Digital
Design
in
Future
FL
)"
tsT
Jv
7'-ve
-1'>t
oxx
HidekiAOYAMA KeioUniversityEtheses
tskeept
Sq#Concept!basicdesignpiaysan importantrole toproduce
industrialproductscoping withdiversjficationof customer:s
preference.
This
paperdescribes
digitalsupport systemsfor
theconcept/basic design
processes
which can shorten theleadtimeofa productand expand designer'sideas,
One
jsa system to automatjcallygenerate
candidate solutions forthedesignfromconcept which isexpressed bynatural language so calied KanseiWords.Second one isa system using mixed reality technologytoevaluate designabilityand operabiljty without making
prototypes,
And other threesystemsfor
sup-portingdesignprocessesare also introducedinoutiine,
1.
Introduction
lt
is
akey
issue
totimelyoffer productsmeetimg withdiver-sifying
preference
ofcustomers. Ibtimelymake offerof prod-ucts, itis
an essentialand importantfactorto shorten the de-veloping time of aproduct.
On theother hand,asit
has
been
become hardtomake differentiationof a productinfunction
design,style designisbecomjng more and more importantto make product
distinction
[1],
[2],
[3].
Abilityand performance
for
designactivity mainlydepend
on hislhersensitivity(Kansei)
and experience. Itneeds longtimetolearnand master
high
sensitivityand rich experience.Indetajldesignprocesses,
CAD
{Computer
Aided Design)systems are used asan extremely usefuland powerfultoolfor
covering hisfherpoorexperience. However,thereisvery few
supporting system tosupport concept and basicdesign
pro-cesses,
ltisan importantrole forindustrjaldesignerstosupply
industrial
products
which satisfycustomer's demands andneeds. Makingthelong-rangeestimation of customeris
de-mands isso hardso thatshortening
lead
timeforsupplying a productjsan indispensableissueforcoping withthe short-range estimation of customer's them.In
thepresentstate,tomake higherefficiencyforthedownstream processesfrom
detail
design
isgoing
totechnicaldifficulties
becausethe effi-ciencyis
reaching tothelimit.Therefore,thetjmefor
upstream2r'if(#Mxkle
specialissueofjapanesesocietyforthescienceofdesignvol.15-4 no.60 2DOe
processes
:theconcept and basicdesignprocesses
including designevaluation processes,should be shortened formaking short leadtime,Asmentjoned above, systems
for
supporting theconcept and basicdesjgnproces$eshave
tobedevelopedforthe fol-lowingreasons :. tosupport and cover Iowersensitivityand
poor
experienceofyoung de$igners,and
. toshorten the leadtimeofan industrial
product
for
meeting short-range estimation ofcustomer's demands.inthispaper,digitaldesignsupport systems which can cope with above i$suesareintroduced.
2.
Basic3D
Model
Construction
System fromlmage/
Concept
lnthischapter, a method toconstruct themany basic shapes satisfying thegiven
impressionlconcept
isintroduced.Theshapes playa role as candidate solutjonsforthedesign
and are indicatedtoa
designen
The designercan decidethe solution fromvarious candidatesgenerated
bythesupportsystem and hislherexperiences. A basicsystem jsthen
de-veloped according totheproposedmethod and thevalidity of
thesystem isverified. Inthedevelopment ofa basicsystem,
design
for
car bodyformisadopted asan example-exercise.2.1
KanseiVVbrdsA
concept and impressionof a product are usua[lyex-pressedina naturallanguage,The author callsthewords
ex-pressingaconcept and impressiont`Kansei
Words",
The
Kan-sei Words expressing theimpressionsforcar bodyformswere
investigated
by
aquestionnaire.
Sixtywords were thenex-tractedfromspoken words and were categorjzed
by
the cius-teranalysjs using thedataobtained from thequestionnajre.Asthe resuits ofthecategorization, ten
Kansei
Word$
weredeterminedtoexpress theimpressionsforcar bodyforms;the
tenKansei
Wbrds
are`'cute'', "sporty", t'casuai", formalt',"soft", "stable", "powerful", "luxurious", un-tired",NII-Electronic Library Service Patan ParamO (a)Sideview A
(b)
Frontview Fig.1,
Parametersdetiningcar bodyshapeI,
BLA/Pai'am.6 Param.9 Param.10 mub.i#
/ps -vauameme・av
¢・{
/,,lr:gi'1pm'.tLff.i1
nvrb pptup'L-- l.,
moa-.-,F-uz'st
ew'r#
vanrv.KntTrmMJ-.ketFM--y
tas--w
lable1. Factorloadingsforside-view$hape impressions FactorlFactor2Factor3Faclor4Factor5 stable
.Q.g62n.o4g0237O.249O.190
spaciousO.Slle.174O.109O.42I-O.102 cute O.ll7'os74n.lgoo.essO.O14 casual-O.371og6g4.012O.099O.222 soft-o.eo7O,820'-O.067-O.2SS-O.122
lm-tired-O.182O.t62O.884LO.lele.l72 1uxwiouse.o67O.344o7ggO.234-O.210 foIMalO.366n.321e779o.17eO.oo5 powerfu1O.429-O.090e.}22O.S89,O.O07 SPOItY-O.8S30213O.206-O.037O.137lable2, Factorloadingsforfront-viewshape impressions
;
Fig,2.Develeped system
'・x・・i,eeIM.za.-・intlh,ww1/lu・"-...-...tt,t.
//ti'g,ill・i,'lilu,,ge.t?・,
iilllllilva111'#.'
illiiitde
'Iliiiill・i,,,l l'i'lt'l'1/'llt'1:'l'l./;-uack /l.;Il'il'i{l・I'cu//'ders'1'/'ll/'
"
rvr" ''"Ilii2.2 3D Model Generationfrom KanseiWbrds
Questionnaires,inwhich fiftytwo persons gave pointsin
from O to5 on each of thetenKanseiWords forthe
typi-caltwentythreeside-view formsand eighteen
persons
gave
points
infromO to5on each ofthetenKanseiWords forthe typicaltwelvefront-view
forms,
were executed inorder totie theKanseiWbrds tocarbody forms.From thequestionnaires,
impressionsforthetypicaltwentythreeside-view formsand
the typicaltwelve front-viewformshave been expressed by
theKanseiWords with weights, Astheside-view formsand
the
front-view
forms
aredefined
by
theform
parametersasshown inFigure1,theKanseiWords expressing impressions
for
carbody
forms
canbe
relatedtotheparametersdefining
car
body
formsby
using a neural network model. However,the neural network model relatingthe
Kansei
Words
totheformparameterscould not generatethe reasonable formfrom the KanseiWords with the weights representing a concept
becausetheKanseiWords have overlapping meaning ineach other. Fortheproblem,another neura[ network model was constructed asfol[ows.
The common
factors
and thefactor
loadings
were extractedbythefactoranalysis using the KanseiWords and weights
obtained
from
thequestionnaires,lables
1
and2
show thefactor
loadings
for
side-view shape impressionsand front-view shape impressionsderivefromthefactor
anaiysis.The extracted factorsdo not have overlapping inthe
meaning.
Consequently,
a neural network model which wasconstructed
by
reiatingthecommonfactors
tothecarformparameterscould generatethereasonable formfromthe com-mon
factors
withweights.In
theneura[ network model, theinputlayeristhecommon factorsand the output layeristhe
form parameters.The$um FPV3,of thefactorIoadingon each common factorisgiventoeach element ofthe inputlayenThe
sum FPVi,,ofthefactorloadingisderivedfromequation
(1
).
r'ifltr#ewsreIg specialissueefjapanEsesocletytorthesclenceofdeslgn
yol.15-4 no,60 2DOB
NII-Electronic Mbra
3
(a}
Soprtypeint:high(b)
Sableand spacious points:highFig.3.Resultsgeneratedbydevelopedsystem
FP}1,=E(PVleightxF2ictorLoading)
{1)
ln
theabove equation(1),
tr3i",
"maight",and 'FLrctet'Laading" mean the factornumbec theweight
given
toaKanseiWord as an impression,and thefactorloadingofa KanseiWord on the common factorsshownlables
land2,
respectively.2.3 System Development and Results
A system
to
automaticallygenerate
the3D
modelfrom
the KanseiWords expressjng carimages
hasbeen developedbyusing theneuralnetwork model as mentioned above, Figure
2
shows the interfacewindow ofthe system bywhich the
Kan-sei Words with weights can
be
input
into
thesystem.Figure3
(a),
(b),
and(c)
show the 3D modelgenerated
bythedevelopedsystem. The formshown inFigure
3(a)
showstheresult from thatthesporty impressionpoint
[s
hjgh
(5
point)and thepointsof other impressionsare middle
(3
point).The formshown inFigure3(b}shows theresult
from
thatthestableand spacious pointsare high
(5
point)and thepoints
of other impressionsare middle
(3
point},Theform
shownin
Figure3(c}shows theresult fromthatand the luxuriousand
formai
pointsare high(5
point)and thepointsof other impres-sions are mjddie{3
point).
As shown intheseresults, jtwas confirmed thatthedevelopedsystem could generatetheform4Twy#ffnk:e
specialissueefiapanesesocietyforthesctenceofdesignvol.15-4 no.60 20D8
Fig.4.Designprocessferdigitalcamera
fromthe KanseiWords expressing concept/impressions ofa car.
3.
Design
Evaluation
System
Using
Mixed
Reality
fechnology
Figure
4
shows an example ofdesign
processesfor
adigi-talcamera. Asshown
in
Figure
4,a designerfirstconsiders and ponders his/herideatoconcrete theproduct
forms by drawingmany sketches, The productdesignsrepresented as sketches are evaluatedby
making rough mock-ups and the 3D digitalmodels areconstructedby
a3D
CAD
system undertheevaluation of the sketches and the rough mock-ups. The constructed 3D digitalmodels arethen converted tothe phys-icalmock-ups bya rapid prototypingsystem toevaluate the
designabiljtyand operability ofthem.The
final
decision
ofthe designisconducted bythedetailedmock-ups after designingtheuser interfaceincludingthebuttonarrangement. Inthese
processes,
making mock-ups needs much time and cost. Thisproblem must be solved tohave highcompetjtive abiljty of
product
development.Forthis
problem,
a method toevaluate a productdesignby using virtual models insteadot physicalmodeis isbeing devel-oped. Sincevirtua[models: 3D digitalmodels, are constructedin
a virkualspace, itisvery easy and inexpensivetomake andmodify them.And recent computer
graphics
technologycanmake the
3D
digital
models inhighreality[4],
[5].
However, virtual models havea seriousprob]em
tha±itisimpossibleto evaluate productdesign
in
touchingthem[6].
Thismeans that virtual models havedifficulty
in
using virtualmodels fordesignNII-Electronic Library Service
Fig,5.Advantagesand disadvantagesofvirtualmodel, physicalmodel, and hybridmodel
lnthischapter, an evaluation method of designabilityand operability of a productwhich hastwo advantages: of touch-ingwith physicalmodels and highefficiency with virtual mod-els isintroduced.Inthemethod, a hybridmodel covering a physicalmodel with a virtual model isconstructed bythe mixed realitytechnologyinthemixed space. As characteris-ticsofthethreemode[s: a virtual model, aphysicalmodel, and
hybridmodel, are shown inFigure5,thehybridmodel can work forminor model change without making a physicalmodel
for
design
evaluation.3.1
Development of System3.1.1
Foundation
ofThe
Method
The introducedmethod evaluates and inspectsthe
design-abilityand operabilityof a
designed
productby
lookingand touching a physicalmodel covered with a virtual model, The virtual model covering aphyslcalmodel can beeasily changedby
a3D
CAD
system,Virtual
modelshaving
similarforms
to
a physicalmodel can
be
evaluatedby
touching the physical model without an uncomfortable feeling.Humans donot have an uncomfortable feeiingeven ifthetouchingmodel form is sfiightlydifferentfromthelookingmodel form.The reason isasfollows.
Humans havehighpositionsensibility on vision butlow po-sition sensibility on touching.Thisisthekey
point
tomake the introducedmethod successful. Inother words, even ifthereareiittledifferencesofthebutton
positions
orthemodel forms between a physicalmodel and acovering virtual model,hu-mans donot feelun-comfortableness inlookingand touching
themodel because
position
identificationbecomes moreef-fectiveinvisionthanintouch.
3.1.2
ldentificationMethod of RelativeRelationshiptween
Real
Space
Coordinates
andVirtual
Spece
CoordinatestoMake Mixed
Space
The
introduced
system offersadesign
toolhaving
both
ad-vantages ofphysical
modes and virtualmodels bymergingtherealapace and a virtualspace. The one oftheessential
Fig.6,ldentiticationofcoordinates byARtoolkit
(http://www,hltl,washington.edu/artoolkiV)
(http:11mtd.fh-hagenbeng.aVdepoVgraphicsfartoo[kit/)
technologiestodevelopsuch des[gntoolistoidentifythe co-ordinates of thereal space and avirtuaj space and tonaturally overlap them.
The real space pictureand avirtual space pictureare
simul-taneouslygiventoan operator byusing a video see-through
head mount display
{HMD)
[7],
[8].
Inthismethod, itisex-tremelyimportantto
precisely
cover arealobjectwithavirtual objectwithno timedelay.Inordertorealizethis,theAR toolkit was utilized as shownin
Figure
6.
The
AR
toolkitcan continu-ously andprecisely
identifythe relative relationship betweentherealspace coordinates and thescreen coordinates of a video see-through HMD inrealtime.
The method using theAR toolkitrecognizes a marker set on a
physical
model inthe real space. When a physicalmodelhavinga marker ismoved and rotated bydesigner'shands
in
theevaluation process,the
marker sometimes comes intoa
blind
spot.Inthe case, there[ative rela ±ionshipof thecoor-dinates
mustbe
lost,
lnorder tosolve thisproblem,a hybrididentification
method has been developed,When themarkeris
in
aview spot,thecoordinates relationship betweenthereal space and a virtual space isidentifiedbyusing theAR toolkit.On
theotherhand,
when the maker isina blindspot, the co-T-ifltz7anve"seg specialissueetjapanesesocietyforthescienceefdesign vol.15-4 ne.60 2008 NII-Electronic Mbra5
y''RapidProlot>'ping.t"=ttt/t/t/t,.
tt=tt
"/,sw,.,y/..m・,v.1/li'・'.
RealSpace DataGiebettprvl
HMD //tttt//./t///t,t/1/t./////・..//t.,////./.111rl'///11t'/llll/,..././//t,.,//-・Trackin!Seiisor' Trackin!Senser' TrackingSensot
/tt/t
t/tt./lpt./.t.t./li
1・//.t"ttt,l/ t/,.l/ttl}/,/・,t・/・//・/.
'
,lll.
t/11/./,. =i/'t/t.
3PCAI]Dava FingerJoi"t.tsig]e 3DPosiTienmldPos ¢Data 3DCG
/.t. I.'l/,
.///ilt#.
it.I
"'
lt.t
tttt S F.S・ l. f.IY, 11/・fF. :su/, /1.,,!t =../t eel{'.n.it.rt.
ttt/.,.ty.'i/'"
・;,lg・',li#,/l・i,11,'t/t/t"f/'//''''ttt//ttt.ttt/ttttt.
l-.ttt
VirtualHandtl.ttttX,M
VirttLalX・'iew.,m/t,n//-///・/・//.
tttt/tt'/x/./t/
ttttttttt.tttttt.//ttttt.tt.t.tttt.t/tt/...t/t.//ttttt.
tttttt:ttttttttttt/:/tt
VirtualSpaceFig.7.Hardware components ofsystem
(a)Physjcalmode)witha
(b)
Physicalmodelwithamaiker magneticsensor
Fig.8.Markerand magnetic sensor
ordinates relationship jsidentifiedbythepositionand the
atti-tude
detected
by
amagnetic trackingsensor set on aphysical model and theHMD. The reason using thehybrididentificationmethod isthattheAR toolkitcan accurately identifythe
coor-dinatesrelationship thanamagnetic trackingsensor buthas
blindspots.
3.1
.3
DevelopedSystem
Flgure7shows the
hardware
components ofthedevelopedsystem. Anaverage
form
moder ofdesigned
and constructed3D digitalmodels jsformedbyarapid
prototyping
system andisused as a physicalmodel.
A
magnetic trackingsensor isset on thebackside ofthe marker attached on aphysical
model to identifythecoordinates ofthe physjcalmodel. Thesystem hasa head mount display
{HMD}
of avideo see-through typeon which a magnetic trackingsensor issetto identifythescreencoordinates of theHMD. The relativerelationship
between
thephysicalmodel coordinates and the screen coordinates is identifiedbytheAR toolkitand
the
two magnetic tracking sen-sors. Therefore,a physicalmodel ispreciselycovered with a virtual modei according totherelative coordinates[9],
A designerwith a HMD can toucha physicalmodel cov-ered with a virtual model ina dynamic stereoscopic vision.
g,o,e;ct,g'geheg,.,of
N
e--
---
(a>Overlapplngby (b)Overlappingby
mafker magneticsensor
Fig,9,Physicatmodel covered with virtualmodel
Datagrovesare used ±odetectthe
joint
angles of an operator' s fingers.And magnetic tracking$ensors areset on thedata grovestodetect
thepositionsand theattitudesof operator" s hands.Thevirtua[ hands are constructed and simulated ina virtual space with these
data:
thejoint
angles ofanopera-tor'sfingersand the positionsand theattitudesof operator's
hands.The
joint
angles ofanoperator'sfingers
and the touch-ingpositionson thefingerstoa physicalmodel enable one to quantitativelyevaluate and inspecttheoperabilityof thede-signed user interfaceincludingbuttonarrangement.
3.2
Executionof DevelopedSystem
3.2.1
Markerand Magneticftacking
Sensor
Figures8
{a)
and(b}
show a physicalmodel with a marker and a magnetic trackingsensor, respectively.As
mentioned above, themarker isused foridentifyingthe coordinatesrela-tionshipbetween aphysicalmodel and thescreen ofa
HMD
projecting
avirtual space. And when the marker ishiddeninthe
proces
of designevaluation, the magnetic tracking sensormounted on thebackof themarker isused forthe
identifica-tion.
Figures
9
(a)
and{b)
show theviews of a physicalmodel covered withavirtualmodei according totherelatjvecoordi-67ifly\nezakEg
specialissueofjapanesesecjetyforthescienceotdesign(a}
Virtualmociel oon$tructiom interface
{b>
Censtfuctedvirtualmodel Fig.1O.Virtuaimodel constructionnates identifiedbythemarker and
by
the magnetic tracking sensors, respectively.A$shown inFigure9
(b},
themagnetictrackingsensor was working when themarker was hidden.
3.2.2
Virtual
Model
Construction
The
developed
system can construct a virtual model byconverting CAD data
(STL
data)of parts,assembling them, and givingfunctions
such as adisp[ay, a button,a LED,etc. to them. Figure1O(a}shows theinterfacetoassemble partsandgivefunctionstotheparts.The interfacecan also designate
thematerial qualitytoeach parttomake realistic computer
graphics.And Figure1O(b)shows an example of a construct-ed virtual model.
3.2.3
Executionof Developed System and EvaluationofOperabilityOfButtonHandling
Thedesignabilityof designedmodels
(virtual
models) whichhavesimilar formstoa physicalmodel can beevaluated
by
lookingand touchingthephysicalmodel covered withavirtual model indesigner'ssensibility, The operability of button
han-dlingis
quantitatlvely
evaluated by distributionof thecontactpointsbetween thethumblfingersand buttonsand the
joint's
Fig.11.Magnetic sensors todetectpositiensand directions ot thumb
and hand
Fig,12,festingview
ang[es of theoperator:s fingers,ltisunderstandable thatthe operability must behigherinthecase thatthe
distribution
ofthecontact
points
betweenthethumblfingersand buttonsis concentrated and thejoint's
angles oftheoperator's fingers aresmaH inhandlingbuttons,
Figure
11
shows adata-glove
todetect
thejoint
angles of theoperator'sfingers.
And positionsand attitudes of thethumb and thehand are alsodetectedbythe magnetic
track-ingsensors. Figure12shows a view of testingof button
han-dlingusingthevirtualthumb.
Figure
l3
(a)
and(b}
show the results of thedistributions ofcontactpoints
for
an easy taskand adifficulttask,respec-tively.
[n
theeasy task,onlyone buttonishandled.And inthedifficulttask,pluralbuttonsare handled.As shown inFigure
13
(a)
and(b),
it
is
quitenatural thatthedistributionof the contact pointsisconcentrated inan easy taskthana difficult task.Therefore,it
maybe
understandable thatdesignabilityofbutton
arrangement isquantitative]yevaluated and in$pected bythedistributionof the contact pointsbetween thethumband
buttons.
7・fft>#anstkfi・E・ specialissueofiapanesesocietyforthesclenceofdesign
(a)
EasytaskFig,13,Distributionofcontacting point
(b)
Djthculttask4.
0ther
Systems
to
Support
ConceptiBasic
designThreesupporting systems toconstruc ±a 3D digitalmodel and sophisticate
it
areintroduced
jnthischapter.4.1 3D Model Construction
System
fromSketchesAdesignerdraws many sketches toconcrete hisfherideain starting processofcar styledesign.Sometimes,thesketches are a side view, afrontview, a back view, and atop view as shown
in
Figure
l4.
In
another case, a birdview sketch is ad-opted. Inthe currentlyused method, a clay model iscreatedbyreferring tosketches, and thedigital3D model is construct-ed by reverse engineering fortheclaymodel. Itneeds much
timeand cost tocreate aclay model and toadapt reverse
en-gineering
foritso thattheprocesses
should berestrictedforafewmodels.
The author hasdeve[opeda system toautomatically con-struct a digitalmodel froma sketch drawn on a screen
pen-tablet.The system can
be
applied fora side view, a set of a side view, a frontview, aback
view,and a topview, or abird view, Figure15shows an example ofa3D
model constructedbythesystem.
4.2
3D
Model ConstructionSystembased
onCharacteF
isticLines
As mentioned jnthechapter 2and thesession
4.1
,a basic3D
digital
model isgeneratedfromaconcept or sketches. The basjcmodel should be sophisticated with characteristiclines.A
system toconsider characteristiclines
byconstructing themon a3D digitalmodel hasbeendevelopedbytheauthon
The
system can construct characteristic linesbythesimple operation:just
drawingcharacteristiclines
on a 3D modelindicatedon a screen with pen-tabletfunctionsas shown in Figure16(a).Figure16(b)shows an example of a 3D digital model on which thecharacteristjc linesareconstructed.
4.3
3D
Model
ConstructionSystem
based
onHighlight
Lines
ln
thefinal
processof car styledesign,
surfaces composing a model should bebeautifiedfromtheview pointof highlightljnes.
Hjghiight
linesare derivedas a setot pointssatisfyingEquation
{2}
forarbitraryconstant values: arbitraryangle op be-tween thereflectedIightand thelookingdirection(Figure
l7).m2(a'n)(b・n)+(a'b)=conset
(2)
Fig,14.Anexample otcaFsketches Fig.15.Constructed3D model
8T'tf(tz\mxk#e
speciaHssueofjapanesesoeietyforthescienceofdesignNII-Electronic Library Service
(a)
DrawingofcharacteristicllnesFig.I6.Modelingusing characterist]c lines
st
i
(b)
Constructionof characteristic Iines"Eh r'u.
/f
Fig.17.Highlightlineca[cuiation
t"
t
'kx・..
(a}Originalsurtaces
A
surface issophisticated on thebasisoftherelationshipbetween
evolute andinvolute.
The
detail
algorithm to re-con-structa surface according totherelationshipbetween evolute andinvolute
shouldbe
referredtoanotherpaper
[1
O]
becausethe explanation ofitisomitted due topaperspace limitations. A system tosophisticateand re-construct a 3D digitalmodel
fromthe view pointof highlightlineshas
been
developed
by
theauthor.Figure1
8(c)
shows an example ofcar shape sophisticated totheoriginal shape shown inFigurel8(a)bythesystem ac-cording totherequired ahighlight
line
shownin
Figure
l
8(b).
5.
ConclusionsThispapermainly introducedthe two supporting systems
forconcept designand operability evaluation. The firstsystem could automatical[y construct a3D digitalmodel formthekey words
(Kansei
words) which express theconcept and imageof adevelopingproduct.
Thesecond system could evafiuateandinspectthedesignabilityand operability of a productwithout making prototypes.
1naddition,threesystems toautomaticaHy construct the3D
digitalmodel fromsketches, sophisticate a 3D digitalmodel
byconstructing characteristiclineson themodel with simple
(b)
lnputofrequired highHghtlineFig,18.
(c>Sophistieatedsuriaces
Resultformultiple surfaces
7'ff(y#nvRresce
specLalissueofjapanesesocietyferthescienceefdesign vel.ls-4 no.6e 2ees
NII-Electronic Mbra
9
operation, and sophisticate thesurfaces composing a model
according tothe
highlight
lines
requiredby
adesigner
weredescribedinoutline,
References
[1]
Mdes
M
T.:Sketch
mapping:Concepttionforstylists,Proceedingsof lnternational
sium on Automotivelechnoiogy&Automation,
(1
998},
341-348.
[2]
Hummels C.C.M, :two-Handed Gedture-Based CarStylinginaVirtualEnvironment,Proceedingsof
tjonal
Symposium
on Automotivelechnology&tion,
(1
997),227-234,[3]
Hummels C.C M. iExploitingtheExpressive:RapidEntryof Car Designer's ConceptuaiSketches jntoa
CAD Environment,Proceedingsof lnternational
sium on Automotivefechnology& Automation,
{l
997),
243-250.
[4]
DrewsR
WeyrichM :lnteractiveFunctionalEvaluationinVirtualPrototypingillustratedbyan Example of a
struction Machine Design,Proc.of IEEE IECON, Vol.4
(1998),2143-2145.
[5]
Zorriasatine,E et al. :A survey of virtua] prototypingtechniquesformechanical productdevelopment,Proc.
InstnMech.Engrs,Vol,2l7,No.B4
(2003},
513-530.[6]
foshikazu,O.et al.:A MixedRea[itySystemwith Visualand 1langibleln±eraction Capability,TVRSJ,Vol.9,No.I
(2004),
79-88.
[7]
KutulakosK N,VallinoJR :Calibration-FreeAugmentedReality,
IEEE
fransaction
on Visualizationand Computer
Graphics,
Vbl.4,No.1(1
998),
1-20.[8]
Park H,Park J:lnvisibleMarker Based Augmented
Reality
System,
Proc.
SPIE,
Vol.5960, Pt.1{2005),
501-508.
[9]
Kiyokawa
K,Ohno
H,and KurataY :AnOptical
Through
Display
for
Mutua[
Occlusion
witha Real-Time StereovisionSystem,
Computers
&Graphics,
Vol.25,No.5
(200l),
765-779.[1
O]
lerukazu
Ogoshi,
Hideki
Aoyama,
Masakazu
Ohnishi
:Studyon DigjtalStyleDesign,
Journal
of theJapanciety forPrecisionEngineering,Vol,70,No.4,
495-501
.
{in
Japanese)
10fw
y#an.ptuklespecialis$ueQfjapanesesecietytorthescieneeetdesign