• 検索結果がありません。

Finite Commutative Hypergroups Associated with Actions of Finite Abelian Groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Finite Commutative Hypergroups Associated with Actions of Finite Abelian Groups"

Copied!
9
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

奈良教育大学学術リポジトリNEAR

Finite Commutative Hypergroups Associated with Actions of Finite Abelian Groups

著者 HEYER Herbert, JIMBO Toshiya, KAWAKAMI Satoshi, KAWASAKI Ken‑ichiroh

journal or

publication title

奈良教育大学紀要. 自然科学

volume 54

number 2

page range 23‑29

year 2005‑10‑31

URL http://hdl.handle.net/10105/115

(2)

1  Introduction

For a finite group L, one defines canonically two commutative finite hypergroups K(L)and K(Lˆ ), called the class hypergroup and the character hypergroup of L respectively. The character hypergroup K(Lˆ )is obtained by the fusion rule on representations of G. In the previous paper [K-I], where L is given as a semidirect product group N αGunder an action αof a finite abelian group G on a finite abelian group N, we constructed directly the character hypergroup K(N αG)in the -algebra A(Nˆ ) A(Gˆ )with the help of an action αˆ of Gon Nˆ.

For an action αof a finite abelian group Gon a finite commutative hypergroup H, in the previous paper [K-I], we defined the finite commutative hypergroup K(H,G,α) as the dual of K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ ). In the present paper we are going to construct the hypergroup K(H,G,α)associated with the action αof Gon Hand to show that K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ )is isomorphic to the dual of K(H,G,α)as hypergroups. The construction of K(H,G,α)related to the action αof Gon H=(H, A(H)), where A(H)is the associated -algebra over of the hypergroup H, runs as follows. Let E be the canonical conditional expectation from the crossed prod- uct A(H) αGonto the center Z(A(H) αG)of A(H) αG.

Then K(H, G, α)is defined as the image of the canonical base {hjλg; hjHand gG} of A(H) αGunder E, under the assumption that αis regular. Here, λ denotes the canonical representation of Gimplementing the action α, namely, αg=Adλg.

This work was completed when the first named author visited the Department of Mathematics at Nara University of Education in the spring 2004.

2  Preliminaries

We recall some notions and facts about finite com- mutative signed hypergroup according to Wildberger’s paper [W]. K= (K, A)is called a finite commutative signed hypergroups if the following conditions (1)(6) are satisfied.

(1)Ais a -algebra over with the unit c0. (2)K= {c0, c1, ... ,cn} is a linear basis of A.

(3)K= K.

(4)cicj= nkijck, where nkijis a real number such that ci= cj n0ij> 0and ci cj n0ij= 0.

(5) nkij= 1for any i, j.

Σ

n k=0

Σ

n k=0

Bull. Nara Univ. Educ., Vol. 54, No.2 (Nat.),2005

Finite Commutative Hypergroups Associated with Actions of Finite Abelian Groups

Herbert HEYER*, Toshiya JIMBO, Satoshi KAWAKAMI and Ken-ichiroh KAWASAKI

(Department of Mathematics, Nara University of Education, Nara 630-8528, Japan) (Received May 2, 2005)

Abstract

This paper is devoted to constructing finite commutative hypergroups associated with actions of finite abelian groups, which are given as modifications of crossed products in operator algebras. This construction relies on the application of some notions of operator algebras, crossed products and con- ditional expectations.

Key Words:finite commutative hypergroup, group action, crossed product, conditional expectation

* Tübingen University

(3)

(6)cicj=cicjfor any i,j.

In the case that nkij>_ 0for any i, j, k, K= (K, A) = (K, A(K))is called a finite commutative hypergroup.

The weight of an element ciKis defined by w(ci) = (n0ij)−1where cj=ci. The total weight of Kis defined by w(K) =Σni=0w(ci).

For a finite commutative signed hypergroup K, a complex-valued function χon Kis called a character of K if

χ(ci)χ(cj) = nkijχ(ck)whenever cicj= nkijck. The set Kˆ of all characters of Kalso becomes a finite commutative signed hypergroup, and the duality Kˆˆ=K holds in the sense of signed hypergroups.

For a finite not necessary abelian group G the two hypergroups K(G)and K(Gˆ )are canonically defined. K(G)is introduced as the class hypergroup for which by definition each element of K(G)corresponds to a conjugacy class of Gunder the adjoint action of G. K(Gˆ )is defined as the set of normalized characters χof G, i.e. of all functions g χ(g) =tr(ρ(g)), where ρis an irreducible representation of Gand trdenotes the normalized trace. K(Gˆ )also becomes a finite commutative hypergroup. In this case we have K(Gˆ )=K(G).

3  Group actions and fixed point hypergroups Let αbe an action of a finite group Gon a finite commutative signed hypergroup K= (K, A(K)), where, for each gG, αgoperates on the set K = {c0, c1, ,cn} as -preserving permutations satisfying

αg(ci)αg(cj) = nkijαg(ck)

if cicj= nkijck, and αgαh=αghfor g, h∈G. The action α of Gon Kinduces the action of Gon the associated - algebra A(K) of K, which will also be denoted by α. In this case, the canonical conditional expectation Efrom A(K) onto the fixed point algebra A(K)α is canonically defined by

E(x) = αg(x)for xA(K).

Let Kαdenote the image of K={c0, c1, ,cn} under the conditional expectation E. Then Kαbecomes a finite com- mutative signed hypergroup, and A(Kα) = A(K)α. Kα is called the fixed point hypergroup of Kunder the action α.

The action αof Gon Kalso induces an action αˆ of G on the dual Kˆ =0, χ1, . . . , χn} of Kby

αˆg(χj)(ci) =χj(α−1g (ci))for χjKˆand ciK.

In this way we obtain a finite commutative signed hyper- group Kˆαˆ which satisfies Kα= Kˆαˆ.

Let Gbe a finite group and λbe the regular repre- sentation of G. Then the set K ={λg; gG} is a finite hypergroup, and the associated algebra A(K) is the - algebra λ(G)''generated by λg(g∈G)on the Hilbert space l2(G). Let αbe the adjoint action of Gwhich induces the action αof Gon A(K) = λ(G)' '. Then we also obtain the fixed point hypergroup Kα= (Kα, A(K)α). It is easy to check that A(K)αis the center Z(A(K))of A(K)and Kαis the class hypergroup K(G)of G. This interpretation gives rise to the construction of hypergroups associated with actions of G.

This construction will be described in the next section.

4  Construction of hypergroups associated with actions

Let H= {c0, c1, , cn} ⊂A(H)be a finite commuta- tive hypergroup and Hˆ = {χ0, χ1, , χn} be the dual of H.

Then, there exist mutually orthogonal minimal projec- tions e0, e1, , enA(H)satisfying

ciej=χj(ci)ej.

The relationships between {c0, c1, ,cn} and {e0, e1,

, en} in A(H)are given by

ej= w(ci)χj(ci)ci, ci= χj(ci)ej. In particular,

e0= w(ci)ci

is called the Haar measure of Hwhich satisfies cie0= e0

for any ciH. The characters χ0, χ1, , χnare known to be orthogonal with respect to the inner product

f, g= w(ci)f(ci)g(ci).

Let Gbe a finite abelian group and αbe an action of Gon the finite commutative hypergroup H = {c0, c1, , cn} ⊂A(H). Then the action αof Gon the associated - algebra A(H)and the crossed product

A(H) αG=

{

agλg; agA(H), g∈G

}

is defined in the canonical way. For each element x A(H) αG, put

F(x) = w(ci)ciλgxλgci

Then we have the following lemma.

Lemma 1. The mapping Fis an operator-valued

Σ

g∈G n

Σ

i=0

1

|G|

1 w(H)

Σ

g∈G n

Σ

i=

0

1 w(H)

Σ

n i=0

1 w(H)

n

Σ

j=0

Σ

n i= 0

w(χj) w(H)

Σ

g∈G

1

|G|

n

Σ

k=0

n

Σ

k=0

n

Σ

k=0

n

Σ

k=0

Herbert HEYER Toshiya JIMBO Satoshi KAWAKAMI Ken-ichiroh KAWASAKI 24

(4)

weight from A(H) αGonto the center Z(A(H) αG)of A(H) αGsatisfying

F(ciλg) =_ cif(g)λg, where

_ci= αg(ci) and f(g) = 〈χj, αgj)〉ej. In particular,

F(c0) = 〈χj,χjej

is a positive and invertible operator in Z(A(H) αG).

Proof.

F(ciλg) = w(cj)cjλk(ciλg)λkcj

= w(cj)cjαk(ci)αg(cj )λg

=

(

αk(ci)

) (

w(cj)cjαg(cj )

)

λg

=_ cif(g)λg

where

_ci= αk(ci) and f(g) = w(cj)cjαg(cj).

Applying the formulae

cj= χi(cj)ei, αg(cj) = αg(χi)(cj)ei, we obtain

f(g) =

(

w(cj)χi(cj)αg(χi)(cj)

)

ei

= 〈χi, αg(χi)〉ei

= 〈χi,χiei

where

J(g) ={i; αg(χi) =χi} ={ i; αg(ei) =ei}.

Since we assumed Gto be an abelian group, J(g) ={ei; αg(ei) =ei} is α-invariant, namely, αk(J(g)) =J(g)for any k

G. This fact implies that λkf(g)λk=αk(f(g)) =f(g)for any kG. Moreover, f(g)αg(ci) =cif(g)holds for any ciH. It is clear that _

ciA(H)α. Then, we can see that F(ciλg) =cif(g)λgis an element of the center Z(A(H) αG) of A(H) αG. Since {ciλg; gG, ciH} is a basis of A(H)

αG, F(x)is in Z(A(H) αG)for any xA(H) αG. The bimodule property of Ffollows directly from the definition of F.

[Q.E.D.]

For each xA(H) αG, set E(x) =F(a1x)

where

a=F(c0) = 〈χj,χjej is a positive invertible operator in Z(A(H) αG).

Then Ebecomes a conditional expectation from A(H)

αGonto Z(A(H) αG)satisfying E(ciλg) =cie(g)λg

where

_ci= αg(ci), e(g) = ej, J(g) ={j; αg(ej) =ej}.

We note that _

ciHαand that e(g)is in A(H)α. For each g

G, set

X(g) =jHˆ ; αg(χj) =χj} and

Y(g) ={ciH; χj(ci) = 1for χjX(g)}.

Here, we note that J(g) ={j; χjX(g)}.

Proposition 2. If X(g)is a subhypergroup of Hˆ for each gG, we have the following:

(1)e(g)is the Haar measure of Y(g)and also of Y(g)α. (2){die(g)λg; diHα, gG} is a linear basis of Z(A(H)

αG).

Proof.(1)For χjHˆ and eiA(H), χj(ei) =δij

holds. Then e(g) = ej satisfies χj(e(g)) = 1if χjX(g)

0if χj

/

X(g).

The Haar measure η(g)of Y(g)is given by

η(g) = w(ci)ci

where w(Y(g)) = w(ci). For each χjX(g)we have χj(η(g)) = 1since χj(ci) = 1for ciY(g). For each χj

/

X(g)there exists ciY(g)such that χj(ci) ≠ 1because X(g)is characterized by

X(g) =Hˆ ; χ(ci) = 1for any ciY(g)}

if X(g)is a subhypergroup of Hˆ. The Haar measure η(g) satisfies ciη(g) =η(g), so that χj(cij(η(g)) =χj(η(g))holds.

Applying the fact that χj(ci) ≠ 1, χj(η(g))must be 0. Since each element of A(H)is characterized by the values of χj Hˆ, we obtain that e(g) =η(g). Let O0, O1, , Okbe the orbits of X(g)under the action αˆ of Gon X(g). Then the

c

Σ

i∈Y(g)

ci

Σ

∈Y(g)

1 w(Y(g))

i∈J(g)

Σ

i∈J(g)

Σ

g∈G

Σ

1

|G|

n

Σ

j=0

i∈J(g)

Σ

n

Σ

i=0

Σ

n j=0

1 w(H)

Σ

n i=0

n

Σ

i=0 n

Σ

i=0

Σ

n j=0

1

Σ

w(H)

k∈G

1

|G|

n

Σ

j=0

1

Σ

w(H)

k∈G

1

|G|

Σ

k∈G n

Σ

j=0

1

|G|

1 w(H)

k∈G

Σ

n

Σ

j=0

1

|G|

1 w(H)

n

Σ

j=0

Σ

n

Σ

j=0 g∈G

1

|G|

(5)

canonical minimal projections p0, p1, , pkin Y(g)αare given by pj= el(j= 0, 1, …, k)so that p0+p1+ … + pk=e(g). By similar arguments as above it is easy to see that e(g)is also the Haar measure of Y(g)α.

(2) It is known that D(g) ={die(g) ; diHα} is a hypergroup isomorphic to the quotient hypergroup Q(g) = Hα/Y(g)α. Then the set of D(g)is a basis in A(H)αe(g). Hence we see that the elements of K={die(g)λg; diHα, gG}

are mutually independent in Z(A(H) αG). It is clear that the linear hull of the set K={die(g)λg; diHα, gG} is Z(A(H) α G) because Ewas a conditional expectation from A(H) αGonto Z(A(H) αG). Hence we see that the set Kis a linear basis of Z(A(H) αG).

[Q.E.D.]

We note that the dimension of Z(A(H) αG)is equal to

|K| = |D(g)| = |X(g)αˆ|

by the fact that the dual of Q(g)is isomorphic to X(g)αˆ. In the previous paper [K-I] we constructed the finite commutative signed hypergroup K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ ) associated with an action αof a finite abelian group Gon a finite commutative signed hypergroup H. Here, we recall the construction of K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ ). The action αof Gon Hinduces the action αˆ of G on the dual Hˆ =0, χ1, , χn} of H. Let O0, O1, ,Ombe all orbits of Hˆ under the action αˆ of G and Gibe the stabilizer of Gcorresponding to each Oi(i= 0, 1, , m), namely,

Gi={gG ; αg(χ) =χ} for χOi

which does not depend on the choice of χOi, because Gis an abelian group. For each gG, X(g)was defined by X(g) =Hˆ;αg(χ) =χ}.

Let Hˆαˆ

=0, ρ1, , ρm} be the fixed point hyper- group of Hˆunder the action αˆ of Gon Hˆ. Here, we note that each ρiis defined by

ρi= χ (i= 0, 1, ,m).

Let τibe the Haar measure of the annihilator Zi=Gˆ ; τ(g) = 1for all gGi} of Gi, namely,

τi= τ (i= 0, 1, ,m).

Then K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ )was defined by

K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ ) ={ρi τ τi; i= 0, 1, ,m, τGˆ}

={ρi τ τi; i= 0, 1, ,m, τGˆ/Zi=Gˆ

i}.

In [K-I] we said that the action α(or the action αˆ )is regular if the following condition ()is satisfied for any g

G.

()If αˆg(χi) =χiand αˆg(χj) =χjfor χi, χjHˆ, then αˆgk) =χkholds for every ksuch that mkij≠ 0, where χiχj= mkijχk.

We will characterize the above regularity condition in the following lemma.

Lemma 3. In the above situation the following statements are equivalent:

(1)The action αis regular.

(2)GiGjGkfor every ksuch that mkij≠ 0.

(3)X(g)is a subhypergroup ofHˆ. (4)X(g)αˆ is a subhypergroup of Hˆαˆ.

We obtained the subsequent theorem in 1999.

Theorem([K-I]). If the action αis regular, then K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ )is a finite commutative signed hypergroup.

Lemma 4. If the action αis regular, then for ρi

Hˆαˆ and gGwe get the following:

(1)ρiX(g)αˆ if and only if gGi. (2)ρi(e(g)) =τi(g).

Proof.

Statement (1)follows immediately from the defini- tions. Since e(g)is the Haar measure of Y(g)α(the annihi- lator of X(g)αˆ)and τiis the Haar measure of Zi(the anni- hilator of Gi), one can see that

ρj(e(g)) = 1if ρjX(g)αˆ 0if ρj

/

X(g)αˆ

,

τj(g) = 1if gGi

0if g

/

Gi

.

The proof goes similar to the proof of (1) in Proposition 2. Hence we arrive at the equality (2).

[Q.E.D.]

Under these preparations we obtain our main theo- rem as follows.

Theorem 5. Let αbe an action of a finite abelian group G on a finite commutative hypergroup H={c0, c1,

, cn} ⊂A(H). If the action αis regular, then (1)K(H,G, α)is a finite commutative hypergroup.

(2)A(K(H,G, α)) =Z(A(H) αG).

(3)Kˆ (H,G, α)=K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ ).

m

Σ

k=0

Σ

τ∈Zi

1

|Zi|

χ

Σ

l∈Oi

1

|Oi|

Σ

g∈G

Σ

g∈G χ

Σ

l∈Oj

Herbert HEYER Toshiya JIMBO Satoshi KAWAKAMI Ken-ichiroh KAWASAKI 26

(6)

(4)Kˆ (Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ )=K(H,G, α).

Proof. (1)In Proposition 2we saw that {die(g)λg; diHα, gG} was a linear base of A(K(H,G, α)) =Z(A(H)

αG). We note that e(g1)e(g2) <_e(g1g2) for g1, g2G, since X(g1) X(g2)X(g1g2). We examine products of elements of K(H,G, α).

(die(g1)λg1)(dje(g2)λg2) =didje(g1)e(g2)λg1λg2

=didje(g1)e(g2)e(g1g2)λg1g2, where

didje(g1)e(g2) = nkij(g1, g2)dk. Then

(die(g1)λg1)(dje(g2)λg2) = nkij(g1, g2)dke(g1g2)λg1g2, where the structure constants nkij(g1, g2) are non-nega- tive.

Next, we examine the -operation (die(g)λg)=die(g)λg = die(g)λg−1, (die(g)λg)(die(g)λg)=die(g)λgdie(g)λg−1=didie(g).

Since didi = nkidk,

didie(g) = nkidke(g) = nkidke(g) + nkidke(g)

=

(

nki

)

e(g) + (others).

The Haar measure e(g)of Y(g)was defined by e(g) = w(d)d= d0+ (others).

Hence we see that

(die(g)λg)(die(g)λg)=

(

nki

)

d0+ (others).

The structure constant at d0is positive, and clearly the weight of die(g)λgis

w(die(g)λg) =w(Y(g))

(

nki

)

−1

Next we examine the case that dje(g1)λg1≠ (die(g)λg). (¡)In the case that g1g−1, λg1λg=λgg1and gg1e.

Hence the structure constant at d0 in the product (die(g)λg)(dje(g1)λg1)is zero.

()In the case that g1=g−1, but dje(g1) ≠ (die(g)), (die(g)λg)(dje(g−1)λg−1) =didje(g)λe=didje(g).

If diand djis in Y(g), die(g) =dje(g) =e(g)holds, conse- quently (dje(g))=e(g)=e(g) =die(g). Therefore the assumption dje(g−1) ≠ (die(g))implies that didj

/

Y(g). In

this case the structure constant at d0in didje(g)must be

zero.

From (¡)and ()we conclude that K(H, G, α)satisfies the axiom of a finite commutative hypergroup.

Assertion (2)follows from Proposition 2.

(3)Kˆ (H,G, α) K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ )is clear. We show that Kˆ (H,G, α)K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ ). Let χbe a character of K(H, G, α).

Then there exists ρjHˆαˆ

such that χ(die(e)λe) =χ(di) = ρj(di), since Hˆαˆ =Hα. On the other hand, there exists τ Gˆ such that χ(λg) =τ(g).

Hence we see that

χ(die(g)λg) =ρj(di)ρj(e(g))τ(g)

=ρj(di)τj(g)τ(g). (by (2)of Lemma 4.) Therefore

χ=ρj τjτK(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ ).

Statement (4)follows immediately from (3)by duality.

[Q.E.D.]

Remark 1. When H=K(N)for some finite abelian group N, we see that

K(H,G, α) =K(N αG),

where K(N αG)is the class hypergroup of the semidirect product group N αG.

Remark 2. The sequence

1HαK(H,G, α)K(G)1

is exact, namely, K(H,G, α)/Hα=K(G). On the other hand, we also note that

1K(Gˆ )K(Hˆ, Gˆ, αˆ )Hˆαˆ 1 is exact.

Example 1. H=K( 3), G= 2, α: 2Aut ( 3), namely, G={e, g} (g2=e), H={c0, c1, c2} (c21=c2, c22=c1, c1c2=c0), and αg(c0) =c0, αg(c1) =c2, αg(c2) =c1. In this case we get

Hα={d0, d1}, d21= d0+ d1, where

d0=c0, d1= (c1+c2).

The Haar measure e(g)of Y(g)α=Hαis given by e(g) = d0+ d1= (c0+c1+c2).

Then we see that

K(H,G, α) ={d0, d1, d2=e(g)λg}, 1

3 2 3 1 3

1 2

1 2 1 2

k∈Y(g)

Σ

k∈Y(g)

Σ

1 w(Y(g))

1 w(Y(g))

d∈Y(g)

Σ

1 w(Y(g))

k∈Y(g)

Σ

k∈

Σ

/Y(g) k∈Y(g)

Σ

m

Σ

k=0

Σ

m k=0

Σ

m k=0

m

Σ

k=0

参照

関連したドキュメント

Chikunji, Unit groups of cube radical zero commutative completely primary finite rings, Inter. Chikunji, Unit groups of a certain class of completely primary finite

Ayoub, On finite primary rings and their groups of units, Compositio Math.. Chikunji, On a class of finite

Motivated by a paper of Erovenko and Sury of 2008, we compute the exterior degree of a group which is the wreath product of two finite abelian p–groups (p prime)1. We find

We also obtain necessary conditions involving the rank of A and the exponent of its automorphism group, which allow us to construct large classes of abelian groups that fail to have

Shoda also showed that when a finite Abelian group is expressed as the direct product of primary Abelian groups whose orders are powers of distinct primes, the automorphism group of

finite groups over an algebraically closed field $k$ of prime characteristic.. $p$ ,

Ito, On finite groups with given conjugate types

Takegahara, The number of homomorphisms ffom a finite abelian group to. a