「ひらがな」認知に及ぼす「マス」の影響―文字完成の有効な情報としての「マス」の働きを検証する―
12
0
0
全文
(2) . The Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science 2011, Vol. 29, No. 2, 118῍129.
(3) ῌ
(4) ῌ . !. ". #$%&. The influence of the information in frames on the recognition of hiragana: A study of frames that assist completion of hiragana letters. Tomoko S6ID The University of Tokyo῎. This study examines the e#ects of frames on the recognition of Japanese hiragana characters when using a letter completion test (LCT). In this test only some of the strokes of a hiragana character were presented to the participants who were asked to complete the character. The LCTs, with and without frames, were administered to participants in adult and school-age groups. It was found that regardless of the age of the participants, higher letter-completion rates were obtained in the with-frame condition. These results indicated that frames have positive e#ects on completion of the task, and suggest generalized facilitative e#ects on hiragana recognition. In addition, further analyses indicated that frames can specify the relative position of the components of hiragana characters and the size of complete hiragana characters. Key words : letter recognition, e#ect of closure, hiragana, relative local position, feature-integration. opqorost uvwxWyz6{]. . :-|`) 0}~]() _`a . . () 0 ( e1-0. ' () *+,-./
(5) 0). :.O . ) yz6{]) .
(6) 123456 7ῌῌ89:;<. Z :-A : h.. ,-.=>
(7) ?@-A BC. oj}[(AO A .. DEF GHῌῌIJEF-. KLM). () ot. 2002NO 0PQR() STUVPQRWX. Wyz6{ KN A K o. YPQRZ[-A ) \0](=>?^
(8) . o ) 1964N)
(9) ]IJ. B
(10) ] _`a,-.UVbcdL. PQR A K ¡o! ) 2003N) "¢. efg7]h`) i (
(11) ] _`a,-.j. £W
(12) ,¤¥¦§¨5 K©. k1-.O ') lmn:]() (. #N A Kª¡) 2001N t«¬-) $(%®j¯° Ke.g. ±Mo²³´o. ῎ Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Information Studies, The University of Tokyo, 7῍3῍1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo. µo¶·o&¸) 2002N) ¹.º» '¼,-A O 0-(»½.j ) _`a 7 W\- 1 . Copyright 2011. The Japanese Psychonomic Society. All rights reserved..
(13) ¼¢½ 0C 1 gh 0)*1 78
(14) . 119. : t uvqwxy Sdz{. !"#.
(15) |
(16) D; J
(17) A"}eH#~. $%$ &'.
(18) $ ()*. "#jR ~w dz #"Ra:. +," -./ 0)*1 " 0)*1 2. A A (Bouma, 1970; Falkenberg, Rubin, & Bex,. .
(19) 345"#6789. 2007) I^H[D^ [sS N:)*. : ; $%$ ;2 <= 0)*1.
(20) D}| { NsZZ.
(21) >? 0)*1 . U#A k 1979; 2000l. -./( 2 $ @A#
(22) 0). Crowding h.R +D{h . *1 #A5B 0)*1 0C. n"# "
(23) Ns. 1 D E 0F
(24) 1 $ 5B"#. 5: t. A 2
(25).
(26) H[t2r. !6" #G.
(27) 4 dzsA ^ (Cattell, 1886) #G". D
(28) H#IJ *KLM 78 $%. crowding mn !:P AH¡ ?. N& (Hofstadter, 1995) 'OP". ' H~*' Hmn A. A 0)*1 2
(29) 5B(Q" . 5B o A. RS T
(30) 6)U * +V. van Leeuwen & Lachmann (2004) ¢K.. W,# X-D.T Y. "#do£:
(31) ; ?5"#T. Z . .6 v" h78". /0 5B1[ 0)*1
(32) 34. \ 78]23 . ῐ῏῎῍ " 4^ R_`'#G"#A A . 56"#78"#A9:. 3a:5bAcd 0)*1
(33) 5 Bef"
(34) 34gh78ei R
(35) D;<5Bj`A=> k?l 5"#AS6 mn @A#A Bo ? jR 3CDj[EP EFp G iq
(36) HI 1
(37) rjR #Aq
(38) J
(39) K#sA tuL"#IJ HS#AH ? 6R[ Mv N: OEFpPQ (Kovacs & Julesz, 1993; Kimchi, 1994) .RSwH EF p x& ,TN: 0[U"1 VS5:#A ei BW ? K.yz/3C{ Sw XP o6Y ZZ [s \]" H ^3K.yz/ _`|a .RSw b 3c}n " (Duncan, 1984) .R{ 5B ~ doe (Field, Hayes, & Hess, 1993; Kovacs &. ;
(40) 6A# ke.g. ¤ Al Dj ¥ ¦$; o4o mn5"# u§A Dj
(41) D; o" ? ~w ; mn o4
(42) mn v >¨ "#A Hq ©ª? 5B ©ª 6 "H[ K* S«#" top-down 78¬SPA ¤ A d ¤ ®.¯jR "#1 ¤¡ P ? dzPQ
(43) s°23 ~w °"±²A
(44) s!(³M ' H
(45) "#3 ^. ¬S .RSwH[Dj ;h.R! U P@A"#A (Lachmann & van Leeuwen, 2004, 2007; van Leeuwen & Lachmann, 2004) d u F
(46) 0C 1 N:"# #@[ ´Mµ¶z/a A ? . ; T ^ v#A (Jincho, Lachmann, & van Leeuwen, 2008). ῎῍ῌῒῑ. Julesz, 1993) Nf Mv M' g !. R;D
(47) N"#? 6mn·¸"#. q 3hi$p [3C{ Sw PQ.
(48) D;? 5B K* VAA. a: HS#@[ Ry KM/. 78 A9:
(49) ³M". jL kMetzger, 1953 kl 1968l 5mnP#o. # x&6 . # 6"# ? crowding q. q » I
(50) #A# ?j. pq )*a: " ?r N: N sG Z crowding a. 1. ¹[U" º. i. u 4 I L
(51) L 8 ¡
(52) ©ª("#A.
(53) ¼Ic/0. 120. 6 29 ½. 62¬. van Leeuwen & Lach-. 8 .%98% 5 (Jincho et al., 2008) 0. mann (2004)
(54) . L V 8 CD `a &'. . ` 2 * a, b&8c.d. . ! "
(55) #$% &'. Cec> ,wx9 /-]{fg)e? . ()*+, . * ! .! MN . -. Jincho et al. (2008) /0.,
(56). . -/0.,/-] ;<=>?@. #12 34567 8
(57) #,. A,98% &' . 986 : 1 3 ;<. hij)) `a k48lm. =>?@A7 345,7 B 6. ? ~* . . , 3 #A
(58) # ()Jq. 2 3C!3 DE,"#.,8. $ , FG. %!. 6,H
(59) #&.. `a ()e? n2 Jincho et al. (2008) .. A H*8fHo f. 'I()JK2 LMN O. . PQ RS., ;<=>?@A T%U. . V 8 D", qA. TpJ!qrh N b d +. V 8 . 6W* . 3. HYZ&8Q 3[ X9Ks . C!3 DE X8 *% Y5. tI78. y V 8 D. ) $ ,H+,8Z[. RS . 2DE. \. a2 h . 5. -../-] ;<=>?@A.. ) `a &'. 45 % $. u[. $ /0. 0. 1^. 1*_8$8. ;<=>?@A 27JQ^. /-] `a. &'3\ 2 ) 4$5 63, bS. `\h 3[ . <NNraA letter com-. pletion test W LCT2. 8¡b `a. C`a 8v¢.RS LCT 8,. P8%. b £¤. ¥£. 78. /-9c:d `a ;< . ¦? w. . 12H* `a ; 3[. _*bS, =8&'. _& Figure 13 `a x y. >7e? 6@ #A X. . z1 § 3[ . 9 >TZ[ KB&%C f X . . N^ . *{C|¨ 1980; |. Dg DE. ¨ 1981 H% Q . ENe? ;<. ~ ,}=. =>?@A,%U. 26 FG8h HI. */&,!©850 . &#A"#8JKCLPCiMCjM 27JQ^ . 8e? < 8" . N O k 3 Jincho et al. (2008)
(60). #KQ5C4$5% &8}c,~. 2H* 6%!. ,H
(61) #. 8 . ª« 1993 . H*8. l f. N 8 z* "8 . >7H* P m] 3. \nQ +KRo ,p. S" )RF. T7 (&8<qars. (% . 8H C. D" `a lm. w. 2 . MN % /0., cX. 6 U> %U V 8 tutv. ¬¦y &%C ,. . V 8 ,VW8jM+h wx9. *. X2y, HKM&8 tutv z*. Q.,8 RSZ[, Jincho et al.. \/-]{|+* D y b d, p q H*8O&8 }. 2. =788;<=>?@A3\ h 8 ~ YZ&8Q K , z ,83[ X9788 h \ 1973 * N H*z T63M RF] 2. W*H bSZ[ HI& ^_ 45 % ;<=>?@A3\ V . 3. _ L ¥>. % . ¥> 45. .T. | ¨ (1981) , / - ] x LCT 8 C 6 x M® ¯°, 8 x ¡b. 8" x 1973 ±ec².³ 681 ³ 678 ´ 1359 CµP . |¨x. , ¶*H · 7 2 _ ^ L z ¸ 3 _ ¹ º h 4 _ K » 2 . .
(62) ¼\½ '()%* X7O 'AB* gh. Figure 1.. 121. Hiragana LCT with (left) and without (right) Frames.. (2008)
(63) . ;4<) ./=|)m- ?}~.
(64) . B>y??@ ;wAd9&v9 B+. . ^z CD &Ev9=|. !"#$%& '(). %* +,- ./012 $
(65) 3! 4 56 "789&:. %i) @:.
(66) 3 '()%* F LCT IG+H. ;< =9&:>? +@9- 'AB*. 9 'AB* %F HFigure 1 0J + . @ C D 'A B* % 2 E LCT F G . 'AB* @CF LCT W 'AB* %F. H'!* I. LCT +& '()%* 6D ]&9 'AB*. J !"K!LMNG. !") D>? &9 (1) 'AB* '()%* 6D+#$O:P%%9&. OIR3+
(67) . ./012+ 2 !^ 'AB* @CD%. :#Q+RS (2) LCT 24 T!LM& . FddB+- J (1981) Kf. 'AB* #UQ V%: '(O:W. H>?=| 1973 1.J z)dW. '()%* X7O 'AB* Y)+Z[- *. ) ./$8oL+MNOL- >?$. + (1976) $ ,-!.\./) ! . +J (1981) KOP 10 ! .Q. ]^:_/0$>?`+?1a bcd:e29. 'W $ 24 TQ ()% @C5. &:- >?f+O:W U9 W. O d)$!) 1 R 2 R\cd9&5. Q6 U:gh+R3O:Wi). O- @% 1¡9¢SC ()% +Gc. %:-. £9¤c&* ¥¦- \§¨T$z-. . . . $ + 3 !©> Uª d©m$O E - >?$ V«2 ¬r®q+ & Wv¯) '()%*D'°r°*D. !;. 012$ 20 j) 36 j5 84. X± ;Y²³´µ lm6n7Y &9¶. 4@- Qk>?`5?1lm6n7@8. Z- $ ./· 'AB* @CD% LCT +. 1 4 o 3 4$ pqr)sm 8 40 4 o 40 4. [¦9#k)KC¸&¹Q &9¶Z l. tu 80 4+!"- >?$ >?` 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 1. m6n7Yº»-. v9 124 4@- Qk8w 3 4 ow 1 4$x yv9K:;my@z pqr)sm - f {?18w 12 4 ow 12 4 tu 120 4pqr+!"- >? 1 1$ '()%*. . . D>?+=| LCT + 'AB* P%9#P Y)9&:+R3O:z.
(68) ¶·¸¹º. 122. » 29 ¼. »2½.
(69) . 0$ab5+$cd + 8 ef$ . LCT . ! "#$.
(70) abgh5+@ LCT ij$k). %& '() *+, -.. lm )$ "# )$ $n*. /0,
(71). opqrst# =)uFA Fop. 123*45+ 67+8$$ .
(72) t#$ vmA "#wqrst#w
(73) t#. ! )$ 9:"#$ 4 "#. x24 y1LCT z{1|D +}~ $F*ab,. , ;' < = >. j$1 LCT "#
(74) t#. )$ ? /0;@+6$ ABC D. qrst#1FA
(75).
(76) "# 1E, F +F . klF F LCT 24 . "# ,;& <
(77) G HIJ 6$. i1
(78) klm. ABC AF+8$1 + 1 K , LM NOJ PQR ES TUVWXQYZ ) K , [\1] ^ LCT _`. ῎ῐ῍ῌῑ῏ -.1a A .
(79) "#$E Figure 2 1 15X
(80) 1
(81) , D
(82) $)Q1Q,"# ,F 8"#1FA
(83) f$ 2 fklm G$ (F(1, 76)x11.90, p.01) 1FAG,[@ (F(1, 76)x 3.77, p.10) [@ m ¡¢£¤¥U
(84) *¦ 67.5§ y40 ¨ 27 80§ y40 ¨ 32 , ) L-.l* $. Figure 2. Mean Number of Correct Answers for adults.. Figure 3. 4. A ,R`F$c*$#© %. Mean Number of Correct Answers for schoolchildren.. 12mA / ,:ª5+$5 < « +i Q$¬©+8$)® +, L¯1« °±² ³+´CQ $)µ©+8$, +.
(85) °±² + US-³< ´µ
(86) '()* +. !"#$%&. ,. (}~_e 1L. ,. /01_. e *. A>? 28.9 . >? 37.9_+D9 AE. Figure 3 -. /012 *3456789 :. 123. , ;-:<= >?@ A. , 2 *. -@+¡ 2 >?¢_e *9 )}~ }~ A £%.¤- ( . >? 2 *345.BC( 6789 /. t _AE. DE. ¥0H ¦2, 3 H1§¨a0H ¦4, 5, 6 H1§ gh. , F>?& G0H2 *345 0H. IJ&-K$L(MN :O PO.QR&. , e *-cL de. 2 ghijiklE. mn opn d. ST USVW HX-YOLIJ<MNZ[. s ¦ A© 345 1.93 ¦6789 1.85§. L, \]^_. `Q345 a(M. © 3.50 (3.31): F(1, 116)q13.77, pr.01§ D. N.b+O. Y¥0H¨a0Hiªopn dsE. , P2 *-cL def. ` 0Hgh. 3 ghijiklE. mn. opn (F(1, 100)q32.32, pr.01) 0Ho. ¦¥0. H© 3.63 (3.60) a0H© 2.11 (1.87): F(1, 116)q10.14, pr.01§, . uvwx Ut+O. (F(1, 116)q4.30,. pn (F(4, 100)q10.06, pr.01) .&-dsE. pr.05), «¬opn®mn ¥0H_ . f`opn.Ut+ODE. opn.dsE. ns), uvwx.b+ODE. (F(1, 100)q0.80,. (F(1, 116)q16.74, pr.01) a. 0H_ opn.Ut+O¡ (F(1, 116)q. ,. 1.34, ns) Z A>?_¥0H¨a0Ho. y2 -. 2 Yz{|ῌῌLCT &}~ .}~ DOL. | (&. DOLe ῌῌ b+O. , y2 . EL& D+}~Y(P _CDE e + \. | _.. +D- _ -ik. ,. pn.Ut+ODE. (F(1,116)q0.61, ns) . >?_¥0H¨a0Hopn.dsE (F(1,116)q13.83, pr.01),.
(87) . \]¨/01& >? | *345 BCDE. , P | *-c. L \]_ def`gh. Table 1 :<- \]_.y2 * e *. A>?_ 23.5t LCT }~ _. _ 60 ] 10 ] _. 7 ] ( _ . 6 ] e e **It , >?_. A>? 24.3_ _ 60 ] 13 ] ( _ 10 ] _ 8 ] e *It ?-BC9.DE. , F>. >?_ @. jiklE. 2 ghi. mn opn dsE. ¦ A© 3.10 (1.79) © 4.28 (1.78): F(1, 76)q8.70, pr.01§ f`_.ds9.Ut+ ODE. ¦f© 4.00 (1.77) `© 3.38 (1.94): F(1, 76)q. 2.46, ns§, /01_. A>?_.0H I -YO | * ¯EL. . >?_.0H9.Ab+ODE. (Figure. 4), P | *-cL de0H. Table 1 Rate of no answer With Frame. Without Frame. Adults. 23.5 (38/162) nq40. 24.3 (55/226) nq40. Schoolchildren. 28.9 (116/402) nq60. 37.9 (210/554) nq60. Note. Bracketed numbers indicate Numbers of No Answer/Numbers of Errors.. Figure 4. Mean Number of Slip Errors for schoolchildren..
(88) ¶·¸*¹º. 124. » 29 ¼. »2½. 2
(89) . xyA=>
(90). v S$o. (F(1, 110)6.44, p.05) . v%xy 29/ ^=>. . S$ vN3` mnBC "29&. !"#$% (F(4, 110)2.52,. p.10)& '()* +$%, -. / 0. ῏ s (a) =>
(91). vxy9. 1 2 16 . 22 . 34 2. -mn M (b) S$oxy9/ U. 18 . 26 .5 34601 6. c 2 (c) vxy9/. 25, -. "78 9&. a l ^M` ~ 1 . 01 LCT :;% - <=>
(92) ?@A. ) -mn& a 4 mn. 9 2BC5 3DE FG6. BC " -.&! e. H I JKL6M:;% -NOP. 6H xy 9;+9# 34
(93) . /QR & S BC5 -N. & LCT 34 {P%/5. OP T$ O"U '()*" -VW. 2 01
(94) 5BC "'¡ #¢3. XY Z%[\ :;%"]M ^15 _` +$%. P% -.&5£¤ (¥#. " 2BC5aHbcde+$%. 529&. ; & 345 BC5 fg 3P. wZ ῌ}0 ^1. -"2 h /iP% & VWXYZ. ; 2 ` 2
(95) . %[\ :;%'()* 81 _+$% . ^ 2¦ 43.25 (18.44) . 2BC ^8 _` j9; ]M -.. ¦ 36.92 (19.75): F(1, 44) 0.93, ns` / . kI ^ 5 20 _ l 5 12 _ 5. ^1 ¦ 41.92 (18.21), 2 ¦ 33.1 (22.10): F(1,. 12 _ M 5 10 _ 5 7 _ 5 7 _ . 44)1.68, ns` / #$% ; & § . 5 7 _`&. ῍ 2 . LCT
(96) LCT -mn 24 _o p$" / q0P% 9" -mn BC" r st 9uv"29& Qa5wZ r xy z9{z$%9 4 | & LCT -mn ῌ}0P~9 " 1 2 /5 ῍:Oz9j O "29/ ^ `6 ῎LCT -mn. ! ^/ - "# . 9;` "29/ ^ !N3`7 ῏p$". 5. 6. 7. 1 ¦ U + ~ Q # « O a ¬ d M 2 A 2 ¦ ; c l . & ¦ + ; c a M 2 ¦ U ~ Q # « O ¬ d l A & *mn ) LCT ® - ¯P° / -=> 1 ±F 6Q²"$" P% 9;³´ !& !N ^ ! 6 ²µV`¦ U + ~ Q # « O ¬ A !3 ; c a d M 2 l &.
(97) #$% ; (F(1, 44)1.32, ns) " " ^ ¦ 32.50 (20.43) ¦ 45.50 (16.53): F(1, 44) 5.86, p.05` % -mncH" "]M & w ῎. !N. 3 2
(98) #$% ; (F(1, 44) 1.64, ns) ". . ! " ^. . !N¦ 49.08 (14.52). !3¦ 31.08 (19.27): F(1, 44)13.26, p.01`. !. NO -mn" "]M & P$ ῏=>S$ vN3 2
(99) (F(1, 44)5.78, p.05) =>S$ vN3 " +$% ^ vN¦ 22.23 (12.86) v3¦ 55.19 (5.86): F(1,44)149.54, p.01` 25 w=>S $ v3 -mn5 "¨M & e 5/ ©ªq)#$% ; & ῏=>S$ vN3BC5 "+$%5 aBC5 -.&* '()* "xy 9; & * s ῏= >S$ vN3 2
(100) " ! ^ 2¦ 4.83 (6.58) ¦ 8.75 (8.72): F(1, 44).
(101) |}~ !. ,cY .
(102) . 125. Table 2 Comparison of correct rates between with and without Frame conditions Tasks with high similarity. Tasks with low similarity. I. Frame. Without Frame. Di#erence. II. Frame. Without Frame. Di#erence. 8 V 2 ; F : ^. 67 43 43 60 58 48 77. 33 18 22 42 42 35 68. 34 25 21 18 16 13 9. x y g. k z. 95 80 98 100 95 85 98. 75 63 83 88 83 77 90. 20 17 15 12 12 8 8. Others have few di#erences{ All figures are shown as percentage point of correct answers.. (N120). Table 3 Di#erence in correct rates between with and without Frame conditions. Lower Grade (N60). Upper Grade (N60). I. With. Without. Di#erence. With. Without. Di#erence. 8 V 2 ; F : ^. 50 29 25 58 42 42 67. 21 22 12 21 33 21 58. 29 7 13 37 9 21 9. 78 53 56 61 69 53 83. 42 17 28 56 47 44 75. 36 36 28 5 22 9 8. 92 83 96 100 96 71 96. 58 50 67 71 79 71 83. 34 33 29 29 17 0 13. 97 78 100 100 94 94 100. 86 72 94 100 86 81 94. 11 6 6 0 8 13 6. II x y g. k z. ITask with high similarity IITask with low similarity All figures are shown as percentage point of correct answers. 3.91, p.10
(103)
(104) 10.86 (9.38) 3.35 (4.04): F(1, 44). 7./0:G,HIJKD3 !B%4 &'L#3M: N/O
(105) P8&'D FQR#D S, 9.
(106)
(107) &'()#*+,-./0123 . !"QR#D 9. %4 $% 567./0,89
(108) *-:ῌ. 8&'GXQR:G, Y.
(109) ;<=:"% 2 <=>?>@;. E$F\]!84 ^
(110) _`Dab:Tcdef . AB%C . EFQR#N/OWB% g D !".
(111) D3 !B% . T. T. U. V. 2. E. 14.30, p.01 !"# $%. U. 3. V . 2 N/O
(112) W. %. Z. . [#. EF 11.92 (16.23) !" 14.33 (16.72):. QR#DN/OPh"%4 i . F(1, 44)0.72, ns
(113)
(114) . R#N/Ok2\lYM&'LGm,n8%4 op. EFj!"Q. 3 26.91 (14.93) 1.46 (2.50):. ,3 %! 567./D EFj!",q. F(1, 44)71.69, p.01
(115)
(116) &'. ]r$!_`Dds#EB% !"QR. ()#*+, 567012!B%4 -./0 56. #D 567./
(117) tu&'Lvw98%4 T
(118) &.
(119) »qrsG. 126. t 29 ¼. t2½.
(120) . mD23B" *+,]"^_"t. . B + #,E"F"$',
(121) .
(122) . . %^_< HG-H. %& ="8 . l "^_JK + "I"*J. ! " #$%& ῌ'(") *"
(123) + # ,- ./ 01234. B
(124) " n"(1C\ " 0S KLM. 3NO
(125) X( %
(126) . 3&. ,56 %& "'(". "# + *P. ) "7 (I)
(127) '(") *". Q23NO
(128) R %"Aq & c~S`B. 7 (II) 8" 0 9:% ;Table 2 <. T%4 ^VD + I23
(129) . =>& + ""?@43"8 I 7 ;. 4,U
(130) X( VW"W,r 'c. ) > A II 7 ;) *> "B#. %:X/"YQPQS%
(131) Z[S3& + #,. 334 #3& II 7B
(132) B
(133) + #. ."\- *GG \ 16.08 CG. , ."C D + . 18.11 *+ \ 19.95
(134) ]C3F. .E$ 3& " Table 2 "7F . =¡ 3 "W,r ':X/"YQP. G
(135) CG + #,- .". 2(^ ¢£"]_ &`5a
(136) "&U¤_.
(137) H"8 I % ;Table 3 <=>& D"JK. 4$=23
(138) . 43
(139) I 7 G CG
(140) B + #,-. `a¦b%:X"56c\3B"
(141) ¤. ./""8 . %A ". _"§: ¨:%4 a B¤_"©. " CG" + . 0. &U''&"5ada¦ 3 ;ªe-. L! ./"8$ 3& II 7 ". ef 1997>&. CG + #,- ./"8MN . 3& Duncan (1984) C¥. S &U¤_23
(142) 4$yy. 3& "# + ""?@G 0. «g 3
(143) Z[S3&U(^#3" . ($CG3
(144) O
(145) ?@P. Aq & + ."\-B *G. 3%Q.
(146) R3%Q 2 S%&. ῌ. G \ 12.92 CG 16.00 *+ 18.35
(147) =¡ I 3& ^_< H" ¬+ B. ῍. ¬+ !
(148) ®. 3¯23
(149) 5°3. T "&U-'&V + WX(. 4 h + ®±3
(150) 4$ ²³. 3Y( Z[23%\ *G)-*+,]
(151). + BD + "I¥´34 . %^_`$%& -a *+*G)
(152) B. $ 3& + 2µ`¶' T
(153) i. + "bWK c%*+.d" *G)G. ja¦23X(·$g, ²³ +
(154) T. "bWKIS%& + #, ."JK /. "kQy¸lmT3
(155) 4$ . e (1981) 0f
(156) gghi(1 2^_"34 I. H"#3¹"a¦ nr op23«g. 3
(157) jk03& /e0f'l "*+^_. 3" Aq & ^V¢£%rº . d "-m B
(158) " n"(1 C $%& .d"56"o7S"8I2B " B D"8F p30f 9:
(159) q & %A *G).d"bWK$0,
(160) r $%8 2^_"st uv;*S $% ;wG
(161) B.dw 6> Y( B#3
(162) xy3& LCT ""z $3
(163) *G)-*+
(164) B + #, . " 0S<$ % + .{F0 ~%>z %B?. =E|}. %& "*G). "@ A" B*S B -B? %& *" '2SC. Figure 5.. Hiragana surrounded by a Frame..
(165) ¼:½ o/ DE ²³g . 127.
(166) . < (I5*3& ,
(167) 6 (
(168). . !"#. 5g
(169) 7n Bm,. $ % & '()
(170) *+. o/ 2) / & 6B. LCT , -. . o/ , 58- *. "/+, -0/ 12*340 . , )
(171) 8-L ,9 I. ,5 & +2"# Figure 5a 67 80/9. " % & :i (1999) ?; 6. :;<= >07-4? $. 6. ( ¡% 48 ¢ 0/ o/ )
(172) 8-<. , @ A B3 & C . £I¤ , 2 )
(173) 8- 2I. D# E,FG0/?H. +/0 *+& <£ 6# + ¥ *. 7,IJ 25 KFigure 5b LMN& / . q 8-¦=§2*¨©/ & - OP. OPQ( R+67 *ST2. Q( =0B+, ª> 9?2? . U* ST V. , W 3. q+ *ST2? / =3. , YW Z[*. « & ¬0 + . !X"#2*V. & \]^_`P Y a $ K4 % b c. 58- =,? '( OPQ( . dN e& f'2 B 2g# X a2 Y a. @-R/+ 7 ? =& . h( i(I j kl ). ® ,? OPQ( q . 67 m,n o/ ,*I+/0 g. 2A3 58- 6 . p 4q $ I" p I . ®7¯3 (0/?58- ° s. r+* st70& 2 o/. 2"67&. ,RuDvIw-? g x $. ±
(174) , ST23 67. yzI. e& /{ . * q+ BC2 * 0IR . ,I| 2, ,RuDv } x. +< ῌ.32῍ o/ DE I²³gF. yz ~. st7&. Gn- ´27 2 &µ 46¶· . " $ 0 g I61. I1<3& q 0/ῌ.3 g. < +< ,@ 2 IR3& q . ¸H I¹- I" % . . ,@ 2 23 , )D+, 4. *STJ .3Iba ,. 53I" % /0E. 23Iºa2* ¶· »>IK.*+. Figure 6.. Trends in E#ect of Frame..
(175) ºr»Le|}. 128. Figure 6
(176) . _ 29 ¼. _2½. x.7dAy. ;! R0 &?@. Figure 6 2 . z)
(177) =w. . Ikeuchi, 1984; CDXEF 2006. ! "# $%$ &%' &(' &"' .
(178)
(179) )* + ,-./*01%. . 2 34 5 . ' ( Bj.
(180) {4Mp$./*K/|} %4;*$%@. b`.7 V-@ II l l 6mn / .
(181) ~,@*"GKH. IK\. 6 )7 &8' 9 :. < J "G%@7 &?@. . MK6* C (EFG H L M$. 3/7 7;! <= > . /. );* ῌ&?@. . &NO' ' AB6(5 C. (a) C (b) 5 +D (c) EFG H IJ /.7 K &NO' PQK & C ' PQ M$.
(182) & C ' PQ. L M$.
(183) R0OSTUL. 6) ,-./*. ' K. +,_-^).`MP^)K$.. a/$./*VK. ,-0. ;|})
(184) LCT NO$0 &NO' ;!X&NO' $P) QO$ &NO'. . X MP^)K$.a/$./*/ . ,. -0 ~L LCT R /.j/#,-0V$0S. V-@(5 C W Table. T9PQ
(185) V-R) 7),-./* Jincho. 2 &NO' ;!X$IJ) +. et al. (2008) U *S PQ M6*. /7. !Y./*
(186) &' <=
(187) (a) C K. QV6*7 K6*VK. )*#\. (c) EFG H " ,-* &/' &Z'. Y. V$0S PQ
(188) LCT R M7 ). &4' &!' &K' &V' [%!);* V-@ .
(189) 4 &?@.
(190) . ;*Kb`@-* 5 van Leeuwen & Lachmann. #4 Figure 6 8 V $%@O. STUL X. L %,
(191) &')*#\ V. ' WXR H $07 ). (2004)
(192) V$0S PQ
(193) T . #/K/(]"^)*01 &NO'. R)
(194) x,-/ $\X PQ. +,_-.`*^)K$.a/$./*Kb`@. $./* V +D
(195) TK &?@. - cEFG)70
(196) 6* &NO' ,. + *Kb`*VK. 12,-*. d`[. D! 3e3)7 &NO' $IJ. 0#$ &NO' PO. Y6*K) ' . Z);\. [ K/Y0W\7. )
(197) . #f$0K42,-* V- ,$. (b). % &NO' z%-0 &?@. 5 +D. 6* &W' &' &8' &;'. @£\,-0+,_-^) ] % ? ¤$ .
(198) &NO' ;!X$IJg) +. h,4 5. 5i + %Y0 &' 73e3)
(199) &NO' PQ j@-k Table 3 ) 6 I l K
(200) D. /.
(201) ~,@ H6*I. ' ¡¢%. ;\ ¡¢. PQ"G6*01 ^;¥_`¦¥K$.§\ $0@0W. V LCT &NO' ;!X$ IJ). Y0mn$./*# (b) l
(202) &N. r Q6* %"G6*VK
(203) ^;. O' PQ. ¥ ¦¥ D '@% 6*#)4 a@ _`. 4/ )
(204) 4 (a) ( (c) . K
(205) o$dY0Mp &NO' K7Y./* %7$ -/ Table 3 II l /.
(206) &NO' PQ 7 ,-.//01 VV ,-0 &NO' ;!X$ IJg + q8. ¦¥§\ 01 b¨©K*#\. ῏. ῎. ;cRK1* ;0! dªe ;De«f. ;*%r%
(207) s%1@-. W ¬ghifW
(208) ®¯qxj4rk. .// $%$ (i) #e3) %Y0 &N. l`/0#R$0 R0 °B± ²(e³X|. O' ;!X$9IJg +. 3e3)4t:$. }³ ´)m²¯©¦4#,Y0² n° µk. ./* (ii) #e3)
(209). %4j@- V-. $.4#,Y0² 7op !R$0 ¶m V. L. 3)uv$./* (iii) 7K7K. 3e. 34 Figure. 6 ;<@: #/ l);* (iv) &(' <=
(210) =w >-. ;* K/Y0H $. ;*. V-@=w >-0 &1' ( &i' ?
(211) @ 8. &!'
(212) . 3%Y0. ´·!$.y¸q$ ¹R6. ῌῑῐ῍ Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction E#ects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition. Nature, 226, 177ῌ178. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name.
(213) º4 »./1¼ (fg% »½¡¼ objects. Mind, 11, 63῍65. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective Attention and the Organization of Visual Information. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 113, 501῍517. Falkenberg, H. K., Rubin, G. S., & Bex, P. J. (2007). Acuity, crowding, reading and fixation stability. Vision Research, 47, 126῍135. Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F. (1993). Contour Integration by the Human Visual System: Evidence for a Local “Association Field.” Vision Research, 33, 173῍193. (1979)
(214) 33, 726῍731.
(215) (2000) !"#$% &'() * 84, 793῍798. +,- (1999) ./01234 56789. :; < () = 52, 516῍517. Hofstadter, D. R., & the Fluid Analogies Research Group (1995). Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies, New York: Basic Books. Ikeuchi, K. (1984). A Model of Character Recognition by Humans. Proceedings of ICPR 7th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 521῍524. Jincho, N., Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2008). Dissociating Congruence e#ects in letters versus shapes: Kanji and kana. Acta Psychologica, 129, 138῍146. > ? @ A!- (1980). BC MBDῌ"D#EF GHI $Jῌ KL%M& Kimchi, R. (1994). The role of wholistic/configural properties versus global properties in visual form perception. Perception, 23, 489῍504. NO'P (1993). (QR)S* TUVW X Y+ ,- VZ 3() .[ 6()7<\ ]^_ 5, 1῍26. Kovacs, I., & Julesz, B. (1993). A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: E#ect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90, 7495῍7497. `a/-@012 (1997) ($%345 () (2) 6bc- 7_ 30, 87῍90. Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2004). Negative congruence e#ects in letter and pseudo-letter recognition: the role of similarity and response con-. 129. flict. Cognitive Processing, 5, 239῍248. Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2007). Paradoxical Enhancement of letter Recognition in Developmental Dyslexia Developmental Neuropsychology, 31, 61῍77 van Leeuwen, C., & Lachmann, T. (2004). Negative and positive congruence e#ects in letters and shapes. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 908῍925. d8e (2001). 6 ;fg%9" !:. h;i<() 19, 83῍92. Metzger, W. (1953). Gesetze Des Sehens jklmn^ W. =Ao>j?p (1968). Q @A qBXCp A!- (1981). Learning disabilities Q56 j ;@Xrp EF
(216) LCT (letter completion test) B C D6
(217) 6s 20, 89῍95. tuv@wxyE@z{v@|+FG@HIJK (2002) (
(218) Q}~$LM4 ./1@W @N6 M- OP()O 101, 37῍42. AQ @R>@SJ (1964). T; $%() U6()O 24 U6() 0tV- (2002). ( (jWp ( X UM& p.808. Y@Z (2006) k 'UV! 0[\Xr ]^, j_ ¡¢ ITS _£< ¤_k¥¦f§¨`p M- OP ()O 105, 119῍124. © (1973). ª« X i< ¬ ©®¯@aQ°2 (2003). N6 ( b O £<ῌ6cde±g%¦²³¢ 0 / ´fῌ 0µ i<()@i<7_ 3, 31῍36. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A Standardized Set of 260 Pictures: Norms for Name Agreement, Image Agreement, Familiarity, and Visual Complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174῍215. 012 (1976). ¶ghi j ( 34i< · k ῌ2010.5.10 ¸¹ 2010.11.30 ¸<ῌ.
(219)
図
関連したドキュメント
Finally, we give an example to show how the generalized zeta function can be applied to graphs to distinguish non-isomorphic graphs with the same Ihara-Selberg zeta
An easy-to-use procedure is presented for improving the ε-constraint method for computing the efficient frontier of the portfolio selection problem endowed with additional cardinality
Let X be a smooth projective variety defined over an algebraically closed field k of positive characteristic.. By our assumption the image of f contains
By the algorithm in [1] for drawing framed link descriptions of branched covers of Seifert surfaces, a half circle should be drawn in each 1–handle, and then these eight half
Debreu’s Theorem ([1]) says that every n-component additive conjoint structure can be embedded into (( R ) n i=1 ,. In the introdution, the differences between the analytical and
It turns out that the symbol which is defined in a probabilistic way coincides with the analytic (in the sense of pseudo-differential operators) symbol for the class of Feller
Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A
We give a Dehn–Nielsen type theorem for the homology cobordism group of homol- ogy cylinders by considering its action on the acyclic closure, which was defined by Levine in [12]
