タスクネットワークの解析情報を用いたスケジューリング手法
全文
(2) t1 = T1.new() t2 = T2.new_array(M) t3 = T3.new_array(M*N) s1 = Stream.new() s2 = Stream.new_array(M) s1.connect(t1, IN) s1.connect(t2, OUT) for i in 0..M s2.connect(t2[i], IN) s2.connect(t3[i*N..(i+1)*N], OUT) end. 2. MegaScript MegaScript. 1. T1 S1 Ruby5). T2. 2.1. T2 M. S2. S2. MegaScript. T3. MegaScript. T3. T3. T3 N. N 2. input(1) FOR @arg[0] compute(100) END output(10) 3. Task. Stream. MegaScript 3 MegaScript ). ( 1. 2. 2.2 Cc. Ci. MegaScript MegaScript Cc Co 2). 3. −62− 2. Cc. 100 Co. arg[0] 10. Co.
(3) • Sequence. Branch. Indep. Dep. 4. 3.2. T1. T2. T1. Sequence. (1). .... Tn. T1. Indep. T2 Dep. (2). Branch. T1. (3) T2. (. ). (4). Sequence+loop. 4. 5. 4.1. 2.3 MegaScript create schedule. MegaScript. MegaScript. 3.. 4. Sequence. 3.1 Branch (1) (2). Indep Dep. Sequence+loop Sequence+loop • 4.1.1 •. −63− 3. ( 5 Sequence. (. ).. 5. ).
(4) Sequence T1. T1. T2. Sequence+loop T2. Indep. (1). (2). 7. input(1) 6. For @arg[0] conpute(50) output(1) END. MegaScript. 8. A. B. C. D. 9. T1 T1 7. 6. T2 T2 T1 T2. (2). • Sequence 4.2.1 Sequence • Indep. MegaScript Indep 8. • Dep Input Dep. 4. Indep • Sequence+loop. Dep. Output (. • • •. A: B: C:. •. D:. 9). Sequence+loop 4.2 B D. 7. (1). C 4 −64−.
(5) Cdi Cci. Ti. Cdi + Cci. Tj. Cdi. Ti. Cdi. Tj. Sequence. 4.3.1. Cci. Sequence. 10 Sequence. Ti. T j1. Cdi Cci. Cci +C di. Cdi Cci. Ti T jn. Cci +C di T j1. Cdi. 4.3.2 Cc T jn. Cd. Cdi. • Sequence 10 Sequence. 11. Ti Cdi1. T i1 C ci1. Tj. T in. Cdin Ccin. T i1. MAX(Cdi1+Cci1, .. , C din +C cin ). Cdi1 Cci1 Tj. T in. Tj Ti Cdi + Cci. Cdin Ccin. Ti Tj Ti. MIN(C di1, .. ,C din ). Tj. Ti Tj • 11. 12. Sequence Ti Ti. Cdi Cci. Ti. Cdi Cci. Tj1 . . . Tjn Ti. Ti Tj1 . . . Tjn. Tj. Cdi + Cci. Tj. Cdi. Ti. Tj1 . . . Tjn Ti. Tj1 . . . Tjn •. 13. 12 8. C 4.3. Ti1 . . . Tin Ti1 . . . Tin Cdi1 +. Tj Cci1 ,. . . ,Cdin + Ccin Tj Ti1 . . . Tin Ti1 . . . Tin Tj 5 −65−. Tj.
(6) T1. T2. 0 50. 50 50. T3. host1. host2. host1. host2. 0. 0. 50 100. T1. T3. 50. T5. 100 125. T2. 100 100 T4 25 T5 25. T4. T1. 50. T2. T3. T4 T5. 100 150. (1). (2). (3). 14. • 13 Sequence 4.4. 1). 14(1). 14(2) T1. T1 host2. 14(3). T1. T3 host1 100 150 T4 (1). ,. , , : MegaScript , SACSIS2003,. pp. 73–76 (2003). , , : MegaScript , 2003-HPC-95, pp. 113–118 (2003). 3) , , : MegaScript , 2003-HPC-95, pp. 119–124 (2003). 4) , , , , : , 2004HPC-100, pp. 19–24 (2004). 5) , : Ruby, ASCII (1999).. 2). T3. ,. host2 T5 175. host1 (2). 150. (2). 5. MegaScript. 6E −66−.
(7)
関連したドキュメント
However, recommending academic books, it need to consider difficulty of them and individual amount of knowledge as well as user’s preference. If the recommendation method considers
As genetically altered mice have been shown to be useful for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying brain functions, we applied the three-lever operant task to mice and
※ TCFD:「気候関連財務情報開示タスクフォース(Task Force on Climate-related Financial
本節では本研究で実際にスレッドのトレースを行うた めに用いた Linux ftrace 及び ftrace を利用する Android Systrace について説明する.. 2.1
*課題関連的訓練(task-related training)は,目的志向的訓練(task-oriented
(2013) “Expertise differences in a video decision- making task: Speed influences on performance”, Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 293
In particular, we show that the q-heat polynomials and the q-associated functions are closely related to the discrete q-Hermite I polynomials and the discrete q-Hermite II
解析の教科書にある Lagrange の未定乗数法の証明では,