• 検索結果がありません。

Free ℓ-groups and free products of ℓ-groups Ton Dao-Rong

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Free ℓ-groups and free products of ℓ-groups Ton Dao-Rong"

Copied!
9
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Free ℓ -groups and free products of ℓ -groups

Ton Dao-Rong

Abstract. In this paper we have given the construction of free ℓ-groups generated by a po-group and the construction of free products in any sub-product classUofℓ-groups.

We have proved that theU-free products satisfy the weak subalgebra property.

Keywords: lattice-ordered group (ℓ-group), freeℓ-group, free product ofℓ-groups, sub- product class ofℓ-groups

Classification: 06F15

1. Introduction

We use the standard terminologies and notations of [1], [2], [5]. The group operation of anℓ-group is written by additive notation. A po-group is a partially ordered group [G, P] where P = {x ∈ G | x ≥ 0} is the positive semigroup of G. Let Gand H be two po-groups. A mapϕ: G→H is called a po-group homomorphism, if ϕ is a group homomorphism andx≥y impliesϕ(x) ≥ϕ(y) for anyx, y∈G. A po-group homomorphismϕis called a po-group isomorphism, ifϕis an injection andϕis also a po-group homomorphism.

A partialℓ-groupGis a set with partial operations corresponding to the usual ℓ-group operations·,,|,∨and∧such that whenever the operations are defined for elements ofG, the theℓ-group laws are satisfied. Suppose [G, P] is a po-group.

ThenGhas implicit partial operations∨and∧as determined by the partial order.

That is,

x∨y=y∨x=y if and only if x≤y and

x∧y=y∧x=x if and only if x≤y.

Using these partial lattice operations together with the full group operations,G can be considered as a partialℓ-group. Then we have the following definition as a special case of theU-free algebra generated by a partial algebra.

Definition 1.1. LetU be a class of ℓ-groups and [G, P] be a po-group. The ℓ- groupFU[G, P] is called theU-freeℓ-group generated by [G, P] (orU-freeℓ-group over [G, P]) if the following conditions are satisfied:

(2)

(1) FU([G, P])∈ U;

(2) there exists a po-group isomorphismα:G→ FU([G, P]) such thatα(G) generatesFU([G, P]) as anℓ-group;

(3) ifK∈ U and β:G→K is a po-group homomorphism, then there exists anℓ-homomorphismγ:FU([G, P])→K such thatγα=β.

A

[G,P] FU([G,P])

K α

β

γ

Definition 1.2. Let U be a class ofℓ-groups and {Gλ |λ∈ Λ} be a family of ℓ-groups inU. The U-free product ofGλ is anℓ-groupG, denoted byU`

λ∈ΛG, together with a family of injectiveℓ-homomorphismsαλ:Gλ →G(called copro- jections) such that

(1) U`

λ∈ΛGλ ∈ U;

(2) S

λ∈Λαλ(Gλ) generatesU`

λ∈ΛGλ as anℓ-group;

(3) if K ∈ U and {βλ : Gλ → K | λ∈Λ} is a family ofℓ-homomorphisms, then there exists a (necessarily) unique ℓ-homomorphism γ : G → K satisfyingβλ=γαλ for allλ∈Λ.

A familyU ofℓ-groups is called a sub-product class, if it is closed under taking (1)ℓ-groups and (2) direct products. All our sub-product classes ofℓ-groups are always assumed to contain along with a givenℓ-group all itsℓ-isomorphic copies.

Clearly, all varieties ofℓ-groups are sub-product classes ofℓ-groups. LetL,Rand A be the varieties of all ℓ-groups, representable ℓ-groups and abelianℓ-groups, respectively.

In this paper we will discuss the existence and constructions of free ℓ-groups generated by a po-group and free products in any sub-product classes ofℓ-groups.

In what follows,U is always denoted a sub-product class ofℓ-groups.

2. Construction for aU-free ℓ-group generated by a po-group

In 1963 and 1965, E.C. Weinberg initially considered theA-freeℓ-group gener- ated by a po-group [G, P]. He has given a necessary and sufficient condition for existence and a simple description ofFA([G, P]) in [17], [18].

In 1970, P. Conrad generalized Weinberg’s result as follows.

Lemma 2.1 ([3]).

(1)There exists anL-freeℓ-groupFL([G, P])generated by[G, P], if and only if there exists a po-group isomorphism of[G, P]into anℓ-group, if and only ifP is the intersection of right order onG.

(3)

(2)Suppose thatP =T

λ∈ΛPλwhere{Pλ|λ∈Λ}is the set of all right orders ofGsuch thatPλ ⊇P. IfGλisGwith one such right order, then denote byA(Gλ) theℓ-group of order preserving permutations of Gλ. Eachx∈Gcorresponds to an elementρxofA(Gλ)defined byρxg=g+x. ThenFL([G, P])is the sublattice ofQ

λ∈ΛA(Gλ)generated by the long constantshgi(g∈G).

By Gr¨atzer existence theorem on a free algebra generated by a partial algebra (Theorem 28.2 of [6]) we have

Theorem 2.2. There exists aU-freeℓ-groupFU([G, P])generated by a po-group [G, P]if and only if[G, P]is po-group isomorphic to anℓ-group inU.

Lemma 2.3 (Lemma 11.3.1 of [5]). LetL andL be ℓ-groups and M be a sub- group of L which generates L as a lattice. Let ϕ : M → L be a group ho- momorphism such that for each finite subset {xjk | j ∈ J, k ∈ K} of M, W

j∈J

V

k∈Kxjk = 0 implies W

j∈J

V

k∈Kϕ(xjk) = 0. Then ϕ can be uniquely extended to anℓ-homomorphismϕ:L→L.

LetU be a sub-product class ofℓ-groups. An ℓ-homomorphic imageH of an ℓ-groupGis said to be a U-homomorphic image, if H ∈ U. Suppose that a po- group [G, P] is po-group isomorphic into an ℓ-groupF0 ∈ U with the po-group isomorphism δ. By Lemma 2.1 (1) there exists the L-free ℓ-group FL([G, P]) generated by [G, P] with the po-group isomorphismα: [G, P]→ FL([G, P]). By Definition 1.1 there exists an ℓ-homomorphismγ : FL([G, P]) → F0 such that γα = δ. Let D = {Fλ | λ ∈ Λ} be the set of all U-homomorphic images of FL([G, P]) with theℓ-homomorphismsγλ (λ∈Λ). Thusγ(FL([G, P]))∈D and D is not empty.

[G,P]A G⊆F

Q

λ∈ΛFλ

FL([G,P]) F0

L

π β α γ

δ γλ

β β γo

For each λ∈Λ, γλαis a po-group homomorphism of [G, P] into Fλ. Then the direct productQ

λ∈ΛFλ is anℓ-group inU. Letπbe the natural map ofGonto the subgroupG of long constants ofQ

λ∈ΛFλ. That is, π(g) = (. . . , γλα(g), . . .)

forg∈G. Sinceγα=δis a po-group isomorphism,πis a po-group isomorphism.

LetF be the sublattice of Q

λ∈ΛFλ generated byG. ThenF is anℓ-subgroup ofQ

λ∈Λ, and soF ∈ U.

(4)

Theorem 2.4. Suppose that a po-group[G, P]is po-group isomorphic into an ℓ-group in a sub-product class ofℓ-groups. Then the U-freeℓ-groupFU([G, P]) generated by[G, P]is the sublatticeF of the direct productQ

λ∈ΛFλgenerated by the po-group isomorphic imageGofGwhere{Fλ |λ∈Λ}are allℓ-homomorphic images of theL-freeℓ-groupFL([G, P])generated by[G, P].

Proof: We have already known that F ∈ U and [G, P] is po-group isomorphic into F. Suppose that β is a po-group homomorphism of [G, P] into anℓ-group L ∈ U. Then there exists an ℓ-homomorphism γo : FL([G, P]) → L such that γoα=β. Soγ(FL([G, P]))∈D. Forg=π(g)∈G (g∈G), put

β(g) =β(g).

Then β is a group homomorphism ofG into L and βπ = β. By Lemma 2.3 we only need to show that for each finite subset {gjk | j ∈ J, k ∈ K} ⊆ G, W

j∈J

V

k∈Kβπ(gjk)6= 0 impliesW

j∈J

V

k∈Kπ(gjk)6= 0. In fact, _

j∈J

^

k∈K

γoα(gjk) = _

j∈J

^

k∈K

β(gjk) = _

j∈J

^

k∈K

βπ(gjk)6= 0.

Hence

_

j∈J

^

k∈K

π(gjk) = _

j∈J

^

k∈K

(. . . , γoα(gjk), . . .)

= (. . . , _

j∈J

^

k∈K

γoα(gjk), . . .)6= 0.

Thereforeβ can be uniquely extended to anℓ-homomorphismβ:F →L.

3. Construction of U-free products

Let U be a sub-product class of ℓ-groups and {Gλ | λ ∈ Λ} be a family of ℓ-groups inU. By Corollary 2 of Theorem 2 of [6] theU-free productU`

λ∈ΛGλ always exists. Specifically, there exists an L-free product L`

λ∈ΛGλ with the coprojection αλ. In [7]–[14] J. Martinez, W. Powell and C. Tsinakis have given several descriptions and some properties for the free products in the varietiesR andA. W.C. Holland and E. Scrimger have given a description forL-free product.

LetH be the group free product of{Gλ|λ∈Λ}. LetP ={h∈H |hbe a sum of conjugates in H of elements of S

λ∈ΛG+λ} and P = {Q | Q is the positive cone of a right order onH with P ⊆Q}. Then [H, P] is a po-group and its L- free extensionFL([H, P]) by theℓ-ideal generated by{g∧g+|g∈S

λ∈ΛGλ} (Theorem 3.7 of [4]). There exists a group homomorphismα:H →L`

λ∈ΛGλ which extends everyαλ (λ∈Λ).

It is clear that the cardinal sum⊞Gλis anℓ-group inU and everyGλ (λ∈Λ) can naturally be embedded into⊞λ∈ΛGλas anℓ-group with embeddingδλ. Hence there exists a group homomorphismδ:H →⊞λ∈ΛGλ which extends eachδλ

(5)

HA H⊆F

Q

i∈IFi L`

λ∈ΛGλ

λ∈ΛGλ

Gλ L

π β α αλ

γo

δ γi

β β f δλ

(λ∈Λ) and there exists anℓ-homomorphism γo :L`

λ∈ΛGλ → ⊞λ∈ΛGλ such that γoαλ = δλ for each λ ∈ Λ. Let D = {Fi | i ∈ I} be the set of all U- homomorphic images ofL`

λ∈ΛGλ with theℓ-homomorphismsγi (i∈I). Thus,

λ∈ΛGλ ∈ D and D is not empty. For each λ∈ Λ and each i∈ I, γiαλ is an ℓ-homomorphism ofGλ intoFi. The direct productQ

i∈IFi is anℓ-group inU. For eachλ∈Λ, letπλbe the naturalℓ-homomorphism ofGλonto theℓ-subgroup Gλ ofQ

i∈IFi. That is,

πλ(gλ) = (. . . , γiαλ(gλ), . . .) forgλ ∈Gλ. Let H be the subgroup ofQ

i∈IFi generated byS

λ∈ΛGλ. Let π be the group homomorphism ofH ontoH which extends everyπλ(λ∈Λ). That is,

π(h) = (. . . , γiα(h), . . .)

forh∈H. Since⊞λ∈ΛGλ ∈D and everyδλ (λ∈Λ) is anℓ-isomorphism,πλ is anℓ-isomorphism for each λ∈Λ. LetF be the sublattice ofQ

i∈IFi generated byH. For eachh∈H, put h =π(h). SinceQ

i∈IFi is a distributive lattice, F=

 _

j∈J

^

k∈K

hjk|hjk∈H, J andK finite

 . Then we have the following construction theorem forU`

λ∈ΛGλ.

Theorem 3.1. Suppose that {Gλ | λ ∈ Λ} is a family of ℓ-groups in a sub- product class ofℓ-groups. Then theU-free product U`

λ∈ΛGλ is the sublattice F of the direct productQ

i∈IFi generated by the group homomorphic imageH of the group free product H of Gλ, where {Fi | i ∈ I} are allU-homomorphic images of theL-free productL`

λ∈ΛGλ.

Proof: We have seen that F ∈ U and eachGλ (λ∈Λ) can be embedded into F as an ℓ-group. Suppose thatL ∈ U and {βλ : Gλ →L | λ ∈Λ} is a family ofℓ-homomorphisms. We must show that there exists a uniqueℓ-homomorphism β : F → L such that βπλ = βλ. By the universal property of group free product, there exists a group homomorphismβ:H→Lwhich extends everyβλ (λ∈Λ). For anyh =π(h)∈H, put

β(h) =β(h).

(6)

By the universal property of an L-free product, there exists a unique ℓ-homo- morphismf :L`

λ∈ΛGλ→Lsuch thatβλ=f αλ for eachλ∈Λ. Then f α=βπ=β.

By Lemma 2.3 we only need to show that for each finite subset{hjk|j∈J, k∈ K} ⊆H,W

j∈J

V

k∈Kβπ(hjk)6= 0 impliesW

j∈J

V

k∈Kπ(hjk)6= 0. In fact, _

j∈J

^

k∈K

f α(hjk) = _

j∈J

^

k∈K

βπ(hjk)6= 0.

Becausef(L`

λ∈ΛGλ)∈D,W

j∈J

V

k∈Kγiα(hjk)6= 0 for somei∈I. So _

j∈J

^

k∈K

π(hjk) = _

j∈J

^

k∈K

(. . . , γiα(hjk), . . .)

= (. . . , _

j∈J

^

k∈K

γiα(hjk), . . .)6= 0.

Thereforeβ can be uniquely extended to anℓ-homomorphismβ:F →L.

By using the similar proof as the one for Theorem 3.1 we can get the following result.

Theorem 3.2. Suppose thatU is a sub-product class ofℓ-groups which is con- tained in A and {Gλ | λ ∈ Λ} is a family in U. Then the U-free product

U`

λ∈ΛGλ is the sublattice of Q

i∈IFi generated by the group homomorphic image H of the group free product H of Gλ, where {Fi | i ∈ I} are all ℓ- homomorphic images of theA-free productA`

λ∈ΛGλ. 4. The weak subalgebra property

LetU be a sub-product class ofℓ-groups. U-free products are said to have the subalgebra property if for any family {Gλ |λ∈Λ} in U withℓ-subgroupsHλ ∈ Gλ,U`

λ∈ΛHλis simply theℓ-subgroup ofU`

λ∈ΛGλgenerated byS

λ∈ΛHλ. It is well known thatA-free products satisfy the subalgebra property (Theorem 3.2 of [11]). U-free products are said to have the weak subalgebra property if{Gλ|λ∈ Λ}is a family inUwithℓ-subgroupsHλ⊆Gλand any family ofℓ-homomorphisms σλ :Hλ →L∈ U can be extended to a family of ℓ-homomorphismsσλ :Gλ → L ∈ U such thatL is an ℓ-subgroup of L and σλ|Hλλ, then U`

λ∈ΛHλ is theℓ-subgroup ofU`

λ∈ΛGλ generated byS

λ∈ΛHλ.

Theorem 4.1. Suppose thatU is a sub-product class ofℓ-groups which is con- tained inA. ThenU-free products satisfy the weak subalgebra property.

Proof: Suppose that{Gλ |λ∈Λ} is a family inU with ℓ-subgroupsHλ ⊆Gλ and any family ofℓ-homomorphismsσλ:Hλ→L∈ Ucan be extended to a family

(7)

ofℓ-homomorphismsσλ :Gλ →L ∈ U such thatL is anℓ-subgroup ofL and σλ|Hλλ. We see thatA`

λ∈ΛHλ is theℓ-subgroup ofA`

λ∈ΛGλ generated byS

λ∈ΛHλ.

(1) First we show that any ℓ-homomorphism γ : A`

λ∈ΛHλ → L ∈ U can be extended to an ℓ-homomorphism γ : A`

λ∈ΛGλ → L ∈ U such that L is an ℓ-subgroup of L and γ|A`

λ∈ΛHλ = γ. In fact, any ℓ-homomorphism γ:A`

λ∈ΛHλ→L∈ U induces a family ofℓ-homomorphismsσλ :Hλ →L∈ U such thatγαλλ for eachλ∈Λ whereαλ is the inclusion map. Thusσλ can

A

Hλ Gλ

A`

λ∈ΛHλ A`

λ∈ΛGλ

L

αλ L αλ

σλ σλ

γ γ

be extended to a family ofℓ-homomorphismsσλ :Gλ →L ∈ U such thatL is anℓ-subgroup of L andσλ|Hλλ. By the universal property there exists an ℓ-homomorphismγ:A`

λ∈ΛGλ→Lsuch thatγαλλfor eachλ∈Λ where αλ is the inclusion map. Hence

σλλ|Hλ = (γαλ)|Hλ|Hλ for eachλ∈Λ. By the uniquenessγ|A`λ∈ΛHλ=γ.

(2) Now we show thatU`

λ∈ΛHλ is the ℓ-subgroup ofU`

λ∈ΛGλ generated by the S

λ∈ΛHλ. Let G0 = ⊕λ∈ΛGλ, H0 = ⊕λ∈ΛHλ, G = A`

λ∈ΛGλ and H =A`

λ∈ΛHλ. ThenG0 and H0 are subgroups ofGandH, respectively, and H0 is a subgroup ofG0,H is a subgroup ofG. LetD={Fi|i∈I}be the set of allU-homomorphic images ofGwith theℓ-homomorphismsγi (i∈I). For each

A Q

i∈IEi

Q

i∈IFi

H G

H0 G0

H0 G0 U`

λ∈Λ U`

λ∈Λ

π π

i ∈ I, γi|H(H) is a U-homomorphic image of H. Conversely, if E is a U- homomorphic image ofH with the ℓ-homomorphismγ. It follows from (1) that γ can be extended to an ℓ-homomorphism γ : G → F ∈ U such that E is an

(8)

ℓ-subgroup ofF andγ|H =γ. Hence the set of allU-homomorphic images ofH isC ={Ei |i∈I} where Ei is an ℓ-subgroup of Fi andγi|H(H) =Ei for each i∈ I. By Theorem 3.2 we see that U-free productU`

λ∈ΛGλ is the sublattice of the direct product Q

i∈IFi generated by the group homomorphic image G0 of G0 with the group homomorphism π, and the U-free productU`

λ∈ΛHλ is the sublattice of the direct product Q

i∈IEi generated by the group homomor- phic imageH0 of H0 with the group homomorphismπ. π|Gλ and π|Hλ are all ℓ-homomorphisms for λ ∈ Λ. Hence U`

λ∈ΛGλ is the ℓ-subgroup of Q

i∈IFi generated byS

λ∈ΛGλ whereGλ(Gλ) and U`

λ∈ΛHλ is theℓ-subgroup of Q

i∈IEi generated byS

λ∈ΛHλ whereHλ =π(Hλ). From the above we see that Q

∈IEi is anℓ-subgroup ofQ

i∈IFi and π|H0 =π.

ThereforeU`

λ∈ΛHλ is the ℓ-subgroup ofQ

i∈IFi generated byS

λ∈ΛHλ, and soU`

λ∈ΛHλ is also theℓ-subgroup ofU`

λ∈ΛGλ generated byS

λ∈ΛHλ. 5. An example

Theorem 2.4 and Theorem 2.1 are applicable to all varieties ofℓ-groups. But here we give an example of a class ofℓ-groups which is not a variety.

Anℓ-groupGis said to be weak Hamiltonian if each closed convexℓ-subgroup ofG is normal. Let WH be the set of all weak Hamiltonianℓ-groups. It is easy to show that WH is a sub-product class ofℓ-groups (see [16]) and

A ⊆WH⊆ R ⊆ L.

So we have the construction theorem for the WH-free product.

Theorem 5.1. Suppose that{Gλ |λ∈Λ}is a family inWH. ThenWH`

λ∈ΛGλ is the sublattice ofQ

i∈IFigenerated by the group homomorphic imageHof the group free product H of Gλ, where {Fi | i ∈ I} are all weak Hamiltonian ℓ- homomorphic images ofL`

λ∈ΛGλ.

References

[1] Anderson M., Feil T., Lattice-Ordered Groups (An Introduction), D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1988.

[2] Conrad P.,Lattice-Ordered Groups, Tulane Lecture Notes, Tulane University, 1970.

[3] ,Free lattice-ordered groups, J. of Algebra16(1970), 191–203.

[4] Holland W.C., Scringer E.,Free products of lattice-ordered groups, Algebra Universalis2 (1972), 247–254.

[5] Glass A.M.W., Holland W.C.,Lattice-Ordered Groups(Advances and Techniques), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

[6] Gr¨atzer G.,Universal Algebra, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979.

[7] Martinez J.,Free products in varieties of lattice-ordered groups, Czech. Math. J.22(1972), 535–553.

(9)

[8] ,Free products of abelianℓ-groups, Czech. Math. J.23(1973), 349–361.

[9] Martinez J. (ed.), Ordered Algebraic Structure, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, pp. 11–49.

[10] Powell W.B., Tsinakis C.,Free products of abelianℓ-groups are cardinally indecomposable, Proc. A.M.S.86(1982), 385–390.

[11] ,Free products in the class of abelianℓ-groups, Pacific J. Math.104(1983), 429–442.

[12] ,The distributive lattice free products as a sublattice of the abelian ℓ-group free product, J. Austral. Math. Soc.34(1993), 92–100.

[13] ,Free products of lattice-ordered groups, Algebra Universalis18(1984), 178–198.

[14] ,Disjointness conditions for free products ofℓ-groups, Arkiv. der Math.46(1986), 491–498.

[15] ,Disjoint sets in free products of representableℓ-groups, Proc. A.M.S.104(1988), 1014–1020.

[16] Dao-Rong Ton, Free weak Hamiltonian ℓ-groups, Northeast Mathematics 10 (2) (1994), 235–240.

[17] Weinberg E.C.,Free lattice-ordered abelian groups, Math. Ann.151(1963), 187–199.

[18] ,Free lattice-ordered abelian groups II, Math. Ann.159(1965), 217–222.

29–305, 3 Xikang Road, Nanjing, 210024, China (Received April 28, 1994)

参照

関連したドキュメント

SIR epidemic model; general incidence rate; time delay; global as- ymptotic stability; Lyapunov functional.. ∗

The proof is arranged as follows. We cannot have both at the same time without λ/μ decaying into two disconnected rectangles.. The best we can obtain is the following.. Suppose we

In the previous section, we revisited the problem of the American put close to expiry and used an asymptotic expansion of the Black-Scholes-Merton PDE to find expressions for

(II) The existence and uniqueness of the solution to the saturated-unsaturated flow model written for di ff usive form of Richards’ equation was proved in the three dimensional case,

Let G be an unperforated partially ordered abelian group such that G + is a finitely generated semigroup and has at least two minimal elements.. Then G + contains a non-zero

Geng, On the critical dimension of a semilinear degenerate elliptic equation involving critical Sobolev-Hardy exponent, Nonlinear Anal.. Gazzola, Existence of solutions for

We classify groups generated by powers of two Dehn twists which are free, or have no “unexpectedly reducible” elements.. In the end we pose similar problems for groups generated

Using the construction of the free product of groups with amalgamated subgroups, we give a sufficient condition for a class of link graphs of Cayley graphs to be closed