• 検索結果がありません。

WORDS TWO

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "WORDS TWO"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Internat. J.

VOL. 17 NO. 4 (1994) 681-686

FIXED POINT THEOREMS FOR A SUM OF TWO MAPPINGS IN LOCALLY CONVEX SPACES

RVIJAYARAJU

Department

ofMathematics

AnnaUniversity Madras 600 025, India

(Received May

2, 1991 andinrevised form March12,

1992)

ABSTRACT. Cain and Nashed generalized to locally convex spaces a well known fixed point theorem of Krasnoselskii for a sum ofcontraction and compact mappings in Banach spaces. The class of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings includes properly the class of nonexpansive mappings aswellas theclass ofcontraction mappings.

In

this paper, weprove by using thesame method some results concerning the existence of fixed points for a sum of nonexpansive and continuous mappings and also a sumof asymptotically nonexpansive and continuous mappings in locallyconvexspaces. These results extendaresult of Cain and Nashed.

KEY

WORDS AND PHRASES. Asymptotically nonexpansive and continuous mappings, uniformly asymptoticallyregularwithrespecttoamap.

1991

AMS SUBJECT

CLASSIFICATION

CODES.

47H10,54H25.

1.

INTRODUCTION.

Let K be a nonempty closed convex bounded subset of a Banach space

x. In

1955, Krasnoselskii

[6]

proved first that a sum T

+

S of two mappings T and S has a fixed point in K, when T:K.-X is a contraction and S:K--,X is compact

(that

is, a continuousmappingwhich maps bounded sets into relatively compact

sets)

and satisfies the condition that T;r.

+

Sy

.

K for all

:,yeK. Nashed and

Wong [7]

generalized Krasnoselskii’s theorem to sum T

+

S of a nonlinear

contraction mapping T of K into X

(that

is, [[Tz-Ty[[ <([[z-yl[) for all z,Ve K, where is a real valuedcontinuous functionsatisfyingcertain

condition)

andacompact mapping SofK into X.

Subsequently, Edmunds

[4],

Reinermann

[8]

extended Krasnoselskii’s theorem to a sum T

+

S ofa nonexpansive mappingTandastronglycontinuousmappingS

(that

is, acontinuousmapping from the weak topology of

x

to the strong topology of

x)

when

the

underlying spaces

x

are Hilbert spacesand uniformlyconvexBanachspacesrespectively.

Krasnoselskii’s theorem was further extended by Cain and Nashed

[2]

to a sum T

+

S of a

contractionmappingTofanonempty completeconvexsubset Kofalocallyconvex space X into X and a continuous mappings S of K into X. Sehgal and Singh

[9]

generalized the above result of Cain and Nashed

[2]

to a sum T

+

S of a nonlinear contraction mapping T of K into X and a continuousmappingSofK intoX. Thisresultgeneralizes theresult of Nashedand

Wong [7].

The study of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings concerning the existence of fixed points have become attractive to the authors working in nonlinear analysis, since the asymptotically

(2)

682 P. VIJAYARAJU

nonexpansivemappings include nonexpansiveaswellascontractionmappings. Goebel and Kirk

[5]

introduced the concept of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces and proved a

theoremonthe existenceoffixedpoints for suchmappingsin uniformlyconvexBanach spaces.

The aim of this paper is to prove fixed point theorems for a sum of nonexpansive and continuous mappings in locally convex spaces. Throughout this paper, let X denote a Hausdorff locally convex linear topological space with a family

(Pa)a

eJ of seminorms which defines the topologyon

x,

whereJ is any indexset.

Werecall thefollowingdefinition.

DEFINITION 1.1. Let Kbeanonemptysubset of

x.

IfTmaps KintoX, then

(a)

T is called a contraction

[2]

iffor each c J, there is a real number

kc

with 0_<ka< such

that

p(Tx r)_<k,p(x- )

(b)

T iscalledanonexpansive ifka in

(a).

(c)

T iscalledanasymptotically nonexpansive

[11]

if

for all x,vin K.

pa(Tnz

Tny) <knpcr(x y) for all x,Vin K,

foreacha d and forn 2, where{kn}isasequenceof real numbers such thatlira kn 1.

Itis assumed that

kn

> and

kn

>

kn +

forn 1,2

IVeintroducethefollowingdefinition.

DEFINITION 1.2. If T and $ map K into X, then T is called a uniformly aymptotically regularwithrespect to$if,for eachaindandr/>0, thereexists N N(a,,/) such that

pa(Tnx-

Tn

Ix +

Sx) <r/ foralln>Nand for allxin K.

EXAMPLE

1.3. Let X RandK [0,1].

WedefineamapT:K--,XbyTx

+

xfor allxinK.

Then

T2x

T(1

+

x) 2

+

z.

By

induction,weprovethat

Tnx

n

+

z.

Wedefineamap S: K-XbySz forallxin K.

Therefore

Tnx Tn- lx +

Sx 0.

Hence

T isuniformlyasymptoticallyregularwithrespecttoS.

REMARK

1.4. T isuniformlyasymptoticallyregularwithrespect tothezerooperatormeans that T is uniformly asymptoticallyregular

[11].

Thefollowingexampleshownin

[11]

that uniform asymptoticregularityisstrongerthan asymptoticregularity.

Let

X

eP,

<p<ooandKdenote the closedunitballin

x.

DefineamapT:K-by

Tx

(2,3

for allz

(t[i,2,3

K.

2.

MAIN RESULTS.

We

state the following TychonoWs theorem and Banach’s contraction principle which will be used toproveourtheorems 2.1 and2.2.

THEOREM A [10].

Let K be a nonempty compact convex subset ofX. If T is continuous mapping ofK intoitself,thenThasafixed pointin K.

(3)

FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN LOCALLY CONVEX

THEOREM B [2].

Let K be a nonempty sequentially complete subset of X. If T is a contractionmapping of K intoitself, then Thasauniquefixed point u in K and Tnx--.,u for allrin K.

The following theorem is an extension of Theorem 3.1 of Cain and Nashed

[2]

for a sum of

contraction and continuous mappings to a sum of certain type of asymptotically nonexpansive mapping Tandcontinuous mappingSinlocallyconvexspacesXbyassuming theconditionsthatT is uniformly asymptoticallyregularwithrespectto Sand

Tnx +

SyEKfor allr,yinKandn 1,2 Thisresult isnewevenin thecaseof normedlinear spaces.

THEOREM

2.1 Let K be a nonempty compact convex subset of X. Let T be an

asymptotically nonexpansive self-mapping of K. Let S be a continuous mapping of K into X.

Suppose

that T isuniformly asymptotically regular self-mappingof K withrespect to themapping Sand that

Tnz +

Sy

_

Kfor all z,yeKandn 1,2 ThenT

+

Shas afixedpoint in K.

PROOF. Foreachfixedyin K,wedefineamap HnfromK to Kby Hn(z

an(Tnz +

SV) for allzeK.

where an (1- 1/n)/kn and {kn} is an in Definition

1.1(c).

SinceT isasymptoticallynonexpansive, itfollows that

pa(Hn(a)- Hn(b))

anPa(Tna- Tnb)

<(1-1/n)t,a(a-b) for alla,bin K.

HenceHnis acontractionon K.

By

Theorem

B,

Hnhasauniquefixedpoint,say,Lnyin K.

Therefore

Lny Hn(LnY

an(Tn(Lny) +

Sy).

Let

u,v

.

Kbe arbitrary. Thenwehave Therefore

pct(Lnu

Lnv

<

anpa(Tn(Lnu) Tn(Lnv)) +

anpa(Su Sv) _<(1 1/n)pa(

Lnu Lnv

4-anpa(Su Sv)

(2.2)

Tnzn

Tn

lz

n

+ Szn---,O

asn--.oo.

From (2.4)

and

(2.5)we

obtain

zn-Tn

-lznO

as

(2.5)

pct(Lnu-

Lnv

<nanpa(Su-Sv).

SinceS iscontinuous,Lnis continuous.

Using TychonoffsTheorem

A,

we seethatLnhasafixedpoint, say,

rn

in K. Therefore

xn

Lnx

n

an(Tnr,

n

+

S:n).

(2.3)

Hence zn-Tnr,n-SXn

(an

1)(Tnn +

SZn)--Oas n-oo, since an--,l as n--cx and Kis bounded

and

Tn +

Sy Kfor all,yE K.

(2.4)

Since T is uniform!y asymptoticallyregularwithrespecttoS,itfollows that

(4)

684 P. VIJAYARAJU

Now

po(Zn-(T

+

S)zn) < po(Zn-(Tn

+

S)n)

+

po,((Tn

+

S)Zrn-(T

+

S)zn)

<po(Zn-(Tn

+ S)Zn)+ klPo(Tn- lz

n

Zn).

Using

(2.4)

and

(2.6)in (2.7)

weget

zn (T

+

S)zn--,Oasn-,.

Since K is compact, thereexistsasubnet

(z/)

of the sequence{zn}such that

u forsomeu K.

SinceTand Sarecontinuous,itfollowsthat

(I-(T

+ S)(fl))

(I-(T

+

S))(u)

andby

(2.8)

weget

(z.7)

-

(T

+ S)(,)

0.

Since

x

is

Hausdorff,

itfollowsthat (I-(T

+

S))(u)=0.

Hence

T

+

Shasafixed point

For nonexpansive mapping T, the condition that T is uniformly asymptotically regular with respect to the map S is not needed in the following theorem. This theorem is an extension of Theorem 3.1 of Cain and Nashed

[2]

for a sumofcontraction and continuous mappings inlocally convexspaces.

THEOREM

2.2. Let Kbeanonemptycompact convexsubset ofX.

Let

Tbeanonexpansive mapping of K into X and S be a continuous mapping of K into X such that Tz

+ St

fiK for all

t K. ThenT

+

Shas afixed pointin K.

PROOF.

Foreach fixedtin K,wedefineamap//nfromK to Kby

Hn(.

An(T

+

Sy)forall K,

where

{An}

is asequenceof real numbers with0<An< and,nl asnc.

Proceeding as inthe above

theorem,

weobtain a sequence

{n}

in K such that SinceK iscompact and

{Xn}

CK, thereexistsasubset

(x#)

ofthe sequence

{n}

such that

/ forsome:inK.

Therefore

z/ ,/(Tz/+ Sz/).

Since T and S arecontinuous, it follows that (T

+

S)z.

Hence

T

+

Shasafixed point inK.

The following example shows thattheabove theorem cannotbe deduced from Theorem2.1.

EXAMPLE

2.3.

Let

X=space (s), the space of all sequences of complex number whose topologyisdefinedbythe family ofseminormsPndefinedby

pn(X) rna[ for

(1,2

Xand n 1,2,....

LetK={,X:Ijl

<lforj=l,2 }.

ThenK iscompact

[3,

Problem 47,p.

346].

AlsoK is convex.

Wedefineamap TfromKtoKbyTz (3/4) :forallz K. ThenT isnonexpansive.

WedefineamapSfromKtoKby

Su

(1/4)ufor all K. ThenS is continuous.

Ifa,b K, thenwehave

Pn(Ta

+

Sb)< (3[4)pn(a)

+

(l[4)Pn(b).

(5)

FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN LOCALLY CONVEX SPACES 685 ThereforeTa+Sb

_

Kfor alla,b EK.

Suppose

that (1,0 )EK. Thenwehave

T(el)

(3/4,0,0 ), Tm-

l(el)

((3/4)m-

1,0,0

Tin(el)

((3/4)m,0,0 and

S(el)

(1/4,0

Therefore

Pn(Tm(el)_T

m-

l(el) + S(el))=

1(3/4)m_(3/4)m-

+

1/4[

1(1/4)(1-(3/4)m-

1)1-,1/4

as m-oo.

HenceT is notuniformly asymptoticallyregularwithrespect to S.

Thefollowing exampleshows that if thecondition Tx

+

Syin Kfor allx, y Kof Theorem 2.2is dropped,then theconclusionof theoremfails.

EXAMPLE

2.4. LetX RandK [0,1].

We define a map T from K to K by Tx=x/2 for all zeK. Then T is a contraction and hence nonexpansive.

We

defineamapSfromK toKbySy for allyEK. Then S is continuous.

Suppose

that 3/4,b K. Then Ta

+ Sbl

11/8 < K. ThereforeTa

+

Sb

f

Kforsome a,b

.

K.

Ifu is afixed point ofT

+

Sin K, then u Tu

+

Su (u/2)

+

and therefore u 2$ K.

Hence

T

+

S hasnofixedpointin K.

Toproveof thefollowing Theorems2.5and 2.6,weneed thefollowingextensionofTychonoff’s Theorem

A.

THEOREM C

[1,

p.

169].

LetK beanonempty closedconvexsubset ofalocallyconvexspace X. IfT is acontinuousmapping ofK intoitselfsuch that T(K)is contained ina compactsubsetof K,thenThasafixedpointin K.

In

Theorems 2.5 and2.6, thecompactnessof the set KofTheorems 2.1 and 2.2is

replaced

by

aweaker condition that the set K is a completeand bounded set, but the mappings T and S are required to satisfy additional conditions that S(K) is contained insome compact subsets of Kand (I T S)(K)isclosed.

THEOREM

2.5.

Let

K be a nonempty complete bounded convex subset ofX.

Let

T bean

asymptoticallynonexpansiveself-mapping ofK.

Suppose

that Sis acontinuousmapping ofKinto X such that S(K) is contained in some compact subset M of K. Assume further that T is a uniformly asymptotically regular with respect to S and that

TnX +

Sy in K for all x,yeK and

n 1,2,.... If(I T S)(K)is

closed,

thenT

+

Shasafixedpointin K.

PROOF. Definea map Unasin theproofof Theorem 2.1. Proceedingas inTheorem2.1, K and Ln satisfy all hypotheses of Theorem

C,

where Ln is as in the proof of Theorem 2.1.

By

Theorem

C,

Ln has a fixed point, say, xnin K. Since (I-T-S)(K) is

closed,

it follows from

(2.8)

that0 (I-T-S)(K).

Hence

theproofiscomplete.

THEOREM 2.6. Let K be a nonempty complete bounded convex subset ofX. Let T be a nonexpansive mapping ofK into X.

Suppose

thatS isacontinuousmapping ofK into Xsuch that S(K) is contained in a compact subset M ofK and Tz+Sy.Kfor all z,V K. If(I-T-S)(K)is closed,thenT

+

Shasafixed pointin K.

PROOF.

Define a map Hn as in the proofof Theorem 2.2. Proceeding as in the proofof Theorem2.2 and using TheoremCinsteadofTychonoff’sTheorem

A,

weobtainasequence

{zn}

in K such thatzn

An(Tz

n

+

Szn).

Since,nlasn--*oandK is

bounded,

itfollows that

(I-T-S)zn-O

asn-o.

Since(I-T-S)(K)isclosed,itfollows that0 (I-T-$)(K).

(6)

686 P. VIJAYARAJU

Hencetheproofis complete.

Thefollowing exampleshowsthatif theconditionTr.

+

SVin Kfor allz,vEKof Theorem 2.6is dropped, then theconclusionoftheorem fails.

EXAMPLE

2.7.

Let

X

2

and K {xeX:[Ix < 1}. Define a map T from K to K by

Tz

(0,1,2

for all eK. ThenT is anisometry andhencenonexpansive.

Defineamap Sfrom KtoKbySy=(1-

[1!112,

0

)forallveK.

Then S iscompact and henceS is continuous $(K) iscontainedin acompactsubset ofK.

Suppose

thata (1/2,0 ),b (0 eK. Thenwehave Ta

+

S’b 2

+

(I/4) 5/4.

ThereforeTa

+

Sb

.

It"for somea, 6K.

Suppose

thatzisafixed point ofT

+

Sin K. Then

x (T

+

S)z (1

2,{1,{

2 ).

Therefore {n 2forn 1,2 But

oo{n

0. Thus

moo{n

1-

=

2and hence z 1,

Therefore (1 2 (0 and so

=

0 which contradicts x

z-

Thus T

+

$ has no fixedpointinK.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.

would liketo thank Professor

T.R.

Dhanapalan forhis guidance and encouragementin the preparation of this paper.

REFERENCES

1.

BONSALL, F.F., Lectures

onsomefixedpoint theorems of functional analysis,

Tara

Institute, Bombay,

Indk,

1962.

2.

CAIN,

G.L.

(JR.) & NASHED, M.Z.,

Fixed points and stability forasumof twooperatorsin locallyconvexspaces, Pacific

J.

Math. 39

(1971),

581-592.

3.

DUNFORD,

N.

& SCHWARTZ, J.T.,

Linear

Operator, Part I,

General Theory Interscience Publishers,

INC, New

York, 1958.

4.

EDMUNDS, D.E.,

Remarksonnonlinearfunctional equations, Math.

Ann.

174

(1967),

233-239.

5.

GOEBEL, K. & KIRK, W.A., A

fixed point theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings,

Proc. Amer.

Math.

Soc.

35

(1972),

171-174.

6.

KRASNOSELSKII, M.A.,

Tworemarkson the method ofsuccessive approximations,Uspehi Math. Nauk. 10

(1955),

123-127.

7.

NASHED, M.A. & WONG, J.S.W.,

Somevariantsofafixed point theorem Krasnoselskii and applicationstononlinearintegralequations,

J.

Math. Mech. 18

(1969),

767-777.

8.

REINERMANN, J.,

Fixpunkts.tzevomKrasnoselskii-Typ.,Math. Z. 119

(1971),

339-344.

9.

SEHGAL, V.M. & SINGH, S.P., A

fixed point theorem for thesumof two mappings, Math.

Japonica 23

(1978),

71-75.

10.

TYCHONOFF, A.,

EinFixpunkts.tz, Math.

Ann.

111

(1935),

767-776.

11.

VIJAYARAJU, P.,

Fixed point theorems for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, Bull.

CalcuttaMath.

Soc.

80

(1988),

133-136.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Chi-kin, Strong and ∆-convergence for mixed type total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in CAT(0) spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 122 (2013), 16 pages. Chan, Iterative

In this paper, we prove the weak and strong convergence of an explicit iterative process to a common fixed point of an asymptotically quasi-I -nonexpansive mapping T and

Xu, Strong convergence of modified Mann iterations for asymptotically non- expansive mappings and semigroups, Nonlinear Analysis 64 (2006), no.. Xu, Demiclosedness principle

THEOREM 4.1 Let X be a non-empty convex subset of the locally convex Hausdorff topological vector space E, T an upper hemicontinuous mapping of X into 2 E’, T(x) is a non-empty

Using the relative fixed point index of compact reducible mappings in [1], we give in this paper conditions for a mapping to be globally injective whenever the mapping is

It has been shown that if C is a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a uni- formly convex Banach space X, then every nonexpansive mapping T : C → C has a fixed point (see [2])..

In this section, using Theorem 2.1, we obtain some strong convergence results for a class T mapping, a quasi-nonexpansive mapping and a nonexpansive mapping in a Hilbert space..

They proved the strong convergence of the iterative sequence {x n }, where f is a contraction mapping and {T n } is a uniformly asymptotically regular sequence of nonexpansive