• 検索結果がありません。

A decomposition of the adjoint representation of $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ (Harmonic Analysis on Homogeneous Spaces and Representation Theory of Groups)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "A decomposition of the adjoint representation of $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ (Harmonic Analysis on Homogeneous Spaces and Representation Theory of Groups)"

Copied!
3
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

144

A decomposition of the adjoint representation of $U_{q}(\mathfrak{s}l_{2})$

SUSUMU ARIKI

Department ofInforn\’iation Engineering

and Logistics

Tokyo University ofMercantile Marine

Etchujima Koto-ku, Tokyo 135, Japan

Quantum algebra. First, we introduce notation.

DEFINITION. Lel $U_{q}^{(l)}$ be an associalive algeb

$ra/K=Q(q)(q$ is

an

indeterminate.), defined by a system of general$ors;e,$$f,k^{1},k^{-\frac{1}{}}$

,

an$d$

theirrelalions:

$k^{\frac{1}{2}}k^{-\frac{1}{2}}=1$

,

$k^{-\frac{1}{}}h^{\frac{1}{2}}=1$

$k^{f}ek^{-z}11=qe$ $k^{1}\tau fk^{-1}=q^{-1}f$

$ef-fe= \frac{k^{2}-k^{-2}}{q^{2}-q^{-l}}$

$As$ usnal, we give $U_{q}$ a Hopfalgebra structure by $eq$uippin$g$ il witln

$\Delta$ : $e e\otimes h^{-1}+k\otimes e$

$f f\Phi h^{-1}+k\emptyset f$

$k^{1} k^{1}\Phi k^{\iota}$

$S$ : $erightarrow-q^{-2}e,$ $f$ }$-\rangle$ $-qf,$ $k^{1}2\mapsto k^{-1}$

$\epsilon$ : $erightarrow 0,$ $frightarrow 0,$

$k^{1}\mapsto 1$

DEFINITION.

(1) $U_{q}^{(m)}$ denoles the

$su$balgebra of$U_{q}^{(l)}$ generaled by

$e,$ $f,$ $k,$ $k^{-1}$

.

(2) $U_{q}^{(\iota)}$ denoles lhe $sub$algebra of$U_{q}^{(m)}$ generaled by $E=ek,$ $F=$

$k^{-1}f,$ $K=h^{2},$ $K^{-1}$

.

REMARK. Ifwe choose an$ol1\iota er$ sysl$em$ ofgenerat$ors;B,$ $F,$ $h^{1},$ $k^{-1}$

for $U_{q}^{(l)}$

,

lhen $\Delta$ and $S$ become

$\Delta$ : $B B\Phi 1+k^{2}\Phi B$

$F F\otimes k^{-}+1QF$

$S$ : $Brightarrow-k^{-}B,$ $F\mapsto-Fh$

We pul, $C=fe+ \frac{qk+q^{-}k^{-}}{t^{q^{2}}-c^{-2})^{2}}$

Typeset by $A_{\mathcal{M}}S$-TEX

数理解析研究所講究録 第 761 巻 1991 年 144-146

(2)

145

$A\iota boi_{I1}t$ Representation.

DBFINITION. $U_{q}^{(\mathfrak{l})}$ becomes a $U_{q}^{(t)}- r\mathfrak{n}odu1e$ by

$Ad(e)x=erk-q^{-2}ksee$

$Ad(f)x=$

faeh

$-q^{2}hrf$ $( r\in U_{q}^{(t)} )$

$Ad(k^{1})ae=k^{1}nk^{-1}$’

We den$ote$ it by $(Ad, U_{q}^{ad})$

,

an$d$ we call it tlte adjoin$t$ representaiion.

DBFINITION. We $def_{I}\iota lesub_{I1}$odules of$U_{q}^{ud}$ as follo$ws$:

$V_{\alpha+:}=Ad(U_{q}^{(\dagger)})k^{\alpha+*}$ $(\alpha\in Z)$

$V_{l\alpha+1}=Ad(U_{q}^{(1)})k^{2\alpha+1}$ $(\alpha\in Z)$

$V_{\alpha}=Ad(U_{q}^{(1)})C^{-}$ “$k^{2}$

$(\alpha\in Z\leqq 0)$

$V_{a}=Ad(U_{q}^{(l)})k^{-\alpha+}e^{\alpha}+Ad(U_{q}^{(t)})k^{-\infty+}f^{\alpha}$ (ct E $Z>0$ )

$V_{\iota oe}=\oplus,,\geq 0K[C]Ad(U_{q}^{(\mathfrak{l})})h^{-n}\epsilon$“

DEFINITION. (1)

$X(d)=U_{q}^{(t)}/U_{q}^{(t)}\langle h^{i}- q^{t})$ $(d\in Z)$

It has a $11$aturally induced

$U_{l}^{(\mathfrak{l})}$-module structure usirtg $tl_{1}e$ lefl

regular representation of$U_{q}^{(\mathfrak{l})}$

.

We put,

$v_{d}=1$ mod $U_{q}^{(1)}$($h$

#-q)

(2) $L(d)$ is $t1_{t}e$irreduci$ble\iota I\iota odu$le $wit1_{1}t1\iota e1\iota igl_{1}e\epsilon t$ weiglrt $q^{\ell}$

.

(3) $\tau$is a K-algebraautomorphism $w1_{1}ic1_{1}\epsilon e\iota 1dse,$ $f,$ $h^{\}}$

to$f,$ $e,$ $h^{-\}}$

respectively.

IIBMAAK. $\tau$ induces an isom$orpl_{I}is\iota \mathfrak{n}$ between $X(d)$ an$dX(-d)$

.

$n_{ecol11}1^{ooiti_{ol1}}$ of tlte

AdJoint

lLepresentation.

$r_{1ltBonEM}$ (1) $U_{l}^{ad}=V_{\iota uc}\oplus(\oplus_{n\epsilon!I}V_{n})$ (2) $U_{q}^{(1n)}=V_{1}$ 。$g^{\oplus(\oplus_{n\epsilon zV_{\hslash}}}$ ) 2

(3)

146

($)

$U_{q}^{(\ell)}=V_{\iota}$

。$c^{\oplus t\oplus_{\mathfrak{n}\epsilon 2zV_{\hslash})}}$

(4) Any irreducible $submodu$le of$U_{q}^{oed}$ is $con$tained in $V_{l}$

。$e$

.

(5) $V_{n}(n \in\frac{1}{2}Z)s$ are indecomposable modules.

(6) $V_{2a}(\alpha\in Z_{>0})$ is isomorph$ic$ to

$X(\alpha)\oplus X(-\alpha)/(-id\oplus\tau)(U_{q}^{(l)}f^{\alpha}v_{a})$

$V\rho(\beta\not\in 2Z>0)s$ are isomorph$ic$ to $X(0)$

.

(7) $X(0)$ and $V_{2\alpha}s(\alpha\in Z_{>0})$ are mutually $n$on-isomorph$ic$

.

(8) Ifa direct summan$d$ of$U_{q}^{ad}$ is Rnitelygenerated an$d$ is

indecom-posable, then it is isomorphic to a $L(d)$

,

or a direc$t$ summan$d$ of

$X(0)^{\oplus}\oplus(\oplus_{j=1}^{r}V_{2j})$

.

REFERENCES

(1). M. Jimbo,A q-differenceanalogue of $U(g)$and the Yang.Baxter equation, Lett.

in Math.Phys. 10(1985), 63-69.

(2). G. Lusztig, Quantum deformations ofcerttin simple modules over enveloping

$alg$ebras,Adv. in Math. 70 (1988), 237-249.

(The author is grateful to Dr. M. Noumi for showing him this problem.)

参照

関連したドキュメント

Abstract The representation theory (idempotents, quivers, Cartan invariants, and Loewy series) of the higher-order unital peak algebras is investigated.. On the way, we obtain

In this context, the Fundamental Theorem of the Invariant Theory is proved, a notion of basis of the rings of invariants is introduced, and a generalization of Hilbert’s

In the current paper we provide an atomic decomposition in the product setting and, as a consequence of our main result, we show that

8.1 In § 8.1 ∼ § 8.3, we give some explicit formulas on the Jacobi functions, which are key to the proof of the Parseval-Plancherel type formula of branching laws of

(The modification to the statistical mechanics of systems were also studied from the perspective of the extension to the Standard Model that have Lorentz violating terms [36], and

• characters of all irreducible highest weight representations of principal W-algebras W k (g, f prin ) ([T.A. ’07]), which in particular proves the conjecture of

Here we associate Hecke algebras to general number elds, realize them as semigroup crossed products, and analyze their representations.. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classication:

In a preliminary section, we establish an analogue of the Minkowski–Weyl theo- rem (Theorem 2), showing that a tropical polyhedron can be equivalently described either as the sum of