The Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
The JapanesePsychonomic Society
TheJlmpaneseJburnatofltsychonomicScience
2ee3, Vel.22,>Jo.1,39-4D
Prizewinner's
Summary2-A-03
Attention
in
depth
modulatesspatial
perception
A
comparison
between
depth
perception
and
distance
perceptioni)
Takahiko
KiMuRA*'
** andToshiaki
MiuRA**
ISAS
Resear=h Fellow,*Osaha
LbeiversiC),**
We conducted two experiments to
investigate
the relation between attention andperceptual
processing, Itisknown that
"distance
perception" isbased on egocentric processing, and that"depth
perception" isbased on exocentric processing. Many researchcrs havc examjned various
aspccts of spatial perception
in
3-D
space.However
there
arefew
studies about therelationshipsbetween attention and
distance
ordepth
perception.
In thisstudy we examined how attentionoperates when depth and distance perceptionsare required. We controlled theexpectancy of the
locationof targetby using
the
validity ofaprecue,The
results revealedthat
thereis
arelationshipbetween attention and depth perception. However a relationship
between
attention and distanceperceptionwas not apparent.
The
resultsindicated
thatthe allocation of attention might changeaccording tothe
demands
of thetask.Key words: attention, three-dimensional space,
depth
perception,distance
perception, expectancy
Generally
attention and perceptual processinghave been examined independently and
conse-quently therelation between
these
two
factors
has
been considered inonly a
few
studies.The
sameis
true for three-dimensional
(3-D)
space re$earch,Al-though there
has
been research intodepthpercep-tionor distanceperception,there has been little
con-tributien
of attentionin
modcls ofdepth
perceptionor
distance
perception.
Kawabata
(1986>
however, has reported thatwhenparticipantsattended
to
a specific edge when theyobservecl a Necker cube
(which
is
an ambiguousfigureL the plane which
included
the emphasisededge was
judged
tobe
nearer than any other plane.Inaddition, Kimura and Miura
<2001)
suggested thatdepth
perception wasinfiuenced
by
attentionin
3-D
space, that is,an expectancy of a targetislocationmade depth perception more accurate. These
find-ings indicatethat attention
has
somekind
ef effecton depth perception.
Depth
perception issaid tooperate inanexocen-tricrnode, whereas distance perception operates in
- This study was supported by grants from
the
JSPS
and the Socicty forthe Support of OsakaUniversity,
** Dcpartment of
Applied
Cognitive
Psychology,
Graduate
School
ofHuman
Sciences,
Osaka
versity, 1-2
Yamadaoka,
Suita,
Osaka
565-0871an egocentric mode, How then,are there any
dif-ferences between the effects of attention on
depth
perception,and the effects of attention on
distance
perception? In the present study we used a spatial
cueing paradigm
(e.g.
Posner,Nissen&
Ogden,
1978)so that the validity of expectancy could be
con-trolled.This procedure seemed appropriate
for
anexarnination of the relations
between
attentionin
3-D
space and distanceand attention in3-D space anddepth perception,
Methods
Participants Twelve volunteers participated in
Experiment 1and Experiment
2.
Apparatus
andStimulus
Three
pairs ofLEDs,
each consisting of a red LED and a green LED, wereused as fixationpoints,and werc also presented as
precues
for
targetlocations,
The
redLEDs
were usedas targets,
The
distances
from
an observer to thefixation
points were 140cm, 240cm, and 340cm.Two near, and two far,targetswere located around
each fixationpoint,The
distances
from
an observertoeach of the targets
(Figure
la)
were123
cm, 128cm,
152
cm, 165 cm, 192 cm, 219 cm, 290 cm, 315 cm,365 cm, and 415cm.
Procedure
In
Experiment
1,
observers were asked tomake a simplecletection
by pressing aThe Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
The JapanesePsychonomic Society
40 The
Japanese
Journal
of Psychonomic Science VoL 22,No. 1(a)
FixationlCPrecue)(t40cm)Fi:]tion2(Precue)(Z4Dcm)F=etion3{Precue)(34bpmp iaa o.sge"W<Z.aetsg,.ii (ae=ZEo.ssE o:(b)
DmsTANCE JUDGEMENTFigure 1.
(a)
The apparatusin
thisstudy(see
textfor
details)
depth
perception,and reaction time,when the validity of thton as soon as possibleand to
judge
thedepth,
in
centimeters,
from
afixation
point to a target.In
Experiment
2
the task was $ame as thatin
Experi-ment1except thattheobservers were asked to
judge
the
distance
from
themselves toa targetinstead
ofthedcpth
from
a fixationpoint toa target.The time course of a
trial
wasthe
same inboth
experiments, and 1,OOOms after thebeginnjng
of atriala precue was presented
for
a randomduration
betwecn
3,OOOms to4,OOOms, An observer'satten-tionwas directedtoa particularregion of depth by a
precue,and the target appeared inthatregion
{Va]id)
in
44,4%
of a:ltrials.On
theotherhand,
atargetwaspresented inan opposite region to the precue
(In-valid) in 22.2% of
the
tria]s.
A control(NcutraD
condition
{33.3%
of all trials)did notinclude
anyinformation
about a target location, At the sametime thatthe prccue disappeared one of the targets
appeared either nearer to a fixationpoint or further away.
Results
andDiscussion
Attention
amddepth
perceptionThe
magnitude ofdepth
perception was more accurate at a nearfixation
point than at a fixationpoint which wasfurther away
[F(2,22)=14.64,
P<.OOOI],
Further-more, although not significant, theresults
indicated
a tendencyfor
observers to more adequatelyjudge
depth
(P<,06)
when a valid cue was presented. Theobserver's reaction time
in
Experiment
1
indicated
that the effects ofa cue were apparent at
fixation
2,and thattherewas a tendency forthe reaction time
to belonger at a near fixationpoint than at a more
350 -vel;dperception) Zirrvelidlperoeption) Npmnetrtt-tperception)
eob2'
i:]xe/elwhcRn
B
+neutreicRn,g
1zsog
lo
oDEPTH.
{b)
The accuracy of distanceperception,
e precue was controlled.
distant
fixation
point. Thus when depthperception
was
demanded,
attention would have an a]]ocatedgradient.
Attention and distance perception Regardless of
the
distance
of thefixation
points, the magnitude ofthe distanceperception was adequate and theeffect
of va]idity wa$ not significant
(P<.6376}.
This
indi-cated that attentiondid
nothave
an effect ondis-tance
perceptlon.
A comparison between depth and
distance
per-ception Figure lb revealed that distance was
judged
more accurately thandepth
([F(1,22)=9.47,
p<.O055]; see
bars
in
Figure
lb).
The
resultsindj-cated therefere,that there was a differenceinthe a]location of attention
in
3-D
space when observersjudged
a distance in an egocentric rnode or whenthey
judged
depth inan exocentric mode. Further-more, the increa$ed reaction tirnefer
depth
percep-tion,relative to that for
distance
perception,indi-cates that the allocation of attention might change
dcpending on the taskdemand.
References
Kawabata,
N.
1986
Attention
and depth perception,
Pt,rcePtion,
15,
563-572.
Kimura, T,,
&
Miura,
T,2001
The
relationbetween
attention in three-dimensional space and depth
perception:
An
investigation
in terms of
tancy,
The
fopanese
lburnal
of
Psychonomic
ence, 20,37-38(in
Japanese
with abstract in
lish).Posner,
M. I.Nissen, M.
J.
& Ogden, W.C.
1978tended and unattended processing modes: The role
of set
for
spatiallocation,
In H,L,Pick and E.J,