Vol. 23, No. 11 (2000) 753–758 S0161171200003562
© Hindawi Publishing Corp.
ON CHARACTERIZATIONS OF A CENTER GALOIS EXTENSION
GEORGE SZETO and LIANYONG XUE (Received 16 June 1999)
Abstract.LetBbe a ring with 1,Cthe center ofB,Ga finite automorphism group ofB, andBGthe set of elements inBfixed under each element inG. Then, it is shown thatBis a center Galois extension ofBG(that is,Cis a Galois algebra overCGwith Galois group G|CG) if and only if the ideal ofBgenerated by{c−g(c)|c∈C}isBfor eachg≠1 in G. This generalizes the well known characterization of a commutative Galois extensionC thatCis a Galois extension ofCGwith Galois groupGif and only if the ideal generated by {c−g(c)|c∈C}isCfor eachg≠1 inG. Some more characterizations of a center Galois extensionBare also given.
Keywords and phrases. Galois extensions, center Galois extensions, central extensions, Ga- lois central extensions, Azumaya algebras, separable extensions,H-separable extensions.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 16S30, 16W20.
1. Introduction. LetCbe a commutative ring with 1,Ga finite automorphism group ofCandCGthe set of elements inCfixed under each element inG. It is well known that a commutative Galois extensionC is characterized in terms of the ideals generated by{c−g(c)|c∈C}forg≠1 inG, that isCis a Galois extension with Galois groupG if and only if the ideal generated by{c−g(c)|c∈C}isC for eachg≠1 inG(see [3, Proposition 1.2, page 80]). A natural generalization of a commutative Galois extension is the notion of a center Galois extension, that is, a noncommutative ringBwith a finite automorphism groupGand centerCis called a center Galois extension ofBG with Galois groupGifC is a Galois extension ofCG with Galois group G|C G. Ikehata (see [4, 5]) characterized a center Galois extension with a cyclic Galois group G of prime order in terms of a skew polynomial ring. Then, the present authors generalized the Ikehata characterization to center Galois extensions with Galois groupG of any cyclic order [7] and to center Galois extensions with any finite Galois groupG [8].
The purpose of the present paper is to generalize the above characterization of a commutative Galois extension to a center Galois extension. We shall show thatBis a center Galois extension ofBGif and only if the ideal ofBgenerated by{c−g(c)|c∈C}
isBfor each g≠1 in G. A center Galois extensionBis also equivalent to each of the following statements:
(i) Bis a Galois central extension ofBG, that is,B=BGCwhich isG-Galois extension ofBG.
(ii) Bis a Galois extension ofBGwith a Galois system{bi∈B, ci∈C, i=1,2,...,m}
for some integerm.
(iii) the ideal of the subringBGC generated by{c−g(c)|c∈C}isBGC for each g≠1 inG.
2. Definitions and notations. Throughout this paper,Bwill represent a ring with 1,G= {g1=1, g2,...,gn}an automorphism group ofBof ordernfor some integer n,Cthe center ofB, BGthe set of elements inBfixed under each element inG, and B∗Ga skew group ring in which the multiplication is given bygb=g(b)gforb∈ Bandg∈G.
Bis called aG-Galois extension ofBGif there exist elements{ai,bi∈B, i=1,2,...,m}
for some integermsuch thatm
i=1aig(bi)=δ1,g. Such a set{ai,bi}is called aG-Galois system forB.Bis called a center Galois extension ofBG ifCis a Galois algebra over CGwith Galois groupG|CG.Bis called a central extension ofBGifB=BGC, andB is called a Galois central extension ofBGifB=BGCis a Galois extension ofBGwith Galois groupG.
Let A be a subring of a ring B with the same identity 1. We denote VB(A) the commutator subring of Ain B. We callB a separable extension of Aif there exist {ai,bi∈B, i=1,2,...,mfor some integerm}such that
aibi=1,and
bai⊗bi= ai⊗bibfor allb∈Bwhere⊗is overA.Bis calledH-separable extension ofAif B⊗ABis isomorphic to a direct summand of a finite direct sum ofBas aB-bimodule.
Bis called centrally projective overAifBis a direct summand of a finite direct sum ofAas aA-bimodule.
3. The characterizations. In this section, we denoteJj(C)= {c−gj(c)|c∈C}. We shall show thatBis a center Galois extension ofBGif and only ifB=BJj(C), the ideal ofBgenerated byJj(C),for eachgj≠1 inG. Some more characterizations of a center Galois extensionBare also given. We begin with a lemma.
Lemma3.1. IfB=BJj(C)for eachgj≠1inG(that is,j≠1), then
(1)Bis a Galois extension ofBGwith Galois groupGand a Galois system{bi∈B;ci∈ C, i=1,2,...,m}for some integerm.
(2)Bis a centrally projective overBG. (3)B∗GisH-separable overB.
(4)VB∗G(B)=C.
Proof. (1) SinceB =BJj(C) for each j ≠1, there exist
b(j)i ∈B, ci(j) ∈C, i= 1,2,...,mj
for some integermj, j=2,3,...,nsuch thatmj i=1bi(j)
ci(j)−gj ci(j)
=1.
Therefore, mj
i=1b(j)i ci(j) =1+mj i=1b(j)i gj
c(j)i
. Letb(j)mj+1= −mj i=1b(j)i gj
ci(j) and cm(j)j+1=1. Thenmj+1
i=1 b(j)i ci(j)=1 andmj+1 i=1 b(j)i gj
ci(j)
=0. Letbi2,i3,...,in=b(2)i2 bi(3)3
···b(n)in andci2,i3,...,in=c(2)i2 ci(3)3 ...ci(n)n forij=1,2,...,mj+1 andj=2,3,...,n. Then
m2+1 i2=1
m3+1 i3=1
···
mn+1 in=1
bi2,i3,...,inci2,i3,...,in=
m2+1 i2=1
m3+1 i3=1
···
mn+1 in=1
bi(2)2 b(3)i3 ···bi(n)n c(2)i2 ci(3)3 ···c(n)in
=
m2+1 i2=1
m3+1 i3=1
···
mn+1 in=1
b(2)i2 ci(2)2 b(3)i3 c(3)i3 ···b(n)in ci(n)n
=
m2+1 i2=1
b(2)i2 c(2)i2
m3+1 i3=1
b(3)i3 c(3)i3 ···
mn+1 in=1
bi(n)n ci(n)n =1 (3.1)
and for eachj≠1
m2+1 i2=1
m3+1 i3=1
···
mn+1 in=1
bi2,i3,...,ingj(ci2,i3,...,in)
=
m2+1 i2=1
m3+1 i3=1
···
mn+1 in=1
bi(2)2 b(3)i3 ···bi(n)n gj
c(2)i2 ci(3)3 ···ci(n)n
=
m2+1 i2=1
m3+1 i3=1
···
mn+1 in=1
bi(2)2 b(3)i3 ···bi(n)n gj
c(2)i2 gj
ci(3)3
···gj
ci(n)n
=
m2+1 i2=1
m3+1 i3=1
···
mn+1 in=1
bi(2)2 gj
ci(2)2 bi(3)3 gj
ci(3)3
···b(n)in gj
ci(n)n
=
m2+1 i2=1
b(2)i2 gj
c(2)i2 m3+1
i3=1
b(3)i3 gj
c(3)i3
···
mn+1 in=1
b(n)in gj
ci(n)n
=0.
(3.2)
Thus,{bi2,i3,...,in∈B; ci2,i3,...,in∈C, ij=1,2,...,mj+1 andj=2,3,...,n}is a Galois system forB. This complete the proof of (1).
(2) By (1),B is a Galois extension ofBG with a Galois system {bi∈B, ci∈C, i= 1,2,...,m}for some integerm. Letfi:B→BGgiven byfi(b)=n
j=1gj(cib)for allb∈ B, i=1,2,...,m. Then it is easy to check thatfiis a homomorphism asBG-bimodule and b=m
i=1bicib =n
j=1m
i=1bigj(ci)gj(b)=m
i=1bin
j=1gj(cib)=m
i=1bifi(b) for allb∈B. Hence{bi;fi, i=1,2,...,m}is a dual bases forBasBG-bimodule, and so Bis finitely generated and projective asBG-bimodule. Therefore,Bis a direct summand of a finite direct sum ofBGas aBG-bimodule. ThusBis centrally projective overBG.
(3) By (1),Bis a Galois extension ofBGwith Galois groupG. HenceB∗GHomBG(B, B)[2, Theorem 1]. By (2),Bis centrally projective overBG. Thus,B∗G(HomBG(B,B)) isH-separable overB[6, Proposition 11].
(4) We first claim thatVB∗G(C)=B. Clearly,B⊂VB∗G(C). Letn
j=1bjgjin VB∗G(C) for somebj∈B. Thenc(n
j=1bjgj)=(n
j=1bjgj)cfor eachc∈ C, socbj=bjgj(c), that is,bj(c−gj(c))=0 for eachgj∈Gandc∈C. SinceB=BJj(C)for eachgj≠1, there existb(j)i ∈B andci(j)∈C, i=1,2,...,msuch thatm
i=1b(j)i
ci(j)−gj ci(j)
= 1. Hence bj=m
i=1b(j)i
ci(j)−gj ci(j)
bj=m
i=1bi(j)bj
ci(j)−gj ci(j)
=0 for each gj≠1. This implies thatn
j=1bjgj=b1∈B. HenceVB∗G(C)⊆B, and soVB∗G(C)=B.
Therefore,VB∗G(B)⊂VB∗G(C)=B. ThusVB∗G(B)=VB(B)=C.
We now show some characterizations of a center Galois extensionB.
Theorem3.2. The following statements are equivalent.
(1)Bis a center Galois extension ofBG. (2)B=BJj(C)for eachgj≠1inG.
(3)Bis a Galois extension ofBGwith a Galois system{bi∈B, ci∈C, i=1,2,...,m}
for some integerm.
(4)Bis a Galois central extension ofBG. (5)BGC=BGCJj(C)for eachgj≠1inG.
Proof. (1)⇒(2). By hypothesis,C is a Galois extension ofCG with Galois group G|C G. HenceC=CJj(C)for eachgj≠1 in G[3, Proposition 1.2, page 80]. Thus, B=BJj(C)for eachgj≠1 inG.
(2)⇒(1). SinceB=BJjCfor eachgj≠1 inG, B∗GisH-separable overBby Lemma 3.1(3) and VB∗G(B)=C by Lemma 3.1(4). Thus C is a Galois extension ofCG with Galois groupG|CGby [1, Proposition 4].
(1)⇒(3). This is Lemma 3.1(1).
(3)⇒(1). SinceBis Galois extension ofBGwith a Galois system{bi∈B, ci∈C, i= 1,2,...,m}for some integerm, we havem
i=1bigj(ci)=δ1,g. Hencem
i=1bi(ci−gj(ci))
=1 for eachgj≠1in G. So for everyb∈B,b=m
i=1bbi(ci−gj(ci))∈BJ(C)j . There- fore,B=BJi(C)for each gi≠1in G. Thus,B is a center Galois extension ofBG by (2)⇒(1).
(1)⇒(4). SinceCis a Galois algebra with Galois groupG|CG,BandBGCare Galois extensions ofBGwith Galois groupG|BGCG. Noting thatBGC⊂B, we haveB=BGC, that is,Bis a central extension ofBG. ButBis a Galois extension ofBG, soBis a Galois central extension ofBG.
(4)⇒(1). By hypothesis,B=BGC is a Galois extension ofBG. Hence there exists a Galois system{ai;bi∈B, i=1,2,...,m}for some integermsuch thatm
i=1aigj(bi)= δ1,j. ButB=BGC, soai=nai
k=1b(aki)c(aki)andbi=nbi
l=1bl(bi)cl(bi)for somea(aki), b(bl i) inBGandck(ai), c(bl i)in C, k=1,2...,nai, l=1,2,...,nbi, i=1,2,...,m. Therefore,
δ1,j= m i=1
aigj(bi)= m i=1
nai
k=1
b(aki)ck(ai)gj nbi
l=1
b(bl i)cl(bi)
= m i=1
nai
k=1
bk(ai)ck(ai)
nbi
l=1
bbligj
c(bl i)
= m i=1
nai
k=1 nbi
l=1
b(aki)ck(ai)b(bl i) gj
cl(bi) .
(3.3)
This shows that
bk,l(ai,bi)=b(aki)ck(ai)bl(bi)∈B; ck,l(ai,bi)=cl(bi)∈C, k=1,2,...,nai, l= 1,2,...,nbi, i=1,2,...,m
is a Galois system forB. Thus,Bis a center Galois extension ofBGby (3)⇒(1).
(1)⇒(5). SinceBis a center Galois extension ofBG,B=BJ(C)j for eachgj≠1 inG by (1)⇒(2) andB=BGCby (1)⇒(4). Thus, BGC=BGCJ(C)j for eachgj≠1 inG.
(5)⇒(1). SinceBGC=BGCJj(C)for eachgj≠1 inG,B=BJj(C)for eachgj≠1 inG.
Thus,Bis a center Galois extension ofBGby (2)⇒(1).
The characterization of a commutative Galois extensionC in terms of the ideals generated by {c−g(c)| c ∈C} for g ≠1 in G is an immediate consequence of Theorem 3.2.
Corollary3.3. A commutative ringC is a Galois extension ofCG if and only if C=CJj(C), the ideal generated by{c−gj(c)|c∈C}isCfor eachgj≠1inG.
Proof. LetB=Cin Theorem 3.2. Then, the corollary is an immediate consequence of Theorem 3.2(2).
By Theorem 3.2, we derive several characterizations of a Galois centeral extensionB.
Corollary3.4. IfBis a central extension ofBG(that is,B=BGC), then the following statements are equivalent.
(1)Bis a Galois extension ofBG. (2)Bis a center Galois extension ofBG. (3)B∗GisH-separable overB.
(4)B=CJj(B)for eachgj≠1inG.
(5)B=BJj(B)for eachgj≠1inG.
Proof. (1)⇐⇒(2). This is given by (1)⇐⇒(4) in Theorem 3.2.
(2)⇒(3). This is Lemma 3.1(3).
(3)⇒(1). SinceB∗GisH-separable overB,Bis a Galois extension ofBG[1, Propo- sition 2].
SinceB=BGCby hypothesis, it is easy to see thatJj(B)=BGJj(C)for eachgjinG. Thus, B=CJj(B), B=BJ(B)j , andB=BJj(C)are equivalent. This implies that (2)⇐⇒(4)⇐⇒(5) by Theorem 3.2(2).
We call a ringBthe DeMeyer-Kanzaki Galois extension ofBGifBis an AzumayaC- algebra andBis a center Galois extension ofBG(for more about the DeMeyer-Kanzaki Galois extensions, see [2]). Clearly, the class of center Galois extensions is broader than the class of the DeMeyer-Kanzaki Galois extensions. We conclude the present paper with two examples. (1) The DeMeyer-Kanzaki Galois extension ofBG and (2) a center Galois extension ofBG, but not the DeMeyer-Kanzaki Galois extension ofBG.
Example3.5. LetCbe the field of complex numbers, that is, C=R+R√
−1 where Ris the field of real numbers,B=C[i,j,k]the quaternion algebra overC, andG= {1,g|g(c1+cii+cjj+ckk)=g(c1)+g(ci)i+g(cj)j+g(ck)kfor eachb=c1+cii+
cjj+ckk∈C[i,j,k]andg(u+v√
−1)=u−v√
−1 for eachc=u+v√
−1∈C}. Then (1) The center ofBisC.
(2)Bis an AzumayaC-algebra.
(3)Cis a Galois extension ofCG with Galois groupG|CGand a Galois system {a1=1/√
2, a2=(1/√ 2)√
−1; b1=1/√
2, b2= −(1/√ 2)√
−1}.
(4)Bis the DeMeyer-Kanzaki Galois extension ofBGby (2) and (3).
(5)BG=R[i,j,k].
(6)B=BGC, soBis a centeral extension ofBG. (7)J(C)g =R√
−1.
(8)B=BJg(C)since 1= −√
−1√
−1∈BJg(C). (9)J(B)g =R√
−1+R√
−1i+R√
−1j+R√
−1k.
(10)B=CJg(B).
Example3.6. By replacing in Example 3.5 the field of complex numbers Cwith the ringC=Z⊕ZwhereZis the ring of integers,g(a,b)=(b,a)for all(a,b)∈C, andG= {1,g|g(c1+cii+cjj+ckk)=g(c1)+g(ci)i+g(cj)j+g(ck)kfor eachb= c1+cii+cjj+ckk∈B=C[i,j,k]}. Then
(1) The center ofBisC.
(2)C is a Galois extension ofCG with Galois groupG|C G and a Galois system {a1=(1,0), a2=(0,1); b1=(1,0), b2=(0,1)}.
(3)Bis not an AzumayaC-algebra (for 1/2∉C), and soBis not the DeMeyer-Kanzaki Galois extension ofBG.
(4)CG= {(a,a)|a∈Z} Z.
(5)BG=CG[i,j,k].
(6)B=BGC, soBis a central extension ofBG. (7)J(C)g = {(a,−a)|a∈Z} =Z(1,−1).
(8)B=BJg(C)since 1=(1,1)=(1,−1)(1,−1)∈BJG(C). (9)J(B)g =Z(1,−1)+Z(1,−1)i+Z(1,−1)j+Z(1,−1)k.
(10)B=CJg(B).
References
[1] R. Alfaro and G. Szeto,The centralizer onH-separable skew group rings, Rings, exten- sions, and cohomology (Evanston, IL, 1993) (New York), Dekker, 1994, pp. 1–7.
MR 95g:16027. Zbl 812.16038.
[2] F. R. DeMeyer,Some notes on the general Galois theory of rings, Osaka J. Math.2(1965), 117–127. MR 32#128. Zbl 143.05602.
[3] F. R. DeMeyer and E. Ingraham,Separable Algebras over Commutative Rings, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1971. MR 43#6199. Zbl 215.36602.
[4] S. Ikehata,OnH-separable polynomials of prime degree, Math. J. Okayama Univ.33(1991), 21–26. MR 93g:16043. Zbl 788.16022.
[5] S. Ikehata and G. Szeto,OnH-skew polynomial rings and Galois extensions, Rings, exten- sions, and cohomology (Evanston, IL, 1993) (New York), Dekker, 1994, pp. 113–121.
MR 95j:16033. Zbl 815.16009.
[6] K. Sugano,Note on separability of endomorphism rings, J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Ser. I 21(1970/71), 196–208. MR 45#3465. Zbl 236.16003.
[7] G. Szeto and L. Xue,On the Ikehata theorem forH-separable skew polynomial rings, Math.
J. Okayama Univ.40(1998), 27–32, 2000.
[8] ,The general Ikehata theorem forH-separable crossed products, Internat. J. Math.
Math. Sci., Vol 25, to appear, 1999.
Szeto: Department of Mathematics, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois61625, USA E-mail address:[email protected]
Xue: Department of Mathematics, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois61625, USA E-mail address:[email protected]