• 検索結果がありません。

リモートセンシングによる伊豆鳥島の2002年年噴火後の地殻変動と温度分布の観測

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "リモートセンシングによる伊豆鳥島の2002年年噴火後の地殻変動と温度分布の観測"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)  /,  (,**1)  +  0-ῌ03 .  . 

(2)  ,**,   .     .  . . ,**/ ++

(3) ,.

(4)  ,**0 ++

(5) 3

(6) . Crustal Deformation and Surface Temperature Distribution Observed by Remote-Sensing Techniques after the ,**, Izu-Torishima Eruption Yutaka WADA, Tetsuya JITSUFUCHI, Hiroshi OHKURA and Motoo UKAWA The volcanic island, Izu-Torishima, erupted in August, ,**,. The National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention observed the crustal deformation and surface temperature distribution of the island after the eruption by using remote-sensing techniques of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Rader (InSAR) and airborne Multi-Spectral Scanner (MSS). The InSAR image from RADARSAT-+ data acquired about +/ and .* days after the eruption exhibits no large deformation exceeding several centimeters for the entire island, showing the limit of the analysis without any ground control points (GCPs). However, a small local movement (less than ,.2 cm) is observable at the center of the island. The airborne MSS, VAM-3*A, obtained the surface temperature distribution from infrared bands and pseudo-color images from visible and near-infrared bands almost one year after the eruption. The high-temperature area (over 1*C) is limited around the central crater, where the ground surface is covered by sublimed sulfur. The highest temperature of 2*C is detected in this area. Key words : Izu-Torishima ,**, eruption, remote sensing, InSAR, multi spectral scanner. +   . HW ƒ„12 †9B<J5/:. ,**, 2

(7)  0- . DE‡UˆBI‰Š<012‹+BJK*.   ,**- ;  !". MN+ u12BŒŽ<mn SAR #1‘. "#$%&'() ,**,* +! /2*. ’“”ƒ„;&`* BW DEM `Ho<:. km ,  Fig. + -./01234. #=F •–>:— /* m ?˜™ 9 š—"@˜›. !5"6789#:0$; ,.1 km <=0. +o<:#=F •+ : ,/*** :œ—™ 91*. >? ,**/* ,**, @+%A&BC'DEFBG. /HIBJKL M N +OP(Q SAR Synthetic. , RADARSAT-+

(8) . . Aperture Radar %RS7TUV W1XYZ[(Q MSS. MN+ ,**, 2

(9) ,1

(10) W1žA

(11) Ÿ `ž. Multi-Spectral Scanner \)*]^_ `I2 , a+.  ,.

(12) + „  Ÿ 3

(13) ,*

(14)  RADARSAT-+ OP. bcUdefgfhi,1C'-j9kl. 1KH¡B./‡Uˆ91IH,¢mn£9FB. * .mn SAR i,5IH+ o/p. I :¤C'’¥9kl* OP(Q./ SAR. 01./qr+=0 2st Ohkura +332 u/. ef¦+ C §f¨ ©)– /.- GHz )* /.0 cm ª. v\w+x3yz4{L|}5 (GCP) 9/. «¬­)91IHW ,¢mn£1ef®¯U. ~6:0u`7B8€&B9‚?`. d°±UVU<:D¢‚&BC'9’¥:0u`.  ²-*/ῌ***0 ³´µ5wt¶E·¸ -ῌ+ F¹)"º»'(¼ National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, -ῌ+, Tennodai, Tsukuba City,. Ibaraki Pref. -*/ῌ***0, Japan. Corresponding author : Yutaka Wada e-mail : [email protected].

(15) ef ghijklhNm nhop/q. 64. Fig. +. Topographic map of Izu Torishima. We used a map extracted from “+ : ,/,*** Scale Topographic Map”, issued by the Geographical Survey Institute English texts, arrows, north arrow, and scale are edited by the authors.. Fig. -. Coherence map with +,P+, window size. The average coherence is *..-.. Fig. ,. Interferogram of Izu Torishima, generated from RADARSAT-+ data pair (acquired on ,**,/*2/,1 and ,**,/*3/,*).. Fig. .. Corrected interferogram of Izu Torishima (generated from the same pair as Fig. ,). We adjusted the orbital parameters to make the phase around the entire island flatten..  

(16) +* m . < Fig. ,  45=>01?@!A B. . CDE Fig. - F:G:01 HI Fig. - JK. 

(17)   !" # $%&'"(). %(L M(NO

(18) +,P+, QR S TU. * EarthViewTM % %+!,-./. IV?@!A BWXY

(19) *..- Z7 [\].  Table + 01 23456789:45;. H4589: ^_`a

(20) bcdU.

(21) ´µt¶·¸¹¸º»LM ,**, NF¼ 'p!ª4 Table +.. Description of DInSAR source.. Table ,.. 65. Position and velocity errors of RADARSAT-+.. Table -. Rotation measurement and drift errors of RADARSAT-+.. V+‚! n& |' | .}A: w  ,:0ƒS!{l   . 

(22)   MSS . +.3 cm ;,/- „ †‡S1C 4S?ˆ^,|.‰y.  (Fig. /) . y2RS!{l ,.2 cm ;+ „ †‡C.

(23)   !"#$ %. '. &' Fig. , ()* +  ,

(24) -,. /3 : DEM gh3Š‹> ?Œ Ž4?,5>?‘*’. ./012' /34015". ' )) “”MN 6.stu•. )* (67)8! .9. –9‹—7 (baseline) Y1 2./ m 8. : ;<=9>?@"

(25) :ABC 8. V ,/- „ †‡G

(26) 3Š>?{l ,**ῌ. !%&' DE  4019:. -** m ˜™3Š>?d5^. F) G

(27) 9>?BHIJKL'. %&9.' D ,5>?š"F)›œ €. Fig. , MN)OPQRS4J. "ŽžŸ:)V 3 ;2 X¡:. (TUV

(28) 9W)* 3 X ,* <=9. )VŠ‘ D 3 X¡:)V‘C . Y1 Z,.* m [ Z*.***,2-\WJ]). ;¢) r lŽJ£<(¤. ^ Fig. . ' RADARSAT-+ <=_`9a. ¥MNstuJ6. = (+333) ¦‘*§¨)'. b1B c,0 m [B c*.+\ d.  :©>J%?) 3Š .** m RžŸª. (Table ,, Table -) Wd^e. ?3. +,* m «UŽ ¬3­;¢J. TUV Fig. , (401J9:

(29) F. F)' ›œ ,/- „ †‡4S?5r.  f)3.' 4019>?B^ 3Vgh. ­žŸ‹{l +* hPa Ž? ) ‘' 2 X¡3Š .** m. !#$ F

(30)  +C (0!". Rª ,31.1 K ;@AŽ -+.+ hPaC Ž. !)8! ; +#@

(31) $iC ,C.  ,0.+ hPa ;® 2.ῌC r FŽ. +jk+

(32) jk 4)8. @A) ;® +**ῌC ­;¢))*^ž. !.E ;D%C %&' )) l. ŸŽ?B / hPa ¯°3.' 3 X. 4m /9:)*en&8 . ¡ª ,31., K ;@AŽ -*.+ hPaC Ž. d o'p!@")*.Jq(

(33) r.  ,..2 hPa ;® 2,ῌC ‘' €"žŸd. 'm  GCP stu) '. Ž +* hPa .;¢)F

(34)  . +ῌ

(35) 1401vw*xy z+. Ž +..2 hPa ;® .3ῌC ­;¢). +{l ,/* m

(36) {l +** m ,|U&-3.. 3' 6C"3£’£ /3±.DŸ²E3. }A : ;/ - ~  ~ C q( |' . Ž ¬@%&9.' D F³#$.  :*xy z+6 €"3#@^). ´ N. et al., ,**/) GHIJ55K (Houlie.

(37) ¶d ·h°ῌ¸¹hHc ºh»»¼¼. 66.     (,**-) . 5), _09: G;[/ W ‚ .

(38)   

(39)   2  ,+ . ƒ‰  % 3y„ ,ῌ. km 9:JT5[.   2  +, +- +.   . )  vw9 "„ ,**/$ : 1 W\.

(40)  ! "+332  !

(41) # ,**,  !$. O:

(42) i) k 89' SAR Š †{‹Z. % ! & ' ( !. ŒWZ )i -./. ")*

(43) +,

(44) ' -.#/. ‡Ž\O]^_, JT9*  jk. 0$1 %%&''2(

(45) 3. ‘ˆ‰Š SAR

(46) 3gT ‹. )4)5 *+6, 789 -.. sW’\O_Œ“/ 1 C ”Y• SAR –YB_. /. 9 ERS-+/, RADARSAT-+ —‘ˆ

(47) 3gT. :;1  Fig. , Fig. . <1 -. sW’\5vw˜< Envisat ‘ˆ

(48). ŽE. ./01= 23>? ./01= @4. H@™š{_›)13/ L ”Y• SAR –. 5), "A61=1785 ,/- BCDE F. YB_9 JERS-+ ‘ˆ

(49) 3gTsW’. +.3 cm 9:$ )4G;<-./ H. (PATHœ0+ ; ROWœ,.3) vw* +33, 1. ./09I=J>) ?K )3* @A. +332 sgTsW’1 €mau /0ῌ. +LBCDEMN5F@G  KOKP. ,,* m 9: JT5ž‘Ÿ’s v \O_.  (,

(50) )423>1QH?5RS. Œ“/ 1 “'LB\” '<K. /  ./0=KI>JT5U. 5 •–)'“ P%—¡+˜. VWXYZK ([ (Fig. -) : 1LM<. )c‡ ( P \], ¢™ ?

(51) i)'“)13/ %%&'. [N5)/ \O]^_ *  :`a P78. 1= lš)')13/ JERSῌ+ ‘ˆ. +6, QH ,.2 cm 9:[ b;cH?).  +332  š{›: 1 ,**, 

(52). +6, R))13G;<N/. ~LB_œ“9: G;[3/.  +6, d eSHf

(53)  ,**-. ,**0  +  ž£Sr>gT‘ˆ ALOS "H.  / 1 ,**.  /  1Q GPS gT]^. £$ ¤rW¥•vXCŸ  L ”Y•"D›!XW.  "U hVW ,**.$/ :, X. ¦ (PALSAR) –YB‰Š/ ¡–YB +*.  + Y_Z? ,cm P [5 \] H?),. m JT5N§a\;_ q€m. ) ijk\O]^ ^_)/. x: + m ¨*Nx:[/ N:¢ 1** km £A © -..-ª «W•¤¥Ÿ¬ - km 9:„ _g. -  SAR. ' SAR

(54) . Tz" €m2()4“&7(QH +// BC.  +6, \O `P. DE9:[* y„s‚ƒ9: _gT9. [lm% (Ohkura, +332) ab "Hch d ,**+$. z" GCP )5€m_¦ Z9: . )c `noWpqrEs (Amelung and Day,. ? `§/. ,**,) otuve (Ferna ´ndez et al., ,**-) vuwW. xyYf (Bridges and Gao, ,**0) z{|}Ze. .

(55)  MSS . (Amelung et al., ,***) )cgh/ :.  

(56) ~¨­_©®9* jkª§. ~ 1QijTX. ¯‰Š° MSS [ VAM-3*A _{+«'±:. GPS TX

(57) , XklY_ GCP .  

(58). 

(59) #+«'¨­gT_²L/ VAM-3*A G¤. €m2(F@_i)i: G;[3/  . =2n / ”Y• 2n . ”Y•¬­>_¡E gT9. 51   P=n  +,_o. –YB_9/ b®E¤¯© -.* mrad "G¤=. Q) pq?r> " ]1st‚ƒ9:. 2n”Y•$ +./ mrad "2n”Y•$  8+N:. ur+$ vw b. (_, X * . -,*** m gTz"§a\; b³ 3 m. GCP 9: [9:Nx: F@9: G. ../ m [ "°ῌh‹ ,**,$/ VAM-3*A ‡”5). ;[3 -./  

(60) i)y„ - km. ª§±*2no´{ µ) —”Y•

(61) +. 9: z" †+TX

(62)  GCP _{< . ¶LB²T?* 8„²_·¨ Z DŒE. \]‡|)ˆ }~ 3, D €m2(D.  "±:¸¹$ ³'1¡E ´º?/.  _u9: €#[/ 1 P@4. Ž.

(63) y~ ,**,  2  gT_µq.

(64) ³œ*´µI¶I· %$¸¹ºR0 ,**, &{»0.¼'}eˆ0. Fig. /. Pseudo color image of Izu Torishima, observed on Aug.+*, ,**- (+/ : */ῌ+/ : +/ JST).. 67. Fig. 0. Brightness temperature image of Izu Torishima, observed with band 2 (2.**ῌ++.** mm). A white rectangle indicates the area shown in Fig. 1.. 

(65)  ,** 2  +*  (+/ : */ῌ+/ : +/ JST)     -,*** m  Fig. +  ! TS*,-+A " #$  %&'( )*+ ,-./0 123.4 /* m 567 8%9 1+ : ,/*** .:47 ;. <&=>?;@!A0; Fig. / 8%9 Fig. 0 B Fig. /  CDEFG0HIJ , - . 5KL. M *.0+ῌ*.03 mm *.2*ῌ+.+* mm +.//ῌ+.1/ mm6 0 )*+;N  F OP&QR0STUV*W" #X YZ [  .\][ [!&<$ ^ 4%X R0_` YZabcb$deeR0f  YZ

(66)  &<<deb$

(67)  gh E. [0i0bj( $ klmR (,**/)  d0[ enoB$2.p 8<&qrs0 t;u."vj!&<$ qCDEFGHIJ 8 <&w"<xyz;B$de( gh E0 [a{g|} ~B$qrs0;€ A0e€( $ Fig. 0 FG0HIJ 2 5K 2.**ῌ++.** mm6. "‚!ƒx„3( †D‡bx +.* "ˆb‰"#$eŠ‚!‹Œ!QR0„. Fig. 1. Surface temperature from calibrated image by atmospheric and topographic correction (assumed emmisivity²*.32), in the central part of Fig. 0.. ˆW"#$ ^4( Ž ˆ0 aR0f E !&<$deb$ ‘ ’0“„ˆ /0”C "#. d0R0f 0.  Fig. / 0CDEFGW. d0R0f 0. ˆ;!•B$ . ( YZ 

(68)  &8(¡.b#›!¢£"#$. HIJ 2 "!ƒx„3 x–"—˜™*. e¤¥¦ $ d0. ;{Œ§eŠ‚! “. J MODTRAN..* (Berk et al., +323) %$x–"—. ¨e“ž0ˆ¤‚3;©ªA$  {Œ§0x. ˜;@! 3(.0ƒx„30‘;š›. ; *.2/ῌ*.32 0$«eB$%¬3 (Salisbury and D’Aria,. ! 5œ)žŸ MODTRAN 0 Tropical ; 6. +33,) ­®¯x *.32 8%9 *.2/ °<&±!.

(69) 9; ‘ƒ’“”•ƒZ– —ƒ»˜¼™. 68.   *.32 

(70) . P4 71(Š‹/ 4P ./ῌ0*!C (/*ῌ1*!C).  

(71)  Fig. 1   Fig.. $

(72) 

(73) "01  D -5Œ. /  . $. Š‹/. SR     A   1*!C (2*!C). (/*!C) $

(74) -"#_HgG01P D . 

(75) "#$% &'

(76) (. 

(77) (71- $

(78) $. @ŽeCf. $()d=> +1 ./!C. *.2/ ) 

(79)  * A $(+. g(h$." [{`‚„ iN\1X D. ,-

(80) $. /0 !C "/ 01 " !". $(-.AŒ?<\P4 QT-"..   

(81) ( 2*!C (3+!C) $. 

(82) ‡4P( j‘k" ,**+ 6 +* }. .2 . # ./!C (/*!C) $

(83) %3&

(84) -4. '5"61" 71(/ 89: ;<( )=>+$?*+ ,$

(85) 

(86) $. @ '5-.A"/B (0$%C4 DEF6   B  C  0*!C (1*!C) 1G -*ῌ.* m $

(87) H;

(88) IJKL"6.  ,**, 6 3 }/. 

(89) T5l. P4 j‘kmn` ,**- ’“Š‹/ %3  Qo”T5$. ,**, 6 3 } Q + 6” ,**- 6 2 }/. v

(90) Z. %CI•(61– 7ev—pq( ˜rC.&IJ"C2 ™\. 1  D ? ./ῌ0*!C (/*ῌ1*!C) $

(91) 23 &::-M"61 E (,- 0-!C. /ῌ ῎ ῍ ῏. (1/!C) $

(92)  ". N  F G ( 0*!C. —pq ,**, 6Q”šJs› @. (1*!C) $

(93)  "OB P4. QR4ST5 ; ,-

(94) "/ 0 1 A ( +3/0ῌ/1 6P;701 U89V WX1:Y ; +3/2 B ( ,**,. tœyžuŸ H$(¡vw¢ SAR £L¤¥ ¦§w¢ MSS (VAM-3*A) xy ¨©Kª£L«L ¬/ ­C2  RADARSAT-+ ¡v/ 01 €KJ. 6;701 Z (pit crater) C ( +332 6;70.  —pqQz}”{Œ®}v|¯. 1 Z.A 1[1<\ ? <\1. AcBd hH&C uIJ"gG01  . ]=$^N1 H '5( Fig. . . 23IJ}(,Z ,.2 cm $

(95) $. 78e. >H?_@`abAcBd CD^. (šJ(šl$(C2 ™\ °  b.  ?$. / 8e"fC" E , F$g. $(±~²³€ GCP y4C4‚ƒy. G01 hH&IJ   

(96) (ij -*. P „ ´µŒCIJ(€#s›7. !C $

(97) $. fK P4C4 '5(QR4. "$%C4 _@ SAR †¶ƒy(‡. ST5 (Fig. /) 4P?k$ AcLlMN?. ·$." · -@ @( GCP C GPS. 61C4 Fig. - 4P?'5(OP %3. Xˆ/ ‰Š‹ QŒK&CT5¸,". PmnKoLp"-47 ?. 7IM(. Ž$.. QGMNR$(CF qS AIJQT-".. 

(98)  IJD^"r. Q{ + 6”¹º VAM-3*A /. .  QR4ST5(AcLlM <\1'. 47  U01SA(s@PV4MW/B. 5gG  N 

(99) T5(OP-5.  <\1 N  SR BP-5 I . gG  !"„  ,-

(100) (. -( Fig. . 45tN17  uIJ.  *.32 ) 2*!C  *.2/. 71.A vwX".QT-?.. ) 3+!C $

(101) $. 01 . xYZyz [{  AcB|:. RADARSAT-+ / €KJgG01 AcBd. }\B~€R 

(102) 3*ῌ+**!C . hH&IJ(%3&mnKoLp"-FO.   * +*ῌ/* cm ] "^_/B7 "`‚01P. P(::FC2P4 N  / 8e"fC". 4 abƒc ,**. ; abƒc ,**/ AcB. VAM-3*A QR4ST5$?IJD^. |[{„ ( Fig. 1  FƒG OB. (k$. .4ST5$?%3& P4. 0* !C (1*!C) $

(103) 

(104)  3†"‡% }\.  IJD^"r47  7IMSA(s@P. B~€

(105) ( E  0-!C (1/!C) . V4MW/B <\1. 

(106)  3†"‡F N  [{$(ˆ‰ -QGM 61MN"`‚01.

(107) •’¸¹º–»–— +f<- ,**, N1†‰$£¼.89 ῏. ῎. 

(108)       

(109) ! "#$%

(110)  &'()*+, &' -, ./01 2

(111)  34567 89:; ῌ ῑ ῐ ῍ Amelung, F. and Day, S. (,**,) InSAR observations of the +33/ Fogo, Cape Verde, eruption : Implications for the e#ects of collapse events upon island volcanoes. Geophys. Res. Lett., ,3, doi : +*.+*,3/,**+GL*+-10*. Amelung, F., Jo ´nsson, S., Zebker, H. and Segall, P. (,***) Widespread uplift and ‘trapdoor’ faulting on Gala ´pagos volcanoes observed with radar interferometry. Nature, .*1, 33-ῌ330. Berk, A. , Bernstein, L. S. and Robertson, D. C. (+323) MODTRAN : A Moderate Resolution Model for LOWTRAN 1, Air Force Geophysics Laboratory Technical Report, GL-TR-23-*+,,, Hanscom AFB, MA. Bridges, D. L. and Gao, S. (,**0) Spatial variation of seismic b-values beneath Makushin Volcano, Unalaska Island, Alaska. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., ,./, .*2ῌ.+/. Ferna ´ndez, J., Yu, T. -T., Rodrı ´guez-Velasco, G., Gonza ´lezMatesanz, J., Romero, R., Rodrı ´guez, G., Quiro ´s, R., Dalda, A., Aparicio, A. and Blanco, M. J. (,**-) New geodetic monitoring system in volcanic island of Tenerife, Canarias, Spain. Combination of InSAR and GPS techniques. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., +,., ,.+ῌ ,/-. Houlie ´, N., Briole, P., Nercessian, A. and Murakami, M. (,**/) Sounding the plume of the +2 August ,*** eruption of Miyakejima volcano (Japan) using GPS, Geophys. Res. Lett., -,, doi : +*. +*,3/,**.GL*,+1,2. < =>? @A

(112) ?B CD?  ?E ?. 69. F G ? H I ? )> ? BJKLM (,**-) NF ,**, NOP; NF .2, ,-/ῌ,-3; ?QR? S?TUV?WX Y? Z[I?(T\ (,**,) ]^_`abcd& e +fgF ,*** Nbhi; NF .1, ,31ῌ-,-; j8klj m!" (,**-) j#NFnop$ "qr; NFN%s&'tt! u 2- v +*-ῌ+*3; j8klj m!"?  wxy(z{|} (,**,)  ,**,  2 ~NOP; u 3- NFN %s&'t€) ‚l (,**/) *pNFx+ ƒu - ,„; ‚l .-1ῌ ..*; ( )?  ) (,**.) <-NF†‡p$ˆ ,†‰$; *NFt ,**. .Š‹ tŒ% . 20; Ohkura, H. (+332) Applications of SAR data to monitoring Earth surface changes and displacements. Advances in Space Research, ,+, .2/ῌ.3,. Ž /? (,**+) RADARSAT DInSAR +fD‘†‰$’“”•–—; ˜™š›} ,*, No. ,, +-0ῌ+-1; Salisbury, J. W. and D’Aria, D. M. (+33,) Emissivity of Terrestrial Materials in the 2ῌ+. mm Atmospheric Window. Remote Sens. Environ, .,, 2-ῌ+*0.  (+333) SAR œž0 *Ÿf 1¡¢£  ¤¥¦§2¨34©†‰$ª«¬­5©; † t® ./, -,1ῌ-.0;  )?( ) (,**.) <-NFp$; *NFt ,**. .Š‹ tŒ%. +/.;  )?( ) (,**/) <-NFp$; ¯°  w0{|w{|!± †²6³} ,,, ,-ῌ,1; ´A= (+3/2) NFp$µ (I); ¶‡h! ,-, ,+ῌ -0; ƒ .·7 1 2

(113) „.

(114)

Fig. - . Coherence map with +, P +, window size.
Fig. 1 . Surface temperature from calibrated image by atmospheric and topographic correction (assumed emmisivity ² *

参照

関連したドキュメント

○「調査期間(平成 6 年〜10 年)」と「平成 12 年〜16 年」の状況の比較検証 . ・多くの観測井において、 「平成 12 年から

敷地からの距離 約48km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山..

敷地からの距離 約66km 火山の形式・タイプ 複成火山.. 活動年代

敷地からの距離 約82km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山. 活動年代

敷地からの距離 約82km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山.

敷地からの距離 約48km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山.

敷地からの距離 約99km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山?. 活動年代

都内の観測井の配置図を図-4に示す。平成21年現在、42地点91観測 井において地下水位の観測を行っている。水準測量 ※5