• 検索結果がありません。

Page-98: Line;+25, “pointwiseg-absorbing” should read as “g-absorbing”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Page-98: Line;+25, “pointwiseg-absorbing” should read as “g-absorbing”"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications ISSN: 1821-1291, URL: http://www.bmathaa.org Volume 4 Issue 4 (2012), Pages 45-46.

AN ERRATUM TO “PROVING COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS FOR LIPSCHITZ TYPE MAPPINGS VIA

ABSORBING PAIRS”,

(COMMUNICATED BY DENNY LEUNG)

D. GOPAL, M. IMDAD, M. HASAN, D. K. PATEL

On critical examination of our results presented in [1], we notice some minor errors except a crucial one (Example 3.7). In all, we need to carry out the following corrections:

1. Page-96: Line;+21, “f u=f gu=f f u” should read as “f u=f gu=gf u”.

2. Page-96: Line;+26, “set of realsR” should read as “set of positive realsR”.

3. Page-98: Line;+25, “pointwiseg-absorbing” should read as “g-absorbing”.

4. Page-98: Line;-2, “pointwiseg-absorbing” should read as “g-absorbing”.

5. Page-99: Line;+26, “pointwiseg-absorbing” should read as “g-absorbing”.

6. On page-98, Example 3.7, should read (corrected version) as follows:

Example 3.7. LetX = (−1,1]∪ {2,3,4}anddbe the usual metric onX. Define f, g:X →X as

f x=





























3

5 , if −1< x <−1/2 x

4 , if −1/2≤x≤1/2 3

5 , if 1/2< x <1 3, ifx= 1,4 2, ifx= 2,3,

gx=





















3

4 , if −1< x <−1/2 x

2 , if −1/2≤x≤1/2

−3

4 , if 1/2< x <1 2 , ifx= 1,2,3,4,

2000Mathematics Subject Classification. 47H10, 54H25.

Key words and phrases. Absorbing maps,R-weakly commuting maps, Common Fixed Point.

2012 Universiteti i Prishtin¨c es, Prishtin¨e, Kosov¨e.

Submitted October 24, 2012. Published November 10, 2012.

45

(2)

46 D. GOPAL, M. IMDAD, M. HASAN, D. K. PATEL

Thenf andgsatisfy all the conditions of Theorem 3.6 and have two common fixed points namely 0 and 2 but the pair (f, g) is not Lipschitzian wheneverx= 1 and y= 2. Further, atx= 1,f andgdo not satisfy the condition

d(f x, f f x)6= max{d(gx, gf x), d(f x, gx), d(f f x, gf x), d(f x, gf x), d(gx, f f x)}

whenever the right hand side is non zero.

References

[1] D. Gopal, M. Imdad, M. Hasan, D. K. Patel, Proving common fixed point theorems for Lipschitzian type mappings via absorbing pair, Bull. Math. Anal. Appl., 3(4)(2011), 92-100.

(D. Gopal) Department of Mathematics and Humanities S.V. National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India - 395 007.

E-mail address: [email protected] / [email protected]

(M. Imdad)Department of Mathematics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202 002, India.

E-mail address: [email protected]

(M. Hasan)Department of Mathematics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202 002, India.

E-mail address: [email protected]

(D. K. Patel)Department of Mathematics and Humanities S.V. National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India - 395 007.

E-mail address: [email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Maluta, Fixed points of uniformly Lipschitzian mappings in spaces with uni- formly normal structure, Nonlinear Anal.. Ray, Uniformly Lipschitzian semigroups in Hilbert

The aim of this paper is to obtain common fixed point of mappings sat- isfying generalized contractive type conditions without exploiting the notion of continuity in the setting

Rhoades, Assad-Kirk-type fixed point theorems for a pair of nonself mappings on cone metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2009, (2009) 16 pages.. Radenovi´ c, Common fixed

Radenovi´ c, Common fixed point theorems for contractive mappings satisfying Φ–maps in S-metric spaces, Acta Univ. Todorˇ cevi´ c, Harmonic Quasiconformal Mappings and Hyperbolic

In this paper, we have studied unique common fixed point theorems for two pairs of compatible mappings and compatible of type (A) in complete metric space.. Keywords: Complete

Vetro, Common fixed points of mappings satisfying implicit contractive conditions, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2012:105 (2012).. Chatterjea, Fixed point theorem,

5 have pointed out that the results obtained by Gahler for his 2 metrics are independent, rather than generalizations, of the corresponding results in metric spaces, while in

6 gave a coupled fixed point theorem for contractions in fuzzy metric spaces, and Fang 7 gave some common fixed point theorems under φ-contractions for compatible and weakly