凝集粒子を用いた噴煙高度の推定浅間火山2004年9月23日噴火に伴う降下火砕物の堆積様式
20
0
0
全文
(2) ,**. 3 ,- !
(3) . . . . ,**/ - -+ !" ,**/ +* + #$. Using Aggregated Particles to Estimate a Cloud Height Sedimentation Process of the September ,-, ,**., Pyroclastic Fall at the Asama Volcano Eruption Marekazu OHNOῌ, Shuji YAMAKAWAῌ, Masayuki O’ISHIῌῌ, Kou TAKAHASHIῌῌῌ, Tatsuyuki UENOῌῌῌῌ and Takafumi IDAῌ A cloud height generated by a volcanic eruption reflects the immensity and/or magnitude of the eruption ; thus a measuring of the height’s temporal variation during the event is very significant in judging whether the activity will become violent or decline. However, when a volcanic eruption occurs during bad weather, we must take information about the cloud’s height by means of the pyroclastic deposits. In general, the total time taken for pyroclastic materials to be ejected and deposited at a given distance from the source vent can be divided into three parts as follows : the time for the eruption cloud to ascend and reach its neutral buoyancy level (T+) ; the time for the pyroclastic materials to be transported laterally by the eruption cloud (T,) ; and the time for pyroclastic materials to fall and be deposited on the ground (T-). Since T- can be calculated from the settling velocity of pyroclastic materials, if the time that the pyroclastic materials fell at a given locality was observed and a given value for T+ is assumed, the most suitable wind velocity to explain T, can be determined. Thus the height at which pyroclastic materials separate from the eruption cloud can be determined by using the vertical profile of wind velocity around the volcano. These ideas were applied to the eruption occurred at +3 : .. (JST) on September ,-, ,**., at the Asama volcano, which produced a pyroclastic fall deposit with a minimum weight of 1.,%+*0 kg. Because this eruption occurred in bad weather, the pyroclastic materials fell as mud raindrops that were aggregate particles saturated by the rainwater. Based on the depositional mass, the number of impact marks of the mud raindrops in the unit area, and the apparent density and the equivalent diameter of these drops during their fall was estimated to be ,.,ῌ-.+ mm, which is consistent with the grain-size distribution of pyroclastic materials. According to some experienced accounts, mud raindrops several millimeters in diameter fell at ,* : * &+/0ῌ2//* '()*+ -ῌ,/ῌ.* ,-.#-/0123456-6 Department of Geosystem Sciences, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, -ῌ,/ῌ.*, Sakurajosui, Setagayaku, Tokyo +/0ῌ2//*, Japan.. &+3,ῌ*-31 789:;< +ῌ+ =>?@--A#-BC60#6-DE Department of Geography, Tokyo Metropolitan University, +ῌ+, Minamiosawa, Hachioji +3,ῌ*-31, Japan.. &-3*ῌ20*+ F,:G -ῌ+ῌ+ HI--AJ-KBC601LM23456DE Division of Environmental System Sciences, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shinshu University, -ῌ+ῌ+, Asahi, Matsumoto -3*ῌ20*+, Japan.. &0/1ῌ2/*+ NO:P)QRST +ῌ+ NO--AUV6-BC601WX23456 -DE Department of Earth and Planetary System Sciences, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University, +ῌ+, Rokkodai-cho Nadaku, Kobe 0/1ῌ 2/*+, Japan. YZ[ : &+/0ῌ2//* '()*+ -ῌ,/ῌ.* ,-.#-/UV6-BCZ Present : The Institute of Natural Sciences, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, -ῌ,/ῌ .*, Sakurajosui, Setagayaku, Tokyo +/0ῌ2//*, Japan. Corresponding author : Marekazu Ohno e-mail : [email protected].
(4) )BµOsj¶·s)<¸ks¹ ºsBlksu[»¼. 536. in the Kitakaruizawa area (about 3 km north-northeast from the source). Assuming ,ῌ/ minutes for T+ and ++./ῌ+,.* m/s of average lateral wind velocity, the height at which the mud raindrops separated from the eruption cloud can be estimated at -,.-*ῌ-,20* m (-,0+* m on average). From this conclusion, the transportation and depositional process of the pyroclastic materials generated on September ,-, ,**., at the Asama volcano can summarized as follows : the explosion occurred at +3 : .. and the eruption cloud rose to -,0+* m while blowing ,..3 km downwind from the source. The cloud moved laterally for ../+ km with generating raindrops. At +3 : /., mud raindrops separated from the cloud 1.* km north-northeast from the source, then fell to the ground at ,* : *- after being blown ,.* km downwind by a lateral wind. Key words : cloud height, pyroclastic fall deposit, mud raindrops, sedimentation process, the Asama volcano. p&m9
(5) b0 PQfG !! . + .
(6) . ! v! " 8 . !. R> ,**. S 3 ,- TH$g5. (Wilson et al., +312 ; Woods, +322)"
(7) . 67$ AP> R !" U F . #$ %!&'( ). I[BV|} 2$ PV1$ :. '*
(8) +,- " ./$, . J
(9) R"9EW$. 01 2 34#$ 56$,7. + :J fGR" !. 8+9:; <= >) '?'. N! ". @ +-AB9C>D',('EFG>H $I,J 2 34#$ K . ,
(10) . >6! 8+) 'LM9 "
(11) 9C. Fig. + W ('/ X,. >D',EFG>H$ 01 2 34#$. J R" b0s !Y. N! @ O 'PQ+' 9. %$> " / X, 01 . J R !"> " Carey and Sparks (+320) R !" #$%!4. &S ' #$ &+'
(12) .
(13) / ZW|)[jk! |>'7 ZW|)[jk ! ¡|W¢ ^Sparks et al., +331 ; t[sA ,**/aa. T@ UVW(X$" 8 UVW
(14). +$\£>D " ¡|W¢|\). +YZ )[ *9+1*,-.\/. []- ZW| 9¤ ,8+ *,. ])! ^_`a
(15) b0 c142. ->^$¡|W¢ ¥YZ )[ ¥+. &'R"9 2 d e34>fG !$g5. ¦§_¨', +©- " 2 01 ¡|. I,67>D " $$ h8iG>9H. W¢*,-.\>b0 R". $01 jk R"b0l9>. YZ` I J /b0 +~. &m:n9op$ ;<4=qE>fG !! 8. '!8+9>D ". +9>, ^+-r?@sA +32, ; tu +33- ; )Bs. 8 ('¡|W¢R"9b0sa. A +33/a" 2 @ h8iG>H$I,. PQfG! 01 ª« 0yR. Carey and Sparks (+320) 7,LC . "9fG !! > ! .
(16) v! 8+w@D$," 8 $ Hx+ y zEf G$R" &S+fG9#, r R " e34+F GYH I J{sJ 4 * V|}K~1 8+
(17) . T+ :
(18) 9$ *,-^! b ! " T, :
(19) *,->b0 R". 9 ¬PJ/b0 " T- :
(20) EW$R"9 PQc^! b. ! ". R"9#E$ !'
(21) !. Vd+$Q (Fig. +)" zEE . PL 8+9>D " 28>MN> op. P- &S R"9fG! $9. &m ^=qa !EF+ ! op&m fG. #, 01 T- R" e34>D. , &SO ! " F . @ ®¯*° R" fGef!. G J{sJ4! I[BV|}+op&. ±J6g'²³ IR"/b0 . m fG, &S e347, o. h 'J49´i " F I J{s.
(22) klz{E1,- 24 p ,**. 3 ,- , 8c^tu . 537.
(23) . X+Y7 LZ [\]^5_`01, abc. !"#. ^ de5fghcij0Ikl0. $%&'( )* +,-./. mnopqr#sIc^tuvw+xyC. 01 2+34567 )8. T+, T,, T- +9. 5Y1 c^Tklz{z|>}~5. :3456; +,<=>? @A. 0#H;##E7 L1 [\]^5_`01,. BCDE.1FG5,-./0 9. F& ,-+56#E7 )sI , sI. ?>HIJKL5MN01+34567 00#+ OPQR SQT , UVW. 1,-+2TXL5N (T+) 34+b#E7. Fig. +. Schematic illustration showing the transportation process of the eruption cloud resulting from the short-lived eruption (i.e., vulcanian explosion). The total time for the pyroclastic materials to deposit from the start of the eruption is the summation of T+, T,, and T-. When the adequate range of T+ has been assumed, we can obtain information about the eruption cloud’s height. For detailed explanations, see the text..
(24) 538. ®¯ G°±²³G´µ¶GC· ¸G ®ῑ¶G¹º»¼.
(25) T+ ῏. zk!no!~! n, /010.
(26)
(27) T+ ΐ!"#$. no{!ῒ W
(28) /><!U 4. !%&'( )*+ *, -. /01!. !k῏_ ;. 23!4
(29) 54%!67ῐ8!9ῐ:;<=;> /!?@AB
(30) CD!EFGEA
(31) HIJK!LM. Sn · W. (+). 540"NO!"PQ;<!RSTU VWX*. no!ῒu῎ w H
(32) (+) no!;q. Y
(33) ;<"NO῍Z0CB . [\
(34). B s no!54%!-: d 1
(35) 4! . ῌ&]!TU ^_ T+ `abcdefYT
(36). ¡Y ;. "NO!;<!῍ZCBg!hBde; i j0
(37) Ik#lm ;<!"NO!῍ZCB!b. + + S pd- · n · s +¢w 0. (,). c . ,ῌ+
(38) . £¤
(39) 54%Hqno!-: d 4!;. no (Mud raindrops) p$
(40) 54%H. <¥<> ;. q/!ῐ: 9rs t. nouv0 wx54yz67{ (Sparks et al., +331) k
(41) L|540}!~I154%!w. +. ῌ ῏ ῎ ῑ0S dῌ ῍ ῎)+¢w,psnῑ ῍. ῐ. (-). f>10
(42) yz w!W;<54%!ῐ:. zk540no!
(43) #L¦§T. 0 . / (+) no!w. ¨©054"NyzO! w!ª«;<ῒ.
(44) (,) LM540no!:
(45) .
(46) no!ῒu῎;qB I. , _!- H
(47) zk540"NO. k
(48) no!54%!-:¬.. !yzῒ
(49) zk!no!~! 1
(50) 54%Hq/!: . "NO!zk!yzῒ )ῒ, S, . ,ῌ,. . 54%!no!ῐ:
(51) !ῐ:;q. Fig. ,. Schematic illustration showing how to estimate the time for the pyroclastic material to fall from a given height..
(52) $% &&<V»¼¼ 4+\v ,**. 2 3 t ,- 3\6d1)\b%*+(4 ¼¼. 539.
(53) . + *+ (T , LT -) 0+\b%. . X. P" [ (D,LD-) '='\b%1. !"# $%. )!*k"#l
(54)
(55) Nmn. &'
(56) ( ) *+. l,- op.!W uave i FIuave HH. ,(- T- ". q( \/*r)0&<. Fig. , )./ 0
(57) " 1. )*+2345!67 , ,89. uave i FIuave HH 9 s1"# V \b%!q. :;< => ?:@ A"# +BC D r E). - ,**. 3 ,-
(58) . 4 FG +32.H ;. -ῌ+. rIJ. Kpi piJpiL+ IJ gKzi gFziJziL+H. ,**. 3 ,- +3 .. . ,**. 2 3 t ,- 3 +3 * .. u 4+\v5w x (.). y6d\78!
(59) \ ,**/ 2 2 t z{ ,**. 2 3 t + 3/(4+\v ,**. 2.
(60)
(61) Kpi 89 , +:M Kzi 0. \ |97\ F}97~H P". M7 , ,NMOGP<=. ,**. 2 3 t + 3 ,* * *, : ,3 3 +, * +1 0!. > + QRS1). ++ t +. 3 ,* * /3 n;:( | 99. T9
(62)
(63) => 7. U'. 7S,P"< F< ,**.a, ,**.bH !!.
(64) 1) ( *+ T- E. 9
(65) \ =+ ,178!. )4" ;. V>? @<A<Q9< B C. ῍. Kzi ῎῏ῌ vi. ῎῏ῌ. "\/*( \78. ῍. T-Iῐ tiIῐ. (/). D 1 Z +3 * /+ u \]EFD . km !G= FFig. . OnH B)U.
(66)
(67) H V! ti +. # \v1)! P\78D +3. BC 1)*+ 0! vi +BC. Z ,* * *- u \]EEFD 3 km H. 7. IJKEL FFig. . KkH B). 1) + WX. U ,- mm $% &1)!
(68) $% & Z. P" + SY!. d \v$%
(69) 8. A 7 V!. 7
(70) \ 1 4+\vEEF. Z
(71) "# (+Y! [ D-. D -2 km H M N¡K¢O;P. (Fig. +) E)4" ;. FFig. . SmH £QP"Q \]EEF © ( . ῍. D-Iῐ Fti · uave iH ῎῏ῌ. (0). D 3+ km " ¤ ¥ R ¦ § ¨ S K FFig. . YmH D ,0* km "v_ v_¨ FFig. . YgH ª! ¬.
(72)
(73) uave i +D7
(74) D- \. PD ,3* km "v_ F «¨ FFig. . HgH. ][M!^<$ V. p£QP" F< ,**.a ; T®U ,**/H. ! 9. -ῌ, . P_` a9 \b% V. V¯ \B0 2 *+Z 3 t ,. 3°W /. ( VcY! 0Y!. * -* u:3 +0 *±²(B0 ++ *+ z. [ D, (Fig. +) VY! D uave H. X³´ X³ 4+\vEEFY µZ. &<E)deC ;. \][D /..,/ km [´< ., ¶. D,IT, · uave H. (1a). ' 1Nm! 0!1\]< © 1)**+QR^_P"< `a!. V'(fg *+ (T+) . ,< Sb+7-1)!\b%. * h (1a) 4 i(e )j ;. ·¸! cb+7-1)\¹ @Nm. D,IFTtotalJT-H · uave H. (1b). V'(X P"\b%
(75) 1)*. B< \vded1) UQR^ º!((*+!<. & Q"9 Fig. - ,**. 2 3 t ,- 3 +3 * .. u\p.
(76) 540. ±²o³%´µ¶³±>·¸³¹ º³(¸³»¼.
(77) . %&*AM hij ]G1<cWX. /..1 km . Y$34*k5lmnJKL . !"#$%&'( )* + cm +. L5 op6 (qrsL9. ,-./!01234567# 28-. !:j WXY$34tuv^5 )* + cm. 9 !:# (Fig. -a) ;34< !". UVbcd w e86?- (Fig. -d). #=>?@A BFig. -a CD 5 EFGH. ;rsL9 xEK y-z. 8 I;34*JK. {5 |
(78) }e8WXY$34t. LM 1 km NO P2QRSTLKL. uv^!~w iT2. 1 km N(2 $%&. & 5 | . ()* , mm UVWXY $345Z[\]A-. 328-)Le8 . ]G^567#28-9 L (Fig. -b, -c). % 1.0 km #= B. )* , mm UVWXY$34_` aLK. 333 mD 2.. km # ¡¢ B. bcd $%&`Ae8 (Fig. -b, -c) . +,,-* mD £¤¥¦§?¨8 3 © ,- ª ,*. 2 ]G1_`!fMgK$. ¥z5« (¬9 ®¯. Fig. -. Occurrence of the pyroclastic fall deposits derived from the eruptions at +3 : .., September ,-, ,**., at the Asama volcano. The distance of each locality from the source is shown as follows : a, 0., km ; b, ++.* km (locality of “III” in Fig. . and Table +) ; c, 2.0 km (locality of “I” in Fig. . and Table +) ; and d, +*.- km. By 1 km from the source, the pyroclastic fall deposit included lapilli, some several cm in diameter, which overlay fine ash particles (a). These lapilli contained a few amounts of pumice grains. Beyond 1 km° from the source, the deposit showed black angular conglomerates (°, mm) surrounded by finer grains (°+** mm) with a light brown color (b, c). The grain size of these conglomerates systematically decreased as the distance from the source increased. In some localities, raindrop marks were observed on the surface of the deposit (d)..
(79) _R,`Wº»6¼¼
(80) ,**. 9 3 , ,- ! c ¼¼. 541.
(81) . N(2) c SnO d!! ,/0 gῌm,. . !"m!oO! mmax.
(82) ! " . g{h! ,/0 gῌm qrs|Y}~. ! #$!% &&'(. ; 9!%&+ ijk!%`. )*)* +. *! B 1.,+*0 kg N1,,** ?rO ". -ῌ- . (,3, g/m,). ,. + 9hH_!l,,` x'. Fig. . 3 , ,- +3 .. -! . !m>,,` Q"9 .C6. !"#. + $!% /%%. onh. + 6 9!XdT (,**/) . &'0!()12+ 3' 45(. h NB 2,/** ?rO !3n)hm 9T. *.67+8*"9 4. XdT (,**/) Xo%7. 5,:") /()3-;< ./&. W!f 9 pqd. %7!=>? 01)* + *2 /(@A. T (,**,) jkW%7x'! . 3B456%C78D &2 /(@A. !!f!p 9! . ! ,**. 9 3 , + ,* *, :;<!=>. p* +. /E?8 F@!(@AG. !"#. -ῌ.
(83) Fig. / ,**. 9 3 , ,- +3 .. -&. 9A>"+. ! HB 0 km %%&!I. )*,:(.. + ,:( ../ f. C JKLDEFGM NFig. . : FjO 1.,. NQ: .. mmO 6c ../ f %7,"r. km %%&!IC. !2 57Q?. HIPM<QRSTJ. NFig. . : SzO 6UK&!V/ + . *., wt.ῒ sQs:!tuv wx. ! HW% 3.. km %%&!I. yzW[
(84) ,`);X 4ss . C JKLDEFLM NFig. . : TtO 36N. { d |kW,:(}~C N¡. OX HUKK* !2*YZV/!P. SALD--***SO WB +. f (*.*0 mm) ,:6}. [ + 9!\O?] J . + ../ f , 2". +3 X!Q: ,^- mm _R,` J. ,:(*¢* !8 £W. UK (3 km) ab$[.. 8 }¤TOD . 9 9!. 'kWG. \O&W% +3 X!'S)*. ,:( O¥4! *^,f (+^*.,/ mm) l. D +. ,2 -^/f (+,2^-, mm) ,2! , 2¦s. Fig. . !"# ! M (2) c NOMdT ,**, c3UeVO Wf ;. ῏ + ῌ῎῏ῌ Mg ῎ῑ hSi · Nmiimii+OjihSn · NmnimmaxOjῑ (2) , ῍῍ῐῌ ῐ. §12¨u¦s©ª"(m+ Fig. / !m, :(«o&¬H! 0.* km ®)* t ,,`:!Q: + cm 645J] (Fig. -a) ®)*&. + % 9 tX>,:( )!l,2!OD"¦s. 99 S , X !"!k6* Y m . §&201)* + ¯i°6p Fig. / . l !"mZIY.7 !. ± *^, f &C)!l,2!IC ¦s§. mmax n+)*oO ! n. HUKK* !2*²4!,2!. 2 gῌm, . =>? 2¦s§ !8 £V/. !" ,/0 gῌm, . !"6[. pX[. + (2) c Fig. . !"#!\W !.7 . -^/ f !IC ,2¦s§UKV. !"][" 2 W%Z +0 gῌm,. ³&ICaQ´V³"+ . qrs qrstur"8!v^ 9. µ l,2¦s§, /i!. !%(Y+ H 0 km % 7_!!w `*"8. 45&C_R :!.. \l,¶ ^ 45. ! 6,2¦s§9\l,¶^457. +,2 gῌm, qrs66"8!H6. ·C%!( ¸^¸ ,. v^+ 6 2 gῌm, abqrsx'y. /!*¢*¹ )* +. =6.67!&ODC" 8 !f cv+ )!odz !"!ef. ,/0 gῌm,.
(85) 542.
(86) . Fig. .. An isopleth map of the pyroclastic fall deposit that accompanied with the eruption which occurred in September ,-, ,**. at the Asama volcano. This map also shows localities where the diameters of mud raindrops were estimated (I, II, and III on this map). The pyroclastic fall deposit distributes in a north to northeast direction and has a secondary thickening at about 3 km away from the source. The amount of the deposit within the isopleth contour of 2 g/m, is estimated to about 1.,+*0 kg. The meanings of the abbreviations in this map are as follows, Hg : Higashine city (Yamagata Prefecture), Yg : Yamagata city (Yamagata Pref.), Ym : Yamato town (Niigata Pref.), Sm : Shima Hot Spring (Gunma Pref.), Wj : Wajima weather station (Ishikawa Pref.), Tt : Tateno, Kk : Kitakaruizawa, Sz : Suzuranzaka crossroad, Fj : Fujiwara, On : Onioshidashien park..
(87) µ¶'·+2QR¸¸ ABCD ,**. 3 ,- Cp¹Cmº»(¼ ¸¸. Fig. /. Grain-size distribution of pyroclastic deposits derived from the eruptions that occurred on September ,-, ,**. at the Asama volcano. The distribution is bimodal, showing one grain size that is of a coarse mode, *ῌ, phi (+ῌ*.,/ mm in diameter), and another of a finer mode, -ῌ/ phi (+,2ῌ-, mm in diameter). With increasing distance from the source, the coarser mode migrates toward finer fractions, whereas the finer one is fixed.. 543. Fig. 0. A surface synoptic chart at ,+ : ** (JST) on September ,-, ,**.. A stationary front was stagnating south of Japan, and an atmospheric ridge expanded to the Kanto area from a high atmospheric pressure existing southeast of Hokkaido. This atmospheric pattern indicated that, in the Kanto area, the surface wind direction was north-northeast and its velocity was weak.. I4(t [. 3 ,- C. -ῌ/ . * #V' 0 2QR
(88) . -ῌ/ῌ+ . U
(89) (t8@
(90) +?
(91) . Fig. 0 ,**. 3 ,- ,+
(92). Fig. 1 ,**. 3 ,- ,+ |[\] [. 3 ,- ,+ . S@+2quvwx78#+ . !"# $%&'(. * J#_
(93) *. )* %+ ,+ - ./0 12. *78't+ 2( #. 3 ' 42356789 *:
(94) 3.
(95) |[\] 2/* hPa 2 +,/./.
(96) ; !"#+ 4
(97) ;<= 8> 3 . m 1** hPa 2 -,+0* m /** hPa 2 /,2.* m. >?8@+4(78 ABCDEFG. J# -** hPa 2 3,0+* m
(98) 4@8. .HI 423(J478K:
(99) 3. T2q 78#+ABCD2(.
(100) ;78*7%LMNF<. O.
(101) 4(78 ABCDu . P#+(QRS@
(102) CTU>I 3 ,-. |[\] 8@+[¡(¢M&£=
(103) 4(=(. ,* VW
(104) XYZ[\]*^_.^. t
(105) Fig. 1 h
(106) ( ( 277. +.- mῌs, ,+`abcdeJ@fg^* mῌs '. ¤8¥(¦§¨# 44(78 C¢. 78h(@
(107) *)*(i#= #. 782 +* km I, (¦§©!"#. 7#= 8 4*. *jklC. +4( 7
(108) _I #ª 2q. m (Fig. .) (no#=4(78 4C. §«&=
(109) )* * 782 +01. pCm j(#2qr%sS@+(. m , <9¬. (Fig. 0) 78. t
(110) . h(@
(111) $(i#= 2 2,1 m ,. -ῌ/ῌ,
(112) . *2 ®(_«?= 8'.
(113) 2quvwx . 9 *¯°±
(114) 2 +,/./ m 78 1,/.* m ,. yz{|}
(115) u~|[\] (Fig.. *78² +3*¬,,/ ,'. .) [S@+vwx+ 4@2qu[. 9789%³ ' R
(116) ABCD. %
(117) (#|[\] U>ABCD. D´ &2 ,,/0* m U>I- -,+0* m .
(118) 544. I4³b´µI¶@· ¸¹4A@ºB»¼ Table +. The results of the equivalent diameter of mud raindrops estimated by equation (-). On the assumption of ,*῍,/ wt.ῌ of water content and ,,,**῍,,,2* kg/m- of apparent density, the mud raindrops ranged from ,., to -.+ mm in diameter.. Fig. 1. A vertical profile of wind velocity, temperature, and dew-point temperature obtained at the Wajima weather station at ,+ : ** (JST) on September ,-, ,**.. The additional number beside the wind velocity is the wind direction. The temperature and dew-point temperature show no significant di#erence regardless of changing height, indicating that the air was saturated with water at the time of the eruption.. <=>?9(D 0 9( D9# D . +- mῌs
(119) . C ,*7,/ wt.ῌ iB20oj MI4 +33/N. `GTa@ yb C$ -!>?9(z!{| (5 }/~$G "#. HU #V7WXYD0_/W#*^ 0y C${|9(s0 .9 +* cm, 6! 0y1?( C <=!9( <= C iB20
(120) 9(3 . Fig. 1 . 9(*+ !B059 +!*6. +* mῌs 1,/.* m. C09(
(121) 37( M,,7,/.
(122) !"# $%&'. wt.ῌ ; Schumacher and Schmincke, +33/ -+ wt.ῌ ;. () *+ $,-./. 01. +33-N !x ' D 89 B. ' 3 2 ,- *!3 4./5. !9(C iB2 w 0 ,*7,/ wt.ῌ B :. ,,/0* m 1,/.* m 607. 0 +,*** kgῌm- D9#C0¡|'*+ ¢:. !"#89( . 0 ,,0** kgῌm- P 9# C K: s 0£. -ῌ0 . = ¤0G#9( ;. -῍, :;(<=*+ >?@A *+ B. !9(C9#<=>?9( D. s¥w · rw¦Wp · rp. (3). ,῍+ !E9(F0G# >? HI 6. rw B : Wp C"!ik*+ . ! MFig.. 2 D9# rp *+ ¢: (3) ¤. . " ῌ! ῍! ῎!N 0O 9 C <=" PQ. C K: ,,,**7,,,2* kgῌm- ?5. <C 0JK#G.GL #R0S)(. *+ Fig. -b, -c !E9(T! HU#V7W XY Z60[\]7$\] W#*^$_6`. iB2C K: 0 (-) ¤!§; 9 C <=r R 60S)( Table + Fig. . "!E9( -. !d_(e&. GTa@0E' b% *c 2.2 km !d_. !x9 ¤ (-) 0G#S)(C PQR. (e& WXY'(!f)gG#R #h. ,῍+ F0G#S)(C PQR ,.,7-.+. 0i` (Fig. /) jk #R C$5j*. mm 6 *+ #R. l+.#R0,m'1n T.#. (Fig. /) ¨5U#.#R©ª«¬®<¯D. R0ojC$ -!<=>?9(pq W##h. I-G *+ #R >?. >?r st!"#C" Bu!g/v'. @A =°9.G. $ U##hwx+!g/v9.G.Q. -ῌ1
(123) . jk HU#V7WXY Z60W#*^$_6. -῍/῍, E9(T! >? ±² ( ,**..
(124) ·¸ῐ8\]B3¹'ºº. !"# ,**. 3 ,- 3"5»¥HI"EFs¼V ºº. 545. 3 ,- ,+
(125) . =:lm ~$ 2/* hPa S_2 $. !". &wJJ&DB/. #$%&'()&*+,-./ 01211. -ῌ2 (T-)
(126). 2 3"4567 !"#$%
(127). -ῒ0 56]Z " O 3 km ~5sDB. 8ῒ9:;<567=:>2?@A/ BCD ". HI8 ,.,-.+ mm &DB/ 1ῐ. EFGHIDBJKLMNO +,+** m 2PB. 5 P ῐ ῍ ῏ T Re /** ;. Q JKLM%R' ῒ9:;<2=:B. Bonadonna et al., +332U 8 ¡DhG%8HI.. 2/* hPa S T' +,/./ mU & 3*/ hPa S T' +,*+- mU. BQ ῐ&¢£'&!5¤X¥h().
(128) 8 (.) V5?W.1&5XYZDB/. G¡^῎ TB&|¦ Sparks et al., +331U ;. Table , [ΐ2\]B3"4. !"#$%.
(129) 8&^_&QB`2P/ abcd8 e.& (.) V JKLMfg%R' +.*/.. +. ῌ ῎. Ts¨aUgd῏ ῑ, Vt§ῌ · ῍ · a C ῎ ῑ D ῍ ῐ. (+*a). kgῌm- &h^ 51%R' iJK. 112 a %R' g ©ῑª' 0DZ CD «. LMej 230 hPa &h/ 1>JKLMX. ¬)2P/ ῍῏8 ¡DhGῌI. ῐ. ^ N G k ] K L M : ; < ,+ = : l m. ®¯ CD ῐῐ6X°%R'±²5. (3*2.- hPa) &noDh]BQ pqrs`YBJKLM. (³^hx66X0 *..1 ´'>8& TB&|¦. %R'> tu>&vwxyhz&. µ +322U/ XYZ©ῑª'8 3.2+ mῌs &.¦ (+*. h]&{|/ ,} ~@fg5]Z ~@. a) V¶IX¥5_&Q1&G2w ;. S54BN +,+** m 8 5XYZ * mῌs &D 2/* hPa S567=:lm&c>8 &YB/ 5~$ (Fig. 0) KLM:;<. ῌ ῎Ts¨aU Vt§/.,2ῌ ῎ ῍ a. +. ῏ ῑ, · d῍ ῑ ῐ. Table ,. The upper meteorological air data around the Asama volcano and the settling velocities of the mud raindrops calculated from these data.. (+*b).
(130) z®¯°±²³´±zEµ¶±· ¸±/®ῐ¶±¹º»¼. 546. Fig. 2. The relationship between the height at which the mud raindrops separated from the eruption cloud and the time at which they fell on to the ground (T- ; Fig. +). In consideration of the height of the Asama volcano summit and some experienced accounts, the estimated range of heights at which the mud raindrops separated is represented as the gray area in this diagram.. (+*b) -ῌ0
(131) . Fig. 2 G| ,.,-.+ mm 1<
(132) (23. ῏ ,.,-.+. 6v 458 (T -) 1 5. mm !"# $%&'( . ~# 1<
(133) (ῌ6. )*+,
(134) ( (/) -.%/0 ῏ 1. 1. 23v6 81
(135)
(136) . 23456 768 9Fig. + T-: *. " Fig. 2 II G 1῍F#. # ; <=
(137) ( 1 >?=@
(138) (A . km 2BC. <1i῍B6 768 * u. (D'<EF.%G $ >HI1=JKLMN. %ij =JM 458 9+3 >: =. O >H I
(139) (P'%.&
(140) ( GQ;. (,,/0* m) j . RS%.TUV1.# WX% YZ [\]^. 6G Fig. 2 i ¡¢£gv'ῑ¤.
(141) (G_6#. 6;¥¦ ,,/0*.,-/* m fg;#. <=`8 a bcGd
(142) ( % +3*e,,/e fg h%. (Fig. 1)# WX% 1i45. -ῌ3.
(143) . 6jklD'mῌ D- G 23nopqaG. -ῌ2 .% *D' \ . 145irrs 9A ,*/e: tc
(144) ( b῎D'. -.%<
(145) ( =JM ῌ fg§. u% (0) -.%)*# v YZw. # &&GD(<1=JMkl6 7. D'fgxyC. 1z{;C G ,,,2*. 8 (T, : Fig. +) ¨!" $'©. kgῌm | -.+ mm $%yC 1}D. ª«*D' 23v 458 (T - : Fig.. -. .C G ,,,** kgῌm- | ,., mm ~&. +) L*6&W <
(146) ( ῌ.
(147) ( j2345 G& fg6. ¬A# ; &&C<1i῍B6. C ;% T- fg#. 768 (T+ : Fig. +) G * u6#.
(148) ¶·ῐ¸¹T3 ,Sºº k.l ,**. ³ 3 ´ ,- µ»&',()8¼ ºº. 547. Fig. 3. The relationship between the height at which the mud raindrops separated from the eruption cloud and the time at which they hit the ground. Combining some experienced accounts and results obtained from Fig. 2, we estimate the range of heights at which the mud raindrops separated to have been -,//*ῌ-,2/* m.. Fig. 3 ῍
(149) . ῎ !"#$%&'() *+,-. !/0 T, T- ,12"34,+56 Fig. 3 4 Fig. 2 78. . . .
(150) . .ῌ+. I,I 3 ῎<. ῍
(151) 9!:;$%. *+ῌ -. (T +) * S. < ,ῌ -.=9!3> ?+ῑ@. ! $%&'() ,ῌ. ,.A,BCDE῎F6. ! $%GH. -. +3 . #T6. ῌ`!T1 I>3. IJKLMN,OOPQRS #T3> U. *+ῌ 3-.3e + +5"3. ,VTΐW (X,,.** m) +Y,BC!6 Fig. 2 . #4 w,. I FFQn"#῏`. 78 Fig. 3 ,Z[,,&'-.C \]. a Q' Fig. + , D+6. 3"# . Fig. 2 ^_`a3,῍
(152) ,bcC. ,I-.d 31 -ῌ3 +S 3,. \]de Fig. 2 Z[,,&'-.f. ,῍
(153) qN9 56 n"#. 3 gh῍
(154) _ +,0** m _ -,//*i-,2/* m ,. oo+ I 3 *+ῌ . j@k.l,lmnEVT. -. (T +) !bc+`3- ,῍
(155). o Z[,gh1/!T6 n"# ,(. ;,n , nEZH. )ῒ,pqrsEt. T,῍
(156) ,bcS 6. bc!6. 3U -,//*i-,2/* m. ,bc &' 3ueav w,&'-xyz -,{|gh}~!9+N6. .ῌ+ῌ+. . !"#$%&. '( )*+,,-./ ¡ (,**/a, ,**/b) {|¢£n¤P¥q¦$ §¨©?k.lª«¬ #T®¯°±² `a3 ,**- ³ , ´ 0 µ £n¤ ,**. ³ 3 ´ +/ i +2.
(157) 548. sC²6³´µ6s¶·D6]¸ ¹6CED6º
(158) »¼.
(159)
(160) . . (Scorer,. +3/1)
(161) ! "# $%& '. (! )*+, +ῌ, -
(162) . /0123 4
(163) 5
(164) 67 (,**/a, ,**/b) 8! %$ 39 :;<=>! ? %&@@1 2( AB212+, ! ,**- , C 0 D<8 ,/ ! ,**. 3 C +/E+2 . %& / @D<8 /* E+,* F3& G&H
(165) 9I J! ,**- , C 0 8K L( .** MNOP Q5
(166) 67! ,**/aR 3S%&T U! VWI Q1,,** MNR X82YZ%[ 3Y$! ,**. 3 C ,- ( ,**- , C 0 X\U]^_"
(167) 38,` [a[ _ ! ,**. 3 C +. E+2 b
(168) Kcd( /3,*** MN Qe 6 7! ,**/R 3S%&[2(! &8f,g
(169) h. i Q0aj3# ,,*+* W ; kl! ,**.aR m nP
(170) K <o
(171) "p2 ,**. 3 C +. E+2 8q
(172) rsta(u%& [a[ Qkl! ,**.aR 3Y$123! ,**. 3 C ,- 8! 5
(173) 6 7 (,**/b) (vUw / @ I xy ,**. 3 C +. E+2 gz { | X! (\U]^_" }
(174) ~!(] [ OY$! ""8(
(175) Y$#A12. Fig. +*. The relationship between an average lateral wind velocity and the height at which the mud raindrops separated from the eruption cloud. Assuming ,ῌ/ minutes of T+ and +*ῌ,* m/s of average lateral wind velocity, we find that an average lateral wind velocity of +-ῌ+. m/s corresponds to the real wind velocity described in Fig. 1 (the gray area in this diagram). Considering +* m/s of wind velocity near the Asama volcano summit, we find that the actual lateral wind velocity should average a value ranging from the average lateral wind velocity (+-ῌ+. m/s) to the wind velocity near the summit (+* m/s), or ++./ῌ+, m/s. The height at which the mud raindrops separated from the eruption cloud is therefore estimated to range from -,.-* to -,2** m. See the text for a detailed discussion.. 12+, (T+) P ! ,**. 3 C +/E+2 $%"p2 , &312 '! Y$ +3 &. 6(7~!a] (1,/.* m) '8 ,* mῌs. 8K(nP
(176) [23! 12\! ( . ,3a2 ""8! 12(2?. (Y$)
(177) ! *+nP1212+, (T-). 3 'F +* mῌs Y$ ,* mῌs 3
(178) ! . 8! (/) \U +* &,3H%&2 (Fig. ++a) 3Y. 3 '3K)] ¡ ¢8
(179) . $! (
(180) Y$K(Y$)12_" 12+, (T+T,) 8%j# +* &,3$&. .ῌ+ῌ,.
(181) . 2 T, \U T+ '(%ja238j[ B! . Fig. +* 8?£($2? 3. "8 T + / &312 OY$! . ' ! ¤£83 ' 9¥%> +H%&. \mK('-%&! *+nP12_". 2Y$( )] 3U! &$ ¡ T+. +, (T,T-) 8 +.E+1 &3a2. ,E/ &! ( :¦ ,.,E-.+ mm,
(182) §Y. T+ ,E/ &F"
(183) D<! ($. 0 ,,,**E,,,2* kgῌm- F"oH
(184) 4. ? \m P aj) (D+ : Fig. +) #..
(185) p2 T+ (%ja2¨©! ( -6cd%>2. @ 8OP\mH%&2 ; D+T+ · uave V. (++). " uave V 8! (/Y$0$12}12. 12+,8;ja2 B! ( (Y$)1 2]8<ja28ª"p2 Fig. +* §23! ? 3 '( +-./ m ῌ s =>?«"8@¬AU® 41
(186) Y
(187) ! ? 3 '( +-./ m ῌ s Oa2. _"2? ' 3
(188) "p2 QOP! . 3! T+ 3( Y$)] ¡8¯B12. ' . 3 ' 3R Fig. 1 ;23! . &8! T+ °±m D+ (%ja2&! D, 3 D- . ,45T2 '8 +* mῌs, _ K&. <o)(;ja2 B! ]^Y$K nP%>a.
(189) ·¸-¹G47(* '$ºº p
(190) Cq ,**. 5 3 » ,- 6C7gCj'¼8 ºº. 549.
(191) +.+1 . ' %#'NO% W+. . ! x Cj'("#')* %#. . ! Fig. +* "#$% . +,% . -,-1*.,,+* m + ". Fig. +* G +! &'- G +. ! Fig. 1 ,*-' .+! (/0 1. ! ,., mm, i" ,,,** kgῌm- z. &'("#')*.
(192) 2 .3456789:7: ;< . {|! T+ '
(193) 1 ] '
(194) 2 .G.% :. 7 =>?@A'/0. ! 5B CD/. F! iF# &'("#')* '¡ 5. EF.! /0GH * I3J KL. :F ,/* m / + "#! &'-. +79! M'. NOPQR@GST UV!. *.3 mm ¢ £F! #'("#')*. ,**/a ; ,**/b WX! . *-YZ[7 (Fig. 1). '¡ ! 57¤. /** m ¥ T34&. \9:! /0 (] \9:^ _. ("#) *. ! T + ] '[%'87\. (D+). ! (' I' .\9:Y`. a3 bc! &("#)* ! (/0 EFdeG1 .I7 f . 4! ¦§&'i" ' '-'. [deG1 +7 .ῌ+ῌ-. W'\gh Fig. 1 + Fig. +* Gi +! ("# 'Cj')* 'k * -,-1*.,,+* m 'k*-' .+
(195) 2 .Y`l ' !. . +-+. mῌs 'k+ W'm. (T+)
(196) (T,) (D-). (/0 1 ] '
(197) 2 .G ++./+, mῌs. (/0. + +! Fig. +* "#$% &')* '. deG1. .'/no ! p
(198) Cqq. /n ! -.+ mm, i" ,,,2* kgῌm- '&. I' . +* mῌs (Fig. 1) W+"#! <r'. . +, m ῌ s ' , ": 3/0.
(199) 2 .W' .'k"#5Ks tu . ("#{|! 3'n ! ,.,. 7 \9: ! ! p
(200) CqqI' . (+* m/s). mm, i" ,,,** kgῌm- '& . ++./ mῌs '. +/v' .+
(201) 2 .Y`l. . (+-+.. / ": 3/0("#. m/s) +'
(202) 2G+9 . ++./+, mῌs ! (/. {|+ \9:! (^ '. 0 1
(203) 2 ] 'kGY`"w +x!.
(204) T,. y W'
(205) 2 .'k+ Fig. +* "#! ('/0
(206) G ,/ +z{|! &'("#') * 'k. -,.-*-,2** m + }/"#! &. Fig. ++a. /¨''k0 f /¨'$% T, + T- '©ªG. ,F' T+ G ,/ +{|! T, + T- ' 1. +.+1 + \9:! <r'
(207) +3 . ("#)* ! T34^ (#$. G2{|! T, '/nm ! T+ G , +:«. '~%'* ! W'iF4x"#p
(208) Cq'q. < T, + T- '1 +1 + +'¬! 3. '&* (,,/0* m) G7* ! bc 21* . T, 'nm ! T+ G / +:«3! T, + T-. +,,.* m +$ W+ . '1 +. + +'¬. f W'. T+ G ,/ +z:iF9&'("#'. G {¤ ! T- + '{¤+ +* '{. ! T + G * +z{|'$m (-,//*. ¤+ ! &'®¯. G2 +! °± ². )*. -,2/* m) +Y`'sm+9 W ! /0 (. . 7 \9: Fig. ++a "#! T - 'k. (% ! Cj'("#')*. ! : T, 'k. G deGo +# (/0. W+ . 1 ] '
(209) 2 .G ++./+, mῌs +{|! (++) "#)# D + 'k. +,-2*-,0** m +. WX! ('~%'/0* "#! (. 21*+,,.* m. 3.,+*.,. ..20.2 +³$. T- 'ka3 +! 'k0Cj . Z'/ ^(% '"« Fig. ++b ! /¨'«% T- + D- '©ªG, . ,*[' ]*4. /´'µ!a T- 'k 3.,+*., "#$. #/0 /0
(210) Y'. % D -! bcCj ^(%. 9:F! '
(211) ( \9:(% _ a :%. 7. !. T+ '/nG / +. _ ! Fig. ++b ' '¶>,k! T3 4 +,3,*,,+** m +$% . ! W'm + tuF F T+ G /. .ῌ+ῌ. !" #$%. }/{|! Fig. +* ,R. &("#) * ! 7b('#$.
(212) Nµ¥k7O¶·k ¸Pk¹ ºkNQPkhR»¼. 550. U>B; 3 V ,- /5 . -,/**6/,/** m "W
(213) BG 3 V + X'Y ++ V +. ,Z[ ,**.a ,**.b. \B]^
(214) 5_"G4 / ,**. 3 ,-
(215) . /5 !`!"a#$bc&%: >d& Hekla +31* ' c&a# (Thorarinsson and Sigvaldasson, +31,) Mount St. Helens +32* '. c&a# (Carey and Sigurdsson, +32,) Mef +33+ ' c&a# ,gh +33- ; ijk( +33,. T> B Hudson +33+ ' c&a# (Scasso et al., +33.) (l3)m
(216) BG n*oXp%: + `!"(, jqrGB Carey and Sigurdsson (+32,) Mount St. Helens +32* ' d&rGB. /5. !s--tu.Z"(/. '_Bvw> <(x01 y>"z{> >5>( 23|}~ ,**. ' 3 V ,- Fig. ++. The relationship among T,, D- and Tunder the conditions of average lateral wind velocity estimated from Fig. +*. Considering the range of cloud height estimated from Fig. +*, we estimated T, as the intersection of the line showing a relation between T+ and the line of the sum of T, and T-. The range of T, can therefore be estimated at ..2 to 0.2 minutes (a). Furthermore, the range of D-, which transported the pyroclasts, can be determined as +,3**ῌ,,*** m (b).. 45>Z67>BG u.Z'-t vwU4bG 3 Me f +33+ ' c&a#8%:+ `! "(,rGBgh (+33-) X'Yij k ( (+33,) %:+,>BG!o79 +8 "5 %:+ `!"(, jq 79 w6"(c&'; "U4 >5> Mef. d& a# vw T I @)S"(:BG ,gh +33-. ;. T ;k%:)>B"l 3
(217) BG(G"G < T23 U.
(218) . >$7XGB ,**. ' 3 V ,- ;. .
(219) a# d&">B c&$c&N . ! Ht " #. . T>B a# vw U>. . Hb " $ %& '. ()* (Sparks,. Ht++.-,,Hb-2b*.. '}+"(a# c& 3 >6!;/G! ,/5==. +320) ; (+,). > /.. km !. ; ?(@AB>a# C<"5 a# vw/5. b* / 0 -ῌ+*ῌ, 12
(220). !7>BG"$¡G(G >5. 34 #. /5 21*6+,,.* m. > Da# %:+,>BG!o+ C. $7 / 0 +/* m "" /5 . 8" U" Fig. - Fig. . ¢. ! 8 ,,1-*6-,,,* m ,!. >a%:# £AEF DG ¤H. /,,3*6/,12* m. "9:;"< . ;PIXGBa# J ¥Zvw. => (+,) ?@A . > 5rT¥ 5|}¦"U4(. >BCDEF
(221) BG HEIJ '. p((G. (KLEM CDE >NO !. §¨"vw-t ©}ª>«J¬'" ®K. PQ>B>3 RSG T. >a# L>BM¯°" ±²³´.
(222) W"FK nE¢£¹¹ NO ,**. 3 8 ,- +#C[º» ¼ ¹¹. 551.
(223)
(224) Schumacher. &+AX
(225) n+uvH&KR+H&
(226). and Schmincke, +33/ ; +33- . ]R n+rXLFd]e+ X. ! "#$. K %]e+ nf
(227) . %&'()*+,
(228) -./01 2+34
(229) 5. m'&Kp34
(230) +. 67
(231) ,**. 3 8 ,- ,* +"9
(232) :;<=>. #JLQD
(233) K^_. ?@AB 3/ῌ #CDBEF-.. R+ nm'u'&Kl0&1 . EGH IJK (Fig. 1) #JL ,**. 3 8 ,-. CHd
(234) . MNOP QRS+TU. m' Fig. +, + ,**. 3 8 ,- . V&&1 W3 XC
(235) YZ[+IJ. [xyz{6 K X .῍+῍, .῍+῍- '&. K
(236) \
(237) . K T,, T- ¡¢£¤I
(238) ¥JLF
(239) Ks . X ]+ XK^_
(240) `+. ¡¢£¤S¦¤+§F¤XL . QRS+ab
(241) cXd_e+W. nm'¨E -,0+* m n©ª«. f
(242) FCghi*jkcl0 F Q . E +*/* m T+ . T, 0 T- 3 . +33/ XmXD' ncc Mop. D+ ,,.3* m, %XL D- ,,*** m XL¬
(243) . +qJLr
(244) Ks taS+ nuvw. +3 .. ®¯X (°±² ++./³+, mῌs. +#JL+f
(245) FCxyz{. [´+"#% ,..3 km V&D'X. l0+dF V'+ MNOP :;. K ®¯m' . +3 .2 + n©ª. <=>?|}~g{sLF_=. E -,0+* m +µXK n% ]. V&LF
(246) m' n#ucEG+
(247) _m. e V¶¶ +-³+. mῌs ·+#JL. 'opD_ n
(248) +fV. [´+! ../+ km V&K nV&
(249) . ^_[V
(250) FCxyz{cl0+dF . n XK_e+¸f
(251) +. Fig. +,. A schematic illustration showing the transportation and sedimentation process of the pyroclasts derived from the eruption that occurred on September ,-, ,**., at the Asama volcano..
(252) 552. ·m¸¸¹¸0l º¸O¸2»¼.
(253) . fW ,**. g 3 c ,- L +3 .. 6h. .
(254) 9AxB, 34W6.
(255) !". i
(256) ,D066K4+% J. #$% &'
(257) +* ( +3 /. . ! , 34.
(258) ) 1 km * +. s6j+% <ki . ,+ ,.,--.+ mm . 9 lm n
(259) eU634D. % " #.
(260) +. R3 ,.,--.+ mm 9K4% o6U. /. , km !"# 3 (. pJOcD 0DW6 ,-/ q¡9R. ,* *- $0 +,+** m %12&34+%. 4+V_ I
(261) ¢=rs569 &. +
(262) + 5'6(,7
(263) 5'
(264) 8. '
(265) +3 (
(266) 3 km ,-- mm.
(267) )9:6;<==>). 34+9VA6t£_¤9 . ?"34+%. , +3 .. uv+( / . *@AB , + ,-7C6./. 4 ,..3 km # G" .
(268) H. D 0E9+ , >)F1GH. $0 -,.-*--,2** m T ¥ wS Oc06. 2 634+ I . 21*-+,,.* mU JOc+(. 56=JK78L%. ../+. km !"dN+% !"dND 2 ". M9:NJ9 (,) ;
(269) <= 6. F1% &'
(270) +* ( . D>09 OJ% 9P ?M.
(271) ) 1 km x+ 2 . 9: ,* wt.ῌ ,., mm 6Q >09. +,
(272) 8+ ,.,--.+. 9
(273) @
(274) R3 , mm 9. mm v+% I v9. % IAB CSD* T E.
(275) + /. +32.U FGD% +
(276) + I V.
(277) H
(278) 3 km %%y%12&. , km #== 3 . *J D 0DW X59 . 34+ ¦z6Q{+ 5'6(. YZ[\]99^ H_6`I+. ,7
(279) 5'
(280) 8
(281) ). ! N+JW9% abK4+ 3 c ,- L. 9:6;<==?"34+% +
(282). MV dN06 (-,.-*--,2** m) ef. + O§ jd OcU|H/ ¨. * ghOiI9
(283) 9^ j_634+. ©6wG}ª+I9 G« (. " 566kPD9 , mm . 34DJ0+Ax qr]stuB. 0DW -* 9 T0l. 9 v
(284) 569 WTyv<I9. +321U% I ab mQ nR6o*pI+q.
(285) Oc~;7v
(286) 569, 5'. r]stuB * v
(287) . 9 E= kP i%. I96wS+% +
(288) + Ax
(289) +3 (. 34, +76@AB¬DO . 34+I96`ID9 I qr]. >)U ¨©6$ V}ª+. stuB Ty zE eU,
(290) 8{.
(291) *u®r¯°% *d±D<. |VVW v
(292) 7X65j}9+~. ²6i. 40l (+321) Y9*ZD. ~; ³6´£% I " 4uv+. ¨©6M34, dN. iI9pED[\0% D. h=!i* 06 µ. eU,{|V39. hi h*6iDP " G\. ]D9 #9$^ U_
(293) r\. }ª*% +
(294) + * G\6kD.
(295) 8MJ% ,
(296) 8 6D. &'C iGH. `a
(297) b6+
(298) !+. , 34C/+HP % . % uBv OcW7 !"d. 06 49* D. ¨©6`. ND 2 569, 5'9 E. I+34, ~;D4D@AB. = kP6>0i%. ¶6! a(!O§ VAB. 0ῌ ῏῍ῐ῍ῒῑ῎ΐ. Auq6+>0i%. *d e9! 1.,+* kg ,6 0.
(299) ¼*+ x¸!hh ,**. A 3 Z ,- X £9xy hh . .
(300) !"
(301) # $%&'()*+, -"./012 3 3 456 786 9:; ! <"#++=12 >? @$%ABC& D' ( )*EF+,-G H?+ -I./"JK0./0L 1 2345/M6>N2 O78P9-Q: ;7R 2 Bonadonna, C., Ernst, G. G. J. and Sparks, R. S. J. (+332) Thickness variations and volume estimates of tephra fall deposits : the importance of particle Reynolds number. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 2+, +1-ῌ+21. Carey, S. N. and Sigurdsson, H. (+32,) Influence of particle aggregation on deposition of distal tephra from the May +2, +32*, eruption of Mount St. Helens volcano. J. Geophys. Res., 21, 1*0+ῌ1*1,. Carey, S. N. and Sparks, R. S. J. (+320) Quantitative models of the fallout and dispersal of tephra from volcanic eruption columns. Bull. Volcanol., .2, +*3ῌ+,/. S<= (,**.a) TU>V WX Y?@ +0 A 3 Z[ +ῌ+0. S<= (,**.b) TU>V WX Y?@ +0 A ++ Z[ +ῌ+*. A\B]^_'C^DE`F^GHIJ^a K^ Lb]^M+NO^c3PQ^RSTU^Ede (+33,) +33+ A(Vf g9eW + h2 Xi1YiZ[\jikl]klm ,1 1+ῌ 2*. R^no (+32.) e_S<i2 `piabq `p. -+.p. Ede ^ _'C ^ A\B] ^ DE`F ^ a K (+33/) cd@er h (Vf g a W , h2 .* +ῌ+,. Ede^s8 ^fghi^jkle^3^ _'C^GHIJ^mnPo (,**,) pq ,*** A t?>N9rs2 .1 0+3ῌ0.-. Scasso, R., Corbella, H. and Tiberi, P. (+33.) Sedimentological analysis of the tephra from the +,ῌ+/ August +33+ eruption of Hudson volcano. Bull. Volcanol., /0, +,+ῌ+-,. Scorer, R. S. (+3/1) Experiments of convection of isolated masses of buoyant fluid. J. Fluid. Mech., ,, /2-ῌ/3.. Schumacher, R. and Schmincke, H. U. (+33/) Models for the origin of accretionary lapilli. Bull. Volcanol., /0, 0,0ῌ 0-3. M+NO^_'C^Ede^A\B] (+33-) (V +33+ A atu?N vesicular tu#. X i1YiZ[\jikl]klm ,2 3+ῌ32. Sparks, R. S. J. (+320) The dimensions and dynamics of. 553. volcanic eruption columns. Bull. Volcanol., .2, -ῌ+/. Sparks, R. S. J., Bursik, M. I., Carey, S. N., Gilbert, J. S., Glaze, L. S., Sigurdsson, H. and Woods, A. W. (+331) Volcanic Plumes. John Wiley & Sons, England, /1.p. fgI&^M3uv^w3nF (+32,) pq +311 A vd^wxy2 ,1 ++3ῌ+.*. xgzy (+322) {NY2 |^}~ `p +-+p. ^nz&^Aa^jkle^ABC&^ {|^+ -G (,**,) pq ,*** A }~xy2 .1 0./ῌ00+. x7 (+321) (Yh(@H?()h2 `pab `p +1,p.
(302) ^Ef^ ^+ (,**/a) +w a!h ,**- A , Z 0 X Uh2 /* +2-ῌ+3..
(303) ^ 3 ^ ^ ^ Ef (,**/b) R ) h,**. A 3 Z +/ῌ+2 X h2 /* ///ῌ/0/2 3CG (+33-)+33* A +33- A(V 2 \ xim Yxm[ 0 +-*ῌ+0+. Thorarinsson, S. and Sigvaldasson, G. E. (+31,) The Hekla eruption of +31*. Bull. Volcanol., -0, ,03ῌ,22. Wilson, L., Sparks, R. S. J., Huang, T. C. and Watkins, N. D. (+312) The control of volcanic column heights by eruption energetic and dynamics. J. Geophys, Res., 2-, +2,3ῌ+2-0. Woods, A. W. (+322) The dynamics and thermodynamics of eruption columns. Bull. Volcanol., /*, +03ῌ+2+. ^Ef^tQ^RU^ ^ ^ + ^ ^ Et ^ z ¡^nz&^d¢^+£¤^E7^¥ PQ^M¦^§ ^345 (,**/) ,**. A awyt 2 /* /+3ῌ/--2. A+. .
(304) . ¨7©Sª<Lxr©S ª «¬®%%t W¯°©S ªX >N¡%eZM±,¢2 % % URL O£² ; http : //www.hbc.jp/pro-weather/index.html/. e8 xrS<¡% ¤¥¦§i% %¨³>N,+©&ª¡%2 %% URL O£² ; http : //weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html. 7%«¬® ««/¯¨°<± xrS<² ¨´&³´µ³N2 ¶%· 7 WRegionX tH? WSoutheast asiaX µ¶ ««¨°&³´¸¹ 2 WType of plotX µ WText : ListX "º,+¶»·7 dK.
(305) 554. hijklmdnolhpqrl#s tliurlvwxy.
(306) . JGK7LMGHA 3 GKNO".>PA. (.10**)
(307) . QRST > U"OV
(308) JGK ,- ,+ G. !"#. $%&'() *+,- ./01
(309) 23(456. #$%&'()*+@"FWX
(310) Y(Z3(4. 7 89#$%&'().:;<=>-. GH7 [,-ῌ+,\ ]^_-. "?@
(311) 23(4ABCDEFGH7 UTC >I
(312). U`abc de fg_.
(313)
図
+3
関連したドキュメント
②藤橋 40 は中位段丘面(約 12~13 万年前) の下に堆積していることから約 13 万年前 の火山灰. ③したがって、藤橋
ⅰ.計装ラック室,地震計室(6 号炉) ,感震器室(7 号炉) ,制御
を基に設定するが,敷地で最大層厚 35cm が確認されていることも踏まえ,堆積量評価結果
敷地からの距離 約48km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山..
敷地からの距離 約66km 火山の形式・タイプ 複成火山.. 活動年代
敷地からの距離 約82km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山. 活動年代
敷地からの距離 約82km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山.
敷地からの距離 約48km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山.