• 検索結果がありません。

Weighted Composition Operators from Generalized Weighted Bergman Spaces to Weighted-Type Spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Weighted Composition Operators from Generalized Weighted Bergman Spaces to Weighted-Type Spaces"

Copied!
14
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Volume 2008, Article ID 619525,14pages doi:10.1155/2008/619525

Research Article

Weighted Composition Operators from Generalized Weighted Bergman Spaces to Weighted-Type Spaces

Dinggui Gu

Department of Mathematics, JiaYing University, Meizhou, GuangDong 514015, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Dinggui Gu,[email protected]

Received 3 November 2008; Revised 22 November 2008; Accepted 24 November 2008 Recommended by Kunquan Lan

Letϕbe a holomorphic self-map and let ψ be a holomorphic function on the unit ballB. The boundedness and compactness of the weighted composition operatorψCϕfrom the generalized weighted Bergman space into a class of weighted-type spaces are studied in this paper.

Copyrightq2008 Dinggui Gu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

LetBbe the unit ball ofCnand letHBbe the space of all holomorphic functions onB. For fHB, let

Rfz n

j1

zj

∂f

∂zjz 1.1

represent the radial derivative offHB. We writeRmfRRm−1f.

For anyp >0 andα∈R, letNbe the smallest nonnegative integer such thatpNα >

−1. The generalized weighted Bergman spaceApαis defined as follows:

Apα

fHB| fApα f0

B

RNfzp

1− |z|2pNα

dvz 1/p<

. 1.2

Heredvis the normalized Lebesgue measure ofBi.e.,vB 1. The generalized weighted Bergman space Apα is introduced by Zhao and Zhu see, e.g., 1. This space covers the

(2)

classicalweighted Bergman spaceα > −1, the Besov spaceAp−n1, and the Hardy space H2. See1,2for some basic facts on the weighted Bergman space.

Letμbe a positive continuous function on0,1. We say thatμis normal if there exist positive numbersαandβ, 0< α < β,andδ∈0,1such thatsee3

μr

1−rα is decreasing on δ,1, lim

r1

μr 1−rα 0;

μr

1−rβ is increasing onδ,1, lim

r1

μr 1−rβ ∞.

1.3

AnfHBis said to belong to the weighted-type space, denoted byHμHμB, if

fHμ sup

z∈B μ

|z|fz<∞, 1.4

whereμis normal on0,1. The little weighted-type space, denoted byHμ,0, is the subspace ofHμconsisting of thosefHμsuch that

|z| →lim1μ

|z|fz0. 1.5

See4,5for more information onHμ.

Let ϕ be a holomorphic self-map of B. The composition operator Cϕ is defined as follows:

Cϕf

z f◦ϕz, fHB. 1.6

LetψHB. ForfHB, the weighted composition operatorψCϕis defined by ψCϕf

z ψzf ϕz

, zB. 1.7

The book6contains a plenty of information on the composition operator and the weighted composition operator.

In the setting of the unit ball, Zhu studied the boundedness and compactness of the weighted composition operator between Bergman-type spaces and H in 7. Some extensions of these results can be found in 8. Some necessary and sufficient conditions for the weighted composition operator to be bounded or compact between the Bloch space andHare given in 9. In the setting of the unit polydisk, some necessary and sufficient conditions for a weighted composition operator to be bounded and compact between the Bloch space andHare given in10,11 see also12for the case of composition operators.

In13, Zhu studied the boundedness and compactness of the Volterra composition operators from generalized weighted Bergman space toμ-Bloch-type space. Other related results can be found, for example, in4,5,14–22.

(3)

In this paper, we study the weighted composition operatorψCϕ from the generalized weighted Bergman space to the spaces Hμ and Hμ,0. Some necessary and sufficient conditions for the weighted composition operator ψCϕ to be bounded and compact are given.

Throughout the paper, constants are denoted byC, they are positive and may differ from one occurrence to the other.

2. Main results and proofs

Before we formulate our main results, we state several auxiliary results which will be used in the proofs. They are incorporated in the lemmas which follow.

Lemma 2.1see1. iSuppose thatp >0 andαn1>0. Then there exists a constantC >0 such that

fz≤ CfApα

1− |z|2nα1/p 2.1

for allfApαandzB.

iiSuppose thatp >0 andαn1<0 or 0< p1 andαn10. Then every function inApαis continuous on the closed unit ball. Moreover, there is a positive constantCsuch that

fCfAp

−n1, 2.2

for everyfAp−n1.

iiiSuppose thatp >1, 1/p1/q1,andαn10. Then there exists a constantC >0 such that

fz≤C

ln e 1− |z|2

1/q 2.3

for allfApαandzB.

The following criterion for compactness of weighted composition operators follows from standard arguments similar to those outlined in6, Proposition 3.11 see also12, proof of Lemma 2. We omit the details of the proof.

Lemma 2.2. Assume thatψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ :ApαHμ is compact if and only ifψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded and for any bounded sequencefkk∈NinApα which converges to zero uniformly on compact subsets ofBas k → ∞, one hasψCϕfkHμ0 ask → ∞.

Note that whenp > 0 andαn1<0, the functions inApαare Lipschitz continuous see1, Theorem 66. By Lemma 2.1and Arzela-Ascoli theorem, similarly to 19, proof of Lemma 3.6, we have the following result.

(4)

Lemma 2.3. Letp >0 andαn1<0. Letfkbe a bounded sequence inApαwhich converges to 0 uniformly on compact subsets ofB, then

klim→ ∞sup

z∈B

fkz0. 2.4

The following lemma is from21 one-dimensional case is20, Lemma 2.1.

Lemma 2.4. Assume thatμis a normal function on0,1. A closed setKinHμ,0 is compact if and only if it is bounded and satisfies

|z| →lim1sup

f∈Kμ

|z|fz0. 2.5

We will consider three cases:n1α >0,n1α0,andn1α <0.

2.1. Casen1α >0

Theorem 2.5. Assume thatp > 0,αis a real number such thatnα1 > 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded if and only if

M:sup

z∈B

μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p <∞. 2.6

Proof. Assume thatψCϕ:ApαHμis bounded. Let

t > nmax

1,1 p

α1

p . 2.7

ForaB, set

faz

1− |a|2t−n1α/p

1− z, a t . 2.8

It follows from1, Theorem 32thatfaApαand supa∈BfaApα <∞.Hence CψCϕ

Apα→HμψCϕfϕb

Hμ

sup

z∈Bμ

|z|ψCϕfϕb z

μ

|b|ψb 1−ϕb2n1α/p,

2.9

from which we get2.6.

(5)

Conversely, suppose that 2.6 holds. Then for arbitrary zB and fApα, by Lemma 2.1we have

μ

|z|ψCϕf

zμ

|z|f

ϕzψzCfApα μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p. 2.10

In light of condition2.6, the boundedness of the operatorψCϕ : ApαHμfollows from 2.10by taking the supremum overB. This proof is completed.

Theorem 2.6. Assume thatp > 0,αis a real number such thatnα1 > 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ:ApαHμis compact if and only ifψHμand

|ϕz| →1lim μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p 0. 2.11

Proof. Assume thatψCϕ :ApαHμis compact, thenψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded. Taking fz≡1, we get thatψHμ. Letzkk∈Nbe a sequence inBsuch that|ϕzk| → 1 ask → ∞ if such a sequence does not exist that condition2.11is vacuously satisfied. Set

fkz

1−ϕ

zk2t−nα1/p

1− z, ϕ

zk

t , k∈N, 2.12

wheretsatisfies2.7. From1, Theorem 32, we see thatfkk∈Nis a bounded sequence in Apα. Moreover, it is easy to see thatfkconverges to zero uniformly on compact subsects ofB.

ByLemma 2.2, lim supk→ ∞ψCϕfkHμ 0.On the other hand, we have ψCϕfk

Hμ sup

z∈B μ

|z|ψCϕfk

z| ≥ μzkψ zk 1−ϕ

zk2n1α/p. 2.13

Hence

lim sup

k→ ∞

μzkψ zk 1−ϕ

zk2n1α/p 0, 2.14

from which2.11follows.

Conversely, assume thatψHμand2.11holds. Then, it is easy to check that2.6 holds. HenceψCϕ : ApαHμis bounded. According to2.11, for givenε > 0, there is a constantδ∈0,1such that

sup

{z∈B:δ<|ϕz|<1}

μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p < ε. 2.15

(6)

Letfkk∈Nbe a bounded sequence inApαsuch thatfk → 0 uniformly on compact subsets of Bask → ∞. LetδD{w∈B:|w| ≤δ}. From2.15andψHμ, we have

ψCϕfk

Hμ sup

z∈B μ

|z|fk

ϕz ψz

sup

{z∈B:|ϕz|≤δ} sup

{z∈B:δ<|ϕz|<1}

μ

|z|ψzfk

ϕz

ψHμ sup

w∈δD

fkwCfk

Apα sup

{z∈B:δ<|ϕz|<1}

μ

|z|ψz 1−ϕz2n1α/p

≤ ψHμ sup

w∈δD

fkwCε.

2.16

SinceδDis a compact subset ofB, we have limk→ ∞supw∈δD|fkw| 0. Using this fact and lettingk → ∞in2.16, we obtain

lim sup

k→ ∞

ψCϕfk

HμCε. 2.17

Sinceεis an arbitrary positive number, we obtain lim supk→ ∞ψCϕfkHμ 0.ByLemma 2.2, the implication follows.

Theorem 2.7. Assume thatp > 0,αis a real number such thatnα1 > 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ:ApαHμ,0 is bounded if and only ifψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded andψHμ,0.

Proof. Assume thatψCϕ : ApαHμ,0 is bounded. Then it is clear thatψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded. Takingfz 1 and employing the boundedness ofψCϕ :ApαHμ,0, we see that ψHμ,0.

Conversely, assume thatψCϕ : ApαHμ is bounded andψHμ,0. Suppose that fApαwithfApαL, using polynomial approximations we obtainsee, e.g.,1

|z| →lim1

1− |z|2n1α/pfz0. 2.18

From the above equality andψHμ,0, we have that for everyε > 0, there exists aδ ∈0,1 such that whenδ <|z|<1,

1− |z|2n1α/pfz< ε

M, 2.19

μ

|z|ψz< ε

1−δ2n1α/p

L , 2.20

(7)

whereMis defined in2.6. Therefore, ifδ <|z|<1 andδ <|ϕz|<1, from2.6and2.19 we have

μ

|z|ψCϕf

z μ

|z|ψz 1−ϕz2n1α/p

1−ϕz2n1α/pf

ϕz

M

1−ϕz2n1α/pf

ϕz< ε.

2.21

Ifδ <|z|<1 and|ϕz| ≤δ, usingLemma 2.1and2.20we have

μ

|z|ψCϕf

z μ

|z|ψz 1−ϕz2n1α/p

1−ϕz2n1α/pf

ϕz

CfApα μ

|z|ψz 1−ϕz2n1α/p

CfApα 1−δ2

n1α/pμ

|z|ψz< ε.

2.22

Combining2.21and2.22, we obtain thatψCϕfHμ,0. Sincef is an arbitrary element of Apαwe see that

ψCϕ

Apα

Hμ,0, 2.23

which, along with the boundedness ofψCϕ :ApαHμ, implies the result.

Theorem 2.8. Assume thatp > 0,αis a real number such thatnα1 > 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ:ApαHμ,0 is compact if and only if

|z| →lim1

μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p 0. 2.24

Proof. Assume that2.24holds. For anyfApαwithfApα ≤1, by2.10we have

μ

|z|ψCϕf

z≤CfApα μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p. 2.25

(8)

Using2.24, we get

|z| →lim1 sup

fAp

α≤1μ

|z|ψCϕf

z≤C lim

|z| →1

μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p 0. 2.26

From this andLemma 2.4, we see thatψCϕ :ApαHμ,0 is compact.

Conversely, assume that ψCϕ : ApαHμ,0 is compact. ThenψCϕ : ApαHμ,0 is bounded andψCϕ :ApαHμis compact. By Theorems2.6and2.7, we obtain

|ϕz| →1lim μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p 0, 2.27

|z| →1lim μ

|z|ψz0. 2.28

Ifϕ<1, it holds that

|z| →lim1

μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p ≤ 1

1− ϕ2n1α/p lim

|z| →1μ

|z|ψz0, 2.29

from which the result follows in this case.

Hence, assume thatϕ1. In terms of2.27, for everyε >0, there exists aδ∈0,1, such that whenδ <|ϕz|<1,

μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p < ε. 2.30

According to2.28, for the aboveε, there exists anr∈0,1, such that whenr <|z|<1, μ

|z|ψz< ε

1−δ2n1α/p

. 2.31

Therefore, whenr <|z|<1 andδ <|ϕz|<1, we have that μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p < ε. 2.32

Ifr <|z|<1 and|ϕz| ≤δ, we obtain μ

|z|ψz

1−ϕz2n1α/p ≤ 1

1−δ2n1α/pμ

|z|ψz< ε. 2.33

Combining2.32with2.33we get2.24, as desired.

(9)

2.2. Casen1α0

Theorem 2.9. Assume thatp > 1,αis a real number such thatnα1 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded if and only if

M1:sup

z∈Bμ

|z|ψz

ln e

1−ϕz2 1−1/p

<∞. 2.34

Proof. Assume that2.34holds. Then for arbitraryzBandfApα, byLemma 2.1we have μ

|z|ψCϕf

zμ

|z|f

ϕzψz

CfApαμ

|z|ψz

ln e

1−ϕz2 1−1/p

. 2.35

From2.34and2.35, the boundedness ofψCϕ :ApαHμfollows.

Now assume thatψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded. ForaB, set

faz

ln e 1− |a|2

−1/p

ln e

1− z, a

. 2.36

By using2, Theorem 1.12, we easily check thatfaAp−n1. Therefore, CψCϕ

ApαHμψCϕfϕb

Hμ

sup

z∈B μ

|z|ψCϕfϕb z

μ

|b|ψb

ln e

1−ϕb2 1−1/p

.

2.37

From the last inequality, we get the desired result.

Theorem 2.10. Assume thatp >1,αis a real number such thatnα1 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ:ApαHμis compact if and only ifψHμand

|ϕz| →lim 1μ

|z|ψz

ln e

1−ϕz2 1−1/p

0. 2.38

Proof. First assume that2.38holds andψHμ. In this case, the proof ofTheorem 2.6still works with minor changes, hence we omit the details.

(10)

Now we assume thatψCϕ :ApαHμis compact, then it is clear thatψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded. Similarly to the proof ofTheorem 2.6, we see thatψHμ. Letzkk∈Nbe a sequence inBsuch that |ϕzk| → 1 ask → ∞if such a sequence does not exist that condition2.38is vacuously satisfied. Set

fkz

ln e

1−ϕ zk2

−1/p

ln e

1− z, ϕ

zk

, k∈N. 2.39

From2, Theorem 1.12, we see thatfkk∈Nis a bounded sequence inApα. Moreover,fk → 0 uniformly on compact subsets ofBask → ∞. It follows fromLemma 2.2thatψCϕfkHμ → 0 ask → ∞.Because

ψCϕfk

Hμ sup

z∈B μ

|z|ψCϕfk

z

μzkψ zk

ln e

1−ϕ zk2

1−1/p ,

2.40

we obtain

klim→ ∞μzkψ zk

ln e

1−ϕ zk2

1−1/p

0, 2.41

from which we get the desired result. The proof is completed.

Theorem 2.11. Assume thatp >1,αis a real number such thatnα1 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ:ApαHμ,0 is bounded if and only ifψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded andψHμ,0.

Proof. First assume thatψCϕ : ApαHμ,0 is bounded. Then clearly ψCϕ : ApαHμ is bounded. Takingfz 1, then employing the boundedness ofψCϕ :ApαHμ,0, we have thatψHμ,0, as desired.

Conversely, assume that ψCϕ : ApαHμ is bounded and ψHμ,0. For each polynomialp, we have

μ

|z|ψCϕp

zμ

|z|p

ϕzψz≤ pμ

|z|ψz, 2.42

from which we have thatψCϕp∈Hμ,0.

Since the set of all polynomials is dense inApαsee2, for everyfApα there is a sequence of polynomialspkk∈Nsuch that

pkf

Apα −→0 ask−→ ∞. 2.43

(11)

From the boundedness ofψCϕ:ApαHμ, we have that ψCϕpkψCϕf

HμψCϕpkf

Apα −→0 ask−→ ∞. 2.44 SinceHμ,0 is a closed subset ofHμ, we obtain

ψCϕf lim

k→ ∞ψCϕpkHμ,0. 2.45

Therefore,ψCϕ:ApαHμ,0 is bounded.

Using Theorems 2.10 and 2.11, similarly to the proof of Theorem 2.8we obtain the following result. We omit the proof.

Theorem 2.12. Assume thatp >1,αis a real number such thatnα1 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ:ApαHμ,0 is compact if and only if

|z| →lim1μ

|z|ψz

ln e

1−ϕz2 1−1/p

0. 2.46

Theorem 2.13. Assume that 0< p1,αis a real number such thatnα10,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded if and only ifψHμ.

Proof. Assume thatψHμ. For anyfApα, byLemma 2.1we have

sup

z∈Bμ

|z|ψCϕf

z≤CfApαsup

z∈Bμ

|z|ψz. 2.47

From the above inequality, we obtain thatψCϕ:ApαHμis bounded.

Conversely, assume thatψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded. Takingfz 1 and using the boundedness ofψCϕ:ApαHμ, we getψHμ, as desired.

Theorem 2.14. Assume that 0< p1,αis a real number such thatnα10,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. ThenψCϕ :ApαHμis compact if and only ifψHμand

|ϕz| →lim 1μ

|z|ψz0. 2.48

Proof. First assume that ψHμ and 2.48 holds. In this case, the proof is similar to the corresponding part of the proof ofTheorem 2.6and hence will be omitted.

(12)

Now we suppose thatψCϕ :ApαHμis compact. It follows fromTheorem 2.13and the boundedness ofψCϕ :ApαHμthatψHμ. Letzkk∈Nbe a sequence inBsuch that

|ϕzk| → 1 ask → ∞. Set

fkz 1−ϕ zk2 1−

z, ϕ zk

, k∈N. 2.49

From 2, Theorem 6.6, we see that fkk∈N is a bounded sequence in Apα. Moreover, fk

converges to zero uniformly on compact subsets ofB. Hence byLemma 2.2it follows that lim sup

k→ ∞

ψCϕfk

Hμ 0. 2.50

On the other hand, we obtain ψCϕfk

Hμ sup

z∈B μ

|z|ψCϕfk

z≥μzkψ

zk. 2.51

Combining2.50with2.51we obtain that2.48holds.

Theorem 2.15. Assume that 0< p1,αis a real number such thatnα10,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. Then the following statements are equivalent:

iψCϕ :ApαHμ,0 is bounded;

iiψCϕ :ApαHμ,0 is compact;

iiiψHμ,0.

Proof. ii⇒i. This implication is clear.

i⇒iii. Takingfz 1 and employing the boundedness ofψCϕ :ApαHμ,0,we obtain thatψHμ,0.

iii⇒ii. For anyfApαwithfApα ≤1, we have μ

|z|ψCϕf

z≤CfApαμ

|z|ψz

|z|ψz, 2.52

from which we obtain

|z| →lim1 sup

fAp

α≤1μ

|z|ψCϕf

z≤C lim

|z| →1μ

|z|ψz0. 2.53

UsingLemma 2.4, we obtain thatψCϕ :ApαHμ,0 is compact.

2.3. Casen1α <0

Theorem 2.16. Assume thatp > 0,αis a real number such thatnα1 < 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. Then the following statements are equivalent:

(13)

iψCϕ :ApαHμis bounded;

iiψCϕ :ApαHμis compact;

iiiψHμ.

Proof. ii⇒i. This implication is obvious.

i⇒iii. Takingfz 1, then using the boundedness ofψCϕ :ApαHμ,we obtain thatψHμ.

iii⇒ii. IffApα, byLemma 2.1we obtain μ

|z|ψCϕf

z≤CfApαμ

|z|ψz, 2.54

from which it follows thatψCϕ:ApαHμis bounded. Letfkk∈Nbe any bounded sequence inApαandfk → 0 uniformly onBask → ∞. ByLemma 2.3, we have

ψCϕfk

Hμ sup

z∈Bμ

|z|fk

ϕz

ψz≤ ψHμ sup

z∈B

fk

ϕz−→0, 2.55

ask → ∞. The result follows fromLemma 2.2.

Similarly to the proof ofTheorem 2.15, we have the following result. We omit the proof here.

Theorem 2.17. Assume thatp > 0,αis a real number such thatnα1 < 0,ψHB,ϕis a holomorphic self-map ofB,andμis a normal function on0,1. Then the following statements are equivalent:

iψCϕ :ApαHμ,0 is bounded;

iiψCϕ :ApαHμ,0 is compact;

iiiψHμ,0.

Acknowledgment

The author is supported partly by the NSF of Guangdong Province of Chinano. 07006700.

References

1 R. Zhao and K. Zhu, “Theory of Bergman spaces on the unit ball,” to appear M´emoires de la Soci´et´e Math´ematique de France.

2 K. Zhu, Spaces of Holomorphic Functions in the Unit Ball, vol. 226 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005.

3 A. L. Shields and D. L. Williams, “Bonded projections, duality, and multipliers in spaces of analytic functions,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 162, pp. 287–302, 1971.

4 S. Stevi´c, “Essential norms of weighted composition operators from theα-Bloch space to a weighted- type space on the unit ball,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2008, Article ID 279691, 10 pages, 2008.

5 S. Stevi´c, “Norm of weighted composition operators from Bloch space toHμon the unit ball,” Ars Combinatoria, vol. 88, pp. 125–127, 2008.

6 C. C. Cowen and B. D. MacCluer, Composition Operators on Spaces of Analytic Functions, Studies in Advanced Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1995.

(14)

7 X. Zhu, “Weighted composition operators betweenHand Bergman type spaces,” Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 719–727, 2006.

8 S. Stevi´c, “Weighted composition operators between mixed norm spaces andHαspaces in the unit ball,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2007, Article ID 28629, 9 pages, 2007.

9 S. Li and S. Stevi´c, “Weighted composition operators betweenHandα-Bloch spaces in the unit ball,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 12, pp. 1625–1639, 2008.

10 S. Li and S. Stevi´c, “Weighted composition operators fromHto the Bloch space on the polydisc,”

Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2007, Article ID 48478, 13 pages, 2007.

11 S. Li and S. Stevi´c, “Weighted composition operators fromα-Bloch space toHon the polydisc,”

Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization, vol. 28, no. 7-8, pp. 911–925, 2007.

12 S. Stevi´c, “Composition operators betweenHandα-Bloch spaces on the polydisc,” Zeitschrift f ¨ur Analysis und ihre Anwendungen, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 457–466, 2006.

13 X. Zhu, “Volterra composition operators from generalized weighted Bergman spaces toμ-Bloch type spaces,” to appear in Journal of Function Spaces and Applications.

14 D. D. Clahane and S. Stevi´c, “Norm equivalence and composition operators between Bloch/Lipschitz spaces of the ball,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2006, Article ID 61018, 11 pages, 2006.

15 X. Fu and X. Zhu, “Weighted composition operators on some weighted spaces in the unit ball,”

Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2008, Article ID 605807, 8 pages, 2008.

16 S. Li and S. Stevi´c, “Weighted composition operators from Bergman-type spaces into Bloch spaces,”

Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences. Mathematical Sciences, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 371–385, 2007.

17 S. Li and S. Stevi´c, “Products of Volterra type operator and composition operator fromHand Bloch spaces to Zygmund spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 345, no. 1, pp. 40–52, 2008.

18 K. Madigan and A. Matheson, “Compact composition operators on the Bloch space,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 347, no. 7, pp. 2679–2687, 1995.

19 S. Ohno, K. Stroethoff, and R. Zhao, “Weighted composition operators between Bloch-type spaces,”

The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 191–215, 2003.

20 A. Montes-Rodr´ıguez, “Weighted composition operators on weighted Banach spaces of analytic functions,” Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 872–884, 2000.

21 S. Stevi´c, “Essential norms of weighted composition operators from the Bergman space to weighted- type spaces on the unit ball,” to appear in Ars Combinatoria.

22 X. Zhu, “Generalized weighted composition operators from Bloch type spaces to weighted Bergman spaces,” Indian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 139–150, 2007.

参照

関連したドキュメント

We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the boundedness and compactness of weighted composition operators between spaces of vector- valued Lipschitz functions.. We then

Ueki, “Weighted composition operators between weighted Bergman spaces and Hardy spaces on the unit ball of C n ,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol..

Pointwise multipiers from weighted Bergman spaces and Hardy spaces to weighted Bergman spaces are characterized by using Bloch type spaces, BMOA type spaces, weighted Bergman spaces

Tong Qingshan: College of Mathematics and Computer, Changsha University of Science and Tech- nology, Changsha

We also prove that the spatial numerical range of finite rank operators on weighted Hardy spaces is star shaped; though, in general, it does not need to be convex.. The Banach

Stevi´c, “On a new integral-type operator from the Bloch space to Bloch-type spaces on the unit ball,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. Hu, “Extended

Zhao, “Weighted composition operators between different weighted Bergman spaces and different Hardy spaces,” Illinois Journal of Mathematics, vol.. Zhao, “Weighted composition

Liu, Weighted Block-Hardy spaces estimates for commutators of Littlewood- Paley operators, Southeast Asian Bull.. Liu, Weighted weak type estimates for commutators of