Advances in Difference Equations Volume 2008, Article ID 743295,10pages doi:10.1155/2008/743295
Research Article
q -Bernoulli Numbers Associated with q -Stirling Numbers
Taekyun Kim
Division of General Education-Mathematics, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 139704, South Korea
Correspondence should be addressed to Taekyun Kim,[email protected] Received 13 December 2007; Accepted 29 January 2008
Recommended by Panayiotis D. Siafarikas
We consider Carlitz q-Bernoulli numbers and q-Stirling numbers of the first and the sec- ond kinds. From the properties of q-Stirling numbers, we derive many interesting formu- las associated with Carlitz q-Bernoulli numbers. Finally, we will prove βn,q n
m0n
km1/
1−qnm−k
d0···dkn−kqki0idis1,qk, m−1n−mm1/m1q,whereβn,qare called Carlitzq- Bernoulli numbers.
Copyrightq2008 Taekyun Kim. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Letpbe a fixed prime number. Throughout this paper, Zp,Qp,C, andCp will, respectively, denote the ring ofp-adic rational integers, the field ofp-adic rational numbers, the complex number field, and the completion of algebraic closure ofQp. Forda fixed positive integer with p, d 1, let
XXdlim
←−
N
Z
dpNZ, X1Zp,
X∗
0<a<dp a,p1
adpZp,
adpNZp
x∈X|x≡a
moddpN ,
1.1
where a ∈ Z lies in 0 ≤ a < dpN, see 1–21. The p-adic absolute value in Cp is normal- ized so that|p|p 1/p. When one talks aboutq-extension,q is variously considered as an indeterminate, a complex number q ∈ C, or ap-adic number q ∈ Cp. If q ∈ Cp, then we
assume |q −1|p < p−1/p−1, so that qx expxlogq for |x|p ≤ 1. We use the notation xq x : q 1−qx/1−q. Forf ∈ C1Zp {f | f ∈ CZp}, let us start with the expressions
1 pN
q
0≤j<pN
qjfj
0≤j<pN
fjμq
jpNZp
1.2
see6,8, representingq-analogue of Riemann sums forf. Thep-adicq-integral of a function f∈C1Zpis defined by
X
fxdμqx
Zp
fxdμqx lim
N→∞
1 pN
q pN−1
x0
fxqx 1.3
see8,22,23. Forf∈C1Zp, it is easy to see that
Zp
fxdμqx p
≤pf1 1.4
see6–14, wheref1 sup{|f0|p,supx/y|fx−fy/x−y|p}.Iffn→finC1Zp, namely,fn−f1→0, then
Zp
fnxdμqx−→
Zp
fxdμqx 1.5
see6–10. Theq-analogue of binomial coefficient was known as xn
q xqx−1q· · ·x
−n1q/nq!,wherenq!n
i1iqsee1,5,6,10,11. From this definition, we derive x1
n
q
x
n−1
q
qn x
n
q
qx−n x
n−1
q
x
n
q
1.6
cf.6,10. Thus, we have
Zp
x n
qdμqx −1n/n1qqn1−
n1
2
.Iffx
k≥0ak,q x k
q
is theq-analogue of Mahler series of strictly differentiable functionf, then we see that
Zp
fxdμqx
k≥0
ak,q −1k k1qqk1−
k1
2
. 1.7
Carlitzq-Bernoulli numbersβk,qβkqcan be determined inductively by β0,q1, qqβ1k−βk,q
⎧⎨
⎩
1 ifk1,
0 ifk >1, 1.8
with the usual convention of replacingβi by βi,q see 2–4. In this paper, we study theq- Stirling numbers of the first and the second kinds. From theseq-Stirling numbers, we derive some interesting q-Stirling numbers identities associated with Carlitz q-Bernoulli numbers.
Finally, we will prove the following formula:
βn,qn
mq
n km
1 1−qnm−k
d0···dkn−k
qki0idis1,qk, m−1n−m m1
m1q, 1.9 wheres1,qk, mis theq-Stirling number of the first kind.
2.q-Stirling numbers and Carlitzq-Bernoulli numbers
Form∈Z, we note that
βm,q
Zp
xmqdμqx
X
xmqdμqx. 2.1
From this formula, we derive
β0,q1, qqβ1k−βk,q
⎧⎨
⎩
1 ifk1,
0 ifk >1, 2.2
with the usual convention of replacingβibyβi,q. By the simple calculation ofp-adicq-integral onZp, we see that
βn,q 1 1−qn
n i0
n i
−1i i1
i1q, 2.3 wheren
i
n!/i!n−i!nn−1· · ·n−i1/i!. LetFtbe the generating function of Carlitz q-Bernoulli numbers. Then we have
Ft ∞
n0
βn,qtn n!
lim
ρ→∞
1 pρ
q pρ−1
x0
qxexqt ∞
n0
1 1−qn
∞
k0
n k
k1 k1q−1k
tn n!
et/1−q ∞ k0
−1k 1−qk
k1 k1q
tk k!.
2.4
From2.4we note that Ft et/1−qet/1−q
∞ k1
−1k 1−qk−1
k 1−qk1
tk
k!et/1−q ∞ k1
−1k 1−qk−1
1 1−qk1
tk k!
−t∞
n0
q2nenqt 1−q∞
n0
qnenqt.
2.5
Therefore, we obtain the following.
Lemma 2.1. LetFt ∞
n0
Zpxnqdμqxtn/n!. Then one has Ft −t∞
n0q2nenqt 1−q∞
n0qnenqt. 2.6
Theq-Bernoulli polynomials in the variablexinCpwith|x|p≤1 are defined by βn,qx
Zp
xtnqdμqt
X
xtnqdμqx. 2.7 Thus we have
Zp
xtnqdμqx n
k0
n k
xn−kq qkx
Zp
tkqdμqt
n
k0
n k
xn−kq qkxβk,q
qxβ xqn
.
2.8
From2.7we derive
Zp
xtnqdμqx βn,qx 1 1−qn
n k0
n k
−1kqkx k1
k1q. 2.9 LetFt, xbe the generating function ofq-Bernoulli polynomials. By2.9we see that
Ft, x ∞
n0
βn,qxtn n!
et/1−q ∞ k0
1
1−qkqkx−1k k1 k1q
tk k!.
2.10
From2.10we note that
Ft, x −t∞
n0
q2nxenxqt 1−q∞
n0
qnenxqt. 2.11
By2.7and2.11we easily see that mk−1q m−1
i0
qiβk,qm
xi m
βk,qx, m∈N, k∈Z. 2.12 If we takex0 in2.12, then we have
nqβn,qm
k0
m k
βk,qnnkqn−1
j0
qjk1jn−kq . 2.13
Let us define newq-Bernoulli polynomials,β∗n,qx, as follows:
F∗t, x Ft, x−1−q∞
n0
qnenxqt −t∞
n0
q2nxenxqt ∞
n0
βn,q∗ x n! tn.
2.14
In the special casex0, we can also derive the definition ofq-Bernoulli numbers as follows:
F∗t F∗t,0 ∞
n0β∗n,qtn
n!. 2.15
From these generating functions, we note that
−∞
l0
q2lnenlqt∞
l0
q2lelqt∞
m1
m
n−1 l0
q2llm−1q tm−1
m! . 2.16
Note that−∞
l0q2lnenlqt∞
l0q2lelqt 1/tF∗t, n−F∗t.Thus, we have ∞
m0
βm,q∗ n−β∗m,qtm m!∞
m0
m
n−1
l0
q2llm−1q tm
m!. 2.17
By comparing the coefficients on both sides in2.17, we see that
β∗m,qn−β∗m,qm n−1
l0
q2llm−1q . 2.18
Therefore, we obtain the following.
Proposition 2.2. Form, n∈N, one has q−1n−1
l0
qllmq n−1
l0
qllm−1q 1 m
β∗m,qn−βm,q∗
. 2.19
Now we consider theq-analogue of Jordan factor as follows:
xk,q xqx−1q· · ·x−k1q
1−qx
1−qx−1
· · ·
1−qx−k1
1−qk . 2.20 Theq-binomial coefficient is defined by
n k
q
nq! kq!n−kq!
1−qn
1−qn−1
· · ·
1−qn−k1 1−q
1−q2
· · ·
1−qk , 2.21
wherenq! nqn−1q· · ·2q1q.Theq-binomial formulas are known as n
i1
abqi−1 n
k0
n k
q
qk2an−kbk,
n i1
1−bqi−1−1
∞
k0
nk−1 k
q
bk.
2.22
Theq-Stirling numbers of the first kinds1,qn, kand the second kinds2,qn, kare defined as xn,qq−
n
2
n
l0
s1,qn, lxlq, n0,1,2, . . . , 2.23 xnq n
k0
q k
2
s2,qn, kxk,q, n0,1,2, . . . 2.24 see2,3,6. The valuess1,qn,1, n 1,2,3, . . . ,ands2,qn,2, n2,3, . . . ,may be deduced from the following recurrence relation:
s1,qn, k s1,qn−1, k−1−n−1qs1,qn−1, k 2.25 see2,3,6, fork1,2, . . . , n,n1,2, . . . ,with initial conditionss1,q0,0 1,s1,qn, k 0 if k > n. Fork1, it follows that
s1,qn,1 −n−1qs1,qn−1,1, n2,3, . . . , 2.26 and since s1,q1,1 1, we haves1,qn,1 −1n−1n−1q!, n 1,2,3, . . .. The recurrence relation fork2 reduces tos1,qn,2 n−1qs1,qn−1,2 −1n−2n−2q!, n 3,4, . . .. By simple calculation, we easily see that
−1n1s1,qn1,2
nq! −−1ns1,qn,2
n−1q! −1n1s1,qn1,2−nqs1,qn,2 nq!
−1n1−1n1n−1q! nq! 1
nq, n2,3,4, . . . .
2.27
Thus we have
−1ns1,qn,2 n−1q! n−1
k1
1
kq. 2.28 This is equivalent tos1,qn,2 −1nn−1q!n−1
k11/kq.It is easy to see that n
m1
−1m1q
m1
2
n1 m1
q
m k1
1 kq n
k1
−1k1q
k1 2
n k
q
kq. 2.29 From this, we derive
n k1
−1k1q
k1
2 1
kq
⎛
⎝ n
k
q
− n−1
k
q
⎞
⎠n
k1
−1k1q
k1
2 1
kq
⎛
⎝qn−k n−1
k−1
q
⎞
⎠ qn
nq n k1
−1k1q
k 2
n k
q
qn nq.
2.30
Note thatn
k1−1k1q k
2
n k
q−n
k0−1kq k
2
n k
q11.Thus, we have n
k1
−1k1q
k1 2
n k
q
kq n−1
k1
−1k1q
k1 2
n−1 k
q
kq qn
nq. 2.31 Continuing this process, we see that
n k1
−1k1q
k1 2
n k
q
kq n
k1
qk
kq. 2.32 Thep-adicq-gamma function is defined asΓp,qn −1n
1≤j<n,j,p1jq.For allx∈Zp, we haveΓp,qx1 Ep,qxΓp,qx, where
Ep,qx
⎧⎨
⎩
−xq if|x|p1,
−1 if|x|p<1. 2.33
Thus, we easily see that
logΓp,qx1 logEp,qx logΓp,qx. 2.34 From the differentiation on both sides in2.34, we derive
Γp,qx1
Γp,qx1 Γp,qx
Γp,qxEp,q x
Ep,qx. 2.35
Continuing this process, we have Γp,qx Γp,qx
x−1
j1
qj jq
logq
q−1Γp,q1
Γp,q1. 2.36 The classical Euler constant is known asγ Γ1/Γ1. In15, Kim defined thep-adicq-Euler constant as
γp,q−Γp,q1
Γp,q1. 2.37 Therefore, we obtain the following.
Theorem 2.3. Forx∈Zp, one has
x−1 k1
−1k1q
k1 2
x−1 k
q
kq q−1 logq
Γp,qx Γp,qx−γp,q
. 2.38
From2.9,2.21,2.23, and2.24, we derive the following theorem.
Theorem 2.4. Forn, k∈Z, one has βn,q 1
1−qn n l0
n l
−1ll
k0
q−1k l
k
q
k m0
s1,qk, mβm,q, 2.39
wheres1,qk, mis theq-Stirling number of the first kind.
By simple calculation, we easily see that qnt
tqq−1 1n
n
m0
n m
−1m1−qmtmq
n
k0
q−1kq
k 2
n k
q
tk,q
n
k0
q−1k n
k
q
k m0
s1,qk, mtmq
n
m0
n
km
q−1k n
k
q
s1,qk, m
tmq.
2.40
Thus we note
Zp
qntdμqt n
m0
n
km
q−1k n
k
q
s1,qk, m
βm,q. 2.41
From the definition ofp-adicq-integral onZp, we also derive
Zp
qntdμqt n
m0
n m
q−1mβm,q. 2.42 By comparing the coefficients on both sides of2.41and2.42, we see that
n m
q−1m n
km
q−1k n
k
q
s1,qk, m. 2.43
Therefore, we obtain the following.
Theorem 2.5. Forn∈N, m∈Z, one has n
m
n
km
q−1−mk n
k
q
s1,qk, m. 2.44
FromTheorem 2.5, we can also derive the following interesting formula forq-Bernoulli numbers.
Theorem 2.6. Forn∈Z, one has βn,q 1
1−qn n m0
n
km
q−1−mk n
k
q
s1,qk, m
−1m m1
m1q. 2.45 From the definition ofq-binomial coefficient, we easily derive
x1 n
q
x
n−1
q
qn x
n
q
qx−n x
n−1
q
x
n
q
.
2.46
By2.46, we see that
Zp
x n
q
dμqx −1n n1qqn1−
n1 2
. 2.47
From the definition ofq-Stirling number of the first kind, we also note that
Zp
xn,qdμqx nq!
Zp
x n
q
dμqx
q−
n 2n
k0
s1,qn, kβk,q.
2.48
By using2.47and2.48, we see
−1n qnq! n1q n
k0
s1,qn, kβk,q. 2.49 From2.24and2.48, we derive
βn,qq n k0
s2,qn, k−1k kq!
k1q. 2.50 Therefore, we obtain the following.
Theorem 2.7. Forn∈Z, one has βn,qq
n k0
s2,qn, k−1k kq!
k1q, 2.51 wheres2,qn, kis theq-Stirling number of the second kind.
It is easy to see that
n k
q
d0···dkn−k
qki0idi. 2.52
ByTheorem 2.4, we have the following.
Theorem 2.8. Forn∈Z, one has βn,qn
m0
n km
1 1−qnm−k
d0···dkn−k
qki0idis1,qk, m−1n−m m1
m1q, 2.53 wheres1,qk, mis theq-Stirling number of the first kind.
Acknowledgment
This paper was supported by the research fund of Kangwoon University.
References
1 C. Adiga and N. Anitha, “On some continued fractions of Ramanujan,” Advanced Studies in Contempo- rary Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 155–162, 2006.
2 M. Cenkci, Y. Simsek, and V. Kurt, “Further remarks on multiplep-adicq-L-function of two variables,”
Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 49–68, 2007.
3 M. Cenkci and M. Can, “Some results onq-analogue of the Lerch zeta function,” Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 213–223, 2006.
4 L. Carlitz, “q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials,” Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 987–
1000, 1948.
5 L. Carlitz, “q-Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 332–350, 1954.
6 A. S. Hegazi and M. Mansour, “A note onq-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials,” Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2006.
7 T. Kim and C. Adiga, “On theq-analogue of gamma functions and related inequalities,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 6, no. 4, article 118, p. 4, 2005.
8 T. Kim, “q-Volkenborn integration,” Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 288–299, 2002.
9 T. Kim, “On the analogs of Euler numbers and polynomials associated withp-adicq-integral onZpat q−1,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 331, no. 2, pp. 779–792, 2007.
10 T. Kim, “On aq-analogue of thep-adic log gamma functions and related integrals,” Journal of Number Theory, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 320–329, 1999.
11 T. Kim, “Onp-adicq-L-functions and sums of powers,” Discrete Mathematics, vol. 252, no. 1–3, pp.
179–187, 2002.
12 T. Kim, S. D. Kim, and D.-W. Park, “On uniform differentiability andq-Mahler expansions,” Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2001.
13 T. Kim, “A note on theq-multiple zeta function,” Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111–113, 2004.
14 T. Kim, “Sums of powers of consecutiveq-integers,” Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 2004.
15 T. Kim, “A note onp-adic invariant integral in the rings ofp-adic integers,” Advanced Studies in Con- temporary Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 95–99, 2006.
16 T. Kim, “A note on some formulae for theq-Euler numbers and polynomials,” Proceedings of the Jang- jeon Mathematical Society, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 227–232, 2006.
17 N. Koblitz, “q-extension of thep-adic gamma function,” Transactions of the American Mathematical So- ciety, vol. 260, no. 2, pp. 449–457, 1980.
18 H. Ozden, Y. Simsek, S.-H. Rim, and I. N. Cangul, “A note onp-adic q-Euler measure,” Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 233–239, 2007.
19 M. Schork, “Ward’s “calculus of sequences”,q-calculus and the limitq→ −1,” Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 131–141, 2006.
20 Y. Simsek, “Onp-adic twistedq−L-functions related to generalized twisted Bernoulli numbers,” Rus- sian Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 340–348, 2006.
21 Y. Simsek, “Generalized Dedekind sums associated with the Abel sum and the Eisenstein and Lambert series,” Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 125–137, 2004.
22 Y. Simsek, “Twistedh, q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials related to twistedh, q-zeta function andL-function,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 324, no. 2, pp. 790–804, 2006.
23 H. M. Srivastava, T. Kim, and Y. Simsek, “q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials associated with mul- tipleq-zeta functions and basicL-series,” Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp.
241–268, 2005.