Photocopying permitted bylicenseonly theGordon andBreachScience Publishers imprint.
Printed inSingapore.
An Optimal Relative Isoperimetric Inequality in Concave Cylindrical Domains in IR
INHOKIM*
Departmentof Mathematics,SeoulNational University,San56-1, Shinlim-Dong, Kwanack-gu, Seoul, 151-742,Korea
(Received2 February 1999; Revised 25 March1999)
Weproveanoptimalrelativeisoperimetric inequalityinconcavecylindricaldomains in 1
n,
whichgeneralizes the well-knowntwo-dimensional relativeisoperimetric inequality L >27rAin aplanarsectorwithangle greater thanorequaltoKeywords." Isoperimetric inequality; Sobolev inequality;Geodesic metricspace 1991 MathematicsSubjectClassification: Primary51M16; Secondary 53C21
1.
INTRODUCTION
The aim ofthispaperis topointout anoptimal relativeisoperimetric inequality inconcavecylindrical domains in I1nwhichplays animpor- tant role in the Sobolev inequalities and the mixed boundary value problemsofpartialdifferential equations.
Let Sbea sectorin
I12
with thesectorangle0<
27r.Itiswell-known that adomainfc
Ssatisfiestheoptimalrelativeisoperimetric inequalityLength(0Ft- 0S) > 20Area(Ft) Length(0f- 0S) > 2zrArea(Ft)
if0
<
rr,(1)
if 0
>_
7r.(2)
*E-mail:[email protected].
97
In
[3]
Lionsand Pacella have obtainedageneralizationof(1)
tosub- domains ofconvexcones inRn,
n>
2(see
also[4]).
In the samepaper theyhave also pointedoutsomeapplicationstosymmetrizationprob- lems and Sobolev inequalities.In
thispaperwewill giveahigherdimensional generalization of the inequality(2).
To state the resultwe first fixnotations. Letf:
1t 11be a Lipschitz continuous convex function i.e. for any
A
E[0, 1]
andanyt,t2E
f[(1 A)tl + At2] < (1 A)f(tl)+ f(t2).
Let
W
be theclosed cylindricalconcave(the
complementofaconvex)
domain inn,
n>
2,definedbyW-- {(Xl,X2,...,Xn)Ix2 _<f(x)}.
For n 2,
W
isjust the setV
of points on and under the graph off
in Ii2and,forn
>
2,W
istheproductofV
andn-2.
With this notation we stateMAIN THEOREM Let f be a compact domain in
W
withrectifiable
boundaryOf. Thenwehavethe relative isoperimetricinequality
Voln-1 (Of O]/Y) >_
nWoln() (n-1)/n,
where
wn
isthevolumeof
theunitballinn.
The equalitycase occursif
andonly
if
glis aEuclideanhalf
ballwithOf OVa;anEuclideanhalf
sphere.Remark For n--2, we recover the well-known relativeisoperimetric inequalityi.e.forg/c
V
Length(0f- 0V)
227rArea(ft).
By
the well-known argumentswe can deduce optimal Sobolev type inequality.COROLLARY Suppose theconvex
function f
iscontinuouslydifferentia-
ble.Let beasmooth
function
with compactsupportin 14;(note
that may notvanish onOW).
ThenwehaveJW ix7 _>n I1
We nowsketch a briefoutline of theproofof the MainTheorem.
Precisestatements willbe giveninthenexttwo sections.Weconsiderthe abstract geodesic metricspace (inthesenseof Alexandrov and
Gromov)
A4 definedbythedisjointunionofW
withitselfunderthe identifica- tionalongOW.
WewillshowA//isnonpositivelycurved in thesenseofGromov,
i.e. CAT(0)-inequalityholds forany geodesic trianglein3//.Since A4 is piecewise-linear we may apply the optimal isoperimetric inequality in
[2]
recently proved by Caoand Escobar. Thentherequired relative isoperimetric inequality inW
follows from the existence of canonical isometric reflection in i.e. the reflection with respect toOW.
2.
PRELIMINARIES
Welist someaspects of thetheoryof geodesicmetricspaceinthesense ofAlexandrovandGromovwhich willbe usedintheproof. Fordetails werefer the readerto
[1]
and[2].
Let
(A’, d)
bealocally-compact, geodesicmetricspace.Thenanytwo pointsp and q ofA’canbe connectedbyageodesic(i.e.distance-realizingcurve).
Wedenotethisgeodesicbyff-. LetAA(a0,
al,a2)
beageodesic triangle with vertices a0, al and a2. The corresponding comparison triangleA’ A’(a, a, a)
is atrianglein]12withthesamesidelengths asA.
A is said tosatisfy CAT(0)-inequality (comparison inequality of Alexandrov andToponogov)if, foranypE and the corresponding pointp’ Eaa’
2such thatd(al,p) dR2(dl,p’),
wehave the comparison inequalityd(ao,p) < dR2(ao,p’).
Ais said tosatify CAT*(0)-inequality if, for any pE and q aoa2 and thecorrespondingpoints
p’
aoalandq’ aoa
2,wehaved(p, q) <_ d:(p’, q’).
Wenowrecall threeLemmasfrom
[1].
LEMMA1
[1,
Lemma3]
CAT(O)-inequality andCAT* (O)-inequalityare equivalentonanyconvexsubsetof
X.LEMMA
2[1,
Lemma4]
LetA(ao,
b,c)
andA(al,
b,c)
be geodesic triangles satisfyingCAT*(O)-inequality.Supposeaob
tAbal
is a(minimal) geodesic betweenao
andal. Then the geodesic triangleA(ao,
al,c)
alsosatisfies
theCAT*(O)-inequality.LEMMA 3
[1,
Corollary5]
Let"1
and,’9(2be geodesic spaces satisfying CAT*(O)-inequality.Suppose A1
C 2(1andA2
C2(2areclosedandconvexsubsets such that thereisan isometry
of A1
ontoA2.
Then the glueing2(of
2(1 and2(2under the
identification of
A andA2
viatheisometry isalsoageodesic spacesatisfying CAT*(O)-inequalitywiththecanonicalglueing metricgivenby
f dxj(p,q)
ifp,qE 2(j (j=1,2)
dx(p,q) inf[dxl(p,r) + dx:(q,(r))] if
p 2(1 and q 2(2.rEAl
A
geodesicspace2(is said tobe nonpositively curvedinthesenseof GromovifCAT(0)-inequality is satisfied,locally. Itwasrecently proved by Cao and Esocobar that the Euclidean isoperimetric inequality remains true in a simply-connected, complete, piecewise-linear space which isnonpositivelycurvedinthesenseofGromov.THEOREM
[2]
Let.M
n be a simply-connected, complete,piecewise- linearmanifold
which is nonpositively curved in the senseof
Gromov.Then,
for
anycompactdomain9tc
iV[withrectifiable
boundaryOf,theEuclidean isoperimetricinequality
Voln-1 (O) nwln/n Vol,(ff)
(n-1)/nholds, and the equality occurs
if
andonlyif
f is isometric to a Eucli- dean ball.3.
PROOF OF THE MAIN THEOREM
First notethat the
convex
functionfdefiningthe cylindrical domain14 may be assumedtobepiecewise-linear bysimple approximation argu- ments.IV
isclearlyageodesicspacewithrespecttothe intrinsicmetric i.e. forany p, qW,
dw(p, q)
infLength(c),
where the infimumistakenoverallcontinuouspathsclying in
W
and connecting p to q. With respect tothis metric the boundary 0"14; is a closed andconvexsubsetofW.
Notealso thatOW
is isometrictoIR n-l,
because
cOW
istheproductof thegraphoff:
IRIR
andIRn-2. Now
we considerthe piecewise-linear geodesicspaceMn
obtained from glueingW
withitselfunder the identification alongOW.
We claimthatM
is nonpositively curved in thesenseofGromov. InviewofLemmas and 3 itsufficestocheck the validity ofCAT*(0)-inequalityin14;.LetA
A(a,
b,c)
be ageodesic triangle inW.
IfA is anEuclidean triangle, there isnothingtoprove. If A lies entirely inOW, CAT*(0)-
inequalityisalsotrivialbecauseOW
isisometrictoIR-1.
The remaining case canbe handledwiththeaidofLemma2.In fact,sincethefunctionf
ispiecewise-linear and the closeddomain
W
is concave(i.e. the com- plementofa convexdomain inn),
we candecomposeA into theunion of finite number ofEuclideantrianglesAj,
j 1,2,...,l.Hence,
apply- ingLemma2 successively,weconclude that A satisfies CAT*(0)-inequal- ity andtherebywehaveprovedthe claim.Let
f be any compactdomain inW
with rectifiableboundary0[2.Note that the space 3d has the canonical isometric reflection (with respectto
OW)
and thus thereis acompactdomain2 c
2M,theunion of f with itself under the identification along 0f 0W, satisfying the following volumerelationVoln(fi) 2Voln()),
Vol_
(Off)
2Vol_l(0f2 cOW).
Since
AA
is a simply-connected, complete,piecewise-linear andnon- positively curved space wemay apply the isoperimetric inequality by Caoand Escobar andthen,substituting the above volume relation,we obtainthe requiredrelativeisoperimetricinequality. The equalitycase follows easily from the equalitycaseof[2]
and theproofiscompleted.Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by
GARC,
BSRI-94-1416. The author wouldlike tothank ProfessorJ.Choe for bringing the paper[2]
tohis attentionand for fruitful conversations.
References
[1] W.Ballmann, Singular spaces of nonpositive curvature, Surlesgroupeshyperboliques d’apres MikhaelGromov, E.Ghys andP.de laHarpe (Eds.)Birkhauser(1990).
[2] J.CaoandJ.Escobar,Anisoperimetric comparison theorem forPL-manifoldsof non-positivecurvature, preprint.
[3] P.L.LionsandF.Pacella, Isoperimetric inequalities forconvexcones,Proc.A.M.S.109 477-485(1990).
[4] P.L.Lions,F. Pacella andM.Tricarico,Bestconstants inSobolev inequalities for functionsvanishing onsomepart of theboundary and related questions,Indiana Univ.
Math.J. 37 301-324(1988).