• 検索結果がありません。

of Mixed Monotone Operators

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "of Mixed Monotone Operators"

Copied!
8
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Volume 2011, Article ID 563136,8pages doi:10.1155/2011/563136

Research Article

On Fixed Point Theorems

of Mixed Monotone Operators

Xinsheng Du and Zengqin Zhao

School of Mathematics Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, Shandong 273165, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xinsheng Du,[email protected] Received 11 November 2010; Accepted 4 January 2011

Academic Editor: T. Benavides

Copyrightq2011 X. Du and Z. Zhao. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

We obtain some new existence and uniqueness theorems of positive fixed point of mixed monotone operators in Banach spaces partially ordered by a cone. Some results are new even for increasing or decreasing operators.

1. Introduction

Mixed monotone operators were introduced by Guo and Lakshmikantham in 1 in 1987.

Thereafter many authors have investigated these kinds of operators in Banach spaces and obtained a lot of interesting and important results. They are used extensively in nonlinear differential and integral equations. In this paper, we obtain some new existence and uniqueness theorems of positive fixed point of mixed monotone operators in Banach spaces partially ordered by a cone. Some results are new even for increasing or decreasing operators.

Let the real Banach spaceE be partially ordered by a coneP of E, that is, xy if and only if yxP. A : P × PP is said to be a mixed monotone operator if Ax, y is increasing in x and decreasing in y, that is, ui, vi i 1,2 ∈ P, u1u2, v1v2 implies Au1, v1Au2, v2. Element xP is called a fixed point of A if Ax, x x.

Recall that cone P is said to be solid if the interiorP is nonempty, and we denote x0 ifxP. P is normal if there exists a positive constantNsuch that 0≤xyimplies x ≤Ny,Nis called the normal constant ofP.

For all x, yE, the notation xy means that there exist λ > 0 and μ > 0 such thatλxyμx. Clearly,∼is an equivalence relation. Givenh > θ i.e.,hθ andh /θ,

(2)

we denote byPh the setPh {x ∈ E | xh}. It is easy to see that PhP is convex and λPhPhfor allλ >0. IfP / ∅andhP, it is clear thatPhP.

All the concepts discussed above can be found in2,3. For more facts about mixed monotone operators and other related concepts, the reader could refer to4–9and some of the references therein.

2. Main Results

In this section, we present our main results. To begin with, we give the definition ofτ-ϕ- concave-convex operators.

Definition 2.1. LetEbe a real Banach space andPa cone inE. We say an operatorA:P×PP isτ-ϕ-concave-convex operator if there exist two positive-valued functionsτt, ϕt on intervala, bsuch that

H1τt:a, b → 0,1is a surjection, H2ϕt> τt, for allt∈a, b,

H3tx,1/τty≥ϕtAx, y, for allt∈a, b,x, yP.

Theorem 2.2. LetP be normal cone ofE, and letA :P ×PP be a mixed monotone andτ-ϕ- concave-convex operator. In addition, suppose that there existsh > θsuch thatAh, hPh, thenA has exactly one fixed pointxinPh. Moreover, constructing successively the sequence

xnA

xn−1, yn−1

, ynA

yn−1, xn−1

, n1,2, . . . , 2.1

for any initialx0, y0Ph, one has

xnx −→0, ynx−→0, n−→ ∞. 2.2

Proof. We divide the proof into 3 steps.

Step 1. We prove thatAhas a fixed point inPh.

SinceAh, hPh, we can choose a sufficiently small numbere0∈0,1such that

e0hAh, h≤ 1

e0h. 2.3

It follows fromH1that there existst0∈a, bsuch thatτt0 e0, and hence

τt0h≤Ah, h≤ 1

τt0h. 2.4

(3)

ByH2, we know thatϕt0/τt0>1. So, we can take a positive integerksuch that ϕt0

τt0 k

≥ 1

τt0. 2.5

It is clear that

τt0 ϕt0

k

τt0. 2.6

Letu0 τt0kh, v0 1/τt0kh. Evidently,u0, v0Phandu0 τt02kv0 < v0. By the mixed monotonicity ofA, we haveAu0, v0Av0, u0. Further, combining the condition H3with2.4and2.6, we have

Au0, v0 A

τt0kh, 1 τt0kh

A

τt0τt0k−1h, 1 τt0

1 τt0k−1h

ϕt0A

τt0k−1h, 1 τt0k−1h

≥ · · ·

ϕt0k

Ah, hϕt0k

τt0h

≥τt0khu0.

2.7

Fort∈a, b, fromH3, we get

A x, y

A

τt 1 τtx, 1

τtτty

ϕtA 1

τtx, τty

, 2.8

and hence

A 1

τtx, τty

≤ 1 ϕtA

x, y

, ∀t∈a, b, x, y∈P. 2.9

(4)

Thus, we have

Av0, u0 A 1

τt0kh,τt0kh

A 1

τt0 1

τt0k−1h, τt0τt0k−1h

≤ 1 ϕt0A

1

τt0k−1h,τt0k−1h

≤ · · ·

≤ 1

ϕt0kAh, h≤ 1

ϕt0k · 1 τt0h

≤ 1

τt0khv0.

2.10

Construct successively the sequences

unAun−1, vn−1, vnAvn−1, un−1, n1,2, . . . . 2.11

It follows from2.7,2.10, and the mixed monotonicity ofAthat

u0u1≤ · · · ≤un≤ · · · ≤vn≤ · · · ≤v1v0. 2.12

Note thatu0 τt02kv0, so we can getunu0≥τt02kv0≥τt02kvn,n1,2, . . .. Let rnsup{r >0|unrvn}, n1,2, . . . . 2.13

Thus, we haveunrnvn, n1,2, . . ., and then

un 1unrnvnrnvn 1, n1,2, . . . . 2.14

Therefore, rn 1rn, that is,{rn}is increasing with{rn} ⊂ 0,1. Suppose that rnr as n → ∞, thenr 1. Indeed, suppose to the contrary that 0 < r < 1. ByH1, there exists t1∈a, bsuch thatτt1 r. We distinguish two cases.

Case 1. There exists an integerNsuch thatRNr. In this case, we know thatrnrfor all nN. So, fornN, we have

un 1Aun, vnA

rnvn, 1 rnun

A

τt1vn, 1 τt1un

ϕt1vn 1. 2.15

By the definition ofrn, we getrn 1 rϕt1> τt1 r, which is a contradiction.

(5)

Case 2. If for all integern,rn < r, then 0< rn/r <1. ByH1, there existssn ∈a, bsuch thatτsn rn/r. So, we have

un 1Aun, vnA

rnvn, 1 rnun

A

rn

rrvn,r rn

1 run

A

τsnrvn, 1 τsn

1 run

ϕsnA

rvn, 1 run

ϕsnϕt1vn 1.

2.16

By the definition ofrn, we have

rn 1ϕsnϕt1τsnϕt1 rn

rϕt1. 2.17

Letn → ∞, we getrϕt1> τt1 r, which is also a contradiction. Thus, limn→ ∞rn1.

For any natural numberp, we have

θun punvnun≤1−rnv0,

θvn pvnvnun≤1−rnv0. 2.18

SinceP is normal, we have

un punN1rnv0 asn → ∞,

vn pvnN1rnv0 asn → ∞. 2.19 Here,Nis the normality constant.

So,{un}and{vn}are Cauchy sequences. BecauseEis complete, there existu, vsuch thatunu, vnvn → ∞. By2.12, we know thatunuvvnand

θvu≤1−rnv0. 2.20

Further,

vuN1rnv0 n → ∞, 2.21

and thusuv. Letx:uv, we obtain

un 1Aun, vnAx, xAvn, un vn 1. 2.22

Letn → ∞, we getxAx, x. That is,xis a fixed point ofAinPh.

(6)

Step 2. We prove thatxis the unique fixed point ofAinPh.

In fact, suppose thatxis a fixed point ofAinPh. Sincex, xPh, there exist positive numbersβ > α > 0 such that αxxβx. Let e1 sup{e > 0 | 1/ex ≥ xex}.

Evidently,e1 ∈ 0,1. We now prove thate1 1. If otherwise, 0< e1 < 1. FromH1, there existst2∈a, bsuch thatτt2 e1. Then,

xAx, xA

e1x, 1 e1x

A

τt2x, 1 τt2x

ϕt2Ax, x ϕt2x.

xAx, xA 1

e1x, e1x

A 1

τt2x, τt2x

≤ 1

ϕt2Ax, x 1 ϕt2x.

2.23

Sinceϕt2 > τt2 e1, this contradicts the definition of e1. Hence,e1 1, thus,x x.

Therefore,Ahas a unique fixed pointxinPh. Step 3. We prove2.2.

For anyx0, y0Ph, we can choose a small numbere2∈0,1such that e2hx0≤ 1

e2h, e2hy0≤ 1

e2h. 2.24

Also fromH1, there ist3∈a, bsuch thatτt3 e2, and hence τt3h≤x0≤ 1

τt3h, τt3h≤y0≤ 1

τt3h. 2.25

We can choose a sufficiently large integerm, such that ϕt3

τt3 m

≥ 1

τt3. 2.26

Let u0 τt3mh, v0 1/τt3mh. It is easy to see that u0, v0Ph and u0x0v0, u0y0v0. Putun Aun−1, vn−1,vn Avn−1, un−1,xn Axn−1, yn−1, yn Ayn−1, xn−1,n 1,2, . . .. Similarly toStep 1, it follows that there existsyPh such that Ay, y y, limn→ ∞un limn→ ∞vn y. By the uniqueness of fixed points of operatorAinPh, we gety x. And by induction,unxnvn, unynvn, n1,2. . ..

SinceP is normal, we have limn→ ∞xnx, limn→ ∞ynx.

3. Concerned Remarks and Corollaries

If we suppose that the operatorA:Ph×PhPhorA:P ×PP withP is a solid cone, thenAh, hPhis automatically satisfied. This proves the following corollaries.

(7)

Corollary 3.1. LetP be a normal cone ofE, and letA : Ph×PhPh be a mixed monotone and τ-ϕ-concave-convex operator, thenAhas exactly one fixed pointx in Ph. Moreover, constructing successively the sequence

xnA

xn−1, yn−1

, ynA

yn−1, xn−1

, n1,2, . . . , 3.1

for any initialx0, y0Ph, one has

xnx −→0, ynx−→0, n−→ ∞. 3.2

Corollary 3.2. LetP be a normal solid cone ofE, and letA : P ×PP be a mixed monotone andτ-ϕ-concave-convex operator, thenAhas exactly one fixed pointxinP. Moreover, constructing successively the sequence

xnA

xn−1, yn−1

, ynA

yn−1, xn−1

, n1,2, . . . , 3.3

for any initialx0, y0P, one has

xnx −→0, ynx−→0, n−→ ∞. 3.4 Whenτt t,ϕt tαt, 0 < αt < 1, 0 < t < 1, the conditions H1and H2are automatically satisfied. So, one has

Corollary 3.3. LetPbe a normal cone of a real Banach spaceE, h > θ. A:Ph×PhPhis a mixed monotone operator. In addition, suppose that for all 0< t <1, there exists 0< αt<1 such that

A

tx,1 ty

tαtA x, y

, ∀x, y∈Ph, 0< t <1, 3.5

thenAhas exactly one fixed pointxinPh. Moreover, constructing successively the sequence xnA

xn−1, yn−1

, ynA

yn−1, xn−1

, n1,2, . . . , 3.6

for any initialx0, y0Ph, one has

xnx −→0, ynx−→0, n−→ ∞. 3.7

Remark 3.4. Corollary 3.3is the main result in5. So, our results generalized the result in5.

Whenτt t, ϕt tβ,0 < t < 1, the conditionsH1and H2are automatically satisfied. So, we have the following.

(8)

Corollary 3.5. LetPbe normal solid cone ofE, and letA:P×PP be a mixed monotone operator.

In addition, suppose that there exists 0< β <1 such that A

tx,1

ty

tβA x, y

, ∀x, y∈P,˙ 0< t <1, 3.8

thenAhas exactly one fixed pointxinP. Moreover, constructing successively the sequence xnA

xn−1, yn−1

, ynA

yn−1, xn−1

, n1,2, . . . , 3.9

for any initialx0, y0P, one has

xnx −→0, ynx−→0, n−→ ∞. 3.10 Remark 3.6. Corollary 3.5is the main result in4. So, our results generalized the result in4.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China nos.

10871116, 11001151, the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Provinceno. Q2008A03, the Doctoral Program Foundation of Education Ministry of Chinano. 20103705120002, and the Youth Foundation of Qufu Normal Universitynos. XJ200910, XJ03003.

References

1 D. J. Guo and V. Lakshmikantham, “Coupled fixed points of nonlinear operators with applications,”

Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 623–632, 1987.

2 D. J. Guo and V. Lakshmikantham, Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones, vol. 5 of Notes and Reports in Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1988.

3 D. Guo, Nonlinear Functional Analysis, Shandong Scientific Technical, Jinan, China, 2000.

4 D. J. Guo, “Fixed points of mixed monotone operators with applications,” Applicable Analysis, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 215–224, 1988.

5 Y. Wu and Z. Liang, “Existence and uniqueness of fixed points for mixed monotone operators with applications,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1913–1924, 2006.

6 Z. Zhao, “Existence and uniqueness of fixed points for some mixed monotone operators,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1481–1490, 2010.

7 Z. Zhang and K. Wang, “On fixed point theorems of mixed monotone operators and applications,”

Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 3279–3284, 2009.

8 Y. Wu, “New fixed point theorems and applications of mixed monotone operator,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 341, no. 2, pp. 883–893, 2008.

9 K. Deimling, Nonlinear Functional Analysis, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1985.

参照

関連したドキュメント

In this note, we prove the existence of maximal, minimal, greatest and least α -fuzzy fixed points for α -fuzzy monotone multifunctions.. When α = 1, the element x is called a

In this paper, we discuss some results on the existence and uniqueness of coupled fixed points in metric spaces endowed with a reflexive relation and some applications to

Zhao, “Existence of positive solutions for nonlinear third-order three- point boundary value problems,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications, vol..

[2] , Metric and generalized projection operators in Banach spaces: Properties and applica- tions, Theory and Applications of Nonlinear Operators of Accretive and Monotone Type

Here, we use the theory of nonlinear monotone operators to prove the existence of weak solutions for the following nonlinear systems involving several p-Laplacian operators

Ma, “Coupled fixed points for mixed monotone condensing operators and an existence theorem of the solutions for a class of functional equations arising in dynamic programming,”

Svaiter, A practical optimality condition without constraint qualifications for nonlinear programming, J. Rockafellar, On the maximality of sums of nonlinear

Perturbations of maximal monotone operators applied to the nonlinear Schr\&#34;odinger and1.