• 検索結果がありません。

Definition 3. For w ∈ W , we define the length of w, denoted `(w), to be

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Definition 3. For w ∈ W , we define the length of w, denoted `(w), to be"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

July 4, 2016

For today’s lecture, we let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over R, with positive- definite inner product. Let Φ be a root system in V with simple system ∆, and let W = W (Φ) = hs α | α ∈ Φi. Let Π = Φ ∩ R ≥0 ∆ be the unique positive system in Φ containing

∆.

Lemma 1. For t ∈ O(V ) and 0 6= α ∈ V , we have ts α t −1 = s tα . Theorem 2. W = hs α | α ∈ ∆i.

Definition 3. For w ∈ W , we define the length of w, denoted `(w), to be

`(w) = min{r ∈ Z | r ≥ 0, ∃α 1 , . . . , α r ∈ ∆, w = s α

1

· · · s α

r

}.

By convention, `(1) = 0.

Lemma 4. For w ∈ W and α ∈ ∆, the following statements hold:

(i) wα > 0 = ⇒ `(ws α ) = `(w) + 1.

(ii) wα < 0 = ⇒ `(ws α ) = `(w) − 1.

Notation 5. For w ∈ W , we write

n(w) = |Π ∩ w −1 (−Π)|.

Corollary 6. If w ∈ W , then n(w) = `(w).

Notation 7. Let S = {s α | α ∈ ∆}. For I ⊂ S, we define W I = hIi,

I = {α ∈ ∆ | s α ∈ I}, V I = R∆ I ,

Φ I = Φ ∩ V I , Π I = Π ∩ V I . Proposition 8. Let I ⊂ S.

(i) Φ I is a root system with simple system ∆ I .

(ii) Π I is the unique positive system of Φ I containing the simple system ∆ I . (iii) W (Φ I ) = W I .

(iv) Let ` be the length function of W with respect to ∆. Then the restriction of ` to W I

coincides with the length function ` I of W I with respect to the simple system ∆ I .

1

(2)

Notation 9. Let t be an indeterminate over Q, or in other words, consider the polynomial ring Q[t] (or its field of fractions Q(t)). For a subset X of W , write

X(t) = X

w∈X

t `(w) .

Proposition 10. Then

X

I⊂S

(−1) |I| W (t)

W I (t) = t |Π| .

Example 11. Let n ≥ 2 be an integer, and let S n denote the symmetric group of degree n. In other words, S n consists of all permutations of the set {1, 2, . . . , n}. Since permuta- tions are bijections from {1, 2, . . . , n} to itself, S n forms a group under composition. Let ε 1 , . . . , ε n denote the standard basis of R n . For each σ ∈ S n , we define g σ ∈ O(R n ) by setting

g σ (

n

X

i=1

c i ε i ) =

n

X

i=1

c i ε σ(i) , and set

G n = {g σ | σ ∈ S n }.

It is easy to verify that G n is a subgroup of O(V ) and, the mapping S n → G n defined by σ 7→ g σ is an isomorphism. It is well known that S n is generated by its set of transposition.

Via the isomorphism σ 7→ g σ , we see that G n is generated by the set of reflections

{s ε

i

−ε

j

| 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n}. (1) The set

Φ = {±(ε i − ε j ) | 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n}

is a root system, with a positive system

Π = {ε i − ε j | 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n}, (2) and simple system

∆ = {ε i − ε i+1 | 1 ≤ i < n}.

Exercise 12. Set n = 4 in Example 11 and compute the polynomial W (t) using Proposi- tion 10.

2

参照

関連したドキュメント

Let T be a reduced purely two-dimensional scheme, projective over an algebraically closed field of positive characteristic (resp. the algebraic closure of a finite field). Let L be

Key words and phrases: Linear system, transfer function, frequency re- sponse, operational calculus, behavior, AR-model, state model, controllabil- ity,

As we have said in section 1 (Introduction), using the mentioned tree T , Barioli and Fallat gave the first example for which the equivalence between the problem of ordered

Then the change of variables, or area formula holds for f provided removing from counting into the multiplicity function the set where f is not approximately H¨ older continuous1.

arXiv:1101.2075 (2011)), we claimed that both the group algebra of a finite Coxeter group W as well as the Orlik–Solomon algebra of W can be decomposed into a sum of

5.1. Preliminaries on twisted forms. We saw in the previous section that every quadric surface V q is an element of T.. Let X/k be a quadric surface.. The proof of Theorem 7b). First

, 6, then L(7) 6= 0; the origin is a fine focus of maximum order seven, at most seven small amplitude limit cycles can be bifurcated from the origin.. Sufficient

It is worth noting that the above proof shows also that the only non-simple Seifert bred manifolds with non-unique Seifert bration are those with trivial W{decomposition mentioned