WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS FROM THE BESOV SPACES INTO THE BLOCH SPACES
Flavia Colonna and Songxiao Li
Abstract
Letϕbe an analytic self-map of the open unit diskDin the complex planeCand letube a fixed analytic function onD. The weighted com- position operator is defined on the spaceH(D) of analytic functions onD by
uCϕf=u·(f◦ϕ), f∈H(D).
In this work, we characterize the bounded and the compact weighted composition operators from the Besov spaces Bp (1 < p < ∞) into the Bloch space as well as into the little Bloch space.
1 Introduction
LetDbe the open unit disk in the complex planeC.Denote byH(D) the class of all complex-valued functions analytic on D. An analytic self-map ϕ of D induces the composition operatorCϕ onH(D), defined byCϕ(f) =f ◦ϕforf analytic onD.
Let u be a fixed analytic function onD. The functions ϕand uinduce a linear operatoruCϕon the space H(D) as follows:
uCϕf =u·(f◦ϕ), f∈H(D),
where the dot denotes pointwise multiplication. An operator of the formuCϕ
is called aweighted composition operator. The functionsuandϕare called the symbolsof the operatoruCϕ. We may regard this operator as a generalization of a multiplication operator and a composition operator.
An interesting problem in operator theory is to provide a function theoretic characterization of the symbols of the bounded or the compact weighted com- position operators on various spaces. For an in-depth study of the composition operators, see [5] and [17].
2000Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 47B33, Secondary 30H30.
Key words and phrases. Weighted composition operator, Besov space, Bloch space The second author is supported by the NNSF of China(No. 11001107), NSF of Guangdong Province, China(No.10451401501004305).
An analytic functionf inDis said to belong to theBloch spaceBif B(f) = sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|f0(z)|<∞.
The expression B(f) defines a seminorm while the natural norm is given by kfkB =|f(0)|+B(f). Under this norm B is a Banach space. Let B0 denote the subspace ofB, called thelittle Bloch space, consisting of thosef ∈ Bwhich satisfy the condition
lim
|z|→1(1− |z|2)|f0(z)|= 0.
For p ∈ (1,∞), the analytic Besov space, denoted by Bp, is the set of all f ∈H(D) for which
Lpp(f) = Z
D
|f0(z)|p(1− |z|2)p−2dA(z)<∞, wheredAis the normalized area measure onD. The correspondence
f 7→ kfkBp =|f(0)|+Lp(f)
defines a norm which yields a Banach space structure onBp. In particular,B2 is the classical Dirichlet space with an equivalent norm.
The composition operators on the Bloch spaces B and B0 were studied by Madigan and Matheson in [13]. In [16], Ohno and Zhao extended their results by characterizing the bounded and the compact weighted composition opera- tors on these spaces. In [14], Ohno characterized the bounded and the com- pact weighted composition operators betweenH∞and the Bloch spaceB. The weighted composition operator from Bergman-type spaces and the Zygmund spaces into the Bloch spaces were investigated by the second author and Stevi´c in [10, 12], respectively.
The issues of boundedness and compactness of the composition operators and of the weighted composition operators between different analytic function spaces on the unit disc D, the unit ball, as well as on bounded homogeneous domains inCn were studied by several authors, for example, in [1–4, 6–16, 18–
20, 24, 25, 27–30] (see also related references therein).
In this paper we study the weighted composition operators from the Besov spaceBp into the Bloch spaceBand the little Bloch spaceB0.
Specifically, in Section 2, we characterize the bounded weighted composition operators from the Besov space into the Bloch space and, in Section 3, we give compactness criteria for such operators.
In Section 4, we characterize the bounded and the compact weighted com- position operators fromBp into the little Bloch space.
Finally, in Section 5, we highlight the results for the component operators Cϕ and the multiplication operatorMu defined asMu(f) =u·f. In particular, we point out that, for 1 < p < ∞, a composition operator from Bp to B is compact if and only if it is compact as an operator acting on several other analytic function spaces (and likewise mapping into the Bloch space).
Throughout this paper, we adopt the convention of denoting byCa positive constant which may differ from one occurrence to the next. The notationab means that there is a positive constantC such thata≤Cb. If bothaband bahold, we use the notationab.
2 Boundedness into B
In this section we characterize the bounded weighted composition operatoruCϕ: Bp → B. In order to prove the main results of this paper, we shall need the following lemmas.
Lemma 1. [26] Suppose thatz∈D,t >−1. Then It(z) =
Z
D
(1− |w|2)t
|1−zw|¯2+tdA(w)ln 2
1− |z|2, as |z| →1.
Lemma 2. [4] For an analytic self map ϕ on D and a function u ∈ B, the following statements are equivalent:
(a) The sequence{kuϕnkB}n∈N is bounded.
(b) sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 <∞.
(c) sup
w∈D
kuCϕLϕ(w)kB<∞, where fora∈D,La(z) = a−z
1−az, z∈D. Forw∈D, define the function
fw(z) = ln 2
1− |w|2 −1/p
ln 2 1−wz
, z∈D.
We shall now use the family{fϕ(λ):λ∈D} and the sequence (pn)n≥0 defined bypn(z) =znto characterize the bounded weighted composition operators from BptoB. Note that, however,pnis unbounded inBpand thus the characterizing condition of boundedness we obtain in terms ofuCϕpn =uϕn does not follow immediately from the boundedness ofuCϕ.
Theorem 1. Suppose that1< p <∞,u∈H(D)andϕis an analytic self-map ofD. Then the following statements are equivalent.
(a) uCϕ:Bp→ B is bounded.
(b) sup
λ∈D
kuCϕfϕ(λ)kB<∞ and L:= sup
n≥0
kuϕnkB<∞.
(c)
sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
<∞ (1)
and
sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|ϕ0(z)||u(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 <∞. (2)
Proof. (a) ⇒(b) Suppose thatuCϕ:Bp→ B is bounded. Then applying this operator to the functionsf(z) =z andf(z) = 1, we obtain that the quantities
sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z) +u0(z)ϕ(z)| and sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
are finite. These facts and the boundedness of the functionϕ(z) indicate that M := sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|<∞. (3) Further, forλ∈D, consider
gλ(z) =Lϕ(λ)(z) = ϕ(λ)−z
1−ϕ(λ)z, z∈D.
By the M¨obius invariance of the Besov space seminorm Lp, given f ∈ Bp, we have Lp(f ◦gλ) = Lp(f) for all λ ∈ D. In particular, a straightforward calculation shows that forf(z) =z,
Lpp(gλ) =Lpp(f) = Z
D
(1− |z|2)p−2dA(z) = 1
p−1. (4)
Hence
sup
λ∈D
kgλkBp= sup
λ∈D
(|ϕ(λ)|+Lp(gλ))≤1 + 1 (p−1)1/p. Moreover gλ(ϕ(λ)) = 0 and
g0λ(ϕ(λ)) = 1 1− |ϕ(λ)|2. Thus,
1 + 1
(p−1)1/p
kuCϕk ≥ kuCϕgλkB≥ (1− |λ|2)|u(λ)ϕ0(λ)|
1− |ϕ(λ)|2 ,
which yields (2). Sinceu=uCϕ1 ∈ B, we may apply Lemma 2 and conclude thatL <∞.
Furthermore, it follows easily from Lemma 1 that fw ∈ Bp, and C :=
supw∈DkfwkBp is finite. Thus, by the boundedness of uCϕ : Bp → B, we have
kuCϕfwkB≤CkuCϕk.
Therefore,
sup
w∈D
kuCϕfwkB<∞, which in particular yields (b).
(b)⇒(c) Assume (b) holds. Condition (2) follows immediately from Lemma 2, which can be applied sinceu∈ B(indeed, taking n= 0, we havekukB ≤L <
∞).
Next observe that, forλ∈D, kuCϕfϕ(λ)kB ≥
(1− |λ|2)|u(λ)ϕ(λ)ϕ0(λ)|
1− |ϕ(λ)|2
ln 2 1− |ϕ(λ)|2
−1/p
−(1− |λ|2)|u0(λ)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(λ)|2
1−1/p .
Thus,
(1− |λ|2)|u0(λ)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(λ)|2 1−1/p
≤ kuCϕfϕ(λ)kB+(1− |λ|2)|u(λ)ϕ(λ)ϕ0(λ)|
1− |ϕ(λ)|2
ln 2 1− |ϕ(λ)|2
−1/p
≤ kuCϕfϕ(λ)kB+(1− |λ|2)|u(λ)ϕ0(λ)|
1− |ϕ(λ)|2
ln 2
1− |ϕ(λ)|2 −1/p
. (5)
Taking the supremum over allλ∈D, (5) yields (1).
(c) ⇒ (a) Let q denote the conjugate index of p, i.e. 1/p+ 1/q = 1. For f ∈Bp, using the H¨older inequality and Lemma 1, we obtain
|f(w)−f(0)|= Z
D
f0(z) w
1−w¯zdA(z)
≤ Z
D
|f0(z)|(1− |z|2)1−2/p|w|(1− |z|2)1−2/q
|1−w¯z| dA(z)
≤Z
D
|f0(z)|p(1− |z|2)p−2dA(z)1/pZ
D
|w|q(1− |z|2)q−2
|1−w¯z|q dA(z)1/q
≤ kfkBp
Z
D
(1− |z|2)q−2
|1−w¯z|q dA(z)1/q
≤CkfkBp
ln 2
1− |w|2 1−1/p
.
Since|f(0)| ≤ kfkBp, we deduce that
|f(w)| ≤CkfkBp
ln 2
1− |w|2 1−1/p
. (6)
The inequality
|f0(z)| ≤ C
1− |z|2kfkBp, z∈D, (7) for some positive constantC, holds sinceBp is continuously embedded intoB.
For an arbitraryz inDand forf ∈Bp, (6) and (7) show that (1− |z|2)|(uCϕf)0(z)|
≤ (1− |z|2)|u0(z)||f(ϕ(z))|+ (1− |z|2)|f0(ϕ(z))||u(z)ϕ0(z)|
≤ C(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
kfkBp
+C(1− |z|2)|u(z)||ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 kfkBp. (8)
Taking the supremum in (8) over allz∈Dand then utilizing conditions (1) and (2), we conclude that the operatoruCϕ:Bp→ B is bounded.
3 Compactness into B
We begin this section by stating three preliminary lemmas which will be used to characterize the compact weighted composition operators fromBp into the Bloch space.
Lemma 3. [4]For an analytic self mapϕonDand a functionu∈ Bsatisfying the condition
lim
|ϕ(z)|→1(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|= 0, the following statements are equivalent:
(a) lim
n→∞kuϕnkB= 0.
(b) lim
|ϕ(z)|→1
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 = 0.
(c) lim
|λ|→1sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|u(z)(CϕLλ)0(z)|= 0.
The following criterion for compactness follows from Lemma 3.7 of [24].
Lemma 4. Suppose that 1< p <∞,u∈H(D) andϕis an analytic self-map of D. The operator uCϕ : Bp → B is compact if and only if for any bounded sequence (fn)n∈N in Bp which converges to zero uniformly on compact subsets ofD, we havekuCϕfnkB→0 asn→ ∞.
We are now ready to prove the main result of this section.
Theorem 2. Suppose that1< p <∞,u∈H(D),ϕis an analytic self-map of D, anduCϕ:Bp→ Bis bounded. Then the following statements are equivalent.
(a) uCϕ:Bp→ B is compact.
(b)
lim
|ϕ(z)|→1kuCϕfϕ(z)kB= 0 and lim
n→∞kuϕnkB= 0. (9)
(c)
lim
|ϕ(z)|→1(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
= 0 (10)
and
lim
|ϕ(z)|→1
(1− |z|2)|u(z)||ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 = 0. (11)
Proof. (a)⇒(b) SupposeuCϕ:Bp→ Bis compact. Let (zn)n∈Nbe a sequence in D such that |ϕ(zn)| → 1 as n → ∞. If such a sequence does not exist conditions (10) and (11) are automatically satisfied, so suppose such a sequence exists. Forn∈Nandz∈D, define
fn(z) =fϕ(zn)=
ln 2
1− |ϕ(zn)|2 −1/p
ln 2
1−ϕ(zn)z
.
Then, the sequence{fn} converges to 0 uniformly on compact subsets ofDas n→ ∞and, as was observed in Section 2, supn∈NkfnkBp is finite. SinceuCϕ
is compact, by Lemma 4 we have
kuCϕfϕ(zn)kB→0 as n→ ∞.
Thus, the first condition in (9) is satisfied. By Lemma 3, to prove thatkuϕnkB→ 0 asn→ ∞, it suffices to show that
lim
|ϕ(z)|→1(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|= 0 (12) and that (11) holds. Condition (12) follows at once from the boundedness of uCϕand condition (1).
To prove (11), assume (zn)n∈N is a sequence inDsuch that |ϕ(zn)| →1 as n→ ∞. Forn∈Nandz∈D, define
gn(z) =1− |ϕ(zn)|2 1−ϕ(zn)z
ϕ(zn)−z 1−ϕ(zn)z
for a sequence (zn)n∈N in D such that |ϕ(zn)| → 1 as n → ∞. Then (gn)n∈N
converges to 0 uniformly on every compact subset ofD,gn(ϕ(zn)) = 0 and gn0(ϕ(zn)) = 1
1− |ϕ(zn)|2.
We now prove that (gn)n∈N is a bounded sequence in Bp. A straightforward calculation shows that
gn(Lϕ(zn)(z)) =z−ϕ(zn)z2, z∈D.
Thus, by the conformal invariance of the Besov seminorm, using (4), we have Lpp(gn) = Lpp(gn◦Lϕ(zn)) =
Z
|1−2ϕ(zn)z|p(1− |z|2)p−2dA(z)
≤ 3p Z
(1− |z|2)p−2dA(z) = 3p p−1. Therefore,
kgnkBp=|gn(0)|+Lp(gn)≤(1− |ϕ(zn)|2)|ϕ(zn)|+ 3
(p−1)1/p ≤1 + 3 (p−1)1/p, proving the boundedness of (gn)n∈N inBp. Then
(1− |zn|2)|u(zn)ϕ0(zn)|
1− |ϕ(zn)|2 ≤sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|(uCϕgn)0(z)| ≤ kuCϕgnkB→0 (13) asn→ ∞.
From (13) it follows that condition (11) holds, as desired.
(b)⇒ (c) Assume (b) holds and that (zn)n∈Nis a sequence in Dsuch that
|ϕ(zn)| →1 asn→ ∞. As noted in the proof of Theorem 1, we have kuCϕfϕ(zn)kB ≥ sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|(uCϕfϕ(zn))0(z)|
≥
(1− |zn|2)|u(zn)ϕ(zn)ϕ0(zn)|
1− |ϕ(zn)|2
ln 2
1− |ϕ(zn)|2 −1/p
−(1− |zn|2)|u0(zn)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(zn)|2
1−1/p .
Thus, from (9), we obtain lim
|ϕ(zn)|→1
(1− |zn|2)|u(zn)ϕ(zn)ϕ0(zn)|
1− |ϕ(zn)|2
ln 2
1− |ϕ(zn)|2 −1/p
= lim
|ϕ(zn)|→1(1− |zn|2)|u0(zn)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(zn)|2 1−1/p
, (14)
provided that one of these two limits exists.
As argued in (a) ⇒ (b), due to the boundedness of uCϕ, condition (12) holds, so we may apply Lemma 3. It follows that (11) holds.
From (11) we have
n→∞lim
(1− |zn|2)|u(zn)ϕ(zn)ϕ0(zn)|
1− |ϕ(zn)|2
ln 2 1− |ϕ(zn)|2
−1/p
= 0.
Therefore by (14), we get lim
|ϕ(z)|→1(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
= 0,
which yields (10).
(c)⇒(a) First assume conditions (10) and (11) hold. In light of Lemma 4, the compactness ofuCϕ will be proved if it can be shown thatkuCϕfnkB→0 as n → ∞ for any sequence (fn)n∈N bounded in Bp converging to 0 uni- formly on compact subsets of D. Let (fn)n∈N be such a sequence and set Q= supn∈NkfnkBp.
By (10) and (11), for anyε >0, there is a constantδ, 0< δ <1, such that δ <|ϕ(z)|<1 implies
(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
< ε/Q and
|u(z)|(1− |z|2)|ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 < ε/Q.
LetK={w∈D:|w| ≤δ}and setE={z∈D: δ <|ϕ(z)|<1}=D\ϕ−1(K).
By the boundedness ofuCϕ:Bp→ B, which in particular yieldsu=uCϕ1∈ B, we have
B(uCϕfn) = sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|(uCϕfn)0(z)|
≤ sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|u0(z)fn(ϕ(z))|+ sup
z∈D
(1− |z|2)|u(z)fn0(ϕ(z))ϕ0(z)|
≤ sup
z∈ϕ−1(K)
(1− |z|2)|u0(z)fn(ϕ(z))|+ sup
z∈E
(1− |z|2)|u0(z)fn(ϕ(z))|
+ sup
z∈ϕ−1(K)
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)||fn0(ϕ(z))|
+ sup
z∈E
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)||fn0(ϕ(z))|
≤ kukB sup
w∈K
|fn(w)|+M sup
w∈K
|fn0(w)|
+Csup
z∈E
(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
kfnkBp
+Csup
z∈E
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 kfnkBp
≤ kukB sup
w∈K
|fn(w)|+M sup
w∈K
|fn0(w)|+Cε, whereM = supz∈D(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|.Therefore,
kuCϕfnkB=|u(0)fn(ϕ(0))|+B(uCϕfn)
≤ kukB sup
w∈K
|fn(w)|+M sup
w∈K
|fn0(w)|+ Cε+|u(0)fn(ϕ(0))|.(15) SinceKis compact andfn→0 pointwise, it follows that,
n→∞lim sup
w∈K
|fn(w)|= 0
and limn→∞|u(0)fn(ϕ(0))| = 0. On the other hand, by Cauchy’s estimates, sincefnconverges to zero uniformly on compact subsets ofD, so doesfn0. From (15), lettingn→ ∞, we obtain
lim sup
n→∞
kuCϕfnkB≤Cε.
Sinceεis an arbitrary positive number, it follows that limn→∞kuCϕfnkB= 0.
Therefore,uCϕ:Bp→ B is compact.
4 Boundedness and compactness into the little Bloch space
We begin the section with two preliminary lemmas.
Lemma 5. Suppose that 1< p <∞,u∈H(D) andϕis an analytic self-map ofD. Then,
lim
|z|→1(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
= 0 (16)
if and only ifu∈ B0 and
lim
|ϕ(z)|→1(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
= 0. (17)
Proof. Suppose that (16) holds, then
(ln 2)1−1/p(1− |z|2)|u0(z)| ≤(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
→0 as|z| →1. Thus,u∈ B0. Moreover, if|ϕ(z)| →1, then|z| →1, so (17) holds.
Conversely, suppose u ∈ B0 and (17) holds. Then, for every ε > 0, there existsr∈(0,1) such that
(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
< ε
whenr <|ϕ(z)|<1. Sinceu∈ B0, there exists aσ∈(0,1), (1− |z|2)|u0(z)| ≤ε.
whenσ <|z|<1.
Therefore, whenσ <|z|<1 andr <|ϕ(z)|<1, we have (1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
< ε. (18)
On the other hand, if|ϕ(z)| ≤randσ <|z|<1,then (1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
< (1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2 1−r2
1−1/p
<
ln 2 1−r2
1−1/p
ε. (19) Combining (18) with (19), we obtain the desired result.
The following lemma can be verified by using the method adopted in the above proof.
Lemma 6. Supposeu∈H(D) andϕis an analytic self-map ofD. Then lim
|z|→1
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 = 0 if and only if
lim
|ϕ(z)|→1
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 = 0 and
lim
|z|→1(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|= 0.
Lemma 7. [13] A closed set K in B0 is compact if and only if it is bounded and satisfies
lim
|z|→1sup
f∈K
(1− |z|2)|f0(z)|= 0.
Using Lemmas 5, 6 and 7, and arguing as in the proof of Theorems 4.4 and 4.5 of [10], we derive the following two results. We omit the details.
Theorem 3. Suppose that1< p <∞,u∈H(D)andϕis an analytic self-map ofD. ThenuCϕ:Bp→ B0 is bounded if and only if uCϕ:Bp→ B is bounded, u∈ B0 and
lim
|z|→1(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|= 0.
Theorem 4. Suppose that1< p <∞,u∈H(D)andϕis an analytic self-map ofD. ThenuCϕ:Bp→ B0 is compact if and only if
lim
|z|→1(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln 2
1− |ϕ(z)|2 1−1/p
= 0 and
lim
|z|→1
(1− |z|2)|u(z)ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 = 0.
5 The component operators
We end the paper by discussing the boundedness and the compactness of the component operators, the multiplication operatorMu and the operatorCϕ.
5.1 The operator M
uIn the special case whenϕ(z) =z, forz∈D, condition (1) implies thatu∈ B0. From Theorems 1 and 3 we deduce the following result.
Corollary 1. Letube analytic onDand1< p <∞. The following statements are equivalent.
(a) Mu:Bp→ Bis bounded.
(b)Mu:Bp→ B0 is bounded.
(c) u∈H∞ andsupz∈D(1− |z|2)|u0(z)|
ln1−|z|2 2
1−1/p
<∞.
From Theorems 2 and 4, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 2. Letube analytic onDand1< p <∞. The following statements are equivalent.
(a) Mu:Bp→ Bis compact.
(b)Mu:Bp→ B0 is compact.
(c) uis identically 0.
5.2 The operator C
ϕBy the Schwartz-Pick Lemma, we see that the operatorCϕ:Bp→ Bis bounded for any analytic self-mapϕofDand 1< p <∞.
From Theorem 2, we obtain the following result which was proved in [4] in the special case of the Dirichlet spaceD.
Corollary 3. Suppose that 1 < p < ∞ and ϕ is an analytic self-map of D. Then the following statements are equivalent:
(a) Cϕ:Bp→ Bis compact.
(b) lim
n→∞kϕnkB= 0.
(c) lim
|ϕ(z)|→1
(1− |z|2)|ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 = 0.
Recall that the space BMOA is defined as the Banach space of functionsf in the Hardy spaceH2 such that
kfk∗= sup
λ∈D
kf◦Lλ−f(λ)kH2<∞ with normkfkBM OA=|f(0)|+kfk∗,where
kgk2H2= sup
0<r<1
1 2π
Z 2π
0
|g(reiθ)|2dθ.
In [23], Theorem 3.1, Tjani characterized the compact composition operators from the Besov spaces, the space BMOA, and the Bloch space intoB in terms of the family of automorphisms{Lλ: λ∈D}.
Theorem 5. [23]Let ϕbe an analytic self-map of Dand letX=Bp(1< p <
∞),BMOA, or B. ThenCϕ:X → Bis a compact operator if and only if lim
|λ|→1kCϕLλkB= 0.
Furthermore, in [4], it was shown that a composition operatorCϕ:H∞→ B is compact if and only if
n→∞lim kϕnkB = 0.
From this, Theorem 5, and Corollary 3, we obtain the following result:
Corollary 4. Suppose that 1 < p < ∞ and ϕ is an analytic self-map of D. Then the following statements are equivalent:
(a) Cϕ:Bp→ Bis compact.
(b)Cϕ:BM OA→ B is compact.
(c) Cϕ:B → B is compact.
(d)Cϕ:H∞→ Bis compact.
From Theorem 3 and using the remarks in [13] (see Section 1), we obtain the following result.
Corollary 5. Suppose that 1 < p < ∞ and ϕ is an analytic self-map of D. Then the following statements are equivalent.
(a) Cϕ:Bp→ B0 is bounded.
(b)Cϕ:B0→ B0 is bounded.
(c) ϕ∈ B0.
Finally, from Theorem 4 and Theorem 1 in [13], we can easily arrive at the following corollary.
Corollary 6. Suppose that 1 < p < ∞ and ϕ is an analytic self-map of D. Then the following statements are equivalent.
(a) Cϕ:Bp→ B0 is compact.
(b)Cϕ:B0→ B0 is compact.
(b) lim
|z|→1
(1− |z|2)|ϕ0(z)|
1− |ϕ(z)|2 = 0.
6 Acknowledgment
We wish to thank the referee for his/her useful suggestions for the improvement of the manuscript.
References
[1] R. Allen and F. Colonna, On the isometric composition operators on the Bloch space in Cn,J. Math. Anal. Appl.355(2009), 675–688.
[2] R. Allen and F. Colonna, Weighted composition operators on the Bloch space of a bounded homogeneous domain,Oper. Theory: Advances and Applications,202(2009), 11–37.
[3] R. Allen and F. Colonna, Weighted composition operators fromH∞to the Bloch space of a bounded homogeneous domain,Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory,66(1) (2010), 21–40.
[4] F. Colonna, New criteria for boundedness and compactness of weighted composition operators mapping into the Bloch space, preprint.
[5] C. C. Cowen and B. D. MacCluer,Composition Operators on Spaces of Analytic Func- tions, Studies in Advanced Math., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995.
[6] X. Fu and X. Zhu, Weighted composition operators on some weighted spaces in the unit ball,Abstr. Appl. Anal.Vol. 2008, Article ID 605807, (2008), 8 pages.
[7] D. Gu, Weighted composition operators from generalized weighted Bergman spaces to weighted-type space,J. Inequal. Appl.Vol. 2008, Article ID 619525, (2008), 14 pages.
[8] S. Li and S. Stevi´c, Weighted composition operators fromH∞to the Bloch space on the polydisc,Abstr. Appl. Anal.Vol. 2007, Article ID 48478, (2007), 13 pages.
[9] S. Li and S. Stevi´c, Weighted composition operators fromα-Bloch space toH∞on the polydisc,Numer. Funct. Anal. Opt.28(2007), 911–925.
[10] S. Li and S. Stevi´c, Weighted composition operators from Bergman-type spaces into Bloch spaces,Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci.117(2007), 371–385.
[11] S. Li and S. Stevi´c, Weighted composition operators betweenH∞andα-Bloch spaces in the unit ball,Taiwanese J. Math.12(2008), 1625–1639.
[12] S. Li and S. Stevi´c, Weighted composition operators from Zygmund spaces into Bloch spaces,Appl. Math. Comput.206(2008), 825–831.
[13] K. Madigan and A. Matheson, Compact composition operators on the Bloch space,Trans.
Amer. Math. Soc.347(7) (1995), 2679–2687.
[14] S. Ohno, Weighted composition operators betweenH∞and the Bloch space,Taiwanese J. Math.5(3) (2001), 555–563.
[15] S. Ohno, K. Stroethoff and R. Zhao, Weighted composition operators between Bloch-type spaces,Rocky Mountain J. Math.33 (1) (2003), 191–215.
[16] S. Ohno and R. Zhao, Weighted composition operators on the Bloch space,Bull. Austral.
Math. Soc.63(2001), 177–185.
[17] J. S. Shapiro,Composition Operators and Classical Function Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.
[18] S. Stevi´c, Composition operators betweenH∞ and theα-Bloch spaces on the polydisc, Z. Anal. Anwendungen,25(4) (2006), 457–466.
[19] S. Stevi´c, Weighted composition operators between mixed norm spaces andHα∞spaces in the unit ball,J. Inequal. Appl.Vol 2007, Article ID 28629, (2007), 9 pages.
[20] S. Stevi´c, Norms of some operators from Bergman spaces to weighted and Bloch-type space,Util. Math.76(2008), 59–64.
[21] S. Stevi´c, Norm of weighted composition operators from Bloch space toHµ∞on the unit ball,Ars. Combin.88(2008), 125–127.
[22] S. Stevi´c, Weighted composition operators from weighted Bergman spaces to weighted- type spaces on the unit ball,Appl. Math. Comput.212(2009), 499–504.
[23] M. Tjani, Compact composition operators on some M¨obius invariant Banach spaces, Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1996.
[24] M. Tjani, Compact composition operators on Besov spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
355(2003), 4683–4698.
[25] W. Yang, Weighted composition operators from Bloch-type spaces to weighted-type spaces,Ars. Combin. 92(2009), 415–423.
[26] K. Zhu, Operator Theory on Function Spaces, Marcel Dekker, Inc. Pure and Applied Mathematics 139, New York and Basel, 1990.
[27] X. Zhu, Weighted composition operators from F(p, q, s) spaces to Hµ∞ spaces, Abstr.
Appl. Anal. Volume 2009, Article ID 290978.
[28] X. Zhu, Generalized weighted composition operators on weighted Bergman spaces,Nu- mer. Funct. Anal. Opt.30(2009), 881–893.
[29] X. Zhu, Weighted composition operators from area Nevalinna spaces into Bloch spaces, Appl. Math. Comput.215(2010), 4340–4346.
[30] X. Zhu, Composition Operators from Zygmund Spaces to Bloch Spaces in the Unit Ball, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc.(2), to appear.
Flavia Colonna: Department of Mathematical Sciences George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030
E-mail address:[email protected]
Songxiao Li: Department of Mathematics, JiaYing University, 514015, Meizhou, GuangDong, China
E-mail address: [email protected]; [email protected]