インド哲学仏教学研究 26(201803) 005張 文良「鳳潭の『大乗起信論議記幻虎録』について ： その思想史の位置づけを中心に」
10
0
0
全文
(2) 1630–1682 1704 1723. 1652–1739 1673–1690. 2. 549–560 639–661 2. 1964 1990. 1 T45, 481a. - 48 -.
(3) 3. 4. 711–782. 960–1028. 1682. 5. 3. 3 T73, 370b. 4. 155–170. 2000. 2012 5. 1. 43. 71b. - 49 -.
(4) - 50 -.
(5) 6. 6. 1 L141, 86a. - 51 -.
(6) - 52 -.
(7) 7. 8. 9. 7. T44, 247c. 8. 30 T35, 726a–b. 9. T46, 783a. - 53 -.
(8) 10. 965–1038. 11. 10. 16 T35, 405c–406a. 11. 302. 1922. - 54 -.
(9) 67. 12. L T Keywords. 12. 177. - 55 -. 1996.
(10) On Fengtan’s Reading of the Fazang-Zongmi Connection concerning Awakening of Faith in the Mahayana ZHANG, Wen Liang With the establishment of the official Huayan —Fazang. —Chengguan. —Zongmi. lineage (Dushun. —Zhiyan. ) in earlier Song Dynasty 960–1279 , there was. a tendency in China and Japan to assume strong consistency and continuity between Zongmi’s and Chengguan’s ideas and those of Fazang—the defacto first patriarch of Huayan. One example is that people tended to wittingly or unwittingly attribute ideas in Zongmi’s Commentary on Fazang’s Commentary on the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna to Fazang himself. However, the Japanese Huayan scholar Fengtan’s (1659–1738) discovery of Fazang’s Commentary on the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna and Fengtan’s commentary on it, interpreted the transition from Fazang to Zongmi to be a process of deviation from Fazang’s teachings—whereas Fazang generally viewed Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna as inferior to the Huayan Sutra. , Zongmi raised the former to a status equal to that of the latter and thus. blurred the distinction between Mahāyāna Ultimate Teachings and Perfect Teachings. Fengtan made several serious criticisms of Zongmi’s alleged distortions of Fazang’s teachings, and argued for a return to Fazang’s orthodox treatment of the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna. While acknowledging Fengtan’s contribution to the Huayan commentarial tradition—he detected some discontinuities between Fazang and Zongmi (for example, Fazang stressed the essential identity of “Dharma nature” and “Buddha nature” whereas Zongmi, following Chengguan, emphasized the difference between the two concepts), I argue that his criticisms of Zongmi are largely off the mark. First, there is clear evidence that Fazang sees Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna to be almost as important as Huayan Sutra. Secondly, although Fengtan’s criticism of Zongmi and defense of Fazang may have been intended to be faithful to Fazang, they have actually and unfortunately missed the logical development from Fazang to Zongmi. Logically and historically, there was good reason for Zongmi to raise the status of Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna within the Huayan system, as it would greatly encourage practitioners’ faith in the Mahāyāna, and accordingly in Huayan.. - 61 -.
(11)
関連したドキュメント
Hilbert’s 12th problem conjectures that one might be able to generate all abelian extensions of a given algebraic number field in a way that would generalize the so-called theorem
The calibration problem for the Black-Scholes model was solved based on the S&P500 data, and the S&P 500 call and put option price data were interpreted in the framework
An easy-to-use procedure is presented for improving the ε-constraint method for computing the efficient frontier of the portfolio selection problem endowed with additional cardinality
First, the theory characterizes the category of sets and mappings as an abstract category in the sense that any model for the axioms which satisfies the additional (non-elementary)
Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A
We study the classical invariant theory of the B´ ezoutiant R(A, B) of a pair of binary forms A, B.. We also describe a ‘generic reduc- tion formula’ which recovers B from R(A, B)
In addition, we prove a (quasi-compact) base change theorem for rigid etale cohomology and a comparison theorem comparing rigid and algebraic etale cohomology of algebraic
A bounded linear operator T ∈ L(X ) on a Banach space X is said to satisfy Browder’s theorem if two important spectra, originating from Fredholm theory, the Browder spectrum and
