• 検索結果がありません。

ズボンのポケットに収納したスマートフォンによる歩容解析方法に関する検討

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "ズボンのポケットに収納したスマートフォンによる歩容解析方法に関する検討"

Copied!
8
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)Vol.2014-UBI-43 No.13 2014/7/29. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 1,a). 1,b). 1,c). 3. 0.7-0.9. Niijima Arinobu1,a). 2-4. Mizuno Osamu1,b). Tanaka Tomohiro1,c). 1. [1] [2] [3] [8], [9]. [4], [5], [6]. (1). 3. 3. (2). [7]. 3 1. a) b) c). NTT NTT, 1-1 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka-Shi, Kanagawa, 239-0847 Japan [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]. c 2014 Information Processing Society of Japan !. 1.

(2) Vol.2014-UBI-43 No.13 2014/7/29. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 2.. [21], [22] [21] 10cm [10] [11], [12]. [23], [24], [25], [26]. [13], [14], [15]. Cloete. Xsens. MEMS. 1% [11]. [25]. [13]. Tadano. [26] 10 0.98. 0.97. 0.78. Jimenez [14]. 3.. 1% 1% [16] [1] Mladenov %. (. 10%. [16]. 1). [10]. k-means. 2. HMM. [17], [18], [19], [20]. 1 θ(deg). Ll (m). L(m). L = 2Ll sinθ V (m/s). c 2014 Information Processing Society of Japan !. L(m). 2.

(3) Vol.2014-UBI-43 No.13 2014/7/29. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 1: 3: !"#$%&'()*+. ,-#$,&'()*+. [27] 2343+. 2545+. ./01+. 3 2: T (s). V = 2L/T. [10]. 5.. 4.. 5.1. 3 3 (1) (2) 5.2 (3). 26-29. 3. 3. 170cm. Samsung Galaxy S4 3 3 3. 3. 100Hz 100ms. c 2014 Information Processing Society of Japan !. 3. 3 3.

(4) Vol.2014-UBI-43 No.13 2014/7/29. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 1:. 250Hz. 3 1. 2. 3. 3. X. 0.77. 3.21. Y. 9.87. 9.42. 9.90. Z. -1.24. -0.73. -0.41. X. 0.51. 2.57. 0.40. Y. 9.88. 9.57. 9.90. Z. -0.50. -0.98. -0.34. X. Y. Z. 0.80. 2m. 3m. 1. 3. 3. 5.3. 3. 3 1. n. 1. a(n) n f(n). 2. f (n) = 0.1 ∗ a(n) + 0.9 ∗ f (n − 1). 6. 3 3 3. 6.1 50ms 3 Samsung Galaxy S4 3. MA-8000 2 3. stepwise 1. 3 R2. RMSE 1. 3 1-2. (18-22 (64-80. 1-3 1-1. 6.2 ). 4. ). 7. 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-1 1-3 1-1. 7 1-3. 4. 1-2 1-2 3. R2. RMSE. 6.3 3. 2. 3 R2 RMSE. 0.7-0.9. 4-6 4. 15Hz. c 2014 Information Processing Society of Japan !. 18 20 22. 4.

(5) Vol.2014-UBI-43 No.13 2014/7/29. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. R2. 2:. RMSE. R2. RMSE (deg). 1-1. 0.91. 4.76. 1-2. 0.81. 6.15. 1-3. 0.72. 2-1 2-2. R2. 3:. RMSE. R2. RMSE (deg). 15-1. 0.76. 5.85. 15-2. 0.92. 3.59. 7.86. 15-3. 0.86. 4.71. 0.72. 7.94. 16-1. 0.53. 7.78. 0.96. 3.09. 16-2. 0.83. 4.66. 2-3. 0.96. 2.84. 16-3. 0.78. 5.41. 3-1. 0.87. 5.27. 17-1. 0.83. 4.32. 3-2. 0.84. 5.91. 17-2. 0.85. 4.30. 3-3. 0.84. 6.20. 17-3. 0.86. 3.94. 4-1. 0.91. 4.24. 18-1. 0.89. 4.32. 4-2. 0.74. 6.75. 18-2. 0.94. 3.50. 4-3. 0.87. 5.02. 18-3. 0.91. 4.57. 5-1. 0.92. 4.00. 19-1. 0.84. 6.34. 5-2. 0.96. 2.65. 19-2. 0.90. 4.83. 5-3. 0.64. 8.08. 19-3. 0.80. 7.26. 6-1. 0.90. 3.77. 20-1. 0.89. 4.98. 6-2. 0.71. 6.52. 20-2. 0.92. 4.17. 6-3. 0.85. 4.58. 20-3. 0.93. 3.96. 7-1. 0.81. 5.53. 21-1. 0.69. 6.86. 7-2. 0.93. 3.50. 21-2. 0.65. 7.17. 7-3. 0.70. 7.12. 21-3. 0.84. 5.02. 8-1. 0.93. 3.52. 22-1. 0.98. 2.17. 8-2. 0.81. 5.74. 22-2. 0.93. 3.50. 8-3. 0.88. 4.50. 22-3. 0.94. 3.72. 9-1. 0.90. 4.08. 9-2. 0.87. 4.81. 9-3. 0.93. 3.47. 10-1. 0.61. 7.20. 10-2. 0.84. 4.55. 10-3. 0.90. 3.80. 11-1. 0.71. 7.23. 11-2. 0.93. 3.78. 11-3. 0.74. 6.87. 12-1. 0.96. 2.70. 12-2. 0.77. 6.62. 12-3. 0.88. 4.69. 13-1. 0.96. 2.84. 13-2. 0.93. 3.67. 13-3. 0.93. 3.44. 14-1. 0.90. 4.68. 14-2. 0.86. 5.88. 14-3. 0.89. 4.59. 6.4. [16]. 2000-3000ms. 5 11 16 21. c 2014 Information Processing Society of Japan !. 5. 5.

(6) Vol.2014-UBI-43 No.13 2014/7/29. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. 3456789'. %#$. #$ #$. '##$. %###$. %'##$. "###$. "'##$. "#$. &#$ #$ #$. '##$. &###$. &'##$. %###$. %'##$. !&#$. !"#$. ()&(-.,'. 3456789'. %#$ &#$ #$ #$. (##$. &###$. (a) 18-1 "#$. !"#$%&()*+,'. #$ #$. '##$. &###$. &'##$. %###$. %'##$. !&#$. "#$. *+,-./012' 3456789'. %#$. &#$. (c) 18-3. &#$ #$ #$. '##$. &###$. &'##$. %###$. %'##$. !&#$ !%#$. !%#$. '#$. &###$. &'##$. %###$. !&#$ !%#$. %#$. %'##$. &#$ #$ #$. (##$. 3456789'. &###$. !&#$. &(##$. %###$. &#$ #$ #$. '##$. &###$. &'##$. %###$. !&#$ !%#$ !"#$. ()&)./-'. (g) 22-1. %###$. *+,-./012'. %#$. !"#$ ()&(-.,'. "#$. 3456789'. !%#$. !"#$. &'##$. (f) 20-3. !"#$%&()*+,'. !"#$%&)*+,-'. #$ &###$. '##$. ()&(-.,'. *+,-./012'. "#$. &#$. '##$. #$ !&#$. (e) 20-2. *+,-./01 2'. #$. #$. !"#$. (d) 20-1. %#$. &#$. ()&(-.,'. ()&(-.,'. "#$. 3456789'. !%#$. !"#$. !"#$. *+,-./012'. %#$ !"#$%&()*+,'. 3456789'. %#$. ()&)./-$. (b) 18-2. *+,-./012'. %###$. !"#$ ()&(-.,'. "#$. &(##$. !&#$ !%#$. !"#$. !"#$%&()*+,'. *+,-./012'. 3456789'. !%#$. !%#$. !"#$%&()*+,'. '#$. *+,-./012'. %#$ !"#$%&()*+,'. "#$ !"#$%&()*+,'. "#$. *+,-./012'. !"#$%&)*+,-'. &#$. (h) 22-2. ()&(-.,'. (i) 22-3. 4:. 3. 1. 90. 7.. c 2014 Information Processing Society of Japan !. 6.

(7) Vol.2014-UBI-43 No.13 2014/7/29. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. &#$. !"#$%&()*+,'. 456789:'. "#$ %#$. 3456789'. "#$ %#$ #$ #$. #$ #$. (##$. %###$. %(##$. "###$. '##$. %###$. 3456789'. 3456789'. %#$ "#$. "(##$. %###$. &#$. "#$. #$. '##$. "###$. "'##$. %###$. &#$. #$. '##$. "###$. !"#$%&()*+,'. "#$ %#$ #$ %(##$. "###$. "(##$. &###$. !%#$ !"#$. "'##$. %###$. %'##$. ()&(-.,'. (f) 16-3 &#$. *+,-./012' 3456789'. "#$. &#$. %###$. "#$. (e) 16-2. 3456789'. (##$. %#$. !"#$. (d) 16-1. #$. *+,-./012'. ()&(-.,'. *+,-./012'. %###$. #$. %'##$. !"#$ ()&)./-'. '#$. &'##$. 3456789'. %#$. %(##$. !"#$. (#$. &###$. (c) 11-3. #$. #$ "###$. '##$. ()&(-.,'. !"#$%&()*+,'. !"#$%&()*+,'. *+,-./012'. (##$. #$ !&#$. (b) 11-2. *+,-./012'. #$. #$. !"#$. &#$. &#$. &#$. ()&(-.,'. (a) 11-1 '#$. 3456789'. !%#$. ()*)./-'. !"#$%&)*+,-'. "###$. !"#$. !"#$. !"#$%&)*+,-'. %'##$. !%#$. !%#$. *+,-./012'. %#$. %#$ #$ #$. '##$. *+,-./012) 3456789). "#$. %###$. %'##$. "###$. !"#$%&()*+,$. !"#$%&)*+,-'. &#$. "#$. *+,-./012'. +,-./0123'. '#$. !"#$%&()*+,'. (#$. %#$ #$ #$. '##$. %###$. %'##$. "###$. "'##$. &###$. !%#$. !%#$. !"#$. !"#$ ()&)./-'. '(&(-.,). ()&(-.,'. (g) 21-1. (h) 21-2. (i) 21-3. 5: [3]. ,. ,. ,. ,. . [4]. R. 2. 0.7-0.9. RMSE. 4-6. [5]. [6]. . , Vol. 56, No. 2,. pp. 67–72, 2008. , . . , Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 505–509, 2007. , , , , , , , , . . , Vol. 15, pp. 131–140, 2000. , , , , . . No. 10, pp. 1951–1962, 2004.. ,D-2, Vol. J87-D-2,. [7] [1]. , , .. ,. ,. ,. ,. . [2]. ,. ,. , ,. , ,. , ,. [8]. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/seisaku/09.html. , , , .. [9]. Vol.18 CS-3, pp. 135–140, 2013. , , ,. . VR. , pp. 1–8, 2012. , . .. . VR. , Vol. 2013-CVIM-186, No. 3, pp. 1–10, 2013.. c 2014 Information Processing Society of Japan !. . Vol.19. CS-1, pp. 27–32, 2014. [10]. .. .. 7.

(8) Vol.2014-UBI-43 No.13 2014/7/29. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. [11]. [12]. [13]. [14]. [15]. [16]. [17]. [18]. [19]. [20]. [21]. [22]. [23]. [24]. [25]. , 2005. , . Fash : ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. , .. , pp. 301–302, 2009. . , Vol. 44, No. 4,. . : pp. 621–627, 2006. , , . . , Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 243–250, 1999. Antonio R. Jimenez, Fernando Seco, Carlos Prieto, and Jorge Guevara. A comparison of pedestrian deadreckoning algorithms using a low-cost mems imu. In Proceedings of Intelligent Signal Processing, pp. 37–42, 2009. Kun Chan Lan and Wen Yuah Shih. Estimating step distance using simple harmonic motion. In Proceedings of Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 1–5, 2012. Martin Mladenov and Michael Mock. A step counter service for java-enabled devices using a built-in accelerometer. In Proceedings of Context-Aware Middleware and Services, pp. 1–5, 2009. Yan Huang, Huiru Zheng, Chris Nugent, Paul McCullagh, Norman Black, William Burns, Mark A. Tully, and Suzanne M. McDonough. An orientation free adaptive step detection algorithm using a smart phone in physical activity monitoring. Health and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 249–258, 2012. Agata Brajdic and Robert Harle. Walk detection and step counting on unconstrained smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 225– 234, 2013. Melis Oner, Jeffry A.Pulcifer-Stump, Patrick Seeling, and Tolga Kaya. Towards the run and walk activity classification through step detection - an android application. In Proceedings of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1980–1983, 2012. Oscar Ambres and Gracian Trivino. Gait quality monitoring using an arbitrarily oriented smartphone. In Proceedings of International Workshop Ambient Assisted Living and Home Care, pp. 224–231, 2012. , , , . . , Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 219–229, 2012. Masakatsu Kourogi and Takeshi Kurata. Personal positioning based on walking locomotion analysis with selfcontained sensors and a wearable camera. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 103–112, 2003. Francesco Alonge, Elisa Cucco, and Filippo D’Ippolito. Use of accelerometers and gyros for hip and knee angle estimation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 939–944, 2013. John Kyle P.Mueller, Boyd M.Evans, M.Nance Ericson, Ethan Farquhar, Randall Lind, Kevin Kelley, Martin Pusch, Timo von Marcard, and Jason M.Wilken. A mobile motion analysis system using inertial sensors for analysis of lower limb prosthetics. In Proceedings of Future of Instrumentation International Workshop, pp. 59–62, 2011. Teunis Cloete and Cornie Scheffer. Repeatability of an off-the-shelf, full body inertial motion capture system during clinical gait analysis. In Proceedings of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5125–5128,. c 2014 Information Processing Society of Japan !. [26]. [27]. 2010. Shigeru Tadano, Ryo Takeda, and Hiroaki Miyagawa. Three dimensional gait analysis using wearable acceleration and gyro sensors based on quaternion calculations. Sensors, Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 9321–9343, 2013. Jason Wiese, T. Scott Saponas, and A.J. Bernheim Brush. Phoneprioception: Enabling mobile phones to infer where they are kept. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2157–2166, 2013.. 8.

(9)

参照

関連したドキュメント

A limiting analysis on regularization of singular SDP and its implication to infeasible interior-point algorithms.. 3.非正則な SDP

For staggered entry, the Cox frailty model, and in Markov renewal process/semi-Markov models (see e.g. Andersen et al., 1993, Chapters IX and X, for references on this work),

On a construction of approximate inertial manifolds for second order in time evolution equations // Nonlinear Analysis, TMA. Regularity of the solutions of second order evolution

Nonlinear systems of the form 1.1 arise in many applications such as the discrete models of steady-state equations of reaction–diffusion equations see 1–6, the discrete analogue of

de la CAL, Using stochastic processes for studying Bernstein-type operators, Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Functional Analysis and Approximation The-

In order to be able to apply the Cartan–K¨ ahler theorem to prove existence of solutions in the real-analytic category, one needs a stronger result than Proposition 2.3; one needs

The intention of this work is to generalise the limiting distribution results for the Steiner distance and for the ancestor-tree size that were obtained for the special case of

Amount of Remuneration, etc. The Company does not pay to Directors who concurrently serve as Executive Officer the remuneration paid to Directors. Therefore, “Number of Persons”