• 検索結果がありません。

現在進行形の否定文

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "現在進行形の否定文"

Copied!
1
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Step1説明 Step1説明

11

Part3 Date ( ) 


Name (

基本文

▶ 私は今勉強していません。

現在進行形の否定文

▶ 彼は今サッカーをしていません。

You are not speaking English now.

Step2並び替え

次の日本文に合うように、(    )内の英語を並び替えなさい。

(1) あなたは今,英語を話していません。


( not / you / now / English / speaking / are ).

(2) その男の子たちは今公園で走っていません。

( are / now / the / park / the boys / running / in / not / . )

The boys are not running in the park now.

Step3英訳

次の日本語を英語に直しなさい。

(1) 彼は今本を読んでいません。

(2) 私たちは今野球をしていません。

He’s not reading a book now.

We’re not playing baseball now.

(3) 私は今朝食を食べていません。

( not / eating / breakfast / I’m / now / . )

I'm not eating breakfast now.

I’m not studying now.

アイムノットスタディング ナウ

He’ s not playing soccer now.

ヒーズ ノット プレイング  サッカー ナウ

参照

関連したドキュメント

In particular we conclude that the Lorentz covariant nonlinear Dirac equations we have explicitly studied in this paper are not gauge equivalent to the linear Dirac equation.

where it does not matter). 10.4] for a discussion of the relation between sequences of this form and elliptic divisibility sequences defined via a bilinear recurrence or the sequence

In the latter half of the section and in the Appendix 3, we prove stronger results on elliptic eta-products: 1) an elliptic eta-product η (R,G) is holomorphic (resp. cuspidal) if

An integral inequality is deduced from the negation of the geometrical condition in the bounded mountain pass theorem of Schechter, in a situation where this theorem does not

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

In [11, 13], the turnpike property was defined using the notion of statistical convergence (see [3]) and it was proved that all optimal trajectories have the same unique

ppppppppppppppppppppppp pppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp ppppppppppp pppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp pppppppppppppppppppp

We now prove that the second cohomology groups of irreducible peculiar modules which are not mentioned in the formulation of theorem 1.1 are trivial.. The lists of highest weights