• 検索結果がありません。

topic8a Recent site activity Vu, Tuan Khai's personal website

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "topic8a Recent site activity Vu, Tuan Khai's personal website"

Copied!
52
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

N. Gregory Mankiw N. Gregory Mankiw

PowerPoint

PowerPoint®®Slides by Ron CronovichSlides by Ron Cronovich Modified by the instructor

Modified by the instructor

MACROECONOMICS MACROECONOMICS

Topic 8

Aggregate Demand I:

Building the IS-LM Model

(Chapter 10)

Instructor: Tuan Khai Vu

ICU, Winter Term 2011

Principles of Macroeconomics

(2)

Learning objectives

Learning objectives

In this chapter, we will learn :

ƒ

the IS curve, and its relation to:

ƒ

the Keynesian cross

ƒ

the loanable funds model

ƒ

the LM curve, and its relation to:

ƒ

the theory of liquidity preference

ƒ

how the IS-LM model determines income and the interest rate in the short run when P is fixed

(3)

Context

ƒ

Chapter 9 introduced the model of aggregate demand and aggregate supply.

ƒ

Long run

ƒ

prices flexible

ƒ

output determined by factors of production & technology

ƒ

unemployment equals its natural rate

ƒ

Short run

ƒ

prices fixed

ƒ

output determined by aggregate demand

(4)

Context

ƒ

This chapter develops the IS-LM model, the basis of the aggregate demand curve.

ƒ

We focus on the short run and assume the price level is fixed (so, SRAS curve is horizontal).

ƒ

This chapter (and chapter 11) focus on the closed-economy case.

(5)

I nvestment - A quick review

ƒ

Includes:

ƒ

Business fixed investment

Spending on plant and equipment

ƒ

Residential fixed investment

Spending by consumers and landlords on housing units

ƒ

Inventory investment

The change in the value of all firms’ inventories

(6)

The Keynesian Cross

ƒ

A simple closed economy model in which income is determined by expenditure (or

aggregate demand) (due to J.M. Keynes) .

ƒ

Behavior of firms in this model:

ƒ

cannot change prices so must

forecast demand to determine supply.

ƒ

if demand forecasted actual demand Î unplanned inventories occur

ƒ

firms adjust their production based on changes in unplanned inventories:

unplanned inventories Î production

This is the underlying adjustment mechanism that Keynes thought captures reality.

(7)

The Keynesian Cross

ƒ

Notation:

I = planned investment

PE = C + I + G = planned expenditure Y = real GDP = actual expenditure

ƒ

The relationship btw actual & planned investment

The amount that firms would like to invest

actual investment

planned investment

unplanned inventory investment

= +

(8)

The Keynesian Cross

ƒ

Î The relationship btw actual & planned expenditure

actual expenditure

planned expenditure

unplanned inventory investment

= +

(9)

Elements of the Keynesian Cross

consumption function: govt policy variables:

for now, assume planned investment is exogenous: planned expenditure:

equilibrium condition:

actual expenditure = planned expenditure

If Y PE Æ unplanned inventories 0 Æ firms change production Æ not equilibrium.

(10)

G ra p h in g p la n n e d e x p e n d it u re

income, output,Y

PE planned expenditure PE=C+I+G MPC 1 10

(11)

Graphing the equilibrium condition

income, output, Y PE

planned expenditure

PE = Y

45º

(12)

The equilibrium value of income

income, output, Y PE

planned expenditure

PE = Y

PE = C + I + G

Equilibrium

The goods market is in equilibrium at this point

Y0

(13)

Adjustment tow ards equilibrium

income, output, Y PE

planned expenditure

PE = Y

PE = C + I + G

Y1

unplanned inventories < 0 (Å PE > actual exp. Y) Îfirms increase output

ÎY moves tw Y0

unplanned inventories > 0 (Å PE < actual exp. Y) Îfirms reduce output

Î Y moves tw Y0

Y0 Y2

(14)

An increase in government purchases

( G1ÆG2)

Y PE

PE

=Y

PE = C + I + G1

PE1 = Y1

PE = C + I + G2

PE2 = Y2 ΔY

At Y1,

there is now an unplanned drop in inventory…

…so firms

increase output, and income rises toward a new

equilibrium.

ΔG

(15)

The government purchases multiplier - -

Solving for Δ Y

equilibrium condition in changes

because I exogenous

I=0

because ΔC = MPC Y

Collect terms with ΔY on the left side of the equals sign:

Solve for ΔY :

(16)

The government purchases multiplier

Definition: the increase in income resulting from a

$1 increase in G.

In this model, the govt

purchases multiplier equals

Example: If MPC = 0.8, then

An increase in G causes income to

increase 5 times as much!

(17)

Why the multiplier is greater than 1

ƒ

Initially, the increase in G causes an equal increase in Y: ΔY = ΔG.

ƒ

But Y C

further Y

further C

further Y

ƒ

So the final impact on income is much bigger than the initial ΔG.

This is called the multiplier process.

(18)

An increase in taxes

Y PE

PE

=Y

PE = C2 + I + G

PE2 = Y2

PE = C1 + I + G

PE1 = Y1 ΔY

At Y1, there is now an unplanned

inventory buildup…

…so firms

reduce output, and income falls toward a new equilibrium

ΔC = MPC ΔT

Initially, the tax increase reduces consumption, and therefore PE:

(19)

The tax multiplier - - Solving for Y

eq’m condition in changes

I and G exogenous

Solving for ΔY :

Final result:

(20)

The tax multiplier

definition: the change in income resulting from a $1 increase in T :

If MPC = 0.8, then the tax multiplier equals

(21)

The tax multiplier

…is negative:

A tax increase reduces C, which reduces income.

…is greater than one

(in absolute value) suppose MPC>.5:

A change in taxes has a multiplier effect on income.

…is smaller than the govt spending multiplier:

Consumers save the fraction (1 – MPC) of a tax cut, so the initial boost in spending from a tax cut is

(22)

NOW YOU TRY:

Practice w ith the Keynesian Cross

ƒ

Use a graph of the Keynesian cross

to show the effects of an increase in planned investment on the equilibrium level of

income/output.

(23)

The I S curve

definition: a graph of all combinations of r and Y that result in goods market equilibrium

i.e. actual expenditure (output)

= planned expenditure The equation for the IS curve is:

(24)

Deriving the I S curve

Y2 Y1

Y2

Y1 Y

PE

r

Y

PE = C + I (r1 )+ G PE = C + I (r2 )+ G

r1 r2

PE = Y

I S ΔI

r I

PE

Y

(25)

Why the I S curve is negatively sloped

ƒ

A fall in the interest rate motivates firms to

increase investment spending, which drives up total planned spending (PE ).

ƒ

To restore equilibrium in the goods market, output (or actual expenditure, Y )

must increase.

(26)

The I S curve and the loanable funds model

(a) The L.F. model (b) The IS curve

S, I r

I (r ) r1

r2

r

Y1 Y r1

r2

Y2 S1

S2

I S

(27)

Fiscal Policy and the I S curve

ƒ

We can use the IS-LM model to see how fiscal policy (G and T ) affects aggregate demand and output.

ƒ

Let’s start by using the Keynesian cross

to see how fiscal policy shifts the IS curve…

(28)

Shifting the I S curve: ΔG

Y2 Y1

Y2 Y1

At any value of r,

G PE

Y

Y PE

r

Y

PE = C + I (r1 )+ G1 PE = C + I (r1 )+ G2

r1

PE = Y

I S1 The horizontal

distance of the IS shift equals

I S2

…so the IS curve shifts to the right.

ΔY

(29)

NOW YOU TRY:

Shifting the I S curve: Δ T

ƒ Use the diagram of the Keynesian cross or

loanable funds model to show how an

increase in taxes shifts the IS curve.

(30)

The Theory of Liquidity Preference

ƒ

Due to John Maynard Keynes.

ƒ

A simple theory in which the interest rate is determined by money supply and

money demand.

(31)

Money supply

The supply of real money balances is fixed:

M/ P

real money

r

interest rate

(32)

Money demand

Demand for real money balances:

M/ P

real money balances

r

interest rate

L(r )

decreasing in r (see topic 3)

(33)

Equilibrium

The interest rate adjusts to equate the supply and demand for money:

M/ P

real money

r

interest rate

L(r ) r1

The money market is in equilibrium at this point.

(34)

How the Fed raises the interest rate

M/ P

real money balances

r

interest rate

L(r ) r1

r2 To increase r,

Fed reduces M

(35)

CASE STUDY:

Monetary Tightening & I nterest Rates

ƒ

Late 1970s:

π

> 10%

ƒ

Oct 1979: Fed Chairman Paul Volcker announces that monetary policy

would aim to reduce inflation

ƒ

Aug 1979-April 1980: Fed reduces M/P 8.0%

ƒ

Jan 1983:

π

= 3.7%

How do you think this policy change

(36)

Monetary Tightening & I nterest Rates, cont.

Δi < 0 Δi > 0

8/1979: i = 10.4% 8/1979: i = 10.4%

flexible sticky

Quantity theory, Fisher effect

(Classical)

Liquidity preference

(Keynesian)

prediction actual

The effects of a monetary tightening on nominal interest rates

prices model

long run short run

(37)

The LM curve

Now let’s put Y back into the money demand function:

The LM curve is a graph of all combinations of r and Y that equate the supply and demand for real money balances.

The equation for the LM curve is:

(38)

D e ri v in g t h e L M c u rv e

M/P

r L(r,Y 1)

r 1

r 2

r Y Y 1

r 1L(r,Y 2)

r 2 Y 2

LM

(a)The market for real money balances(b)The LMcurve 38

(39)

Why the LM curve is upw ard sloping

ƒ

An increase in income raises money demand.

ƒ

Since the supply of real balances is fixed, there is now excess demand in the money market at the initial interest rate.

ƒ

The interest rate must rise to restore equilibrium in the money market.

(40)

H o w Δ M s h if ts t h e L M c u rv e

M/P r L(r,Y 1)r 1

r 2

r Y Y 1

r 1

r 2

LM 1

(a)The market for real money balances(b)The LMcurve LM 2 40

(41)

NOW YOU TRY:

Shifting the LM curve

ƒ

Suppose a wave of credit card fraud causes consumers to use cash more frequently in transactions.

ƒ

Use the liquidity preference model to show how these events shift the LM curve.

(42)

The short- run equilibrium

The short-run equilibrium is the combination of r and Y that simultaneously satisfies the equilibrium conditions in the goods & money markets:

Y r

I S LM

Equilibrium interest

rate

Equilibrium level of

income

The macro- economy is in equilibrium at this point.

(43)

The Big Picture

Keynesian Cross

Theory of Liquidity Preference

IS curve

LM curve

IS-LM model

Agg. demand

curve Agg. supply

Model of Agg. Demand and Agg.

Supply

Explanation of short-run fluctuations

The trip we have been taken so far, and will continue next week

(44)

Preview of Chapter 11

In Chapter 11, we will

ƒ

use the IS-LM model to analyze the impact of policies and shocks.

ƒ

learn how the aggregate demand curve comes from IS-LM.

ƒ

use the IS-LM and AD-AS models together to analyze the short-run and long-run effects of shocks.

ƒ

use our models to learn about the Great Depression.

(45)

Chapter Summary

Chapter Summary

1. Keynesian cross

ƒ basic model of income determination

ƒ takes fiscal policy & investment as exogenous

ƒ fiscal policy has a multiplier effect on income 2. IS curve

ƒ comes from Keynesian cross when planned investment depends negatively on interest rate

ƒ shows all combinations of r and Y

that equate planned expenditure with actual expenditure on goods & services

(46)

Chapter Summary

Chapter Summary

3. Theory of Liquidity Preference

ƒ basic model of interest rate determination

ƒ takes money supply & price level as exogenous

ƒ an increase in the money supply lowers the interest rate

4. LM curve

ƒ comes from liquidity preference theory when money demand depends positively on income

ƒ shows all combinations of r and Y that equate demand for real money balances with supply

(47)

Chapter Summary

Chapter Summary

5. IS-LM model

ƒ Intersection of IS and LM curves shows the unique point (Y, r ) that satisfies equilibrium in both the goods and money markets.

(48)

Practicing:

Solving end- of- the- chapter problems

ƒ

Let’s solve problem 2

ƒ

Recall the equations describing the model

(49)

Elements of the Keynesian Cross

slide #9 reshown

consumption function: govt policy variables:

for now, assume planned investment is exogenous: planned expenditure:

equilibrium condition:

actual expenditure = planned expenditure

(50)

2. a&b. PE line & equilibrium

consumption function:

for now, assume planned investment is exogenous: planned expenditure:

equilibrium condition: govt policy variables:

C=200+0.75(Y-T) =200+0.75(Y-100)

=0.75Y +200-75 = 0.75Y +125 T =G=100

I =100

PE = C+I+G = (0.75Y+125)+100 +100 PE = 0.75Y+325

Y = PE Î Y = 0.75Y+325 Î 0.25Y = 325 Î Y = 325/0.25 or Y=1300

substitute values assigned

This indicates that the graph of PE is a

straight line with the slope = 0.75 and intercept = 325.

(51)

2. c. G = 100 Æ 125

consumption function:

for now, assume planned investment is exogenous: planned expenditure:

equilibrium condition: govt policy variables:

C=200+0.75(Y-T) =200+0.75(Y-100)

=0.75Y +200-75 = 0.75Y +125 T =100, G=125

I =100

PE = C+I+G = (0.75Y+125)+100 +125 PE = 0.75Y+350

Y = PE Î Y = 0.75Y+350 Î 0.25Y = 350 Î Y = 350/0.25 or Y=1400

(52)

2. d. G = ? if Y= 1600

planned expenditure: equilibrium condition:

PE = C+I+G = (0.75Y+125)+100 +G PE = 0.75Y+225+G

Y = PE Î Y = 0.75Y+225+G

Î G = 0.25Y - 225 = 0.25*1600 – 225 = 400 - 225 Î G =175

参照

関連したドキュメント

We also describe applications of this theorem in the study of the distribution of the signs in elliptic nets and generating elliptic nets using the denominators of the

In the second computation, we use a fine equidistant grid within the isotropic borehole region and an optimal grid coarsening in the x direction in the outer, anisotropic,

Keywords: continuous time random walk, Brownian motion, collision time, skew Young tableaux, tandem queue.. AMS 2000 Subject Classification: Primary:

In this paper, we focus on the existence and some properties of disease-free and endemic equilibrium points of a SVEIRS model subject to an eventual constant regular vaccination

Kilbas; Conditions of the existence of a classical solution of a Cauchy type problem for the diffusion equation with the Riemann-Liouville partial derivative, Differential Equations,

Analogs of this theorem were proved by Roitberg for nonregular elliptic boundary- value problems and for general elliptic systems of differential equations, the mod- ified scale of

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

Correspondingly, the limiting sequence of metric spaces has a surpris- ingly simple description as a collection of random real trees (given below) in which certain pairs of