RHI
VDRV
ID
VTH VGS
IG
VDS
ID
VGS,Miller
S1 S2 S3 S4 IG
The Miller plateau
The miller plateau is caused by CGD
D
G
S
Turn-off Procedure for Hard-switching
• Stages 2 and 3 dominate the switching losses of MOSFET and driver.
• DRV’s sink capability as VGS is around VGS,Miller is important.
CDS CGD
CGS RG,I
RGATE RLO
VDRV
ID
VTH VGS
IG
VDS
ID
VGS,Miller
S1 S2 S3 S4 IG
The Miller plateau
The miller plateau is caused by CGD
17
Vin 250
18
D1 1N4148
16
Resr 100m
C2 440uF
Rload 2.5
2 Vout
1
5
Ll 0.1uH Lp
1.75mH Rp 300m
Ip
RATIO_POW = -0.0667 RATIO_AUX = -0.0667
7
Aux
21
C5 10uF
22
R11 3.9k
C6 47pF
Isnub
R9 300m
Iout
3
Rg 15
13
Rsense 1
14
R13 C1 1k
470pF
23
Vgs
Vsense
12
Verr
11
Rupper 4.851k
Rlower 0.97k
9
R17 20k
C4 3.97nF C7
470pF 6 Vdrain
X1
MBRS340t3 Out
Out
Vramp
CMP FB OSC
SENS OUT GND
X2 PWMCM
10
D3 MUR160 Iclipp
Aux
R5 470 Rclamp
88k Cclamp 1.4nF
Δ
Vclipp
Vdrv
V1 Ipri
D2 1N4148
X3 IRF840
Simulation Circuit of Flyback
• Simulate the VGS, VDS, and IDS on Flyback.
IDS
0 4.00 8.00 12.0 16.0
vgs in voltsplot1
1
-100 100 300 500 700
vdrain in voltsplot3
2
1.01995m 1.02005m 1.02015m 1.02025m 1.02035m
time in seconds -400m
0 400m 800m 1.20
ipri in amperesplot2
3
VGS
VDS
IDS
Turn-on Simulation of Flyback
• VGS rises with Miller effect.
50 ns / div 200 mA / div
50 ns / div 200 V / div
50 ns / div 2 V / div
0 4.00 8.00 12.0 16.0
vgs in voltsplot1
1
-100 100 300 500 700
vdrain in voltsplot3
2
1.0244m 1.0246m 1.0248m 1.0250m 1.0252m
time in seconds -400m
0 400m 800m 1.20
ipri in amperesplot2
3
VGS
VDS
IDS
Turn-off Simulation of Flyback
• Turn off with Miller effect.
100 ns / div 200 mA / div
100 ns / div 200 V / div
100 ns / div 2 V / div
Turn-on Procedure for Soft-switching
• Because of ZVS, there is no Miller effect as turning on.
• The switching losses are dominated by
– The dead time (to reduce S1), and – Source capability to charge CGS to
reduce S2
• Less driver capability requirement.
VTH VGS
IG
VDS
ID
S1 S2 S3 ID depends on topology
-Vf
Turn-off Procedure for Soft-switching
• Similar as hard-switching: The Miller plateau exists as turning off.
• The difference is that IDS also reduces at this duration since IDS will go through the opposite MOSFET as VDS changes.
• To avoid overlap between 2 MOSFETs, minimize the duration of S1 ~ S4.
• Strong DRV’s sink capability is needed.
VTH VGS
IG
VDS
IDS
VGS,Miller
S1 S2 S3 S4
The Miller plateau
10 12
Ls {Ls}
2
Lmag {Lmag}
Cs {Cs}
1
4
X3 XFMR-TAP RATIO = 1/N ILmag
ICs Vcs
Δ VLmag
26
V3 {Vbulk}
23
B1 Voltage
V(G2) < 2.5 ? 0 :
15
24
B2 Voltage
?
19
Mlower Vbridge
Cs
Δ
22
Mupper
* WV3
R10 5m R11
15
R14 15
11
V4 IML
M2 IRF840
5
M1 IRF840
X12 MBR2045
X13 MBR2045
Δ YM1
V10 D2 IM1
1N4148
D3 1N4148
Simulation Circuit of LLC-HB
• Simulate the VGS_MU, VDS_MU, and IMU on LLC-HB
• To ease the reading of current, the direction of IMU and IML is referred to ICS.
IMU
ICS IML
Turn-on Simulation of LLC-HB
• VGS_ML off, ICS reduces VDS_MU for ZVS.
• VDS_MU is 0 V BEFORE VGS_MU, so VGS_MU rises smoothly.
-2.00 2.00 6.00 10.0 14.0
mlower, mupper in voltsplot1
1
2
0 100 200 300 400
ym1 in voltsplot2
3
10.1922m 10.1926m 10.1930m 10.1934m 10.1938m
time in seconds -2.00
-1.00 0 1.00 2.00
im1,iml in amperesplot3 4
5
VGS_MU VGS_ML
VDS_MU
I_ML I_MU
Not overlap; it is the current through CDS
200 ns / div 500 mA / div
200 ns / div 200 V / div
200 ns / div 2 V / div
Turn-off Simulation of LLC-HB
• Strong turn off capability is required.
-2.00 2.00 6.00 10.0 14.0
mlower, mupper in voltsPlot1
2 1
0 100 200 300 400
ym1 in voltsPlot2
3
10.1976m 10.1978m 10.1980m 10.1982m 10.1984m
time in seconds -2.00
-1.00 0 1.00 2.00
iml,im1 in amperesPlot3
45
VGS_ML VGS_MU
VDS_MU
I_MU VGS_ML
100 ns / div 500 mA / div
100 ns / div 200 V / div
100 ns / div 2 V / div
Driver Comparison between Hard-Switching and Soft-Switching
Accurate Accurate
Dead time accuracy requirement
High High
Sink capability requirement
Low Medium
Source capability requirement
Soft-switching Hard-switching
The Solutions for High-Side Driver
• Transformer-based solution
– Single DRV input – Dual DRV inputs
• Silicon integrated circuit driver: dual outputs
– Single DRV input – Dual DRV inputs
Agenda
• Topologies using a half-bridge configuration
• The difference between soft and hard-switching
• The gate-drive transformer
• The all-silicon-solution
• Comparison
• Conclusions
Consideration as Designing Driver Transformer
• Ground-referenced floating drive – keep 500 V isolation if a 400 V pre-regulated PFC exists.
• Minimize the leakage inductance - the delay between output and input windings may kill the power MOSFETs.
• Follow Faraday’s law – keep V*T constant, otherwise, saturate.
• Keep enough margin from saturation – the worst case happens with transient load at high line.
• High permeability ferrite – minimize the IM.
• Keep high sink current capability
Single DRV Input
• An ac coupling capacitor (CC) is needed to reset the driver transformer flux.
• The amplitude of VGS is dependent on duty. /
• With (-VC) to turn off at steady state, but the sink capability is limited at start-up. /
• Need a fast time constant (LM//RGS * CC) to avoid flux walking due to the fast transient.
• Watch out the ringing between CC and drive transformer at skip mode or UVLO, a diode is needed to damp the ringing.
DRV
CC RC
+VC - Dead time generator
Driver
C M C
M
C C
L C
L
R ≥ Q1 =2
DRV
C DV
V =
VDRV - VC - VC
RGS
CC to reset the driver transformer and RC to damp the L-Cresonance.
5 .
1 =0
>
C M
C C
L Q R
Single DRV Input with DC Restore
• VGS amplitude is independent on duty ratio at steady state.
• Limited sink capability. / DRV
CC1 RC
+ -VC Dead time generator Driver
C M
C C
R ≥ 2 L
DRV
C DV
V =
VDRV- Vf - Vf
RGS CC2
+
V-C-Vf
Single DRV Input with PNP Turn-Off
• A pnp transistor + diode help to improve the switching off.
DRV
Dead time generator Driver
Don’t Forget the AND Gate
• Add the totem-pole drivers if output capability of AND gate is limited.
• Is the design finished?
Î No, not yet. Pay attention to the ringing among CC1, CC2 and driver
transformer when skip or UVLO. A diode and resistor to damp the ringing. / DRV
Dead time generator High-side Driver
CC1 CC2
Dual Polarity Symmetrical DRV Inputs
• DRVA and DRVB are opposite-polarity and symmetrical Î no ac coupling capacitor.
• This is suitable for push-pull type circuit, e.g. LLC-HB, but NOT for asymmetrical type, e.g.
AHB or active clamp. /
• Pay attention to the flux of driver transformer at line/load transient.
• The strong turn off capability is still needed. /
• Pay attention to the delay caused by the leakage inductance. Î minimize the leakage inductance and use dual output windings instead of single output winding.
• Extra losses caused by voltage drop on Roff. / DRVB
Driver VDRV
- VDRV
DRVA
VDRV
- Vf
Roff
Roff
The Driver Transformer
• Pros
– A transformer is more robust than a die!
– Less sensitivity to spurious noise and high dV/dt pulses – Cheap?
• Cons
– Complicated circuits
– Pay attention on extreme line/line condition & off mode ……
– Pay attention on the leakage inductance and isolation – Is the sink capability strong enough?
Agenda
• Topologies using a half-bridge configuration
• The difference between soft and hard-switching
• The gate-drive transformer
• The all-silicon-solution
• Comparison
• Conclusions
IN Dead Time
Vcc
Gnd
in out
Vcc
Gnd
in out
M1
M2 VBoot
Vcc
Vbulk
DRV_HI
DRV_LO
GND GND_HI
Silicon Half Bridge Driver Principle
Integrated HB driver LLC converter
IN_HI
Vcc
Gnd
in out
Vcc
Gnd
in out
M1
M2 VBoot
Vcc
Vbulk
DRV_HI
DRV_LO
GND C1 GND_HI
IN_LO
• Principle
– Single or dual inputs – High & low side driver
Single Input
Dual Inputs
Integrated HB driver
Silicon Solution, What are its Limits?
• High-side isolation – 600 V is reached within the silicon.
• Matched propagation delay between high and low side drive – Prevents any unbalanced transformer usage.
• High side driver supply – Bootstrap supply is requested.
• Noise immunity – Negative voltage robustness of the high side driver.
Silicon Solution, High Voltage Isolation
IN_HI
Vcc
Gnd
in out
Vcc
Gnd
in out
M1
M2 VBoot
Vcc
Vbulk
DRV_HI
DRV_LO
GND GND_HI
S R Level Q
Shifter Pulse
Trigger
IN_LO
Floating area
• Pulse trigger: generates pulse on each edge from IN_HI input.
• Level shifter: shifts pulses from GND reference to GND_HI reference.
• SR flip flop: latches pulses information from the level shifter.
Level shifter sustains up to
600 V
IN_HI
Vcc
Gnd
in out
Vcc
Gnd
in out
M1
M2 VBoot
Vcc
Vbulk
DRV_HI
DRV_LO
GND GND_HI
S R Level Q
Shifter Pulse
Trigger
IN_LO Delay
Silicon Solution, Matched Propagation Delay
Delay compensation
• Delay is inserted on the fastest path: Low side driver path
Î to compensate: Pulse trigger + level shifter and SR flip-flop delays.
Vcc
Gnd
in out
Vcc
Gnd
in out
M1
M2
Vbulk
DRV_HI
DRV_LO
GND Bridge Vboot
Cboot Dboot
Rboot
Vcc
Vcc
Vcc
CVcc
Silicon Solution, High Side Driver Supply
• Bootstrap technique is used for supplying the high side driver
Bootstrap connected to Vcc
Bootstrap Step:
• Step 1: M2 is closed Î Cboot is grounded: Cboot is refueled via Vcc.
• Step 2: M1 & M2 are opened Î Bridge pin is floating, Dboot is
blocked & Cboot supplies floating area.
• Step 3: M1 is closed Î bridge pin moved to bulk level, Dboot is still blocked & Cboot supplies floating area.
Root of High Side Driver Negative Voltage?
• Let’s focus on the half-bridge branch:
– the load connected to a half-bridge branch is inductive:
– like an LLC-HB
– Or with the most simple case in a synchronous buck (where body diodes of the mosfet are represented).
LLC-HB
M1
M2
Vbulk
Dbody1
Dbody2
Vbulk
Theory: Buck Converter Operation
• 1st step of the buck converter:
Step 1:
M1 ON M2 OFF
VBridge Time
Time VBridge
Step: 1
VBulk M1 ON
M2 OFF
IL
IL
Vbulk
Theory: Buck Converter Operation
• 2nd step of the buck converter:
Step 2:
M1 OFF M2 OFF
VBridge Time
Time VBridge
Step: 1
VBulk
-Vf
2
M1 OFF
M2 OFF
IL
IL
Vbulk
Theory: Buck Converter Operation
• 3rd step of the buck converter:
Step 3:
M1 OFF M2 ON
VBridge Time
Time VBridge
Step: 1
VBulk
-Vf
2
M1 OFF
M2 ON
3
IL
IL
Vbulk
Theory: Buck Converter Operation
• 4th step of the buck converter:
Step 4:
M1 OFF M2 OFF
VBridge Time
Time VBridge
Step: 1
VBulk
-Vf
2
M1 OFF
M2 OFF
3 4 1
IL
IL
Bench: Buck Converter Operation
• Anywhere but in a ppt file there are parasitic elements:
– True buck converter:
M1
M2
Vbulk
Dbody1
Dbody2
Parasitic inductances
Parasitic Capacitors
Vbulk
Bench: Buck Converter Operation
• 1st step of the buck converter:
Step 1:
M1 ON M2 OFF
VBridge Time
Time VBridge
Step: 1
VBulk M1 ON
M2 OFF
IL
IL
Vbulk
Bench: Buck Converter Operation
• 2nd step of the buck converter:
Step 2:
M1 OFF M2 OFF
IL VBridge
IL
Time
Time VBridge
Step: 1
VBulk
-Vf
2
M1 OFF
M2 OFF
Time
1.453000ms 1.453200ms 1.453400ms 1.452846ms
V(BRIDGE) 0V
20.0V
-10.0V 31.8V
Bench: Buck Converter Operation
• 3rd step of the buck converter:
Step 3:
M1 OFF M2 ON
VBridge Time
Time VBridge
Step: 1
VBulk
-Vf
2
M1 OFF
M2 ON
3
IL
IL
Vbulk
Vbulk
Bench: Buck Converter Operation
• 4th step of the buck converter:
Step 4:
M1 OFF M2 OFF
VBridge Time
Time VBridge
Step: 1
VBulk
-Vf
2
M1 OFF
M2 OFF
3 4 1
IL
IL
Bench: Buck Converter Operation
• Negative voltage on bridge pin will create negative current injection inside the IC driver.
IN_HI
Vcc
Gnd
in out
M1
M2 VBoot
Vcc
Vbulk
DRV_HI
DRV_LO
GND Bridge
S R Level Q
Shifter Pulse
Trigger
IN_LO Delay
Vcc
Gnd
in out VBridge
Floating area
Leaky path when VBridge < 0V
This leakage path could create some trouble inside the driver IC.
How to Characterize the Negative Voltage?
Time VBridge
VBulk
-Vf
Time VBridge
Width
Principle:
¾ Negative pulse is added on bridge pin:
¾ With adjustable Negative voltage
¾ And adjustable Width
Vneg
At each pulse width the neg. voltage is increased until the driver IC fails.
How the Negative Voltage has Been Created?
L1
100uH IN_LO
IN_HI
C7 10uF 25V
C19 100nF
C3 220uF 50V
D13 D1N4148
Rload 10R
Pulse gen. 0
0
VCC
D14 D1N4148
TX1
BZX84C18 D5 BZX84C18 D6
C13 100n
Q4 FDP3682 Q5 FDP3682
Q6 FDP3682 VCC
Vout
BZX84C18 D7 R10
47k
0
C4 330uF 100V
C12 100nF
Rload1 10R VDC_IN
20V
D11 D1N4148 U1
NCP5106A VCC 1
IN_HI 2
IN_LO 3
GND 4
DRV_LO 5 BRIDGE 6 DRV_HI 7 VBOOT 8
0
0
R1 1R R2
10R Q1 Q2N2907
R3 10R Q2 Q2N2907
Vneg 0Vdc to 50V D4
MBR1100 R4
10R C11
100n
U5 MC33152
1 2
Sync
R8 47k
R9 47k
Synchronous Buck Converter
Negative pulse generation IC Driver
Adj. VNeg Adj. pulse
width
Example of Negative Voltage Measurement
VG_LO (10 V/div) VG_HI (10 V/div)
Vbridge pin (20 V/div)
Time
(80 ns/div) Width = 150 ns
Vneg = -18 V When the bridge pin is released, it generates some
noise on the hi- side driver.
Note: Negative voltage pulse is applied when the bridge pin voltage is reaching zero.
Negative Voltage versus Neg. pulse duration @ +25°C
-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Negative pulse duration (ns)
Negative pulse voltage (V)
Negative Voltage Characterization
If the negative pulse is inside this area, the driver will not work properly or can be damaged.
If the negative pulse is inside this area, the driver will work properly.
Negative Voltage Characterization in Temperature
Negative Voltage versus Neg. pulse duration @ different Temp
-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Negative pulse duration (ns)
Negative pulse voltage (V)
-40°C 25°C 125°C
• Note: These characterizations will be available in each IC driver datasheet
Driver IC Remarks
• ON Semiconductor defines electrical parameters on overall temperature range (here -40℃ < Tj < +125 ℃). See
electrical table & characterization curves.
• Competitors define the electrical parameters only at Tamb = +25℃. Temp characterization is not always available
Î what about min & max over extended temperature range?
• The competitors values extracted from the curves probably do not take into account the lot to lot process variations
Î the range variation is probably wider.
ON Semiconductor IC Driver Cross Reference
•3.3 V CMOS/TTL input
•Internal fixed dead time 650 ns
•One pin for creepage IR2111 –
IRS2111, NA
30 ns / 60 ns 750 ns /
100 ns 85 ns /
35 ns NCP5111
•3.3 V CMOS/TTL input
•Internal fixed dead time 520 ns IR2104 –
IRS2104 NA
10 ns /45 ns 620 ns /
100 ns 85 ns /
35 ns NCP5104
•3.3 V CMOS/TTL inputs
•Internal fixed dead time 100 ns IR2304 -
IRS2304, L6388/84 FAN7380 3
20 ns / 35 ns 100 ns /
100 ns 85 ns /
35 ns NCP5304
•3.3 V CMOS/TTL inputs
•Internal fixed dead time 100 ns IR2106 –
IRS2106, FAN7382 20 ns / 35 ns 3
100 ns / 100 ns 85 ns /
35 ns NCP5106B
•3.3 V CMOS/TTL inputs IR2106 –
IRS2106, FAN7382 -
20 ns / 35 ns 100 ns /
100 ns 85 ns /
35 ns NCP5106A
•3.3 V CMOS/TTL inputs IR2181 –
IRS2181 -
20 ns / 35 ns 100 ns /
100 ns 40 ns
/ 20 ns NCP5181
Remarks Pin-Out
Compati- bility Cross
Conduction Protection Matching
Delay Typ / Max Propag.
Delay typ.
tON/ tOFF Drive trise /
tfall typ.
(CL=1 nF)
Agenda
• Topologies using a half-bridge configuration
• The difference between soft and hard-switching
• The gate-drive transformer
• The all-silicon-solution
• Comparison
• Conclusions
3 26 L1
5 4
8 T1 XFMR
C1
C3a 1mF
7 C8 100p
R14 10k R15 15
D4 1N4148 17
28 M1 IRFB11N50A
24 M2 IRFB11N50A
40 16 U2 TL431
13 R6 10k
out
R7 86k
R8 10k C5
470p L3 4.7uH
C2 680uF
Part number = EEUFC1V681
int out
int
10 R1 22k
C4 10n
R2 22k
18 C6
470p R3
22k
C7 C10
+400 V
0 V R5
47k
R9 47k
45 11 2
30 12
42 14
41
19
23 1
2 3 4 5
8 6 7
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 29 16
37 38
39 6
1 31
NCP1395A
timer
BO
analog ground
C15 100n
C18 22u R16
R24 250k 75k
R11 160k C19 10u
R12150k C20 10u R195.2k 10n C14
C13 U5A
SFH615-A
C11 10n
R22 4.7k R25 1.8Meg
100n
540
R23 10k
U5B SFH615-A Vcc
InA
InB
Gnd
OutA
OutB VB
Gnd
C3b 1mF
C3c 1mF
Part number = EEUFC1V102 Irms=5 A
24 V / 10 A P = 4W
22nF
Part number = PHE450MB5220JR06 C1
0.47uF
Part number = PHE450MF6470JR06L2 C7
100uF
Part number = 2222-05737101 C10
Snap-in BC Comp. 450 V EVOX RIFA 630 V EVOX RIFA 630 V
D3 mbr1645
D6 mbr1645 D11 mbr1645 D12
mbr1645 Heatsink 18°C/W KL112-25
L1 PCV-0-274-04 220u
1 kV
PCV-0-472-20L
ETD44 ET4415A KL195/25,4SW
KL195/25,4SW R32
33k
R33 5.6k
FF
FF
20
21 25
22 T2 Q3903-A
D15 1n5818
D17 1n5818
. .
Vcc
D5 1n5818 D7 1n5818
R17 1k R18 1k
27 D10 1N4148
R20 10
32 R21 1k
33 R4 1k 34 D8 1N4148 R10
10
.
Vcc
C16 10u C17 0.1u
R30 47k
R29 47k
1
6 2 5 3 4 Q1
2N2222
Q5 2N2907
Q2 2N2222
Q6 2N2907
Q10 2N2907
Q11 2N2907
LLC-HB Schematic with Driver Transformer
• LLC-HB with 24 V @ 10 A
• NCP1395, the LLC controller with dual DRV outputs.
• Transformer drivers the MOSFETs of LLC converter.
Driver Transformer LLC controller
NCP1395
3 26 L1
5 4
8 T1 XFMR
C1
C3a 1mF
7 C8 100p
R14 10k R15 15
D4 1N4148 17
28 M1 IRFB11N50A
24 M2 IRFB11N50A
40 16 U2 TL431
13 R6 10k
out
R7 86k
R8 10k C5
470p L3 4.7uH
C2 680uF
Part number = EEUFC1V681
int out
int
10 R1 22k
C4 10n
R2 22k
18 C6
470p R3
22k
C7 C10
+400 V
0 V R5
47k
R9 47k
45 11 2
30 12
42 14
41 35
23 1
2 3 4 5
8 6 7
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 29 16
37 38
39 6
1 31
NCP1395A
timer
BO
analog ground
C15 100n
C18 22u R16
R24 250k 75k
R11 160k C19 10u
R12 150k C20 10u R19 5.2k 10n C14
C13 U5A
SFH615-A
C11 10n
R22 4.7k R25 1.8Meg
100n
540
R23 10k
U5B SFH615-A Vcc
InA
InB
Gnd
OutA
OutB VB
Gnd
C3b 1mF
C3c 1mF
Part number = EEUFC1V102 Irms=5 A
24 V / 10 A P = 4W
22nF
Part number = PHE450MB5220JR06 C1
0.47uF
Part number = PHE450MF6470JR06L2 C7
100uF
Part number = 2222-05737101 C10
Snap-in BC Comp. 450 V EVOX RIFA 630 V EVOX RIFA 630 V
D3 mbr1645
D6 mbr1645 D11 mbr1645 D12
mbr1645 Heatsink 18°C/W KL112-25
L1 PCV-0-274-04 220u
1 kV
PCV-0-472-20L
ETD44 ET4415A KL195/25,4SW
KL195/25,4SW R32
33k
R33 5.6k
FF
FF
1 2 3
4 5
8
6 7
51 44 36 U1 NCP5181
25 D1 1N4937
R13 10
C9 100nF
R26 10
R27 10 C12
100n
D2 1N4148
D9 1N4148 R28
47k
R31 47k
LLC-HB Schematic with Driver IC
• LLC-HB with 24 V @ 10 A
• NCP1395, the LLC controller with dual DRV outputs.
• NCP5181, driver IC drives the MOSFETs of LLC converter.
LLC controller NCP1395
Driver IC NCP5181
V
GSWaveform
• The waveforms seem similar.
Driver transformer Driver IC (NCP5181)
VGS_ML (5 V/div)
VGS_MU (5 V/div) IMU
(2 A/div)
VDS_ML (100 V/div)
2 µs / div
High Side MOSFET Turns Off
• The driver IC turns off the MOSFETs more vigorously.
• IC turn-off is 70 ns faster, lowering the switching losses
Turn-off comparison
80 ns / div
Driver transformer Driver IC (NCP5181)
VGS_ML (5 V/div)
VGS_MU (5 V/div) IMU
(2 A/div) VDS_ML (100 V/div)
High side MOSFET Turns On
• The driver IC keeps safe and enough dead time between high and low side MOSFETs.
200 ns / div
Turn-on comparison
Driver transformer Driver IC (NCP5181)
VGS_ML (5 V/div)
VGS_MU (5 V/div) IMU
(2 A/div) VDS_ML (100 V/div)
The Efficiency Comparison
• There is no efficiency difference between the IC driver and transformer solutions.
Input power
(W)
Output power
(W)
Vout (V)
Iout
(A) η
128.33 119.72 23.96 5.00 93.29%
257.2 235.46 23.57 9.99 91.55%
128.34 119.72 23.96 5.00 93.29%
258.5 236.46 23.67 9.99 91.48%
Driver Transformer
Driver IC
Agenda
• Topologies using a half-bridge configuration
• The difference between soft and hard-switching
• The gate-drive transformer
• The all-silicon-solution
• Comparison
• Conclusions
Conclusion: Transformer or IC?
• Both solutions work if well-trimmed.
• We recommend the IC solution because:
– We don’t sell the transformer.
– Manual insertion for the transformer.
– Ease the layout – Ease the design
– Free of transformer problems, e.g.:
• isolation is destroyed,
• flux walking away,
• unexpected ringing after turn off,
• Height of the transformer in low profile PSU
For More Information
• View the extensive portfolio of power management products from ON Semiconductor at www.onsemi.com
• View reference designs, design notes, and other material supporting the design of highly efficient power supplies at
www.onsemi.com/powersupplies