• 検索結果がありません。

A NOTE ABOUT THE SUMS OF PRODUCTS OF BERNOULLI NUMBERS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "A NOTE ABOUT THE SUMS OF PRODUCTS OF BERNOULLI NUMBERS"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Vol. 37, No. 2, 2007, 123-128

A NOTE ABOUT THE SUMS OF PRODUCTS OF BERNOULLI NUMBERS

Aleksandar Petojevi´c1

Abstract. This paper presents the formula to calculate the sums of products of the Bernoulli numbers in the form

X

1≤k1[n2]

1≤k2

·n−k1 2

¸

...

1≤km≤

·n−k1−···−km−1 2

¸

Ak1,k2,...,kmB2k1· · ·B2kmB2(n−k1−···−km),

whereAk1,k2,...,km is a certain sequence of rational numbers.

AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 11B68 Key words and phrases:Bernoulli numbers, sums of products

1. Introduction

The Bernoulli numbersBn are defined by the generating function:

t et1 =

X

n=0

Bn

tn

n! (|t|<2π).

Euler’s identity involves the sum of products of two Bernoulli numbers as follows

n−1X

k=1

µ2n 2k

B2kB2n−2k= −(2n+ 1)B2n (n2).

Eie [4] and Sitaramachandrarao and Davis [10] considered the sum of products of 3 and 4 Bernoulli numbers. Dilcher [3] proved form≥2

X

j1+···+jm=n j1,...,jm≥0

µ 2n 2j1, ...,2jm

B2j1· · ·B2jm =

=















(2n)!

(2n−m)!

[m−1P2 ]

k=0

b(m)k B2n−2k2n−2k 2n > m ,

(2n)!

4n +n−1P

k=0 (2n)!

2n−2kb(2n)k B2n−2k 2n=m , (−1)m−1(m2n1)!(2n)!b(m)n 0≤n≤£m−1

2

¤.

1University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Education, Podgoriˇcka 4, 25000 Sombor, Serbia, e-mail:

[email protected]

(2)

where

µ 2n 2j1, ...,2jm

:= (2n)!

(2j1)!· · ·(2jm)!

is the multinomial coefficient andb(m)k is the sequence of rational numbers de- fined by

b(1)0 := 1, b(m+1)k :=1

mb(m)k +1

4b(m−1)k−1 ,

with b(m)k = 0 for k <0 and fork >[(m1)/2]. Here [x] denotes the integer part ofx.

Finally, Petojevi´c [8] established the following sums of product of m N Bernoulli numbers

X

k1+···+km+1=n k1,...,km≥0

km+1≥1

µ n

k1, k2, ..., km+1

Bk1Bk2· · ·Bkm

B2km+1+k1

2km+1+k1 =





cn m= 1

Pn k=0

¡n

k

¢ak,m−1cn−k m >1, (1.1)

and form, n∈N0

X

k1+···+k2m+1=n k1,...,k2m≥0

k2m+1≥1

µ n

k1, k2, ..., k2m+1

Bk1Bk2· · ·Bkm+1

B2k2m+1+k1

2k2m+1+k1 =























1

3nBnB3n n > m= 0

Pn k=0

¡n

k

¢cn−k(−1)k¡m−1

k

¢−1

s(m−1, m−k−1) 0≤n < m

m−1P

k=0

¡n

k

¢cn−k(−1)k¡m−1

k

¢−1

s(m−1, m−k−1) +(−1)(m−1)!m+1 Pn

k=m

¡n

k

¢cn−kk!m−1P

r=0

s(m−1,r)

(k−m+r+1) (k−m)!Bk−m+r+1 n≥m >0 wheres(n, k) are Stirling numbers of the first kind andαn, cnandan,mare the

(3)

sequences defined by αn := (−1)n

µ2n1 n

−1

, n∈N.

cn :=









0 n= 0,

1

12 n= 1,

αn

4nB2n2n1B2n n≥2.

an,m :=























1 n= 0,

m¡n

m

¢m−1P

k=0

(−1)m−k−1s(m, m−k)Bn−kn−k n≥m∈N,

n!

(m−1)!

m−n−1P

k=0

(m−n−1)!

k!mm−n−k

×Pm

r=0

(−1)r−k+1s(m, r)(r)k m > n >0.

2. New sum of products

The relation (1.1) produces X

k1+k2=n k1≥0, k2≥1

µ n k1, k2

Bk1

B2k2+k1

2k2+k1 = ( 1

12, n= 1,

αn

4nB2n2n1B2n, n >1, or, it can be rewritten as

(2.2)

n−1X

k=0

µn k

BkB2n−k

2n−k =



1

12, n= 1,

α(n)

4n B2n2n1Bn2, n >1.

Let us specify new generalization of the relation (2.2). Before that, we will specify the notation: form∈Nandn >1, Qm(n) is defined by

Qm(n) = X

1≤k1[n2]

1≤k2[n−k21] ...

1≤km≤

·n−k1−···−km−1 2

¸

Ak1,k2,...,kmB2k1· · ·B2kmB2(n−k1−···−km)

where Ak1,k2,...,km is the sequence of rational numbers, defined as:

Ak1,k2,...,km=

· n 2k1, . . . ,2km

¸2−αn−k1−···−km

n−k1− · · · −kmf(n, k1, . . . , km).

(4)

Here· n 2k1, . . . ,2km

¸

=

¡n

2k1

¢

2−αn−k1

·

¡n−k

1

2k2

¢

2−αn−k1−k2

· · ·

¡n−k

1−···−km−1

2km

¢

2−αn−k1−···−km

,

f(n, k1, . . . , km) =

½ 1, 2km6=n−k1− · · · −km−1 or m= 1

1

2, 2km=n−k1− · · · −km−1andm6= 1 Next, form∈Nandn >1 the sumsPm(n) and ˜Pm(n) are defined by

Pm(n) = X

1≤k1[n2]

1≤k2[n−k21] ...

1≤km≤

·n−k1−···−km−1 2

¸

· n 2k1, . . . ,2km

¸2−αn−k1−···−km

n−k1− · · · −km

×

× B2k1· · ·B2kmB2(n−k1−···−km), and

P˜m(n) = X

1≤k1[n2]

1≤k2[n−k21] ...

1≤km≤

·n−k1−···−km−1 2

¸

· n 2k1, . . . ,2km

¸

B2k1· · ·B2km

Bn−k2 1−...−km n−k1− · · · −km.

Finally, we will define the sequencedk(n) (n2 ):

d1(n) = hn

2 i

, dk(n) =





n−k−1P

j=1

dj(n) 2



,

so that, clearly, ifdk(n) = 1 anddk+1(n) = 0 then maxm=k.Hence 1≤m <1 + log2n .

After the appropriate substitutionB2(n−k1), . . . , B2(n−k1−k2−···−km−1)in for- mula (2.2) we get

Pm(n) = αn

n(−2)mB2n+ 1

n(−2)m−1Bn2+

m−1X

s=1

(−2)s+1−mP˜s(n), or recursively

P1(n) = 2−αn

2n B2n+ 1 nBn2, Pm(n) = 1

2Pm−1(n) + ˜Pm−1(n).

(5)

For 2km6=n−k1− · · · −km−1>1,the equationBn−k1−···−km−1 = 0 produces Pm(n)−P˜m−1(n) =

= X

1≤k1[n2]

1≤k2[n−k21] ...

1≤km≤

·n−k1−···−km−1 2

¸ 2km6=n−k1−···−km−1

· n 2k1, . . . ,2km

¸2−αn−k1−···−km

n−k1− · · · −km

×

× B2k1· · ·B2kmB2(n−k1−···−km)

+ X

1≤k1[n2]

1≤k2[n−k21] ...

1≤km≤

·n−k1−···−km−1 2

¸ 2km=n−k1−···−km−1

· n 2k1, . . . ,2km

¸2−αkm

2km ×

× B2k1· · ·B2km−1B2k2m

= Qm(n).

That is how the following statement is proved.

Theorem 2.1. Forn≥2 and1≤m <1 + log2n we have:

Q1(n) = 1

nBn2+αn2 2n B2n, Qm(n) = 1

2Pm−1(n)

= 2−αn

n(−2)mB2n+ 1

n(−2)m−1B2n+

m−2X

s=1

(−2)s+1−mP˜s(n).

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Science of the Republic of Serbia under Grant No. 149011D.

References

[1] Abramowitz, M., Stegun,I. A., Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Washing- ton: National Bureau of Standards 1970.

(6)

[2] Carlitz, L., Bernoulli Numbers. Fib. Quart. 6 (1968), 71–85.

[3] Dilcher, K., Sums of Products of Bernoulli Numbers. J. Number Theory 60 (1996), 23–41.

[4] Eie, M., A note on Bernoulli numbers and Shintani generalized Bernoulli poly- nomials . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348 No. 3 (1996), 1117–1136.

[5] Lehmer, D. H., Recurrences for the Bernoulli numbers. Ann. Math. 36 (1935), 637–649.

[6] Miki, H., A relation between Bernoulli numbers, J. Number Theory 10 (1978), 297–302.

[7] N¨orlund, N. E., M´emorie sur les polynomes de Bernoulli. Acta Math. 43 (1922), 121–196.

[8] Petojevi´c, A., New Sums of Products of Bernoulli numbers. Integral Transform.

Spec. Funct. (accepted)

[9] Prudnikov, A. P., Brychkov, Yu. A., Marichev, O. I., Integrals and Series. Ele- mentary Functions. Moscow: Nauka 1981. (in Russian)

[10] Sitaramachandrarao, R., Davis, B., Some identities involving the Riemann zeta function. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 17 No. 10 (1986), 1175–1186.

[11] Vandiver, H. S., An arithmetical theory of the Bernoulli numbers. Trans. Amer.

Math. Soc. 51 (1942), 502–531.

Received by the editors May 3, 2007

参照

関連したドキュメント

of reflection-type (see Theorem 6.2), which can be regarded as a double analogue of the functional equation of the Riemann zeta-function $\zeta(s)$..

Zagier, Eisenstein series anti the Riemann zeta-function (in Automor-. phic forms, Representation theory and Arithmetic:

numerical computations, Fr¨oberg [2, p.210] said that it is perfect clear that the function is not differentiable.. Titchmarsh, The Theory of the Riemann Zeta

Keating and Neil O’Connell, Random matrix theory and the derivative of the Riemann zeta function, Proc.. Ingham, On two conjectures in the theory of

Harmonic numbers, Binomial coefficients and Gamma function, PolyGamma function, Combinatorial series identities and summation formulas, Partial fraction approach1. 2013 Universiteti

In this paper, we give q-Bernoulli numbers which can be viewed as interpolation of the above q-analogue of Riemann zeta function at negative integers in the same way that Riemann

As corollaries, we reproduce Dilcher’s formulas for sums of products of Bernoulli numbers and polynomials, and produce fromulas for special values of the zeta function η ( s ) which